No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pavilion at Glacier Valley

1900 American Eagle Drive, Slinger, WI 53086 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (262) 297-6300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (262) 297-6300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1061 E Commerce Blvd · (262) 644-2900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1061 E Commerce Blvd Ste 100 · (262) 644-5246 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1100 E Commerce Blvd
Park
1030 Lou's Way · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.8%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.6%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.5%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened40.6%18.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.6%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.0%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.4%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.4%82.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.4%23.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.1%15.5%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 163 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
26.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 26.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.6%CMS range 55.5–72.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.0%CMS range 11.4–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge26.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge18.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 4.1–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.49
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
49.3%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 74.1 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-17)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and staff education were provided for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 10 sampled residents following two incidents of familial abuse. On [DATE], staff heard Family Member (FM)-G yell at R1 and observed them slap R1 on the arm. On [DATE], staff entered R1's room and observed FM-H with a hand in R1's groin. FM-H was arrested and a no contact order was issued. Information was not posted or available at the nursing station on R1's unit to alert staff that FM-H was not allowed in the building and could not visit R1. In addition, R1's care plan was not updated to alert staff of the abuse and no contact order and the incidents were not documented in R1's medical record. Findings include: The facility's undated Abuse Prevention, Identification & Reporting policy indicates: Residents have the right to be free from: Abuse .Types of Physical Abuse: .slapping .Possible indicators: Bruising .Verbal Abuse: Includes spoken .or gestured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure menus and serving sizes were followed. This practice had the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. On 2/17/26, the lunch menu indicated the vegetable was seasoned broccoli. Residents were served wax beans instead and were not notified of the menu change.On 2/17/26, the lunch menu included a fresh baked roll and cheesecake. Residents with pureed diets did not receive a roll and received applesauce instead of cheesecake. On 2/17/26, residents with consistent carbohydrate diets were served a dinner roll for lunch but were not supposed to receive a dinner roll.On 2/17/26, lunch portion sizes were not followed in accordance with the menu.Findings include:The facility's Menus policy, revised 10/15/25, indicates: The current menu is posted in the facility so it is available to residents and staff. Make appropriate substitutions when items on the menu are not available. Record these substitutions and keep the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. Temperature logs for meal service were not consistently completed. Hand hygiene was not completed appropriately during the lunch meal on 2/17/26.Staff did not consistently test the internal temperatue of the dishwasher. Serving utensils and bowls were not stored properly to prevent contamination.Staff did not consistently document the parts per million (PPM) of the sanitizing solution in sanitizing buckets.Findings include:On 2/15/26 at 9:15 AM, Surveyor completed an initial kitchen tour with [NAME] (CK)-G who was not sure which food code the facility follows. Nursing Home Administration (NHA)-A later informed Surveyor that the facility follows the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code.Temperature Logs:The 2022 FDA Food Code documents at 2-103.11 Person in Charge: The person in charge shall ensure that: I) Employees are properly maintaining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) was notified of a change in condition for 1 resident (R) (69) of 18 sampled residents.R1's primary POAHC was not notified of two new skin abrasions that were discovered on 1/22/26.Findings include: From 2/16/26 to 2/17/26, Surveyor reviewed R69's medical record. R69 had diagnoses including unspecified focal traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness greater than 24 hours with return to pre-existing conscious level, mild neurocognitive disorder due to known physiological condition with behavioral disturbance, diffuse traumatic brain injury without loss of consciousness, subsequent encounter, delusional disorders, and contracture of muscle. R69's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/15/26, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R69 had intact cognition. R69 had an activated POAHC.R69's POAHC document indicated POAHC-M was R69's chosen healthcare agent. The document indicated if POAHC-M…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive resident-centered care plan was implemented for 1 resident (R) (R11) of 1 sampled resident.R11 had a diagnosis of dementia. R11's care plan did not contain goals or interventions for dementia care.Findings include: The facility's Care Plan Process, Person-Centered Care, revised 5/5/23, indicates: The facility will develop and implement .comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care .3. Following Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Guidelines, develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment.From 2/15/26 to 2/17/26, Surveyor reviewed R11's medical record. R11 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure care and treatment was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 residents (R39 and R55) of 17 sampled residents. R39 was hospitalized for low blood sugar from 1/25/26 to 1/29/26. R39's physician orders did not include parameters for notification of high or low blood sugars. R39 continued to have high blood sugars after the hospitalization. The facility did not notify R39's physician or develop a diabetes care plan. R55 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 1/9/26 for significant weight gain, worsening lower extremity edema, and failed outpatient diuretic escalation. Hospital discharge paperwork indicated R55 should have a consistent carbohydrate/no added salt diet with a fluid restriction. A follow-up cardiology appointment indicated R55 should maintain a fluid restriction. A fluid restriction was not implemented for R55.Findings include: The facility's Physician and Other Communication/Change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food preferences were followed for 2 residents (R) (R16 and R58) of 14 sampled residents. R16's meal ticket indicated R16 disliked sausage. R16 was served sausage for lunch on 2/17/26.R58's meal ticket indicated R58 should receive a half cup of super potatoes for lunch. R58 did not receive a half cup of super potatoes for lunch on 2/17/26.Findings include:The facility's Food Preferences: Diet History policy, revised 10/15/25, indicates: .G. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) refers to the preferences list when making the tray ticket and when collecting data.The facility's Therapeutic Diets policy, revised 10/15/25, indicates: .9. Check all trays for accuracy before they are served to residents.From 2/15/26 to 2/17/26, Surveyor reviewed R16's medical record. R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/21/26, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R39) of 4 sampled residents.R39 was on contact precautions due to loose stools. Staff brought R39 to the dining room to eat breakfast and seated R39 at a table with other residents.Findings include:The facility's Transmission Based/Standard Precautions and Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, revised 5/15/23, indicates: Contact Precautions: .O. Protocols: Resident Placement: .b. When a resident is experiencing wound drainage, fecal incontinence, or diarrhea .that can't be contained and there is an increased potential for extensive environmental contamination and risk of transmission of a pathogen. This should be implemented prior to identifying the specific organism. F. The resident should remain in their room for the duration of transmission-based precautions unless for medically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Hospice services during end of life care were coordinated for 1 resident (R1) of 2 sampled residents.On the 9/6/25 AM shift, Hospice Registered Nurse (HRN)-C informed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-E that R1 was actively passing and should not be gotten out of bed. The information was not communicated to PM or night shift staff. R1 was gotten out of bed in accordance with R1's routine by night shift staff who were unaware that R1 was actively passing. Findings include:The facility's Hospice Care policy, dated 5/5/23, indicates: Procedures: .4. To provide continuity of care, the Hospice, nursing home, and resident/representative must collaborate in the development of a coordinated care plan which includes but is not limited to, the following: Interventions that address, as appropriate, the identification of timely, pertinent non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions to manage pain and other symptoms of discomfort .8. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 residents (R) (R6 and R7) of 10 sampled residents. Staff did not ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed during high-contact cares for R6 and R7.Findings include:The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Procedures, revised 5/15/23, indicates: 1. Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) expand the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) (gown and gloves) during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to staffs' hands and clothing. A. EBP will be implemented for all residents with the following: .2. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator) regardless of MDRO colonization status. B. EBP will be implemented during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-12 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not designate a person to serve as the food and nutrition services director who was a certified dietary manager, had a national certification for food service management and safety from a national accrediting body, or had an associates or higher level degree in food service management or hospitality. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Dietary Manager (DM)-N did not have an approved dietary manager or food service manager certification course or other related education. Findings include: During an initial kitchen tour on 11/10/24 at 10:33 AM, Surveyor interviewed DM-N who indicated DM-N had been at the facility for a short time and did not have a dietary manager certification. DM-N indicated DM-N had a ServSafe certification, but was not yet enrolled in an approved course. DM-N also indicated the facility used a part-time Dietitian. On 11/12/24 at 1:41 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A who confirmed DM-N did not have an approved certification course for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. From 11/10/24 to 11/12/24, Surveyor reviewed R12's medical record. R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including obesity, overactive bladder, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and chronic peripheral venous insufficiency. R12's MDS assessment, dated 8/23/24, had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R12 was not cognitively impaired. On 11/10/24 at 12:17 PM, Surveyor interviewed R12 about care at the facility. R12 stated call light response times ranged from ten minutes to one hour. R12 indicated R12 asked for a bedpan which an unnamed CNA would not provide. R12 stated R12 thought the refusal was cruel and inhuman treatment. R12 also indicated R12 asked staff to hold down a bed pan while R12 turned to get off the bed pan. R12 said the CNAs didn't do it which caused the bed pan to spill. R12 indicated sometimes staff didn't change R12's bedding and R12 had to lay on wet bedding for a half hour until night shift staff arrived. On 11/11/24 at 11:39 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure sufficient staffing was provided to meet the needs of 5 residents (R) (R30, R11, R17, R50, and R26) of 25 sampled residents with the potential to affect additional residents. The facility had low staffing on 4/14/24, 5/11/24, 5/12/24, and 6/23/24. On 11/10/24, R30 activated R30's call light for assistance with toileting on multiple occasions. Staff turned off R30's call light without providing assistance. On 11/10/24, R11 activated R11's call light for assistance to bed. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-Y turned off R11's call light and left the room without assisting R11. On 11/10/24, R17 activated R17's call light for assistance to bed. CNA-Z turned off R17's call light and left the room without assisting R17. On 11/10/24, R50 activated R50's call light for an evening snack. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-F turned off R50's call light and left the room without providing a snack. R26 did not consistently receive scheduled showers. Findings include: The facility's Staffing Policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with the facility's policy. One of five medication carts was observed unlocked and unattended in a resident hallway. One of two medication storage rooms contained expired medication and medical supplies. A prescription label on a medication card was not labeled according to the provider's order for 1 resident (R) (R33) observed during medication administration. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 72 residents residing in the facility. On [DATE], a medication cart on the 600 wing was unlocked and unattended. In addition, a cup that contained medication was on top of the cart and a computer screen that contained residents' personal information was open. The medication storage room on the long-term care unit contained expired medication and medical supplies. A medication card for R33 was not labeled according to the physician's order. Findings include:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a call light was within reach for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 25 sampled residents. R1 was dependent on staff for mobility and other cares. During an observation on 11/10/24, R1's call light was not within reach. Findings include: From 11/10/24 to 11/12/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury (TBI), non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites limited to breakdown of skin, pain, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/18/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R1 was not cognitively impaired. The MDS indicated R1 was dependent on staff for mobility and transfers. R1 had alteration in vision due to a TBI. R1 was legally blind and relied on staff to help with items R1 needed. R1's plan of care indicated staff should to explain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a grievance was thoroughly investigated and resolution was provided for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 25 sampled residents. R7 told staff that R7 was missing items from laundry. Staff did not follow the facility's grievance process or follow-up with R7. Findings include: The facility's Missing Items policy, with a review date of 6/9/23, indicates: .5. When personal items are missing, the resident/responsible party is responsible to inform staff immediately and will complete a complaint/grievance form. From 11/10/24 to 11/12/24, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and muscle weakness (generalized). R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/11/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R7 was not cognitively impaired. On 11/10/24 at 12:05 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff, resident and family interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 residents (R) (R67, R17 and R1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for pressure injuries received the necessary care and services to promote healing and/or prevent pressure injuries from developing. R67 had a pressure injury on the right heel. R67 did not have interventions in place that were recommended by the wound care provider. In addition, R67's care plan did not contain the wound care provider's recommendations. R17 developed a pressure injury from oxygen tubing that was not padded. R1 had a self determination care plan that indicated R1 chose to have a urinal propped against R1's scrotal area. R1's care plan did not contain an intervention to monitor for or prevent potential skin injury to R1's scrotal area. Findings include: The facility's Wound care Policies and Procedures, with a revision date of 6/1/15, indicates: Evaluation is the formal process in which wound characteristics, underlying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the appropriate care and services were provided to increase and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for 3 residents (R) (R14, R6, and R7) of 3 sampled residents. R14 did not receive restorative therapy per therapy discharge recommendations. Staff did not correctly enter the recommendations in R14's medical record, therefore, R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not coded correctly. R6 did not consistently receive restorative therapy. R7 did not consistently receive range of motion (ROM) per R7's orders and care plan. Findings include: On 11/11/24, Surveyor requested the facility's policy for restorative services. The facility provided a training that was titled Restorative Nursing Program Quick Start from Fundamental Clinical and Operational Services, LLC 2024 which contained educational slides for the restorative nursing program (RNP). The training indicated: .Care planning: specific detail approaches, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary care and services to prevent a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 resident (R) (R17) of 4 residents reviewed for catheter care. On 11/10/24, R17's uncovered catheter drainage bag was observed on the floor. Findings include: The facility's Catheter-Urinary Catheter, Cleaning and Maintenance Policy and Procedure taken from the Lippincott Nursing Procedures 9th edition (Copyright 2023 with complete revision: May 5, 2023) indicates: Don't place the drainage bag on the floor to reduce the risk of contamination and subsequent catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). From 11/10/24 to 11/12/24, Surveyor reviewed R17's medical record. R17 received Hospice services and had diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3 and recurrent and persistent hematuria (blood in the urine). R17 had a physician order for an indwelling Foley catheter for acute urine retention (dated 10/18/24) and an order for a privacy bag in place every shift (dated 10/18/24). On 11/10/24 at 10:28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R17) of 25 sampled residents received the necessary care and treatment related for oxygen therapy. During an observation on 11/10/24, R17's oxygen tubing did not contain a date or initials to indicate when the tubing was last changed. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen Administration policy, with a revision date of 2/12/24, indicates: Nasal Cannula: Change weekly, when soiled, and on an as needed basis or per state regulations. From 11/10/24 to 11/12/24, Surveyor reviewed R17's medical record. R17 received Hospice services and had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3. R17 had a physician order for 1-6 liters per minute (LPM) of oxygen via nasal cannula. The facility's general nursing orders, dated 7/29/24, indicated: Equipment Oxygen: Change oxygen tubing/nasal cannula/mast/humidification system weekly once a day on Tuesday from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM. On 11/10/24 at 10:38 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medications were administered within the ordered timeframe for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 6 sampled residents. R1's medications were administered late on 7/29/24, 8/2/24, 10/28/24, 10/30/24, and 11/7/24. Findings include: The facility's Medication Management Program policy, with a revision date of 5/5/23, indicates: .7. Medications are administered no more than one hour before to one hour after the designated medication pass time .11. Immediately after administering the medication to the resident, the authorized staff or licensed nurse will return to the medication cart and document medication administration with initials on the MAR (Medication Administration Record). From 11/10/24 to 11/12/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury (TBI), non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites limited to breakdown of skin, pain, and dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure preferences for dietary needs were met for 1 resident (R) (R276) of 25 sampled residents. R276 did not receive consistently receive the dietary preferences that R276 specified to dietary staff. Findings include: Surveyor requested the facility's policy on food preferences and received a Facility Module User Guide for Matrixcare Meal Tracker, dated October 2024. The User Guide indicated how to enter residents' preferences/special requests in the system. On 11/10/24, Surveyor reviewed R276's medical record. R276 had diagnoses including surgical aftercare on digestive system, hyperkalemia, protein calorie malnutrition, and colon cancer. R276's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/3/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R276 was not cognitively impaired. R276's plan of care contained interventions to honor food preferences as feasible. R276 disliked oatmeal, bacon, sausage, and meats not in deli slice form. R276 liked fruit,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R275) of 25 sampled residents. R275 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). R275 did not have EBP signage outside of R275's room to inform staff of infection prevention precautions needed during the provision of care. Findings include: The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Procedures, dated 5/15/23, indicates: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP): 1. EBP expand the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) (gowns and gloves) during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to staff hands and clothing. A. EBP will be implemented for all residents with the following: .2) Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (central lines, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator) regardless of MDRO colonization…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 3 residents (R) (R2, R6, and R7) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. In