Northgate Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 41.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.97 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — widespread
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff, doctor, pharmacist interview, and policy review the facility failed to have 4 of 7 nurses administer medications following the 6 rights of medication administration. The 6 rights are a process of verifying the right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, right time, and right documentation performed to systematically minimize medication errors, ensure patient safety, and maintain the efficacy of treatment. By verifying these key factors, healthcare providers prevent adverse events, protect residents, and adhere to safety protocols. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff B, LPN, Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN), and Staff G, LPN administered medications for residents who resided in the facility on the morning of 2/22/26 and morning of 2/27/26 without following the proper medication administration procedures by administering medications which were pre-set (set up in advance of being administered). The residents' medications included insulin, blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interview, facility video, and facility policy review the facility failed to properly assess and intervene for 2 of 3 residents reviewed, (Residents #3 and #8). The facility identified a census of 45 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 7/24/25 indicated Resident #3 had diagnosis that included Non-Traumatic Brain Dysfunction, Alzheimer's Disease, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and a Retinal Vascular Occlusion. The assessment indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 (cognitively impaired), with delusions, ambulated with a walker, required supervision to touch assistance with transfers and ambulation and with two (2) falls since reentry to the facility on 2/25/25. A Care Plan included the following Focus and Interventions: a. I have impaired visual function related to (r/t) blindness in my right eye. b. The resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's). 1. Ambulation - Supervision with assistance of one (1) staff member. c. At risk for falls.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff, and pharmacist interviews, and policy review the facility failed to store medications in the pharmacy labeled package for all residents on 2 of 8 days of the survey. The facility also failed to keep insulin pens in a locked container/cart/room and keep narcotic in a double locked container/cart/room. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: An observation on 2/22/26 at 7:17 AM revealed the facility had two (2) medication carts (South cart and North cart) in the building that contained all residents oral daily medications. The South cart had 21 plastic cups with pill medications inside them and white paper cups with names written on them, in the top drawer of the cart. The North cart had 18 plastic plastic cups with medications inside them and white paper cups with names written on them, in the top drawer of the cart. There were also 6 insulin pens in an unlocked container sitting at the nurse's station pre-dialed up to dosages with insulin needles on. There were also 3 more insulin pens sitting in the same container not dialed up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-04 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to make a good faith attempt and ensure effective quality assurance processes regarding significant medication errors when a deficient practice with F760, Residents are Free of Significant Medication Errors, was cited at the facility for 3 of 4 onsite surveys, which included the current survey, since 9/1/2024. The facility reported a census of 44 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of Form CMS-2567 (the official document produced after a state or federal inspection (survey) that included survey results) for the survey ending on 9/22/2024 documented the facility was cited for F760 relating to 1 of 3 residents received 6 medications that were not prescribed for him and was hospitalized overnight for observation. 2. Review of Form CMS-2567 for the survey ending on 11/14/2025 documented the facility was cited for F760 relating for 2 of 3 residents who had significant medication errors. One resident received 5 medications that were not prescribed to them and another resident continued to receive medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to implement infection control measures when 6 of 6 morning insulins were stored together in a container (Resident #30, #14, #43, #19, #2, and #4). The facility also failed to provide Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (an infection control strategy for nursing homes and long-term care facilities to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms, It involves using gowns and gloves during high-contact care for residents with wounds, indwelling devices, or known multi-drug resistant organism colonization) directs during wound care (Resident #37). The facility also failed complete routine glove change and hand hygiene during pressure ulcer care after cleaning the wound for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: 1. An observation on 2/22/26 at 7:18 AM at the nurses station revealed 6 insulin pens were being stored with their lids off and touching in a plastic unlocked container with a blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide informed consent regarding the risk and benefits for as needed psychotropic medications (medications that affect brain activity, influencing mood, thoughts, behavior, and perception to treat mental health conditions) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for antipsychotic medications (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 44 residents.Findings include: Review of Resident #7's Progress Notes written by his Doctor on 12/17/25 documented he continues to benefit from his medication ziprasidone (an antipsychotic given by a shot called an Intramuscular (IM) injection) and ABHR (ativan, benadryl, haldol, reglan) gel (a compounded gel medication that goes on the skin, containing Ativan/lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication), Benadryl/diphenhydramine (anti-histamine medication), Haldol/haloperidol (antipsychotic medication), and Reglan/metoclopramide (anti-dopaminergic) (a medication that blocks dopamine receptors, preventing dopamine from binding and reducing its activity)). Review of Resident #7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were in place and anti-psychotics were used to treat relevant diagnoses and not a behavior (agitation) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #38). The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: 1. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #38 documented Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia with other behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and unspecified depression. Per this assessment, the resident had no hallucinations, no delusions, no physical or verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, no other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others, no rejection of care exhibited, and no wandering exhibited. Review of Resident #38's Medication Review Report signed by his Doctor on 1/28/26 indicated he had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to code 1 of 2 residents catheter (Resident #38), 1 of 1 resident pressure ulcer (Resident #37), and 1 of 2 residents Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) outcome (Resident #8) on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to reflect their current status at the time of the MDS assessment. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include:1. Resident #38's Medication Review Report signed by his doctor on 1/28/26 revealed an active order to continue use a of his catheter that started on 8/15/25. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #38 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented a diagnosis of obstructive uropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract that hinders urine flow, causing it to back up into the kidneys and leading to potential damage), and that he did not have a catheter. 2. Resident #37's Wound Evaluation, dated 12/2/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide care routine skin monitoring to cancerous lesions on the scalp and resident requested assessment/treatment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident #36). The facility also failed to maintain documentation that Neurological assessments (often called neuro checks) were performed after unwitnessed falls for 3 of 7 falls that indicated a need for neuro assessment monitoring (to detect serious, hidden brain injuries that might not be obvious right away, because bleeding or swelling in the brain can develop slowly over hours or even days, these tests are repeated to monitor for changes in a person's condition) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for fall with major injury (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #36 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide restorative programs as directed for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for restorative and develop/implement a restorative treatment policy for the facility to follow (Resident #36 and #7). The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #36 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed she needed supervision/touching assistance to walk 10 feet but could not walk greater than 50 feet due to medical condition or safety concerns and needed partial to moderate assistance by staff when she used her manual wheelchair for distance greater than 50 feet. The resident had impairment on one side to her upper and lower extremity that interfered with daily function or placed her at risk for injury. The MDS documented diagnoses of cancer, hypertension and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to complete a root cause analysis after each fall to ensure an intervention to prevent future falls was put in place, and failed to ensure the intervention was related to the reason the fall occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for fall with major injury (Resident #7). The facility also failed to update the Care Plan timely related to falls for Resident #7. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 8 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he was dependent on staff for walking and moving to desired locations in his wheelchair and was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. The MDS also documented diagnoses of seizure disorder, anxiety, intellectual disabilities, and dementia with psychotic disturbances. Review of Resident #7's current Care Plan on 2/25/26 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility video review, resident interview, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices during direct resident cares for 3 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #1, #3 and #4) The facility identified a census of 45 residents.Findings includeAn observation of the facilities video coverage dated 10/17/25 revealed Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) as she washed and gloved her hands prior to the removal of a supportive boot and wound dressing on the left foot/leg of Resident #4. The staff member then performed the prescribed physician treatment to the resident's upper left heel and the tips of her toes with the same gloved hands. Following completion of the treatment Staff J placed the non-used and/or prescribed treatment supplies in a plastic bag and placed the plastic bag back into the resident's treatment supply basin without sanitization of the surface areas. During an interview on 10/28/25 at 4:20 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the above documented observation. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$87,160 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $87,160 — penalty dated 2026-03-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 55 rows in the source record cover these 34 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $594K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA