Peterson Park Health Care Ctr
6141 North Pulaski Road, Chicago, IL 60646 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 196 certified beds · (773) 478-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $13,042 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 98.1% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.7% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.3% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.5% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.0% | 21.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.1% | 63.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.2% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.80 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.99 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 16.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.0%CMS range 25.5–55.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.1–16.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 16.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 24.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 20.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.0–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.45 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 196 beds and averages 168.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove a faulty power cord resulting in a series of orange-red sparks accompanied by puffs of smoke and a series popping noises. This deficient practice has the potential to affect one of two residents (R3) reviewed for faulty power cords and could affect all residents in the entire building, as well as an indeterminable number of staff and visitors. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9.4.2023. V1 (Administrator) was notified on 9.19.2023 at 2:14 PM of the Immediate Jeopardy. The facility presented the removal plan on 9.19.2023 at 3:14 PM. The plan was accepted on 9.20.2023 at 8:29 AM. The surveyor conducted onsite observations, interviews, and record reviews to confirm the removal plan was implemented. V1 (Administrator) was informed on 9.20.2023 that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed. Although the immediacy was removed, the facility remains out of compliance at severity level II until the facility can evaluate the effectiveness of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical abuse for two (R1, R2) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R2 sustaining an injury near the right eye and being sent to the hospital for evaluation. It can be determined that the reasonable person would have experienced psychosocial harm as a result of the physical abuse, since a reasonable person would not expect to be injured in this manner in his/her own home or a health care facility. Findings Include:R1 has diagnosis not limited to Nicotine Dependence, Cigarettes, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Acquired Absence of Right Foot, Mononeuropathy of Right Lower Limb, Complete Traumatic Amputation at Level Between Knee and Ankle, Right Lower Leg, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer, Morbid (Severe) Obesity due to Excess Calories and Major Depressive Disorder. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 15 indicating intact cognitive response.R1's Care plan document in part:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide and maintain an effective pest control program. These failures have the potential to affect 174 resident's residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 11/25/2025 at 9:53 AM, surveyor observed R159 laying on his bed free of pain. R159 is alert and oriented to person, place or time. R159 stated he has seen roaches today in the bathroom. Surveyors open the bathroom door and observe one small roach on the ground. R159 stated he has not seen an exterminator from the pest control company come in to spray medication to get rid of the roaches. On 11/25/2025 at 10:04 AM, Surveyor observed R70 sitting on the edge of the bed. R70 appears to be comfortable and free of pain. R70 is alert and oriented to person, place and time. R70 stated he has seen roaches in his bathroom, dresser, and nightstand. R70 opened his dresser, and there was live activity present of three different size roaches: small, medium and large. The roaches scattered away when the dresser door was opened. R70 stated this is nothing, I see…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual to reflect an accurate assessment for one (R109) out of six residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment reviewed in a total sample of thirty-seven. Findings Include:R109's face sheet shows he is [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and cerebral infarction, Gastrostomy status, adult failure to thrive, essential hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, developmental disorder of scholastic skills, and unspecified asthma. On 11/25/25 at 1:18 PM, R109 is seated in his wheelchair with limitations to his left hand.On 11/26/25 at 12:41 PM, V22 (Certified Occupational Therapist Assistant/COTA) stated that she has been in the facility since March 2019, and she provided exercises for R109's arms/legs due to weaknesses upon initial admission from 6/6/24 to 6/18/24. He was referred to therapy again…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to date/label and maintain proper storage of nebulizer tubing and mask when not in use for one (R3) out of one resident reviewed for respiratory care in a final sample of 37.Findings Include:On 11/25/25 at 10:01 AM, R3's resting comfortably in bed. R3's nebulizer machine was not being used, not inside a clear bag, was sitting on top of R3's nightstand. R3's nebulizer tubing mask was sitting on top of the nebulizer machine and was not inside a clear bag. R3's nebulizer tubing and mask had dates labeled 10/22/25. R3 stated he gets nebulizer treatment as needed for COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease).On 11/25/25 at 10:10 AM, V6 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated that nebulizer tubing and mask are changed weekly and as needed. V6 said the tubing and the mask should be dated when it was last changed. V6 stated that it's important to change it weekly to prevent infection and prevent fluid accumulation in the tubing. V6 said it should be stored inside a clear plastic bag and labeled with the date also to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide honey thickened liquids as ordered by the physician for one resident (R138) during an activity function in a total sample of 37.Findings Include: On 11/25/25 at 12:30 PM, observed R138 sitting at table next to V23 (Activity Aide). R138 had mechanical soft items on her lunch plate, a closed container of honey thickened milk, an opened container of honey thickened juice and an opened can of soda next to her plate of food. R138's meal ticket read mechanical altered/ground, honey thick milk. On 11/25/25 at 12:32 PM, V23 stated R138 can only drink honey thickened liquids. V23 stated the soda can is in front of R138 because R138 requested it, but R138 is not drinking it. V23 stated the soda is not thickened. On 11/25/25 at 12:35 PM, observed R138 pick up the can of soda, bring it to her mouth and take several sips of soda. Surveyor pointed this out to the V23 and V26 (Social Worker) who also observed R138 drinking the soda from the soda can. V23 and V26 stated R138 should only be drinking honey thickened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident. This failure affected 1 (R2) resident who vocalized that he felt that his life was in terrible danger when a resident (R5) slapped him on his face. Findings include: On 03/17/2025 at 12:24pm, R2 stated couple of weeks ago, we (R2 and R8) were talking about car insurance, when he (R5) slapped me with his open right hand above my temple. I did not know what to do. When his hand landed on my face, I felt I was in a terrible danger. On 03/17/2025 at 12:16pm, R8 stated I did observed (R5) hitting (R2) a couple of weeks ago. He (R5) hit him (R2) on the face. I was talking to him (R2), and he (R5) hit him on his face with open hand on the left side of his (R2) face. He (R5) said he was upset because he (R2) was talking to me. The intent was to physically harm him, and he said I told you I don't want you in my room. On 03/19/2025 at 2:21pm, V22 (Licensed Practice Nurse) stated I was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure kitchen tongs and measurement pitchers were properly cleaned and sanitized and food was removed and discarded from the prep refrigerator by the use by date This failure has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings Include: On 09/17/24 at 09:34 the surveyor entered the kitchen for the initial tour with V14 (Dietary Manager). Red rice/chicken was observed in the prep refrigerator dated 07/12/24 - 07/16/24. V14 stated the wrong month was written on there but today is 09/17/24. On 09/18/24 at 09:35 AM the surveyor entered the kitchen. The Menu dated Wednesday 09/18/24 consisted of Beef Ravioli, Italian Parmesan, Medley Mixed Vegetables, French Garlic Bread and Pineapple Up-side Down Cake. On 09/18/24 at 09:47 AM V18 (Cook) place Steak burgers in a pan using tongs on top of stove. On 09/18/24 at 10:14 AM V18 (Cook) removed a green bucket from under the prep table near the sink, used a sponge that was in the green bucket and washed the tongs. On 09/18/24 at 10:16 AM V18 (Cook) used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure contracted staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while caring for a resident (R34) on Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) and failed to ensure proper linen storage/handling. These failures have the potential to affect all 171 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: R34's admission Record documents in part medical diagnoses of gastrostomy status and encounter for attention to gastrostomy. R34's care plan documents in part that R34 is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (initiated 7/13/2023). Interventions include Ensure that gown and gloves are used during high-contact resident are activities (like dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, Device care or use for those with central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator, and Wound care for any skin opening requiring a dressing) that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs [multi-drug resistant organisms] to staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide supervision of residents during a smoking break and demonstrate competency and knowledge related to safety measures and equipment for the smoking patio and failed to secure first and second floor soiled utility rooms that contained sharps and infectious waste containers. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents who are identified as smokers (R15, R26, R40, R59, R75, R87, R93, R95, R111, R112, R117, R125, R128, R129, R137, R149, R151, R154, R159, R160, R163, R170, R171) and all ambulatory residents that reside on the first and second floors, in the sample of 35. Findings include: On 9/19/2024 at 9:35 AM, approximately 10 residents observed on the Smoking Patio. V26 (Activity Aide) observed helping wheelchair bound residents on to and off the smoking patio; no staff observed stationed on the patio to monitor residents during smoking break. On 9/19/2024 at 9:42 AM, V24 (Activity Aide) said we don't stay on the patio the whole time, we go out there periodically. V24 said I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications from enteral feeding for 2 (R35, R132) of 6 residents reviewed for enteral feedings. The facility also failed to ensure expired enteral feeding products were removed and unavailable to be administered to residents. This failure has the potential to affect 2 (R29, R36) residents that receive enteral nutritional feedings. Findings Include: 1. R35 has diagnosis not limited to Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Adult Failure to Thrive, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia, Bilateral, Indeterminate Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Restlessness and Agitation, Dysphagia, Dementia, unspecified Severity, with Agitation, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Gastrostomy Status, Ulcer of Esophagus, Vitamin D Deficiency, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region and Personal History of other Diseases of the Digestive System. R35's MDS (Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed and unavailable to be administered to residents. This failure has the potential to affect all residents receiving medications from the 2 North Front medication cart. Findings include: On 9/17/24 at 3:07 PM, reviewed 2 North front medication cart with V2 (Director of Nursing) and observed: -Gas Relief Simethicone 80mg chewable tablets with expiration date 8/24. On 9/19/24 at 11:55 AM, V27 (Registered Nurse) stated there should not be expired medications in the medication carts or medication rooms. If a resident is given an expired medication, it can harm the resident. On 9/19/24 at 12:10 PM, V8 (Infection Control Nurse) stated there should not be expired medications in the medication carts or medication rooms. It can be dangerous to the residents to have expired products administered to them. On 9/19/24 at 1:54 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated there should be no expired medications or enteral feedings in the medication carts or medication rooms. Residents could have an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the menu for residents receiving a pureed diet. This failure has the potential to affect 19 residents receiving a pureed diet. Findings Include: On 09/18/24 at 11:29 AM the kitchen staff began plating from the steam table. Staff was observed plating pureed ravioli, pureed medley mixed vegetable and mash potatoes to be served for the residents that receive a pureed diet. There was no pureed bread served. On 09/19/24 at 03:25 PM V20 (Registered Dietician) stated If it says a pureed bread item on the meal ticket the resident should be receiving it. The residents on the pureed diet should have received ravioli, mixed vegetables, French garlic bread and pineapple upside down cake. The residents could receive mashed potatoes in place of the bread. That would not be following the menu. The mashed potatoes would be a substitution and be marked in the substitution binder. There is a binder in the kitchen if there is not enough of an item, I need to give this as a substitution and I would have to sign off on it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to place a hand splint to the left hand for contracture management for 1 (R145) resident reviewed for range of motion in a sample of 35. Findings Include: R145 has diagnosis not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Cerebral Infarction due to Unspecified Occlusion or Stenosis of Right Middle Cerebral Artery, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia Following Cerebral Infarction, Dysarthria Following Cerebral Infarction, Facial Weakness Following Cerebral Infarction, Occlusion and Stenosis of Unspecified Carotid Artery and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. R145's MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 15 indicating intact cognitive response. Order Summary Report dated 09/18/24 document in part: Apply resting hand splint and elbow on left hand and PRAFO (pressure relief ankle foot orthosis) on BLE (Bilateral lower extremities) for 4 hours daily as tolerated. Care Plan document in part: Focus: R145 has an ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change an intravenous catheter dressing timely for 1 (R33) resident reviewed for intravenous catheter care in a sample of 35. Findings Include: R33 has diagnosis not limited to Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Personal History of Malignant Neoplasm of Thyroid, Personal History of Malignant Neoplasm of other Parts of Uterus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Morbid (Severe) Obesity due to Excess Calories, Hypothyroidism, Hyperlipidemia, Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Region, Osteophyte, Vertebrae, Disorder of Bone, Adult Failure to Thrive, Restlessness and Agitation, Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), and Cerebral Infarction, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Lumbar Region, Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region , Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety, Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Knee, Primary Osteoarthritis, Left Hand, Arthropathy, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Ankylosing Spondylitis of Multiple Sites in Spine, Spondylosis, Polyarthritis, Major Depressive Disorder, Adjustment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food items in a residents personal refrigerator was labeled and dated for one resident (R143) reviewed in a total sample of 35 residents. Findings include: R143 has diagnosis not limited to Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Spastic Hemiplegia Affecting Right Dominant Side, Hyperlipidemia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with other Diabetic Neurological Complication and Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction. R143's Care plan document in part: R143 has a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Interventions: Monitor compliance with diet and document any problems. On 09/17/24 at 12:03 PM surveyor entered R143 room and asked it was okay to check his refrigerator. R143 responded, yes. Two undated sandwiches and 2 undated chocolate chip cookies wrapped in clear plastic wrap were observed in R143's refrigerator. On 09/17/24 at 12:07 PM surveyor asked V15 (Licensed Practical Nurse) who is responsible for checking the resident refrigerators and discarding undated and expired items. V15 responded, any nurse can check the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a functioning call light system for one (R14) resident in a total sample of 35 residents reviewed. Findings include: On 09/17/2024 at 11:50AM, surveyor located inside of R14's room. R14 asks surveyor to assist her with finding her television remote control referring to it as the clicker. R14 states she wants her remote control so that she can change the channel on her television. Surveyor informs R14 that she should press her call light for staff assistance with her remote control. R14 then picks up her call light pad and continuously press her call light pad while stating that she has been pressing it for a long time already and no one has come to her room to assist her. Surveyor observes that when R14 presses her call light several times, the call light does not illuminate above R14's room door and no audible sound is heard. Surveyor observes that R14's call light is plugged into the wall. On 09/17/2024 at 11:53AM, surveyor makes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-20 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles by not scheduling service plan meetings for the [NAME] Consent Decree Program in an effort to transition residents back into the community. This failure has the potential to affect 28 residents residing in the facility. Finding include: On 05/18/2024 at 11:48AM, V7 (Social Services Director/SSD) states she has been the SSD at the facility since February 2023. V7 states she is one of the people responsible for helping with the [NAME] Program. V7 states upon admission, the facility provides the resident with the [NAME] Program fact sheet. V7 states it usually takes 60 days for a [NAME] representative to come to the facility and assess the resident to be transitioned back into the community. V7 states there has been a lot of issues getting case managers from the [NAME] Program assigned to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-18 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed assert the right of the resident by failing to ensure a resident's personal belongings were inventoried upon readmission to the facility. This failure affects one (R1) resident out of three residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: R1's Facesheet documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. R1 was discharged from the facility on [DATE], R1 expired on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 1:40PM, V12 (Activities Director) states she has been working at the facility since [DATE]. V12 states when a resident is admitted to the facility, their belongings are inventoried and documented in their electronic health record. V12 states all residents who are admitted to the facility should have a resident inventory form placed in their electronic health record. V12 states not one person is responsible for handling the resident's belongings when they are admitted . V12 states she has seen staff such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff providing care and services to a resident who has a feeding tube is competent in and utilize facility protocols regarding feeding tube nutrition and care. This failure affects one (R2) resident receiving enteral nutrition feedings out of three residents reviewed. Findings include: On 03/16/2024 at 11:13AM, surveyor enters R2's room and observes V10 (Wound Care Technician) providing care for R2. R2's enteral feeding pump observed off while V10 is providing care to R2. V10 states R2 does not have any wounds but V10 is applying bandages and cushioning to R2's legs to prevent pressure ulcers. Surveyor observes R2's right leg contracted and folded over R2's left leg. V10 observed placing padding and bandages in between where R2's right leg comes in contact with R2's left leg. V10 observed completing applying bandages and is observed putting R2's head of bed at 90 degrees. V10 observed turning R2's enteral feeding pump on. V10 states he is not a nurse. V10 states he is the person who turned R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to document on the individual residents controlled drug administration record for 5 residents (R124, R167, R75, R67 and R159). This failure has the potential to affect all 172 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 10/17/2023 at 2:27PM surveyor with V22(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) reviewed the two north medication cart Controlled Drug Administration Records for the following residents R159, R75 and R67(these forms are used by the facility for accountability of controlled substances after the controlled substance medication is administered to the individual resident). The controlled drug administration records were not signed after the administration of the controlled substance to the resident. On 10/17/2023 at 2:28PM R159's MAR(medication administration record) documents R159 was administered one tablet of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Oral tablet 5-325mg(milligrams)- Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed on 10/17/2023 at 12:14. Upon review of R159's controlled drug administration record the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary shower room and bathroom for residents on the north wing of the first floor. This failure has the potential to affect all 46 residents on the north wing of the first floor. Findings include: On 10/16/23 at 10:30am after the entrance conference, V1(Administrator) presented the facility's census that show that 46 residents reside on the north wing of the first floor. On 10/16/23 at 11:10am, the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with dried brownish material on the edges and on the top of the toilet, and with the garbage full and overflowing with some material on the floor of the bathroom. R92 (a resident from room [ROOM NUMBER] on the north wing of the first floor) told the surveyor in the hallway that he could not use the bathroom because it was filthy. The surveyor tried to look around for a housekeeper. Again, on 10/16 23 at 11:53am, the bathroom was still in the same condition. At this time, V32(Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of cigarette odor and failed to consider nonsmoking residents on the first floor of the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 55 non-smoking residents on the first floor. Findings include: On 10/16/23 at 10:30am after the entrance conference, V1(Administrator) presented the facility's census that show that 74 residents reside on the first floor. On 10/19/23 at 11:01am, V1 presented a list that shows that there are 19 smokers and 55 nonsmokers on the first floor. On 10/17/23 between 9:45am and 10:15am, the surveyor smelled a strong cigarette odor in the front lobby, and in the dining room and in the hallway of the whole first floor. The surveyor called V1(Administrator) to confirm the strong cigarette odor. V1 stated that it was due to some residents leaving the door to the smoking area open after they finish smoking. V1 stated that he(V1) would educate the staff that supervise smoking to ensure that the door is always closed to prevent cigarette smoke from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's lower extremity and incontinence brief were covered for dignity. This failure affected 1 (R142) resident reviewed for dignity in the total sample of 59 residents. Findings include: On 10/16/2023 at 3:45pm, R142 was on a highback chair across the 1st floor South nurse's station. R142's right thigh and incontinence brief were exposed. There was a blanket between R142 legs. R104 was also seated on a wheelchair across the nurse's station with R142. At this time, two staff were by the nurse's station. One of the staff was V12 (Registered Nurse) who was writing on a piece of paper. This surveyor inquired who the nurse assigned to R142 was. V12 (Registered Nurse) stated I (V12) am the nurse for (R142). Surveyor inquired what's with R142's exposed right thigh and incontinence brief. V12 lifted his (V12) eyes and stated (R142) has Huntington's disease; she (R142) moves a lot. After this statement, V12 continued what he (V12) was doing. On 10/16/2023 at 3:47pm, two staff tried to cover R142's