Grove Of Fox Valley,the

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 124.4 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident dependent on staff for all ADLs (Activities of daily Living), from obtaining full thickness burns on the left side of her torso and partial thickness burns that extended from left upper back to top of the left thigh. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for wound care in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in R1 being transferred from the facility to the local emergency room on March 22, 2026, and then transferred to the regional specialty burn center. R1 was admitted to the regional burn center from March 23 through March 26, 2026, with 3% full thickness burns to the left abdomen/flank area with partial thickness burns surrounding the 2 areas of full thickness burn wounds from the left upper back to the left upper thigh. The Findings include:On April 17, 2026, at 4:02 PM, V18 (APN-BC, Advanced Practice Nurse, Board Certified from the Regional Burn Center) stated R1's burn injuries included 2 separate full…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a resident's plan of care for transfers for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for transfers on the sample list of three. This failure resulted in R1's foot getting stuck on the front of R1's wheelchair and R1's foot fracture. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including cerebral palsy, fracture of right tibia, end stage renal disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and atrial fibrillation. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated May 26, 2023, showed R1 was cognitively intact. The MDS shows R1 required extensive assistance of facility staff for transfers between surfaces. R1's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care plan dated November 17, 2022, showed, [R1] has an ADL self-care performance deficit and impaired mobility related to cerebral palsy, end stage renal disease, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, anemia, and fracture of shaft of right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the circumstances surrounding an injury of unknown origin, in accordance with facility policy, when a resident dependent on staff assistance for all ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) sustained a burn injury to the left side of her body. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for wounds in the sample of 5. The findings include:The facility filed a final report dated March 27, 2026, regarding an injury of unknown origin sustained by R1. The report showed V1 (Administrator) was informed by V2 (Director of Nursing) on March 23, 2026, that R1 had been hospitalized for medical evaluation of redness and open area to her abdomen and redness to her left flank area. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated April 1, 2026, showed R1 was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance with oral hygiene, rolling side to side in bed, and upper body dressing and dependent on staff for lower body dressing, bathing, toileting,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain urology recommendations for catheter changes, failed to prevent urinary tract infection, failed to change a catheter when needed, and failed to complete comprehensive assessment for indication of catheter use for residents with indwelling urinary catheter. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for catheter use in the sample of 5. The findings include:1. R2's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes type 2, hemiplegia affecting the left non dominant side, benign prostatic hypertrophy, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 26, 2026, showed R2 was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance with ADLs including substantial assistance with eating, oral hygiene, personal hygiene and upper body dressing, and dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, lower body dressing, bed mobility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement hand hygiene, wear PPE (personal protective equipment) when rendering care and handling linen. This applies to 5 of 5 (R59, R75, R22, R27, and R66) residents reviewed for infection control in sample 25. The findings include:. 1.R59's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease, hypertensive heart disease, acquired absence of right leg below knee, anemia, and retention of urine. On 3/25/2026, at 8:58 AM V4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) after applying for PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) entered room of R59 with supplies for incontinence care in hand. V4 Removed blanket, raised the bed to the appropriate height, and removed the soiled diaper. V4 used perineal wipes to clean resident in the front of perineal area. Turned residents to the side. Changed gloves did not complete hand hygiene and used perineal wipes to clean buttock area. V4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure accuracy of a resident's personal blood glucose monitoring device and failed to accurately write parameters for a resident's blood pressure medication.This applies to 2 of 2 (R9 and R133) residents reviewed for quality care in the sample of 25.The findings include: 1.On 03/25/2026 at 2:05 PM, R133 stated he monitors his own glucose levels with his personal device and reports the result the nurse. R133 stated he has continuous glucose monitoring from a sensor attached to his skin that sends blood glucose levels to his personal cellular device. R133 stated he manages his device himself not facility staff. R133 stated the staff do not check his glucose levels with the facility device. On 03/25/2026 at 4:52 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated R133 had not been assessed for using his personal glucose monitoring system. There is no physician order for R133 self-glucose monitoring. V2 DON stated the nursing staff should be utilizing the facility device to check and document R133's blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly maintain a venous access device.This applies to 1 of 1 residents R94 reviewed for venous access devices in a sample of 25.Findings include:On 03/24/2026 at 11:03 AM, R94 displayed his left upper arm where his single lumen PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) had been inserted. The PICC line was covered by a transparent film dressing and had a dried brown substance underneath it at the insertion site. The transparent film dressing was bubbled not in contact with his skin at the insertion site. The dressing was dated 3/16/26. R94 did not know the day or date of when his PICC line dressing had been changed. R94 stated he was getting IV (Intravenous) antibiotics twice a day.On 03/25/2026 at 4:52 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated PICC line dressings are changed every seven days and as needed. The RN (Registered Nurse) assigned to the resident is responsible for maintaining the PICC line dressing. The PICC line dressing should have been changed when the dried brown substance was noted. If the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error.This applies to 1 of 1 residents R133 reviewed for significant medication errors in a sample of 25. Findings include:On 03/24/2026 at11:34 AM, R133 stated the prescriptions he was taking previously, he had not been receiving as they were ordered since admission to the facility. R133 stated the facility was provided with a list of the medications. R133 stated when he was at home his blood glucose was in a normal range. Since being in the facility his blood glucose readings have been too high.On 03/25/2026 at 4:35 PM, V22 QA (Quality Assurance) Pharmacist stated on 3/15/26 the pharmacy received an order for Metformin IR (Immediate Release) 500mg (Milligrams) twice daily. V22 stated the pharmacy assures there is no drug interaction for the list of medications submitted to them and they deliver the prescriptions. On 03/25/2026 at 4:09 PM, V23 Physician stated R133 was discharged from the hospital with orders. V23 stated he directed the nurse to continue and follow the hospital discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for residents that are dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). This applies to three of seven residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for incontinence care. The finding includes: R1, a [AGE] year-old, admitted on [DATE]. R1's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, other disease of anus/rectum, ulcerative colitis, major depression, neuropathy, and fractures of the 4th and 5th thoracic vertebrae. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 16, 2025, indicates R1 is cognitively intact (BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 15/15) and requires staff assistance with ADLs, including incontinence care. The care plan dated March 24, 2025, directs staff to provide incontinence care every two hours and as needed. R2, a [AGE] year-old, admitted on [DATE]. R2's diagnoses included right below-knee amputation, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, gastroenteropathy. The MDS dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate and timely accounting of controlled medications and failed to ensure that blister packs containing controlled medications are maintained intact to ensure safe and effective use of the medications. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R23, R49, R52, R81 and R103) reviewed for controlled medications in the sample of 27. The findings include: 1. On January 7, 2025 at 10:44 AM with V13 (Assistant Director of Nursing), the Restorative Hall medication cart shift change accountability record for controlled substances showed that the first shift on and off nurses' initials for January 7, 2025 were not documented by both the in-coming and out-going shift nurses to ensure that all controlled medications were accounted at the start of the shift. Inside the controlled medication compartment, multiple controlled medications were observed including: - R49's blister pack of Pregabalin 25 mg (milligram), dispensed by the pharmacy on January 2, 2025 originally containing 30 tablets. The said blister pack of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to obtain a referral for a Corneal Specialist. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R77) reviewed for vision services in the sample of 27. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes. On January 6, 2025, at 10:20 AM, R77 said he has a hard time seeing and had a referral from the eye doctor but has not had an appointment made for him yet. On January 7, 2025, at 12:04 PM, V16 (Social Services) said she received an email from R77's POA (Power of Attorney) on December 19, 2024, requesting R77 have an appointment at a local eye clinic. V16 said she was out of the office until December 27, 2024, and on December 27, 2024, V16 notified V17 (R77's Nurse) to start the process to schedule the appointment for R77. V16 said she followed up with V17 today, and V17 had not started…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide specialized mattress for a resident with worsening acquired pressure injury wound in accordance with wound care practitioner recommendation and their policy. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R54) reviewed for pressure injury wounds in the sample of 27. The findings include: R54's medical record showed R54 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, presence of malignant neoplasm of the breast, presence of cardiac pacemaker, osteoarthritis of the hip, and bilateral nuclear cataract and open angle glaucoma. R54's MDS (Minimum Date Set) dated October 10, 2024, showed R54 was moderately cognitively impaired, and required assistance with ADL (activities of daily living) care including set up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, partial assistance with upper body dressing, personal hygiene and rolling right and left in bed, and substantial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL