Whitehall Of Deerfield

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,668 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 697 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.93 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 190 beds and averages 132.3 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.34 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.70 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.34 to 1.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident at high risk for falls for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 3.The findings include:R3's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 4/29/26 shows that she is at high risk for falls. R3's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows that her cognition is impaired and requires substantial/maximal assistance to sit to stand, transfer and walk.R3's Incident Report dated 4/29/26 shows, At 2:30 AM patient is sleeping comfortable in bed resting, and when medication pass was for her at around 5:15, nurse observed patient on the floor, head towards the foot of the bed.Resident unable to give description.R3's Fall Care Plan shows an intervention initiated on 5/6/26 for: Please keep high floor mats in place on both sides of bed as appropriate- date initiated 4/29/2026.On 5/6/26 at 11:10 AM, R3 was laying in bed. R3 did not have fall mats next to her bed or in her room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene and wore and/or changed personal protective equipment (PPE) in a manner to prevent potential exposure to and transmission of contagious diseases. These failures have the potential to affect all 151 residents living in the facility.The findings include:The facility's Facility Data Sheet dated 1/20/26 shows their current census is 151.The facility's 1st Floor Census sheet dated 1/20/26 shows R2, R3, and R4 are each positive for COVID-19.The facility's Isolation Tracking sheet dated 1/19/26 shows R2 tested positive for COVID-19 on 1/14/26, R3 tested positive for COVID-19 on 1/17/26 and R4 tested positive for COVID-19 on 1/16/26. They were each placed on contact/droplet isolation on the day they tested positive.On 1/20/26 at 10:40 AM, V10, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), went to R2's room wearing a surgical mask. V10 then put a N95 mask over the surgical mask along with other PPE (gloves, face shield, and gown) and entered R2's room. R2's room was marked with a sign for N95…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure facility recipes were followed. This has the potential to effect all residents receiving food from the kitchen. The findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form 671 shows there are 131 residents residing in the facility. Facility provided list of residents that have an order of NPO (Nothing by Mouth) show there are three residents with an order of NPO that do not receive food from the kitchen. Facility provided menu week at a glance shows on 4/21/25 the noon meal includes beef barley soup, turkey and Swiss cheese sandwich, three bean salad, and mandarin oranges. 1. On 4/21/25 9:48 AM, dietary staff were seen scooping three bean salad from a bulk container into portion cups for the noon meal. The staff member was using a 4 ounce (oz) slotted spoodle with a green handle. On 4/21/25 at 11:20 AM, the mandarin orange portion in the portion cups being placed on resident trays appeared small. On 4/21/25 at 12:02 PM, V3 (Food Service Director) measured both the mandarin orange and three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe food handling procedures were being practiced. This has the potential to effect all residents receiving food from the kitchen. The findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form 671 shows there are 131 residents residing in the facility. Facility provided list of residents that have an order of NPO (Nothing by Mouth) show there are three residents with an order of NPO that do not receive food from the kitchen. 1. On 4/21/25 at 9:53 AM, V4 (Dietary Aide) and V5 (Dietary Aide) were breaking down breakfast trays on one side of the dirty side of the dish machine counter. V6 (Dietary Aide) was wearing gloves and was placing plates, utensils, trays, and other items into dish racks and running them through the dish machine on the opposite side of the dish machine counter from V4 and V5. V6 went over to the clean and sanitized of the dish machine, moved dish racks out of the way to allow more dish racks to run through the dish machine, then went to the sink attached to the dirty side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure insulin pens and tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) were labeled with open and with expiration dates, and failed to ensure medications were stored securely for 5 of 10 residents ( R78, R16, R384, R385 and R386) reviewed for medication labeling/storage in the sample of 27. The findings include: On [DATE] at 11:03 AM, in the 2nd floor medication cart there were 2 insulin pens open that were not dated and 1 insulin pen that had expired on [DATE]. These were identified as flextouch insulin pens belonging to R78 which included one expired pen and one unlabeled pen, and a unlabeled Humalog kwik pen belonging to R16. At 11:03 AM while checking the medication cart V10 (Registered Nurse/ RN) said insulin pens should be labeled when they are opened and have the expiration date also, which would be 28 days later. V10 said all expired pens or medications should be immediately removed from the medication cart and disposed of. On [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were in place and failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene in a manner to prevent cross contamination for five of 27 residents (R30, R51, R383, R382, R376) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 27. The findings include: 1. R30's admission Record dated April 22, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, osteomyelitis, cognitive communication deficit, pressure injury of sacral region, and attention to gastrostomy (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube/feeding tube/G tube). R30's Order Summary Report shows she has an indwelling catheter drainage bag and has a wound dressing change to her sacrum. R30's orders do not include an order for enhanced barrier precautions. R30's Care Plan initiated on February 20, 2025 shows, [R30] is on enhanced barrier precaution related to g-tube. On April 22, 2025 at 11:20 AM, R30 was observed in her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner for one of 27 residents (R51) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 27. The findings include: R51's admission Record shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, pneumonitis, difficulty in walking, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia, depression, and anxiety disorder. On April 21, 2025 at 12:17 PM during the lunch meal, R51 was sitting in his high back recliner. V21 Activity Coordinator was standing in front of R51 spooning thickened liquids and pureed food into R51's mouth. V21 was not sitting down within eye to eye level of R51. On April 23, 2025 at 9:13 AM, V1 Administrator said staff should be sitting down while feeding residents so they are able to engage with the residents. V1 said an inservice was provided to staff in regards to sitting while feeding residents. The facility's Privacy and Dignity Policy revised August 16, 2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor weights for a resident with weight loss and failed to apply compression stockings for a resident with a history of blood clots which applies to 2 of 2 residents (R96, R5) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 27. The findings include: 1. R96's Facesheet printed on 4/23/25 showed R96 is an eighty-three year old female resident readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay on 3/24/25 with diagnoses which included: Parkinson's disease, acute post hemorrhagic anemia, stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer, dysphagia, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and malignant neoplasm of pancreas. R96's medical record showed a readmission weight of 160 pounds on 3/24/25. R96's previous weight of 2/8/25 was 171 pounds. This is a 6.4% difference. On 4/21/25 R96's weights were reviewed. These were the only 2 weights in R96's vitals section. R96's Order Summary Report printed on 4/22/25 showed an order for weekly weights to be done every Monday. The order start date is 3/24/25. On 4/22/25 at 1:46 PM, V18 Clinical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were in place for residents at risk for developing pressure injuries for three of six residents (R276, R26, R51) reviewed for pressure injuries in a sample of 27. The findings include: 1. R276's Facesheet printed on 4/22/25 showed R276 is an eighty-five year old male resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include: type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, unstageable sacral pressure ulcer, and needing assistance with personal care. R276's Braden Skin Assessment summary printed on 4/23/25 showed R276 has been at High Risk for developing pressure injuries since his initial assessment on 4/10/25. On 4/21/25 at 11:20 AM and 1:20 PM R276 was lying in with his legs/heels directly on the mattress. On 4/22/25 at 9:50 AM R276 was in the same possition with no heel offloading devices in place. R276's legs had reddened areas along the calf area. R276 stated the reddened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent a contracture from getting worse for one of 27 residents (R69) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 27. The findings include: R69's admission Record shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, and pressure injury of sacral region. R69's facility obtained picture shows that R69 had a rolled wash cloth to his left contracted hand. On April 21, 2025 at 10:08 AM, 10:52 AM, and 1:11 PM R69's left hand was contracted and bent up on his chest. There were no devices in place to R69's contracted hand. On April 23, 2025 at 9:13 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) said R69 should have a rolled washcloth in place to his contracted hand. V2 said the rolled wash cloth is used to help prevent further injury to his left hand. The facility's Restorative Nursing Program revised August 19, 2024 shows, Appropriate nursing and restorative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL