Hallmark Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 40.6 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with education regarding the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #8, #18, #33, #38) . Additionally, the facility failed to offer alternative treatment options prior to the administration of the medications. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include:1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident #8 dated 7/30/25 documented diagnoses that included: Non Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and depression. The MDS recorded an admission date to the facility of 7/23/25. The resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated July of 2025 reflected the resident had orders for Escitalopram, an antidepressant medication, start date 7/24/25; Buspirone, an antianxiety medication, start date 7/24/25 and Quetiapine, an antipsychotic medication, start date of 7/23/25. A clinical record review of the Resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) failed to reveal consent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User Manual, and staff interview the facility failed to accurately code resident falls with major injury, medications, smoking, and restraints on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for 5 of 15 reviewed (Resident #8, #13, #18, #28 and #31). The facility identified a census of 42 residents. Findings include:1.Resident #13's Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) Census showed he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A 2/12/26 Hospital Discharge Summary documented Resident #13 with a diagnosis of a stroke and to discharge on aspirin (antiplatelet medication) 81 Milligrams (MG) chewable tablet daily and clopidogrel (antiplatelet medication) 75 MG, take 1 tablet daily. A 2/16/26 Provider Encounter Visit Progress Note documented Resident #13 on dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention. Resident #13's 2/19/26 MDS Assessment showed a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of records, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide education and obtain informed consent for 4 of 4 residents regarding eligibility for influenza vaccination (Resident #7, #12, #18, and #24) and 3 of 3 residents for pneumococcal vaccination (Resident #7, #18, and #24). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include:Review of the Census List on 4/9/26 for Resident #7 documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was a current resident. A review of her Electronic Health Record (EHR) on 4/9/26 revealed she had not received her influenza or pneumococcal vaccinations.Review of the Census List on 4/9/26 for Resident #12 documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was a current resident. A review of his EHR on 4/9/26 revealed he had not received the influenza vaccination.Review of the Census List on 4/9/26 for Resident #18 documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was a current resident. A review of her EHR on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and instructions of CMS form 10123-NOMNC, and 10055-SNF ABN, the facility failed to ensure an accurate and timely Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was provided and failed to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification (Resident #50). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include: Record review of Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and the Census line of the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident received Medicare-covered services from 2/10/26 through 3/3/26. On 3/4/26, the resident's payor source transitioned to private pay until discharge on [DATE]. A review of the facility-provided Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) form for Resident #50, signed by the resident's spouse/representative on 2/18/26, documented that Medicare coverage would end on 2/24/26. On 4/7/26, the facility noted on the SNF…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of the information sent to the hospital to ensure that continuity of care and resident needs were maintained during the transfer process for 4 of 4 hospitalizations reviewed (Residents #2 and #6). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include: 1.The Census List for Resident #2 documented a hospital transfer from 1/19/26 to 1/23/26, and a second transfer from 3/25/26 to 4/2/26.A review of Resident #2's Progress Notes and Assessments revealed a lack of documentation regarding the information sent to the hospital for the 1/19/26 and 3/25/26 hospitalizations2. The Census List for Resident #6 documented hospital transfers from 2/18/26 to 2/27/26 and from 3/29/26 to 4/3/26.A review of Resident #6's Progress Notes and Assessments revealed a lack of documentation regarding the information sent to the hospital for the 2/18/26 and 3/29/26 hospitalizationsDuring an interview on 4/8/26 at 3:17 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's mental health diagnosis and medications were accurately reported to the designated state agency for 1 of 3 residents diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (Resident #38) and failed to implement PASRR level II recommendations into the care plan for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #6 and #18). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include:The Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) Census documented Resident #38 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Facsimile (fax) Transmission dated 9/3/25 from a local hospital detailed a 9/2/25 PASRR (a federally mandated process for evaluating individuals with serious mental illness (SMI), intellectual disabilities (ID), or related conditions (RC) prior to admission into a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to ensure appropriate placement, and necessary services) which determined Resident #38…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement interventions into the care plans for 2 of 2 residents following their return from hospitalizations (Residents #2 and #6). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include:1.The Census List for Resident #2 documented hospitalization from 1/19/26 to 1/23/26, and a second hospitalization from 3/25/26 to 4/2/26.Review of Resident #2's Progress Note by his Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) revealed he was seen on 1/26/26 at the facility for an acute follow-up due to a recent hospitalization from 1/19/26 to 1/23/26. During his hospital stay, he was diagnosed with acute respiratory failure with hypoxia due to Influenza A and was also treated for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI).Review of Resident #2's Progress Note by his ARNP revealed he was seen on 4/6/26 at the facility for an acute follow up due to a recent hospitalization that he returned from on 4/2/26. During his hospital stay, he was treated for kidney stones and treated for a UTI. He returned to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, document review and staff interview the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain daily weights for 1 of 1 resident sampled on daily weights (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include:The Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR), last order review 2/09/26 documented a physician order for a daily weight in the morning related to heart failure, start date 11/25/25.The Risk for Altered Cardiovascular Functioning related to Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 4 Care Plan dated 10/7/25 directed to monitor weights as ordered. A 4/07/26 review of the 2026 Electronic Treatment Administration Records (ETARs) and the Vital Sign Weight Records revealed the following missing daily weights:a. January 1, 3, 4, 13, 18, 20, 29 and 31b. February 12, 19, and 21c. March 1, 3, 5, 17, 19, and 22d. April 4On 4/08/26 at 10:23 AM, Staff A, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) reported generally the certified nursing assistants (CNAs) got the daily weights first thing in the morning and then gave the weights to the nurses. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, CMS 2567 review, and QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) Plan review, the facility failed to implement effective quality assurance processes to address Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) deficiencies, resulting in F644 being cited in 2025 as well as the current survey. The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include:A review of the facility CASPER report revealed the facility cited for F644 Coordination of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) (a federally mandated process for evaluating individuals with serious mental illness (SMI), intellectual disabilities (ID), or related conditions (RC) prior to admission into a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to ensure appropriate placement, and necessary services) and Assessments March 2025.The facility CMS 2567 Plan Of Correction (POC) with a compliance date of 4/19/25 detailed the Administrative Nurses and Social Service Designee would continue to review the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0868 — isolated
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist attended the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) quarterly meetings. The facility identified a census of 42 residents.Findings include:A 4/07/26 review of the Quality Assurance (QA) Sign-in (Attendance) Sheets for 10/24/25 and 1/21/26 lacked documentation the facility Infection Preventionist attended the quarterly QA meetings.On 4/08/26 at 3:00 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) reported the Infection Preventionist had still been an employee of the facility at that time and may have worked the floor so she was unable to attend the QA meetings.On 4/09/26 at 8:35 AM the Administrator reviewed all the QA Sign-In Sheets and verified the Infection Preventionist was not in attendance at the meetings. She reviewed the QAPI meeting notes for 10/24/25 and 1/21/26 to find there wasn't significant information regarding a quarterly review of the infection control program/tracking. The Administrator voiced if the Infection Preventionist had worked the floor, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 74 rows in the source record cover these 44 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $632K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA