Harmony Healthcare & Rehab Ctr
3919 West Foster Avenue, Chicago, IL 60625 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (773) 588-9500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Oct 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $5,244 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-02)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.4% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 98.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.4% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.6% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 55.0% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.4% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.04 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.85 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.0%CMS range 45.3–60.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.1–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 72.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.8–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.57 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 171.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.81 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R3) received the necessary treatment and care for R3 to maintain the highest level of functioning. Failed to identify and treat symptoms of altered cardiovascular status in a patient with CHF, hypertension and stage 3 kidney disease. This failure resulted in R3 having a weight gain of 53.4 pounds, 48% weight gain in 6 months. This failure affected one resident (R3) out of two residents reviewed for death. This failure resulted in R3's hospitalization with a diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure and diuresing 15 pounds of fluid. Findings include:R3's medical diagnoses include but are not limited to chronic kidney disease, essential hypertension, chronic diastolic heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, shortness of breath, obstructive sleep apnea.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C dated 07/03/25 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 indicating R3's cognition in moderately impaired.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section GG dated 07/03/25 documents in part, C. Toileting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement effective fall precaution interventions for a resident (R2) identified as a fall risk for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for fall precautions.Findings Include:R2's Facesheet documents that R2 has diagnoses not limited to: unspecified dementia, carcinoma in situ of bladder, essential hypertension, chronic kidney disease, orthostatic hypotension, mild cognitive impairment of unknown etiology, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery, repeated falls, anxiety disorder, unspecified, age related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, adult failure to thrive, hyperlipidemia, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, anemia, unsteadiness on feet, history of falling.R2's MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R2 does not score on the BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating that R2 is severely cognitively impaired and has memory problems. R2 requires…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to access EMS (Emergency Medical Services) for one of one residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition in a total sample of three residents. Findings include: R1's face sheet documents R1 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on 12.12.2024, with diagnoses including but not limited to: Intrahepatic Bile Duct Carcinoma, Acquired Total Absence of Pancreas, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Adult Failure to Thrive, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertension. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set of 12.14.2024) documents R1 is moderately cognitively impaired. 1.6.2025, 9:00 PM, General Progress Note documents in part: 3:30 PM- noted resident lying on bed comfortably. No respiratory distress noted. Vital signs taken as follows BP 110/ 64, respiratory rate 20, heart rate 84, oxygen level 92% RA (room air), temperature 98.7, blood sugar 128. Due meds given and well tolerated. At around 5:00 PM, NOD (Nurse On Duty) made a quick round and noted resident verbalized that he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents participated in care planning conferences for 5 (R14, R4, R136, R20, R59) out of 5 residents reviewed in a final sample of 33. Findings Include: On 9/4/24 at 9:52 AM, interviewed R14 and stated admitted in the facility four months ago. R14 stated has not attended any care plan meeting to discuss R14's plan of care. R14's electronic health records show R14 was admitted in the facility on 4/30/24 with diagnoses included but not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety, and schizoaffective disorder. R14 had a completed quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/22/24. R14's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was coded as 13, which means R14 is cognitively intact. R14's EHR lacked documentation if a care conference was conducted for R14. On 9/4/24 at 9:56 AM, interviewed R136 and stated admitted in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident individualized diet order and food plan was followed affecting one resident (R159) out of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility also failed to ensure the diet spreadsheet and recipes were followed for pureed food preparation affecting all 22 residents receiving pureed diets in the facility's kitchen. Findings Include: On 09/03/24 at 10:41 AM, R159 said, all my meals are pureed, and I get mashed potatoes at almost all my meals which I am really sick of. I don't know why they cannot puree other things for me, so I don't get the same thing every day. R159 stated R159 is not allowed any liquids except water and is only allowed to have ice cream once a day. R159 said, it's because of my swallowing. Sometimes thin liquids go into my lungs instead of into my stomach. On 9/03/24 12:37 PM, observed R159 eating lunch in R159's room. R159 received single portions of pureed pork, what appeared to be mashed potatoes (pureed rice listed on menu), pureed vegetable, ice cream, yellowed colored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to (a) ensure staff handled medications in a sanitary manner and performed hand hygiene for 4 (R53, R99, R114, R153) of 5 residents reviewed during the medication administration; (b) post Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage for 2 (R30 and R64) residents with an indwelling medical device, and (c) wear proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during high contact resident care activities. These failures have the potential to affect 55 residents residing on 3rd floor and 59 residents residing on 4th floor as of census dated 9/3/24. The findings include: On 9/03/24 at 10:18 AM, R30 Observed lying in bed, head of bed slightly elevated, alert with confusion. Observed with IV fluids D5 0.45% NACL infusing on right arm at 40cc/hr. Requested V5 (Registered Nurse / RN) to R30's room, V5 donned gloves and access IV site by removing kerlix wrap to check IV dressing. V5 did not wear gown. No EBP signage posted on room entrance, no PPE supplies available nearby or by the hallway. She said IV fluid was started 3-4 days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility: failed to ensure staff did not stand while feeding 2 (R34, and R95) residents that are dependent on staff for assistance with eating and Failed to treat one resident (R417) with respect and dignity by not passing out meals to all residents sitting at the same table at the same time during dining observation in a sample of 33. Findings include: 1. R34's face sheet documents in part; medical diagnoses including but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia, Acute Cough, and other Seizures. R34's physician orders sheet document in part; R34 requires total assistance with meals, strict aspiration precautions. On 09/03/24 at 12:24 PM, R34 was in bed with head of the bed elevated. R34's bed was close to the floor, and there was a chair at R34's bed side. V24 (Restorative Aide) stood on R34's right side and fed R34. V24 was standing and not at eye level with R34. V24 stated that V24 forgot to sit, and that V24 should be seated to feed R34 to keep R34 at eye level and to prevent R34…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to determine self-administration of medication was appropriate for one resident (R70) in a sample of 33. Findings include: R70's face sheet documents in part medical diagnoses including but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, flexion deformity left fingers joints, pain in left fingers, and adult failure to thrive. R70's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R70 is moderately cognitively intact. On 09/03/24 at 10:48 AM, surveyor observed Lidocaine 4% External Analgesic Cream on R70's bed side table. R70 stated one of the nurses gave R70 the Lidocaine cream couple of months ago for R70's left finger pain. R70 stated R70 uses the cream every other day, and R70 had used the cream this morning. On 09/03/24 at 2:53 PM, interviewed V12 (Registered Nurse/RN) who stated that all medications must have a doctor's order, and no medication either over the counter (OTC) or prescription should be kept at the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain a Physician order and update the resident record with the correct code status for 1 (R85) resident reviewed for Advance Directives in a sample of 33. Findings Include: R85 has diagnosis not limited to Primary Osteoarthritis, Right Ankle and Foot, Alzheimer's Disease with Late Onset, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Nontoxic Single Thyroid Nodule, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3, Dementia, Long Term (Current) use of Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs, Long Term (Current) use of Insulin, Primary Generalized (Osteo) Arthritis, Cerebral Infarction due to Thrombosis of Right Middle Cerebral Artery, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Major Depressive Disorder, Hypothyroidism, Long Term (Current) use of Anticoagulants, Localized Edema, Anxiety Disorders, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Difficulty In Walking and Abnormalities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's Advance Directives care plan was revised after three hospitalizations and readmissions to the facility for 1 (R85) resident reviewed for Advance Directives in a sample of 33. Findings Include: R85 has diagnosis not limited to Primary Osteoarthritis, Right Ankle and Foot, Alzheimer's Disease with Late Onset, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Nontoxic Single Thyroid Nodule, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3, Dementia, Long Term (Current) use of Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs, Long Term (Current) use of Insulin, Primary Generalized (Osteo) Arthritis, Cerebral Infarction due to Thrombosis of Right Middle Cerebral Artery, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Major Depressive Disorder, Hypothyroidism, Long Term (Current) use of Anticoagulants, Localized Edema, Anxiety Disorders, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Need for Assistance with Personal Care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was properly labeled for 1 (R136) resident, and to ensure residents received the correct oxygen flow rate as ordered by the physician for 2 (R50, R136) out of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings Include: 1. On 9/3/24 at 10:51 AM, R136 was lying in bed alert and able to verbalize needs. R136 was using oxygen via nasal cannula. R136's oxygen concentrator flow rate was set to 3.5 liters per minute (LPM). R136's oxygen tubing was not labeled when it was last changed. R136 stated R136 has Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and nursing staff sets R136's oxygen. R136 denied changing the flow rate of the oxygen concentrator. At 10:53 AM, interviewed V21 (Registered Nurse) and stated oxygen tubing is changed weekly and as needed. V21 stated oxygen tubing is supposed to be labeled to let the staff know when it was last changed. V21 stated R136 is supposed to be getting oxygen at 3LPM continuously. R136's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adaptive eating equipment was provided to 2 (R96 and R135) residents to facilitate self-feeding. This failure affected 2 (R96 and R135) of 2 residents reviewed for assistive device during mealtime in the sample of 33 residents. The findings include: R96's admission record documented admission date on 10/21/2023 with diagnoses not limited to Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, Difficulty in walking, Alzheimer's disease, Unspecified dementia, Adult failure to thrive, Anemia, Presence of cardiac pacemaker. R135's admission record documented admission date on 6/7/2023 with diagnoses not limited to Huntington's disease, Adjustment disorder with depressed mood, Dysphagia, Anemia, Unspecified dementia. On 9/3/24 at 12:18 PM, During dining observation, R135 sitting up on wheelchair in the dining room. Lunch tray served with divider plate with rice, ground meat, mixed vegetables, juice, coffee. R135 observed with involuntary movements,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall precaution interventions for one (R2) resident identified as a fall risk out of three residents reviewed for fall precautions. Findings include: On 03/23/2024 at 9:02AM, surveyor observes a yellow star on R2's door next to R2's name. R2 observed lying in R2s' bed resting inside of R2s' room in a supine position with head of bed elevated at 45 degrees. R2s' floor mat was observed located in between two closet cabinets leaning against them in R2's room. R2's bed also observed to not be in the lowest position. On 03/23/2024 at 9:08AM, V5 (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) states she works for an agency and this is the first time she has ever worked at the facility. V5 states she is the CNA responsible for caring for R2. V5 states she is aware that the yellow stars next to resident names indicate the resident is a fall risk. V5 states she was made aware by V4 (LPN) that V5 (Agency CNA) should watch those residents closely.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to maintain a resident's (R2) rights to privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical information for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for residents' rights. Findings include: On 02/16/2024 at 3:00 PM, V8 (R1's Power of Attorney for Healthcare) stated during R1's discharge, V9 put a bunch of medications in a bag and gave it to V8 without individually going through each medication blister pack. V8 did not realize R2's medications were also in the bag until a few days later. V8 received blister packs of R2's Escitalopram Oxalate 5 MG (milligram) and Levothyroxine 50 MCG (microgram). V8 stated the blister packs contain R2's name, doctor, medication name, dosage, and why R2 is on the medication - depression and hypothyroidism. V8 provided a picture of R2's medication label for Levothyroxine 50 MCG and Escitalopram 5 MG. Levothyroxine label documents in part prescription number, date of 11/22/2023, R2's previous room number, R2's name, medication name, dosage, frequency, and indication-hypothyroidism. Label also documents in part…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident belongings were returned after discharge for one (R2) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. Findings include: R2's face sheet documents that R2 was discharged from the facility to a local psychiatric hospital on [DATE]. R2 is no longer at the facility. On 09/30/2023 at 12:05 PM, V8 (R2's family member) stated that approximately at the end of August 2023, she informed V3 (Social Services Director) and V4 (Social Services Coordinator) of R2's missing money totaling $49 dollars and R2's missing belongings. V8 stated that she had been in contact with V3 and V3 told her that R2 did not have any belongings at the facility. V8 stated she had been in contact with V4 and V4 stated that he would follow up with V8 regarding R2's missing belongings. V8 stated it had been weeks since she heard anything so she contacted V1 (Assistant Administrator) and told V1 about R2's missing belongings. V8 stated that R2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report and investigate misappropriation of property for one (R2) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. Findings include: On 09/30/203 at 12:05 PM, V8 (R2's family member) stated that approximately at the end of August 2023, she informed V3 (Social Services Director) and V4 (Social Services Coordinator) of R2's missing money totaling $49 dollars and R2's missing belongings. V8 stated that she had been in contact with V3 and V3 told her that R2 did not have any belongings at the facility. V8 stated she had been in contact with V4 and V4 stated that he would follow up with V8 regarding R2's missing belongings. V8 stated it had been weeks since she heard anything so she contacted V1 (Assistant Administrator) and told V1 about R2's missing belongings. On 09/30/2023 at 3:35 PM, V1 (Assistant Administrator) stated she did not report allegations of theft to the state agency and was currently in the process of reporting to the state agency. V1 states she did not report this because the term theft…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide their bed hold policy, upon discharge to hospital, for one (R2) of three resident reviewed. Findings include: R2's medical record (Face Sheet, MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R2 is a [AGE] year-old male who is cognitively intact with a BIMS/ Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14/15. R2 has diagnoses not limited to: metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, schizoaffective disorders, major depressive disorder, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, and post-traumatic stress disorder. On 10/01/2023 at 9:21 AM V10 (admission Director) stated I sent out a bed hold notification to management and it's a template that I always follow when I send out the bed hold notifications. I send this template out via email every time a resident goes out to the hospital. I am not familiar with the bed hold policy but I do not send anything directly to the resident or their families, I only send it internally to V11 (Hospital Liaison) and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Basedonobservations interviews andrecordreviews thefacilityfailedtoensure that thelowairlossmattressissetonthe appropriatesettingfor4 residents(R0, R2, R4, andR36) reviewedforpressureulcerpreventioninthetotalsampleof57 residents Findingsinclude 1. On08/28/23 10:34 AM R2 waslyingonalowairlossmattresswithasettingbelow80lbs ThisobservationwaspointedouttoV4 (CertifiedNursingAssistant. V4 statedsettingisbelow80 andnormalpressure On08/28/23 10:53 AM V1 (WoundCareCoordinator statedI(V1) amcheckingthesettingofthelowairlossmattresses I(V1) startedatthe4thfloorgoingdownto2ndfloor V1 checkedR2'sweightonthesheetofpaperV1 washoldingontherequestofthesurveyorandstatedshe(R2) weighs157lbs V1 thencheckedR2'ssettingoflowairlossmattressandstateditsbelow80lbs Thesupportsurfaceismuchsofter thelowairlossmattressisnotusedtothefullextent On08/30/2023 at12:45 pm V11 statedifthe residentweighs157 pounds thesettingofthelowairlossmattressshouldnotbebelow80lbs Itistoolow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure incoming and outgoing nurses counted the controlled medications during shift change, failed to document dispensing of controlled medication, and failed to follow pharmacy instruction to refrigerate medications. These failures affected 4 residents (R27, R110, R140, and R141) reviewed for pharmacy services and records and have the potential to affect all 44 residents on 2nd floor Team 2 and 3rd floor Team 3. Findings include: The (08/31/2023) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented that 2nd floor Team 2 include residents in rooms 214, 215-2, 217-229; and 3rd floor Team 3 include residents in rooms 303, 305, 306-312. The (08/28/2023) Daily Census documented that there were 27 residents in 2nd floor Team 2 and 17 residents in 3rd floor Team 3. On 08/29/2023 at 12:01 pm, on 3rd floor, during the medication storage and labeling task of the medication cart labeled as Team 3, surveyor along with V19 (Registered Nurse) observed that R141's Morphine Sul (sulfate) Tab 30 mg ER (extended release)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medication vials are contained in original packaging for 1 resident (R142), failed to discard expired flu vaccine, failed to check the temperature of vaccine refrigerator at a minimum of two times daily, and failed to ensure the refrigerator was within the required temperature. These failures have the potential to affect all the residents on 3rd floor. Findings include: On [DATE] at 11:48 am, on 3rd floor, during the medication storage and labeling task of the medication cart labeled as Team 3 along with V19 (Registered Nurse), surveyor observed 4 cyclosporin eye drop vials in the first drawer without labels and not contained in original packaging. This was pointed out to V19. V19 stated those are for (R142); they are not in original packaging. V19 opened the bottom drawer of the medication cart and showed this surveyor the original packaging of the cyclosporin eye drop vials. The original packaging had R142's identifier and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide required oxygenation assistance for one resident (R30). This failure has the potential to affect one resident R30 out a sample of 57. Findings: R30 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Benign Neoplasm of Cerebral Meninges, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Chronic Embolism and Thrombosis of unspecified Vein and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Exacerbation. R30's Brief Interview for Mental Status is 07 that indicates moderately impaired. On 8/28/2023 at 10:55 am, surveyor observed R30 wearing a nasal cannula and the oxygen concentrator set at 0 liters. On 8/28/2023 at 10:56 am, V7 (RN) stated that R30's oxygen concentrator was on 2 liters, but it is on 0 liters now and he is not getting oxygen through his nasal cannula. On 8/30/2023 at 3:00 pm, V2 (DON) stated the expectation is for the nurses to carry out and implement the doctor's order. V2 stated that the oxygen concentrator should be set at the desired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date oxygen tubing per the facility policy. This failure affected one resident (R90) reviewed for oxygen equipment, in a total sample of 57 residents. Findings include: On 08/29/23 at 10:30 am, surveyor observed R90 in bed awake and alert. R90 was observed with 2 liters oxygen via nasal cannula with tubing in place unlabeled and not dated. When R90 was asked regarding R90's nasal cannula oxygen tubing, R90 stated, You would do better by asking the nurse when the oxygen tubing was last changed, I really do not pay attention when the nurse comes in to change the oxygen tubing. On 08/29/23 at 10:43 am, V17 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated I don't see a label dated with a date that the oxygen tubing was changed. V17 stated the nurse should put a label on the oxygen tubing indicating the date the tubing was changed. V17 stated placing a date on the oxygen tubing avoids the tubing being in place too long and the resident getting an infection. V17 stated the nurse is responsible for changing the oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy on sanitation and food safety by failing to date open food items with open date and use by date. This failure has the potential to affect 151 residents who are on an oral diet. Findings include: On 11/01/2022 at 9:53 am, in the kitchen freezer, surveyor and V4 (Dietary Manger) observed the following open food items with no opened by date and no use by date: Carrots in a plastic bag, noted bag on the bottom shelf on top of a box. No open or use by date. Chocolate vanilla/strawberry ice-cream, No open on date or use by date. Chicken legs in a knotted plastic bag, placed in a tin pan. The chicken legs were observed to have a lot of ice inside the plastic bag. No open on date or use by date. Beef sausages in a knotted plastic bag. No open date or use by date. In the fridge was observed: 4 small containers of facility made salad dressing with use by date of 10/29/2022. In the dry food section was observed: An open bag of potato chips, no open on date or use by date. Open 50lb bag of dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a.) staff donned the appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) prior to entering Transmission Base Precaution Rooms and b.) failed to ensure linen was stored on the linen cart to prevent contamination. This deficient practice has to potential to affect all residents residing on the 3rd floor of the facility. Third floor census= 52 residents. Finding Include: On 11/01/2022 at 12:23 pm, V13 (Agency CNA) observed standing inside of R9 and R107's room (identified as a contact isolation room). V13 observed wearing an N95 mask and face shield only while standing inside of R9 and R107's room. V13 states I am supposed to be wearing a gown and gloves while inside of R9 and R107s' room. If I am not wearing proper PPE then I can spread an infection. V14 (CNA) observed walking into R9 and R107's room with a meal tray and briefly walking back out with the same meal tray. Isolation cart with gowns and gloves inside of cart observed located outside of R9 and R107s' room. Contact isolation signs documenting the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to answer a call light in a timely manner for 1 (R309) of 4 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: On 11/01/2022 at approximately 10:25 am, surveyor located outside of R309's room. Surveyor observed V28 (R309's family) standing in the doorway of R309's room with the door open. Surveyor observed that R309 was lying in bed with the call light audibly alarming and illuminating, indicating that R309's call light was turned on. V28 stated R309 turned the call light on about 5 minutes ago and no one has come to answer it yet. I went to the nurses station to inform V9 (Agency LPN #1) that R309 needs assistance. V9 told me that V14 (CNA) is the assigned CNA for R309 and V9 just sat back down at the nurses station. R309 has to use the bathroom. On 11/01/2022 at 10:26 am, surveyor now located inside of R309's room interviewing R309 and V28 (R309's family). Surveyor remained in R309's room for approximately 10 minutes while R309's call light continued to alarm. Surveyor observed that no one came into R309's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen therapy for one resident (R210). The facility also failed to properly label oxygen tubing with a date for six residents (R3, R310, R64, R312, R313, R127). The facility failed (a) to follow their policy and procedure and comprehensive care plan to ensure the correct oxygen flow rate was received as ordered by the physician for one resident (R123), and (b) to follow their policy and procedure to ensure humidifier bottle had at least an inch of water and was properly labeled for 1 (R123) of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: On 11/01/22 during the facility tour R210 was observed in bed receiving oxygen at 5 liters per nasal canula. R210 asked the surveyor what is the oxygen set on and the surveyor responded 5 liters. On 11/01/22 at 10:25 AM, observed R123 sitting up in chair alert and able to verbalize needs. Observed R123's using her (R123) oxygen concentrator and was set to 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to (a) properly date opened multi-dose inhalers for 4 residents (R35, R76, R73, R159); (b) properly discard multi-dose insulin pen after 28 days of opening for 1 resident (R104); and properly discard expired house stock medications on expiration date that could potentially affect all 20 residents residing on 4th floor team 1 from three of four medication carts inspected for medication storage and labeling. Findings include: On 11/01/2022 at 10:50 AM, inspected 4th floor medication cart team 2 with V17 (Registered Nurse). The following were noted: - R35's Symbicort inhaler without the date opened on the label. - R104's Novolog insulin pen with date opened 10/3/22 written on the label. On 11/01/2022 at 11:49 AM, inspected 4th floor medication cart team 1 with V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse). The following was noted: - 1 bottle of house stock Omeprazole 20mg medications with expiration date on the bottle that reads, 5/2022. V3 stated that expired medications should be discarded and not kept in the medication cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess/monitor one resident (R38) for self-administration of medication out of a sample of 31 residents reviewed. Findings include: On 11/01/2022 at 10:50 am, surveyor observed R38 located sitting in a wheelchair inside of R38's room next to R38's bedside table. Surveyor observed 4 unidentified oblong shaped pills inside of a medication cup on R38's bedside table. R38 stated V9 (Agency LPN #1) left my pills here because V9 knew that I was going to take my medication when I came back in my room. On 11/01/2022 at 10:53 am, V9 located inside of R38's room and observed R38's medication on R38s' bedside table. V9 stated I just sat those pills there because I knew that R38 was going to take them later. R38 always take R38's pills later, R38 takes R38's own time to take R38's medication, that's just how R38 is. On 11/03/2022 at 10:03 am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated In order for a resident to be able to self-medicate, first the resident should be alert and oriented x3. Then the resident is visually observed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure and the comprehensive care plan to ensure incontinence care was provided for a dependent incontinent resident in a timely manner for 1 (R71) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care in a sample of 31. Findings include: On 11/01/22 at 11:16 AM, R71 was observed lying in bed on her (R71) night gown. Noted with bilateral upper extremities contractures. Alert and able to verbalize needs. R71 stated, I'm really really wet. I need to be changed. The last time they changed my diaper was at 1:00 AM. Nobody has checked on me since then. Surveyor immediately asked V18 (Memory Care Director) to get assistance for R71. At 11:20 AM, V18 and V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant) entered R71's room to assist her (R71) with incontinence care. Observed R71's incontinence brief and underpad saturated with stool and urine. R71 stated, I'm wet all over. At 11:28 AM, an interview conducted with V19. V19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nursing services and care to ensure continuity of care for 1 resident (R309) out of a sample of 31 residents reviewed. Finding include: On 11/01/2022 at 10:35 am, R309 stated I was admitted to the facility last night around 6:30 pm. On 11/01/2022 at 12:44 pm, surveyor asked V9 (Agency LPN #1) who is the nurse that is assigned to care for R309 residing in room [ROOM NUMBER]. V9 then stated There are no residents residing in room [ROOM NUMBER]. I am assigned to care for the residents residing in rooms 305-312. On 11/01/2022 at 12:45 pm, V10 (Agency LPN #2) stated I am assigned to care for the residents residing in rooms 301, 302-1, and 324-329. On 11/01/2022 at 12:47 pm, V11 (Agency LPN #3) states When I first started my shift today, the supervisor did not tell me that I am assigned to care for R309 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. According to my census, there are no residents located in room [ROOM NUMBER]. V11 then shows surveyor a facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess/document a blood pressure assessment and failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the residents' physician for one (R309) resident out of a sample of 31 residents reviewed. Findings Include: On 11/01/2022 at 10:35 am, R309 stated I have not received my morning medication and it is almost 11 o'clock. On 11/01/2022 at 12:42 pm, V28 (R309s' family) stated R309 still has not received any medications. On 11/01/2022 at 1:07 pm, V9 (Agency LPN #1) located at the 3rd floor nurses station accessing the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) via computer. Surveyor observed residents' eMARs on V9s' computer and observed R309s' eMAR was red in color. On 11/01/2022 at 1:14 pm, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) located on the 3rd floor of the facility at the nurses station. Surveyor informed V2 that R309 has not received prescribed medications. On 11/01/2022 at 1:14 pm, V2 states to V9 R309 is your assigned resident to care for. You need to follow your eMAR because R309s' medication is assigned to your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy of diets & diet orders and failed to follow their food menu/mechanical soft diet for one resident (R20) reviewed for diets & diet orders in a sample of 6 residents. Findings include: R20 is an [AGE] year-old individual admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R20 has medical diagnosis including but not limited to: Dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. R20 is on Mechanical soft diet. On 11/01/2022 at 12:20 pm, R20 was observed in the dining room eating lunch. R20 was observed eating a toasted slice of garlic bread and R20 was observed trying to bite the bread. At 12:42 pm, R20 was observed coughing as R20 was eating toasted garlic bread. On 11/01/2022 at 12:35 pm, V7 (Activity aide) said that staff passing residents trays should check the food on resident tray to make sure what is on the resident tray matches the resident diet. V7 said V7 did not know which staff served R20's lunch. V7 was observed going to V7 and patting R20 as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy of food from outside for one of six residents (R62) reviewed for food from outside labeling in a sample of 6 residents. Findings include: On 11/02/2022 at 12:25 pm, R62 was observed in R62's room eating lunch. In R62's room was observed a small black fridge placed on a table next to the window. R62 said That is my food that my wife brings for me from home. R62 gave surveyor and V30 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) permission to check what was in R62's Fridge. On 11/02/2022 at 12:30 pm, V30 opened R62's fridge and inside R62's fridge was observed : o 1 black container with cooked oatmeal. No date when oatmeal was brought to R62, or when food should be eaten by. o 1 black container with cooked white rice. No date when rice was brought to R62, or when rice should be eaten by. o I clear cup with pineapple. No date when pineapple was brought to R62, or when pineapple should be eaten by. o Three cups pink lemonade. No date when lemonade was brought to R62, or when lemonade should be drank by. o 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$5,244 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $5,244 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 2.9 | +2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
The other 88 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 88; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOROS GENERATION TRUST U/A/D 1/3/12 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 12/14/2023 |
| GPN FAMILY TRUST U/A/D 4/28/08 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 12/14/2023 |
| OAKWAY OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 12% | since 12/14/2023 |
| RAJCHENBACH 2015 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 12/14/2023 |
| FORBRIGHT BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/14/2023 |
| KEIRO BUILDING, L.L.C. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 12/14/2023 |
| SHABAT, MENACHEM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/14/2023 |
| LEGACY HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/18/2025 |
| MANDAL, RONNIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/14/2023 |
| VICERE, ANTHONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/14/2023 |
| RSM US LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145775. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.