Warren Barr Buffalo Grove
150 North Weiland Road, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 · For profit - Partnership · 200 certified beds · (847) 465-0200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jun 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $9,311 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-30)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.2% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 68.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.5% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.1% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.8% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.1% | 63.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.9% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.1% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.98 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.94 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 323 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 156 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.3%CMS range 50.6–64.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 8.0–12.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 71.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 68.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.4%CMS range 3.5–7.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 167.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to a resident exhibiting a change of condition after an initial fall. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a second fall approximately 12 hours later that resulted in a subarachnoid hemorrhage (brain bleed). This applies to 1 of 3 resident (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnosis including cerebral infarct, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarct affecting left non-dominant side, muscle weakness, unspecified dementia, history of falling, atrial fibrillation, type diabetes, chronic embolism and thrombosis, presence of cardiac pacemaker and hypertension. R1's Physician Orders dated October 2023 shows orders for Plavix 75 mg (milligrams) daily for prophylaxis and coumadin (anticoagulant) 3.5 mg daily. R1's Final Incident Report dated 10/18/23 documents (R1) had an unwitnessed fall on 10/18/23 around 5:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accommodate residents' food preferences and allergies for 3 of 5 residents (R1-R3) reviewed for food preferences and allergies in the sample of 5.The findings include:1.R1's admission progress note dated 6/20/26 showed R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia and cerebrovascular accident (stroke). R1 was confused with a history of both short-term and long-term memory loss.R1's progress note dated 6/24/26 showed R1 was identified as having an allergy to eggs. The note showed Allergy to eggs was added to the patient file. Diet form indicating patient food allergy was highlighted and forwarded to the kitchen. A physician order for R1 dated 6/29/26 showed, General diet Regular Texture, Thin liquids consistency, NO EGGS, NO SALT PACKET.On 6/30/26 at 8:50 AM, R1 was seated on the side of her bed with her breakfast tray in front of her. No staff were present in R1's room. An egg and cheese sandwich was noted on R1's tray. R1 had not consumed any of the egg sandwich. R1 pointed to the sandwich and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's representative prior to starting a cognitively impaired resident on a new medication for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for resident notification of changes and/or treatments in the sample of 3.The findings include:R1's care plan dated 6/6/25 showed R1 was cognitively impaired related to her diagnoses of dementia and multiple sclerosis. The plan showed R1 was very forgetful. The plan showed all information provided to R1 should be provided directly to her advocate.R1's Power of Attorney (POA) for Health Care form dated 9/12/24 showed V7 (Family of R1) was R1's POA. On 1/5/26 at 8:32 AM, V7 (Family of R1) stated R1 was started on Losartan (medication to treat high blood pressure) in August 2025 however, V7 was not notified that R1 had been started the medication until 12/17/25. V7 stated, No one told me (R1) was even having high blood pressures. I am in the facility at least twice a week. I just happened to be talking to the cardiology nurse practitioner (on 12/17/25) when she informed me…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was not restrained in bed for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for restraints in the sample of 3. The findings include:R1's Face Sheet shows that he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: aphasia, restlessness and agitation, dementia, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait/mobility and need for assistance with personal care. On 7/31/25 at 10:45 AM, V9 (R1's Daughter) said that when she walked into R1's room to visit, R1 was lying in bed and had a thick mattress positioned on its side along one side of his bed that was being held up with a chair and the other side of his bed was against the wall. V9 said that she went and got a nurse to take it down.On 7/31/25 at 11:40 AM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) said that she did go into R1's room and saw a fall mattress on its side up against R1's bed and it was being held up with a chair. V4 said that she is not sure who put the mattress in that position, but it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Tablet Computer) was not misappropriated for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The findings include: The facility's Abuse Report Final Form dated 6/18/25 shows, On 6/6/25 when [R1]'s friend came to visit her, she reported to the daughter that the (Tablet Computer) was missing and the daughter reached out to [V3] unit manager to inform her .On 6/9/25 [V1], administrator was able to identify that one of the daughter's friends came to see [R1] 6/4/25 around dinner. [R1] was sitting in the nurse's station with her (Tablet Computer) and when the friend arrived, she removed it from the nurse's station and place back in room .On 6/14/25, [V10], Nursing Supervisor called [V1], Administrator around 2:00 PM stating that [V7], [R1]'s daughter called her and informed her that the (Tablet Computer) had been pinged in a proximity of [local hotel] [Local Police] were informed of the allegation of the missing (Tablet Computer) and will investigate . The schedule for 6/4/25 and 6/5/25 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher reached the desired temperature to sanitize dishes to prevent the spread of food borne illness, failed to ensure meat products were covered, dated, and labeled, failed to ensure staff wore beard coverings in the kitchen to prevent cross contamination and failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in sanitary conditions. This failure has the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The CMS 671 dated 1/26/25 show there were 153 residents residing at the facility. 1. On 1/26/25 at 9:10 AM, V5 (Dietary Manager-DM) was in the dishwashing area loading dish racks eight (8) times . V5 said he had to run the dish machine (dishwasher) at least five cycles so the final temperature (temp) reaches at 160 degrees Fahrenheit. (F). After V5 ran the dish machine eight (8) times, the final rinse noted at the dishwasher remained at 130F. V5 said it should be at least 160F. It was important to reach the desired temperature to kill the bacteria in the soiled dishes. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist residents with feeding in a dignified manner. This applies to 5 of 30 (R6, R53, R17, R69, R81) residents reviewed for dignity in the sample of 30. The findings include: On 1/26/2025 at 12:43PM, general dining observations were made. At 12:43PM, V21 Activity Director was observed standing over R6 while assisting her with feeding her lunch. At 12:43PM, V20 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed standing over R53 while assisting her with feeding her lunch. At 12:44PM, V22 CNA was observed standing over R17 while feeding him his lunch. At 12:45PM, V23 CNA was observed standing over R69 while feeding her lunch. At 12:48PM, V24 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed leaning against the window standing over R81 while feeding him his lunch. On 1/26/2025 at 12:48PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said staff should be seated when feeding residents. V2 said it is more comfortable for the resident if the staff sit next to them while they are being fed and it is also a dignity concern. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a palm protector was in place for a resident with a contracture and failed to ensure restorative assessments were done for 4 of 5 residents (R38, R62, R65, R57) reviewed for restorative services in the sample of 30. The findings include: 1. 01/27/25 at 10:18 AM, R38 was sitting up in a chair at the bedside. R38's fingers of his left hand were contracted into his fist. There was nothing observed in R38's left hand. R38 said they usually put something in his hand. On 01/28/25 at 9:18 AM, R38 was up in a chair at the bedside. R38's left hand did not have a palm protector or other device. On 01/28/25 at 10:54 AM, V26 Restorative Nurse said R38 has a left hand contracture and a palm protector should be in on at all times except for hand hygiene and passive range of motion. V26 said the palm protector is to makes sure there is no further decline in R38's contracture and to maintain skin integrity. R38's most recent Restorative UDA Form is dated 12/5/23. R38's Care Plan dated 2/6/20 shows R38 requires…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure multi-use resident equipment was cleaned after being used by a resident on contact isolation, failed to ensure incontinence care was performed in a manner to prevent the spread of infections, failed to ensure staff removed their gloves and washed their hands to prevent to spread of infection and failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling medical device was placed on enhanced barrier precautions. This applies to 6 of 30 residents (R54, R70, R45, R25, R67 and R121) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 30. The findings include: 1. R54's Physician's Order Sheet printed on 1/27/25 shows an order dated 1/23/25 for, Strict contact isolation for Norovirus. On 1/27/25 at 10:49 AM, V18, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) wheeled R54 down the hallway in a dialysis chair to her room. V18 stopped before entering R54's room and took R54's blankets off of her and placed them in the soiled linen cart that was down the hallway. While…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provided residents with privacy during personal cares for two of 30 residents (R81, R121) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 30. The findings include: 1. R81's admission Record dated January 26, 2025 shows R81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including antistrophic lateral sclerosis, anemia, restlessness and agitation, and adult failure to thrive. On January 26, 2025 at 1:13 PM, V13 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) provided incontinence care for R81. R81's door was opened and R81 was