Rehabilitation Center of Allison

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 45.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.447 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, resident, and staff interviews, the facility didn't provide necessary treatment and services for a skin tear for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #5). Staff failed to implement physician treatment orders for 10 days, which resulted in the wound bed deteriorating and the surrounding skin becoming soft and broken down. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include:Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She understood others and made herself understood. She didn't show behaviors or resist care. The MDS documented she required partial to moderate assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) and showed no skin issues. Resident #5 had falls without injury and falls with non-major injuries. Her diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (stroke) and chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-05-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy/procedure, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received a timely medical evaluation and assessment following a fall, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The failure resulted in harm to Resident #1, who sustained a right hip fracture and experienced severe, prolonged pain for two days before receiving surgical treatment. The facility identified a census of 40 residents. Findings include:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1 sometimes understood others and others sometimes understood Resident #1. No behaviors existed and Resident #1 didn't resist cares. Resident #1 had a joint movement (range of motion) limitation to the lower leg. Resident #1 depended on staff for bathroom cleaning (toileting hygiene) and needed substantial to maximal help to move from one surface to another…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, policy review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 4 resident reviewed. (Resident #6 and Resident #7). The facility identified a census of 40 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She understood others, made herself understood, and didn't show behaviors. Resident #6 depended on staff for toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and transfers. She required supervision for personal hygiene and used a wheelchair independently. Her diagnoses included cancer, heart failure (the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), and depression.The Care Plan with a target date of 6/30/26, documented Resident #6 preferred to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility didn't ensure timely notification of incidents to the legal representative or the Hospice provider for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severely cognitively impaired. She understood others and made herself understood. She didn't show behaviors. Resident #2 required partial to moderate assistance from staff for toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. She performed transfers and ambulation (walking) independently. She had two falls without injury and one fall with a minor injury. Diagnoses included heart failure (heart pumping problem), hypertension (high blood pressure), Alzheimer's Disease (progressive brain disorder), and non-alzheimer's dementia (cognitive decline).The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility didn't ensure 2 of 4 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #7) received showers in accordance with their Plan of Care (POC). The facility identified a census of 40 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She understood others and made herself understood without behaviors. She depended on staff for shower/bathing. Her diagnoses included cancer, heart failure (pumping problem), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), and depression.On 4/29/26 at 11:30 AM, Resident #6 stated she only gets 1 shower a week and wanted 2 showers a week.The Plan of Care (POC) with a target date of 6/30/26, documented Resident #6 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) (everyday tasks) related to poor eyesight, impaired mobility, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure one 2 of 5 residents received adequate supervision to protect against hazards in the environment. (Resident #1 and Resident #4). Record review and staff interviews revealed Resident #1 room door required to be open and on 4/19/26, Resident #1 had his room door closed, was yelling for help and was found by staff sitting on the floor with complaints of right knee pain and sustained a right hip fracture. Record review and staff interviews revealed Resident #4 required assistance of two staff for transfer. On 4/22/26, one nursing staff person assisted Resident #4 to transfer. The resident lost balance and fell backwards onto the floor. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severely cognitively impaired. He understood others…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, call light logs and the facility policy/procedure, the facility staff failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner (no longer than 15 minutes) for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #4, #6 and Resident #7). The facility identified a census of 40 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She understood others and made herself understood. She didn't show behaviors or resist care. Resident #4 required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLS) (everyday tasks). She showed frequent incontinence (loss of control) of urine and occasional incontinence of bowel. Her diagnoses included heart failure (pumping problem), hypertension (high blood pressure), non-Alzheimer's dementia (brain function decline), history of falling, and abnormalities of gait (walking pattern) and mobility.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 6/24/25 at 9:28 AM Resident #143 was noted to have multiple days' worth of facial hair growth. At that time, he explained he preferred to be clean shaven. Further explained he had a shower scheduled later that morning and would like to be shaven at that time. On 6/24/25 at 4:01 PM Resident #143 explained he did have his shower but the CNA failed to shave him. The Care Plan for interventions for Resident #143 included the information that historically he likes to be clean shaven. During an interview on 6/25/25 at 11:05 AM, Staff C explained men should be shaven daily. During observations on 6/25/25 at 10:22 AM and 6/26/25 at 8:51 AM the resident remained unshaven. During an interview on 6/26/25 at 10:24 AM Staff A explained men should be asked if they want to shave daily. On 6/26/25 at 10:26 AM, Staff A and the surveyor went to Resident #143's room. Staff A acknowledged the facial hair growth. She asked the Resident if he prefers to be clean shaven. He explained he asked to be shaved a couple days ago, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, personnel files review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to prevent a staff member alleged of potential abuse of a resident (Resident #31) from contact with other residents. The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include: Resident #31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 14 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented Resident #31 as independent (Resident completes the activity by themselves with no assistance from a helper for self-care.) for eating, oral hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and mobility. The MDS documented Resident #31 required supervision or touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and /or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity. Assistance may be provided throughout the activity or intermittently) for shower/bathe self and tub/shower transfers. The MDS included diagnoses of coronary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse. The facility failed to conduct resident and staff interviews for the date of the incident to determine the extent of the allegation or determine if other residents had been affected. The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include: Resident #31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented Resident #31 as independent (Resident completes the activity by themselves with no assistance from a helper for self-care.) for eating, oral hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and mobility. The MDS documented Resident #31 required supervision or touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and /or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity. Assistance may be provided throughout the activity or intermittently) for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on schedule review, time card review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for eight (8) consecutive hours per day as required by the Federal Regulations. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: According to a calendar dated February 2025 compared to Attendance on Demand forms dated 2/1/25 through 2/28/25, the facility failed to staff an RN on 2/8/25 as required. During an interview 3/14/25 at 3:20 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed 2/8/25 as the only day she couldn't account for the required 8 hours of RN coverage.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to implement Care Plans for two (2) of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #2). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: 1. The Care Plan Focus with a target date of 4/25/25 identified Resident #1 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #1 used a wheelchair for mobility and cognitive impairment. She liked to have her stuffed animals with her. Resident #1 chose to wear a pair of safety glasses that aren't prescription. She used a foot bolster on her wheelchair pedals to keep her feet up. a. Resident #1 transferred with assistance from 2 staff and a lift device for all transfers. On 3/14/25 at 1:03 PM observed with the Director of Nursing (DON), Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and Staff B, CNA, as they placed a gait belt assistive device on Resident #1, then transferred her from the wheelchair to her bed with the assistance of 2 staff and no lift device. According to an email dated 3/21/25 at 1:18 PM the DON, present at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 61 rows in the source record cover these 37 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $529K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA