No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Jacob Healthcare Center

4075 54th St., San Diego, CA 92105 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 128 certified beds · (619) 582-5168 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (619) 582-5168 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
5296 University Ave Ste F-1 · (844) 200-2426 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5507 El Cajon Blvd # B · (619) 458-9660 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Vien Dong<0.1 mi
5382 University Ave · (619) 583-3838 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5319 Orange Ave · (619) 235-1144 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
52nd St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.0%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.7%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.6%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.3%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.912.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.801.571.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 190 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.69U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.35hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.28hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.2%CMS range 48.3–64.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.0%CMS range 10.2–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.7–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.95
RN hours/ resident / day
1.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.85
RN hoursweekends
58.9%
Total nursing turnover
64.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 119.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.66 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect were maintained for six of six residents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) while providing care when:1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was rude and used a vulgar ( F) word when Resident 1 asked for assistance and threw soiled towels and linens after care leaving stains on the wall.2. Resident 2 verbalized CNA 1 was rude and had an attitude when CNA 1 entered the room and stated, What do you want?3. Resident 3 verbalized CNA 1 would leave him wet all night and was rude and rough while changing him. 4. Resident 4 verbalized he preferred not to ask CNA 1 for help because CNA 1 was rude and rough in her patient care and would say, What the 'F.ck' do you want?5. Resident 5 verbalized she felt scared to death and was observed crying, also stating that CNA 1 would glare at her when she asked for anything. 6. Resident 7 verbalized CNA 1 would start care without explaining what was going to be done and was rough when turning her,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold rights for one of two residents (Resident 26) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure had the potential for the resident and/or the resident's representative not to have information regarding bed hold rights.Findings: Resident 26 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs fail to adequately exchange oxygen, leading to low oxygen in the blood) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 1/12/26 at 8:34 A.M., Resident 26 was in bed with his eyes closed. Resident 26 was observed with a tracheostomy (an opening on the neck with a tube to help with breathing) and a feeding tube (tube placed in the stomach). During a review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a clinical assessment tool) dated 11/18/25, the MDS section C1000 indicated Resident 26's cognitive skills for daily decision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS- clinical assessment tool) assessment for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 115).This failure had the potential to cause the resident to not receive appropriate care.Findings: Per the facility's admission record, Resident 115 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of other encephalopathy (a brain disease that can cause confusion, memory loss, and coma [a prolonged state of deep unconsciousness]).During a record review of Resident 115's electronic medical record (EMR), the record indicated Resident 115 was admitted to hospice (is specialized, comfort-focused care for residents with a terminal illness (typically six months or less to live) who reside in a nursing home) with a diagnosis of late effect of Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) on 5/20/25. During a record review of Resident 115's paper medical record, the record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standard assessment to facilitate residents' care) related to hospice (medical care for residents expected to live six months or less) services were coded accurately for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 9). This failure could affect the residents' plan of care.Findings: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) per the admission Record. A review of Resident 9's clinical record was conducted on 1/12/26. Per the MDS assessment, dated 11/23/25, Section O: Special Treatments, Procedure, and Programs, indicated Resident 9 was under hospice care and services. Per the Physician's Order dated 6/25/25, Resident 9 was under hospice care and services. A further review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed no documented evidence in the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of healthcare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow level 2 (evaluation and determination) screening process of the PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, a federally required document to ensure residents are appropriately placed and/or for services) for two of two residents (Resident 5 and 114) reviewed for PASARR. This failure had the potential for Residents 5 and 114, not to receive the care and necessary services in the most appropriate setting. Findings: 1. A review of the clinical record for Resident 5 was conducted. The admission record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (severe mental health disorder involving distrust and suspicion of other people), and depression. A review of Resident 5's PASARR 1 dated 12/18/25 was conducted. PASARR 1 indicated Resident 5 was positive with Level 1 indicating Level 2 should have been submitted for evaluation and proper placement of Resident 5. An interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not develop patient centered care plans for two of six residents (Resident 1 and 6) reviewed for care plans. 1. Resident 1 had no teeth. 2. Resident 6 had a GT (GT-a tube inserted into the stomach for nutrition) dressing with discharge. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' (1, 6) needs, affecting their dignity, comfort, safety, and well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs fail to adequately exchange oxygen, leading to low oxygen in the blood) according to the facility's admission Record. The admission Record also indicated Resident 1's daughter was the responsible party (RP). An observation of Resident 1 was conducted on 1/12/26 at 9:06 A.M. Resident 1 was in bed with a tracheostomy (an opening on the neck with a tube to help with breathing) and feeding tube (tube in the stomach). Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of healthcare professionals working together to create a person-centered care plan) meeting was documented for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 9), when Resident 9 decided to revoke hospice service (medical care for residents expected to live six months or less). This failure had the potential to affect the revision of the care plan to reflect Resident 9's goals and preferences.Findings: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) per the admission Record. On 1/12/26 at 9:10 A.M., Resident 9 was observed in bed with eyes closed and wearing a hospital gown. A review of Resident 9's clinical record was conducted on 1/12/26. Per the MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs indicated Resident 9 was under hospice care and services.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents (128), who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs - self- care activities such as grooming, bathing, and toileting), received assistance with nail care [cleaning, trimming and/or filing of nails]) and shaving. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 128 was unshaven with debris under Resident 128's fingernails which had the potential to affect Resident 128's comfort and wellbeing.Findings: Resident 128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure (a condition when lungs cannot get enough oxygen in the blood) and need for assistance with personal care according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation and interview of Resident 128 was conducted on 1/12/26 at 8:49 A.M. Resident 128 was eating breakfast with black debris under fingernails and unshaven. Resident 128 had a tracheostomy (an opening on the neck with a tube to help with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide social service assistance for one of six residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medically-related social services when:1. A dental referral was not provided, 2. A hearing consultation was missed, 3. The social services assessments were inaccurate. These failures had the potential to delay care and services for the resident which could affect the resident's health and wellbeing, and quality of life. Findings: 1.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs fail to adequately exchange oxygen, leading to low oxygen in the blood) according to the facility's admission Record. The admission Record also indicated Resident 1's daughter was the responsible party. An observation of Resident 1 was conducted on 1/12/26 at 9:06 A.M. Resident 1 was in bed with a tracheostomy (an opening on the neck with a tube to help with breathing) and feeding tube (tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an open food item was labeled with an open date and stored properly in the reach-in refrigerator in the kitchen. This failure had the potential to cause food borne illness.Findings: On 1/12/26 at 7:49 A.M., a joint observation of the kitchen area was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). Inside the reach-in refrigerator was a torn-opened, used, unsealed crumpled plastic wrapper containing butter. The DM disposed of the butter and stated the butter should have been labeled, dated, and stored properly for the safety of the residents. Per the facility's policy and procedure, dated 2023, titled Labeling and Dating of Foods, indicated .Newly opened food items will be closed and labeled with an open date and used by the date that follows the various storage guidelines .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN) 11 did not wear a gown consistently while providing care to Resident 86 who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - involves gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents [example: residents with medical devices]), during medication (med) pass. 2. A certified nursing assistant (CNA) failed to properly use personal protective equipment (PPE - equipment such as gown and gloves used to protect staff and residents from potentially infectious diseases) while providing care for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 94). These failures had the potential for cross contamination and spread of infection. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 86's admission Record indicated Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure). On 1/15/26 at 7:50 A.M., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy regarding receipt and storage of controlled medications (drugs regulated by the government for its use, possession, and manufacture). This failure resulted in a medication card containing 60 tablets of Morphine (a controlled medication used for pain) to be missing and unaccounted for. Findings: On 11/1/24, the facility reported to the Department On 10/30/24, Staff reported to the DON that a medication Morphine Sulfate 15 milligrams 60 tablet card was nowhere to be found . On 11/13/24 at 8:45 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was interviewed. The ADON stated the missing medication was for Resident 1. The ADON stated the medication was noted to be missing on 10/30/24 when the facility attempted to reorder it. The ADON stated the pharmacy informed them it was already delivered on 10/20/24. The ADON stated the Facility Delivery Log was retrieved which indicated the medication was delivered on 10/20/24, and was signed in by a Licensed Nurse (LN 1). The ADON stated upon receipt of controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with activities of daily living (ADL - basic and everyday skills that are essential to living independently) were provided to two of three residents (Resident 28 and Resident 30) reviewed for ADL care when: 1. Resident 28 were not provided with incontinence (loss of bladder and/or bowel control) care in a timely manner and, 2. Resident 30 was not provided with nail care. This deficient practice placed Resident 28 and Resident 30 at risk for skin breakdown and decreased quality of life. Findings: 1. According to the admission Record, Resident 28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (inability to use both arms and legs), need for assistance with personal care, and personal history of urinary tract infections. A review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/1/23 indicated, a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status - a tool to assess cognition) score of 3. According…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs - ie. positioning, dark room, ice/heat, massage), as ordered by the physician, prior to the administration of PRN (as needed) pain medications for three of three residents (Residents 22, 99 and 312) reviewed for pain management. This failure had the potential for Residents 22, 99 and 312 not to receive non-prescription pain relief, prior to receiving narcotic pain medications with added side effects. Finding: 1. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic pain syndrome (when a person experiences persistent pain that interferes with daily life), per the facility's admission Record. On 9/11/24, Resident 22's clinical records were reviewed: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a clinical assessment tool), Resident 22 had a cognitive score of 15, indicating cognition was intact. The section titled, Health Condition, indicated, Resident 22 received scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet care needs, when call lights were not answered timely for three of six confidential residents (CR 1, 2, 3) interviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure had the potential to result in residents' needs not being met, which had the potential to result in physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: On 9/9/24, a review of the offsite survey record indicated, the facility had low weekend staffing on the 3rd quarter of 2024. An interview on 9/9/24 at 8:27 A.M., with CR 2 was conducted. CR 2 stated he had a left heel wound and cannot see well. CR 2 stated he needed assistance in going to the bathroom, transfers, or going to bed. CR 2 stated staff ignored his call light when he needed help. Staff came and turned off the call light. On 9/10/24 at 10:13 A.M., a confidential meeting with the residents was conducted. Two of five residents have identified issues with call light response. 1. CR 2 stated it took a lot of time for call lights to get answered especially on the evening shift (3pm -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review II (PASARR II - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals with mental disorders were not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were conducted for two of five residents (Resident 6 and Resident 99) reviewed for PASARR screening. This failure had the potential for Residents 6 and 99, to be improperly placed and not have received additional qualified services. Findings: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a chronic mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), per the facility's admission Record. On 9/12/24, Resident 6's clinical records were reviewed: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a clinical assessment tool), dated 8/1/24, Resident 6 had a cognitive score of 12, indicating cognition was intact. According to the PASARR I Screening, dated 6/10/24, Resident 6 was coded, Positive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered care plan for one of six residents (Resident 6) when Resident 6's care plan did not include dementia care. This failure had the potential for Resident 6's needs to be unmet. Findings: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes low interest in things that once brought joy) and anxiety disorder (feelings that results in panic attacks), according to the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 6's History and Physical (a medical examination that involves a patient interview, physical exam, and documentation of findings), dated 6/15/24, indicated Resident 6 has dementia (loss of cognitive function that affects thinking, remembering, and reasoning) and Resident 6 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A joint interview and record review was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/12/24 at 10:01 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents (Resident 81's) care plan was revised when Resident 81's gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube surgically inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) was discontinued. This failure had the potential for Resident 81's care to be miscommunicated among caregivers. Findings: Resident 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included traumatic subdural hemorrhage (brain bleed) according to the admission Record. An observation was conducted on 9/9/24 at 11:55 A.M. in the resident dining hall. Resident 81 was observed feeding himself with a family member present. A review of Resident 81's physician's order, dated 8/22/24, indicated Resident 81 had a diet order for soft textured food. A review of Resident 81's care plan indicated, Resident 81 had a G-tube. Resident 81's care plan indicated check tube feeding residuals (the volume of fluid remaining in the stomach during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for three of eight residents (Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 18) when: 1. A resident (Resident 5) was newly diagnosed at the facility with schizophrenia (a chronic mental illness characterized by delusions and hallucinations), without meeting the criteria for schizophrenia as indicated by The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM, a reference manual from the American Psychiatric Association to help define and classify mental disorders). 2. A resident (Resident 6) was newly diagnosed at the facility with schizophrenia without meeting the criteria for schizophrenia as indicated by the DSM. 3. A licensed nurse (LN 32) did not obtain the heart rate of Resident 18 prior to administering two blood pressure medications. This failure had the potential for Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 18 to experience unnecessary medication side effects. (Cross Reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was maintained when side rails were not installed for one of one residents (Resident 28) reviewed for side rails. As a result, there was a potential for Resident 28 to sustain injury. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included functional quadriplegia (the inability to move due to severe physical disability or frailty) and epilepsy (a disorder which causes seizures). A review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/1/23 indicated, a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 3. According to the BIMS scoring, a score of 0-7 indicated severe mental impairment. On 09/09/24 at 8:45 A.M. an observation was made in Resident 28's room. Resident 28 was laying in bed with her bed pushed up against the wall. There were no side rails observed on Resident 28's bed. A review of Resident 28's Side Rail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide dialysis (treatment to remove waste from the body) access care, including removal of dressing from the dialysis site for one of one sampled residents (Resident 71) reviewed for dialysis. As a result, there was a potential for complications after dialysis. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste) and dependence on dialysis. On 9/9/24 at 9:49 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 71. Resident 71's dialysis access site was on the left upper arm. There was a pressure dressing taped over the dialysis access site. Resident 71 stated he went to dialysis treatments on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. On 9/9/24 at 10:01 A.M., an interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 35. LN 35 stated Resident 71's last dialysis treatment was on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five residents (Resident 5 and Resident 6) were free from unnecessary medications when Resident 5 and Resident 6 were given antipsychotic medications (medication to treat psychosis) without clear indications. This failure had the potential for Resident 5 and Resident 6 to experience unnecessary medication side effects. Cross Reference F658 Findings: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (a mental condition causing intense feelings of fear and anxiety) and major depressive disorder (a mental illness causing persistent feelings of sadness) according to the admission Record. A review of Resident 6's physician's order, dated 7/9/24, indicated an order for Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) for schizophrenia as evidenced by unprovoked agitation. An interview was conducted on 9/11/24 at 9:56 A.M. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3. LN 3 stated Resident 6 was alert, oriented, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of a medication error rate of five percent or greater when two routine medications were not available for one of three sampled residents (Resident 72) observed for medication administration. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 72's health. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included nutritional anemia (low red blood cells caused by a lack of either iron, protein, or vitamin B12), and muscle weakness. On 9/11/24 at 9:51 A.M., an observation of a medication pass was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 34. LN 34 was observed preparing, then administering Resident 72's 9 A.M. medications. A review of Resident 72's physician's orders indicated, cyanocobalamin (a vitamin used to prevent and treat low levels of vitamin B12) 5000 micrograms one capsule and Calcium 500 milligrams were due to be given every morning at 9…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify concerns related to unnecessary use of antipsychotic (drug used to treat clinical psychiatric symptoms or mental disorders) medication due to lack of indications. This failure had the potential for deficiencies to remain uncorrected and could result in residents being exposed to unnecessary medication side effects. (Cross reference F758) Findings: An interview was conducted on 9/12/24 at 4:17 P.M. with the Administrator (ADM), the Director of Nursing (DON), and Administrator in Training (AIT) regarding the facility's QAPI committee and their plans. The DON stated the psychotropic committee met to perform gradual dose reductions (GDR, a process of lowering the dose of psychotropic medications) and complete a Medication Review Regimen (MRR, a process to review any issues with ordered medications) for all residents on psychotropic medications. The information gathered from the psychotropic committee was then brought to QAPI. The DON acknowledged there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, the use of gowns, gloves, and face mask during resident care to prevent the transmission of bacteria) for one of four residents (Resident 211) reviewed for infection control. This failure had the potential to spread infectious organisms to Resident 211 and others. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 211 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease (a disease characterized by progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys). On 9/9/24 at 9:01 A.M., an observation was conducted inside Resident 211's room. Licensed Nurse (LN) 32 was observed wearing full Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, gown gloves and a mask) while providing care to Resident 211. There was no sign posted outside the room indicating the need to wear PPE. In addition, there was no PPE available outside the room. On 9/9/24 at 9:10 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 32.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) was provided care/treatment to prevent the worsening of pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence as a result of prolonged pressure) when: 1. Certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 removed Resident 1 ' s pressure ulcer dressings and the resident did not have his wounds covered while in bed. 2. Infection control was not maintained during pressure ulcer care when Resident 1 ' s open wounds were not re-cleansed after touching the resident ' s used bedding. 3. Resident 1 ' s pressure ulcer treatment orders were not followed. 4. Resident 1 ' s pressure ulcer treatment administration record (TAR) for November and December 2023 had blank entries and wound treatment could not be verified as having been done. As a result of these deficient practices, there was the potential for Resident 1 ' s pressure ulcers to worsen and/or become infected.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one licensed nurse (LN) 1 had the necessary competency (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) to perform pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence as a result of prolonged pressure) treatments for one of three residents (Resident 1). As a result of this deficient practice, there was the potential for Resident 1 ' s wound to deteriorate and/or become infected. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include quadriplegia (paralysis affecting all four limbs). A review of Resident 1 ' s wound provider assessment and treatment titled SNF Wound Care dated 1/18/24, indicated the resident had a pressure ulcer on the left buttock that extended into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dress one sampled resident in a dignified manner during a meal (31). This failure had the potential for Resident 31 to feel humiliated and isolated during meal time. Findings: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (blood sugar imbalance), heart failure, and Alzheimer's disease per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. During lunch observation on 6/8/21 at 11:55 A.M. in the Moss station, there were 10 residents sitting on their wheelchairs waiting for lunch including Resident 89. Resident 89 was observed leaning forward wearing a hospital gown with the gown untied and the back was exposed. On 6/8/21 at 12:09 P.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 10. CNA 10 stated when getting residents up for meals, residents should be washed, cleaned and dressed appropriately. On 6/8/21 at 12:11 P.M., a joint interview was conducted with CNA 11 and the DON. CNA 11 acknowledged he put a hospital gown on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medical information was secured and protected for one sampled resident (32). As a result, Resident 32's medical information was exposed to unauthorized people. Findings: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain) and quadriplegia (paralysis of the whole body) per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. An observation was conducted in the sub-acute area on 6/10/21 at 11:20 A.M. A medication cart parked next to room [ROOM NUMBER] had a form on top that indicated Sub acute vitals which contained nine resident names including Resident 32's. The form indicated the residents' tube feeding names, amount of water flush, resident's blood pressure, temperature, oxygen saturation, blood sugar and respiration values. On the same day, the following observations were done: At 11:32 A.M., two staff and a resident passed by the medication cart. At 11:33 A.M., one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure all ceiling vents were clean for one of twenty-four sampled residents, and one unsampled resident (resident 223, room [ROOM NUMBER]). As a result, there was an increased risk of poor air quality. Findings: On 6/8/21 at 10:40 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 223. Resident 223 stated, the ceiling vent was dirty, and he could see dirt and dust falling out of it. Clumps of dust were observed throughout the ceiling vent of Resident 223's room. On 6/8/21 at 11:05 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 44. Resident 44 stated, the air quality at the facility was bad, and he woke up in the morning with dust particles on him which came out of the vent. On 6/9/21 at 1:39 P.M., an observation was conducted of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The ceiling vent was covered with clumps of dust. On 6/11/21 at 2:40 P.M., an interview was conducted with the administrator. The administrator stated, the vents should not be full of dust because…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide requested grooming services to one of twenty-four sampled residents (44). As a result, Resident 44 had unwanted facial hair. Findings: Per the facility's Resident Face Sheet, Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction (one side of body is paralyzed due to a stroke). Per the facility's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/18/21, Resident 44 required extensive assistance with shaving. On 6/8/21 at 11:05 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 44. Resident 44 had unshaved hair on his neck. Resident 44 stated, he asked the staff to shave him each time they bathed him, but the staff often told him they didn't have time, and that they would shave him the next day, or the next time they bathed him. Resident 44 further stated, he did not want his neck to have hair, but the staff usually did not follow through when they said they would shave him…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of facility documentation, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination. In addition, the facility failed to take the necessary corrective action to ensure that pneumonia vaccinations were offered, discussed, and provided in accordance with the current CDC standards. This failure had the potential to affect all 124 residents who currently live in the facility (refer to F883). Findings: On 6/9/21 at 1:33 P.M., an interview was conducted with the ICP. The ICP stated the facility did not offer both pneumonia vaccines and the facility only gave, The 23 (PPSV23). On 6/10/21 at 9:15 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 14. LN 14 stated the facility only gave one kind of Pneumoccoccal vaccine which was the PPSV23. On 6/10/21 at 11:13 A.M., an interview was conducted with the QA nurse. The QA nurse stated she was not sure if there was another pneumococcal vaccine that the facility was giving. On 6/10/21 at 1:52…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure two staff wore the appropriate PPE when entering the room of one of one sampled residents on transmission based precautions. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff in the kitchen donned (put on) gloves appropriately, to prepare food. (dietary aide 1- DA 1) These failures had the potential to spread infection to other residents, and to cause foodborne illness among the facility residents. Findings: 1. On 6/9/21 at 1:15 P.M., an observation was conducted of the facility's Person Under Investigation (PUI) unit. A male staff was observed entering room [ROOM NUMBER] with a sign on the door that indicated yellow zone. The staff picked up a gown outside the room, went inside carrying the gown on his hand then closed the door. The staff was interrupted and opened the door still carrying the isolation gown in his hand. During interview, the male staff stated he would put the gown inside the room after sanitizing his hands because…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to offer 5 of 5 residents reviewed for flu/pneumonia vaccinations (Resident (R) 1, R2, R3, R4, R5) and/or their representatives, the opportunity for the resident to be vaccinated in accordance with nationally recognized standards. The facility failed to offer residents the opportunity to be vaccinated with PCV13 (pneumococcal vaccine- vaccine to prevent some cases of pneumonia, a respiratory disease) in accordance with CDC guidelines. Residents and/or their representatives were unable to share in clinical decision making with the medical provider as they were not given information or offered PCV 13. This failure to offer a recommended pneumococcal vaccination had the potential to place all 124 residents of the facility at risk for pneumonia. Findings: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Meadow Creek Post-AcuteParamount, CA 1 of 5Northbrooke Post AcuteJackson, TN 1 of 5River Pointe Post-AcuteCarmichael, CA 1 of 5Riverbank Post-AcuteRiverbank, CA 1 of 5Shelby Oaks Post AcuteMemphis, TN 1 of 5The Springs Post-AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Applingwood Post AcuteCordova, TN 2 of 5Clearwater Healthcare CenterStockton, CA 2 of 5Crystal Creek Post-AcuteStockton, CA 2 of 5Stillwater Post-AcuteEl Cajon, CA 2 of 5The Orchards Post-AcuteBakersfield, CA 2 of 5Westwood Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Baywood Post AcuteCampbell, CA 3 of 5Beach Creek Post-AcuteAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Cypress Grove Post AcuteJackson, TN 3 of 5Harborview Post AcuteMemphis, TN 3 of 5Lodi Creek Post AcuteLodi, CA 3 of 5The Bellefontaine Healthcare CenterPasadena, CA 3 of 5The Redwoods Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 3 of 5The Shores Post-AcuteSan Diego, CA 4 of 5Avondale Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5Canyon Creek Post-AcuteCastro Valley, CA 4 of 5Community Care CenterLa Mesa, CA 4 of 5Covington Post AcuteCovington, TN 4 of 5Encinitas Post-AcuteEncinitas, CA 4 of 5Stratford Villa Post-AcuteLivermore, CA 4 of 5The Grove Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 4 of 5West Tennessee Post AcuteJackson, TN 5 of 5Creekside Post-AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5The Ridge Post AcuteSan Jose, CA 5 of 5The Vineyards Healthcare CenterLivermore, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
TILFORD, TOBYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2023
RODRIGUEZ, CURTISIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$734K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 10%Other / private 33%

This home reported $734K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$500per resident / day
operating cost
$15,186per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$441per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055508. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next