No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Warren Barr Lincoln Park

2732 North Hampden Court, Chicago, IL 60614 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 109 certified beds · (773) 248-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$117,488 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $117,488 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-25)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2800 N Sheridan Rd · (773) 525-8846 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2650 N Clark St · (773) 525-0179 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Go Grocer<0.1 mi
521 W Diversey Pkwy · (773) 270-5111 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Diversey and Stockton · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2700 N Pine Grove Ave · (773) 549-3362

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.5%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%6.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms96.9%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.1%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.1%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.6%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.6%21.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.9%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine54.6%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.6%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%13.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.812.021.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.842.221.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 136 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.4%CMS range 49.1–68.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.2–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge86.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.1–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
0.58
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.83
RN hoursweekends
51.2%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 82.9 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-21)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from physical abuse by staff. This failure affected one resident (R1) who was handled roughly and was hit on the arm and the back by a facility CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) as she attempted to redirect R1. This was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy which began on 06/30/24 when V20, Certified Nursing Assistant, physically abused R1. The immediacy was removed on 07/22/24. On 07/17/24, V1 (Administrator) was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy and the Immediate Jeopardy template was presented on 07/17/24 at 2:41pm. The facility provided an acceptable removal plan on 07/22/34 at 5:34pm. On 07/23/24, through onsite observation, interviews, and record reviews, the surveyor confirmed the implementation of facility's removal plan. Although the immediacy was removed and the removal plan accepted, the deficiency remains at the second level of harm until the facility can determine the effectiveness of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident with a history of falls. This failure affected one resident (R2)out of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision in the facility. As a result, R2 fell and sustained a laceration of the head requiring sutures.Findings Include:On 11/29/25 at 8:24 pm, an initial Facility Reported Incident was submitted to Illinois Department of Public health (IDPH) that documented, Around 11:25 am, a resident (R2) was observed lying on his back on the floor in the bathroom of his room. (R2's) fall was unwitnessed and resulted in (R2) having a laceration to the right forehead, that required (R2) to get two sutures. (R2) can stand and ambulate with a walker, cues, and standby assist. Resident primarily uses a wheelchair for mobility. The final report was submitted to IDPH on 12/5/25 at 3:50 pm. R2's diagnoses include but are not limited to syncope, collapse, falling, transient cerebral ischemic attack, hypertension, abnormal gait…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-21 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to display [NAME] information in a public and accessible location, informing residents of their right to explore or decline community transition, and their right to be free from retaliation, regardless of their decision on transition.These failures have the potential to affect all 85 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 11/18/2025 at 2:36 PM, V5 (Social Service Director) stated V30 ([NAME] agent) is the agent that works for [NAME] program. V5 submitted a list of six (6) residents with two (2) residents crossed out. V5 stated the 2 residents that were crossed out were already discharged , not through [NAME] program. V5 was asked if residents included on the list were being coordinated to V30 ([NAME] Agent). V5 stated she communicates with V30 including email communication. V5 was requested to submit email correspondence related to [NAME] Program and other document to support coordination between facility and V30. V5 was then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label and store food. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all 85 residents receiving food prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: On 11/18/2025 at 10:03AM, a tour of the kitchen was conducted with V20 (Food Service Manager). V20 and surveyor observed in the walk in-cooler, the following food items: - *1 open box of multiple heads of romaine lettuce that is wet and discolored a dark black color, with a receive date of 11/17/25.- * 1 open box of multiple heads of cabbage with discolored black spots on different areas of the cabbage leaves, with a receive date of 11/10/25.- * Multiple packages of ground beef meat inside a gray bin with a receive date of 11/17/2025, no use by date or expiration date labeled on the bin. V20 was observed removing the box of romaine lettuce from the cooler and stated the lettuce looks bad and believe it's molded already. V20 stated she has to discard the box of lettuce.V20 was observed removing the outer layers of the cabbage leaves, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer one resident with a known mental illness for a new level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screening. This failure affects one (R64) out of eight residents reviewed in a total sample of eighteen. Findings Include:According to the admission Record, R64 is [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of bipolar disorder with psychotic features, and major depression. On 11/20/25 at 10:55 AM, V28 (Admissions Director) stated R64's PASRR level I should be done prior to admission into the facility on 4/23/24 to determine if the nursing facility is able to meet R64's needs. V28 also stated R64's PASRR level I was incorrectly done in 2024 by the hospital, but the facility did not follow up until 11/18/25. The facility policy for PASARR Screening, dated 7/16/25, documents: The Medicaid-certified nursing facility will ensure that level I of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is completed either…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility to ensure resident was receiving nutrition via G-tube according to physician orders for 1 (R8) out of three residents reviewed for tube feeds in a sample of 18.Findings include:R8's face sheet documents R8 is a [AGE] year-old male with a medical diagnosis of gastrostomy malfunction. R8's physician order sheet documents: In the evening Enteral feeding- G-Tube type: Osmolite 1.5 Rate:70ml/hour, start at 5pm and infuse until 1540 ml total volume is reached per day. Turn off during Activity of daily living care and as needed and every shift. On 11/18/2025 at 11:35 PM, R8 had a G-tube that was not connected to tube feeding and not running. On 11/18/2025 at 2:00 PM, V29 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse/:PN) stated she is R8's nurse for today. V29 was asked, If (R8) has an order for G-tube feeding, what time do you start the feeding? V29 replied the evening nurse starts the feeding at 5:00 PM, and when it is empty by morning, she (V29) takes it down and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued medications are not administered and properly destroyed for 1 (R72) out of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 18. Findings Include:On 11/19/2025 at 10:34 AM during the medication pass, V24 (Registered Nurse, RN) opened the medication cart on the third floor, unlocked the narcotic medication bin, and dispensed a Tramadol 50 mg tablet. V24 was asked, What do the physician orders indicate as far as the medication dose, route and frequency? V24 logged in to the electronic medical record (EMR) and stated, I do not see an active order for (R72) to receive a Tramadol 50 mg tablet.On 11/19/2025 at 10:39 AM, V24 was asked what is the process for medication administration and what is the nurse required to do after narcotic medication has been discontinued per physician orders. V24 stated, I must complete a pain assessment, check the MAR (Medication Administration Record). I will call the Director of Nursing, and we will have to dispense this medication together. V24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued narcotics are removed and disposed of from the medication cart for one resident (R72) out of a sample of 3 resident's reviewed for medication storage and labeling on a total sample of 18 residents.Findings include:On 11/20/2025 at 10:32 AM, during medication pass, V24 (Registered Nurse/ RN) wasleaving medication cart on the third floor unlocked and unattended.On 11/20/2025 at 10:34 AM, V24 opened the medication cart on the third floor, unlocked the narcotic medication bin, and dispensed a Tramadol 50 mg tablet before checking to see if the medication was still active on the medication administration record (MAR). V24 was asked to verify the medication order. V24 logged in to the electronic medical record (EMR) and stated, The Tramadol 50 mg tablet is no longer an active order. V24 was asked what can potentially happen if a medication that has been discontinued remains in the medication cart. V24 stated, The nurse can administer the medication to the resident.On 11/20/2025 at 10:49 AM, V2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer vaccination to 3 out of 5 residents (R7, R86, R87) reviewed for vaccination related to infection prevention. Findings include: R7's immunization history documents the last time resident received influenza vaccination was on 11/13/2022. Pneumococcal vaccine was not administered, due to refusal, since 07/21/2023. No documentation was available for each vaccine that was offered for the current year 2025. R86's immunization record documents the last time resident received influenza vaccination was on 01/04/2025. Pneumococcal vaccination (PCV13) received on 01/22/2020. Clinical Management / Infection Prevention, dated 03/04/2025, reads: Adult 50 years and older recommends PCV15, PCV20 or PCV21 pneumococcal vaccination. R87's immunization record does not document the resident received pneumococcal vaccination. On 11/19/2025 at 10:34 AM, V6 (Infection Preventionist / Registered Nurse) stated she just started as an Infection Preventionist. V6 stated she still needs to address vaccination of some residents. Currently,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of records, the facility failed to document offering vaccination to 1 out of 5 residents (R87) reviewed for vaccination Findings include: R87's immunization record does not document the resident received or was offered Covid 19 vaccination. On 11/19/2025 at 10:34 AM, V6 (Infection Preventionist / Registered Nurse) statedshe just started as an Infection Preventionist. V6 stated she still needs to address vaccination of some residents. Currently, residents that do not have documentation as to their immunizations were not offered vaccination yet. V6 stated vaccination is a priority, the importance of vaccination is to protect them (residents) and protect people around residents from infection. Covid 19 Vaccination Policy, dated 07/16/2024:The facility will comply with the applicable CMS, CDC, and/or IDPH guidance on Covid 19 vaccination. The facility will offer Covid 19 vaccination to residents and document administration in the resident's record.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive and individualized care plan for a Stage IV pressure for one (R3) of four residents reviewed for improper nursing care. The findings include: R3's face sheet's showed admit date on 4/18/25, with diagnoses not limited to Encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue, Pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Essential (primary) hypertension, Disorder of prostate, Unspecified dementia. R3's health record showed discharge date on 8/1/25. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/7/2025, showed R3's cognition was intact. He needed Substantial / maximal assistance with eating, oral and personal hygiene; Dependent with toileting hygiene, shower / bathe self, upper and lower body dressing, chair / bed transfer. R3 was always Incontinent of bowel and bladder. MDS showed 1 Stage IV pressure ulcer that was present upon admission / entry.On 9/26/25 at 10:01 AM, V7 (Wound Care Coordinator, LPN / Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she has been working in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medication or controlled substance were accounted correctly as to recording compared to the actual medication per policy; failed to separate each medication during gastronomy tube administration; and failed to ensure insulin is available per physician order to avoid delay of administration. These failures affect 6 residents (R23, R2, R53, R127, R69, and R11) reviewed for medication administration. These failures affect 6 residents (R2, R11 R23, R53, R69, R127) in receiving proper pharmaceutical services. On [DATE], at 10:25 AM, V10 (Registered Nurse / Agency) gave a folder that includes narcotic record documents. A document titled Shift Change Accountability Record for Controlled Substances, dated [DATE], was not signed/initialed. V10 stated, I forgot to sign that narcotic medications were counted as correct. The nurse that will be leaving and the nurse that is incoming (V10) during change of shift need to count all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date and label insulins and eye drops per policy; failed to maintain medication carts free from insulin that were expired; failed to store controlled substances inside a double locked storage; and failed to maintain medication storage area free from controlled substance that was discontinued. These failures affect 6 residents (R19, R30, R2, R1, R53, and R3) reviewed for drug storage. Findings include: On [DATE] at 10:25 AM, with V10 (Registered Nurse / Agency), the following insulins were found: R19's Insulins Lispro had no date and Fiasp insulin had written as follows: date opened [DATE], and date expired was [DATE]. V10 stated it should not be in the medication cart because it was already expired. R30's insulins Lispro and Fiasp both had no date written. V10 stated, All of insulins are being used because it is inside the medication cart. It should have been dated when opened and the expiration date is 28 days after opening. R2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are accurately documented for eight (R8, R16, R26, R33, R53, R61, R127, R277) out of eight residents reviewed for resident records. Findings include: On 10/29/2024 at 11:30 AM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated, I believe there are 10 residents I am responsible for. Surveyor questioned V14 what room numbers she was responsible for. V14 voiced the room numbers she was assigned to. V14 stated she works from 7:00 AM until 3:00 PM. Surveyor questioned V14 on what her next duties/tasks she was going to carry out. V14 stated, I was waiting on the other lady to come in, so she can chart under my name, lunch is about to come, she doesn't have a log in. V14 reported she is just helping the lady out with the charting. Surveyor questioned V14 for the name of the person that doesn't have log in. V14 stated the other CNA is V15 (CNA). V14 stated, If the resident received care and it is documented, that is what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete one residents (R29) comprehensive annual assessment. Findings include: On 10/30/24 at 3:58 PM, V24 (Regional Director of Clinical Data Quality and Performance Audits) stated, Someone is covering MDS (Minimum Data Set) from another facility. On 10/30/24 at 4:25 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, We do not have a current MDS Coordinator. On 10/31/24 at 9:10 AM, V19 (MDS Consultant) stated, (R29's) Census, 5/18/2024, is an error. (R29) went to the hospital and was admitted and returned with qualifying nights at the hospital. (R29) came back to the facility as dual (Medicaid and Medicare payor). MDS is scheduled in sequence. The census line has an error. The submitted MDS on 10/17/24, was a quarterly assessment, modified to be inactivated. MDS annual created it to be finalized on 10/31/24, with the same ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of the submitted MDS (10/17/24). Census drives the MDS. Assessments are in sequence. A quarterly was sent. The type of assessment was an error. We inactivated the quarterly and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a new Level I screen for one (R70) resident reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASARR) in a total sample of 21. Findings include: R70's Facesheet documents R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R70's Level I PASARR outcome documents R70 has an exempted hospital discharge, with a 30-day length of stay that expired on [DATE]. On [DATE], at 2:19 PM, V1 (Administrator) states the facility checks to see if a resident has a PASARR screening upon admission. V1 states the PASARR indicates the determination of needs/DON score for the individual resident. V1 states based on the DON score, it is determined if a resident is appropriate for the nursing home setting or not. V1 states she is unaware of the DON score ranges or what the different DON score ranges are indicative of. V1 states a PASARR Level II is needed for a resident if it is determined that the resident has an SMI/severe mental illness. V1 states the determination…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address a high blood sugar result for 1 out of 3 residents (R75) reviewed for blood sugar testing. Findings include: R75 was [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE], in the facility with medical diagnosis that includes diabetes mellitus. V25 (Registered Nurse) progress notes, dated [DATE], reads R75 expired in the facility pronounced expired by EMS (Emergency Medical Service) at 3:15 PM. Also on the same progress notes, at 2:31 PM, R75's blood sugar was obtained, with 397 result. Per physician order, R75 was receiving Paxlovid medication for Covid-19 from [DATE] to [DATE]. There was an order to check R75's blood sugar before meals and at bedtime, and to call the MD (Medical Doctor) if blood sugar result is below 60 or above 300. R75's MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated [DATE], R75's blood sugar result was scheduled at 11:00 AM. R75's result was 33,3 which was above 300 that per physician order to call physician. Review of all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer preventative measures were accurately applied for two residents (R4 and R62) in a sample of 18 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer. Findings include: 1. R4's POS (Physician Order Summary) has active order, Patient to be on low air loss mattress at all times daily, afterrnoon, and every shift for pressure reduction, order date 8/27/24. On 10/29/24 at 12:40 PM, R62 was lying in bed on a low air loss. A fitted sheet was on the mattress, and a flat sheet folded two times was between R62 and the mattress. On 10/29/24 at 12:45 PM, V2 verified there was a fitted sheet, a flat sheet folded two times, and R62 was wearing a brief. 2. R62's POS has active order, Patient on LAL (Low Air Loss) mattress at all times every shift for pressure reduction. Order date 9/23/24. On 10/29/24 at 1:00 PM, R4 was lying in bed on a low air loss mattress. A fitted sheet was on the mattress. On 10/29/24 at 1:05 PM, V22 verified there was a fitted sheet, a flat sheet folded two times used as a draw sheet, and R4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy on resident food preferences for one (R70) resident in a total sample of 21 residents reviewed. Findings include: R70's Nutrition Progress Note, dated 10/20/2024, documents in part, Review of diet tolerance, PO (by mouth) intakes, appetite changes, weights, labs, medications, skin conditions. Recommend: Continue current diet, provide food preferences, provide foods from alternative menu, provide assistance with meals as needed, closely monitor diet tolerance, PO intakes, labs, and weights. Continue Pro Stat three times daily to maintain skin integrity. Will continue to monitor and make changes as necessary. Facility menu documents eggs were served in the facility for breakfast on 10/27/24, and 10/28/24. On 10/29/2024, at 11:50 AM, R70 stated the facility staff continues to serve her eggs on her meal trays for breakfast although she has informed the facility that she does not like eggs to eat. R70 states she has informed the Dietary Manager (identified as V8) of her dislike for eggs, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) worn by staff caring for a resident with a known infectious disease (R50), and failed to ensure staff maintains clean technique/infection control practice while performing a bed bath (R3) for one resident. These failures affect 2 residents (R3 and R50) reviewed for infection prevention and control in a total sample of 21 residents reviewed. Findings include: 1. R50's physician order sheet/POS, dated 10/21/2024, documents R50 is on contact isolation precautions for shingles. On 10/29/2024, at 11:41 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated R50 is on contact isolation in the facility due to R50 being diagnosed with shingles. On 10/29/2024, at 11:48 PM, surveyor observed a sign posted on R50's door that reads, Contact Precautions Everyone Must: clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff must also: Put on gloves before room entry. Discard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication was locked up safely when not in visual proximity of the licensed nurses and not in use to prevent tampering and accidental hazard. This failure has the potential to affect all the residents residing on the 2nd and 3rd floor of the facility. Findings include: On 07/10/24 at 11:29am, the treatment cart was observed in the hallway on the 3rd floor, not in visual proximity of the nurse, and was unlocked. V16, RN (Registered Nurse) was asked about the facility policy/protocol on treatment carts storage and medication storage. V16 stated the medications are to be locked in a cart when not in use and not in visual proximity of a nurse. V16 stated, I did not put it there so I was not watching to see whether it is locked or not. You will have to ask the treatment nurse (referring to V18 (Wound Care Nurse) why the cart was left unlocked. On 7/10/24 at 11:31am, V18, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) Wound Care Nurse, stated, The wound care cart (treatment cart) should be locked because the treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) within required time, the allegation of abuse of one of four residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. This failure affected R1 who was handled roughly and was hit on the arm and back by a facility staff as an attempt to redirect R1. Findings include: R1's medical record documented R1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that includes but not limited to Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere mild with agitation, insomnia due to medical condition, essential hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 07/10/24 at 3:00pm, V20, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), stated, I will tell you the truth, it happened about two weeks ago, and the whole thing was in the hallway where the video camera can pick it up (see it). V20 checked the calendar of the day she worked and stated the incident happened on 06/30/24. V20 stated, (R1) was trying to sit on the floor. (R1) usually does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately initiate an investigation into an alleged physical abuse for one of four residents (R1) in the sample reviewed for physical abuse. This failure affected R1 who was handled roughly and was physically hit in the arm and back by a staff to redirect R1. Findings include: R1's medical record documented R1 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that includes but not limited to dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere mild with agitation, insomnia due to medical condition, essential hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 07/10/24 at 2:50pm, V20, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), stated, I will tell you the truth. It happened about two weeks ago, and the whole thing was in the hallway where the video camera can pick it up (see it). V20 checked the calendar for the day she worked and stated the incident happened on 06/30/24. (R1) was trying to sit on the floor. (R1) usually does this, and when I was trying to grab (R1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication is administered as ordered for one resident (R3) for residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R3's MAR (Medication Administration Record) and POS (Physician Order Sheet) showed an order for Potassium chloride crys ER 20 meq tablet extended release give 20 [NAME] by mouth one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for supplement. The MAR showed R3 was administered this medication on 07/10/24, a Wednesday, and should not have been given any potassium on 07/11/24. On 07/11/24 at 11:45am, R3 was observed in bed, with two plastic medication cups on the over bed table. One had a big whitish pill and the second cup had six medications. R3 asked the surveyor to identify the pills. R3 stated, I am stressed because I have been calling the nurse and the nurse will not help me. I don't know what this big pill is. V16, RN (Registered Nurse) stated they were R3's morning scheduled medications, and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy on enteral tube feeding care by failing to label the date and time the feeding was started for two (R2, R3) residents of three residents reviewed for enteral feedings. Findings include: 1. R2's medical diagnoses in current face sheet includes: cerebral infarction due to embolism of bilateral posterior cerebral arteries, encounter for attention to gastrostomy, and cognitive communication deficit. R2's Diet: NPO (Nothing by Mouth) diet, NPO texture, NPO consistency and her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 5/3/24 is documented as 6/15, indicating R2 has severe cognitive impairment. R2's Physician's orders, dated 04/26/2024, document: Enteral Feed Order every shift Enteral feeding G-Tube feeds with Jevity1.5 at 75ml/hour. Start at 17:00 and infuse until 1575ml is reached per day. On 5/6/2024 at 10:20am, R2 was observed sleeping with head of bed elevated to about 75 degrees, and R2's nutritional supplement was observed running at a rate of 75mL/hour. The pump showed R2 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a.) food items were properly stored per manufacturer guidelines, b.) expired foods were discarded, and c.) proper hand washing was done in between handling dirty and clean plate ware. These failures have the potential to affect all 77 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 9:15 AM, during initial kitchen tour, V10 (Food Service Manager) stated all food items in the refrigerator should be labeled with a delivery date, an open data, and an expiration date or use by date. V10 stated all items should be discarded after labeled use by date. On 12/12/23 at 9:20 AM, walk-in refrigerator had a container of opened package of French Toast labeled, with preparation date 12/08/23, and use by date 12/10/23. V10 stated this item would not be served to a resident because it is past its use by date. V10 stated I'll throw it out now. On 12/12/23 at 9:32 AM, V11 (Dietary Aide) was handling dirty plate ware, and placing dirty items into a dish rack before feeding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored in 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This affects 4 residents (R54, R3, R64, and R68) reviewed for medication storage. Findings Include: 1. R54 has diagnoses of Asthma and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. R54's Order Summary Report, dated 12/13/23, documents: Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol 160-4.5 MCG/ACT 2 puff inhale orally every 12 hours. R54's Care Plan documents: Focus: R54 has Asthma. Intervention: Give medications as ordered (Budesonide Inhaler). Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. 2. R3 has diagnoses not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Disorders of Electrolyte and Fluid Balance, and Urinary Tract Infection. R3's Order Review Report, dated 12/12/23, documents: Insulin Glargine Solution 100 UNIT/ML 25 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for diabetes. Humalog Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) 3 unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for infection prevention and control by: 1. Failed to ensure that proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) such as N95 mask is worn by staff during COVID outbreak in the affected area. 2. Failed to ensure that a sign will be provided outside the room for residents on transmission-based precautions indicating the type of the precaution for 5 residents (R9, R14, R60, R68, R274). 3. Failed to follow enhanced barrier precaution policy and procedures for resident (R68) with PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line. These failures affect 5 residents (R9, F14, R68, R274, and R60), and could potentially affect 23 residents residing on 3rd floor for facility's census, dated 12/12/23, reviewed for infection control. The findings include: 1. R9's health record documented admission, dated 3/9/2020, with diagnoses not limited to Covid-19, Spinal stenosis, lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, Mixed hyperlipidemia, Personal history of covid-19, Generalized anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: (1) provide eligible residents and/or resident representatives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of all available pneumococcal and Influenza vaccinations; (2) assess eligibility and offer Influenza vaccination to 2 (R9, R68) residents; and (3) assess eligibility and offer pneumococcal vaccinations to 4 (R9, R60, R68 and R274) residents. These failures affect 4 (R9, R60, R68 and R274) of 5 residents reviewed for pneumococcal / influenza vaccinations. The findings include: 1. R9's health record documented admission date of 3/9/2020, with diagnoses not limited to Covid-19, Spinal stenosis, lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, Mixed hyperlipidemia, Personal history of covid-19, Generalized anxiety disorder, Major depressive disorder, single episode, Chronic kidney disease stage 