Park View Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 46.0 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-09-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Resident #1 had wounds that were deteriorating. The resident was seen in the wound center. The facility sent the assessment of the wound in a fax to the PCP on 8/21/25 and wrote the resident would be seen in the wound center 8/22/25. The PCP replied okay. The PCP was not the wound center provider. The resident did not have an appointment on 8/22/25. The facility did not follow up until 8/27/25 with an assessment. The fax notified the wound center physician that the wound deteriorated and had a foul odor. The physician ordered a different treatment until seen on 8/29/25. The nurse who did the assessment had hoped he would want to see her sooner, but did not convey that in the fax. The resident admitted to the hospital 8/28/25 in respiratory distress, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2). Resident #1 fell on 7/10/25 fracturing his right elbow that would require surgical repair, and a laceration near his right eye requiring 7 sutures. The resident had a pressure alarm that did not sound to alert staff the resident was getting up without assistance. Staff failed to determine why the alarm did not sound. On 7/11/25 the resident fell again fracturing his left elbow, also requiring surgical repair. The resident's pressure alarm again failed to sound to alert staff the resident was getting up. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include:The Care Plan documented Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Care Plan identified the resident had impaired cognitive function, and at risk for falls, on 7/10/25 at 10:30 a.m. fall with no injury, on 7/10/25 at 2:07 p.m. fall with right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that only licensed staff administered medications. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that narcotics were counted only by qualified personnel authorized to manage controlled substances, and that licensed nursing staff completed the shift-to-shift narcotic count together. These failures allowed an unlicensed staff member (CNA) to attempt medication administration and perform narcotic counts, both beyond their scope of practice. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 6/10/26 at 10:23 AM, Staff B, CNA, stated that agency nurse Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), asked if she attended nursing school. Staff B confirmed she had and would graduate if she passed her final test in May. Later, Staff C informed Staff B that Resident #3 would not take her medications. Staff B reported that Staff C stood in the doorway and pressured her to help administer the medications to Resident #3. Staff B stated, I hate confrontation. Staff C handed me her med cup,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that medication cart keys were secured and handled exclusively by qualified personnel, allowing a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), who is unauthorized to manage controlled substances, to possess the keys and conduct narcotic counts. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings Include: During an interview on 6/10/26 at 10:23 AM, Staff B, CNA, admitted she performed narcotic counts with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and Staff D, LPN, separately, rather than together as directed by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). Although Staff B stated she lacked the licensure to conduct counts, she claimed Staff C, LPN, insisted she participate and sign the documentation. Staff B noted she performed counts with each nurse individually, remarking that the CNAs were caught in the middle. During an interview on 6/10/26 at 2:03 PM, Staff D, LPN, reported that on 4/21/26, she witnessed Staff B, CNA, perform a narcotic medication count and receive a resident nurse report from Staff C, LPN. Staff D reported that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's physician and responsible party were notified regarding the failure to administer prescribed, scheduled medications including a high-risk medications for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and #2). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of anal canal, renal insufficiency and malnutrition. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of the April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #1 showed the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated by documentation on the MAR the following evening mediations were not administered on 4/21/26:Clonidine for hypertensionMetoprolol for hypertensionSertraline for depressionCefuroxine Axetil for abnormal findings in the lung fieldKlor-Con for low potassium 2.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from significant medication errors. On 4/21/26, staff failed to administer scheduled evening medications for 2 of 3 resident reviewed (Resident #1 and #2). Instead, the medications were found in envelopes stapled to the residents' respective medication bubble packs. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of anal canal, renal insufficiency and malnutrition. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of the April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #1 showed the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated by documentation on the MAR the following evening mediations were not administered on 4/21/26:Clonidine for hypertensionMetoprolol for hypertensionSertraline for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the record review and interviews with facility staff, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation of medication administration as not administered on 4/21/26 for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #2). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of anal canal, renal insufficiency and malnutrition. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of the April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #1 showed the following medications as administered. The Director of Nursing (DON) indicated by documentation on the MAR the following evening mediations were confirmed as not administered on 4/21/26:Clonidine for hypertensionMetoprolol for hypertensionSertraline for depressionCefuroxine Axetil for abnormal findings in the lung fieldKlor-Con for low potassium 2. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident council meetings, Electronic Health Record (EHR)review, document review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 4 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #27, #53, #11 and #15). The facility reported a census of 45 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented Resident #27 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and taking off footwear. On 3/9/26 at 12:28 PM Resident #27 stated he has had to wait up to 45 minutes in the last week or two for his call light to be answered. Review of Resident #27's EHR documented Resident #27 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Review of facility provided call light log for Resident #27 in room [ROOM NUMBER] from 3/4/26 - 3/11/26 revealed call lights that had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards by not completing appropriate hand hygiene during meal service to prevent cross contamination, not dating open food items and not disposing of expired food items. The facility reported a census of 45 residents.Findings include:Observation on 3/9/26 at 10:10 AM of a 2 door refrigerator revealed these food items open and undated 16 oz. container of parmesan cheese and a bag of diced chicken.Observation on 3/9/26 at 10:14 AM of a 2 door freezer revealed a large bag of bacon bits and a large bag of chicken cordon bleu both open and undated.Observation on 3/9/26 at 10:16 AM of a 3 door freezer revealed a plastic container containing about 10 biscuits and a large bag of cinnamon rolls open and undated. A box of pre-cooked hamburgers with bag open and box top cut away with food items on the shelf above and a box of pre-cooked omelets with the bag open and box top cut away with the hamburger box on the shelf above. Observation on 3/9/26 at 10:20 AM of dry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to have the necessary required members attend quarterly quality assurance meetings. The facility reported a census of 45 residents.Findings include:Review of facility provided documents titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee Attendance Record for the months of August 2025 through February 2026 revealed there was no Infection Preventionist (IP) that attended the Quality Assurance (QA) meetings. Interview on 3/12/26 at 8:51 AM with the Administrator revealed that the facility did not have an IP until the new Director of Nursing (DON) came to the facility to work. Follow up interview on 3/12/26 11:13 AM with the Administrator confirmed the IP was not present at the meetings from August of last year to February of this year. The Administrator then revealed her expectation would be to have an IP at the meetings per expectations.Review of a facility provided document titled, QAPI Policy with a revision date 10/2023 revealed:a. The members of the QAPI committee must meet at least…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, Medication Administration Records - Treatment Administration Records (MAR-TAR), resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide an opportunity for bath or shower and failed to apply edema wear as ordered by the physician to 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4, #27 and #11). The facility reported a census of 45 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented Resident #4 required partial / moderate assistance to shower/bathe self with staff doing less than half the effort. On 3/10/26 at 9:28 AM Resident #4 said she was supposed to receive baths on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Resident #4 explained she would like a shower twice a week. Resident #4 said she was supposed to wear edema socks but has not had them in a couple of months. On 3/10/26 at 9:44 AM an observation in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) services to a resident with limited ROM to prevent further decrease in range of motion or development of contractures for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4 and #9). The facility reported a census of 45.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented Resident #4 required partial / moderate assistance to shower/bathe self with staff doing less than half the effort.On 3/10/26 at 9:39 AM Resident #4 stated when she came in she had therapy and then it stopped. Resident #4 stated she could walk down the hall with a walker and did not need a wheelchair when she was in therapy. Resident #4 explained she used a walker now. Resident #4 stated she would like to have some therapy and had spoken to someone about therapy.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 79 rows in the source record cover these 43 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $645K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA