No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Valley Vue Care Center

108 Second Ave, Armstrong, IA 50514 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 40 certified beds · (712) 864-3567 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (712) 864-3567 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
412 Sixth Street · (712) 864-3360 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
106 W Ramsey St · (515) 885-0500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
206 4th Ave S · (712) 868-3680 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5118 Tuttle Lake Rd · (712) 337-3211 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.1%17.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.5%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.8%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.8%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.8%16.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.7%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.1%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table27.7%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.0%73.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%20.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.1%13.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.901.491.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.932.081.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.5%CMS range 35.1–65.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.0–17.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.691.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.74
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
35.0%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 34.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, manufacturer's guidelines and staff interview, the facility failed to assure residents insulin pen was primed prior to insulin administration preventing a significant medication error for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Findings include:During an ongoing observation on 3/11/2026 starting at 11:04 a.m., of Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) preparing to check Resident #12's blood sugar prior to meal and administer insulin. Staff A checked the insulin orders and did not perform hand hygiene prior to applying gloves. Staff A removed the insulin pen from the medication cart and an insulin pen needle. Staff A turned the dial to 2 units without the insulin pen needle on it and pushed the trigger. Staff A with the soiled gloves still on applied the insulin pen needle and turned the dial to 10 units. Staff A was unsure of which side she was to administer the insulin and left the room with the soiled gloves on. Staff A reentered the room with gloves on and moved the shirt up, and pulled the edge of the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, infection control policy and staff interview, the facility failed perform proper hand hygiene and adhere to infection control guidelines during medication pass for 1 of 4 residents observed (Resident #12) The facility reported a total census of 32 residents.Findings include: During an ongoing observation on 3/11/2026 starting at 11:04 a.m., of Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) preparing to check Resident #12's blood sugar prior to meal. Staff A removed items needed for blood sugar check. Staff A without performing hand hygiene applied gloves. With gloves on locked the medication cart, knocked on the residents door, opened the door to the residents room, picked up the barrier and placed the barrier onto the bed and placed supplies on the barrier. Staff A with soiled gloves opened an alcohol swab and cleaned the area on the resident's finger, with soiled gloves still on and used the glucose monitor to check the resident's blood sugar. With the soiled gloves on Staff A cleaned up her supplies and barrier and removed one glove. Staff did not perform hand hygiene.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to complete and document appropriate assessments and interventions for the necessary care and services, to maintain the residents' highest practical physical well-being for 2 of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #8 and #17). The facility failed to obtain and complete a treatment order for Resident #8's open area to the right buttocks. The facility also failed to complete neurological assessments after an unwitnessed fall and failed to document urinary assessment after suspecting a urinary tract infection after the fall for Resident #17. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS identified Resident #8 required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS documented Resident #8 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #12 and #31). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #12 was dependent on staff with transfer to the toilet and toileting hygiene. The MDS indicated that Resident #12 has an indwelling catheter. Resident #12's MDS included diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), benign prostatic hyperplasia, neurogenic bladder (bladder dysfunction caused by nervous system conditions) and retention of urine. The Care Plan with target date of 4/8/25 identified Resident #12 had an indwelling catheter due to a neurogenic bladder. The Care Plan directed staff to ensure a dignity bag remained in place, monitor tubing for kinks/leaks and ensure tubing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to conduct appropriate assessments, interventions and timely Physician notifications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #17) for weight loss. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS identified Resident #17 required set up or clean up assistance with eating. The MDS documented Resident #17 did not have a 5% weight loss in the last month or 10 % weight loss in the last 6 months. Resident #17's MDS included diagnoses of cancer, anemia, heart failure, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with hemiplegia affecting the left side. The Care Plan with target date 4/2/25 revealed Resident #17 had a potential for altered nutritional status related to stroke, diagnosis of heart failure, anemia and history of urinary tract infection.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed ensure a resident had a current order for administration of as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #28). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #18 scored 7 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, stroke, depression, restlessness and agitation. The Care Plan with a goal target date of 3/26/25 identified Resident #18 utilized a psychotropic medication related to Alzheimer's disease, depression, and agitation/anxiety (end of life). Interventions included administering medications as ordered. Hospice orders dated 9/26/24 included Lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet, 1/2 tab every 4 hours PRN for agitation/anxiety. A Pharmacy Review-General Recommendation documented the need for follow up with the provider as the order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0811 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to utilize a Paid Nutritional Assistant (PNA) appropriately for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #14). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS identified Resident #14 required partial/moderate assistance with eating. The MDS documented Resident #14 has had weight loss and was on a mechanically altered diet. The Care Plan with a target date 3/5/25 revealed Resident #14 had the potential risk for altered nutritional status related to increased weakness and comfort care. The Care Plan directed staff to assess for signs and symptoms of aspiration or any difficulty swallowing. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #14 had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A Physician Order dated 12/7/22 directed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a pneumococcal vaccine for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #28). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #28 had short term memory problems and modified independence with cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident had diagnoses including down syndrome and cognitive communication deficit. The MDS indicated the resident's pneumococcal vaccine was not up to date, and not offered. An admission Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination Information form showed Resident #28's responsible party signed the resident would like to receive the pneumonia vaccine, dated 8/19/24. The clinical record lacked documentation the resident had received the pneumonia vaccine or why she had not. On 2/13/25 at 8:42 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) brought a Resident Vaccine Audit and wrote in the date started 12/1/24. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assure each resident received care in a manner that promoted enhancement of their quality of life for 3 of 3 residents reviewed, (Resident #82, #21 and #12). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #82 scored 13 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, ambulation, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing. The resident had diagnoses including arthritis, osteoporosis, muscle weakness and chronic kidney disease. The Care Plan with a goal target date of 12/5/23 identified the resident's daily routine was important to her. She had certain preferences she would like to maintain while she stayed in the facility. She liked to choose how she spent the day, how her furniture was arranged, and specific morning, bedtime…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record and chart review the facility failed to accurately document a resident's specific need for 2 of 15 residents reviewed (Resident #7 and Resident #29). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented diagnosis of hypertension, Parkinson ' s disease, depression, and anxiety. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed the facility failed to code a wander/elopement alarm on the MDS in section P for Restraints and Alarms. Review of the Physician Orders revealed the wander guard was placed on Resident #7 on 9/14/23. Observation on 2/26/24 revealed Resident #7 had a wander guard bracelet on the ankle. 2. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #29 documented diagnosis of weakness, covid-19, hypokalemia and hypoxemia. The MDS showed a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to answer call lights in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #82) and multiple call light times greater than 15 minutes in the 7 day look back period. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #82 scored 13 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, ambulation, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing. The resident had diagnoses including arthritis, osteoporosis, muscle weakness and chronic kidney disease. The Care Plan with a goal target of 12/5/23 identified the resident needed assistance with her activities of daily living related to advanced age and arthritis. The interventions included the resident was alert and oriented, able to communicate needs and use the call light.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 52.5+2.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 88 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avantara ArrowheadRapid City, SD 1 of 5Avantara Evergreen ParkEvergreen Park, IL 1 of 5Avantara MilbankMilbank, SD 1 of 5Avantara Saint CloudRapid City, SD 1 of 5Avantara WatertownWatertown, SD 1 of 5Emmetsburg Care CenterEmmetsburg, IA 1 of 5Grove Of Elmhurst, TheElmhurst, IL 1 of 5Harmony Cedar RapidsCedar Rapids, IA 1 of 5Harmony House Health Care CenterWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Harmony MarshalltownMarshalltown, IA 1 of 5Harmony WaterlooWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Harmony West Des MoinesWest Des Moines, IA 1 of 5Nexus at BerwynBerwyn, IL 1 of 5Northgate Care CenterWaukon, IA 1 of 5Park View Rehabilitation CenterSac City, IA 1 of 5Southfield Wellness CommunityWebster City, IA 1 of 5Warren Barr South LoopChicago, IL 2 of 5Avantara GrotonGroton, SD 2 of 5Avantara HuronHuron, SD 2 of 5Avantara Lincoln ParkChicago, IL 2 of 5Avantara Mountain ViewRapid City, SD 2 of 5Avantara Palos HeightsPalos Heights, IL 2 of 5Avantara PierrePierre, SD 2 of 5Avantara RedfieldRedfield, SD 2 of 5Bella Terra BloomingdaleBloomingdale, IL 2 of 5Bella Terra Morton GroveMorton Grove, IL 2 of 5Carlton At The Lake, TheChicago, IL 2 of 5Chalet Living & RehabChicago, IL 2 of 5Colonial Manor of ElmaElma, IA 2 of 5Hallmark Care CenterMount Vernon, IA 2 of 5Harmony DavenportDavenport, IA 2 of 5Harmony DubuqueDubuque, IA 2 of 5Harmony PalosPalos Heights, IL 2 of 5Harmony Utica RidgeDavenport, IA 2 of 5Heritage Care And Rehabilitation CenterMason City, IA 2 of 5Manor House Care CenterSigourney, IA 2 of 5Peterson Park Health Care CtrChicago, IL 3 of 5Avantara LibertyvilleLibertyville, IL 3 of 5Avantara NorthRapid City, SD 3 of 5Bloomfield Care CenterBloomfield, IA

Showing 40 of 88; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DOROS GENERATION TRUST U/A/D 1/3/12OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/15/2024
OAKWAY OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/15/2024
SHABAT, MENACHEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
LEGACY HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
BEASLEY, KARLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
BEHOUNEK, LINSEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
BORCHERDING, JENNYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
BURKEN, SHERIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
DAVIS, TAYLORIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
FRIEDENBERG, LAURAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
HEDBERG, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
HENNAGER, CHRISTINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
HEYING, LARINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
HOUSTON, MINDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
JAEGER, KRYSTLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
KNUTSON, MICHELEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
LARSON, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
MCCLURE, DOROTHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
OTTERBECK, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
RAJCHENBACH, CHAIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
RUNKSMEIER, DAWNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
SCOTT, KATHLEENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
SEU, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
SHEAR, KILEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
SLAMA, TIMOTHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
STAUDT, SANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
VAN VEGHEL, ELIZABETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
WIERSCHEM, BOBBIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
WOOD, ROSEMARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
WRIGHT, AMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
ARMSTRONG IA PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
CASCADE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
CASCADE CAPITAL PARTNERS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
CCG GORGONA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
GORGONA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
GORGONA PROPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
GORGONA SUB HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
MN8 RH HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 67 rows in the source record cover these 38 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$471K
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 47%Medicare 7%Other / private 46%

This home reported $471K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$325per resident / day
operating cost
$9,890per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$323per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165353. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next