exposed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for two residents (R164 and R18) in the sample of 59 residents. Findings include: On 10/16/23 12:17 PM surveyor observed brown stain approximately one square foot in size in the ceiling located adjacent to the room door. R164 stated it has been like that since I moved into this room. R164 stated I have not seen water dripping from the ceiling area where the brown spot is located. On 10/16/23 12:37 PM survey observed the baseboard near the floor behind R18's bed hanging off the wall. On 10/18/2023 at 11:35am V23(Maintenance Director) observed the brown stain in the ceiling of R164's room and stated when the heavy rain came earlier this year there were some water leaks from the main roof. V23 stated I patched the main roof and stopped some of the leaking. V23 stated I need to repatch this part of the ceiling. V23 stated maintenance is responsible for fixing the plastic baseboard hanging from the wall. R18's diagnosis include but are not limited to Unspecified Convulsions ,Personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility to provide nail care to two residents (R7, R77) out of a sample size of 59. R7 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Dysphagia. Brief Interview of Mental Status score is 13 that indicates cognitively intact. R77 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Vascular Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia and Cerebral Infarction. R77's Brief Interview of Mental Status score is 13 that indicates cognitively intact. Findings: On 10/16/2023 at 11:00am surveyor observed R7 with long fingernails on the right hand. R7 stated that she would like her fingernails cut, but staff say they will cut them but they don't ever come back to cut them. On 10/18/2023 at 11:55am surveyor observed R77 fingernails long on both hands. R77 stated that they cut his nails sometimes and he would like them to be cut. On 10/18/2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care/podiatry care for a resident. This failure affects one resident (R92) in a sample of 59 residents, reviewed for foot care. Findings include: On 10/16 23 at 11:10am on the first floor, R92 was observed in the hallway with the toenails on both feet very thick and yellow with dry scaly skin on both feet and around the toes. On 10/17/23 at 12:30pm, R92's feet were still in the same condition. On 10/18/23 at 1:40pm, V3(Director of Nursing) was asked about how a resident gets to see a Podiatrist for foot care. V3 stated that the nurses usually put down the names of the residents in a book at the nursing station for the Podiatrist. The surveyor went with V3 to the nursing station on the first floor, and V3 stated that the Podiatrist list is somewhere in her(V2's) office. V3 explained that R92 was admitted in the past 3 weeks (9/27/23) and that she(V3) will add R92 to the list for the Podiatrist. R92's POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated 9/27/23 states: May see Podiatrist as needed. Facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of <5% for 1 (R68) of 4 (R68, R91, R132, and R161) residents reviewed for medication administration. There were 32 opportunities and 4 errors resulting in 12.5% medication administration error rate. Findings include: On 10/17/2023 at 8:51am, V10 (Registered Nurse) started dispensing the following medications for R68: 1. Pro-Stat 30ml. 2. Arginaid 4.5grams orange flavor mixed well with 180ml of water 3. Vitamin C. 500mg tablet 4. Eliquis 5mg tablet 5. Iron tablet 325/65mg tablet 6. Furosemide 40mg tablet 7. Losartan 100mg tablet 8. Valproic Acid 250mg/5ml dispensed 10ml. On 10/17/2023 at 9:00am, V10 counted the medications and stated there are five tablets and 3 liquid medications for a total of 8 medications. On 10/17/2023 at 9:27am, V10 administered R68's medications via g-tube. R68's (Schedule date 10/17/2023 - 10/17/2023) Medication Administration Audit Report documented that R68 was also administered the following medications at 9:59am and was documented at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly log refrigerator temperatures for two resident's (R91, R16) personal refrigerators. This failure has the potential to affect all 59 residents in the sample. R16 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Cerebral Infarction, Non-Pressure Chronic Ulcer of Right Calf with Fat Layer Exposed, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertension. R16's Brief Interview of Mental Status score is 15 that indicates cognitively intact. R16's admission date is 8/01/2022. R91 has a diagnosis of Atrioventricular Block, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Hypothyroidism, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Psychosis. R91 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14 that indicates cognitively intact. R91 admission date is 10/08/2020. Findings: On 10/16/2023 at about 11:15am surveyor observed R16's Daily Refrigerator Log for 2023 with only 3 temperatures on it. R16 stated, no, the refrigerator temperature is not being checked every day. On 10/16/2023 at 11:47am surveyor observed R91's Daily Refrigerator Log for 2023 with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who depends on staff's assistance for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care call device was responded to in a timely manner. This failure affected one resident (R1) out of four residents reviewed for ADL care. Findings include: R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 07/10/23 shows that R1 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates that R1 is cognitively intact. R1 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to: Left knee resistance to unilateral primary osteoarthritis, lymph edema, asthma, anemia, major depression non rheumatic aortic valve stenosis, liver disease, atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia. On 10/02/23 at 11:39 am, R1 was observed in bed awake and alert with R1's call device activated. Surveyor observed V12 (License Practical Nurse, LPN) R1's nurse in the 1 south unit hallway outside of R1's room at V12's medication cart while R1's call device was activated and sounding for assistance. R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident (R1) who depend on staff's assistance for their ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care received showers/bed baths. This failure affected one out of four residents reviewed for ADL care and showers. Findings include: R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 07/10/23 shows that R1 has a BIMS score of 15 which indicates that R1 is cognitively intact. R1 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to: Left knee resistance to unilateral primary osteoarthritis, lymph edema, asthma, anemia, major depression non rheumatic aortic valve stenosis, liver disease, atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia. On 10/02/23 at 11:39 am, R1 was observed in room in bed awake and alert. R1 was asked regarding the last time R1 received a shower at the facility. R1 stated, R1 last received a shower on 09/11/23. R1 explained, on 09/11/23 was the last time that staff at the facility offered and gave R1 a shower. R1 stated, R1 has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0572 — isolatedGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and complete admission contracts to three of five residents (R1, R3, and R5) upon admission to the facility. Findings include: On 9.14.2023 at 11:51 AM, V5 and V6 (Family Members) said, they did not sign any paperwork (Admissions Contract) when R3 was admitted to the facility. On 9.14.2023 at 3:11PM, V1 (Administrator) said, I don't know what's up with her (R3) contract. Either V19 (Administrative Assistant/Guest Relations/Admissions) did not upload it, or it wasn't done. There should be a contract; we can't find it, were looking for it. Facility was unable to provide a contract for R3. On 9.20.2203 at 10:15 AM, V19 (Administrative Assistant/Guest Relations/Admissions) said, the Admissions Department is responsible for obtaining a signed contract for each resident, when the resident comes in, we obtain a contract, The contract is signed by the resident's family or whoever is their responsible party. The contract is signed within 72 hours but if not then as soon as possible. We put it into the admission file. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that facility staff did not store their personal belongings in a resident's closet for one (R3) of five residents reviewed for homelike environment. Findings include: On 9.13.2023 at 2:21 PM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) said, DON said, V8 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) left her belongings in R3's closet. V2 said there is a locker room in the basement where staff can place their belongings; staff should not place their belongings in a resident's room. On 9.14.2023 at 11:51 AM, V5 (Family Member) said during telephone interview, there were items in her closet that were not hers. I sent pictures to V4 (Social Service Designee). On 9.14.2023 at 12:24 PM, V4 (Social Service Designee) said, yes, I was sent a picture (of R3's closet). In the picture there was a wig, a few belongings, some clothing items that were in a folded pile. R3's previous roommate had a wig. V5's (Family Member) concern was that the wig and clothing belonged to an employee. Surveyor noted a wig, water bottle, jacket and backpack in the picture of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$13,042 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $13,042 — penalty dated 2023-09-22
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-14 for 6 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 88 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 88; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPA LTD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 11/29/2011 |
| RAJCHENBACH, CHAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 11/29/2011 |
| SHABAT, MENACHEM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 9% | since 11/29/2011 |
| SHABAT, RONALD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 69% | since 11/29/2011 |
| ESTERSOHN, STEVEN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/17/2022 |
| SHABAT, AHUVA | Individual | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 11/29/2011 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145838. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.