Faith Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 97.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. Specifically, on 09/01/25 a demented, confused resident was found across the street, approximately 500 feet, from the nursing home facility by a citizen passing by in a car. This citizen contacted 911 emergency services, detailing that a young lady was on the ground in front of a local grocery store. On 09/04/25 at 7:45PM, the State Agency determined that the facility's noncompliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations had caused or was likely to cause serious harm, psychosocial harm, serious impairment or death.On 09/04/25 at 7:45 PM, the Administrator was notified that the failure to provide appropriate supervision to Resident (R)1, resulting in a successful elopement from the facility, constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689.On 09/04/25 at 7:45 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their responsible party (RP) were provided with a written notice of transfer and/or a written bed hold for one of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations Resident (R)105.This failure had the potential to affect the resident and their Responsible Party (RP) by not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired and had the potential to contribute to the possible denial of re-admission and loss of the resident's home following a hospitalization for residents transferred to the hospital. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge/Transfer dated 10/23/19, stated, .facility will include the patient/resident and family in developing a safe discharge plan to address the patient's/resident's individual needs by obtaining a discharge/transfer order from the physician, to notify the patient/resident, his/her legal representative,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly stored for one of one resident reviewed for respiratory care, Resident (R)9, of 23 residents sampled. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of infection and improper respiratory equipment maintenance.Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Handheld Nebulizer, revised 02/12/24, included in the procedure process: .23. Disassemble device and rinse the mouthpiece and nebulizer cup with water and dry. Place the entire unit in a bag to be maintained in the patient's/resident's room. Dispose of equipment every 24-48 hours. Review of R9's Face Sheet, in the resident's paper medical revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pneumonia. Review of R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/12/26, located under the Assessments section of the MDS, indicated R9 had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to assess residents for the use of bed rails, obtain physician's orders and informed consent prior to the installation of side rails on residents' beds for two of seven residents reviewed for accidents out of 26 sampled residents (Resident (R) 11 and R14). These failures placed the residents at risk for injury and restraint. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Rails and Side Rails, Installation and Use Policy, revised 05/05/23 indicated, The facility will attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail.Qualified staff will assess the patient/resident for continued use of bedrails/side rails at least quarterly, annually and with a significant change.The risks and benefits of bed rails/side rails will be reviewed with the resident and/or responsible party. Consent and physician order will be obtained prior to the installation of bed rails/side rails.1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were inspected and maintained per the facility policy for two of seven residents (Resident (R) 11 and R14) reviewed for accidents out of 26 sampled residents. There was no evidence that the residents' beds were appropriately inspected and maintained to ensure the installed side rails were safe for residents' use. This failure placed the residents at risk for risk of entrapment. Findings include:Review of the facility's Bed Rails and Side Rails, Installation and Use Policy, revised 05/05/23 indicated, The resident will be evaluated for the risk of entrapment prior to installation (of bed rails), and Facility will ensure the patient/resident's bed dimensions are appropriate based on the patient/resident size (height and weight) prior to installation, to minimize the potential for entrapment.1. Review of R11's undated Resident Face Sheet found in the resident's paper medical record at the nurse's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews and a review of facility dietary policies, revealed the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation of kitchen equipment and overall main-kitchen cleanliness. The facility also failed to properly label leftovers and discard expired foods in 1 of 1 main kitchen. These deficiencies could potentially affect 100 residents who reside in the facility and who consume food from the kitchen. Finding include: A review of facility policy titled, Food Safety In Receiving and Storage with a completed revision date of 6/20/2023 states check expiration dates and use by dates to assure the days are within acceptable parameters. Store food in its original packaging if the packaging is clean, dry, and intact. Place food that is repackaged in a leak proof, pest proof, non-absorbent, sanitary container with tight fitting lid, Label both the container and its lid with the common name of the content, the date it was transferred to the new container, and the discard date. Refrigerated, ready to eat are properly covered, labeled, dated with a use by date. [NAME] them…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)39 and R74 was without unwanted facial hair. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure dignity while R2's catheter bag was exposed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Social Services Policies and Procedures. Subject: Patient/Resident Rights with revision date 06/09/2023 revealed, Policy: The Facility employs measures to ensure patient and resident personal dignity, well-being, and self-determination are maintained .The Facility has established the Patient/Resident [NAME] of Rights and Responsibilities in accordance with state and federal regulations .Resident Rights: A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Review of R39's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R39 was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from hazards, specifically leaving unlabeled medicinal substances at the bedside of 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents and self-administration of medication. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Management Program, with a complete revision date of 05/05/23 states, 10. The authorized staff member or licensed nurse must remain with the resident while the medication is swallowed. Never leave medication in a resident room without order to do so. 16. Once removed from the package or container, unused doses should be destroyed following facility policy and documenting the destruction according to facility policy. Review of R79's Face Sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, but not limited to, psychotic disturbance, syncope and collapse, Spinal stenosis, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, carpal tunnel syndrome,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for two (Resident (R)50 and R33) of two residents reviewed for call light accessibility. This failure had the potential to impact R50 and R33's physical and emotional well-being by limiting his access to call for help in the event of an emergency. Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Call Lights, responding to with a complete revision date of May 5, 2019, revealed When leaving the patient or resident room, ensure the call light is placed within resident/patient ' s reach. Review of R50's Face Sheet located in the hard chart on unit revealed an admission date of 3/29/2021 with medical diagnosis that included cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, colostomy status, dysphagia, and hemiplegia affecting left non dominant side. Review of R50's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/04/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 out of 15, which indicated the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews and facility policy the facility failed to check the placement of a resident's g (gastrostomy)-tube prior to administrating medications for 1 of 3 residents observed during medication pass administration. Resident (R)395 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to traumatic brain injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Medication Management Program, revised May 6, 2023 revealed: The Facility implements a Medication Management program to meet the pharmaceutical needs of patients and residents, according to established standards of practice and regulatory requirements. On 2/06/25 at approximately 8:31 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)3 prepared a watery mixture (approximately 4 ounces) of Haldol Oral Solution 2 mg (milligram)/ml (milliliter) 5 ml (10 mg), gabapentin 100 mg x 2 capsules emptied/crushed, amlodipine 10 mg x 1 tablet crushed and thiamine 100 mg x 1 tablet crushed and proceeded to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy, the facility failed administer oxygen according to physician's orders for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident (R)9, R39, and R3. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Respiratory Policies and Procedures. Subject: Oxygen Therapy with revision date 02/12/2024 revealed, Preparation of Equipment: The licensed nurse is to check the oxygen outlet port to verify flow in accordance with providers order. Procedures: A. Verify the provider's order for the oxygen therapy; all orders for oxygen therapy will include administration modality, liter flow, continuous or as needed (PRN) . Review of R39's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: Functional quadriplegia, cognitive communication deficit, other pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale, pneumonia, unspecified organism, hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-09-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $679K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC