No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

North Las Vegas Care Center

3215 E. Cheyenne Ave., North las Vegas, NV 89030 · For profit - Individual · 182 certified beds · (702) 649-7800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (702) 649-7800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0603) — most recent Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$9,311 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,311 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-01)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2425 N Lamb Blvd Ste 100 · (702) 644-9155 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.3 mi
3030 Las Vegas Blvd N · (702) 642-5318 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2987 N Las Vegas Blvd · (702) 649-7780 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3459 E Cheyenne Ave · (702) 945-4134

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.2%12.6%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.6%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.6%5.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%2.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.5%13.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.0%22.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.2%89.6%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.8%15.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.9%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.5%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine56.4%80.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.9%23.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit1.0%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.731.851.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.431.451.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.4%CMS range 28.6–60.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.0–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting90.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.5–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
47.3%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 182 beds and averages 154.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.484 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-29)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a resident was kept safe from physical abuse for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 159); 2) nursing staff followed up on physician orders and monitored a resident who experienced a change in condition for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 309) ; and 3) incontinence care was provided to 2 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 84) for seven hours. The deficient practice had the potential for the residents to not receive adequate care. Findings include: Resident #159 (R159) R159 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 04/25/2023 with diagnoses including right lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, chronic kidney disease stage III, hypertension, history of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, chronic low back pain with sciatica, diabetes mellitus type 2, history of COVID-19 viral infection, history of bronchitis due to COVID-19, and bilateral eye blindness, status post retinal detachment repair. A Nursing Progress Note dated 04/25/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were not confined to a room and barricaded bed, for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 2 and 3). The deficient practice resulted in residents being confined to bed without consent, placing the residents at risk of psychosocial harm, loss of dignity, and compromised resident rights.Findings include:Resident 2 (R2) was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and history of falling.Resident 3 (R3) was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, intellectual disabilities, and contractures.A review of facility reports revealed on 12/13/2025 at 4:00 AM, the Activities Director entered the building as the manager on duty and during initial rounds noted two residents were barricaded in bed. The report documented the residents had permission to have beds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility which were significant to the residents for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 46) and 6 unsampled residents from the resident council interview. The deficient practice had the potential for the facility to not accommodate the residents' preferences and choices had the potential risk to cause psychosocial distress to the residents.Findings include:The facility had a large patio which was surrounded, in total, by different hallways of the building. The patio contained a large gazebo type structure that was fitted with ceiling fans and a misting type of system. The gazebo contained flower boxes some of the residents used to grow and take care of flowers and other plants. There was a note taped to the doors used to enter/exit this outside area which read: Center Courtyard, Mon-Sun Open: 7:30 AM Close: 5:00PM.Resident 46 (R46) was re-admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was kept safe from abuse for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 166). The deficient practice had the potential for residents to experience emotional distress and physical harm.Findings include:Resident 166 (R166) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fusion of cervical spine, cocaine abuse with cocaine-induced psychotic disorder with hallucinations, depression, and pain.The Administrator was notified on 04/15/2025 of an allegation of abuse which occurred on 04/12/2025. R166 reported that a certified nursing assistant (CNA) was rough when changing the resident's brief. The resident reported the CNA tugged on the resident. The CNA was removed from the resident's care for the remainder of the shift due to the resident and CNA not getting along. When the facility was notified of the allegation of abuse the employee had resigned from the facility. An investigation was conducted, and the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for use of an abdominal binder for a resident who had a history of gastrostomy tube (G-tube) dislodgement for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 12). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for G-tube dislodgement.Findings include:The Person-centered Care Plan policy revised 05/05/2023, documented a baseline care plan would be developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission and would include information necessary to properly care for the resident. R12 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified dementia and gastrostomy (G-tube) status.On 08/26/2025 at 10:07 AM, R12 laid in bed with eyes opened and appeared to be non- verbal. A tube feeding (TF) pump was off, a bottle of Jevity 1.2 and a water bag dated 08/25/2025 were hanging on the TF pump. R12's right hand appeared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised to include identification of the need for oxygen therapy and corresponding interventions for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 41). The deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet respiratory care needs, lack of staff guidance, and inadequate monitoring of oxygen therapy, which could compromise the resident's respiratory status. Findings include:Resident 41 (R41) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pulmonary hypertension and acute chronic systolic heart failure.A Physician Order dated 05/24/2025 and updated on 06/17/2025 directed oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula, with monitoring of oxygen saturation every shift and oxygen tubing and humidification systems be changed weekly.On 08/26/2025 at 12:11 PM, R41 was receiving oxygen at 2.5 liters per minute via nasal cannula. The oxygen tubing was in use and not labeled or dated.The Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were adhered to for timely administration of medications and correct medication preparation and administration technique for medications given via the enteral route for 3 of 40 sampled residents (Residents 10, 15, and 12). The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for adverse effects related to medication errors.Findings include:1) Resident 15 (R15) was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction and gastrostomy status.On 08/27/2025 at 9:26 AM, a medication pass observation revealed R15's the following routine medications were administered to R15:- Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) chewable- Gabapentin 100 mg- Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg- Multi vitamin with IronReview of the medical record revealed R15's medications were scheduled to be administered at 8:00 AM.The Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was provided with nail care and hygiene to contracted hand for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 12). The deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact residents' overall wellbeing.Findings include:The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Optimal Function policy revised 05/05/2023, documented that the facility shall provide necessary care to all residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living on their own to ensure proper nutrition, grooming and hygiene. Resident 12 (R12) was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified dementia and gastrostomy (G-tube) status.On 08/26/2025 at 10:07 AM, R12's right and left hand had long fingernails, approximately one-fourth inch past the nail bed. R12's right hand was severely contracted while left hand had brown matter build-up underneath nails. The Quarterly Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure therapy recommendations for use of a palm guard for a resident with severe hand contracture were transcribed as an order and implemented for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 12). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for worsening contracture and pain.Findings include:R12 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified dementia and gastrostomy (G-tube) status.On 08/26/2025 at 10:07 AM, R12's right hand was severely contracted. A white hand splint was observed on the bedside table.On 08/26/2025 at 10:11 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assigned to R12 indicated not being familiar with R12. The CNA confirmed R12's right hand was severely contracted and there was a white splint device on the bedside table, but the CNA indicated not being familiar with the splint device's wearing schedule.On 08/27/2025 at 8:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and not left at residents' bedside for 2 of 40 sampled residents (Residents 14 and 15). The deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk for adverse reactions to potential medication errors.Findings include:1) Resident 14 (R14) was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of the vertebra and sacral region and Vitamin deficiency.On 8/26/2025 at 8:48 AM, R14 laid awake and alert in bed. A medication cup with two white pills and a red capsule was observed on the bedside table. R14 indicated not being certain what the pills were and could not explain why and who left the medications on the table.On 08/26/2025 at 8:51 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)3 confirmed there was a medication cup with two white pills and a red capsule on R14's bedside table. LPN3 reviewed R14's medications in the medication cart and identified the white…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure foods were stored per recommended standards and ice machines were cleaned in 3 of 4 ice makers in the facility. This deficient practice posed a potential risk to safety and health standards which could lead to contamination and place residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings include:On 08/26/2025 in the morning, a tour of the kitchen was completed with the Dietary Director. There was an open jug containing lime juice in the walk-in cooler with an expiration date of August 25, 2025. There was an unlabeled and undated food item wrapped in aluminum foil stored in the reach in freezer.The Dietary Director explained the lime juice should have been discarded after the expiration date. The item wrapped in aluminum foil was a frozen burrito and should have been labeled and dated.On 08/27/2025 in the morning, a follow-up tour of the kitchen was completed with the Dietary Director. A carton of thickened lemon-flavored water was found stored in the reach in refrigerator that was opened on 08/22/2025 but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment policy was reviewed and updated to reflect new guidance which included the active involvement of direct care staff, input from residents, resident representatives, family members and ensuring there were sufficient number of competent staff to meet the needs of each resident and failed to involve direct care staff in the development of the facility assessment. The deficient practice had the potential to result in an incomplete evaluation of resident population and facility resources, which could affect staffing decisions, training, and availability of services needed to meet resident needs. Findings include: A review of the facility assessment policy dated 2017 revealed the policy had not been updated to include new Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) guidance which included: active involvement of direct care staff and input from residents, resident representatives and family members in developing the facility assessment. The facility assessment tool did not include documentation to show…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the outcomes of resident care and the quality of each resident's life.Findings include:On 08/29/2025 at 12:02 PM, the Administrator was not able to locate the facility specific QAPI plan. The Administrator explained that the facility was using the QAPI policy until the plan could be found.A facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program Committee Guidelines, revised on 09/29/2021, did not identify the requirement of developing a facility specific QAPI Plan containing the processes that will guide the nursing home's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved. The QAPI Plan was used to guide the organizational and facility performance improvement efforts.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain the laundry environment in a sanitary condition by allowing a non-operational dryer located in the clean area of the laundry to accumulate dust inside and on the exterior surfaces. The deficient practice had the potential to contaminate the clean linens and increase the risk of infection for residents.Findings include:On 08/29/2025 at 10:38 AM, the clean area of the laundry room revealed a bank of four commercial dryers. One dryer was non-operational and had visible dust and lint accumulated inside the drum, on exterior surfaces, and in the gap between machines. The dryer was in the clean area of the laundry where clean linens and clothes were processed and stored. On 08/29/2025 at 10:38 AM, the Director of Maintenance described the dryer as moderately dirty with lint and dust build up on inside and outside of machine.On 08/29/2025 at 10:40 AM, the laundry aide indicated the dryer had been broken for at least three years since the laundry aide began working at facility. The laundry aide verbalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was administered timely to 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #2). The deficient practice had a potential for the intended use of the medication to be insufficient or ineffective with a possible cause of harm to the resident. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) R2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease without dyskinesia, chest pain, personal history of transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. A physician order dated 06/07/2024 for Doxycycline Hyclate 100 milligram (mg) tablet was ordered for cellulitis and was to be given at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM. The medication administration record (MAR) revealed the resident missed the 9:00 PM dose on 06/07/2024, both doses on 06/08/2024, and the first dose of the medication was administered on 06/09/2024 at 9:00 AM. The MAR documented the facility was awaiting delivery of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pain medication as requested, assess, and document resident pain level accurately according to physician's order for 1 of 1 unsampled residents (Resident 4). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for ineffective and inadequate pain control. Findings include: Resident 4 (R4) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including angina pectoris, muscle wasting and atrophy, chest pain, absences of right and left leg below the knee, and pain. On 01/30/2025 at 10:23 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN3) verbalized if medication is not available for a resident, a nurse should check the Omnicell (onsite medication dispensing machine) for the medication before waiting for the pharmacy to deliver the medication. On 01/30/2025 at 10:35 AM, the Registered Nurse Unit Manager (RN3) indicated the nurses use the Omnicell often to ensure resident do not go without medication. On 01/30/2025 at 10:42 AM, R4 was lying in bed, alert and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 2 evaluation for newly found changes or diagnosis for 4 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 115, 81, 139 and 119). The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of not being evaluated for appropriate determination of necessary behavioral health services. Findings include: Resident 115 (R115) R115 was admitted on [DATE], with an admitting diagnoses including chronic pancreatitis and blindness. On 08/09/2024 at 9:00 AM, the resident was observed lying in bed. During the introduction, R115 stated not wanting to talk to anyone and sternly ordered to leave the room. On 08/10/2024 and 08/11/2024 in the morning, R115 was observed wheeling self along the hallways while constantly talking to self. R115 was observed stopping at other resident room doorways and continuously talking even with no one inside the room. R115's admission History and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) the physician was notified of a high Vancomycin trough level (laboratory monitoring of Vancomycin to maintain therapeutic blood levels and prevent serious side effects) prior to administration of next dose and, 2) there was a physician order to hold Vancomycin when the nurse decided to not administer the medication during subsequent shift for a resident who was being treated for bacterial pneumonia for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 143). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for ineffective antibiotic therapy and serious side effects. Findings include: Resident 143 (R143) R143 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including intracranial injury with loss of consciousness and bacterial pneumonia. A physician's order dated 09/08/2024, documented to give Vancomycin reconstituted solution 1,000 milligrams (mg) 1.25 grams, intravenously (IV) every eight hours at 8:00 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure care orders were entered and carried out for a colostomy (a surgical opening in the abdomen which provides a means for the collection of waste from the colon) in accordance with the resident care plan and facility policy for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 69). The deficient practice had the potential for introducing infection and negative outcome of residents with a colostomy. Findings include: Resident 69 (R69) R69 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. On 09/09/2024 at 11:30 AM, R69 verbalized receiving care from the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) regarding colostomy however was not sure when the last time the barrier wafer was last changed on the colostomy. The medical record lacked documented evidence of any physician orders for the care and management of colostomy. On 09/10/2024 at 9:45 AM a CNA indicated the CNA would provide basic cleaning care for residents with a colostomy. The CNA would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy (G-tube) care orders were entered and carried out in accordance with facility protocol for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 79). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for G-tube complications including but not limited to infection, malposition and discomfort. Findings include: Resident 79 (R79) R79 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, gastroparesis and gastrostomy malfunction. On 09/09/2024 at 1:34 PM, R79 was awake and able to communicate. A bottle of Glucerna 1.5 and a water bag was hanging on a tube feeding (TF) pump with feeding tube looped around the machine. The Unit Manager indicated R79's enteral feeding schedule was to be started at 7:00 PM and terminated at 7:00 AM. A physician's order dated 05/24/2024, documented to give Glucerna 1.5 at 80 cubic centimeters (cc) per hour for 12 hours via percutaneous endoscopic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater for one unsampled resident (Resident 58) and 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 61). The deficient practice placed other residents at risk for medication errors. Findings include: On 09/10/2024 in the morning, a Medication Administration Pass observation was performed with 32 opportunities observed and revealed three errors. The medication error rate was 9.38%. Resident 58 (R58) R58 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus. On 09/10/2024 at 8:21 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepared and administered the following medications to R58: - Metformin hydrochloride (HCl) 500 milligrams (mg), one tablet - Aspirin 81mg chewable, one tablet - Vitamin B12 500 micrograms (mcg), two tablets - Docusate sodium 100 mg, one tablet - Sennosides with docusate sodium 8.6 mg, two tablets - Thiamine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence influenza and pneumococcal vaccine was provided for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 115 and 81). The deficient practice had a potential to prevent ensuring residents have had the necessary vaccines in fighting off diseases. Findings include: Resident 115 (R115) R115 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic pancreatitis and blindness. R115 Electronic Healthcare Records (EHR) under Preventive Health Care; Vaccinations, Tests & Results documented: No data available. Resident 81 (R81) R81 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including significant for diabetes and neurocognitive disorder. R81 EHR under Preventive Health Care; Vaccinations, Tests & Results documented: No data available. On 09/11/2024 at 12:41 PM, reviewed the EHR with the Infection Preventionist (IP) and confirmed the vaccine records section of the residents were blank. The IP checked the physician's orders and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence Corona Virus 19 (COVID 19) vaccine was provided for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 115 and 81). The deficient practice had a potential to prevent ensuring residents have had the necessary vaccine in fighting off the specific viral disease. Findings include: Resident 115 (R115) R115 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic pancreatitis and blindness. R115 Electronic Healthcare Records (EHR) under Preventive Health Care; Vaccinations, Tests & Results documented: No data available. Resident 81 (R81) R81 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including significant for diabetes and neurocognitive disorder. R81 EHR under Preventive Health Care; Vaccinations, Tests & Results documented: No data available. On 09/11/2024 at 12:41 PM, reviewed the EHR with the Infection Preventionist (IP) and confirmed the vaccine records section of the residents were blank. The IP checked the physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure verbal abuse or neglect allegation was reported to the abuse coordinator and state agency within the prescribed time for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). The deficient practice could have the potential to put the residents at risk of further abuse or neglect, causing emotional distress and harm. Findings include: Resident 1 (R1) R1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including bilateral hearing loss, weakness, difficulty in walking and abnormalities of gait and mobility and cognitive communication deficit. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented a brief interview of mental status score of 5/15, which indicated R1's cognitive status was severely impaired. A facility report, dated 11/01/2023, documented verbal abuse or neglect had occurred on 10/28/2023 at 9:00 PM. A Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA2) had reported Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA1) had yelled and cursed at R1. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record reviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure the allegations of verbal abuse and neglect were thoroughly investigated. The summary of the investigation, outcome or resolution, measures taken, and required documentation were not compiled and maintained for 2 of the 7 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). This deficient practice could potentially compromise the safety and well-being of the residents. Findings include: A facility report, dated 11/01/2023, documented verbal abuse or neglect had occurred on 10/28/2023 at 9:00 PM. Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA2) reported hearing Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA1) yell and curse at Resident 1 (R1). On the same night, Resident 2 (R2) had fallen and remained on the floor for an extended hour before the assigned CNA checked on R2. CNA1 was seen sleeping outside the room of the resident. A Licensed practical Nurse (LPN) walked by the R2's room and observed R2 almost falling again. Upon approaching the sleeping CNA about this issue, the LPN was ignored, and CNA1 returned to sleep. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II referral was completed for 8 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 26, 64, 88, 74, 32, 7, 15, and 4). The deficient practice did not identify residents with a potential need for specialized services after a diagnosis of mental disorder (a clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotional regulation, or behavior). Findings include: The facility's policy titled PASRR Documentation last revised on 11/01/2017, revealed the facility referred all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related condition for PASARR level II review. Resident 26 (R26) R26 was initially admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including dementia. A Nevada PASRR Level I Identification Determination dated 01/09/2020 documented R26 was appropriate for nursing facility placement. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely for 2 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 73 and 128). The deficient practice had the potential to impact treatment efficacy. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Medication Management Program last revised on 05/05/2023, revealed medications were administered no more than one hour before, to one hour after the designated medication pass time. Resident 73 (R73) R73 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including pain, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and on hospice. On 08/30/23 at 9:15 AM, R73 indicated pain medications were consistently administered late by nursing staff. A review of physician orders revealed the following medications were ordered for pain management: - Fentanyl patch, 50 micrograms (mcg) per hour transdermal (through the skin), once every three days with a scheduled administration time of 10:00 AM - Methadone 10 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet every six hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review. The facility failed to ensure podiatry follow up was completed for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident #61). Failure to identify the need for foot care could put the resident at risk of developing a wound or infection and a decrease of sense of well-being. Findings include: Resident 16 (R16) R16 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle wasting, atrophy, and weakness. On 08/30/2023 at 12:16 PM, R16 was observed with bilateral toenails to be long and unkept. R16 was wearing bilateral foot/lower extremity boots and indicated having a history of foot ulcers. The resident indicated the staff were very good in applying the splints but hasn't said or have done anything about the toenails. R16 indicated routinely going out for podiatry visits but hasn't gone for a while. Review of R16's medical record revealed a podiatry consult visit dated 03/15/2023. The consult note documented a follow up appointment with Podiatry in 2 weeks dated for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the restorative nursing services were provided per the therapy recommendations for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 130). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident's further decline in physical functioning. Findings include: Resident 130 (R130) R130 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and other lack of coordination. The Physical Therapy (PT) Discharge summary dated [DATE], documented R130 had reached maximum potential with skilled services. The discharge reason was highest practical level achieved. The discharge recommendations included to refer R130 to restorative program for strengthening exercises on both lower extremities. The Occupational Therapy (OT) Discharge summary dated [DATE], documented R130 had reached maximum potential with skilled services. The discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an unused intravenous (IV) - lock (a thin, flexible tube placed in a vein in your hand or arm) was discontinued for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident #318). The deficient practice had the potential to be a portal of access for any microbial organism causing tissue infection at the insertion site. Finding include: Resident 318 (R318) R318 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including epilepsy and cerebral infarction. On 08/30/2023 at 9:31 AM, R318 was observed with a right forearm IV lock with a double lumen extension. The dressing on the IV lock was dated 08/18/23. R18 nodded no when asked if the IV lock was still being used. There was no IV pump at the bedside. R318's medical record lacked documented evidence of any medications requiring an intravenous access. On 08/31/2023 at 9:01 AM, R 318's right forearm IV lock was still present. A licensed practical nurse (LPN) confirmed the resident was admitted on [DATE] at 10:25PM.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale was completed per the facility's policy (AIMS/a rating scale designed to measure involuntary movements known as tardive dyskinesia which could develop as a side-effect of an antipsychotic medication) for 2 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 77 and 84); and a consent for psychotropic medications was obtained for 2 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 84 and 32). The deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse consequences for the resident's health and well-being. Findings include: Resident 77 (R77) R77 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including history of drug induced subacute dyskinesia and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. The following were the physician's orders for R77's Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication): - 07/30/2023, Risperidone (Risperdal) tablet two milligrams (mg) one tablet via gastric tube at bedtime (qhs/every night at bedtime). - 08/16/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure two multidose medications were labeled accordingly for 1 of 3 medication rooms. The failure to properly identify a discard date of a medication could result in administration of a sub-potent medication. Findings include: On 08/31/2023 at 12:22 PM, observed inside the medication room refrigerator in 300 Hall, was two opened multi-dose vials of Tubersol (Tuberculin PPD) 5 Tuberculin Units (TU)/0.1 milliliters (mL) Solution for injection; (1) lot # 62371 and expires on 10/24, and (2) lot# 57594 and expires on 05/24. Both vials were not labeled as to the open and discard date. On 08/31/2023 at 12:31 PM, the licensed practical nurse (LPN) assigned to the unit confirmed the finding and indicated the opened multi-dose vials of medicine should have been dated with an open and discard date. The LPN indicated multi-dose vials were only valid for use 28 days after opening. On 08/31/2023 at 3:33 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged multidose vials should always be labeled with open and discard date once…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure the refrigerator in 1 of the 3 nourishment rooms was within the recommended temperature to keep cold foods cold. The deficient practice had the potential to impact the well-being of the residents through potential consumption of hazardous food items. On 08/30/2023 at approximately 8:05 AM, the refrigerator in the 200-hall nourishment room had an internal temperature of 48 degrees Fahrenheit. The Dietary Director confirmed the temperature. The refrigerator contained the following food items: - Three small apple sauce containers - Four milk cartons - Three medium sized plastic bags containing resident specific food items One apple sauce container was pulled from the refrigerator which had an internal temperature of 47 degrees Fahrenheit. The Dietary Director confirmed the temperature. On 08/31/2023 at approximately 12:30 PM, the Dietary Director indicated the Dietary Aides were responsible for checking the refrigerator temperatures in the nourishment rooms and reporting any issues. The Dietary Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Record of Death and Mortician's Receipt form was completed for 1 of 3 sampled close records reviewed (Resident 157). The deficient practice had the potential for the facility failing to maintain an accurate and complete record to release the body of a deceased person to the appropriate entity and the resident's record of death. Resident 157 (R157) R157 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE], with diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, burns involving less than 10% of body surface, and poisoning by unspecified narcotics, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter. The Discharge summary dated [DATE], documented R157 was found unresponsive in bed, emergency medical services (EMS) were called while nursing performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). EMS arrived and continued to revive the resident but was unsuccessful, and the resident was later pronounced deceased .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and record review, the facility failed to ensure immunizations were provided and recorded for 5 of 6 sampled residents. (Resident #98, #8, #109, #148 and #139). The failure to administer vaccines poses a risk of a resident to contract communicable diseases. Findings include: 1) Resident 98 (R98) R98 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of osteomyelitis of the vertebrae and major depressive disorder. R98 Preventative Health Care section of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) lacked documented evidence an influenza and pneumococcal vaccine was provided or offered. 2) Resident 8 (R8) R8 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia and unspecified voice and resonance disorder. R8 Preventative Health Care section of the EHR lacked documented evidence a pneumococcal vaccine was provided or offered. 3) Resident 109 (R109) R109 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of enterocolitis and depression. R109 Preventative Health Care section of the EHR lacked documented evidence a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,311 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $9,311 — penalty dated 2023-09-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir at MemorialDenison, TX 1 of 5Bennettsville Health And Rehabilitation CenterBennettsville, SC 1 of 5Calhoun Convalescent CenterSaint Matthews, SC 1 of 5Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the ParkwayCorinth, TX 1 of 5Forest Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation CtrCatonsville, MD 1 of 5Julia Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Lake Emory Post Acute CareInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenwoodGreenwood, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - InmanInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - Rock HillRock Hill, SC 1 of 5Northampton Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenteFrederick, MD 1 of 5Oakbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterSummerville, SC 1 of 5Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOakland, MD 1 of 5Physical Rehabilitation And Wellness Center Of SpaSpartanburg, SC 1 of 5Riverside Health and RehabCharleston, SC 1 of 5San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care CenterRound Rock, TX 1 of 5Springdale Healthcare CenterCamden, SC 2 of 5Berlin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBerlin, MD 2 of 5Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBremond, TX 2 of 5Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCrownsville, MD 2 of 5Faith Healthcare CenterFlorence, SC 2 of 5Falcon Ridge RehabilitationHutto, TX 2 of 5Hillside Heights Rehabilitation SuitesAmarillo, TX 2 of 5Horizon Health And Rehabilitation CenterLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Lancaster Health and RehabilitationLancaster, SC 2 of 5Las Ventanas De SocorroSocorro, TX 2 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenvilleGreenville, SC 2 of 5Midlands Health & Rehabilitation CenterColumbia, SC 2 of 5Mira Vista CourtFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Moran Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWesternport, MD 2 of 5Pavilion at Glacier ValleySlinger, WI 2 of 5Sandy Lake Rehabilitation And Care CenterCoppell, TX 2 of 5Southpointe Healthcare and RehabilitationGreenville, SC 2 of 5Spanish Hills Wellness SuitesLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Terra Bella Health and Wellness SuitesHouston, TX 2 of 5The Pavilion At CreekwoodMansfield, TX 2 of 5Villa Rosa Nursing And Rehabilitation, LLCMitchellville, MD 3 of 5Bridgecrest Rehabilitation SuitesHouston, TX 3 of 5Crimson Heights Health & WellnessHumble, TX 3 of 5Devlin Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCumberland, MD

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THI OF NEVADA II INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/30/2003
MONTES, MISTIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/21/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 3%Other / private 5%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$328per resident / day
operating cost
$9,980per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$350per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nevada
$11,786/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,463/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,241/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295036. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next