Warren Barr Oak Lawn

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 469 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 223 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.77 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 94% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 110.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to recognize an acute change in condition for a resident. This failure applied to one (R5) of three residents reviewed for nursing care and resulted in a delay in care for R5 who was hospitalized for respiratory failure. Findings include: R5 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include hydrocephalus, g-tube placement, communication deficit weakness and lack of coordination. Minimum data set (6/28/24) indicates R5 to have severe cognitive impairment and unable to make needs known to staff. The assessment data also includes that R5 is incontinent of bowel and bladder and totally dependent on staff for turning, repositioning and all other activities of daily living. On 7/15/24 at 12:51PM R5 was in the facility, observed by the Surveyor to be in bed, and appearing to be in respiratory distress. R5 was visibly and audibly gasping for air and respirations were counted at 47 breaths per minute. At 12:55PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement turning and repositioning to prevent the development of new pressure injuries and complete treatment orders. This failure affected two residents (R4 and R5) who were at high risk of developing pressure ulcers and resulted in R4 and R5 developing deep tissue injuries to the sacrum. Findings include: R4 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Protein-calorie Malnutrition, Heart failure, and metabolic encephalopathy. According to Skin Evaluation Assessment of 3/13/24, R4 was assessed to have one pressure ulcer of the right heel. Minimum Data Set (3/25/24) indicated R4 was cognitively impaired, incontinent of bowel and bladder and dependent on staff for turning, repositioning and toileting. R4 used a manual wheelchair, to which they were dependent on staff to transfer and maneuvers. R4 was able to feed self with set-up assistance from the staff. The mobility task for R4 was reviewed for March 2024.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that call lights were consistently within reach of residents (R23, R150, R64) and failed to ensure that wheelchairs were available for residents (R112 & R143) who were assessed to require them for mobility. This affected five residents (R23, R64, R150, R112, and R143) reviewed for accommodation of needs on the total sample of 43. Findings include: 1.On 4/14/26 at 10:05 AM, R23 was observed lying in bed. R23's call light cord was observed clipped to the cord at the wall. Call light was not within reach. On 4/14/26 at 10:30 AM, R150 was observed sitting in wheelchair next to bed. R150's call light cord was observed in-between R150's headboard and mattress and dangling three inches above the floor. Call light was not within reach. On 4/14/26 at 10:12am, R64 was assessed to be alert and oriented to person, place and time, and was observed in bed, with his call light cord wrapped around the hand sanitizer container which was attached to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level required more than one deficient practice statement:A. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its infection prevention and control policy, including its COVID-19 policy. Specifically, the facility failed to place a resident with an indwelling medical device on transmission-based precautions upon admission; failed to don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering an enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) resident room to provide direct care (R6); failed to place a COVID-19 positive resident in appropriate transmission-based (contact/droplet) precautions immediately upon return from the hospital and initiate the required monitoring protocol (R147); and failed to implement contact tracing for residents and staff exposed to a COVID-19 positive resident. These practices affected two residents (R6 & R147) reviewed for infection control practices on the total sample of 43.B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents are not verbally and mentally abused by facility staff. This affected one of three residents (R144) reviewed for staff to resident abuse on the total sample of 43. Findings include:R144 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of lumbosacral disc displacement, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and insomnia.R144 Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents brief interview for mental status score was 15/15 which indicates cognitively intact.On 4/15/26 at 1:27PM, Surveyors were walking in the hallway passing R144's room and heard loud arguing. R144's door was open and surveyor observed from the hallway V42 (MDS nurse) and V43(Housekeeping director) standing around R144's bed. V42(MDS nurse) yelled in a stern, loud and dismissive tone I'm done with this and left the room. Surveyors entered R144's room, and R144 was observed in her bed crying with two open bags of her belongings near the foot of the bed. R144 was upset and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation/orientation to one resident to ensure a safe/orderly transfer from the facility to the hospital, failed to obtain a physician order for the transfer, and failed to document the transfer in the resident's medical record. This affected one resident (R130) out of three reviewed for transfer/discharge in a sample of 43. Findings include:On 4/17/26 at 8:55 AM, V3 ADON (assistant director of nursing) stated that the nurse is expected to notify the physician and resident's family of a resident's transfer to the hospital. V3 stated that the nurse is expected to follow up with the emergency room staff and call report to the nurse. V3 stated that the nurse is expected to complete an e-interact form and SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation) for every resident. The nurse should also document the change in condition or reason for transfer to the hospital and the resident's vital signs in the resident's progress notes.R130's POS (physician order sheet), dated 3/9/26, notes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the bed hold policy to one resident or representative upon transfer to a local hospital. This affected one of (R130) three reviewed for bed hold in a sample of 43.Findings include:On 4/17/26 at 8:55 AM, V3 ADON (assistant director of nursing) stated that the nurse transferring a resident to the hospital is expected to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative with written information on the duration of the bed-hold policy.R130's medical record does not contain any documentation that R130 or R130's family received written information on bed hold.The facility's bed-hold policy, revised 6/26/25, notes the facility must inform the resident or family members being transferred of the duration of bed hold in writing.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to initiate a person-centered care plan for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and enteral nutrition for one resident admitted to the facility with a gastrostomy tube and receiving enteral nutrition. This affects one of three (R6) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan in a sample of 43.Findings include:On 4/14/26 at 10:00 AM, R6 stated that he receives bolus feedings via his gastrostomy tube after meals and at bedtime.R6's POS (physician order sheet) notes an order for enteral nutrition, 360ml (milliliters) bolus feeding after meals and at bedtime daily.On 4/16/26 at 9:30 AM, V12 IP nurse (infection prevention nurse) denied being aware R6 was admitted to this facility with a gastrostomy tube. V12 stated that R6 should have been placed on EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) upon admission due to having a gastrostomy tube. V12 stated that R6 should have a care plan for EBP and gastrostomy tube.On 4/17/26 at 8:55 AM, V3 ADON (assistant director of nursing) stated that the nurse is expected to initiate enhanced barrier…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its incontinence care policy and failed to ensure that a resident identified as requiring assistance with toileting was assessed and provided incontinence care at least every two hours. This affected one of three residents (R135) reviewed for incontinence care on the total sample of 43. Findings Includes: R135's minimal data set dated [DATE] section C (cognitive pattern) brief interview for mental status documents a score of twelve which indicate moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG (functional ability) documents: lower extremities impairment on both sides. R135 requires substantial maximal assistance rolling left to right and partial/moderate assistance for toilet hygiene. Section H (bladder and bowel) documents urinary continence always incontinent. On 4/14/26 at 11:35am, R135 who was assessed to be alert and oriented to person place and time, said he has not been provided incontinence care since yesterday evening. R135…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their physician order to ensure compression wraps were applied as prescribed (R78) and failed to ensure the old Scopolamine transdermal patch was removed before applying a new patch (R148). This affected two of three residents (R78 & R148) reviewed for quality of care on the total sample of 43. Findings Include: R78 was diagnosis with Lyphedema. Brief interview for mental status dated 2/26/26 documents a score of fifteen which indicates cognitively intact. Physician order sheet dated 9/28/25 documents: wrap bilateral lower extremities with Compression wraps with Ace bandage at 0600 (6:00am) in the morning apply. On 4/14/26 at 10:36am, R78 who was assessed to be alert and orient to person place and time said, her ace wraps for her legs was not applied today. R78 was observed without her compression ace wraps in place. R78 opened the top of her nightstand dresser drawer, R78's ace wraps were observed in the drawer. R78 said, she was supposed to have her ace wraps applied to decrease the swelling in her legs. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the ortho physician recommendations to complete physical therapy evaluation and treat, occupational therapy evaluation and treatment, and assist with passive range of motion including pendulum exercises for greater than 30 days for one of three residents (R7) reviewed for physicians' orders regarding therapy and range of motion on the total sample of 43. Findings include: R7 face sheet shows diagnosis of displaced fracture of upper end of right humerus, initial encounter for closed fracture 3/5/26. On 4/14/26 at 11:48am R7 observed alert to person, place, time and situation. R7 observed with a black sling supporting her right arm. R7 said she'd fallen from bed when she was reaching for her phone to call her brother. R7 lifted her arm and R7 was observed with limitation to the shoulder. R7 said her shoulder was not like that before she fell. On 4/16/26 at 11:40am V7 (Restorative Nurse) said R7 had a fall on 3/5/26, R7 was sent out and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their intravenous therapy policy by failing to ensure one resident's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) dressing was changed every 7 days. This affects one of one residents (R121) reviewed for intravenous therapy on the total sample of 43. Findings include:R121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis polyneuropathy, infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prothesis and anemia.On 4/14/26 at 11:40AM, R121 was in his room up to wheelchair. R121 had a t-shirt on and observed Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter to his right upper arm. There was a clear dressing over the insertion site that was rolled up around the outer edges around the entire dressing. There was a date of 3/19/26 on the dressing. R121 said no one has touched his Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Line site for a while and wasn't sure why It was there. On 4/14/26 at 12:13PM, V2 (Director of nursing, DON) said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY HEALTHCARE — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $51K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL