Avantara Aurora

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 180 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 77.0 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.22 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.24 to 1.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and weigh a resident weekly. The facility also failed to implement interventions for residents with weight loss. This failure resulted in R76 having a significant weight loss. This applies to 5 of 7 residents (R76, R40, R13, R10, and R53) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stroke, type 2 diabetes, protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, and gastrostomy status. R76's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 23, 2024, showed R76 had moderate cognitive impairment. R76's nutrition care plan dated March 28, 2024, showed, Resident is at risk for alteration in nutritional status related to tube feeding, dysphagia. The care plan continued to show multiple interventions dated March 28, 2024, including Obtain weight as ordered. R76's order summary report dated April 10,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the building environment and plumbing equipment in good repair by ensuring water pipes connected to resident toilets were free from leaks. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for toilet leaks. The findings include:Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed that R1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including reduced mobility, neuropathy, polyarthritis, and a stage 2 sacral pressure ulcer. R1 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] until she was hospitalized on [DATE], and subsequently transferred to another facility.On May 19, 2026, at 10:30 A.M., an environmental tour of room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted with the V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing). The room was occupied by a new resident, R4, who was observed in a reclining wheelchair wearing a cervical collar. R4 stated he was wearing the collar due to a broken neck sustained from a recent fall and noted that he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman facility representative of non-emergent transfer and discharges monthly as the agency requested. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R9, R12, R88, R89) reviewed for discharge in the sample of 23. The findings include:1.R89's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on February 14, 2026. R89 was selected for closed record planned discharge review. On [DATE], at 11:41 AM, V28 (Social Services Assistant) stated R89 was discharged back to the community senior living apartment, where she resided previously. Requested evidence of notification of discharge to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman representative and V28 referred surveyor to V3 (Assistant Administrator).On [DATE], at 11:45 AM, V3 stated the notification to the ombudsman occurs through email notification. V3 provided email notification of R89's discharge that occurred on [DATE], at 11:43 AM. V3 stated the last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming/hygiene for a resident who required assistance for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care.This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R43) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 23. The findings include:On May 11, 2026, at 11:47 AM, R43 was in bed. R43 had about 0.5 to one CM (centimeters) long facial mustache and chin hair. R43 said she doesn't like facial hair and would like to get it shaved, but she couldn't do it by herself.On May 12, 2026, at 11:21 AM, R43 was in bed and still had the same facial hair. R43 said she asked, but no one assisted her with shaving her facial hair. R43 said she forgot the name of the staff she asked to assist her with shaving her facial hair.On May 13, 2026, at 2:41 PM, R43 was in bed and still had the same facial hair. R43 said she asked one of the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) to assist her with shaving her facial hair, but they still haven't done so.According to the EMR (Electronic Medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance and supervision during toileting, for a resident that had limited ability to sit unsupported, was cognitively impaired, with known impulsivity, and at high risk for falls, to prevent a fall that resulted in injury. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R9) reviewed for falls in the sample of 23. R9's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R9 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non dominant side, kidney transplant status, type 2 diabetes, abnormal posture and hypertensive heart disease.R9's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated April 23, 2026, showed R9 was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance with ADL's including supervision with eating and oral hygiene, substantial assistance with upper body dressing, bed mobility and transfer, and dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, and lower body dressing. R9's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform a nutrition assessment and implement interventions for a resident experiencing poor appetite and oral intake, hyperkalemia, and significant weight loss. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 23. The findings include: Social Services progress note, dated May 11, 2026, shows R1's cognition was intact. Hospital nephrology note, dated April 9, 2026, shows R1 experienced hyponatremia, volume overload with edema, high blood potassium, acute kidney injury, and required temporary hemodialysis with her last dialysis treatment on April 2, 2026. Review of R1's Care Plan shows R1 was at risk alteration in nutritional status related to congestive heart failure and morbid obesity and approaches included monitoring for weight loss, obtaining and reporting abnormal labs, weigh as order, and provide diet as order. R1's fluid care plan showed R1 was at risk for adverse reactions related to dehydration or potential fluid deficit due to congestive heart failure, hypertension and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an effective analgesic regimen, reassess a residents unrelieved pain, develop a care plan for pain management or notify the physician of unrelieved pain in accordance with facility policy.This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R94) reviewed for pain management.The Findings include:R94's, EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R94 was[AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis, aftercare follow a right hip replacement, diabetes type 2 and Barrett's esophagus disease.R94's BIMs (Brief Interview for Mental Status) assessment dated [DATE], showed R94 was cognitively intact. On May 11, 2026, at 11:01 AM, R94 was sitting up in bed, using foam abduction pillow between both legs and stated she is uncomfortable when sitting up in a chair and especially uncomfortable while in dialysis. R94 explained that she recently had hip surgery.On May 14,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow their policy for proper controlled medication documentation, storage, and disposal.This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R40, R98) reviewed for controlled medication storage, labeling, and disposal in the sample of 23. Findings include:1. On May 13, 2026, at 2:38 PM, The facility's medication storage room was inspected in the presence of V20 (Nurse). V20 opened the medication storage refrigerator and there was a clear locked box that contained an unopened box of controlled medication (30 milliliters of morphine). V20 said she was new at the facility and was not aware there was any controlled medication stored in the refrigerator. The controlled medication box had a medication label that showed R98's name. V20 said she had worked two shifts on the unit, and they did not account for the controlled medication in the refrigerator at the beginning and end of shifts. V20 looked in the EMR (Electronic Medical Records) and said R98 was discharged from the facility on December 23, 2025. 2. On May 14, 2026, at 2:06…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 26 medication opportunities with 2 errors resulting in a 7.69% medication error rate. This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R16, R29) observed for medication administration in the sample of 23. The findings include:1. On May 12, 2026, at 11:28 AM, V17 checked the medication order on the EMAR (electronic medication administration records), which stated, Difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05 percent, instill one drop in the right eye four times a day for post-cataract surgery. V17 removed an eye drop medication from the medication cart; the label on the bag matched the order exactly. V17 administered one drop of the eyedrops to R29's right eye; it got onto R16's eyelash, and V17 administered another drop to R29's right eye. V17 was inserting the eye drop bottle in the medication bag, and the eye drop bottle label V17 administered to R29 showed, brinzolamide suspension one percent ophthalmic. V17 said she only checked the label on the eye drops bag, did not check the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for proper medication storage and labeling.This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R29, R43) reviewed for medication storage and labeling in the sample of 23. Findings include:1. On May 14, 2026, at 1:40 PM during medication cart inspection with V2 (Director of Nursing/ DON), R43's controlled medication (hydrocodone-APAP 5-325 MG tablet) bingo card pocket three were popped open with the tablet exposed. V2 said medications should not be left exposed and should have been disposed of by two nurses for infection control and to prevent medication diversion.2. On May 12, 2026, at 11:28 AM, during medication administration, a wrong eye drop medication not ordered for R29 was stored in R29's eyedrop medication bag with the correct pharmacy label. V17 administered the wrong eye drop to R29. R29's eye drops medication label and medication order showed, Difluprednate Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05 percent. V17 administered an eye drop medication, Brinzolamide Suspension one percent Ophthalmic into R29's right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve portions of pureed pork in amounts indicated on the planned/approved facility menus. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R73 and R99) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 23. The findings include:Facility document, dated May 14, 2026, shows R73 and R99 had physician orders for pureed diets. On May 12, 2025 at 11:47 AM during lunch service, V26 (Cook) provided one #8 scoop (4 fluid ounces) of pureed pork on each plate when serving two pureed diet lunches. When questioned regarding the serving size, V25 (Food Service Director) examined the diet spread sheet and stated the serving size pureed pork planned on the menu was 2-#10 scoops (approximately 7 fluid ounces total). V25 stated the first two pureed plates did not have enough pureed pork and instructed V26 to provide the third pureed plate with 2-#8 scoops (8 fluid ounces) of pureed pork. After the third/final plate of pureed pork was served, V26 used the #8 scoop and retrieved approximately 6 fluid ounces of pureed pork from the pan on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL