Harmony Palos
11860 Southwest Highway, Palos Heights, IL 60463 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (708) 361-4555 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,874 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-11)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 97.2% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.9% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.9% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 34.1% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.1% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.0% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.2% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.0% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.10 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.55 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 304 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.1%CMS range 49.9–60.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 9.4–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.5–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 98.8 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents was free from accident hazards and received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent an avoidable fall. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an agency CNA (V3) was oriented to R1's high fall risk status. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a displaced humerus fracture, head laceration with active bleeding requiring sterile-strips, and facial contusions. R1 is an alert and oriented predominantly Polish-speaking [AGE] year old with diagnoses listed in part but not limited to type II Diabetes, Fracture of the Upper End of Right Humerus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, Anxiety Disorder and History of Falls. A facility incident report dated 9/12/2025 reads in part, On 9/12/25 while CNA (V3) was providing ADL (activities of daily living) care to the resident when the fall occurred the CNA had (R1) laying on her left side,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that staff turn/reposition residents safely, failed to ensure that staff report resident falls, failed to ensure that staff are aware of resident fall prevention interventions, failed to implement fall prevention interventions, failed to provide supervision, and/or failed to ensure that equipment was functioning properly for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for falls. These failures resulted in R1's (5/9/25) fall with sustained right acute intertrochanteric femoral neck fracture and pain rated 5/10. Findings include: R1 is [AGE] years old with diagnoses which include congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, lymphedema, and hypertension. R1's (3/1/25) fall risk assessment determined a score of 15 (high risk). R1's (5/28/25) functional assessment affirms resident is dependent on staff for rolling left and right. R1's (5/9/25) progress note (entered by V11/Agency Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement effective fall interventions and supervision for a dependent resident assessed as a high risk for falls. This failure affected one resident (R2) of four residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in (R2) having a fall, being sent out to the emergency room, and sustaining a laceration to right eyebrow requiring 3 sutures. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: Functional quadriplegia, atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C0500 dated 2/18/2025 documents Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score = 15 which suggests cognition is intact. MDS section GG0130 dated 2/18/2025 documents resident is dependent on staff for the following areas: eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for care planning and fall prevention by not implementing previously established fall interventions based on all available information for a resident readmitted to the facility with a history of repeated falls and by not implementing personalized fall interventions or ensuring all available sources of information were utilized to identify and implement effective fall interventions for a resident who was admitted to the facility after being hospitalized from a fall that resulted in multiple significant injuries. This failure applies to two of four residents (R7 and R56) reviewed for falls and resulted in R56 experiencing a fall that resulted in a thigh bone fracture. Findings include: R7 is an [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Metabolic Encephalopathy, Right and Left Side Pain from Back to Legs, and restless leg syndrome who was admitted to the facility 07/23/2024. R7's admission hospital records dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff follow professional standards of practice when administering medication by failing to administer medication before documenting, failed to correctly document refused medication and failed to notify attending physician that a resident was refusing a particular medication. This failure affected one (R3) of five residents reviewed for nursing services.Findings include:R3 is [AGE] years old admitted to the facility on [DATE], face sheet listed the following past medical history: Polyneuropathy unspecified, other specified disorders of muscle, type 2 diabetes with foot ulcer and other circulatory complications, cutaneous abscess of buttock, major depressive disorder, presence of cardiac pacemaker, venous insufficiency, hypertensive heart disease, etc. Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], section C (cognitive) documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 for R3 indicating that resident is cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from abuse. This deficient practice affects one resident (R6) of three residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R6 having right leg shin bruising/hematoma.Findings Include:Facility Reported Incident to State Agency dated 3/22/26, reads in part: On 3/22/26 @ 8pm, R6 reported that V15 (CNA) kicked her in her leg and pulled her hair. V15 was removed from the building immediately. Notified attending physician, and emergency contact. Police Department was called and is in route.R6 is an [AGE] year-old female resident with diagnoses of Metabolic Encephalopathy, and Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety.On 5/6/26 at 9:30AM, observed R6 in bed watching television. R6 is alert and oriented and reported that on the day of the reported abuse, R6 entered the elevator, one person standing by the elevator control panel. The staff member flung her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement fall care plan interventions for fall-risk residents. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R4 and R8) who were reviewed for falls and injuries in a sample of 10.The Findings include:1.R4 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with mild cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R4 was admitted with an admitting diagnosis including bipolar and a neoplasm of the tongue.On 5/5/26 at 10:05 AM, R4 was observed on his bed with no floor mat on his right side, and a folded floor mat was observed on his left side leaning against the bedside drawer.On 5/5/26 at 10:10 AM, V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant) entered R4's room and stated, I was about to give R4 a shower as today is his shower day. I will put the floor padding back after his shower.A review of the fall care plan documented interventions, including a floor mat on the right side of R4's bed.A review of the incident note dated 2/2/26 documented an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the fall care plan interventions in place for at-risk fall residents. This applies to 3 of 3 residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 6.The findings include:1.R3 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with moderate cognitive impairment as per the MDS dated [DATE].On 3/31/26 AT 10:15 AM, R3 was on her bed with V9 (R3's Daughter) at her bedside. V9 stated, Nobody knows how R3 had a hip fracture. My mom doesn't walk, and we don't know how the injury happened. They didn't always have the bed alarm activated.On 4/1/26 at 9:15 AM, R3 was on her bed, and R3's bed alarm was not working. Upon notification, V10 (Restorative Nurse) checked the bed alarm and stated, We have to change the battery.On 4/1/26 at 9:50 AM, observed that R3's bed alarm was not working, with a new battery installed and not blinking. On 4/1/26 at 9:50 AM, V11 (R3's Nurse) checked the bed alarm and stated, The bed alarm is not working/blinking. I am going…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to acquire and administer prescription medications to residents. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services in a sample of 6The findings include:R1 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE], having mild cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R1 was admitted with an admitting diagnosis including left femur fracture, Parkinson's disease, and bone density disorder.A review of the Physician Order Sheet (POS) documented that R1 was ordered with his hallucination medication Nuplazid 34 milligrams once a day, starting on 3/2/26.A review of R1's Medical Administration Record (MAR) for 03/2026 documents that R1 didn't receive his hallucination medication (Nuplazid) on 3/2/26, 3/3/26, and 3/4/26.A review of the POS indicates that the hallucination medication was discontinued on 3/4/26.On 4/1/26, the facility presented a statement from V4 (Registered Nurse for R1 on 3/4/26) stating that it was a clerical error…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to order and initiate contact isolation precautions for a resident (R4) while the resident was being treated for scabies for one out of three reviewed for infection control in a total sample of eight. Findings Include: R4 is a [AGE] year-old with the following diagnosis: dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and lung cancer. R4 was unable to answer questions due to mental status. On 3/7/26 at 1:24PM, V3 (CNA/Certified Nurses Assistant) stated R4 had a rash on the arms, chest, and back about a couple months ago. V3 reported residents that are being treated for scabies are put on isolation immediately, so they don't spread it to other residents or staff. V3 stated V3 was not aware R4 had been treated for scabies. V3 denied ever seeing R4 on isolation. V3 reported it is the nurse's responsibility to put in the orders for isolation and inform other staff. On 3/7/26 at 2:23PM, V4 (Former Wound Care Coordinator) stated the nurses will contact the physician for further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the established comprehensive care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R1) to ensure safety during bed mobility and ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care and failed to communicate the resident's fall risk status. Specifically, facility staff failed to provide the required level of assistance and supervision mandated by the care plan, which led to a fall resulting in significant injury of a Humerus Fracture. A facility incident report dated 9/12/2025 reads in part, On 9/12/25 while CNA (V3) was providing ADL (activities of daily living) care to the resident when the fall occurred the CNA had (R1) laying on her left side, the CNA had one hand on her rib cage area to stabilize the resident while she was washing her with the other hand when the resident started to roll out of the bed the CNA attempted to stop the fall but was unsuccessful. The CNA notified the nurse on duty. The nurse on immediately assessed the resident. (R1) complained of pain to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-04 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents (R1) received care from staff with documented competency and training. Specifically, the facility assigned an agency CNA to provide direct care for R1 without first validating that the staff member possessed the necessary clinical skills or had been oriented to R1's specific safety needs, including fall risk status and required levels of assistance. As a result, the facility failed to ensure that R1 was provided care by a staff member with verified qualifications to perform the assigned duties. R1 is an alert and oriented predominantly Polish-speaking [AGE] year old with diagnoses listed in part but not limited to type II Diabetes, Fracture of the upper end of Right Humerus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, Anxiety Disorder and History of Falls. A facility incident report dated 9/12/2025 reads in part, On 9/12/25 while CNA (V3) was providing ADL (activities of daily living) care to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Incident Reporting Policy. Facility failed to timely report (within 24 hours) a major injury from a known incident to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health). This deficient practice affects one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for incident/accident. Findings Include: R1 is a [AGE] year old female resident, with diagnosis of but not limited to: Congestive Heart Failure, Pressure Ulcer Sacral Stage 3, Chronic Kidney Disease, Seizures, Lymphedema, and Pulmonary Hypertension. R1 has a BIMS of 8 (Moderate Cognitive Impairment). Facility Provided Initial Report to IDPH of this major injury on 5/13/25, reads in part: CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) towards the end of providing peri-care to R1 in bed, on the last time that CNA turned R1 towards her, CNA inadvertently overturned resident's right leg. In the CNA's attempt to prevent R1 from rolling out of bed, CNA turned R1's leg back to bed preventing a fall. After peri care. R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R1's (5/9/25) final facility incident report states on (5/9/25) CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was providing peri-care to resident in bed, on the last time that CNA turned the resident towards her, CNA inadvertently overturned resident's right leg which resulted in the resident falling out of the bed and on to the floor. Residents care plan was updated to include assistive device in bed to assist resident with turning and repositioning. R1's (3/1/25) risk for falls care plan excludes the (5/9/25) fall and an assistive device in bed. On 6/10/25 at 11:48am, surveyor inquired if R1's comprehensive care plan includes an assistive device for turning and/or repositioning in bed (as stated on the 5/9/25 incident report) V3 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) accessed R1's electronic medical record and responded No, she does not have side rails. __ R2's (5/21/25) incident report includes a fall. R2's (3/20/25) risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for preparing food under sanitary conditions by not using hand hygiene, when necessary, not sanitizing surfaces after cleaning them, not ensuring appliances were adequately dried or free of surface contamination after cleaning and before use, and not ensuring hair restraints were worn properly. This failure applies to all 96 residents in the facility. Findings include: Kitchen On 11/19/24 from 10:30 AM - 11:30 AM Observed while taking temperature of seasoned rice observed V28 (Cook) doff and don gloves without performing hand hygiene then prepare pureed taco meat, observed V27 (Food Service Director) and doff and don gloves while performing tasks in the food prep area without performing hand hygiene. Observed V29 (Night Cook) doff and don gloves while performing hand hygiene while performing tasks in the food prep area then handle clean dishware. Observed V28 doff and don gloves multiple times without performing hand hygiene while preparing and temping food, handling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for comprehensive care planning by not ensuring care plans, and personalized care planning interventions were implemented as needed based on grievances, resident's past medical history, and comprehensive assessments. This failure applies to four of four residents (R7, R16, R45, and R56) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R7 is an [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Metabolic Encephalopathy, Right and Left Side Pain from Back to Legs, and restless leg syndrome who was admitted to the facility 07/23/2024. R7's admission hospital records dated 02/21/2024 documents he had a history of frequent falls, he was admitted to the hospital after a fall at home, he had previous hospital admissions related to falls in the last few years, he has severe lumbar spine fusion and complains of pain, per family member he has been having more frequent falls as of late, and can be transferred to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure multidose vials of insulin were dated when vials were first accessed for two residents (R14 and R5) and failed to safely dispose of seven expired bottles of house stock medications. This failure has the potential to affect 38 residents residing on the second floor. Findings include: On 11/19/24, at 10:53 AM, Surveyor asked V8 Registered Nurse (RN) to review second floor low-end medication cart. Surveyor observed a previously accessed insulin pen of Toujeo Solostar (insulin) 300 unit/ml injection that showed an order date of 10/30/2024. Insulin pen was not dated when it was opened or dated for when to discard on the pen or the bag it was in. This insulin pen had an expiration date of 8/31/2026 and was for R5. V8 (RN) verified the pen had previously been accessed and that it did not have a date on the insulin pen of when it was accessed or when it should be discarded. Surveyor observed the following: 5 house stock medications bottles expired in the same medication cart: Oyster shell Calcium 500 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the use of personal protective equipment during provision of care on residents in isolation rooms; failed to change soiled gloves during ADL (activities of daily living) care; and failed to prevent contamination of urinary catheter and bag by keeping it off the floor for four (R15, R71, R101 and R112) of four residents in the sample of 46 reviewed for infection control. Findings include: R15 is an [AGE] year-old, male admitted in the facility on 10/22/24 with diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety; and Chronic Viral Hepatitis C. On 11/18/24 at 11:39 AM, V16 (Certified Nurse Assistant, CNA) was observed providing ADL care on R15. V16 was observed wearing the same pair of gloves when she started wiping R15's face, neck, upper back, lower back and when cleaning the genital area. She (V16) was also wearing the same pair of gloves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to assess and evaluate a resident for self-administration of inhalers and eyedrops; and failed to obtain physician's order for eyedrops for one (R10) of one resident in the sample of 46 reviewed for medications. Findings include: R10 is an [AGE] year-old, male, admitted in the facility on 08/16/24 with diagnoses of Other Pulmonary Embolism Without Acute Cor Pulmonale; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Unspecified; Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia; and Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 08/19/24 Section C recorded R10 has BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12 which means moderate impairment in cognition. On 11/18/24 at 10:09 AM, R10 was observed in room, in bed, watching television. A Combivent inhaler was observed placed on bedside table. R10 was asked if he is self-administering the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policies for restorative nursing program services by not ensuring a resident received the necessary treatment and services to prevent further decline in physical functioning for a resident with a contracture. This failure applies to one of one resident (R45) reviewed for rehab and therapy services. Findings include: Resident #45 R45 is a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Partial Paralysis following a Stroke, Dementia, and History of Falling who was admitted to the facility 09/16/2024. On 11/18/24 at 11:00 AM Observed R45's left hand contracted. R45 stated, he cannot use his left hand. V33 (Family Member) stated, she was told the facility won't provide therapy services for R45 hand because his insurance won't cover it. V33 stated, R45 has multiple medical insurances, and she isn't sure why some form of therapy services isn't covered for him. R45's admission Restorative assessment dated [DATE] documents he is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to ensure medical records for one resident are complete and accurately documented by containing accurate and complete restorative assessments and interventions to address care plan needs. This affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for medical records. The findings include: R1's diagnosis include, but are not limited to Vertebra Fracture, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Unspecified Symptoms and Signs Involving the Nervous System, History of Falling, Dementia, Depression, Anxiety, and Osteoarthritis. Incident report provided to IDPH states on [DATE] R1 complained of pain to the right shoulder. X-rays were obtained with findings of acute appearing clavicle fracture. R1 was sent for evaluation to the hospital on [DATE] and returned the same day to the facility. R1 was a hospice patient and died on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:48PM V2, Restorative CNA, said R1 was on a turning and repositioning program. V2 said R1 can turn but needed 2 person assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were in place and failed to ensure dressing changes were completed for a resident with pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 residents (R3, R4) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 12. The findings include: 1. R4's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include metabolic encephalopathy, disorders of muscle, urinary tract infection, resistance to multiple antibiotics, hypertension, cerebral infarction, and pressure-induced deep tissue damage of sacral region, right ankle, right heel, and left heel. R4's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R4 is cognitively impaired and requires substantial to maximum assistance from staff for most cares. R4's care plan initiated 3/1/24 showed, [R4] has pressure injuries to R (right) heel, L (left) heel, sacral, and R lateral ankle related to impaired mobility . Apply wound treatment as ordered by the physician . On 3/9/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure enhanced foods were provided as ordered and weights were obtained as ordered for a resident with weight loss for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 12. The findings include: 1.R2's computerized profile printed on 3/9/24 shows diagnosis to include aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, and atrial fibrillation. R2's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R2 was dependent on staff for hygiene, toileting, bathing, and dressing. This assessment showed R2 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent on staff for bed mobility. This assessment showed R2's weight was 267 pounds, and R2 had no identified weight loss. On 3/9/24 at 9:42AM, R2 was resting in bed with the head of her bed elevated. R2 had a water pitcher with straw on the right side of her bedside table. There were no other food or drink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a manner to prevent cross-contamination for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 12. The findings include: R2's computerized profile printed on 3/9/24 shows diagnosis to include aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, and atrial fibrillation. R2's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R2 was dependent on staff for hygiene, toileting, bathing, and dressing. This assessment showed R2 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent on staff for bed mobility. On 3/9/24 at 1:23PM, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) removed R2's blankets and unfastened R2's incontinence brief. V6 rolled R2 over on her left side. R2 was incontinent of urine and stool. V6 tucked the soiled incontinence brief under R2 and used wipes to clean R2 of stool. V6 then applied petroleum jelly to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights where within reach for four (R58, R62, R290, and R293) of six residents in a sample of 25 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: 1. On 9/5/2023 at 7:30 AM, R58 and R62 were observed in bed with R58's call light hanging off the side of the bed and R62's call light behind her mattress, out of reach for the residents. On 9/5/2023 at 7:35 AM, V14 (Nursing Assistant) said all call lights should be attached to the resident's chest. On 9/5/2023 at 1:50PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said all call lights should be within reach of every resident. Physician order sheet dated 8/24/2020 indicates that R58 has a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis' following cerebra infraction affecting left non-dominant side and functional quadriplegia. Care-plan update 8/28/20 indicates R58 At risk for falls due to impaired balance/poor coordination, potential medication side effects, unsteady gait, recent fall. Place call light within easy reach; clip call button to pt.'s gown. Physician order sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were receiving routine range of motion exercises to maintain or prevent further loss of range of motion. This failure affected 5 residents (R18, R22, R56, R13, and R76) of 5 reviewed for range of motion in a total sample of 25. Findings include: 1. On 9-05-23 at 9:45 AM R56 said she is not receiving therapy services and said she is doing exercises for her right arm by herself without assistance from restorative nurse or CNA. On 9-05-23 at 9:25 AM R18 said she is no longer receiving therapy (due to insurance) and the staff is not helping her with exercises. On 9-05-23 at 8:39 AM, R22 said he has not received restorative therapy and is not currently receiving therapy services. On 9-06-23 at 12:04 PM, V2 (DON) said the previous company did not have a restorative program in place. Range of motion was provided during ADLs (dressing and bathing) by CNAs. On 9-07-23 at 10:57 AM, V27 (Director of Therapy Services) said currently there is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect and value the resident's private space for three of five residents (R290, R292, R293) observed for resident's rights in a sample of 25. Findings include: On 09/05/2023 between 7:31AM to 7:40AM during observation, V6 (Registered Nurse) was observed entering R290's, R293's and R292's room without knocking or asking permission to go inside the residents' rooms. On 09/06/2023 at 7:40AM, V6 said that she should knock on the door and ask permission to enter first before going inside the residents' rooms. R290's order review report dated 9/6/2023 indicated admission date of 08/21/2023 and diagnoses including unspecified psychosis and unspecified dementia. R292's order review report dated 9/6/2023 indicated admission date 09/01/2023 and diagnoses including depression. R293's order review report dated 9/6/2023 indicated admission date 08/04/2023 and diagnoses including other specified depressive episodes. Facility Documents: Policy Title: Privacy and Dignity Revised: 7/28/23 Policy Statement: It is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident assessed as a high fall risk from having an unwitnessed fall from his bed. This failure affected 1 of 4 residents (R27) reviewed for falls. The facility failed to follow the Fall Policy by not conducting fall investigations or determining the root cause of fall incidents. This failure affected 3 of 4 (R18, R22, R27) residents reviewed for falls. The facility failed to follow fall care plan interventions by not using 2 staff members to provide care to resident in bed which resulted in resident falling out of bed and sustaining skin tears. This failure affected 1 resident (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for falls in a total sample of 25. Findings include: 1. On 9-7-23 at 1:20 PM, V1 (Administrator) said a fall investigation is to determine the cause of the fall and to help put interventions in place to prevent re-occurrences. V2 (DON) said there was no documentation of root cause analysis for R18, R22, and R27. On 9-6-23 at 11:11 AM, V7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide specialized care needs according to professional standards for residents on oxygen therapy for three of three residents (R293, R292, R61) reviewed for oxygen in a sample of 25. Findings include: On 09/05/2023 between 7:33AM to 7:40AM during observation with V6 (Registered Nurse), R293's and R292's room/door did not have any sign or indication that R293 and R292 were on oxygen. Upon entrance, R293 and R292 were observed connected to oxygen concentrator via undated nasal cannula. At 8:15AM during observation with V7 (Assistant Director of Nursing), R61's room/door did not have any sign or indication that R61 was on oxygen. Upon entering, R61 was observed connected to oxygen concentrator via undated nasal cannula. On 09/05/2023 at 7:40AM, V6 stated that there should be sign by the door indicating resident is on oxygen and the oxygen cannula should be dated each time it is being changed. On 09/05/2023 at 8:15AM, V7 said that a sign by the door should indicate the resident is on oxygen and the nasal cannula…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its infection control policy on hand hygiene for one of six residents (R61) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 25 residents. Findings include: On 9/5/22 at 1:00PM, during medication administration for R61, V6 (Registered Nurse) was observed picking up a garbage can per R61's request to bring it closer to R61. V6 then proceeded to spike an IV (intravenous) bag without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. On 9/6/23 at 135PM, V6 stated, I should have washed my hands to prevent cross contamination. On 9/6/23 at V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that hand hygiene should be performed after touching a dirty surface and before providing care to residents. On 9/7/23 at 1:30 PM, V11 (Infection Prevention) stated employees are expected to change gloves or perform hand hygiene after encountering a contaminated surface and before providing care to residents. A physician order sheet dated 8/8/2023 indicates R61 was admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the Abuse and Neglect Policy by not reporting a suspicious arm bruise for 1 of 3 residents (R27) reviewed for injury of unknown origin/abuse in a total sample of 25. Findings include: On 9-6-23 at 12:06 PM, V1 (Administrator) said she was not aware of concerns of unexplained bruising to R27's arms. V1 said she will report this concern to the state agency immediately. On 9-6-23 at 12:04 PM, V2 (DON) said he was not aware of concerns of unexplained bruising to R27's arms. V2 said after receiving a concern of injury of unknown origin, staff should report to abuse coordinator and they (abuse coordinator or designee) would report to state agency. On 9-6-23 at 11:11 AM, V7 (ADON) said family made concerns of unexplained bruises while R27 was at the hospital. V11 said she reported bruising to abuse coordinator (unsure of the date) and is not aware if abuse investigation started. R27's Progress Notes do not document concerns of unexplained bruising to R27's arms. State Reportable were reviewed and no concerns of unexplained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their call light policy and provide adequate and reasonable accommodation of resident needs to four residents (R8, R11, R12, R13) of 4 residents reviewed for call lights response. This inaction from facility workers resulted in extended wait times to residents attempting to have their needs met. Failure to respond to call lights in a timely manner has the potential to affect all residents on the unit. Findings include: On 08/14/2023 at 09:30 AM, V2 (Assistant Administrator) provided facility census that indicated current census of 83 residents in house. On 08/15/2023, reviewed grievance/concern logs and noted the following: Concern/Response Form unsigned and dated 05/09/2023 indicated R11, expressed concern with call light response time. Follow-up action taken was, in-serviced staff on call light response times. R11's face sheet indicates she was admitted to facility on 04/27/2023 and discharged from facility to home on [DATE]. Concern/Response…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to adequately discharge on e resident (R4) by not properly completing their facility discharge procedure and ensuring medications were reconciled with the resident. This failure, by the discharging nurse, caused R4 to be discharged from the facility to home with another resident's medication. This failure affected one of two residents (R4 and R14) reviewed for policy and procedures. Findings include: On 08/14/2023 at 09:30 AM, V2 (Assistant Administrator) provided facility census that indicated current census of 83 residents in house. On 08/14/2023 at 11:37 AM, R4 informed surveyor during phone interview that she was discharged home with R14's medication card for simvastatin 40mg (milligram) tablet that had 22 pills left on the card. R4 then said that she was sent home with her medications but did not indicate that the discharging nurse provided her with a list of medications or that her medications were reconciled with her upon discharge. Reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for two residents (R5, R13) assessed to be dependent on staff for grooming and personal hygiene by: 1. failing to ensure R13 received personal hygiene care and was free from having dried feces found on his body, bed linens and medical leg brace on numerous occasions and 2. failing to ensure R5 received showers as scheduled twice weekly and/or documented any refusals. This failure affected two of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. On 08/14/2023 at 09:30 AM, V2 (Assistant Administrator) provided facility census that indicated current census of 83 residents in house. On 08/15/2023, reviewed grievance/concern log and noted form dated 08/08/2023 with concern by V22 (Family Member) regarding R13 that indicated family arrived on a Saturday morning and found feces on the patient and bed and when family asked for help, they were told by the staff it's not my job. Form indicated, weekend staff are not helpful with patient care.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to keep the call lights in reach for four residents (R16, R24, R48, R75) of seven reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 21. Findings include: On 5/24/22 at 11:08am, R48 was sitting on the foot of his bed on the left side. R48 said, I don't know where my call light is. I need to be changed. I keep peeing on myself. R48's call light was on the floor on the right side of his bed. R75's, (roommate of R48) call light was on the bedside table out of reach of R75. On 5/24/22 at 11:16am R16 and R24 call lights were out of reach behind the bedside table. R16 was calling out, I have to pee, I have to pee! On 5/24/22 at 11:26am V8 (RN-Registered Nurse) said, they (call lights) should be of them (residents). At 11:28am V26 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) said, they (call lights) should be in reach. On 5/26/22 at 9:50am V2 (Director of Nursing) said, the call light should be on the person. A policy titled Call Light indicates, 6. Always position call light conveniently for use and within reach. A clip may be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 5/24/22 at 12:05 PM the cart for PPE (personal protective equipment) for R78, R79, and R131 do not contain any gloves. On 5/25/22 at 9:45 AM the cart for PPE for R131 does not contain any gloves. On 5/24/22 at 1:10 PM V14 (Central Supply Clerk) said, I stock the cart when I bring it up and the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) are responsible to replace items from the clean utility room. On 5/25/22 at 10:00 AM V15 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said, I have put some gowns in them (PPE carts). I guess everybody should replace stuff. They didn't give it to us as a specific CNA duty. On 5/25/22 at 12:21 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) said, residents who have not completed the Covid vaccine are placed on droplet and contact precautions for ten days. R78, R79, and R131 are on droplet and contact precautions. There is no policy for stocking PPE carts. The Central Supply Clerk should restock the PPE carts during the day shift when she is here. The CNAs should restock the PPE on other shifts. The census for R79…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy by failing to provide catheter dignity bags to two residents R15 and R27 reviewed for catheters in a sample of 21 residents. Finding include: On 5/24/22 at 11:30am during facility tour on the 2nd floor, R15 and R27's catheter bags were observed hanging without a dignity bag facing the doorway. This allowed for visitors to be able to see the catheter while walking past the residents' rooms. Interview on 5/24/22 at 12:05pm with V2 (Director of Nursing) revealed that the facility has dignity bags and all catheter bags should be inside a dignity bag. Interview on 5/24/22 at 1:00pm with V8 (Registered Nurse) revealed that catheter bags should be inside a catheter dignity privacy bag. Facility policy titled Catheter Care: Indwelling Catheter with revision date of 4/2019 includes: purpose; To provide hygiene for patient with indwelling catheters. Catheter bags should be covered with a catheter dignity bag to preserve the dignity of the patient . Procedure: 16. Check that tubing is not kinked,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly administer medications as per physician orders and in accordance with professional standards of clinical practice, for one of one resident (R17) in a sample of 21 reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 5/25/2022 at 10:25am R17 was observed asleep in bed with a cup of applesauce, a spoon and crushed powder placed on the bedside table. R17 said that's my medication the nurse leaves it there all the time. At 10:35am V11 (Registered Nurse-RN) said, that is R17's morning medication, R17 will not take his medication if you try and give it to him right away so I leave it and keep coming back encouraging R17 to take his medication. I think it's care planned that R17 will not take his medication, he is alert and oriented times three. At 10:55am V2 (Director of Nursing-RN) observed R17 medication at the bedside and said no medication should be left at the beside unless they have a physician order to self-medicate and its care planned. A Physician Order Sheet dated 5/25/2022 indicates a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide personal hygiene and grooming, including incontinence care to residents who need total care in a timely manner. This deficiency affects all three (R24, R57 and R60) residents in a sample of 21 reviewed for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) provided for dependent residents. Findings include: 1. R60 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include Dementia, Cerebrovascular Disease (CVA), Gastrostomy, and Failure to thrive. R60's care plan indicates he has an ADL self-care deficit. R60 needs assistance with daily hygiene, grooming, dressing, oral care and eating. R60 needs to be checked for incontinence frequently and staff assists in providing incontinence care as needed. R60 has bowel and urinary incontinence. On 5/24/22 at 12:15pm, V19 Family member approached the nursing station and complained to V4 LPN that R60 has not been cleaned since this morning and needs to be changed. V19 said that she does his morning care when she comes in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards and their care plan for residents' who have a Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter (PICC), severe contractures on upper and lower extremities and a venous stasis ulcer. This deficiency affects two (R24 and R57) of three residents reviewed for Quality of Care. Findings include: 1. R24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include Cerebral Palsy, Cerebral infarction, Myasthenia Gravis, Epilepsy, Scoliosis, Fusion of spine lumbar region, Gastrostomy. R24's care plan indicated she has ADL self-care deficit. She has alteration in musculoskeletal status due to impaired mobility and contractures. R24 does not have treatment order/care for severe contractures on both upper and lower extremities. No interventions formulated and implemented for the severe flexion contractures of bilateral hands/wrist and bilateral eversion/outward rotation of feet. R24's Therapy communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP) who had completed a specialized training course to be responsible for the facility's Infection prevention and Control Program necessary for the Covid-19 survey protocol. This failure has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: On 5/26/2022 at 1:30pm V1 (Administrator) said as of now we do not have an infection preventionist, that nurse will start on Monday with a certification. The director of nursing will be handling the infection control until the nurse arrives. On 5/27/2022 at 10:30am V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) said that he oversees the Infection Preventionist duties along with the respiratory therapist. On 5/27/2022 at 10:50am, job description for the Director of Nursing-DON dated 8/02, Revised 2/08, 01/16, 06/17 indicates: Leadership Fundamentals the DON will oversee the development of the nursing department structure and roles of each position and Clinical Systems: Partners with the medical director, infection preventionist and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a bed that is in safe operating condition to a resident. This deficiency affects one (R60) of three residents reviewed for bed safe operating condition. Findings include: On 5/24/22 at 12:13pm V19, Family member, approached the nursing station and complained to V4 LPN that R60's bed still not changed, and it was not operating well for the last 2 months. She said that she spoke with V2 DON and V14 Central Supply recently last Friday and they promised that they would change the bed yesterday, but it was not done. Observed long metal bar under the bed, mattress cover ripped. V4 tried to raise the bed but the bed was non-functional. On 5/24/22 at 12:37pm called V20, Maintenance Director, and showed bed of R60. V20 said that the long metal bar that fell from the bed is responsible for moving the bed up and down. V20 said the mattress vinyl covering was ripped. V19 said that it has been going on for the last 2 months and nothing was being done. V20 said that V14 only notified him last Friday that R60's bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,874 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $15,516 — penalty dated 2025-06-11
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-04-24
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 88 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 88; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOROS GENERATION TRUST U/A/D 1/3/12 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 26% | since 02/01/2023 |
| GPN FAMILY TRUST U/A/D 4/28/08 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 60% | since 02/01/2023 |
| OAKWAY OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 02/01/2023 |
| GRABEN, KATHERINE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| SHABAT, MENACHEM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| LEGACY HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $48K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145893. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.