visible from the hallway. V13 removed R81's incontinence brief leaving R81's perineal area exposed to the hallway while being turned from side to side. 2. R121's admission Record dated January 29, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, pressure injury of sacral region, and peripheral vascular disease. On January 26, 2025 at 10:44 AM, V12 CNA was providing incontinence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to request a level II PASSAR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) screening for residents with a psychiatric/mood disorder which was added after the resident was admitted to the facility. This applies to 2 of 5 (R99, R119) residents reviewed for PASSAR in the sample of 30. The findings include: R99's PASSAR level 1 screening dated 11/11/2023 shows a determination of No Level II Required. R99's MDS (Minimum Data Set) section I dated 11/11/2024 under psychiatric/mood disorder I5950 Psychotic Disorder (other than schizophrenia) is checked for R99. R119's PASSAR level 1 screening dated 2/1/2023 shows a determination of No Level II Required. R119's MDS (Minimum Data Set) section I dated 11/1/2024 under psychiatric/mood disorder I5950 Psychotic Disorder (other than schizophrenia) is checked for R119. On 1/28/2025 at 1:29PM, V19 Admissions said PASSARs are completed prior to admission to make sure we provide the services the residents needs while they are at the facility. V19 said she was unsure if the PASSAR should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was screened prior to admission for 1 of 5 residents (R96) reviewed for preadmission screenings (PASARR) in the sample of 30. The findings include: On 01/27/25 at 10:03 AM, R96 was sitting up in a reclining chair in his room sleeping. On 01/28/25 at 12:00 PM, V1 Administrator said there was no PASARR done for R96. V1 said he has not left the facility since he was admitted . V1 said admissions is doing a screening now. R96's Face Sheet shows R96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of unspecified dementia and schizophrenia. The facility's PASSAR Screening of Residents with Mental Disorder or Intellectual Disability dated 8/16/24 shows The facility will not allow admission form the hospital without a preadmission screening which includes PASSAR screening for those with mental or intellectual disorder.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for residents that are dependent on staff for two of 30 residents (R25, R1) reviewed for ADLs assistance in the sample of 30. The findings include: 1. R25's admission Record dated January 26, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, history of Covid-19, mid cognitive impairment, scoliosis, pain, and history of falling. R25's Care Plan initiated August 21, 2020 shows, [R25] is incontinent of bowel and bladder, check resident every two hours and assist in toileting as needed. Provide incontinence care after each incontinence episode. The resident requires extensive one staff participation with personal hygiene and oral care. On January 26, 2025 at 9:39 AM, V12 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) provided incontinence care for R25. R25's incontinence brief was saturated with dark urine and soft stool. There was creases in R25's buttocks. V12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain daily weights on a resident with a history of fluid overload and failed to ensure protective arm sleeves were applied as ordered for two of 39 residents (R37, R70) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 30. The findings include: 1. R37's admission Record dated January 27, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, prosthetic heart valve, pleural effusion, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, and stage four chronic kidney disease. R37's Order Review Report dated January 27, 2025 shows an order was entered on January 9, 2025 for daily weight due to diagnosis of congestive heart failure, notify doctor with patient gains three pounds in one day or five pounds in one week, in the morning. R37's Care Plan shows potential for fluid overload. Weight will be obtained as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident that is at high risk for falls. This applies to 1 of 30 residents (R39) reviewed for safety in the sample of 30. The findings include: R39's Face Sheet shows diagnoses of: parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, lack of coordination, unstreadiness of feet and history of falling. On 1/26/25 at 11:22 AM, R39 was in the common area. R39 had a wheelchair pressure sensor alarm attached to his wheelchair. R39 lifted his buttocks off of the seat of the wheelchair multiple times and the alarm did not sound. The In Use light on the alarm box was not on. At 2:16 PM, V29 (Certified Nursing Assistant) had R39 stand from his wheelchair. R39's alarm did not sound when he stood up. V29 turned the alarm box on and it sounded and there was a green light on the alarm box that was blinking In Use. On 1/27/25 at 2:07 PM, V18 (CNA) said that R39 is at fall risk. V18 said that R39 will try and stand on his own but he is not stable and that is why he has an alarm. V18 said that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a nephrostomy and urinary drainage bag below the level of the bladder for 2 of 7 residents (R67, R121) in the sample of 30. The findings include: 1. On 01/27/25 at 09:47 AM, R67 was in bed with her nephrostomy drainage bag containing urine laying on the bed. R67's foot of the bed was elevated making the urine pool at the opening of the nephrostomy drainage bag, and up into the nephrostomy tubing. The urine in the tubing unable to drain into the bag. On 01/27/25 at 12:26 PM, R67's nephrostomy drainage bag remained on the bed in the same position, with the urine unable to drain into the bag. On 01/27/25 at 3:00 PM. R67's nephrostomy drainage bag remained in the same position, with urine backing up into the nephrostomy tubing. On 01/29/25 at 09:31 AM, V2 Director of Nursing said you should position the nephrostomy drainage bag so the flow of urine can go into the bag to prevent infection. V2 said care is provided the same way as an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review that facility failed to ensure placement of a gastrostomy tube was checked prior to administering medication for 1 of 4 residents (R39) reviewed for enteral nutrition in the sample of 30. The findings include: R39's Face Sheet shows that he re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a new diagnosis of gastrostomy. On 1/26/25 at 10:00 AM, V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse) went into R39's room to administer his medications. At that time, R39 said that it is sometimes painful when things are put into his tube. V14 assessed the area and told R39 that she would go slow and then administered his medications. V14 did not check the placement of R39's gastrostomy tube before administering his medications. On 1/28/25 at 1:53 PM, V16 (Registered Nurse) said that the type of gastrostomy tube that R39 had does not have a line to check for placement. V16 showed the gastrostomy tube insertion site and there was no line present. V16 said that placement is always checked before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen tubing and bubble humidifier bottle was changed as ordered and failed to ensure a resident's oxygen humidifier bottle was kept filled for 1 of 8 residents (R32) reviewed for oxygen administration in the sample of 30. The findings include: On 1/26/25 at 11:30 AM, R32 was laying in bed with oxygen being administered via nasal cannula. R32's oxygen tubing and bubble humidifier bottle was labeled 12/13/24. R32's bubble humidifier bottle was empty. On 1/27/25 (Monday) at 12:23 PM, the tubing and bottle were still labeled 12/13/24 and the humidifier bottle was still empty. On 1/126/25 at 11:30 AM, R32 said that she does frequently get sinus pain and a dry nose. On 1/27/25 at 1:37 PM, V28 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said that oxygen tubing and bubblers are changed weekly. V28 said that the bubbler humidifier bottle should be filled before it is empty. R32's Physician's Order Sheet printed on 1/27/25 shows an order dated 9/23/24 for, Change oxygen tubing/bubblers weekly and PRN (as needed)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications according to standard of practice for a resident receiving medications through a gastrostomy tube. There were 25 opportunities with 5 errors resulting in a 20% error rate. This applies to 1 of 7 residents (R39) observed in the medication pass. The findings include: R39's January Medication Administration Record shows that he receives aspirin 81 mg (milligrams) chewable, omeprazole 20 mg, multiple vitamin with minerals, tramadol 25 mg, vitamin D3 25 mcg (micrograms)-2 tablets and carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg-2 tablets via G-tube at 9:00 AM. R39's Physician's Order Sheet does not document that all medications can be given at the same time. On 1/26/25 at 10:00 AM, V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse) prepared R39's morning medications. V14 put R39's aspirin, multivitamin, vitamin D3 and carbidopa-levodopa into a pill crusher pouch, crushed the medications and place them into a medication cup. V14 then opened the omeprazole capsule and placed the contents into the same cup. V14 then went into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication was stored in a secure manner for 1 of 30 residents (R54) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 30. The findings include: On 1/26/25 (Sunday) at 10:32 AM, there was a blue and white capsule in a medication cup on R54's bedside table. R54 said that she was not sure what it was but she thinks that it is something she was supposed to take at breakfast. At 11:11 AM, V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse) brought R54 her medications. V14 said that she was unsure what the medication on her bedside table was. On 1/26/25 at 11:20 AM, V14 verified that the blue and white capsule was PhosLo 667 mg (milligrams). V14 said that medications should never be left at the resident's bedside. V14 said that the resident could forget to take the medication or another resident could take it. R54's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) printed on 1/27/25 shows an order for, PhosLo Oral Capsule 667 MG-Give 3 capsules by mouth with meals for end stage renal disease give at 6 am on HD (Hemodialysis) days. R54's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 residents (R1,R2,R3,R7) had access to their call lights. This applies to 4 of 9 residents observed and reviewed for call light accessibility in the sample of 9. The findings include: 1) R1's electronic face sheet printed on 6/16/24 showed R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, weakness, osteoarthritis, complete traumatic amputation of right hand at wrist level, and dysphagia. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has severe cognitive impairment. (During interview, R1 was oriented to person, place, and situation) R1's care plan dated 6/7/23 showed, (R1) is at low risk for falls related to cerebral infarction, complete traumatic amputation of right hand at wrist level .I prefer to keep the bed in low position for safety, I would like staff to provide me a safe environment: even floors, free from spills or clutter, adequate, glare-free light; a working and reachable call light, the bed in low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement physician's orders for a resident (R1) at risk for bruising. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions in the sample of 9. The findings include: R1's electronic face sheet printed on 6/16/24 showed R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, weakness, osteoarthritis, complete traumatic amputation of right hand at wrist level, and dysphagia. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has severe cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff for bed mobility. R1's care plan dated 9/27/18 showed, Potential for skin bruising related to thin/fragile skin. Use caution during ADL (activities of daily living) care. Handle gently, observe for bruises. R1's progress notes dated 5/27/24 showed, Resident was noted to have a discoloration to right elbow measuring 9x5.5x0cm (centimeters). Skin remains intact with slight bogginess felt in the center. Periwound is intact with no swelling or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the doctor and power of attorney/family when a change in condition occurred for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition. The findings include: The Change in Condition note dated 2/21/24 at 1:31 PM for R1 showed: 9:00 AM - RN (Registered Nurse) checked patient's (R1's) vital signs, blood pressure 98/50, heart rate 67, oxygen saturation 98%, and respiratory rate 18. Patient took all morning meds (medication) as scheduled including midodrine. 10:50 AM - PT (Physical Therapy) and OT (Occupational Therapy) started therapy session together. Patient appeared to be short of breath at room air, therefore therapist instructed on pursed lip breathing and oxygen saturation was checked. It was initially 96% and steadily decreased to 72%. Patient then started on oxygen at 3 liters via nasal cannula, and nurse on duty was called and assessed the resident further. Oxygen saturation increased to 96% on 3 liters per nasal cannula. Nurse instructed therapist to keep the oxygen at 3 liters while doing therapy, and upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the information available in the resident's chart was accurate for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medical records. The findings include: The Face Sheet dated 4/28/24 for R1 showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiomegaly, peripheral vascular disease, diverticulosis, pressure ulcer, spinal stenosis, cellulitis of abdominal wall, end stage renal disease, hyperkalemia, morbid obesity, chronic pain, hypotension, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, essential hypertension, dependence on renal dialysis, and other sequelae following unspecified cerebrovascular disease. The facility's admission Packet Information for R1 was dated 1/15/24 and R1 was admitted on [DATE]. The Consent for the Use of side rails, Fall Prevention Education Material, Informed Consent for Influenza Vaccination, Informed Consent for Pneumonia Vaccination, and Informed consent for Vaccination (RSV - respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 2/28/24 at 12:07 PM, V9 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was sitting at a table feeding R71 while R56 sat at the same table without a food tray in front of her. R96 was brought over to the same table as R71 and R56 and did not have a food tray in front of her. V9 stated they have early trays for the residents that need to be fed and they feed those residents before other residents are given their food trays. At 12:18 PM, R56 was given her food tray and was able to feed herself. The food trays were removed from the food cart and were delivered to residents at different tables. Some residents were eating at the same table while others waited for their food trays. R96 was sitting at the table with R71 who had finished eating and R56 who had just received her tray. R96 stated she wanted her food and that she was hungry. R96 stated she needed to be fed. V13 (Activity Aide) told R96 he would look for her tray of food but he could not feed her because he was an activity aide. R96 yelled, Help me, Help me! On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide oral care and failed to ensure a resident received a shower for 2 of 3 residents (R301, R1) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On 2/27/24 at 10:55 AM, R301 was lying on her back, in bed. R301's lips were dry and cracked. There was a line of brown debris to the corners of her both, just below the lips. R301's tongue was dry and coated in white material. R301's teeth were coated in a white film. During the interview, R301's voice was rasping and her lips kept sticking to her teeth. R301 stated, Just a minute. It's so hard for me to talk. My mouth is so dry. R301 closed her mouth and swallow. R301's speech was difficult to understand at times, due to the dryness of her mouth, tongue, and lips. R301 said she had not received any oral care today. R301 said they are supposed to help me brush my teeth in the morning, but no one has been in here yet. R301 did not have any water at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure heels were off-loaded for a resident with contractures and history of pressure injury to her heels for 1 of 10 residents (R67) reviewed for pressure in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 2/28/24 at 10:15 AM, R67 was in bed on her left side with splints in place to her hands. R67 had braces on her legs. The left side of R67's foot and heel was on the mattress of her bed not offloaded. R67 had a scarred area to her left heel with some red discoloration in the middle of the scarred area. On 2/28/24 at 1:15 PM, V7 (Wound Care Certified Nursing Assistant) and V8 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Wound Nurse) went into R67's room to change the dressing to her stage 4 pressure ulcer on her sacrum. R67 was laying on her right side in bed with a thin pillow between her legs. The right side of R67's foot and heel were resting on the mattress. V8 stated R67's left heel looked red where she had a previous heel wound. V8 stated they are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident with dysphagia during meal time for 1 resident (R8) and failed to transfer a resident with a gait belt for 1 resident (R70). These failures apply to 2 of 10 residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R8's electronic face sheet printed on 2/29/24 showed R8 has diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, chronic fatigue, dementia with behaviors, pseudobulbar affect, delusional disorder, bipolar disorder, type 2 diabetes, and major depressive disorder. R8's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R8 has severe cognitive impairment and receives a mechanically altered diet. R8's physician's orders dated 10/9/23 showed, General diet, pureed texture, nectar thick liquids. R8's nursing care plan dated 10/10/23 showed, Swallowing problems: some risk to potentially choke or aspirate food or liquids. This problem is related to diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform safe medication administration for one residents (R7) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration on the total sample list of 18. The findings include: R7's February 2024 medication administration record showed R7 receives aspirin 81mg (milligrams), dutasteride 0.5mg, cranberry capsule 425mg, flomax 0.4mg, folic acid 800mg, isosorbide mononitrate ER (extended release) 30mg, nifedipine ER 60mg, methocarbamol 750mg, and sodium bicarbonate 650mg at 9:00AM. On 2/27/24 at 10:47 AM, V18 (Registered Nurse) took R7's medications into his room and set them on his overbed table. V18 assessed R7 and then told him to take his medications and left the room. V18 stated, I know he will take his medications, he's good about it. I have a few residents that I leave them in the room for them. I know it's not best practice but this is a busy unit so we have to keep moving. On 2/28/24 at 11:07 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, It is not our practice to leave medications at the bedside for residents to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications at ordered times. There were 31 opportunities with 5 errors resulting in a 16.13% medication error rate. This applies to 2 of 7 residents (R7 and R84) reviewed in the medication pass on tthe total sample list of 18. The findings include: 1. R7's February 2024 medication administration record showed R7 receives ferrous sulfate 325mg (milligrams), methocarbamol 750mg, sodium bicarbonate 650mg, and adalat 60mg at 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM every day. On 2/27/24 at 10:47 AM, V18 (Registered Nurse) took R7's medications into his room and set them on his overbed table. V18 assessed R7 and then told him to take his medications and left the room. V18 stated, I know he will take his medications, he's good about it. I have a few residents that I leave them in the room for them. I know it's not best practice but this is a busy unit so we have to keep moving. (1 hour and 47 minutes past the ordered administration time). 2. R84's February 2024 medication administration record showed R84 receives Senna S…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to refrigerate and label open insulin vials with open and use by dates. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R14) reviewed for Medication Storage in a sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On 2/27/24 at 1:28 PM, the 300 hall medication cart had R14's open, multi dose vial of Novolog insulin with no open or use by date on it. The vial had 50 units left in it. R14's Levemir flexpen had no open or use by date and had 150 units left in it. R14's un-opened Tresiba pen was not refrigerated. The packaging for the Tresiba pen had a sticker on it that shows to Refrigerate. On 2/27/24 at 1:42 PM, V18 RN (Registered Nurse) said, We should have insulin dated so we know when it was opened and when to discard it, and to ensure it remains effective. V18 said, We should be discarding it after 28 days, but we wouldn't know the 28 days unless it was labeled with the opened date. On 2/28/24 at 11:07 AM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said, insulin vial dates should contain the open and use by dates, because without them you wouldn't know…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide water/other liquids for a resident for one of five residents (R301) reviewed for hydration in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 2/27/24 at 10:55 AM, R301 was lying on her back, in bed. R301's lips were dry and cracked. There was a line of brown debris to the corners of her both, just below the lips. R301's tongue was dry and coated in white material. R301's teeth were coated in a white film. During the interview, R301's voice was rasping and her lips kept sticking to her teeth. R301 stated, Just a minute. It's so hard for me to talk. My mouth is so dry. R301 closed her mouth and swallow. R301's speech was difficult to understand at times, due to the dryness of her mouth, tongue, and lips. R301 said she had not received any oral care today. R301 did not have any water at the bedside. R301 said a drink of water would be nice. On 2/29/24 at 10:19 AM, R301 was sitting in a dialysis chair, outside the door to dialysis. V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) pushed R301 back to her room. V3 and V4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of 5 residents (R1-R5) reviewed for sufficient staffing in the sample of 8. The findings include: On 11/1/23 at 6:14 PM, R1 said the facility is short-staffed. Mostly on the overnight shifts and the weekends. R1 said the weekend of 10/27/23-10/29/23, they had one CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) for 68 residents. R1 said she told V3 (CNA) she had been waiting for over two and a half hours for assistance and V3 said she was sorry, but there was not enough staff, and she could not get to everyone who had their call light on. R1 said V3 told her that she had her light on earlier in the night and she tended to her needs, however, she was trying to get to the residents that she had not gone to yet. R1 said she has heart disease and is getting weaker. She needs staff to help her with getting up and walking with a gait belt and a walker. On 11/2/23 at 10:42 AM, R1 was in her motorized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a resident centered plan of care, notify a physician timely of abnormal diagnostic test results and failed to ensure a resident was immediately transported to the emergency room for evaluation for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet shows that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Hypertension, Anxiety and Heart Failure. R1's Change of Condition Note dated 8/5/23 at 6:09 PM shows, The patient was using bathroom for BM (bowel movement), was assisted by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), after sometime, the CNA came to attending nurse to notify that the patient was having difficulty breathing, the patient noted with SOB (Shortness of Breath), the patient was using her accessory muscle to breathe in and out. VS (vital signs) high BP (blood pressure), pulse high, and RR (respiration rate) was also high. The patient got weak .had given the patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the privacy of residents' personal health information for 4 of 4 residents (R71, R44, R111, R21) in the sample for privacy of the medical record and 16 residents outside the sample (R104, R122, R114, R91, R7, R123, R57, R42, R61, R64, R88, R98, R20, R115, R30, R117). The findings include: On 3/29/23 at 9:00 AM, V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) walked past this surveyor near the nurses' station. The medication cart was sitting at the end of this hallway, unsupervised. The surveyor arrived at the medication cart. The computer mounted on the medication cart had R42's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) displayed on the screen (anyone passing the cart would have access to R42's personal information). On the top of the medication cart was a nurse report sheet with room numbers, resident names, how the residents take their medications, code status, and resident specific notes regarding their medical needs and care. V7 (Restorative Aide)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer dressings were in place, failed to provide wound care as ordered, failed to assess and ensure the physician was aware of a wound, and failed to implement pressure reducing interventions for 3 of 8 resident (R186, R1, R73) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 27. The findings include: 1. R186's face sheet printed on 3/30/23 showed diagnoses including but not limited to heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, fracture of pelvis, and orthopedic aftercare. R186's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and extensive staff assistance required for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and hygiene. The same assessment showed R186 is occasionally incontinent of urine and bowel. R186's wound assessment report dated 3/30/23 showed an unstageable pressure ulcer to the sacrum and a stage 3 pressure ulcer to the left buttock present on admit.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to keep smoking paraphernalia in a designated area for residents with a history of unsafe smoking for 1 of 2 residents (R71) reviewed for smoking in the sample of 27 and 1 resident (R38) outside the sample. The findings include: 1. On 3/28/23 at 10:27 AM, R71 was sitting in her wheelchair in the hallway. R71 was wearing a black shirt, with a burn hole on the stomach area of the shift, and a heavy jacket. R71 stated, I just came in from smoking and it was cold out there this morning. I'm freezing from my legs down. I go out 2-3 times a day. Basically the door is open from 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM and I can go whenever I want. I have my cigarettes and lighter in my purse. There was a small purse hanging from R71's wheelchair. R71 pointed to the purse and stated, They're in there. R71 smelled of cigarette smoke. R71 said she goes out by herself and is not supervised by facility staff. On 3/30/23 at 8:49 AM, R71 self-propelled her wheelchair from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter care was provided in a manner to prevent potential infection and failed to ensure urinary drainage tubing was not in contact with the floor for 2 of 3 residents (R8, R73) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in the sample of 27. The findings include: 1. On 3/28/23 at 1:40 PM, V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) emptied urine from the urine bag into a urinal. In the process of emptying the urine into the urinal, the spout of the urine bag touched the wall of the urinal. V16 did not clean the tip of the urine bag spout before replacing it in its holder. On 3/30/23 at 11:10 AM, V16 (CNA) stated that she touched the spout of the urine bag on the side of the urinal and that it was wrong. V16 stated that she did not wipe the spout before replacing it in the holder. V16 stated that this practice was wrong because it could cause potential infection to the resident. V16 stated that she has had in-service on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions for a resident with unplanned significant weight loss for 1 of 2 residents (R6) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 27. The findings include: R6's face sheet showed the resident resided on the memory care unit with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, cardiomyopathy, dementia, and anemia. On 3/28/23 at 12:35 PM, R6 was in bed with her eyes closed. R6 remained in bed through 2:20 PM when observations ceased. From 12:35 PM to 2:04 PM, R6's lunch tray sat on the counter of the third floor dining room. R6's lunch tray was never delivered to the resident in her room and was sent back to the kitchen. There was no ice cream or coffee on the tray. R6 did not exhibit any behaviors. On 3/29/23 at 9:16 AM, R6 was in bed on her left side with her eyes closed. R6's full untouched breakfast tray sat on her bedside table. The table was not within reach of R6. On 3/30/23 at 9:44 AM, R6 was dressed and ambulated to the dining/activity room. R6's breakfast tray was set in front of her as she sat at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care and services that are in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 (R36, R54) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy in the sample of 27. The findings include: 1. On 3/28/23 at 11:00 AM, R36's mask used for nebulizer treatment was left on the nightstand uncovered. The canister to pour the nebulization solution was wet and attached to the mask. The BiPap (positive airway pressure) machine mask was left on the nightstand uncovered. The oxygen tubing connected to R36's nasal cannula, the humidifier on the oxygen concentrator, the nebulization machine mask and tubing did not have a label with date on them. On 3/28/23 at 12:15 PM, V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) propelled R36 in a high-back reclining chair towards the elevator for dialysis appointment. R36's nasal cannula was not connected to an oxygen source. There was no oxygen cylinder anywhere on the chair. On 3/28/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications remained under direct supervision of a licensed nurse for 1 of 5 residents (R42) observed for medication administration in the sample of 27. The findings include: On 3/29/23 at 9:00 AM, V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) walked past this surveyor near the nurses' station. The medication cart was sitting at the end of this hallway, unsupervised. The surveyor arrived at the medication cart. There was a short acting insulin pen and long-acting insulin pen lying on top of the medication cart unsupervised. V7 (Restorative Aide) exited R42's room and stated, I don't know where the nurse went. At 9:04 AM, V17 (LPN) returned to the medication cart with additional long-acting insulin pens. V17 placed the additional insulin pens on top of the medication cart and entered R42's room. At 9:06 AM, V17 exited R42's room and returned to the medication cart. At 1:50 PM, V17 said she ran out of a R42's long-acting insulin and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure PPE (personal protective equipment) was worn in a manner to prevent cross contamination for 3 of 8 residents (R186, R127, R8) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 27. The findings include: 1. On 3/29/23 at 11:40 AM, R186 had a PPE bin outside her door. There was a large sign on the door of her room that said, STOP Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The signage had illustrations to show gloves and gowns must be worn when inside the room. The sign clearly stated gowns to be worn when high-contact resident care activities were performed. The care activities included but were not limited to wound care and changing briefs. V10 (Wound Care Nurse) prepared supplies to perform wound care for R186 and entered the room. V10 said R186 gets daily dressing changes done by the wound care nurse. V10 went to the bedside and removed R186's incontinence brief. At 11:50 AM, V11 (second Wound Care Nurse) entered the room wearing a gown. V10 performed wound care to R186's buttocks while V11 held the resident on her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$9,311 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $9,311 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 88 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 88; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOROS GENERATION TRUST U/A/D 1/3/12 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 26% | since 06/01/2023 |
| GPN FAMILY TRUST U/A/D 4/28/08 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 60% | since 06/01/2023 |
| OAKWAY OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 06/01/2023 |
| BUFFALO GROVE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/08/2025 |
| SHABAT, MENACHEM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| LEGACY HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| DOMINOWSKI, MELISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| KIM, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| ROTH & CO, LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145819. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.