Avantara Long Grove

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 268 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 195 beds and averages 176.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify a fall for a resident with a history of falling and failed to implement their fall policy for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety/supervision in the sample of 3. The findings include: On 1/22/25 at 9:41 AM, R2 had self-propelled from the dining room area, in her wheelchair. R1 was in the dining room, watching R2 leave. R1 had a clothing protector on his chest, and it fell to the floor. R1 was in a high back wheelchair, with no foot pedals. R1 reached forward and tried to pick up the clothing protector from the floor. There was not a staff member inside the dining room area. V4 (RN -Registered Nurse) was at the medication cart, outside the dining room, looking down. R1 continued to reach for the clothing protector and his buttocks came off the seat of his wheelchair. The surveyor informed V4 (RN) that R1 was reaching for something on the floor and was concerned he may fall. V4 instructed R1 to stop reaching and stated, He's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of accidental hazards by not removing razors from the room of residents with dementia and within reach of residents that have dementia that wander. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R49 & R120) reviewed for safety in the sample of 32 and 8 residents (R79, R96, R103, R109, R119, R127, R142, & R149) outside of the sample. The findings include: On 8/6/24 at 12:51 PM, in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a disposable razor in a clear plastic bag on the mirror ledge. The safety cover was off of the dry razor. R49 was one of two residents that resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 8/7/24 at 9:45 AM, in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a disposable razor in a clear plastic bag on the mirror ledge. The safety cover was off of the dry razor. The Face Sheet dated 8/7/24 for R49 showed diagnoses including dementia, delirium, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, lack of coordination, congestive heart failure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure bedtime snacks were offered to residents for 3 of 3 residents (R58, R112, and R526) reviewed for bedtime snacks in the sample of 32 and one resident (R1) outside of the sample. The findings include: R58's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include generalized osteoarthritis, anemia in other chronic diseases, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, and depression. R58's August 2024 Physician Order Sheet showed, 8/5/23 Offer Bedtime Snack. R58's Nutrition-Snacks documentation for the last 30 days was reviewed and showed he was offered a snack two times. R526's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include seizures, dysphagia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and hypertensive heart disease. R526's August 2024 Physician Order Sheet showed, 7/26/24 Offer Bedtime Snack. R526's Nutrition-Snacks documentation since admission to the facility was reviewed and showed no snacks offered.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement contact isolation precautions for a resident (R95) with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), failed to wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for 3 residents (R31, R11, R154) on enhanced barrier precautions, and failed to perform glove changes during incontinence care for 1 resident (R154). These failures apply to 4 of 9 residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 32. The findings include: 1. R95's electronic face sheet printed on 8/8/24 showed R95 has diagnoses including but not limited to fracture of head and neck of right femur, sepsis, osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, flaccid hemiplegia, post laminectomy syndrome, and cord compression. R95's physician's orders dated 8/1/24 showed, Isolation: contact precautions, reason for isolation MRSA sacral wound. R95's care plan dated 4/13/24 showed, (R95) is on isolation. Contact isolation due to MRSA of sacral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dignity during personal cares for 2 of 2 residents (R31, R97) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 32. The findings include: 1. R31's electronic face sheet printed on 8/8/24 showed R31 has diagnoses including but not limited to multiple sclerosis, pressure ulcer of left buttock unstageable, non-pressure chronic ulcer of right heel and midfoot, major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and dysphagia. R31's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R31 has mild cognitive impairment. On 8/6/24 at 10:26AM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) provided incontinence care to R31. R31 was rolled onto her left side with her buttocks uncovered, facing the window. R31's window had clear exposure to the parking lot where people could be seen walking by vehicles within view of R31's window. V13 stated, We don't close her blinds because she doesn't like the dark room. Normally we would but for her we don't. R31 then stated, It bothers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain weights as ordered by a physician for 1 of 2 residents (R34) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 32. The findings include: R34's electronic face sheet printed on 8/8/24 showed R34 has diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, hypertensive heart disease, and heart failure. R34's physician's orders dated 3/26/21 showed, Weekly weights: monitor for increased edema notify MD for weight gain of 5lbs in a week. R34's monitor record showed R34's weight was not obtained on 7/19/24, 7/28/24, and 8/2/24. R34's care plan dated 4/5/24 showed, Risk for fluctuating weights: (R34) has the following conditions and risk factors that put them at risk for fluctuating weights: diuretic use and diagnosis of heart failure .monitor weights per physician's orders. On 8/8/24 at 11:11AM, V11 (Clinical Care Coordinator) stated, Weights for residents are done on a monthly basis and as ordered by a physician. The nurses can see on the monitoring record when residents are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Observation, Interview, and Record Review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was not placed on a resident's bed or lifted above the level of the resident's bladder for 1 of 4 residents (R53) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 32. The findings include: On 8/7/24 at 1:52 PM, V4 CNA and V5 CNA went into R53's room to provide catheter care. V5 completed the catheter care and put a clean incontinence pad and incontinence brief under R53. V5 lifted the drainage bag and laid it on R53's bed. V4 picked up the drainage bag, held it up above the level of the resident's bladder as she moved the bag to his left side of the bed and attached it to the side rail. V4 and V5 adjusted the incontinence brief and incontinence pad under part of the resident's bottom. V5 turned R53 towards her. V4 unhooked the drainage bag from the side rail, lifted the drainage bag approximately a foot above the resident's bladder as she passed it over to V5 who attached the bag to his lower right side of the bed. V5 stated the drainage bag shouldn't be placed on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen as ordered by a physician for 3 of 4 residents (R34, R95, R519) reviewed for oxygen therapy in the sample of 32. The findings include: 1) R34's electronic face sheet printed on 8/8/24 showed R34 has diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, hypertensive heart disease, and heart failure. R34's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R34 receives oxygen therapy. R34's physician's orders dated 11/23/21 showed, Oxygen at 2L/min (liters per minute) via nasal cannula at bedtime. R34's care plan dated 7/1/19 showed, (R34) is on oxygen therapy related to ineffective gas exchange, heart failure. She is on oxygen continuous on 2L/min (liters per minute) via nasal cannula .give oxygen as ordered by the physician. On 8/6/24 at 10:18AM, R34 was in bed sleeping with her oxygen applied via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was set at 3 liters. On 8/8/24 at 10:57AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure physician prescribed medications were administered as ordered for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 32. The findings include: R1's face sheet printed on 8/8/24 shows diagnosis including but not limited to neuropathy, heart disease, asthma, schizoaffective disorder, dysphagia, gout, anemia, depression, pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus, and functional quadriplegia. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed no cognitive impairment or memory problems. On 8/6/24 at 11:04 AM, R1 was seated in a wheelchair in his room. Four medication cups were on the bedside table next to him. One cup contained a blue liquid, one contained three capsules, one contained a single blue tablet, and one contained six assorted colored tablets. R1 stated the nurse dropped those off a while ago. They are my 9:00 medicines. I asked her to just leave them. They do it all the time. R1's MAR (medication administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with eczema was assessed and treated in a timely manner. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 6. The findings include: On May 14, 2024, at 10:10 AM, R1 was lying in bed. The entire top of her head/scalp was dry with yellow/red crusty scabs. Her hair appeared greasy and/or wet. She stated, They say it's eczema on my head. It's been there for a while. On May 14, 2024, at 10:56 AM, V3 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated, R1's head has been like that for 2-3 months. They are not doing anything for it. She has been putting A&D ointment on it until R1's friend (V5 power of attorney of financial (POA)) brought her a medicated shampoo. She was washing her hair with regular shampoo, but it was drying it out more. She didn't know what it was on her head. It started off small and has gotten bigger. When she tries to scrape off the crusty scabs, R1 says it hurts so she doesn't scrub…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 89 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL