Harmony Utica Ridge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 355 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 93.9 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a wound assessment and intervention for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #16). A bandage over a wound to the right buttocks on Resident #16 was identified by nursing staff on [DATE] without prior documentation and without provider notification for a treatment order. Resident #16 required hospitalization on [DATE] for sepsis, an infected wound, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Escherichia coli (E.coli) and a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Resident #16 expired on [DATE]. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy to the health and safety of residents who resided at the facility. The facility identified a census of 89 residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of [DATE] on [DATE] at 10:00 AM. The facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] by implementing the following actions: 1. Nurse education…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family and staff interview and facility failed to supervise and ensure a compromised resident (left sided weakness/paralysis) was safe from accidents when turned in bed, and the result was the subdural hematoma and death. (Resident #14). The facility reported a census of 99 residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 2/22/24 at 1:50 PM. The IJ began on 2/20/24. Facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on 2/22/24 at 4:34 PM by completing the following; a. At the direction of the center Quality Assessment and Assurance (QA&A) Committee, an investigation was initiated which included interviewing employees and interviewing like residents residing in the center beginning 2/20/24. b. A QAA meeting was held to review the incident and gather information on 2/20/24 and an addition QAA meeting was held on 2/21/24 to review and determine immediate action necessary and performance improvement plan. Like Residents identified as those residing in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to use non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of a medication prescribed for anxiety which caused for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #8) reviewed for chemical restraints to experience hypersomnolence (excessive sleepiness). The facility reported a census of 91.Findings includeReview of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included depression, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression, and insomnia.Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/09/24, revealed a Focus area to address Resident is at risk for pain related to diagnosis neuropathy and history of bilateral BKA (below knee amputation). Interventions included, in part:a. Encourage/Assist to reposition frequently to position of comfort. Initiated: 10/09/24.b.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document the outcome of weekly skin assessments and implement a new wound care order in a timely manner for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility reported a census of 91.Findings include:Stage 1 Pressure Injury: Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin Intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema (redness). In darker skin tones, the PI may appear with persistent red, blue, or purple hues. The presence of blanchable erythema or changes in sensation, temperature, or firmness may precede visual changes. Color changes of intact skin may also indicate a deep tissue PI (see below).Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer: Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis Partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis, presenting as a shallow open ulcer. The wound bed is viable, pink or red, moist, and may also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Adipose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve the correct portion size of the protein entree for 8 of 9 (Resident #1, #31, #43, #54, #77, #79, #89 and #96) residents with a mechanical soft diet order. The facility identified a census of 89 residents.Findings include:Review of the Week 1 Wednesday Noon Menu, approved by the Dietician directed to provide a 3- ounce (oz) portion of pork loin for the mechanical altered diet. The Diet Roster listed Resident #1, #31, #43, #54, #77, #79, #89 and #96 as receiving a mechanically altered diet. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Matrix provided by the facility listed Resident's #43 and #96 as having significant weight loss. During an observation of the Crow Creek Dining Room on 5/13/26 from the start of meal at 11:38 AM until 12:29 PM, Staff O, [NAME] used a #16 (2 Oz.) scoop to serve the ground pork loin to eight residents on the mechanical soft diet. During an interview on 5/13/26 at 12:56 PM, Staff O, [NAME] stated she used a #16 scoop for the ground pork…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, kitchen record review, facility policy review, the US Food Code (2017) and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary equipment in the main kitchen and in a kitchenette. The facility identified a census of 89 residents.Findings include:During the initial tour of the kitchen on 5/11/26 at 10:09 AM the following observations were made:a. A dried on black/brown substance 1.5 - 2 inches from the front of the stove running approximately 2.5-3-foot down the length of the stove. A dried on black/brown substance approximately 8-10 inches high in three areas and to the top of the stove backsplash in one area; all areas ran the entire length of the stove black splash. b. The walk-in cooler had 1-1.5 inches of a black substance running where the door seal connects to the cooler door around the entire cooler door frame and a build-up of a thick, black substance, along the cooler door threshold approximately four foot in length. c. A build-up of a black/brown/orange substance running approximately 4 feet down the front of the griddle.A revisit to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to determine if 1 of 1 resident (Resident #4) with an inhaler at their bedside could safely self-administer the medication. The facility reported a census of 89 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/16/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a result of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses in the MDS included stroke, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and asthma.Review of Physician Orders revealed an order for ProAir RespiClick Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 108 (90 Base) MCG/ACT (Albuterol Sulfate) inhaler to provide 2 puffs inhaled orally every 4 hours as needed for wheezing/SOB. Start Date: 3/2/26. Review of Resident #4's Care Plan, dated 5/2/25, revealed a Focus area to address Resident is at risk for ineffective breathing pattern r/t (related to) asthma. Interventions included, in part: Medications as ordered. Date Initiated:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure he Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments coded accurately to reflect resident use of an indwelling catheter and use of an antidepressant and hypnotic for 2 of 2 resident (Resident #32 and Resident #83) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 89 residents.Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #32's MDS assessment, dated 5/4/26, revealed an admission date of 4/29/26. The list of diagnoses included: neurogenic bladder (lose of control due to nerve damage); multiple sclerosis and depression. The MDS identified Resident #32 with no appliance (such as a catheter or ostomy). Review of a Hospitalist Progress Note, dated 4/27/27 revealed an Assessment/Plan section which included, in part: Neurogenic bladder MS on chronic foley catheter (name of an urinary catheter). Review of the electronic health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview the facility failed to provide complete shaving care for 2 out of 2 residents dependent residents (Resident#1 and Resident #67) reviewed for activities of daily living care. The facility reported a census of 89 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 dated 3/4/26, listed diagnoses of coronary artery disease and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The MDS Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15 indicated a severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also reflected Resident#1 required partial/moderate assistance for personal hygiene, including shaving.The Care Plan for Resident#1 dated 02/20/2024, directed assistance of 1 staff for grooming.During an observation on 05/11/2026 at 12:16 PM, Resident#1 facial hair appeared unkempt with several days' growth. During an observation on 05/13/2026 at 7:50 AM, Resident #1 sat in his wheelchair at the nurse's station. His facial hair appeared long on both sides of his face and longer on his chin. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete physician ordered treatments for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for wound care. The facility failed to reported a census of 89 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #4 with the skin problem of moisture associated skin damage (often referred to as MASD, skin damage caused by prolonged exposure to moisture such as for example urine, or perspiration), with the need for treatments such as non-surgical dressings and ointments/medications. Review of Resident #4 Care Plan dated 5/2/25, revealed a Focus area which addressed At Risk for alteration in skin integrity related to impaired mobility, incontinence and DM (diabetes).MASD to groin, buttocks, perineum and abd (abdomen) folds. Will frequently refuse treatments,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement pressure reducing interventions per the wound nurse practitioner's recommendations for 1 of 2 (Resident #11) reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility identified a census of 89 residents.The CMS RAI Manual defines the following pressure injury (PI) (a pressure ulcer/injury is a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear. The pressure ulcer/injury can present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful) stages:Stage 1: Non-blanchable Erythema: Intact skin with persistent red/blue/purple discoloration; color does not blanch.Stage 2: Partial Thickness Loss: Shallow, open wound with red-pink bed (no slough) or a serum-filled blister.Stage 3: Full Thickness Skin Loss: Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone/muscle is not exposed; slough (moist, stringy, dead tissue) may be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, manufacturer guidelines and staff interviews, the facility failed to use the correct size full-body mechanical lift sling based on resident weight during a transfer for 1 of 3 (Resident #67) reviewed for accidents. The facility reported a census of 89 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #67's Minimum Data Set (MSD) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a list of diagnoses which included stroke, dementia, and aphasia (inability or impaired ability to understand or produce speech) The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15 indicated a severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessed Resident #67 dependent for chair to bed transfer. The MDS listed the resident's weight as 183 pounds.Review of Resident #67's Care Plan dated 2/21/24, revealed a Focus area to address Resident requires assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living). Interventions included, in part: Transferring: assist 2;1 with hoyer (hoyer is a brand name of a mechanical lift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$51,292 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $37,665 — penalty dated 2024-06-13
• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-03-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $514K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA