Avantara Saint Cloud
302 St Cloud Street, Rapid City, SD 57701 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 78 certified beds · (605) 343-4738 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $24,751 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-13)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 36.6% | 21.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 5.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.8% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 38.0% | 5.7% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 9.2% | 5.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 30.3% | 19.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.2% | 17.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.7% | 96.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.8% | 4.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.0% | 25.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 56.8% | 24.6% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 42.5% | 19.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.9% | 12.0% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.46 | 1.52 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.92 | 1.75 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 15.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 72.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
17 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that the physician was promptly notified of a change in condition for review and recommendations to ensure prompt assessment and treatment for one of one sampled resident (1) identified to be vomiting and with increased weakness, by one of one registered nurse (RN) E. This failure resulted in resident 1 being transferred to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation and subsequent hospitalization. The provider also failed to notify the resident's first emergency contact of the resident's change in condition. Findings include:1. Review of the provider's submitted SD DOH FRI initial report regarding resident 1revealed that on the morning of 2/11/26, resident 1experienced three to four episodes of bile-colored vomit between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. She appeared more tired, but she was able to vocalize her needs. Certified nurse aide (CNA) H notified the day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by having failed to ensure the safety of one of one sampled resident (1) who sustained femur (thigh bone) fractures after being transferred from her wheelchair to her bed by two of two certified nursing assistants (D and E) who did not follow her care plan or the facility's policy for gait belt (a waist strap gripped as support for safe mobility and transfers) use; and by one of one licensed practical nurse (LPN) C who did not perform a physical assessment of resident 1 after being notified by CNA D and CNA E of the transfer. The failure of the CNAs to follow resident 1's care plan and the provider's policy regarding the use of a gait belt when transferring a resident may have resulted in the fractures to both of her femur bones. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on the corrective actions the provider implemented immediately following the incident. Findings include: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-10-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (19) who had a history of moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) and had a current pressure ulcer (PU) had physician-ordered interventions implemented to promote healing. Findings include: 1. Observations of resident 19 revealed: *On 10/24/23 at 10:00 a.m. she laid on her left side in bed with a pillow positioned behind her back to help her maintain that position. -The mattress on her bed was blue. *On 10/25/23 at 4:45 p.m. she was seated on a ROHO cushion (a pressure reducing device) in her tilt-in-space wheelchair (a customized wheelchair) in her room in front of the television. -There was a pool of liquid on the floor beneath the seat of her wheelchair that appeared to have been urine. *On 10/26/23 at 8:45 a.m. she was transferred by staff from her wheelchair to her bed to have her incontinence brief changed, barrier cream applied to her sacrum, and then she was positioned onto her left side. Review of resident 19's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that physician orders for an antibiotic, a medicated nebulizer (a device that converts liquid medication into an inhalable mist) treatment, and cough syrup were transcribed and initiated by one of one registered nurse (RN) F which resulted in a delay of treatment for one of one sampled resident 2, which potentially contributed to his transfer to the emergency room (ER). This citation is considered past non-compliance based on a review of the corrective actions the provider implemented following the incident.Findings include:1. Review of the provider's 3/4/26 submitted SD DOH FRI report regarding resident 2 revealed that on 3/3/26, RN F reported that resident 2 was experiencing symptoms of cough and congestion to physician assistant-certified (PA-C) D. PA-C D then saw (evaluated) resident 2 at the facility. PA-C D reported to RN F and the director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure medications and biologicals were labeled, stored, and discarded regarding:*Expired medications and supplies were discarded in two of two observed storage rooms.*One of one medication cart that was left unattended and unlocked by one of one registered nurse (RN) (I) in the dining room, where residents, unauthorized staff, and visitors could access it. *Medications with shortened expiration dates (medications that expire in a timeframe after opening that is prior to the manufacturer's expiration date) stored in one of one medication carts were labeled when they were opened. Findings include:1. Observation on 1/26/26 at 1:52 p.m. in the main storage room revealed: *One box of a three-layer compression bandage system [bandages layered to provide sustained and cushioned compression for treating venous issues such as leg wounds with swelling) that expired on 9/6/24. *One box of Optifoam AG Nonadhesive Dressing with Antibacterial Silver (non-stick dressing infused with silver to act as an antibacterial agent)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *One of one observed certified nursing assistant (F) who assisted three of three sampled residents (62, 56, and 22) with eating during one of one observed noon meal service. *One of one observed licensced practical nurse (E) who assisted two of two sampled residents (1 and 38) with eating during one of one noon meal service. Findings include: 1. Observation on 1/25/26 at 11:53 a.m. in the main dining room during the noon meal revealed: *Resident 62, 56, and 22 sat at the same dining table (table 6). *Certified nursing assistant (CNA) F helped resident 62 apply a clothing protector, moved her wheelchair closer to the dining room table, and locked resident 62's wheels. *Without washing or sanitizing her hands, CNA F went to the serving counter and picked up two meal plates and served them to the residents. She returned to the serving counter and used an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) to sanitize her hands. She picked up two meal plates and served them to two other residents. *CNA F then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure staff followed professional standards of practice regarding the respiratory care for one of one sampled resident (78), who received oxygen when he previously resided at a hospital from [DATE] through his admission to the provider's facility on 1/21/26, when staff failed to clarify and provide the resident's oxygen needs. Findings include:1. Observation and interview on 1/25/2026 at 1:49 p.m. with resident 78 in his room revealed:*He was sitting in his recliner chair with an oxygen concentrator machine (a device that filters room air into purified oxygen) stored between the chair and his bed. *There was a plastic storage bag attached to the oxygen concentrator machine, which had 1/26/26 and initials handwritten on it in black ink.*An unopened package of Procure brand seven-foot nasal cannula (a flexible tube with two prongs inserted into the nostrils to deliver oxygen) was sitting on his bedside table. *He thought he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint intake, interview, report review, facility assessment review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure daily posted staffing information was updated to reflect the actual number of nursing staff and the hours those staff had worked on three of four overnight shifts reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of the 6/23/25 SD DOH complaint intake report revealed the complainant was concerned there is not enough staff to care for the residents. The complainant wished to have their identity protected. 2. Interview on 7/3/25 at 9:20 a.m. with the complainant revealed: *The complainant had assumed the overnight shift was short-staffed because there were constant [job] postings for that shift. -The complainant was not able to provide specific dates or times when it was thought the overnight shift had been short-staffed. 3. Review of the provider's 6/25/25 facility assessment revealed one to two licensed nurses were needed during the overnight shift to ensure the needs of the residents had been met. Three to four CNAs were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI) review, record review, observation, and interview, the provider failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse for two of two sampled cognitively impaired residents (1 and 2) by one of one certified nursing assistant (CNA) (C). This citation is considered past non?compliance based on a review of the corrective actions the provider implemented immediately following the incident. Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 1/2/25 SD DOH FRI revealed: *On 1/2/25, dementia champion E reported CNA C forcibly grabs her [resident 1] arms back and forces her [resident 1] down to the chair, forces her [resident 1] to bend her [resident 1] knees, and she [resident 1] started crying. *CNA C was suspended immediately, pending investigation. *A full investigation was initiated that included staff interviews, video surveillance, and immediate notification to administrator/abuse coordinator A. *After the investigation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, job description review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *The kitchen and dishroom were maintained in a clean and functional manner. *Food items placed on trays and delivered to residents to eat in their rooms (room trays) were kept covered during transport until they were delivered to their rooms. *Insulated dinner plate covers were handled in a sanitary manner. Findings include: 1. Observation and interviews with food service manager (FSM) E, cook N, and dietary aide O on 11/4/24 from 5:00 p.m. through 6:40 p.m. during the initial kitchen tour and the evening meal service revealed: *Plastic drinking cups were being filled for the evening meal by cook N. -Twelve of 20 unfilled cups on one of two trays had white-colored build-up on their bottoms and/or their insides. Scratch-like marks on the insides resembled scrub brush marks. *FSM E stated the cup discoloration was lime build-up and commented to cook P Are you the only one who knows how to use a brush? *One side of the dual plate warmer near the serving area held regular plates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to maintain the environment and resident use items in a clean and odor-free condition for: *A soiled utility room located directly across from the entrance into the secured unit. *Two of sixteen sampled resident rooms (103 and 108) located in the 100 hallway. *One of one laundry room. *One of one clean utility room located in the secured unit. *A urine-soaked chair from one of one sampled resident's (58) room. Findings include: 1. Observation during the initial tour on 11/4/24 at 12:45 p.m. revealed a strong urine odor upon entrance through the double doors that led into the secured unit of the building where the 100, 200, and 400 hallways were located. Observation on 11/5/24 at 1:48 p.m. and at 1:52 p.m. revealed a strong urine odor was again present upon entrance into the secured unit described above. *A soiled utility room was located directly across the hall from the entrance into the secured unit. -That room had soiled linen and garbage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, South Dakota (SD) State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program handbook review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *Window coverings in 12 of 14 resident rooms (301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 309, 311, 312, 314, and 316) located in the 300 Hall had protected those residents' right to privacy. *Window coverings in 5 of 9 resident rooms (105, 107, 111, 113, and 115) located in the 100 hall had protected those residents' right to privacy. *One of 14 residents' (2) electronic medical records (EMR) were secured and not accessible to other residents, staff, or the public. *One of two medication carts were locked and medications were not accessible to other residents, staff, and the public by one of one registered nurse (RN) J in the Main dining room during the noon medication pass. Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/4/24 at 7:15 p.m. on the sidewalk leading to the main entrance of the facility revealed: *Resident rooms on the north side of the 300 hallway ran parallel to that sidewalk. -The windows in those rooms faced the visitor's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for: *8 of 14 resident rooms (301, 303, 304, 309, 311, 312, 314, and 316) on the 300 hallway. *5 of 22 resident rooms (202, 204, 206, 207 and 209) on the 200 hallway. *6 of 23 resident rooms (103, 104, 108, 110, 115, and 117) on the 100 hallway. Findings include: 1. Random observations on 11/5/24 between 9:30 a.m. and 3:35 p.m. inside the rooms on the 300 hallway revealed: *room [ROOM NUMBER] had areas of exposed sheetrock near the foot and head of the bed, and behind the headboard of that bed which was positioned along the wall beneath the window. -There was an area of exposed sheetrock near the head of another bed that was positioned along the wall near the doorway of that room. *In room [ROOM NUMBER], the recliner's headrest was worn and no longer a cleanable surface. *room [ROOM NUMBER]: There was an area approximately 12 inches by 12 inches on the wall beneath the window near the foot of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, policy review, and South Dakota (SD) State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program handbook review, the provider failed to ensure: *One of one sampled resident (31) had received diabetic fingernail care to maintain a dignified appearance. *One of one sampled resident (8) was dressed in a dignified manner. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 11/5/24 at 9:26 a.m. with resident 31 while she rested in her bed revealed: *She was chewing and sucking on her left index and middle finger and stated she was hungry. *Inspection of both hands revealed she had long, uneven, fingernails that extended approximately one-fourth of an inch beyond her finger pads. -There was a dark brown build-up of an unknown substance caked under each fingernail that extended outwards from the edge of each finger pad to the middle of each fingernail. *An odor of feces was detected at her bedside. Observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 9:40 a.m. with the assistant director of nursing (ADON) C and contracted hospice registered nurse (RN) L during resident 31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and job description review, the provider failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for the use of: *TED Hose (thromboembolic deterrent compression stockings used by non-ambulatory residents) by one of one sampled resident (39). *Redi-Wraps (adjustable compression wrap) by one of one sampled resident (8). *Gradual compression stockings (compression stockings that are tightest around the ankle and gradually loosen up the leg) by one of one sampled resident (65). Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 2:26 p.m. with resident 39 in her room revealed: *She was sitting in her recliner with the leg rests elevated. -On the wall behind her recliner was a sign that read Ted Hose on in AM and off in PM. *The resident was wearing regular socks on her feet. -She had no TED Hose that fit her and had not worn TED Hose since the summer. Observations on 11/5/24 at 9:11 a.m. and again on 11/6/24 at 9:41 a.m. of resident 39 in her room revealed she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the South Dakota Board of Nursing website, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure professional standards of care were followed for: *Medication administration practices by one of one licensed practical nurse (LPN) (H) for three of three observed residents (2, 7, 17, and 22). *Ensuring physician's orders for Tylenol were written for two-325 miligram (mg) tablets for three of three sampled residents (8, 33, and 65) to eliminate the need for a dose calculation by one of one unlicensed medication aide (UMA) (I). *Insulin administration by one of one LPN (F) for one of one sampled resident (25). *deceased note was documented in the medical record of one of one sample resident (71). *A follow-up appintment was made for one of one sampled resident (49) to receive a new lower partial denture. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:20 a.m. with LPN H in the 300 hallway revealed: *In one of her opened medication (med) cart drawers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review the provider failed to assess, document and provide interventions per their policy for one of one sampled resident (49) who had suicidal ideations. 1. Observation and interview on 10/24/23 at 2:42 p.m. with resident 49 revealed: *His door was closed. *CNA J knocked on resident 49's door. -Resident 49 opened the door and came into the hallway. *Resident 49 was smiling and answered basic questions before returning to his room. Interview on 10/24/23 at 2:50 p.m. with CNA J revealed resident 49 often barricaded his door from the inside. Review of resident 49's medical record revealed: *He was admitted on [DATE]. *His diagnoses included: -Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. -Alcohol-induced persisting dementia. -Alzheimer's Disease. -Anxiety. -Obstructive sleep apnea. -Hearing loss. *His 9/22/23 Brief Interview of Mental Status score was 5, indicating he had severe cognitive impairment. *A 9/22/23 nurse's progress note revealed: -His speech was clear. -He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$24,751 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $13,343 — penalty dated 2025-08-13
- $11,408 — penalty dated 2023-10-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 88 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 88; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOROS GENERATION TRUST U/A/D 1/3/12 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 43% | since 07/01/2019 |
| GPN FAMILY TRUST U/A/D 4/28/08 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 43% | since 07/01/2019 |
| OAKWAY OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 07/01/2019 |
| SAINT CLOUD SD PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2019 |
| TRUIST BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| RAJCHENBACH, CHAIM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2019 |
| SHABAT, MENACHEM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2019 |
| ALTENA, ASHALEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/08/2023 |
| PTACEK, TRAVIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| LEGACY HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2019 |
| RSM US LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $876K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in SD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the South Dakota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 435060. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.