Devlin Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 167 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 93.9 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-20 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to monitor a resident with abnormal lab findings. The failure to do so, resulted in harm to the resident since the resident had to be hospitalized for treatment. This was evident for 1 (#6) of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. The findings include:Cirrhosis of the liver is a condition in which the liver becomes scarred and unable to work properly. Ascites is a complication in which the liver does not produce protein in the blood causing fluid to build up in the abdominal cavity and if left untreated it can cause the resident to have trouble breathing. Esophageal varices is a complication that is caused by increased pressure in the portal (liver) vein that results in weak blood vessels in the esophagus. These weak blood vessels bleed easily and are the cause of 1/3rd of the deaths from cirrhosis. Lastly, with endstage liver disease, the liver cannot rid the body of waste and allows ammonia to build up in the blood. The high ammonia levels cause hepatic encephalopathy as evidenced by changes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to the local law enforcement authorities. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse.The findings include:Investigation documentation and facility reported incident (FRI) #3022768 was reviewed on 6/26/26 at 12:30 PM. The review revealed that on 5/22/26 at approximately 9:00 PM, Resident #3 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 that s/he experienced pain while receiving evening care from Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #4; and the GNA failed to stop when Resident #3 repeatedly told her to stop because she was causing pain. GNA notified the nurse. The resident spoke to a family member immediately after the encounter. The family member telephoned the facility and spoke to the nurse.The resident was assessed by LPN #3 at that time, no injuries were found, and the report of an allegation of abuse was submitted to the state agency. GNA #4 was suspended pending the outcome of the facility's investigation.The facility's self-report indicated that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to 1) ensure advance directives and decision-making authority were established and maintained for a resident who lacks decision making capacity and 2) document that residents were informed of their right to formulate Advance Directives upon admission. This deficient practice was evident for 4 (Resident #4, #1, #10 and #11) of 4 residents reviewed for Advance Directives during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 03/25/26 at 9:40 AM, a review of Resident #4's medical record indicated the resident lacked decision making capacity at the time of admission in March 2024. The resident's medical record failed to show evidence the facility obtained documentation of an authorized decision-maker, including advance directive for the resident. During an interview with the Director of Social Services (DSS) #14 on 03/25/26 at 10:15 AM, she reported that the resident's family member had been making decisions since 2024; however, no legal documentation was present to support the family member's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to process and store linens in a manner to maintain infection prevention. This was evident during 1 of 1 observation of the laundry room during an annual survey.The findings include:On 03/24/26 at 9:02 AM, an observation of the hallway by the clean and dirty laundry rooms revealed two uncovered clothing racks which appeared to be full of resident linen.At the same time, further observation of the hallway revealed a room which had a singular washer and dryer next to one another. Further observation of the room revealed an uncovered clothing rack labeled, unlabeled clothing, and a medium sized basket on the floor of various rags/cloths.On 03/24/26 at 9:03 AM, an interview with Housekeeping Aide (Staff #16) revealed that only resident linen was washed, dried, and sorted in the room where there was a singular washer and dryer. She further indicated they have separate clean and dirty laundry rooms for bed linen, towels, and other items other than resident clothing. During the same interview, the surveyor asked Staff #16 what the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to make sure a legal decision maker was in place for a resident in a timely manner. This deficient practice was evident for one resident (Resident #4) reviewed for decision making capacity during the annual survey.The findings include:On 03/25/26 at 9:40 AM, a review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/06/2024, with multiple diagnoses, including dementia. Further review indicated that no advance directives were documented for the resident. On 05/31/2024, the attending physician, and on 06/03/24 the nurse practitioner, certified that Resident #4 lacked decision making capacity. The medical records failed to show evidence of a court appointed legal healthcare decision maker.On 03/25/26 at 10:15 AM, during an interview, the Director of Social [NAME] (DSS) #14 stated that when a resident is admitted without decision-making capacity, the facility contacts the resident's family and advises them to seek…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days of a significant change. This was evident for 1 (Resident #52) of 3 residents reviewed during the annual re-certification survey.The findings included:On 03/23/26 at 10:28 AM, during the initial observation, Resident #52 was observed lying in bed on her back and her left hand was contracted.On 3/25/26 at 7:38 AM, Resident #52's medical records were reviewed and revealed that Physical Therapy (PT) assessed contractures of her right and left ankle upon their admission assessment on 3/1/23.Occupational Therapy (OT) notes revealed Resident #52 had contracture of muscle in their left hand on 4/26/24.The MDS assessments were then reviewed and revealed that in section GG functional limitation in range of motion on 6/7/2024, 9/5/2024, and 12/6/24, the upper extremities (shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand) were documented as no impairment, even though Resident #52 was being treated by OT for left hand contraction since…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a 48-hour baseline care plan upon admission. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 106) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans during the annual re-certification survey.The findings include: On 03/24/26 at 1:53 PM Resident #106 medical records were reviewed and revealed that Resident #106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The baseline care plan could not be found in the Matrix, the facilities electronic health records (EHR).On 03/24/26 at 2:43 PM Staff #5, the Regional Clinical Director of Nursing (CDON) was asked to provide a copy of Resident #106's 48-hour baseline care plan.On 03/24/26 at 2:58 PM Staff #2, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Staff #5 CDON were interviewed and asked if they had documentation that Resident #106's 48-hour base line care plan was completed. The DON stated that they did not do the 48-hour care plan for Resident #106. Both the DON and the CDON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the resident's need for oxygen therapy. This deficient practice was evident for one (Resident #19) resident reviewed for care plans during the annual survey.The findings include:On 03/23/2026 and 03/24/2026, the surveyor observed Resident #19 in bed receiving oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula.A review of the resident's comprehensive care plan failed to include the use of oxygen therapy, monitoring, or interventions related to respiratory needs.On 03/24/2026, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that the care plan should have been updated to reflect the resident's oxygen use following the hospitalization in October 2025 and November 2025.A review of the hospital discharge summaries dated October 2025 and November 2025 confirmed ongoing oxygen therapy needs; however, the care plan was not updated to reflect these changes in condition.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained and implemented for oxygen therapy. This deficient practice was evident for one resident (Resident #19) reviewed for professional standard of practice during the annual survey.The findings include:On 03/23/2026 and 03/24/2026, the surveyor observed Resident #19 in bed receiving oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula.On 03/24/2026, during an interview, the Registered Nurse (RN) #12 confirmed the resident was receiving oxygen. Both the surveyor and RN #12 reviewed the resident's medical record which failed to reveal an order for oxygen. The RN acknowledged the order was missing and stated the resident should have an oxygen order.A review of the resident's hospital discharge documents dated October 2025 indicated the resident was to be weaned to 1 liter of oxygen, and hospital discharge documents dated November 2025, indicated a history of hypoxia (low oxygen) requiring 3 liters of oxygen via nasal cannula.On 03/24/2026, the Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a dependent resident's grooming needs were met. This was evident in 1 (Resident# 10) of 1 resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL).The findings include:On 03/23/26 at 11:36 AM the surveyor observed Resident #10 sitting at the side of his/her bed, with a disheveled appearance and facial hair about a quarter of an inch long.On 0/23/26 a review Resident #10's most recent MDS ARD 02/11/26 revealed a Brief Interview Mental (BIMS) score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. A further review of the clinical record and care plans did not find evidence that the resident refused care, including shaving and grooming.On 03/23/26 at 2:28 PM in an interview GNA #19 stated that she was not assigned to the resident at the time of the interview, but she had a good relationship with the resident. She indicated that whenever she provided care the resident did not refuse grooming.On 03/24/26 at 1:10 PM the surveyor again observed the resident with unshaven facial hair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure effective communication by not addressing hearing impairment for a resident identified with hearing loss. This deficient practice was evident for one (Resident #82) resident of two residents reviewed for vision and hearing during the annual survey.The findings include:On 03/24/26 at 10:08 AM, during an interview with Resident #82, the resident reported difficulty hearing and asked the surveyor to stand on the left side of the bed since hearing is better with the left ear. The resident also reported they did not have hearing aids.Review of the care plan dated 02/06/2025 identified hearing loss and included interventions such as facing the resident and speaking clearly. A review of the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated minimal hearing difficulty. The most recent MDS dated [DATE] indicated a decline in hearing to moderate hearing difficulty. Further review of the medical record failed to show…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,735 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,735 — penalty dated 2026-03-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $451K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD