Avantara Libertyville
1500 South Milwaukee Avenue, Libertyville, IL 60048 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (847) 816-3200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,130 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-22)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 99.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.0% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.3% | 18.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.7% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.1% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.6% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.8% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 345 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 147 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 71% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.4%CMS range 52.5–63.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 8.3–13.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 70.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 4.2–8.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 108.5 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.99 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a resident with the Physician prescribed diet, failed to have a policy in place regarding changes in dietary orders, and failed to implement a physician diet order change. This failure resulted in R1 choking on her food and expiring at the hospital. This applied to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for diets in the sample of three.The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/17/26 when R1 received physician orders for a downgrade in diet to pureed and the next morning was served a mechanical soft diet rather than the Physician prescribed puree diet. R1 choked and expired at the hospital. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 5/22/26 at 9:58 AM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected, on 5/18/26, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. This past noncompliance occurred from 5/17/2026 to 5/18/2026.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide bed mobility in a safe manner for 1of 7 residents (R1) reviewed for safety/falls in the sample of 7. This failure resulted in R1 falling from R1's bed and sustaining left and right femur fractures requiring hospitalization.Findings include:R1's Care Plan initiated 04/10/2024 shows, R1 is diagnosed with morbid obesity and generalized osteoarthritis. R1 has an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to general weakness, immobility, and decreased activity endurance.R1 Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] shows, R1 is dependent on staff to roll left and right. R1's Progress Notes dated 8/12/2025 at 10:36PM, shows, Radiology Note, Results: FRACTURE OF THE PROXIMAL LEFT FEMUR.R1's Progress Notes dated 8/12/2025 at 11:50PM, resident transported to emergency room per non-emergency ambulance via stretcher.R1's Final Incident report of 08/12/2025 at 11:00AM, shows, R1 needs the assistance of staff for bed mobility . R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician on a resident experiencing a change in condition for 1 of 7 residents (R1) reviewed for dependent care in the sample of 7. Findings include:R1's Final Incident report of 08/12/2025 at 11:00AM, shows, R1 needs the assistance of staff for bed mobility . R1 requested assistance from staff to start her day. As V4 CNA assisted R1 to roll to her side R1's leg fell off the bed. V4 CNA attempted to lift R1's legs back on to the bed, due to R1's large size and V4's small size, R1 and V4 CNA fell approximately 4 feet from the bed to the floor. R1's legs crossed during the fall. Due to R1's morbid obesity, osteoarthritis, and the impact pressure of the fall, R1 sustained a left and a right femur fracture.R1's Vital Sign record dated 08/12/2025 at 5:00PM, shows, Pain at 12:35PM, 2/10, Pain at 5:00PM, 8/10.R1's Progress Note dated 8/12/2025 at 5:46PM, shows, patient resting in bed during X-ray wait time. Continues to report left leg pain rated 8/10 on pain scale.R1's Progress Note dated 8/12/2025 at 10:21PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-14 · tag F0729 — widespreadVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing assistants were certified after completing the training program. This applies to all 114 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility Data Sheet dated 01/14/25 shows 114 residents residing in the facility. On 01/14/25 at 10:43 AM, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant-in training) was observed working on the 2nd floor. She was leaving a resident's room. Her name tag stated CNA. V7 said she's been working at the facility for about 1.5 years and floats throughout the facility. She said she went to school for her CNA training and she's is a CNA. She said she completed the training a 2nd time about three months ago. V7 said she has her own resident assignment. On 01/14/25 at 11:52 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said we do not employ staff that are not licensed, there is window once a CNA has completed the training and have 120 days to take their test and pass. If they don't, they are removed from the schedule. V2 said there is one male staff who has completed the training and is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect all 122 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The CMS 671 form, dated 9/23/24, list the resident census as 122. On 9/23/2024 at 10:10AM, small white circular containers were seen unlabeled in the freezer. Frozen pizza was observed in the corner of the freezer in an open box, uncovered, and open to air. On 9/24/2024 at 10:55AM, V6, Cook, was observed using a spatula to scoop taco meat into the blender to puree. V6 set the spatula down in a strainer pan over the sink that was visibly soiled with yellow, white, and brown food debris. V6 then removed the spatula in the strainer and used it to scoop rice out of a pan into the blender. On 9/23/2024 at 11:40AM, V7, Dietary Director, said, Foods should be prepared and labeled with the date. This way staff know when it was made and when to toss it out. Foods should be covered in the freezer. On 9/24/2024 at 12:29PM, V7 said a spatula that has touched a dirty surface…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain weights as ordered for residents with congestive heart failure (CHF) for 4 of 24 residents (R38, R66, R244, and R11) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 24. The findings include: 1. R38's Face Sheet showed R38 had the diagnosis of CHF. R38's Order Summary Report showed an order for weekly weights to be done on Friday mornings, starting on 8/9/24 R38's Weights and Vitals Summary showed there were no weekly weights for the week of 8/9/24, 8/23/24, 8/30/24, and 9/20/24. R38's Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record did not have any recorded weights. On 09/24/24 at 12:07 PM, R38 said she gets weighed once every few weeks. 2. R66's Face Sheet showed R66 had the diagnosis of CHF. R66's Orders showed an order for daily weights. R66's Weight and Vitals Summary and Treatment Administration Record for 9/1/24-9/23/24 showed missing daily weights for 9/4/24, 9/6/24, 9/7/24, 9/9/24, 9/10/24, 9/15/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. R113's careplan, dated 6/1/24, shows, (R113) is on EBP due to presence of indwelling catheter with interventions that include: ensure that gown and gloves are used during high-contact resident care activities like .changing briefs, or assisting in toileting, .device care-urinary catheter. R113's door had a sign posted that show, STOP, Enhance Barrier Precaution (EBP) . Everyone must: .Wear gloves and gown for the following High Contact Resident Care Activities: Changing brief, device care use .urinary catheter. On 9/23/24 at 10:05 AM, V14 (CNA) entered R113's room with just gloves on, and emptied R113's catheter bag. Then V14 proceeded to provide incontinence care and catheter care to R113, again just wearing gloves. When it was time to transfer R113 to his wheelchair, V15 (CNA Supervisor), wearing gloves and gown, handed a gown to V14. V14 stated, What is this for? I thought (R113) was just an a regular isolation. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to wear PPE (Personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were in place for 2 of 5 residents (R106 and R30) reviewed for pressure injury in the sample 24. The findings include: 1. On 09/23/24 at 09:35 AM, R106 was in bed. Hanging on the foot board of the bed was an air mattress pump. The orange standby light was lit up on the air mattress pump. The light next to On was not lit up. R106's Care Plan showed she was at risk for developing a pressure injury. Listed under interventions was to check air mattress for proper functioning. 2. On 09/23/24 at 10:25 AM, R30 was in bed. Hanging on the foot of the bed was an air mattress pump. The lights on the pump were not lit up. The air mattress pump's power cord was not plugged into an outlet. R30's care plan showed R30 had cerebral palsy, paraplegia, limited mobility, and was at risk for skin alterations. Listed under interventions was to check air mattress for proper functioning. On 09/24/24 at 11:04 AM, V12 (Wound Care Nurse) said R106 and R30 are at risk for pressure injuries. V12 said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide catheter care to prevent urinary tract infection to 1 of 6 residents (R113) reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 24. The findings include: On 9/23/24 at 10:05 AM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) provided catheter care to R113. V14 (CNA) removed R113's incontinent pad, then took disposable wipes and wiped R113's perineal area, then applied a new incontinent brief. V14 did not provide any cleansing to R113's catheter tubing, and did not provide any cleansing to R113's frontal area/genitals area. On 9/24/24 at 9:40 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said staff should provide thorough incontinence care, including the catheter tubing when providing pericare to prevent infection. R113 has history of UTIs (urinary tract infections). The facility policy entitled Urinary Catheter. 16. For male residents Use wash cloth with warm waster and soap to cleanse around the meatus .17. Use clean washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized activities for a resident with dementia for 1 of 3 residents (R76) reviewed for dementia care in the sample of 24. The findings include: R76's facility assessment, dated 7/19/24, show R76 is severely cognitively impaired. R76's electronic medical record shows R76 has diagnosis of dementia. R76's care plan, dated 2/18/24, shows, (R76) demonstrate movement behavior of wandering, pacing or roaming. Intervention include: remain safely engaged in activity focused care, a meaningful intervention or social interaction. Engage (R76) with walking movement/keeping busy/exercise program. On 9/23/24 during the initial tour on 2nd floor, R76 was noted to be walking and pacing aimlessly from her room towards the nurses station, then by the elevator, then back to the nurses station then hallways. R76 was being repeatedly told to go back to her room. There was no activity being provided to R76. On 9/23/24 at 10 AM, R76 was coming out form her room. V15 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA Supervisor) went…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed as ordered for a resident with pressure injuries for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure in the sample of 3. The findings include: R2's Physician Orders (POS), dated 12/1/23, shows sacrum wound: cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply silver gel, cover with bordered foam dressing every day shift and as needed. The same POS shows an order dated 12/14/23 for sacrum wound: cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply santyl ointment to wound bed, cover wound bed with calcium alginate, cover with bordered foam dressing every day shift and as needed. R2's Wound Nurse Practitioner Noted, dated 12/11/23, shows sacrum pressure treatment recommendations: 1. cleanse with normal saline 2. apply santyl and calcium alginate to base of the wound. 3. secure with bordered foam. 4. change daily and as needed. R2' Progress Note, dated 12/14/23, at 8:15 AM, shows patient urinary catheter was removed in the morning at 5:30 AM because it was leaking and tried to reinsert it, but it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. This has the potential to affect all 100 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The Facility Data Sheet dated 11/6/23 shows an in-house census of 100. On 11/6/23 at 12:02PM, V11, Cook, was observed moving his glasses around on the countertop, cleaning up scraps of paper on the counter, and putting them in the trash while plating residents' food for lunch. V11 did not change his gloves or wash his hands between touching his glasses and scraps of paper, before returning to plating food. On 11/6/23 at 12:02PM, V12, Dietary Aide, was observed putting silverware on trays for residents. V12 dropped a fork on the ground. V12 picked up the fork and placed it back on top of the silverware cart near the clean silverware and creamer packets. V12 did not wash his hands after picking up the fork off of the ground before returning to placing silverware on residents trays. On 11/6/23 at 12:57PM, V10, Food Service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 11 citations
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and environment were clean and home like for 6 of 23 residents (R69, R54, R84, R16, R59 and R17) reviewed for homelike environment in the sample of 23. The findings include: On 11/6/23 at 9:32 AM, R84's room was noted to have a strong foul smelling odor. On the floor and in his bed were multiple Styrofoam cups, straws, and wrappers. His bedside table base had a thick substance caked onto it with hair stuck to it. The floor was very dirty with pieces of dried food and wrappers on it. On 11/7/23 at 8:59 AM, R84's room was in the same condition a foul odor, dirty floor and sticky bedside table and his bottom sheet was also noted to be stained with what appeared to be spilled liquid. On 11/6/23 at 10:00AM and 11/7/23 at 9:05AM, the floor of R16's and R59's room was covered with trash, used tissues, used food containers, food wrappers, a clean brief, plastic wrappers and an empty box of gloves. On 11/7/23 at 9:05AM, R16 stated she thought housekeeping had been in already. On 11/6/23 the floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide R79 with a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) thirty days after admission for one of seven residents (R79) reviewed for Preadmission Screening for individuals with a mental disorder in the sample of twenty. The findings include: R79's admission Record on 11/08/23 at 1:01PM, shows R79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R79's Physician's Orders on 11/08/23 at 1:02PM, shows, Diagnoses: schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Sertraline hydrochloride for depression related to schizoaffective disorder. R79's PASRR level One performed 07/07/2023 shows, Exempted Hospital Discharge, physician documented that he requires 30 days or less of nursing facility care. Mental Health Medications: olanzapine 15 milligrams daily, Diagnosis: schizoaffective disorder. Exempt Hospital Discharge 30-day approval- A 30 day or less stay in the nursing facility is authorized. Re-screening must occur by or before the 30th day if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing interventions were in place for a resident which applies to 1 of 8 residents (R78) reviewed for pressure wounds in a sample of 23. The findings include: R78's Facility Assessment, dated 10/18/23, showed R78 is a [AGE] year old female, whom is dependent on staff for mobility care concerns, and at risk for developing pressure injuries. R78's Braden Assessment, dated 10/24/23, showed R78 to be at high risk for developing pressure injuries. On 11/6/23 at 9:55 AM, R78 was in bed watching television. R78's heels were resting on the mattress with her feet pressed against the footboard. R78 had no offloading devices in place (pillows or boots), and the pump to R78's air mattress was in standby mode. On 11/7/23 at 9:30 AM, V8, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated, When you push the standby button turns the pump on/off without turning the power off. When the yellow light is on the air pump is not on. The pump should be on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to standards of practice for 1 of 23 residents (R84) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 23. The findings include: On 11/6/23 at 9:32 AM, R84's over bed table was next to his bedside. On the over bed table was a white container that was open with a white pill inside of it. There was also an inhaler sitting on the bedside table. R84 said he wasn't sure what the pill was, but someone left the medications in his room for him to take, and he dropped the white pill, so he left it. On 11/7/23 at 8:59 AM, the medication and inhaler were still present on R84's over bed table. V4 (Registered Nurse/RN) went into the room with the surveyor and asked R84 about the medications. R84 said the medications were in the room for about 2 weeks. On 11/7/23 at 9:00 AM, V4 said someone should have supervised R84 take the medications, as he is not able to self-administer them without an assessment and a physician order. V4 looked up the white pill inside R84's container and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to handle dishes in sanitary manner and failed to ensure dry goods were stored 6 inches off the floor. This applies to all residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The Facility Resident Census and Condition Report, dated 10/25/22, shows there are 80 residents residing in the facility. 1, On 10/24/22 at 9:56 AM, V7 and V8 (both Dietary Aides) were in the kitchen dirty dishes area. V8 removed the soiled dishes from the food cart, and was removing food debris from the breakfast plates. V7 was at the sink prewashing the dirty plates. V7 loaded the soiled dishes to the dish machine. V7 went to the clean area and pulled the clean dishes then put them away. V7 went back to the dirty dishes area and loaded the soiled dishes to the dish machine again. V7 went to the clean area, removed the clean dishes and put them away. V7 was all over the dishwashing area wearing the same soiled gloves and V7 did not wash his hands touching dirty dishes, touching clean dishes, then touching dirty dishes, then back to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner for 1 of 18 residents (R235) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 18. The findings include: R235's admission Evaluation, dated October 21, 2022, showed R235 was cognitively intact and continent of bowel/bladder. On October 24, 2022 at 10:30 AM, R235 was seated in bed with a commode placed directly next to her bed. R235 stated, Prior to having surgery and coming here, I lived with my sister. I used the bathroom there when I had to go. Last night (10/23/22), the male CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) just told me to go (urinate) in my diaper because he was the only CNA. During the day, the staff always get me up to the commode. He (male CNA) made me feel terrible. I want to use the toilet like I do at home. I am not a child that wears a diaper. On October 25, 2022 at 8:55 AM, V11, CNA, stated he provided cares to R235 during the night shift on October 23, 2022. V11 stated, It was my first time working with (R235). I really didn't know her. I know she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with privacy during incontinence care for one of 18 residents (R68) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 10/24/22 at 11:33 AM, V12, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), was providing incontinence care to R68. R68's roommate was lying in her bed. R68's privacy curtain was not closed, and R68's private body parts were exposed. On 10/25/22 at 12:37 PM, V18, CNA, said the privacy curtain should be pulled so that the resident has privacy during incontinence care. The State of Illinois Residents' Rights for People in Long-term Care Facilities, dated 3/17, shows, Your medical and personal care are private.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with leg edema had compression wraps on for 1 of 18 residents (R64) reviewed for edema in the sample of 18. The findings include: A facility assessment done on 9/15/22 showed R64 was cognitively intact. On 10/24/22 at 11:23 AM, R64 was in his bed. R64's legs were swollen. There were no compression wraps on R64's legs. R64 said he was to have compression wraps on his legs to help the edema. R64 added sometimes staff will put the wraps on, and sometimes they will not. R64's Order Summary Report showed an order for compression wraps to be on for 23 hours a day. R64's October Treatment Administration Record for the compression wraps was blank for 10/4/22, 10/18/22, 10/22/22, and 10/23/22 (4 days). On 10/26/22 at 10:21 AM, V14 (Registered Nurse) said when a task/treatment is completed, it should be documented, that way there is proof the task/treatment was done.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment during incontinence care/bed mobility to prevent a fall, and failed to ensure a resident with dysphasia (difficult with swallowing) was supervised while drinking, for 2 of 18 residents (R17 and R187) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. A facility assessment done on 8/3/22 showed R17 was cognitively intact. The same assessment showed R17 needed extensive assistance of two people with bed mobility and toileting. R17's Care Plan showed R17 had the diagnosis of quadriplegia and reduced mobility. R17's activities of daily living self care deficit care plan listed under interventions that R17, Usually needed one person assistance with bed mobility. R17's Physical Therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], showed for bed mobility R17 required substantial/maximal assistance. On 10/24/22 at 11:45 AM, R17 said on 10/4/22 and 10/19/22, she fell out of bed while staff were providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medications were administered by a nurse. The facility failed to ensure physician ordered medications were administered to a resident. The failures apply to 3 of 18 residents (R84, R236, R186) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R84's physician order, dated October 19, 2022, showed, Moxifloxacin HCL 0.5% (antibiotic eye drops). Instill 1 drop in right eye one time a day for pink eye for 5 days. On October 24, 2022 at 11:10 AM, R84 was seated in bed. On the nightstand, directly next to R84's bed, was an opened bottle of Moxifloxacin (antibiotic eye drops) in a plastic bag. When R84 was asked about the bottle, R84 stated, I guess those are my eye drops. On October 24, 2022 at 11:15 AM, V5, Registered Nurse, stated, Medications are to be administered by the nurse. Medications are not to be left at residents' bedside unless they have been screened and approved to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure visitors wore PPE (personal protective equipment) in the room of a COVID-19 positive resident. The facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination. These failures apply to 3 of 18 residents (R237, R68, R32) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R237's COVID-19 laboratory result, dated October 23, 2022, showed R237 tested positive for COVID-19. R237's physician order, dated October 23, 2022, showed, Airborne/droplet isolation, COVID positive 10/23/22. On October 24, 2022 at 11:30 AM, R237 was in bed. R237 wore no surgical mask. The door to R237's room was open. A contact/droplet isolation sign hung on R237's door. A plastic container of PPE (gowns, masks, gloves, face shields) was noted in the hallway, directly next to R237's room. V9 (Family of R237) was seated on R237's bed, directly next to R237. V9 wore no isolation gown, mask, gloves, or face shield. V10 (Family of R237) was seated in a chair directly next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,130 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $26,130 — penalty dated 2026-05-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 88 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 88; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOROS GENERATION TRUST U/A/D 1/3/12 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 26% | since 02/01/2023 |
| GPN FAMILY TRUST U/A/D 4/28/08 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 60% | since 02/01/2023 |
| OAKWAY OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 02/01/2023 |
| SKINNER, KARIL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| SHABAT, MENACHEM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| LEGACY HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $64K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145593. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.