3b, Unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, Essential (primary) hypertension,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were treated with respect and dignity by not passing out meals to residents sitting at a table at the same time. These failures affected 1 resident (R70) reviewed during dining in a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: R70's diagnosis which includes but not limited to End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications, Hypertension, Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Anemia In Chronic Kidney Disease, Malignant Neoplasm Of Sigmoid, History Of Falling, Unspecified Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Pressure Ulcer Of Sacral Region, Stage 3. R70's Physician Orders, dated 12/12/23, documents Regular diet, ordered 12/08/23, and resident sent out to ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation of aggressive behavior, dated 11/30/23. R70's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 11/17/23 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 13 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. R70's nutrition care plan, dated 12/11/23, documents, (R70) is at high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 (R60) resident reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 19. Findings Include: R60 has diagnoses not limited to Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) Resistance, Major Depressive Disorder, Insomnia, Hallucinations, Dementia in other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Mild, with other Behavioral Disturbance, Acute on Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3, Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Lobar Pneumonia, and Acute Cough. R60's Care Plan documents: Intervention: Keep call light within reach when in bedroom or bathroom Date Initiated: 12/08/23. Focus: (R60) has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care deficits r/t (related/to) decline in ADL functions. Resident needs staff assistance to safely complete ADL task r/t cognitive impairment, confusions, poor balance, limited mobility and decrease activity endurance. Intervention: CALL LIGHT: Call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Physician's order with the code status for 2 (R14, R66) of 2 residents reviewed for Advance Directives in a sample of 19. Findings Include: 1. R66 has diagnosis not limited to Acute on Chronic Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrilelation, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Right Axillary Vein, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Acute and Chronic Postprocedural Respiratory Failure, Personal History of Pneumonia, Cardiomyopathies, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. R66's Care Plan documents: Focus: (R66) Advance Directive Status (Code Status: Full Code) Pursuant to resident rights, personal choices, and the individual's desire to retain control and autonomy over his health care decisions, the individual (or representative) has been educated on Advance Health Care (including end of life care) options. Date Initiated: 11/25/23. Intervention: As indicated, document the code status on the Physician's Order Sheet (POS) in the EMR system Date Initiated: 11/25/23. Order Summary Report has no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered oral nutritional supplements. This failure affected 2 residents (R23, R34) of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: On 12/12/23 during initial kitchen tour conducted between 9:15-9:56 AM, observed cases of Magic Cup supplement stored in the reach-in freezer. 1. R34's diagnosis includes but not limited to Unspecified Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Alzheimer's Disease, Major Depressive Disorder with Severe Psychotic Symptoms, Schizophrenia, and Unspecified Bipolar Disorder. R34's Order Review Report, dated 12/12/23, documents in part Magic Cup three times per day, ordered on 10/11/22. R34's MDS (Minimum Data Set) from 12/07/23 indicates BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was not conducted. R34 is rarely/never understood. R34's nutrition care plan, dated 12/05/23, documents R34 is at risk for compromised nutritional status related to diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and R34 has experienced weight loss. Interventions include but not limited to Magic Cup three times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct oxygen flow rate as ordered for 2 (R4, R66) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 19. Findings Include: 1. R66 has diagnoses not limited to Acute on Chronic Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Right Axillary Vein, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Acute and Chronic Postprocedural Respiratory Failure, Personal History of Pneumonia, Cardiomyopathies, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Order Review Report, dated 12/12/23, documents: Oxygen 2L (Liters)/min (Minute) via nasal cannula to maintain Oxygen Saturation level equal or above 92% as needed for SOB (Shortness of Breath). R66's Care Plan documents Focus: R66 is at risk for alteration in respiratory functioning related to CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), Acute on Chronic respiratory failure, Hx (History) of pneumonia and Hx of R (Right) Hydropneumothorax s/p…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their fall policy and R5's comprehensive care plan to prevent further falls for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: R5's face sheet documents medical diagnoses of lack of coordination and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R5's Fall Risk Evaluation, dated 7/29/2023, documents R5 is at high risk for falls. R5's Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 10/28/2023, documents R5 requires partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene and toilet transfer. R5's comprehensive care plan contains a focus that documents R5 is at high risk for falls related to history of falls, Parkinson's Disease, poor safety awareness, poor balance, coordination, limited mobility, and decreased activity endurance. R5 also continues to over-estimate functional limitation. Intervention initiated on 8/23/2022 documents in part: Staff to address [R5's] needs with a prompt response to all requests for assistance. V8's (Nurse) progress note, dated 11/05/2023 at 1:53 PM, documents: The resident fell on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and records review, the facility failed to follow their policy on resident food preferences for one (R6) of four residents reviewed. Findings include: R6 is a [AGE] year-old individual, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6's medical diagnoes include but are not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, unspecified, and mixed hyperlipidemia. R6's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score, dated [DATE], documents R6's score as 15/15, indicating R6's cognation is intact. On 10/05/2023 on 10:00am, R6 said she does not get her boiled egg each morning, which she prefers, despite requesting for it each day. R6 further stated she has received the boiled egg only once, and even today she did not receive one. On 10/05/2023 10:55am, V5(Food Services Director) said she met R6 about two weeks ago, and R6 told her of her food preferences, including boiled egg/s for breakfast, no sweeteners, no canned foods. V5 said today's breakfast was baked egg with cheese and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$117,488 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $117,488 — penalty dated 2024-07-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 88 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avantara ArrowheadRapid City, SD 1 of 5Avantara Evergreen ParkEvergreen Park, IL 1 of 5Avantara MilbankMilbank, SD 1 of 5Avantara Saint CloudRapid City, SD 1 of 5Avantara WatertownWatertown, SD 1 of 5Emmetsburg Care CenterEmmetsburg, IA 1 of 5Grove Of Elmhurst, TheElmhurst, IL 1 of 5Harmony Cedar RapidsCedar Rapids, IA 1 of 5Harmony House Health Care CenterWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Harmony MarshalltownMarshalltown, IA 1 of 5Harmony WaterlooWaterloo, IA 1 of 5Harmony West Des MoinesWest Des Moines, IA 1 of 5Nexus at BerwynBerwyn, IL 1 of 5Northgate Care CenterWaukon, IA 1 of 5Park View Rehabilitation CenterSac City, IA 1 of 5Southfield Wellness CommunityWebster City, IA 1 of 5Warren Barr South LoopChicago, IL 2 of 5Avantara GrotonGroton, SD 2 of 5Avantara HuronHuron, SD 2 of 5Avantara Lincoln ParkChicago, IL 2 of 5Avantara Mountain ViewRapid City, SD 2 of 5Avantara Palos HeightsPalos Heights, IL 2 of 5Avantara PierrePierre, SD 2 of 5Avantara RedfieldRedfield, SD 2 of 5Bella Terra BloomingdaleBloomingdale, IL 2 of 5Bella Terra Morton GroveMorton Grove, IL 2 of 5Carlton At The Lake, TheChicago, IL 2 of 5Chalet Living & RehabChicago, IL 2 of 5Colonial Manor of ElmaElma, IA 2 of 5Hallmark Care CenterMount Vernon, IA 2 of 5Harmony DavenportDavenport, IA 2 of 5Harmony DubuqueDubuque, IA 2 of 5Harmony PalosPalos Heights, IL 2 of 5Harmony Utica RidgeDavenport, IA 2 of 5Heritage Care And Rehabilitation CenterMason City, IA 2 of 5Manor House Care CenterSigourney, IA 2 of 5Peterson Park Health Care CtrChicago, IL 3 of 5Avantara LibertyvilleLibertyville, IL 3 of 5Avantara NorthRapid City, SD 3 of 5Bloomfield Care CenterBloomfield, IA

Showing 40 of 88; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DOROS GENERATION TRUST U/A/D 1/3/12Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 05/03/2017
GPN FAMILY TRUST U/A/D 4/28/08Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 05/03/2017
LINCOLN PARK PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/06/2015
VNB NEW YORK LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/07/2025
SHABAT, MENACHEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/03/2017
LEGACY HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/06/2015
BATT, ELCHONONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/28/2024
MUBARAK, TARIQIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
ROTH & CO, LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-24.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 21%Medicare 10%Other / private 69%

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$404per resident / day
operating cost
$12,288per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$324per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145875. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next