No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avantara Redfield

1015 Third Street East, Redfield, SD 57469 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 58 certified beds · (605) 472-2288 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (605) 472-2288 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$23,044 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $23,044 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-17)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
111 W 10th Ave · (605) 472-1110 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1010 W 1st St · (605) 472-1810 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
516 N Main St · (605) 472-0424 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(208) 795-8911 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.2%21.3%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%5.6%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.9%5.7%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.3%5.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.0%19.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.7%17.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%4.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.6%25.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.7%24.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.8%2.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%78.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.9%19.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.0%12.0%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.881.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.751.751.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

34.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF34.8%CMS range 22.5–48.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.4–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.9–14.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.63
RN hours/ resident / day
0.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
52.1%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 50.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-28)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2025-03-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI) record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the safety for one of one sampled resident (1) who was served a food item she had a documented food allergy to. The failure of serving the resident a food item that was identified as a food allergy resulted in the resident's allergic reaction symptoms and need for evaluation and treatment at the emergency department. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on a review of the corrective actions the provider implemented following the incident. Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 3/10/25 SD DOH FRI regarding resident 1 revealed: *On 3/8/25 at 5:22 p.m. she was served cake that contained strawberries for dessert. *Licensed practical nurse (LPN) C recognized the issue and immediately did an assessment and contacted the physician. *An order for 50 milligrams (mg) of Benadryl (an antihistamine to treat allergy symptoms) was received and administered. *Staff were to monitor for signs and symptoms of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, policy review, and interview the provider failed to ensure the safety for one of one sampled resident (1) who staff let out of the building in the early morning hours. Resident left the grounds and his wheelchair got stuck on the railroad tracks, and was unable to get himself free. The county sheriff found him and called the provider to let them know that he was gone. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on a review of the provider's corrective actions immediately following the incident. Findings include: 1.Review of provider's 8/23/24 SD DOH FRI for resident 1 revealed: *His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 9 (meaning moderate cognitive impairment). *On 8/23/24 at 3:37 a.m. the resident was assisted out the front door by registered nurse (RN) H. *RN H had not told other staff that he was outside. *RN H got busy and forgot the resident was outside. *RN H received a call from the county sheriff at 5:11 a.m. asking if resident 1 was a resident of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, observation, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure the safety for one of one sampled resident (2) identified at risk for elopement, had eloped (left the facility without staff knowledge) and was outside the building approximately 2 hours and 4 minutes when an activity door was left unalarmed. Failure of staff to ensure the door alarm was rearmed resulted in the resident's elopement and put him at risk for physical injury or serious harm. Specifically, the provider failed to monitor/revise interventions after elopement to ensure resident safety. Findings include: 1. Review of the SD DOH FRI revealed: *On 7/23/24 at 4:41 a.m. resident 2 walked out of facility and the doors alarmed. *Staff assisted resident back inside and put him to bed. *At 4:44 a.m. registered nurse (RN) C deactivated the door alarm and never reactivated it. *Resident C left facility again at 4:59 a.m. *Licensed practical nurse (LPN) E saw resident sitting on the lawn at 6:55 a.m. and staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, resident council meeting, resident council meeting minutes review, grievance forms review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that grievances regarding the food quality of residents' meals were addressed, and documentation reflecting the staff's efforts to resolve those grievances was communicated to the residents and approved as effective resolutions for:*Nine of nine residents (13, 18, 19, 22, 24, 36, 40, 50, and 51) who individually reported concerns in grievance records reviewed from July 2025 through January 2026.*Five of five residents (12, 19, 25, 32, and 44) who attended the resident council meeting on 1/26/26. Findings include:1. Interview on 1/25/26 at 12:19 p.m. with resident 4 revealed: *He preferred to eat meals in his room. *When his meal trays were delivered to his room, the food was not always as hot as he thought it should be. 2. Interview on 1/26/26 at 8:45 a.m. with resident 41 revealed: *He preferred to eat meals in his room. *When his meal trays were delivered to his room, the food was not always as hot as he thought it should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to provide care for four of five newly admitted residents (8, 18, 32, and 33) and failed to ensure the resident's baseline care plan was reviewed with the resident or resident representative within 48 hours of admission for three of five newly admitted residents (18, 32, and 33). Findings include:1. Review of resident 32's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Resident 32's representative and licensed practical nurse (LPN) G signed her baseline care plan on 8/13/25, nine days after she was admitted to the facility. *Resident 32's 8/4/25 baseline care plan did not indicate the level of assistance he required from staff to complete bathing tasks or what diet he should receive at meal times. -Resident requires assistance with ADL's [activities of daily living]: bed mobility, transfers, dressing, personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure staff members followed quality of care practices and professional standards that ensured:*A Roho cushion's (air filled cushion designed for high-level pressure ulcer prevention and treatment) were used and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions for one of one sampled resident (5) with a pressure ulcer (skin and/or underlying tissue injury from prolonged pressure) to her buttocks and upper thighs.*Specialized compression garments had complete physician's orders for use and were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions for one of one sampled resident (5) with lymphedema (tissue swelling caused by blocked lymph node fluid drainage) who used Circaids (adjustable compression garments designed to treat lymphedema, venous insufficiency, and edema).*A urine sample was collected according to the facility's identified professional standard reference by registered nurse (RN) E for one of one sampled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the provider failed to monitor and document the temperatures for one of one commercial dishwashing machine according to the provider's policy to ensure it reached the minimum rinse cycle temperature of 180 degrees for sanitization of dishes and equipment used to prepare and serve residents' meals after every meal service.Findings include:1.Observation and interview on 1/25/26 at 11:41 a.m. in the main kitchen with dietary aide R revealed:*A clipboard hanging on the wall at the end of the dish machine tray line with dishwasher temperatures on it.*The January 2026 dishwashing machine temperature log did not have temperatures documented for:-Breakfast on 1/12/26, 1/14/26, 1/21/26, and 1/24/26.-Lunch on 1/12/26, 1/14/26, 1/21/26, and 1/24/26.-Dinner on 1/10/26, 1/12/26, 1/13/26, 1/14/26, 1/15/26, and 1/20/26.*The manufacturer's sign attached to the dish machine stated:-NSF Machine Operation Requirements as Manufactured by CMA Dish machines.Wash Temperature-Minimum 155 degrees F cycle.Wash cycle Time 49 seconds.Rinse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the staff followed standard infection control practices regarding:*Hand hygiene (handwashing or hand sanitizer use) and gloves used by one of one certified medication aide (CMA) (H), and one of one licensed practical nurse (LPN) (G) while providing personal cares for resident 5.*Hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) (such as a gown, gloves, and mask) by one of one certified nursing assistant (CNA) (S) observed while delivering meal trays to four of four sampled residents (10, 14, 20, and 22) with COVID-19 (a contagious disease that can spread quickly) and on enhanced droplet precautions (which need and a N95 mask (a mask that filters 95 percent of airborne particles), gown, gloves, and eye protection to be worn when entering those rooms) according to the provider's policy. Findings include:1. Observation on 1/25/26 at 11:58 a.m. of CNA S passing lunch trays to residents in their rooms revealed:*On the door of resident 10's room was a sign for enhanced droplet precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure two of two sampled resident's (25 and 43) Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used to evaluate a resident's health status and to develop an individualized care plan to manage the resident's care needs) assessment was accurately coded for the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). Findings include: 1. Review of resident 25's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Her diagnoses included major depressive disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder (reoccurring thoughts and repetitive behaviors), anxiety disorder (anticipation of future danger or misfortune with symptoms such as restlessness or irritability), and paranoid schizophrenia (a chronic mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, causing a distorted sense of reality). *Her 5/9/23 level II [2] PASRR which stated, This PASRR approval is not time limit [does not have a time limit] there is no need to re-submit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to follow food safety standard pratices to ensure resident food temperatures were monitored and recorded according to the provider's policy for all meals prepared and served in one of one kitchen. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 4/14/25 at 4:45 p.m. with cook C in the kitchen revealed: *He was checking the temperature of the food for the evening meal. *He took the temperature of each food item five to fifteen minutes before it was served. *Staff were to document food temperatures on the food temperature chart for all meals. 2. Interview and record review on 4/15/25 at 9:50 a.m. with dietary manager B regarding food temperatures revealed: *Staff were instructed to take food temperatures for all meals. *The food temperatures were to be documented in the food temperature chart. *He stated it had been a struggle to get some staff to document the food temperatures. *He had implemented a new food temperature system on 4/1/25 to try to improve charting by the dietary staff. *In March…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the provider failed to ensure food items were appropriately labeled, stored, handled, prepared, and served to residents in a safe and sanitary manner in one of one kitchen and one of one dining rooms for the following: *One of one kitchen was not maintained in a safe and sanitary manner. *One of one commercial refrigerator contained beverage items that were not labeled, dated, or discarded by the use-by date. *Unsafe meat thawing practices. *Inappropriate glove use and hand hygiene by four of four observed dietary staff (dietary manager C, cook D, cook E, and dietary aide (DA) I) while preparing and serving residents' food. *Inappropriate glove use and hand hygiene by four of four observed staff (certified nursing assistant (CNA) K, CNA L, CNA N, and restorative aide (RA) J) while assisting residents in the dining room. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/3/24 at 7:47 a.m. of CNA K and CNA N in the main dining room revealed: *CNA K and CNA N were seated at a table with four residents who had not yet been identified. *CNA K and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for 5 of 49 sampled residents (6, 7, 13, 16, and 19) and for the residents who ate their meals in the main dining room. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/3/24 at 9:00 a.m. in the bathroom shared by residents 16 and 19 revealed: *The floor at the base of the toilet was wet. -There were areas of an unidentified black substance. -The caulking at the base of the toilet was peeling and missing in several areas. 2. Observation on 12/3/24 at 9:29 a.m. in resident 17's room revealed: *The faucet on the sink in that room had a white and green, thick, unidentified build-up, and areas of the faucet were missing. -This was not a cleanable surface. -The handle spun around in a circle and the surveyor was unable to get hot water at that sink. 3. Observation on 12/3/24 at 9:25 a.m. revealed a wall-mounted hand sanitizer outside of residents 16 and 19's room that did not dispense hand sanitizer and flopped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that essential dietary department kitchen equipment was in safe working condition including: *Five of the eight stove-top burners on the commercial gas stove that did not ignite. *Two of the two ovens in the commercial gas stove that were not in working condition. *One of one flattop grill that leaked oil down the side of the equipment and onto the floor beneath. *The two-compartment food preparation sink leaked and was not used to prepare food. *The air conditioning unit in the kitchen ceiling had condensation tubing attached to the faucet and drained into the handwashing sink. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/3/24 at 7:50 a.m. during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed: *The floor under the commercial gas stove and flattop grill had a thick brown oily substance on the left side that extended behind the stove. A large can containing grease was on the floor to the left of the stove and appeared to be catching grease as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *The foam filter was replaced on one of one sampled resident's (34) oxygen concentrator machine. *One of one sampled resident (34) had current physician's orders to receive oxygen therapy. *Facility policy had been followed regarding documenting oxygen tubing and foam filter replacement in one of one sampled resident's (34) electronic medical record (EMR). Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 12/3/24 at 3:11 p.m. with resident 34 in her room revealed: *She was receiving oxygen through a nasal cannula (flexible tubing with prongs to deliver oxygen through the nose). *There was no foam filter on the back of the oxygen concentrator machine. *She said the staff gave her new oxygen tubing that morning. *The oxygen concentrator machine was delivering oxygen at a rate of 3L (liters per minute). 2. Review of resident 34's EMR revealed: *There was no current physician's order for supplemental oxygen. *Three of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure wound care treatments were completed per physician orders and documented for one of one resident (2). Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 7/16/24 at 1:58 p.m. with resident 2 and licensed practical nurse (LPN) D revealed: *He was seated in his recliner with the footrest in the up position. *There was a wound dressing on his left foot. *LPN D removed the wound dressing and stated it was a vascular wound. *Resident 2 stated he had a scheduled appointment the next day with a vascular surgeon for possible amputation of his left foot. *Resident 2 stated that a nurse who worked the night shift had not completed his dressings a couple of times. Review of resident 2's medical record revealed: *He was admitted on [DATE]. *His diagnoses included: peripheral vascular disease, vitamin D deficiency (Vitamin D deficiency can lead to delayed or chronic wounds), major depressive disorder, low back pain, varicose veins…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and a cleaning checklist for housekeepers the provided failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment that included the following: *A handwashing sink in the dining room that had noticeable water damage and one of the doors were hanging off the hinge. *A cracked half-wall located in the resident's shower room. *A resident's door opening only halfway and leaving grooves in the floor. *Paint on a heating unit in a resident's room is peeling away. *A wall heating unit in the dining room was that pulling away from the wall. *Spider webs around a non-exit door. *Multiple non-used screws in the wall. *Wallpaper in multiple places throughout the facility was bubbling and peeling away from the wall. 1. Observation on 8/29/23 8:32 a.m. in the main dining room revealed: *A handwashing sink was located next to the entrance to the kitchen. -It had noticeable water damage located at the bottom front and side. -The right-side door had fallen off the hinge and was hanging down. Observation on 8/29/23 at 9:00 a.m. in the resident's shower room revealed: *A wheeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, email communication review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *A functional whirlpool tub was available to all residents who preferred a tub bath. *Scheduled showers were offered and given to 16 of 40 sampled residents (3, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 23, 24, 25, 30, 32, 33, 38, and 40). Findings include: 1. Observation on 8/29/23 at 9:35 a.m. of the resident's shower room revealed: *A wheeled high-back chair was sitting against a wall and a handheld shower-head with a long hose was connected to the wall. -Bottles of shampoo, conditioner, and body wash were on top of the half-wall located next to the chair. *A whirlpool tub was in the corner covered with plastic. *There were no other whirlpool tub visible in the shower room. 2. Interview on 8/29/23 at 2:32 p.m. with maintenance director C regarding the non-functional whirlpool tub revealed: *They had a whirlpool tub, but it leaked, had draining and electrical issues. -He was not aware the last time it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$23,044 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $7,008 — penalty dated 2025-03-17
  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-08-28
  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 88 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avantara ArrowheadRapid City, SD 1 of 5Avantara Evergreen ParkEvergreen Park, IL 1 of 5Avantara MilbankMilbank, SD 1 of 5Avantara Saint CloudRapid City, SD 1 of 5Avantara WatertownWatertown, SD 1 of 5Emmetsburg Care CenterEmmetsburg, IA 1 of 5Grove Of Elmhurst, TheElmhurst, IL 1 of 5Harmony Cedar RapidsCedar Rapids, IA 1 of 5Harmony House Health Care CenterWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Harmony MarshalltownMarshalltown, IA 1 of 5Harmony WaterlooWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Harmony West Des MoinesWest Des Moines, IA 1 of 5Nexus at BerwynBerwyn, IL 1 of 5Northgate Care CenterWaukon, IA 1 of 5Park View Rehabilitation CenterSac City, IA 1 of 5Southfield Wellness CommunityWebster City, IA 1 of 5Warren Barr South LoopChicago, IL 2 of 5Avantara GrotonGroton, SD 2 of 5Avantara HuronHuron, SD 2 of 5Avantara Lincoln ParkChicago, IL 2 of 5Avantara Mountain ViewRapid City, SD 2 of 5Avantara Palos HeightsPalos Heights, IL 2 of 5Avantara PierrePierre, SD 2 of 5Bella Terra BloomingdaleBloomingdale, IL 2 of 5Bella Terra Morton GroveMorton Grove, IL 2 of 5Carlton At The Lake, TheChicago, IL 2 of 5Chalet Living & RehabChicago, IL 2 of 5Colonial Manor of ElmaElma, IA 2 of 5Hallmark Care CenterMount Vernon, IA 2 of 5Harmony DavenportDavenport, IA 2 of 5Harmony DubuqueDubuque, IA 2 of 5Harmony PalosPalos Heights, IL 2 of 5Harmony Utica RidgeDavenport, IA 2 of 5Heritage Care And Rehabilitation CenterMason City, IA 2 of 5Manor House Care CenterSigourney, IA 2 of 5Peterson Park Health Care CtrChicago, IL 3 of 5Avantara LibertyvilleLibertyville, IL 3 of 5Avantara NorthRapid City, SD 3 of 5Bloomfield Care CenterBloomfield, IA 3 of 5Clark ManorChicago, IL

Showing 40 of 88; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DOROS GENERATION TRUST U/A/D 1/3/12Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF43%since 07/01/2019
GPN FAMILY TRUST U/A/D 4/28/08Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF43%since 07/01/2019
OAKWAY OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 07/01/2019
BOKF,NAOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/04/2024
REDFIELD SD PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2019
RAJCHENBACH, CHAIMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2019
SHABAT, MENACHEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2019
FORGEY, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2019
WALDNER, RANDALLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LEGACY HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2001
ROTH & CO, LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$330K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 12%Other / private 18%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $330K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$252per resident / day
operating cost
$7,658per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$250per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the South Dakota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in South Dakota
$9,444/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,190/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,900/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 435054. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next