The Bellefontaine Healthcare Center
150 Bellefontaine St, Pasadena, CA 91105 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (626) 796-1103 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,414 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-21)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 30.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.24 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.94 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 202 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 177 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.5%CMS range 45.0–56.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.9–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 5.3–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 118.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice (guidelines and expectations that define competent and ethical conduct within specific profession) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) who had a diagnosis of other sequalae of cerebral infarction (the long-term conditions and complications that result from brain tissue damage due to reduced blood supply), other interval disc (a cushion of cartilage found between the vertebrae (bones) of the spine) lumbar region (the lower back region of your spinal column or backbone), other spondylosis with radiculopathy - lumbar region (a condition where the degenerative changes of spondylosis [osteoarthritis of the spine] lead to compression of spinal nerve roots, resulting in radiculopathy symptoms. Spondylosis itself refers to the general wear and tear of the spine, while radiculopathy is the specific symptom of a pinched nerve) and status post (S/P- underwent surgery)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide three (3) of 3 sampled residents (Residents 11, 43, and 139) meal trays that were appetizing and palatable (agreeable to one's sense of taste).This failure had the potential to result in dissatisfaction, decreased food intake and place Residents 11, 43, and 139 at risk for unplanned weight loss. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of osteomyelitis (infection of the bone and bone marrow) and protein-calorie malnutrition (a dangerous state of undernutrition caused by a lack of both dietary protein and total calories). During a review of Resident 11'S Minimum Data Set (MDS – a resident assessment tool), dated 5/20/2026, the MDS indicated the resident had intact cognitive (ability to think, remember, and reason) skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 11 was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper food handling practices in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure: Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) wore a hairnet while inside the kitchen.Dietary Aide 2 (DA 2) perform hand hygiene between handling dirty dishes and clean dishes.One container of poultry seasoning was closed.One opened container of dill weed seasoning was labeled with an open and/or use by date.These failures had the potential for residents to be at risk for food-borne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria).These deficient practices have the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents, which could place the residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (caused by food contaminated with bacteria) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever) and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization.During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine drainage had an air gap (a vertical, unobstructed space between the ice machine's drain and the buildings drainage system that prevent contaminated drain water from flowing back into the machine's clean water supply. It is a safety measure, often a simple pipe fitting or a dedicated device, that acts as a barrier, with the most common requirement being a one to two - inch gap to comply with health and plumbing codes) to ensure no contact with outside contaminated (unfit for use, or unsafe) source as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential to result in backflow of contaminated water back to the ice machine and had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents, which could place the residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning; symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and fever) and can lead to other serous medical complications and hospitalization. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call light (a device used by a Resident to signal his or her need for assistance) was within reach for four (4) of six (6) sampled residents (Resident 37, 8, 113, and 137) who were reviewed for environment care area. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact on the psychosocial well-being (the individual's mental and emotional health and their social interactions and environment) of Residents 37, 8, 113, and 137 as a result in delayed provision of care and services. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 37 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis (a serious bone infection) of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region (affecting the spinal column at the base of the spine), unspecified lack of coordination (a broad clinical classification for individuals who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy to ensure the resident was free from unnecessary medication (medication prescribed or consumed without a valid clinical indication for an excessive duration, at too high a dose, or when their potential risks outweigh the benefits) use for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 57) reviewed for unnecessary medications, by failing to have a specific indication for Resident 57's use of lorazepam (Ativan- a medication used to treat anxiety disorder [a group of mental health conditions characterized by persistent, excessive, and uncontrollable fear, worry, or dread that interferes with daily life]). This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk for Resident 57 to experience adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) related to psychotropic medication (drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) admission Comprehensive Assessment (a clinical evaluation required for all new admission in skilled nursing homes) was completed within the required timeframe of 14 days after admission for two (2) of 25 sampled residents (Resident 141 and 137). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the provision of necessary care and services for Resident 141 and 37. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 141's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that indicated hepatic failure (a life threatening condition where the liver loses its ability to function adequately), dependence on renal dialysis (life sustaining treatment that performs the work of failing kidneys by filtering waste, toxins, and excess fluids from the blood), and heart failure (a condition where the heart muscle becomes too…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment and documentation of the resident's hearing ability were reflected in the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 73) reviewed for vision and hearing. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to not develop and implement a resident centered care plan for Resident 73 to receive care and services to maximize and/or improve Resident 73's functional ability in hearing.Findings:A review of Resident 73's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and a range of physical and cognitive symptoms that severely disrupt daily life), asthma (a chronic [long-term] lung disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized resident-centered care plan (a care plan that prioritizes the unique health needs and desired outcomes of the resident) with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions for two (2) of 25 sampled residents (Residents 73 and 2):Resident 73 did not have a care plan to address the resident's hard of hearing.Resident 2 did not have a care plan to address the resident's diagnosis of dementia (progressive state of decline in mental abilities).This deficient practice has the potential to delay in the necessary care and services for Resident 73 and 2.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 73 admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and a range of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a language communication board was placed at bedside for one (1) of (1) sampled resident (Resident 5) reviewed for language/communication area in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 5 experiencing a delay in receiving appropriate care and services due to the staff not being able to properly communicate with the resident.Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary language of Japanese. The admission Record also indicated Resident 5 was admitted with diagnoses that included general muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feeling of worry, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities). During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sample residents (Resident 73) reviewed for hearing care area received appropriate treatment to maintain the resident's hearing abilities by failing to ensure audiology (audiology is the branch of science and medicine concerned with the sense of hearing. Audiologists are health care professionals who diagnose, manage, and treat hearing, balance, or ear problems) appointment was arranged for the resident in accordance with physician's order.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 73 to have increased hearing loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 73 admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and a range of physical and cognitive symptoms that severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to set the low air loss mattress (LAL mattress, a specialized medical bed mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcers [localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence] by constantly blowing a tiny amount of air through the tiny holes) in accordance with the weight for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 117) reviewed for pressure ulcer. This deficient practice placed Resident 117 at risk for development of new pressure ulcers.Findings: During a review of Resident 117's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity) and protein calorie malnutrition (a condition that occurs when a person's body doesn't get the right amount of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the feet of one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Residents 20) reviewed for accident were placed on the wheelchair's footrest during wheelchair transport.This deficient practice placed Resident 20 at risk of injury and serious harm.Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lack of coordination, enthesopathy (any damage, disease or irritation at the exact spot where the tendons or ligaments attach to the bones) and bone density and structure disorder (thin and brittle bones [a physical state where bones become fragile, weak, and structurally compromised causing them to fracture or break much more easily than normal]. During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 5/7/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 20 had severe impairment in cognitive (mental action or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a trauma informed assessment (a structured clinical approach that evaluates how an individual's past and present trauma impacts their overall functioning, relationships, and well-being) for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 134) who has a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event). This deficient practice has the potential to affect Resident 134's psychological (relates to the mind, mental processes, and behavior) well-being and affects the resident's quality of life.Findings:During a review of Resident 134's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of PTSD, anxiety (an emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts, and physical changes like a rapid heartbeat), and depression (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 84) observed during medication pass received Metformin Hydrochloride (drug used to lower and control blood sugar levels in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus [DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing)] ) with meals as indicated on the physician's order and facility's policy. This deficient practice placed Resident 84 at risk for gastrointestinal (GI, involves the mouth, esophagus, stomach, small and large intestines, rectum and anus) side effects which included nausea, diarrhea, and stomach cramping. Findings: During a review of Resident 84's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 84 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 DM and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD- when a valve between the stomach and food pipe does not close tightly, letting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) dumpsters (a movable waste container) and 1 trash can were covered and closed per facility policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential to attract vermin (animals that are believed to be harmful, carry diseases such as rodents, parasitic worms, or insects), pests (any living thing that has a negative effect on humans), and wildlife (undomesticated animal species), increasing the risk of disease transmission and health issues for residents, staff, and the surrounding community.During an observation on 6/2/2026 at 7:35 AM outside to the left of the building next to the facility driveway, one gray trash can was observed overflowing with brown paper, plastic bags and a surgical mask with no cover or lid. One dumpster was also observed with the lid propped open with a cardboard box. During an interview on 6/3/2026 at 2:45 PM with Dietary Supervisor (DS), DS stated it is important that dumpster lids are not propped open because it is unsanitary. DS added that keeping the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures for two (2) of 25 sampled residents (Residents 4 and 137) as indicated in the facility policy by failing to ensure:Treatment Nurse 2 (TN 2) changed gloves and performed hand hygiene (washing hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, or using alcohol-based sanitizer, to effectively eliminate germs and prevent disease spread) after touching the privacy curtain (a ceiling-suspended fabric partition used to temporarily section off patient beds, exam areas, or treatment spaces to protect patient dignity, ensure confidentiality, and create semi-private spaces) and before continuing wound treatment for Resident 4.Certified Nursing Assistant 4 (CNA 4) doff (remove an item or clothing) and dispose of PPE and perform hand hygiene after providing peri-care (cleaning the genitals and anal area) to Resident 38.These failures had the potential to result in an increased risk for the spread of bacteria, viruses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic surveillance (is the continuous tracking and analysis of how antibiotics (medicines used to treat bacterial infections by killing bacteria or inhibiting their growth] are used and how bacteria are becoming resistant to them) data collection form was completed for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 134) who was receiving antibiotic therapy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 134 to be prescribed inappropriate antibiotic and increased the risk of developing antibiotic-resistant organisms (bacteria that are not controlled or killed by antibiotics).Findings:During a review of Resident 134's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of otitis media (middle ear infection or inflammation) of the right ear, bronchitis (an inflammation of the main airway/windpipe), and pneumonia (an infection/ inflammation in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY DPS:Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer an intravenous (IV -within a vein) medication at the prescribed infusion rate for one of two sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure resulted in Resident 3's Vancomycin (Vanco- a medication used to treat infections caused by bacteria) being administered slower than prescribed, with the potential to lead to ineffective treatment or bacterial resistance for Resident 3.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), gout (a painful form of arthritis [joint pain or swelling, stiffness, and tenderness] caused by too much uric acid [a waste product left over from normal chemical processes in the body] in the blood) and fracture (a crack or break in a bone) of the right femur (thigh bone) neck. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation of the urine output for one (1) of 2 sampled residents (Residents 1) with indwelling catheter (a flexible tube that passes through the urethra [a tube through which the urine leaves the body] and into the bladder to drain urine) in the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and urine output log in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in miscommunication among staff and resulted in the medical records inaccurate representation of care provided to Residents 1.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of urinary retention (inability to completely empty the bladder). During a review of Resident 1's order summary report dated 8/13/2025, the order summary report indicated an order to record indwelling catheter output in milliliter (ml - units of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the ampicillin (drug used to prevent and treat several bacterial infections) six (6) grams (gm - unit of measurement) every 12 hours intravenous piggyback (IVPB- a way to give a patient a dose of medicine directly into the vein through the existing line) was reconciled (formal process of creating the most accurate and complete list of resident's current medications from the previous health care facility or from home, and comparing that the list with the medications being prescribed by the physician of the receiving healthcare facility) and administered for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the ampicillin for the scheduled time frame while the resident is in the facility which potentially resulted in delayed healing of the resident's right knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI- an infection that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Advance Directive (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) policy to ensure the advance directive was in the chart for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 30 and Resident 222). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 30 and Resident 222 to not have their wishes met regarding life-sustaining treatment (any treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical condition) or health care. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD- irreversible kidney failure) and atherosclerotic heart disease (the buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery walls). During a review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Foods are stored in a manner that prevents foodborne illness (illness that comes from eating contaminated food) for residents. 2. All personnels in the kitchen, which includes outside maintenance, working on kitchen equipment, wore hair nets. These deficient practices have the potential to result in foodborne illness in a population of 103 residents who consume the food prepared by the facility every day. Findings: During an observation on 4/28/2025 at 8:05 a.m. in the walk-in refrigerator, the following items were found: 1. Sesame dressing received on 2/11/25 and opened at 2/25/25. 2. Multiple small cups of cranberry and orange juice on a large tray without a prepared date found on the cups or on the tray. During an interview on 4/28/2025 at 8:10 AM, [NAME] 1 (CK 1) stated the sesame dressing should only be good for one (1) month once opened and should be thrown after to prevent the residents from getting sick. During a concurrent interview and review of the facilities Dry Goods Storage from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures for three of 22 sampled residents (Residents 175, 173 and 271) as indicated on the facility policy by failing to ensure: 1. Treatment Nurse 1 (TN 1) doff (take off) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, protective clothing, goggles, or other garments to prevent or minimize exposure to and spread of infection or illness) and perform hand hygiene (cleaning hands to prevent germs) after repositioning Resident 175 and before continuing wound care treatment. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse 5 (LVN 5) doff PPE after administering medications to Resident 173 and before touching the medication cart. This deficient practice has the potential to spread infection to staff and residents. 3. Resident 271's indwelling catheter drainage bag (Foley catheter- a tube that allows urine to drain from the bladder into a drainage bag) was not touching the floor. This deficient practice had the potential to expose Resident 271 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 39) was treated with respect and dignity in accordance with the facility policy by failing to keep the resident's bed linen clean and free of food particles/ crumbs. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 3/8/2025, the MDS indicated resident was severely impaired (never/ rarely make decisions) with cognitive (the ability to understand and make decisions)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 22 sampled residents (Resident 223 and 53) were provided with the following in accordance with the facility's policy: 1. Resident 223's call light (device used by residents to call staff) was not within arm's reach. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 223 not to be able to call the facility staff for help or assistance, especially during an emergency. 2. Facility failed to ensure Resident 53's bed had a footboard (a flat board placed at the foot of a resident's bed to help maintain proper positioning and alignment, thereby preventing the feet from slipping off the bed). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact Resident 53's comfort and physical well-being due to improper positioning of the foot. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 223's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of post laminectomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide privacy and confidentiality (safeguarding the content of information including video, audio, or other computer stored information from unauthorized disclosure without the consent of the resident and/or the individual's surrogate or representative) for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 223) when Resident 223's medical records were left exposed by leaving the computer unattended and not turning off the computer screen on 5/1/2025. This deficient practice violated Resident 223's right to privacy and confidentiality. Findings: During a review of Resident 223's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 223 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included post laminectomy syndrome (chronic pain that persist after a laminectomy [surgical removal of the roof of the spinal canal] or other back surgery), arthrodesis status (when a joint has been surgically fused or fixed to prevent movement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessment of resident's medication on the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) for one (1) of 22 sampled residents (Resident 50) as indicated on the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to not develop and implement a resident centered care plan for Resident 50 to receive necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dislocation of left hip (when the ball at the end of the thighbone is pushed out of its socket in the pelvis), abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility, and hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fat particles in the blood). During a review of Resident 50's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 50 was assessed having intact memory and cognitive (mental action or process of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow through with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) recommendation to obtain a PASARR level II (a detailed assessment performed on individuals identified during a Level I PASSR screening as potentially having a serious mental illness [SMI], intellectual disability [ID], developmental disability [DD], or related condition [RC]) evaluation for one (Resident 84) of three sampled residents after receiving a Level II Notice of Attempted Evaluation Letter, dated 11/7/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate placement and unidentified specialized services for Resident 84. Findings: During a review of Resident 84's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 84 on 9/3/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the fluid restriction for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 102) as indicated on the physician's order. This deficient practice has the potential for Resident 102 to have fluid overload (a condition where the body has too much fluid which could lead to various symptoms, including swelling, shortness of breath, and weight gain). Findings: During a review of Resident 102's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF- a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling) and chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter as well as they should). During a review of Resident 102's Care Plan initiated on 2/12/2025, the Care Plan indicated Resident 102 was at risk for heart failure with an approach plan to encourage 1200 cc fluid restriction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper application of resting hand splint (provide support and rest to the hand and wrist, particularly during periods of rest or sleep to help reduce pain, swelling, stiffness, and contractures [shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints]) and elbow splint (a support or brace that helps stabilize and protect the elbow joint) for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 56) with limited range of motion (ROM - movement of the joints) as indicate on the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications such as pain, swelling, and contractures) to Resident 56's right arm, fingers and wrist. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of contracture (a stiffening/shortening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy to post a No Smoking sign outside the room of one of two sampled residents (Resident 222) while the oxygen was in use. This deficient practice had the potential to cause fire which could harm the residents, staff, and visitors at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 222's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of asthma (a condition in which a person's airways become inflamed, narrows, swells, and produces extra mucus, which makes it difficult to breathe). During a review of Resident 222's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 4/15/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 222 had an intact cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decision making. The MDS also indicated Resident 222 required substantial assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of three sampled residents (Resident 62) in accordance with the facility policy by failing to administer cholecalciferol (a dietary supplement used to treat Vitamin D deficiency) and Miralax (a medication used to treat occasional constipation [difficult bowel movement]) as indicated on the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 62 to experience constipation, muscle weakness, and bone and joint pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 62's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 62 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encounter for attention to gastrostomy (the care and maintenance of an artificial opening into the stomach, typically a gastrostomy tube [G-tube]), respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs are unable to adequately deliver oxygen to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%). Two (2) medication errors (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which are not in accordance with the prescriber's order; manufacturers specifications / accepted professional standards and principles) out of 33 opportunities (observed administered medications) for error which yielded a facility medication error rate of 6.06 percent for one of three sampled residents (Resident 62) observed during medication administration (med pass). Licensed Vocational Nurse 8 (LVN 8) failed to administer cholecalciferol (a dietary supplement used to treat Vitamin D deficiency) and Miralax (a medication used to treat occasional constipation [difficult bowel movement) once daily as indicated in the Physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse reactions (an undesired harmful effect resulting from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly provide dental services for one of two sampled residents (Resident 46) as in accordance with the facility's Dental Services policy. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 46 having pain when wearing dentures, poor food intake from inability to effectively chew food and had the potential to result in weight loss, lack of energy, and loss of muscle mass. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 46 on 6/17/2020 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), protein-calorie malnutrition (state of inadequate intake of food as a source of protein[builds, maintains, and replaces the tissues in the body], calories [unit of measurement for the energy contained n food], and other essential nutrients [chemical compounds in food that are used by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food brought in by family met the prescribed diet and ensure food safety requirements for one (Resident 66) of three sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in electrolyte (crucial for various bodily functions, including maintaining fluid balance, regulating muscle and nerve function, and supporting heart health) imbalances, fluid overload (medical condition where there is too much fluid in the body), and food borne illnesses (food poisoning) to Resident 66 that can lead to other serious complications and hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 66's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted the resident on 1/29/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic kidney disease stage five (final stage of kidney failure, also known as end stage renal disease [ESRD]), dependence on hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the bed was in locked position for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) who fell on 4/4/2025 around 9 am and was high risk for fall (to drop or descend under the force of gravity, as to a lower place through loss or lack of support) as indicated on the resident ' s care plan. This deficient practice had the potential to result in serious injuries or death in an event of another fall. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limit tomuscle weakness, osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and Vitamin D) and high blood pressure. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 3/13/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light device (one of the major communication technologies that link nursing home staff to the needs of residents) was within reach (an arm's length) for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 2 and 3). This had the potential to result in a delay in care for Resident 2 and 3 and not receive the necessary care and services which can lead to illness or serious injury. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 2's admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 8/2/24 with diagnosis which include fall on the same level, dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 07/28/24, indicated Resident 2 was severely impaired with cognitive (processes of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain safe, clean, comfortable sanitary and home like environment for one (2) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 3 and 4) by not ensuring that Resident 3 and 4's trash can was not overflowing, and there were no clutters on the floor. These deficient practices caused an unsanitary and had a potential for residents to be placed at risk for injury. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 3's admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 10/26/2023 with diagnosis which include quadriplegia (a condition where all four limbs experience paralysis), respiratory failure, and hyperlipidemia (an excess of lipids or fats in your blood). During a review of Resident 3's Fall Assessment (checks your risk of falling) dated 1/6/2024 score was 17 which means Resident 3 was at risk for fall. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 6/21/2024, indicated Resident 3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss mattress (LAL mattress, designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcer [localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue caused by prolonged pressure]) for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1) was switched on. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1's pressure ulcer to worsen and for the resident to develop new pressure injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/22/2023. Resident 1's diagnoses lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and dementia (the loss of the ability to think, remember, and reason to levels that affect daily life and activities). During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report order date 2/23/2024 indicated: Treatment: LAL mattress for pressure distribution and skin integrity management every shift. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 5/20/2024 indicated Resident 1 was severely impaired with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of Resident 84's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 84 on 3/18/2021 with diagnoses which include muscle weakness, lack of coordination, hypertension (when the pressure in the resident ' s blood vessels is too high). A review of Resident 84's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 84 was moderately impaired with cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 84 substantial/ maximum assistance (helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or hold trunks or limbs and provide more than half the effort) on toilet hygiene, shower /bathe self, personal hygiene. A review of Resident 84's Order Summary Report, dated 2/25/2024, indicated Low bed to decrease potential for injury. A review of Resident 84's Care Plan, revised 11/21/23, indicated Resident 84 was high risk for falling related to poor safety awareness, decrease strength endurance, unsteady gait, visual deficit, and history of fall. The care plan intervention included was for the facility staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Residents 79 and 85) who are on oxygen therapy (supplemental oxygen, a treatment that provides you with extra oxygen to breath) by: 1. Facility failed to ensure Resident 79's nasal cannula (NC; a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose) oxygen tubing connected to their oxygen tank was stored in a bag and not sprawled out along the Resident 79 ' s wheelchair seat and touching the wheelchair wheels and failed to ensure that the resident ' s humidified (increased moisture) oxygen nasal cannula tubing was not touching the floor when in use. 2. Facility failed to ensure Resident 85's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) has an order, and CPAP mask was stored in a bag when not in used on 5/13/2024 and 5/16/2024. This failure had the potential to result in Resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure control and accountability of Controlled Substance (CS- medications which have a potential for abuse and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence) awaiting final disposition (process of returning and/or destroying unused medications) when the facility's Narcotic and Hypnotic Record (also known as CS) accountability logs for March 2024 and May 2024 did not include the verifying signatures of either the Director of Nursing (DON) or a Registered Nurse (RN) along with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), as indicated on the facility policy and procedures. This deficient practice increased the opportunity for CS diversion (the transfer of a controlled substance or other medication from a lawful to an unlawful channel of distribution or use) and accidental exposure of residents to harmful medications, potentially negatively impacting their health and wellbeing. Findings: A record review on 5/15/2024 at 1:58 PM, with the DON, the Narcotic and Hypnotic Record accountability logs for March and May 2024 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross referenced with 656 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include appropriate monitoring to ensure resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (any medication in excessive dose, excessive duration, without adequate monitoring) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 119) by failing to monitor Resident 119 for sign and symptoms of bleeding for the use of Eliquis (a medication used for atrial fibrillation [a condition with irregular, fast heart rate caused by poor blood flow,]) for 15 days. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Residents 119 to receive suboptimal (less than the highest standard or quality) care, experience serious adverse consequences (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) possibly resulting in bleeding, hospitalization, or death. Findings: A review of Resident 119's admission Record (a document containing demographic and diagnostic information) indicated Resident 119 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices in accordance with their policy and procedure by failing to ensure: 1. Food in the kitchen were labeled with item name, date opened and expiration date. 2. Prepared food are dated correctly. 3. Various food containers are sealed properly. 4. Expired food was removed from the shelves and discarded. 5. Juice machine log was updated. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents, which could place the residents at risk for developing foodborne illness ([food poisoning] with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever) and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: During concurrent observation in the facility's kitchen on 5/13/2024 at 7:46 AM with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated the bag of chocolate cookies was not labeled with best by date. The DS stated the milk container was dirty and was not labeled with open date and expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure titled, Advance Directive (a written statement of a resident's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the resident be unable to communicate) for two of seven (7) sampled residents (Residents 102 and 324) by not ensuring a copy of the resident's Advance Directive was readily accessible in their medical chart. This failure had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care and nursing staff not knowing if Resident 102 had specific wishes to follow in case of an emergency. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 102's admission Record, indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral ischemia (acute [sudden onset] brain injury that results from impaired blood flow to the brain) and sepsis (a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body damages its own tissues and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean comfortable, sanitary, and home like environment for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents (Resident 47) by not ensuring that Resident 47 ' s bathroom toilet was free of fecal matter. This deficient practice caused an unsanitary environment and had a potential for Resident 27 to be placed at risk for infection injury. Findings: A review of Resident 47 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 47 on 9/11/2017 with the diagnoses that included muscle weakness, abnormal posture, hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high). A review of Resident 47 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 3/30/2024, indicated Resident 47 was assessed to need substantial maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) on toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS indicated Resident 47 was dependent (helper does all the effort) on toilet transfer (ability to get on and off the toilet or commode. During concurrent observation in Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross referenced with F656 and F758 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool) by including a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by disordered thinking, behaviors, and emotions that impairs daily functioning) for one of two residents sampled (Resident 119) without evidence to support this as an established diagnosis in the resident's clinical record. The deficient practice increased the risk for Resident 119 not to receive the care and treatment according to resident's needs possibly leading to a decline in overall health and well-being of the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 119's admission Record (a document containing demographic and diagnostic information) indicated Resident 119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including schizophrenia. A review of Resident 119's Medication Administration Record (MAR - a record of mediations administered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident centered care plan for two of 23 sampled residents (Residents 103 and 119) as indicated on the facility policy and procedure by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 103 had a care plan to address Resident 103's use of Donepezil (medication used to treat dementia [a brain disorder that affects the ability to remember, think clearly, communicate, and perform daily activities]) and monitoring of cerebrovascular accidents (CVA, an interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain by thinning the blood) prophylaxis (PPX, action taken to prevent disease) use of plavix (medication used to prevent CVA and Deep Vein thrombosis [DVT, a condition when a blood clot forms in one or more of the deep veins in the body]) 2. Resident 119 had a care plan which included measurable goals and outcomes for monitoring atrial fibrillation (a condition with irregular, fast heart rate caused by poor blood flow), use of Eliquis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services for two (2) out of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 323 and 53) in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure when: 1. Facility did not inform the primary physician of Resident 323 ' s rashes on both arms and back on 5/12/2024 and was not referred to dermatology (involves the study, research, diagnosis, and management of any health conditions that may affect the skin, fat hair, nails, and membranes) for further treatment as indicated in the care plan. 2. The facility failed to inform Resident 53 ' s primary physician (MD) that Resident 53 has been refusing to elevate his right leg on a pillow and to verify with the MD if resident needs an order for Thrombo-Embolic Deterrent (TED hose, specially designed knee-high, thigh-high, or waist-high stockings that help prevent blood clots and swelling in your legs). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in reducing the swelling in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow Physician Order and implement care plan interventions to provide care and services for one (1) of four sampled residents (Resident 68) by failing to ensure: Resident 68's head of bed (HOB) was elevated to at least 30 degrees while receiving g-tube (gastrostomy tube-a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) feedings. This failure had the potential for Resident 68 to be at risk for aspiration (a condition in which food, liquids, saliva, or vomit enters the airway or lungs) pneumonia which could result in harm, serious illness, or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 68's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 68 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address the use of Trazadone (used to treat major depressive disorder [a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest], anxiety disorders [persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities], and insomnia [hard to fall asleep, hard to stay asleep]) order, on the medication regimen review (MRR, or Drug Regimen Review, a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication) for one of five sampled Residents (Resident 61) in accordance with the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential for unnecessary medication administered to Residents 61, which could result to serious harm. Findings: A review of Resident 61's admission Record indicated an initial admission to the facility on 8/5/2021, and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses of major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents 119 and 61) were free from unnecessary use of psychotropic drug (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) in accordance with the facility policy and procedure by failing to ensure : 1. Resident 119 had a specific, measurable target behaviors related to the use of Quetiapine (antipsychotic [medication used to treat mental illness]) to ensure resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (any medication in excessive dose, excessive duration, without adequate monitoring). 2. Resident 61 was monitored for hours of sleep for the use of Trazadone (used to treat major depressive disorder [a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest], anxiety disorders [persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities], and insomnia [hard to fall asleep, hard to stay asleep]). This deficient practice had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five (5) of seven (7) cereal prepared in a bowl were accurately measured using a measuring cup. These deficient practice had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction, decreased nutritional intake and weight loss or gain of the five residents. Findings: During an observation in the facility's kitchen on 5/14/2024 at 6:20 AM, observed Kitchen Staff (KS 1) scooping cereal on her right hand with gloves transferring it to 5 brown bowls. During interview on 5/16/2024 at 9:10 AM with KS1, KS 1 stated when we measure the cereal, it should be measured using a measuring cup and it is important to follow serving size so the resident can have proper caloric intake. KS 1 also stated the facility has some residents who must gain weight and some who must lose weight and if the facility do not follow the portion size, the residents would not gain or lose the necessary weight. During the same interview on 5/16/2024 at 9:10 AM with KS 1, KS 1 stated it was 5 residents who requested corn flakes on Tuesday,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 20) had the mental capacity (ability to understand the nature and consequences of a decision and to communicate a decision) to understand the terms of the facility's arbitration agreement (a private agreement that allows individual parties to resolve disputes rather than in a lawsuit) and failed to explain the arbitration to Resident 20's legal representative. This failure resulted in Resident 20 and his legal representative, the conservator (a judge-appointed person to act or decide for a conservatee [a person who needs help]), not understanding their rights to make informed decisions and choices about important aspects of Resident 20's health, safety, and welfare. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 20 on 9/17/2018 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding inside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep one (1) of three (3) washing machines in good repair. This failure had the potential to result in the washing machine not being in a safe operable condition. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/16/2024 at 9:05 AM with Infection Preventionist (IP) in the dirty laundry room, a washing machine on the furthest left side of the room was observed to have a large gash like hole on the top of the left panel of the washing machine. IP stated that hopefully they'll be able to fix it soon. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/16/2024 at 1:30 PM with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) in the dirty laundry room, a washing machine on the furthest left side of the room was observed to have a large gash like hole near the top of the left side panel of the washing machine. MS stated that a tube that runs through the top side of the washing machine that contains the sanitizing chemicals had leaked at one point and caused the left side panel to erode (to slowly reduce or destroy) causing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a resident when in need) was within the resident's reach (arm's length) for one (1) of 23 sampled residents (Resident 324). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 324 not being able to call the facility's staff for help or assistance especially during an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 324's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 324 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM- a chronic condition that occurs when blood sugar levels are too high), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), and history of falling. During a review of Resident 324's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 5/2/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 324…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-16 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Posted Nurse Staffing (Nurse Staffing Information) posted was accurate in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure by failing to reflect the correct total number and actual hours of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care. This deficient practice had the potential for the Nurse Staffing Information not to be available to the residents and visitors at any given time. Findings: During a concurrent record review of the Nurse Staffing Information, dated 5/10/2024, and interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 5/15/2024 at 3:19 PM, the DSD stated the Nurse Staffing Information indicated, eight (8) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) are working for 10:30 PM to 6:30 AM shift instead of actual count of seven (7) CNAs who worked for that shift. During a concurrent record review of the Nurse Staffing Information, dated 5/11/2024, and interview with the DSD on 5/15/2024 at 3:25 PM, the DSD stated the Nurse Staffing Information indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,414 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $14,414 — penalty dated 2025-05-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FORBRIGHT BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 02/01/2024 |
| RODRIGUEZ, CURTIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| TILFORD, TOBY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| LINKS SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| BEARDSLEY, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| BERNHOLZ, VICTORIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| CARTER, MELISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| CHAPMAN, MAYNOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| EHMAN, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| FROJELIN, ANTONETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| PENUELA, LEIZL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056080. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.