Berlin Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
9715 Healthway Drive, Berlin, MD 21811 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 165 certified beds · (410) 641-4400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $232,065 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-23)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 31.7% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 30.0% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.3% | 16.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.8% | 96.6% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.5% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.3% | 25.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.5% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 31.1% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.3% | 21.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.5% | 9.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.66 | 1.33 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.26 | 1.20 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 203 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.5%CMS range 39.9–55.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 16.1%CMS range 12.6–20.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 27.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.3–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 165 beds and averages 93.8 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 71 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
71 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility investigation documentation and medical records; interviews and observations, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to prevent residents with cognitive impairment from leaving the facility (Resident #41) and failed to supervise a resident outside who had been assessed to be an elopement risk (Resident #4). This failure lead to Resident #41 eloping from the facility on 8/16/23 and Resident #4 self- propelling down the facility driveway on 8/26/22 causing the Resident harm. This deficient practice was evident for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for elopement/wandering during a complaint survey. These actions resulted in the finding of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which was identified on 9/19/23 at 4:20 PM for Resident #41 and 9/21/23 at 10:50 AM for Resident #4. For Resident #41, an IJ summary tool was provided to the facility on 9/19/23 at 4:44 PM. The facility submitted their plan to remove the immediacy on 9/19/23 at 6:09 PM and it was not accepted. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-07-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #102) out of 1 Resident reviewed for a significant medication error during the re-certification survey. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm cited as past compliance. The findings include: On 07/20/25 at 5:32 PM a review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #348424 revealed a report that advised Resident #102 was mistakenly administered all of Resident #115's morning medications. As a result, the Resident experienced a significant adverse event and was admitted to the local hospital's Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for treatment. A review of Resident #115's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was conducted on 07/20/25 at 5:35 PM. The review of the MAR showed the following morning medications were scheduled to be administered on the day of the incident (8/19/24): Cyanocobalamin (vitamin B-12), Gabapentin capsule 900 mg,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of complaints MD00196300, MD00194233, facility-reported incidents MD00196345, MD00193981, hospital records, medical record, facility documentation and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to protect a vulnerable resident ' s skin from injury resulting in harm to Resident #44, and failed to put measures in place to prevent further skin breakdown (Resident #38, #39, #23, #13). This was evident for 5 ( #44, #38, #39, #23, #13) of 43 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1.) On 9/14/23 at 12:30 PM a review of facility-reported incident MD00196345 revealed that Resident #44 obtained a wound under the trach collar that was located on the back of the neck. The report documented that Resident #44 was sent to the hospital and was subsequently admitted for other symptoms not related to the area on the neck, but other preexisting conditions that the facility had been managing. On 9/14/23 at 12:30 PM a review of complaint MD00196300 revealed Resident #44 was taken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store and label food items to maintain the integrity of the specific items. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 7/17/2025, at 8:21 AM, during an initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager, the surveyor observed three opened, unlabeled bags of bread on a steel cart located in the corner of the room. The Dietary Manager confirmed that opened bags of bread were expected to be labeled. Further observations in the kitchen revealed three 14-ounce containers of Beef flavored base that were unlabeled and located on a cart with other seasonings. According to the Dietary Manager, two of these containers actually held Chicken flavored base, which had been transferred from a 24-pound container stored in the cooler. The Dietary Manager acknowledged these concerns and stated that she would address them immediately. On 7/17/2025 at 4:09 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was made aware of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Residents received accurate comprehensive assessments. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #74, #83,#100 & #11) out of 19 Residents reviewed for accuracy of assessment during the re-certification survey.The findings include: 1) During the interview conducted on 07/15/2025 at 2:19 PM, it was discovered that Resident #74 was hard of hearing and could communicate only using a whiteboard. The Resident stated that he/she could not hear and did not have hearing aids. On 07/18/2025 at 6:16 AM a review of Resident #74’s medical records revealed a diagnosis for unspecified hearing loss, bilateral. The Care Plan is a document that outlines the care and support a Resident needs, often created for individuals receiving healthcare, personal care or other types of support. It’s a personalized roadmap for managing a Resident’s health and well-being, ensuring consistent and coordinated care. Care Plans are not just for nurses;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #6, #8, & #44) out of 19 Residents reviewed for Care Plans during the re-certification survey.The findings include: 1) During an interview with Resident #6 on 7/15/25 at 3:09 PM it was revealed that the Resident was on dialysis, and he/she also reported having concerns with continuous constipation. During a review of Resident #6’s medical records conducted on 7/16/25 at 11:30 AM it was discovered that the Resident had a history of constipation and was receiving dialysis three days a week. A review of a progress note dated 5/22/25 at 5:37 PM reported that the Resident had complained of constipation and Lactulose was given. The note also stated that the Resident was scheduled for “hemodialysis in the morning.” A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #6 revealed a physician’s order for Senna and Bisacodyl…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely and accurate documentation of medical records. This was found to be evident for 3 (#42, #2, #6, & #96) out of 5 residents reviewed for record documentation during the annual survey.The findings include: 1) During an interview with Resident #42 on 7/21/25 at 08:46 AM he/she reported often receiving medications late at night and stated medications were received “sometimes almost at midnight”. During a review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #42 on 7/22/25 at 6:32 AM it was discovered that there were medication documentations past 11 PM. The documentation in the MAR revealed the following medication administration notes. On 7/03/25 - The following medications were due at 9 PM: Xarelto, Trazadone, Tamsulosin, Simvastatin, Senna, Remeron, Pregabalin and Guaifenesin. The medications were signed off as complete at 11:44 PM with a note stating “Charted late, administered on time” by LPN #26. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, facility staff interview and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the dignity of a Resident. This finding was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #68) out of 1 Resident reviewed for Resident Rights.The findings include:An indwelling Foley catheter is a flexible tube inserted through the urethra (the tube that carries urine from the urinary bladder to the outside of the body) into the bladder to drain urine. A small balloon inflated with sterile water secures it in place. The indwelling Foley catheter is connected to a drainage bag for urine collection.On the initial tour of the facility at 8:25 AM on 7/15/2025 the surveyor observed Resident #68 in bed. It was observed that a Foley catheter drainage bag was attached to the Resident's bed frame. The Foley catheter drainage bag was not covered with a privacy barrier and urine was visible in the Foley catheter drainage bag.The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #68's electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure showers were provided to a Resident as scheduled. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #65) out of 1 Resident reviewed for self-determination during the recertification survey.The findings include:During an in-person interview with Resident #65's Power of Attorney (POA) conducted on 07/15/25 at 2:51 PM, the POA expressed concern that the Resident had not received routine showers.On 07/17/25 at 3:12 PM, a review of Resident #65's physician orders revealed an order for Bathing (Bath/Shower/Days/Shift): Tues./Fri. 7-3 Shift. During a review of Resident #65's POC (Point of Care) conducted on 07/17/25 at 3:19 PM, it was discovered that the Resident had not received a shower from 04/01/25 - 07/17/25 with the exception of 1 day on 04/14/25.On 07/18/2025 at 5:50 AM a review was conducted of Resident #65's care plan. The review did not reveal that the Resident refused care or showers. During an interview conducted on 07/18/2025 at 7:08 am, the DON stated that showers are documented in the POC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete medical records were provided in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 107) out of 1 Resident reviewed for medical records during the re-certification survey. The findings include: A review of complaint #348368 reported to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) was conducted on 07/21/25 at 11:22 AM. The complainant reported that we have attempted on many occasions to obtain the medical records for Resident #107. We received 8 pages not including the cover page on 01/17/23 and 13 pages on 09/20/23 not including the cover page. We have requested to receive the complete medical records for Resident #107 multiple times since 12/22.On 07/21/25 at 11:30 AM a review of the medical records request confirmed that on 1/17/23 the facility faxed 9 pages that included the cover page and faxed 14 pages on 09/20/23 that included the cover page. These dates and number of pages faxed confirmed the complainant's concerns. No other fax confirmations were present that showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a Baseline care plan for a resident requiring hemodialysis treatments. This was evident for 1 (Resident #69) out of 2 residents requiring hemodialysis treatments reviewed during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:A Baseline care plan must be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission to the facility and must include the initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. A summary of the baseline care plan as well as a list of the resident's current medications must be provided to the resident and their responsible party.On 07/17/25 at 8:55 AM the surveyor conducted a review of Resident #69' s clinical records. The records revealed that Resident # 69 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with Diagnoses which included Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Dementia and End Stage Renal Disease. The resident receives hemodialysis treatments three days a week. Further review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the Interdisciplinary Care Plans to reveal accurate interventions for Residents. This was evident for 2 (Resident #69 & #5) out of 19 Residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision.The findings include: 1) On 07/15/2025 at 11:19 AM Resident #69 informed the surveyor that he /she had a wound on their bottom. On 07/18/25 at 11:30 AM a review of Resident #69’s clinical record revealed that the resident had been receiving daily dressing changes to the Right Thigh from 05/09/25. The physician’s order stated Cleanse Posterior Right Thigh with Soap and water, pat dry apply border gauze daily - Order Date 05/09/25. According to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), a care plan meeting is a structured, interdisciplinary conference where staff, residents, and families discuss and review the resident's care plan, ensuring needs are met and goals are achieved. In long-term care facilities, a care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care provided to a Resident met the professional standards of practice. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #65 & #55) out of 2 Residents reviewed for Services Provided Meet Professional Standards during the re-certification survey.The findings include: 1) The Surveyor observed Resident #55 in bed on 7/15/2025 at 9:00 AM during the initial tour of the facility. Resident #55 was observed with a soft cast to his/her left arm and dried blood and sutures to left forehead laceration. On 7/17/2025 at 12:30 PM the surveyor reviewed the facility’s investigation file for the facility reported incident (FRI) MD#00219326/348447 dated 7/1/2025 that the facility submitted to the Office of Healthcare Quality (OHCQ) for an unwitnessed fall with injury. Additionally, the surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #55’s electronic medical record. Review of these records revealed that Resident #55 had an unwitnessed fall (found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 58 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dependent residents' grooming needs were met in accordance with the residents' plan of care. This was evident in 1 (Resident# 69) of 1 resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL).The findings include: Resident # 69 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with Diagnoses which included Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Dementia and End Stage Renal Disease. On 07/15/2025 at 10:25 AM and on 07/18/25 at 7:40 AM the surveyor observed Resident #69 lying in bed with unshaven facial hair. On 07/20/25 at 06:30 PM the surveyor again observed the resident with unshaven facial hair approximately I/8 inch long sitting in a wheelchair in his/her room. During an interview on 07/20/2025 at 06:30 PM the Resident #69 stated I need assistance with shaving because I cannot do it myselfOn 07/17/25 at 08:55 AM a review of Resident 69's clinical record revealed a care plan initiated on 08/06/24 which stated Resident #69 had limited ability to maintain grooming/personal hygiene. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) obtain an order for the use of a splint and 2) properly assess and address the resident's condition prior to hospital transfer. This was evident for 2 (Resident #44 and #96) of 2 resident reviewed for position and mobility and 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization during the recertification survey.The findings include:1) According to the Mayo Clinic, a contracture is a condition where muscles, tendons ligaments, or skin tighten, restricting the normal movement of the body part. This can lead to a joint being stuck in a bent or flexed position.A splint is a device that supports or immobilizes a joint to prevent or correct the tightening and shortening of soft tissues (like muscles, tendons and ligaments) that restricts movements.On 7/15/2025 at 9:50 AM, during the initial facility tour, Resident #44 was observed in bed with contractures of the left elbow, left hand and right hand and was not wearing any splints…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Resident received audiology services. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #74) out of 1 Resident reviewed for treatment to maintain hearing during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: During an observation and interviews conducted on 07/15/2025 at 2:19 PM, it was discovered Resident # 74 was hard of hearing. When this Surveyor asked Resident #74 a question the Resident responded, you must use the whiteboard on the table because I cannot hear. When asked if the Resident had hearing aids by writing my question on the whiteboard, Resident #74 read the question and responded no. When asked if he/she had seen an Audiologist for the loss of hearing via the whiteboard, the Resident responded no, not since he/she had been at the facility. A review of Resident #74's medical records was conducted on 07/18/2025 at 6:16 AM. The medical records revealed a diagnosis for Unspecified Hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Residents received proper dialysis care. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #6 & #69) out of 2 Residents observed for dialysis care during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Hemodialysis is a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood when kidneys are not functioning properly. During an interview with Resident #6 on 7/15/25 at 3:09 PM it was discovered that the Resident has dialysis three times a week. During a review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #6 on 07/21/2025 at 8:25 AM it was discovered that the Resident had several orders pertaining to dialysis care and monitoring. There was an order for “Dialysis three times per week”, “Once a Day on Monday, Wednesday, Friday.” Dialysis visits for July included 7/02/25, 7/04/25, 7/07/25, 7/09/25, 7/11/25, 7/14/25, 7/16/25, 7/18/25 and 7/21/25. There was an order for “Dialysis Communication Sheet Returned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct yearly performance reviews at least every 12 months for 1 (Staff#21) of 5 staff members reviewed. The findings included:Performance reviews are to be completed at least every 12 months to identify what in-service education the geriatric nursing assistants need to address their competencies. On 07/16/25 at 2:30 PM the surveyor conducted a review of 5 Geriatric Nursing Assistants' personnel files. The records revealed that the facility failed to conduct a performance review for the calendar year 2023 for Staff #21 who had been employed by the facility for over 8 years.During an interview with the surveyor on 07/17/25 at 8:34 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that annual performance reviews for geriatric nursing assistants were conducted annually in keeping with the facility's policy. The DON reviewed the records and confirmed the surveyor's findings.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility failed to act on recommendations from pharmacist drug regimen review reports. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #12) out of 1 Resident reviewed for unnecessary medication.The findings include:A pharmacist drug regimen review (DRR), also known as a medication regimen review (MRR), is a comprehensive evaluation of all medications a Resident is currently using. This includes prescribed medications, over the counter drugs, herbal products, dietary supplements, and even total parenteral ((intravenous) nutrition and oxygen therapy. The primary purpose of a DRR is to promote positive outcomes and minimize adverse consequences associated with medication use. A pain scale is a tool used to measure and describe the intensity of pain, which is a subjective experience. The pain scale helps individuals communicate their pain levels to healthcare professionals and can be used to track pain over time.The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #12's electronic medical record on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and facility staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to 1) label/store drugs and biologicals appropriately and 2) properly secure medications. This finding was found to be evident during the review of medication administration and storage during the annual recertification survey.The findings include: 1) A Certified Medication Aide (CMA) is a healthcare professional who has completed additional training to administer medications in specific settings. They are responsible for ensuring Residents receive the correct medications at the right time and dosage, while also documenting the administration and reporting any adverse reactions or changes in Resident condition. CMAs complete a state-approved training program which included classroom instruction and practical experience in medication administration. After completing the training, CMAs must pass a certification exam. Senna Plus (sennosides-docusate sodium) is in the drug classification of a laxative. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures were followed to reduce the risk of infection. This was evident for 2 (Resident #6, #2) out of 4 residents reviewed for infection control procedures. The findings include: A dialysis catheter in the chest is a type of access used for hemodialysis, a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood when kidneys are not functioning properly. The catheter, a flexible tube, is inserted into a large vein in the neck or chest and is used to connect the patient's blood to the dialysis machine. The dialysis catheter is also known as a Central Line or a Central Venous Catheter. During an interview with Resident #6 on 7/15/25 at 9:43 AM he/she reported having wounds and a lot of problems with his/her right foot. He/she also stated it is infected to a degree. I'm supposedly on an antibiotic. Resident #6 also reported having a catheter in his/her right chest for dialysis. During an observation of the entryway to the room for Resident #6 on 7/15/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's records and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Residents were free from abuse. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #108 & #7) out of 4 Residents reviewed for abuse during the re-certification survey.The findings include: 1) A review of the Facility’s Reported Incident (FRI) #348430 was conducted on 07/17/25 at 11:48 AM. The FRI’s investigation stated that the Resident reported that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) # 6 pushed him/her by the back of the neck, shoved him/her onto the bed and injured the Resident’s arm. The facility investigated the complaint, suspended GNA #7 on 09/13/24 (the day of the incident) pending the investigation and then terminated her for the allegation of abuse on 09/19/24. During an interview conducted on 07/17/25 at 12:09 PM, the Staff Educator /Infection Control Preventionist stated during the time of the incident she was the acting Director of Nursing (DON) and had conducted the investigation. She advised that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, medical record review and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of the residents. This has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The findings include: 1) On 9/19/23 at 9:00 AM Staff #26 stated to Staff #25 there is no way she can bathe 20 residents. Review of the staffing board on Unit 1 at that time revealed there were 38 residents with 2 geriatric nursing assistants (GNAs). 2) On 9/20/23 at 7:00 AM tour of the dementia unit with 28 residents revealed one nurse (Staff #29) on the unit and one geriatric nursing assistant (Staff #34) standing at the locked door with her coat on and belongings in hand. Staff #29 was asked if there were any other staff on the unit at that time and they stated no. 3) On 9/21/23 at 11:55 AM on the dementia unit a resident was observed at the nurse's station trying to stand up, Staff #27 was standing next to the resident trying to prevent the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, it was determined that the facility administration failed to provide effective oversight activities for the facility to ensure that resources were used effectively in order to meet the health and safety needs of each resident and identify and correct inappropriate care processes/standards, as evidenced by failing to 1) ensure that the facility had sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, and 2) failing to prevent elopement from the facility by recognizing, analyzing and developing a plan to ensuring all staff are educated on appropriate supervision of a resident and prevent future elopement. The findings include: 1) During interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/26/23 at 12:30 PM, the DON stated the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) is in charge of nursing staff education. The DON stated at that time the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-27 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility records and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to conduct and document an accurate facility-wide assessment. This was evident during the review of the Staff training, education and competencies, staffing and all-hazard assessment during the complaint and the extended survey. This has the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The findings include: A facility-wide assessment is conducted to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment is to include the care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that are present within that population. A copy of the Facility Assessment was provided to the Survey team by the Administrator on 9/25/23. The assessment had a review date of 1/30/23. The Facility Assessment listed the persons involved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within 2 hours of the allegation and an injury of unknown origin within 24 hours to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 9 (#44, #16, #28, #43, #42, #34, #22, #26, #9) of 43 facility reported incidents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 9/14/23 at 12:30 PM a review of facility reported incident MD00196345 revealed on 8/26/23, during routine trach care, the respiratory therapist noticed a wound under the trach collar to the back of Resident #44's neck. The wound/injury of unknown origin was not reported to OHCQ until 8/30/23 at 3:32 PM which was not within 24 hours of finding the injury. On 9/15/23 at 7:30 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about the timely reporting. The DON stated she did not have any further information and confirmed it was not reported within 24 hours. 2) On 9/15/23 at 10:57 AM a review of facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents and or resident's responsible party (RP) a copy of their baseline care plan along with a copy of their admission medications. This was evident for 6 (#38, #40, #41, #23, #33, #45) of 48 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The baseline care plan is given to residents within 48 hours of their admission and details a variety of components of the care that the facility intends to provide to that resident. In addition to the baseline care plan, residents are also expected to receive a list of their admission medications. This allows residents and their representatives to be more informed about the care that they receive. 1) On 9/14/23 at 8:13 PM a review of Resident #38's medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and adult failure to thrive. Resident #38 required total care. There was no baseline care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to create and implement care plans related to resident's specific needs. This was evident for 6 (#38, #37, #28, #39, #23, #45) of 48 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. BIMS stands for Brief Interview for Mental Status. It is a screening tool used to assist with identifying a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure the physician wrote, dated, and signed progress notes at each resident's visit. This was evident for 7 (#38, #42, #31, #32, #39, #41, #23) of 48 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 9/14/23 at 8:13 PM a review of Resident #38's medical record revealed a physician's history and physical dated 6/12/23 that was not signed and uploaded into the medical record until 6/23/23. Further review revealed physician visits dated 6/19/23, 6/26/23, and 7/3/23 that were not signed and uploaded into the medical record until 7/18/23. Physician visits dated 7/10/23, 7/17/23, 7/24/23, 7/31/23, and 8/14/23 were not signed and uploaded to the medical record until 8/23/23. On 9/25/23 at 12:54 PM an interview of the DON regarding physician's visits. The DON acknowledged that the visits were not put in the medical record timely and stated, when I get the visits, I upload them in the computer. 2) On 9/15/23 at 12:52 PM a review of facility reported incident MD00196023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) personnel files and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews at least every 12 months for 5 out of 5 personnel files (GNA #9, #35, #40, #41 and #42) reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The outcome of performance reviews are used to provide regular in-service education to GNAs. A review was conducted of GNA personnel files on 9/25/23: 1. A review of GNA #9's personnel file revealed GNA #9 was hired on 9/2/2008 with a last performance review on 4/13/2020. 2. A review of GNA #35's personnel file revealed GNA #35 was hired on 4/22/1991 with a last performance review of 4/15/2021. 3. A review of GNA #40's personnel file revealed GNA #40 was hired on 7/2/2009 with a last performance review of 7/2/2021. 4. A review of GNA #41's personnel file revealed GNA #41 was hired on 4/23/1988 with a last performance review on 4/5/2021. 5. A review of GNA #42's personnel file revealed GNA #42 was hired on 11/11/1992 and did not have a performance review. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 4 (#37, #41, #39, #1) of 48 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) On 9/14/23 at 8:46 PM a review of facility reported incident MD00193528 revealed Resident #37 was asked to roll over in bed during care and the resident rolled too fast and fell off the side of the bed. Review of September 2023 physician's orders documented the order, floor mats to side of bed for patient safety. Review of Resident #37's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documented the order and there were places on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a complaint, observation of resident rooms, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of infection and disease. This was evident on 2 of 3 nursing units observed. The findings include: On 9/18/23 at 11:59 AM a review of complaint MD00194719 for Resident #40 was reviewed and alleged the resident was in a room with two other people, using the same bathing tools and basin. The complainant alleged the geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) left a basin for Resident #40 to use for bathing and noticed the basin was not Resident #40's, it was the roommates. The complaint alleged that despite labeling Resident #40's basin, the GNA did the same thing the next day. On 9/18/23 at 3:54 PM a tour was taken of the facility. The following observations were made: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the room Resident #40 was in, there were 2 gray basins, one on each side of the sink bowl that were not labeled.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and documentation review, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective pest control program as evidenced by numerous flies seen throughout the facility. This was evident on 2 of 3 nursing units observed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 9/21/23 at 4:07 PM observation was made of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #30 washing Resident #49. The surveyor walked over to Resident #49 and observed him/her lying in bed on a urine soaked sheet. The surveyor observed a fly crawling on Resident #49's face by the resident's mouth. The surveyor pointed that out to GNA #30 who stated, isn't that disgusting. GNA #30 then swatted at the fly. On 9/22/23 at 7:56 AM observation was made of Resident #37 lying in bed on his/her left side. Resident #37 was sleeping. Observation was made of a fly on Resident #37's forehead. Also observed was a green fly swatter sitting on the resident's dresser. Resident #37's roommate was awake at the time and stated, the flies are bad when food is out. Resident #37 had a yellow fly swatter that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: During interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/26/23 at 12:30 PM, the DON stated the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) is in charge of nursing staff education. The DON stated at that time the facility has not held any yearly in person competencies for the nursing staff but does use an online education system. During interview with the ADON on 9/26/23 at 12:45 PM, the ADON states the facility uses an online education system but she doesn't have access to track the nursing staff's education only Human Resources does. The ADON states doesn't keep record of the nursing staff's yearly education and the facility hasn't held any yearly in person competencies for the nursing staff. During interview with Human Resources (HR) on 9/26/23 at 1:00 PM, HR stated she began working at the facility in March 2023 but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of a complaint and facility reported incident, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician in a timely manner for a resident's acquisition of pressure ulcers, a change in condition, and abnormal vital signs. This was evident for 3 (#39, #41, #13) of 48 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 9/18/23 at 10:30 AM a review of complaint MD00194233 revealed an allegation that Resident #39 obtained a stage 4 pressure sore on the buttocks while in the facility. On 9/18/23 Resident #39's medical record was reviewed and revealed a 6/12/23 at 4:51 PM wound assessment that documented a Stage III pressure ulcer was discovered and it documented, present on admission. The pressure ulcer was 1.7 cm (centimeters) in length, 1.5 cm in width and 0.5 cm in depth. The note was documented by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). On 6/19/23 at 3:37 PM the ADON documented the pressure ulcer was larger and the wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a complaint, observation of resident rooms and equipment, and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was evident on 1 of 3 nursing units observed. The findings include: On 9/18/23 at 11:59 AM a review of complaint MD00194719 for Resident #40 was reviewed and alleged the facility did not have safe equipment for transfers and the facility was dirty and in disrepair. The complainant alleged Resident #40, who was admitted for rehabilitation following hip surgery, was placed in a room without grab bars on both sides of the toilet and that the bathroom sink was in deplorable condition. On 9/18/23 at 3:54 PM a tour was taken of the facility. The following observations were made: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the room Resident #40 was in, there was a small chip on the front side of the sink in the bathroom. There were 3 grab bars in which 1 grab bar appeared newly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility reported incidents, record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the residents with an environment that was free of misappropriation of property. This was evident for 1 (#29) of 48 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 9/15/23 at 9:31 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00186992 and MD00187053 revealed Resident #29's spouse reported to staff on 12/21/22 that Resident #29 was missing a small red tablet that was brought into the facility on Thanksgiving Day in 2022 by the spouse and the resident's daughter. It was documented that staff called the daughter who confirmed she brought the tablet in on Thanksgiving Day from the community home where Resident #29 had resided, and there were games downloaded on the tablet. The facility's investigation documented that Resident #29 was interviewed and had last seen the tablet 2 days prior on the dresser, plugged into the charger. A staff interview that was included in the investigative packet provided to the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility administrative records, facility investigations, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents of alleged abuse and neglect. This was evident for 3 (#34, #23, #1) of 48 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 9/19/23 at 8:49 PM a review of facility reported incident MD00193218 revealed the family member of Resident #34 alleged that Resident #34 stated that another resident grabbed the resident's left arm and tried to pull the resident into the shower room. Review of the facility's investigation revealed the family member reported the incident to staff on Sunday, 6/4/23. Further review of the facility's investigation revealed 2 geriatric nursing assistants (GNAS) and 1 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) were interviewed about the alleged incident. Review of the 6/2/23 and 6/3/23 actual worked nursing scheduled revealed there was 1 other LPN and 4 other GNAs that worked during that time that were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to accurately revise a resident's care plan for wandering (Resident #7). This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record on 9/19/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital for rehabilitation with the plan for the Resident to return home. Further review of the Resident's record revealed a care plan entitled: Resident experiences wandering (moves with no rational purpose, seemingly oblivious to needs or safety) and has a wanderguard on. The care plan had a last revision date of 8/24/23. A Wanderguard is used when a resident is at risk of wandering, a monitoring device such as a Wanderguard bracelet may be used to help ensure safety. Observation of Resident #7 on 9/19/23 at 9:00 AM revealed the Resident does not have a wanderguard in place. During interview of the Resident at that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to perform activities of daily living for a dependent resident (Resident #12). This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Observation of Resident #12 on 9/21/23 at 12:00 PM revealed the Resident to be unshaven. During interview of the Resident at that time, the Resident was asked if he/she wanted to be shaved and showered. The Resident stated sure. Review of Resident #12's medical record on 9/21/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include dementia. Dementia is a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life. Review of the Resident #12's MDS (Minimum Date Set) Assessment conducted on 8/25/23 revealed the facility staff coded the Resident in Section G0120 Bathing as total dependence. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to follow the hospital discharge summary and obtain blood work when ordered and apply an ice pack as ordered to a resident's surgical site. This was evident for 2 (#39, #45) of 48 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 9/18/23 at 10:30 AM a review of Resident #39's medical record revealed a 6/7/23 at 11:25 AM nursing note that documented the emergency room was called to give report on Resident #39. The Nurse Practitioner wanted the resident sent out to the hospital to receive a blood transfusion. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented, Problem 1: hemoglobin 6.5 and patient found to be light brown heme-positive (blood positive) stool. The summary continued, admitting diagnosis to hospital on 6/7/23 was hypokalemia, anemia, and GI bleed. The summary documented Resident #39 had chronic anemia. According to the National Institute of Health (NIH) anemia is a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of a complaint, a closed medical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to timely obtain pain medication and failed to perform pain assessments for a newly admitted resident after having surgery. This was evident for 1 (#40) of 48 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 9/18/23 at 11:59 AM a review of complaint MD00194719 revealed an allegation that pain medication was not available for Resident #40 upon admission to the facility and that the resident was not assessed for pain while in the facility. On 9/18/23 at 11:59 AM a review of Resident #40's medical record revealed a 7/13/23 at 2:05 PM nursing note that documented Resident #40 was admitted to the facility from an acute care facility where Resident #40 underwent surgery for a fractured right hip with trochanter repair following a fall. The note documented that Resident #40 received Percocet for pain per the hospital. Review of the 7/13/23 hospital discharge summary documented that Resident #40 was to have Oxycodone-acetaminophen (Endocet)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of complaint MD00194719, medical record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that pain medications were available to a resident upon admission to the facility. This was evident for 1 (#40) of 6 residents reviewed for a complaint during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) A review of complaint MD00194719 on 9/18/23 at 11:59 AM revealed an allegation that Resident #40's pain medications were not given timely and were not available upon admission. On 9/18/23 at 11:59 AM a review of Resident #40's medical record revealed a 7/13/23 at 2:05 PM nursing note that documented Resident #40 was admitted to the facility from an acute care facility where Resident #40 underwent surgery for a fractured right hip with trochanter repair following a fall. The note documented that Resident #40 received Percocet for pain per the hospital. Review of the 7/13/23 hospital discharge summary documented that Resident #40 was to have Oxycodone-acetaminophen (Endocet) 5-325 mg. 1 tablet by mouth every 4 to 6 hrs. prn (when necessary) for moderate pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and documentation review it was determined that facility staff failed to keep medication and treatment carts locked when unattended. This was evident on 1 of 4 nursing units observed during random observations made during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 9/18/23 at 4:30 PM observation was made on the dementia unit of a treatment cart and a medication cart sitting in the hallway near the shower room that was unlocked and unattended. The surveyor opened the top drawer of the treatment cart and observed prescription ointments. The surveyor then opened the top drawer of the medication cart and observed 2 insulin pens, a pair of scissors, eye drops, and other miscellaneous items. The remaining drawers were opened and contained resident medications. The surveyor stood at the carts for 4 minutes until Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 looked up and the surveyor asked her if she realized that she left the carts unlocked. She said, oh. LPN #4 sat at the nurse's station until the surveyor informed LPN #4 that there was a resident walking in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician with the laboratory results of a CBC (complete blood count) that were outside of clinical reference ranges. This was evident for 1 (#39) of 6 residents reviewed for a complaint during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 9/18/23 at 10:30 AM a review of Resident #39's medical record revealed a hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] that had discharge instructions for the facility to obtain a CBC (complete blood count) in 3 days which would have been on Monday, 6/12/23. Review of the medical record revealed the facility did not get the blood draw until 6/14/23. The result was a hemoglobin of 8.6 with a hematocrit of 26.8. Review of the lab orders in Resident #39's medical record documented that the Director of Nursing (DON) had created the order in the medical record on 6/10/23 and had put them in to be done on 6/14/23. Further review of the medical record failed to produce documentation that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-10 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that the residents or resident's representatives were notified in writing of reason residents are being transferred out of the facility to an acute care hospital. This was found to be evident for 4 out of 4 residents records reviewed for hospitalization involving Resident's (R#72), (R#74), (R#284) and (R#287) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey process. The finding includes: 1). On 06/01/22 at 9:30 AM closed medical record review involving R#72 revealed resident was transferred out of facility to acute care hospital for unplanned change in condition with transfer note written on 8/24/19 and 01/05/22 for further medical evaluation. Resident returned to the facility after each hospital course. 2). On 06/06/22 at 4:00 PM reviewed intake MD00151033 revealed a concern that resident #284 was transferred to acute care hospital for a change of physical condition on 01/26/20 from facility for medical evaluation after experiencing an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to revise and update care plan that addressed residents after change in condition (Resident #72, #284, #74, #6 and #48). This was evident 5 out of 31 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The finding includes: The care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Medical record review revealed residents (R#72), (R#74) and (R#284) was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but not limited to chronic respiratory failure, cerebral infarction, dementia and other chronic health condition which requires ongoing medical monitoring and treatment. 1). On 06/01/22 at 9:30 AM closed medical record review involving R#72 revealed resident was transferred out of facility to acute care hospital for unplanned change in condition with transfer note written on 01/05/22 for further medical evaluation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure residents receive treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice (Resident #26, #48, #443, #22, #70, #9 and #389). This was evident for 7 out of 71 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to order a medication for Resident #26. Review of Resident #26's medical record on 6/1/22 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include urinary tract infection. Further medical record review revealed the Resident was seen by a urologist on 2/23/22 and ordered for the Resident to continue Methamine 1 mg twice a day. A urologist is a medical doctor specializing in conditions that affect the urinary tract. Methamine is an antibiotic that eliminates bacteria that cause urinary tract infections. It usually is used on a long-term basis to treat chronic infections and to prevent recurrence of infections. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure resident wishes for showers were honored (#6 and #52). This was evident for 2 out of 71 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: 1. Resident #6 was interviewed on 5/31/22 at 4:28 PM. The resident said that he/she has only received one shower since admission on [DATE]. The clinical record was reviewed on 6/2/22 at 1:22 PM. It was revealed that the resident received bed baths on: 5/9/22, 5/12/22, 5/15/22, 5/18/22, 5/22/23, 5/24/22, 5/26/22, 5/28/22, 5/31/22, 6/1/22, and 6/2/22. There was an absence of evidence that the resident received any showers. The Administrator was informed of the lack of showers on 6/6/22 at 12:30 PM. Evidence of showers was not provided prior to the exit conference. 2. This surveyor interviewed Resident #52 on 5/31/22 at 4:11 PM. The resident said he/she has not had a shower since admission on [DATE]. The resident's clinical record was reviewed and there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-10 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to have petty cash available to Resident #40. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review of Personal Funds and 1 of 71 resident selected for review during an annual survey. The findings include: Surveyor interview with Resident #40 on 6/1/22 at 3:00 PM revealed the resident stated that he/she wanted to order a pizza. The resident stated that he/she was notified that there was $10.00 in the petty cash in the facility for the resident to access. The resident stated that no pizza would cost $10.00 and forfeited the pizza. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 6/2/22 at 11:45 AM revealed that there is $500.00 in the facility for petty cash, separated by departments. $100.00 is up front and the other $400.00 is locked up. Further interview with the NHA and [NAME] President of Regulatory Compliance on 6/8/22 at 10:45 AM revealed access to petty cash is only available while there is staff in the facility from administration (NHA, Director of Nursing). Once the administrative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-10 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on resident council meeting, tour of the facility, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents are informed of the results to the state surveys as well as signage to inform the residents of the location of the state survey results. The findings are: This surveyor met with members of the resident council on 6/2/22 at 2:10 PM. The residents stated that they were unaware of where the state survey book was located. They also stated that they were unaware of any signage that would inform them of the location(s) of the state survey book. Tour of the facility on 6/2/22 at 4:29 PM revealed that none of the units had a survey book located in plain sight and in easy access. There were also no signs telling residents where the survey books are located. This surveyor toured the facility with the Administrator on 6/3/22 at 11:00 AM. Survey books were found behind each of the nursing stations. Being behind the nursing stations would require the residents ask the nursing staff to see the results.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-10 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to transmit a MDS assessment to the Centers of Medicare/Medicaid (CMS) within 14 days of completion for Resident #1. This was evident for 1 of 71 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problem. MDS information is transmitted electronically by nursing homes to the national MDS database at CMS. Medical record review on 6/1/22 at 3:30 PM revealed the facility staff completed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 on 4/14/22; however, failed to transmit the MDS to CMS within the 14-day time frame. Transmittal requirements. Within 14 days after a facility completes a resident's assessment, a facility must electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to initiate care plan for Resident #70 for communication. This was evident for 1 of 71 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems A nursing care plan (NCP) is a formal process that correctly identifies existing needs and recognizes potential needs or risks. Care plans provide communication among nurses, their patients, and other healthcare providers to achieve health care outcomes. Without the nursing care planning process, the quality and consistency of patient care would be lost. Nursing care planning begins when the client is admitted to the agency and is continuously updated throughout in response to the client's changes in condition and evaluation of goal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer medications to Resident #5 in accordance with the standard of nursing practice. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents selected for review during medication administration observation during the annual survey. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #5 on 6/1/22 at 10:00 AM (for drug reconciliation) revealed the physician ordered the following medications for Resident #5: On 6/24/21 the physician ordered: MVI (Multi-vitamin) 1 tablet by mouth every day-(supplement), 6/24/21 Fish oil 1000 milligrams, 2 capsules a day (supplement), 6/26/21 Magnesium oxide 400 mgs by mouth 1 tablet, 1 time a day (supplement), 6/28/21 Vitamin D3, 5000 units 1 tablet, 1 time a day (vitamin supplement), 7/26/21 Tylenol 325 mgs, 2 tablets by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain (pain medication) and, 7/28/21 Letrozole 2.5 mg 1 tablet, 1 time a day for breast cancer (estrogen blocker). Observation of medication pass on 6/1/22 at 8:18 AM revealed CMA (Certified Medicine Aide) #1 failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-10 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Residents #59 and Resident #37 in a position conducive to eating. This was evident for 2 of 20 residents observed during tour of station during delivery of food trays on Station 1. The findings include: One of the most important steps in preparing to assist a resident at meal or snack time is assuring proper positioning, making it easier for the resident to eat as independently as possible. Residents require individual strategies for positioning, but this usually includes keeping the upper body securely in an upright position. Poor positioning leads to a higher risk for choking or aspirating food or liquid into the lungs. 1. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #59 in the most conducive position for eating. Observation of Resident #59 on 5/31/22 at 12:15 PM revealed the resident noted in bed eating lunch. It was also noted the resident was noted with an extreme lean to the left side and not fully in a high fowlers position ( high fowler's position, the resident is usually seated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-10 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide restorative nursing services that would allow Resident #31 the ability to achieve the greatest independence with performing Activities of Daily Living. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents selected for ADL decline and 1 of 2 residents selected for review of Range of Motion and 1 of 71 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Activities of daily living are routine activities people do every day without assistance. There are six basic ADLs: eating, bathing, getting dressed, toileting, transferring and continence. It is the expectation the facility staff will provide all ADL services to residents as the resident can tolerate. 1 A. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #31 with Restorative Nursing (RNP) for Range of Motion (ROM) as ordered by Physical Therapy (PT) in collaboration with the physician. Medical record review for Resident #31 on 6/33/22 at 9:00 AM revealed on 3/8/21 the PT ordered: Restorative Nursing: Active range of motion exercise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and medical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to provide grooming and personal hygiene services (Resident #27). This is evident for 1 of 3 residents selected for review of ADL care and 1 of 71 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: The activities of daily living (ADLs) are a term used to collectively describe fundamental skills required to independently care for oneself, such as eating, bathing, and mobility. The basic ADL include the following categories: Ambulating: The extent of an individual's ability to move from one position to another and walk independently. Feeding: The ability of a person to feed oneself. Dressing: The ability to select appropriate clothes and to put the clothes on. Personal hygiene: The ability to bathe and groom oneself and maintain dental hygiene, nail, and hair care. Continence: The ability to control bladder and bowel function Toileting: The ability to get to and from the toilet, using it appropriately, and cleaning oneself. Surveyor observation of Resident #27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers (Resident #6). This is evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a annual survey. A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). The findings included: Review of Resident #6's medical record on 6/8/22 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and observations, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide fall mats next to the bed of Residents #22 and Resident #59. This was evident for 2 of 71 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Fall mats are made from high-impact foam and are designed to help prevent injury from potential falls and are usually placed next to the bed where most falls occur. 1. The facility staff failed to place fall mats next to the bed of Resident #22 as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #22 on 6/1/22 at 9:30 AM revealed on 4/16/21 the physician ordered: bilateral fall matt while in bed. Surveyor observation of the resident on 6/1/22 at 11:00 AM, 6/2/22 at 8:29 AM, 6/3/22 at 7:40 AM, revealed the resident in bed; however, the facility staff failed to apply the bilateral fall mats as ordered. 2. The facility staff failed to provide fall mats next to the bed of Resident #59 as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #59 on 5/31/22 at 10:45 AM revealed on 6/28/20 the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to obtain monthly weights as ordered, conduct an accurate readmission nutrition assessment and conduct all quarterly nutritional assessment by a licensed dietitian for a resident (Resident #41). This was evident for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #41's medical record on 6/2/22 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Resident's care plans revealed the Resident had a care plan entitled Resident has risk for weight loss due to inadequate meal intakes with a start date of 12/14/21. A. Further review of the medical record revealed a physician order on 9/1/21 for monthly weights, the first Monday of the month. Review of the Resident's weights in the medical record revealed the Resident had no monthly weight documented for November 2021 and no monthly weight documented 12/6/21 (the first Monday of the month). B. Further review of the Resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain pre and post dialysis weights and vital signs for Resident (#27). This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review of Hemodialysis and 1 of 71 selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #27 on 6/2/22 at 11:30 AM revealed on 10/9/18 the physician ordered: Hemodialysis, MWF. Healthy kidneys clean the blood and remove extra fluid in the form of urine. They also make substances that keep the body healthy. Dialysis replaces some of these functions when the kidneys no longer work. In hemodialysis, a dialysis machine and a special filter are used to clean the blood. Weights and vital signs are generally the numeric measures of life that typically include a patient's temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure. The main reason why these signs need to be monitored is basically to establish a baseline before, during, and after a dialysis treatment. Review of the facility staff documentation revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the medication carts are locked and secured. This was evident for 1 unit out of the 6 units in the facility. The findings are: This surveyor was at the nursing station for rooms in the 300's and 400's. While at the desk this surveyor observed an unlocked medication cart on 5/31/22 at 3:45 PM. The drawers were able to be opened. There was one resident in the hallway about 10 feet away, but the resident did not react to the drawers being opened. Another resident went past the unlocked medication cart in their wheelchair. Staff RN #11 was made aware at 4:03 PM and he locked the cart. The Director of Nursing was made aware on 6/1/22 at 2:12 PM.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to obtain dental services for a resident (Resident #68). This was evident for 1 out of 20 residents reviewed for dental services during an annual survey. The findings include: Observation of Resident #68 on 5/31/22 at 1:45 PM revealed the Resident to have no upper teeth and 10 lower teeth that were broken with obvious decay. During interview with the Resident at that time, the Resident stated he/she would like to have his/her lower teeth pulled and to be evaluated for dentures. At that time the Resident denied any pain. Review of the Resident's medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. On 3/21/22 the facility staff conducted an annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment and coded the Resident in Section L0200 Dental as Obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Further review of Resident #68's medical record revealed on 10/2/21 the Resident was seen by the dentist. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to maintain the medical record for Resident #27 in the most accurate form. Medical record review for Resident #27 on 6/1/22 at 11:30 AM revealed on 1/28/19 the physician ordered: Wanderguard placed regarding resident being transferred off of closed-unit. Wanderguard to be checked by nursing every shift for patency of said wanderguard. Continue with plan of care and monitoring. Further record review revealed the physical ordered: Inspect Wanderguard every shift to make sure it is in good working condition, If not, replace immediatley, every shift. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. Review of the MDS completed by the facility staff on 9/14/21, 12/4/21, 2/14/22 and documented Section E- 0900- Wandering- Prescence and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interviews; It was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of infection in 1. storing and transporting of linen and 2. in the administration of medication (Resident #5). This was evident in 1 out of 2 clean linen carts observations and 1 out of 3 residents during medication administration during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. On 6/1/22 at 8:35 AM during facility tour observed on station-6 the observation nursing unit observed unattended uncovered linen cart standing between residents' rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Surveyor was able to count all the clean linen on linen cart which included: On the 1st shelve of linen cart 1-television remote, 1-8fl.oz bottle of smooth and cool cleaner shampoo and body wash, 4-hospital gowns, 3-bed pads, 8-bath towels, 2-flat sheets, 8-fitted sheets, and 20-pillow cases. After surveyor completed counting the clean linen on the linen cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident #113 with the preferred flavor of dietary supplement. This was evident for 1 of 41 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Review of the Resident 113's meal ticket on 9/19/18 at 8:00 AM revealed Resident #113 was to have vanilla or strawberry ensure. Ensure is a source of complete, balanced nutrition for supplemental use with or between meals. It may benefit residents who have malnutrition, are at nutritional risk, are experiencing involuntary weight loss, or on modified diets. Observation of the resident's breakfast tray at that time revealed the facility staff failed to provide Resident #113 with vanilla or strawberry ensure; however, provided Resident #113 with milk chocolate ensure. Interview with Resident #113 at that time also revealed he/she did not like chocolate ensure and failed to ice or cool the Ensure. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 9/19/18 at 1:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and observation it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure furniture was maintained in a clean fashion. The findings include: An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on [DATE] at 10:32 AM revealed that a maroon recliner situated next to the A bed had multiple white stains on the seat and foot rest. The recliner was observed again on [DATE] at 9:20 AM to still be in the room. The resident in the B bed was interviewed. The resident said the roommate had expired about three weeks ago and the roommate's family had donated it to the facility. According to the resident maintenance was supposed to move it but had not as of this date. The Environmental Services Director was interviewed on [DATE] at 1:29 PM. He stated that donated furniture is normally removed immediately, stored, and cleaned. He told two members of the maintenance department within fifteen minutes of this interview to move the recliner.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer pain medication as ordered by the physician and failed to evaluate the effectiveness of that pain medication in a timely manner for Resident #376. This was evident for 1 of 41 residents reviewed during the survey process and 1 of 7 residents reviewed during a complaint survey (MD 00127697). The findings include: Pain has been identified as the fifth vital sign. Assessment of a resident's experience of pain is a crucial component in providing effective pain management. A systematic process of pain assessment, measurement and re-assessment (re-evaluation), enhances the health care teams' ability to achieve pain management. Pain should be measured using an assessment tool that identifies the quantity and/or quality of one or more of the dimensions of the resident's experience of pain. Measuring pain enables the nurse to assess the amount of pain the resident is experiencing. Resident's self-reporting (expression) of their pain is regarded as the gold standard of pain assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-09-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain a medication error rate below 5%. Based on observation of medication pass, it was determined the medication error rate was 5.88%. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents observed and 2 out of 34 opportunities (Resident #116). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to administer medication to Resident #116 as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #116 revealed on 11/19/16 the physician ordered: Vitamin D 5000 IU (international unit) every day. Having enough vitamin D is important for several reasons, including maintaining healthy bones and teeth; it may also protect against a range of conditions such as cancer, type 1 diabetes, and multiple sclerosis. Vitamin D is essential for strong bones, because it helps the body use calcium from the diet. Observation of medication pass on 9/19/18 at 8:30 AM revealed facility nurse #3 staff failed to administer the Vitamin D as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility staff failed to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-09-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain all essential mechanical, electrical, equipment in safe operating condition on the lower level of the facility. The findings include: 9/19/2018 at 8:58AM, during the tour of the lower level of the facility with the Maintenance Director the following observation was made: The tour of the lower Unit level revealed Power strips in the patient's rooms. Six of the patient's rooms had Haier portable air conditioners connected to a powder strip. The manual for the Haier portable air conditioner revealed safety precautions that read do not use an adapter or an extension cord and a warning that read Following theses basic precautions will reduce the risk of fire, electrical shock, injury or death when using your air conditioners. The Surveyor informed the Office of Health Care on 9/19/2018, and a Life Safety inspector was sent out to tour the Facility on 9/20/2018. At that time the power cords were removed, and the Haier portable air conditioners were connected to the electrical supply as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-09-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to post the the resident census and total number and actual hours worked by categories of Registered nurses, Licensed practical nurses, and Certified nursing aides at the beginning of the shift. This was evident for the facility and on 2 of 3 nursing units during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 9/25/23 at 9:30 AM, observation was made of the facility lobby and entrance hallways. There was no nursing daily staffing schedule and resident census posted for the public or residents. During interview with Staff #44 (Receptionist) on 9/25/23 at 9:35 AM, Staff #44 was asked where the staffing assignments were for the day. At that time Staff #44 was able to show the Surveyor staffing sheets that were kept behind the lobby desk counter but not posted to be visible to the public or residents. A tour of the nursing units was conducted on 9/25/23 at 10:00 AM. Review of the staffing board on Station 1 had the census (total number of residents on the unit), the 1 nurse name, 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$232,065 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $21,348 — penalty dated 2025-07-23
- $210,717 — penalty dated 2023-09-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARYLAND LONG TERM CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/18/2016 |
| GOZALI, ANGELICA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/22/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $507K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215126. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.