addition, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the safe handling of drugs and biologicals for 2 (R4 and R7) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. On 7/10/24, R2, R6 and R7's AM medications were administered late. During medication pass on 7/10/24, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN)-E drop R4's aspirin on the floor and dispose of the tablet in the garbage. RN-E also did not administer R4's carvedilol (used to treat high blood pressure). During medication pass on 7/10/24, Surveyor observed Medication Technician (MT)-J dispose of R7's sertraline (used to treat depression) tablet in a Sharps container. Findings include: The facility's Medication Management Program policy, revised 5/5/23, indicates: Discontinuation and Destruction of Medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a physician was notified of a change in condition for 1 resident (R) (R3) of 10 sampled residents. R3's physician was not notified when R3 had a nearly 12 pound weight loss in one week. Findings include: The facility's Weighing the Resident policy, with a revision date of 5/5/23, indicates: .4. If there is an actual 5% or more gain or loss in one month, notify the patient/resident/family, physician, and the Nutrition/Culinary Services Director. Document this notification per facility protocol .8. Percent body weight change is calculated using the following formula: % body weight change = usual weight - actual weight x 100 divided by usual weight. 9. Unplanned and undesired weight variance will be evaluated for significance utilizing the following guidelines: 3% in one week, 5% in 30 days, 7.5% in 90 days, and 10% in 180 days. On 7/10/24, Surveyor reviewed R3's medical record. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were documented, investigated, and thoroughly resolved for 1 resident (R) (R5) of 10 sampled residents. R5's representative submitted grievances to the facility via email or phone on the following dates: 4/7/24, 4/27/24, 5/23/24, 5/29/24, 5/30/24, 5/31/24, 6/19/24, and 6/24/24. The facility did not ensure the grievances were documented, thoroughly investigated, or resolved. Findings include: The facility's Social Services Policies and Procedures, with a revision date of 11/6/23, indicates: Facility leadership acts promptly to understand and resolve complaints and grievances completed in a reasonable expected time frame .Responsibility of Grievance Official .7. Ensure that all written grievance decisions include a summary statement of: The date the grievance was received, the resident's grievance, steps taken to investigate the grievance, pertinent findings or conclusions, decision if the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, corrective action taken or to be taken, the date the decision was issued…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, staff did not immediately report a resident-to-resident physical altercation to Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A per the facility's policy for 2 residents (R) (R7 and R8) of 2 sampled residents. Staff did not report a resident-to-resident altercation between R7 and R8 to NHA-A which delayed a report to the State Agency (SA). Findings include: The facility's undated Leadership Policies and Procedures indicates: .E. Resident-to-resident abuse: Bullying and threats of violence that cause mental anguish .Willful physical touching that leads to harm, mental anguish, or pain .V: Reporting/Response: .w. All alleged violations concerning abuse .are reported immediately to the facility's Abuse Coordinator, the Administrator, and to other officials in accordance with State law including the State Survey and Certification Agency. On 7/10/24, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 had a diagnosis of vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/16/24, had a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a hand splint and passive range of motion (PROM) was provided for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 1 sampled resident . R2's hand splint was not included on R2's care plan. In addition, PROM was not completed as ordered and was not included on R2's care plan. Findings include: On 7/10/24, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (commonly referred to as stroke), hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body), hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body), congestive heart failure (CHF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/12/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 which indicated R2 had moderate cognitive impairment. R2's medical record contained the following physician orders: ~ Compression sleeve left upper extremity (LUE) on in AM and off at hour of sleep -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R6 and R2) of 3 residents received appropriate care and services to increase and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM). R6's therapy screen contained recommendations for staff to assist R6 with restorative exercises. R6's restorative program was not consistently followed. R2's therapy screen contained recommendations for staff to assist R2 with restorative exercises. R2's restorative program was not consistently followed. Findings include: The facility's Restorative Nursing Policies and Procedures, revised 5/1/22, indicated: ROM exercises: 1. Review care plan, determine the following: active or passive ROM exercises, body parts to be exercised, number of repetitions and special instructions; 4. Perform appropriate exercises as directed in the care plan. See techniques for passive range of motion exercises for specific instructions for each body part; 5. After the exercise sessions, report any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medications were administered timely for 3 Residents (R) (R6, R2, and R1) of 5 residents reviewed. R6, R2, and R1's scheduled medications were not administered timely. Findings include: The facility's Medication Management Program, revised 5/5/23, indicated: Authorized staff must understand the 8 rights for administering medication .4. The right time .Medications are administered no more than one hour before to one hour after the designated medication pass time . 1. On 1/16/24, Surveyor reviewed R6's medical record. R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including chronic pain syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and ataxia unspecified. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/23, documented R6's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 out of 15 which indicated R6 was not cognitively impaired. On 1/16/24 at 9:34 AM, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN)-F administer the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. The facility did not ensure the proper handling and storage of linens to prevent the spread of infection. This has the potential to affect multiple residents (R) in the facility. In addition, staff did not complete appropriate hand hygiene during the provision of care for R330. The top and side of a storage rack used for clean resident linens contained dust and debris. In addition, Surveyor observed clean linens touch the floor during the folding process. Staff did not complete appropriate hand hygiene during the provision of care for R330. Findings include: The facility's Laundry policy, dated 3/2006, contained the following: ~All Linens: 1. Linens are to be handled in a safe manner to prevent contamination of the linen, the personnel, and the environment. Clean Linen: 5. Covers used to protect clean linen are clean and in good…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure protective placement was obtained for 1 Resident (R) (R25) of 1 sampled resident. R25 had a legal guardian. The facility did not file a petition for protective placement when R25's stay at the facility exceeded 60 days from admission on [DATE]. Findings include: WI state statute chapter 55.055(1)(b) contains the following information: The guardian of an individual who has been adjudicated incompetent may consent to the individual's admission to a nursing home or other facility not specified in par. (a) for which protective placement is otherwise required for a period not to exceed 60 days. In order to be admitted under this paragraph, the individual must be in need of recuperative care or be unable to provide for his or her own care or safety so as to create a serious risk of substantial harm to himself or herself or others. Prior to providing that consent, the guardian shall review the ward's right to the least restrictive residential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated for 1 Resident (R) (R40) of 2 sampled residents. On 9/25/23, R40 was found on the floor and initially refused an injury assessment. Later in the day, staff noted R40 had a laceration on the left arm that required 19 sutures. The facility did not conduct a thorough investigation related to R40's injury of unknown origin. Findings include: Facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Mistreatment with no noted revision dated indicated: 1. The facility's Leadership prohibits neglect, mental, physical and/or verbal abuse, use of a physical and/or chemical restraint not required to treat a medical condition, involuntary seclusion, corporal punishment, and misappropriation of a patient's/resident's property and/or funds and ensures that alleged violation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment data was completed, encoded, and transmitted timely for 1 Resident (R) (R6) of 3 residents reviewed. R6's MDS assessment, dated 10/25/23, did not have a completed transmission as of 12/12/23. Findings include: Chapter 5 of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, dated October 2023, indicates: .Nursing homes are required to submit Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) required Minimum Data Set (MDS) records for all residents in Medicare- or Medicaid-certified beds regardless of the payer source .When the transmission file is received by iQIES, the system performs a series of validation edits to evaluate whether or not the data submitted meet the required standards. MDS records are edited to verify that clinical responses are within valid ranges and are consistent, dates are reasonable, and records are in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 2 Residents (R) (R50 and R3) of 3 residents reviewed for MDS completion. R50's medical record contained a Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II, dated 5/12/22, that indicated R50 met the federal definition of a serious mental illness. R50's MDS assessment, dated 5/12/23, was incorrectly coded for the question, Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or related condition? R3's medical record contained a PASRR Level II, dated 2/8/22, that indicated R3 met the federal definition of a serious mental illness. R3's MDS assessment, dated 4/19/23, was incorrectly coded for the question, Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or related condition? Findings include: The Centers for Medicare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R330) of 3 sampled residents received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs). R330 had a suprapubic catheter (a catheter inserted in the bladder through a small hole in the abdomen) and a history UTIs. R330's plan of care indicated R330's catheter drainage bag should be emptied every 2 hours which was not consistently completed. Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): A urinary tract infection (UTI) is an infection involving any part of the urinary system, including urethra, bladder, ureters, and kidney. UTIs are the most common type of healthcare-associated infection reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). On 12/12/23, Surveyor reviewed R330's medical record. R330 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis, UTIs, resistance to multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Physician visits were timely for 1 Resident (R) (R27) of 1 resident reviewed. R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R27 not seen by a Physician or Nurse Practitioner every 60 days as required. Findings include: The facility's Leadership Policies and Procedures indicates in Section VI: Medical Services 2. The physician visits the patient/resident according to the following guidelines: Every months for three months and every 60 days thereafter, or more often as clinically driven. On 12/11/23, Surveyor reviewed R27's medical record. R27 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), chronic kidney disease stage 4, depression, anxiety, diabetes mellitus type 2, respiratory failure with hypoxia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and pulmonary hypertension. R27 also had a pacemaker. R27's medical record contained fax and telephone communication between the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure monitoring for adverse consequences of high-risk medications for 2 Residents (R) (R52 and R3) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R52 was prescribed tramadol and hydrocodone-acetaminophen (both high-risk medications in the opioid class used to treat moderate to severe pain). R52's care plan did not contain monitoring for adverse consequences of tramadol or hydrocodone-acetaminophen. R3 was prescribed tramadol. R3's care plan did not contain monitoring for adverse consequences of tramadol. Findings include: 1. On 12/11/23, Surveyor reviewed R52's medical record. R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (also known as stroke; a brain lesion in which a cluster of brain cells die when they don't get enough blood). R52's medical record contained the following physician orders: ~Hydrocodone-acetaminophen - Schedule II tablet; 5-325 mg (milligrams); 1 tablet; oral every 6 hours - PRN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R58) of 5 sampled residents was free from a significant medication error. R58 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a hospital discharge order to take one 125 milligram (mg) capsule of vancomycin (an antibiotic) every 12 hours for 7 days. The order was transcribed without an end date and R58 received vancomycin through 12/12/23. Findings include: Center for Disease Control (CDC) web page Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship, updated of [DATE], indicates: Improving antibiotic prescribing and use is critical to effectively treat infections, protect patients from harms caused by unnecessary antibiotic use, and combat antibiotic resistance. The facility's Physician Orders policy, with a revision date of 5/5/23, contained the following information: The qualified licensed nurse completes an admission medication regimen review from the transfer record from an acute care hospital, home, or other entity. From…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide the opportunity for 1 (R1) of 2 Residents reviewed to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care by not facilitating the inclusion of R1 in the care planning process. Findings Include: Surveyor requested a facility policy and procedure on the care planning process for Residents and was not provided a policy during the survey process. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Unspecified Focal Traumatic Brain Injury with Loss of Consciousness, Primary Carnitine Deficiency, Muscle Weakness, Overactive Bladder, Morbid Obesity, Lymphedema, Anxiety, Delusional Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder of Bipolar Type, and Other Schizophrenia. R1 is currently R1's own person. R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score to be a 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact for daily decision making. R1's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person- centered care plan for 1 (R2) of 5 residents reviewed. R2 did not have a comprehensive care plan addressing impaired skin integrity, pressure injuries, or risk for falls when admitted to the facility. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Nursing Policy and Procedures: Care Plan Process, Person-Centered Care, revised on 5/5/2023, states: The facility will develop and implement a baseline and comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. Person- centered care means the facility focuses on the resident as the center of control and supports each resident in making his or her own choices. Person-centered care includes trying to understand what each resident is communicating, verbally and nonverbally, identifying what is important to each resident with regard to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure quality of care was provided for 1 (R1) of 5 Residents. R1 was not wearing a compression glove on his right hand according to physician orders on 10/3/23 & 10/4/23. Findings include: R1's diagnoses includes traumatic brain injury, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, legally blind, and lymphedema. The quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an assessment reference date of 7/19/23 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 15 which indicates cognitively intact. R1 is assessed as not have any behaviors including refusal of cares. R1 is assessed as requiring extensive assistance with one person physical assist for dressing. The physician order's dated 7/26/23 documents To RUE (right upper extremity) Compression glove to help with finger swelling. Double the tetra grip of the hand. If uncomfortable use 2 layer tetra grip, layer tetra grip with glove, or 2 layer tetra grip with glove twice daily. On 10/3/23 at 9:06 a.m. Surveyor observed R1 sitting in a broda chair at a table being fed breakfast by CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free from accident hazards and were provided supervision and assistive devices to prevent avoidable accidents for 3 (R2, R4, and R5) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. * R2 did not have fall interventions in place for falls that occurred on 1/4/2023, 1/6/2023, and 1/7/2023. R2 did not have an investigation or root cause analysis done for a fall on 4/18/2023. * R4 did not have an investigation or root cause analysis done for a fall on 6/29/2023. * R5's bed was observed not at the lowest level as identified as a fall prevention in R5's care plan. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Nursing Policies and Procedures: Fall Management, revised on 5/5/2023, states: 1. The facility will identify each patient/resident who is at risk for falls and will plan care and implement interventions to manage falls. 2. Qualified staff will complete the Fall Risk Evaluation to determine if patient/resident is a fall risk. 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received routine drugs or obtain them as ordered for 1 (R1) of 5 residents. On 02/13/23, R1 was prescribed Levocarnitine three times per day (8:00 AM, 12:00 noon, and 8:00 PM), by their Medical Doctor (MD). R1 did not receive Levocarnitine as ordered on 6/6/23, 6/7/23, 6/8/23 and 6/9/23 before the Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified and the Levocarnitine put on hold. Findings Include: The facility policy, entitled, Pharmacy Services Policies and Procedures, dated 04/01/22, states: Section 3 0 General Information Subject: 3.1 Provision of Pharmacy Services Policy: 1. The Facility will ensure that the provision of pharmaceutical services meets the needs of the residents for prescription and non-prescription medications, infusion therapy and equipment, supplies and services as they relate to pharmacy. Procedures: 1. The facility maintains current up-to-date facility and provide pharmacy policy and procedures pertaining to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based in interview, and record review the facility did not ensure and as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication was not utilized more than 14 days unless an alternate duration with rationale was provided for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for psychotropic medication use. R2's PRN Lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication) order was not discontinued after 14 days or obtained an alternate duration with rationale. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Pharmacy Services Policy and Procedures: Medication Management- Use of Psychotropic Drugs, revised on 5/24/2022, states: 1. A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. 2 D. PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except . if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for PRN order. E. PRN orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-06-11 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not post required direct care staffing levels in a timely or accurate manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility.The 6/11/26 daily direct care staff was not posted in a timely manner. In addition, daily direct care staff postings did not list the hours worked per shift or correct shift times. Findings include:The facility's Posting of Licensed and Unlicensed Direct Care Staff policy, revised 11/1/17, indicates: The Director of Nursing (DON) or designee shall post the direct care staffing on a daily basis .1. Direct care staffing for licensed and unlicensed staff is posted on a daily basis. 2. Data requirements for posting include the following information: .C. The total number and actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: 1) Registered Nurses (RNs); 2) Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs); 3) Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs); .A. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir at MemorialDenison, TX 1 of 5Bennettsville Health And Rehabilitation CenterBennettsville, SC 1 of 5Calhoun Convalescent CenterSaint Matthews, SC 1 of 5Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the ParkwayCorinth, TX 1 of 5Forest Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation CtrCatonsville, MD 1 of 5Julia Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Lake Emory Post Acute CareInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenwoodGreenwood, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - InmanInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - Rock HillRock Hill, SC 1 of 5Northampton Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenteFrederick, MD 1 of 5Oakbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterSummerville, SC 1 of 5Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOakland, MD 1 of 5Physical Rehabilitation And Wellness Center Of SpaSpartanburg, SC 1 of 5Riverside Health and RehabCharleston, SC 1 of 5San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care CenterRound Rock, TX 1 of 5Springdale Healthcare CenterCamden, SC 2 of 5Berlin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBerlin, MD 2 of 5Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBremond, TX 2 of 5Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCrownsville, MD 2 of 5Faith Healthcare CenterFlorence, SC 2 of 5Falcon Ridge RehabilitationHutto, TX 2 of 5Hillside Heights Rehabilitation SuitesAmarillo, TX 2 of 5Horizon Health And Rehabilitation CenterLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Lancaster Health and RehabilitationLancaster, SC 2 of 5Las Ventanas De SocorroSocorro, TX 2 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenvilleGreenville, SC 2 of 5Midlands Health & Rehabilitation CenterColumbia, SC 2 of 5Mira Vista CourtFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Moran Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWesternport, MD 2 of 5North Las Vegas Care CenterNorth las Vegas, NV 2 of 5Sandy Lake Rehabilitation And Care CenterCoppell, TX 2 of 5Southpointe Healthcare and RehabilitationGreenville, SC 2 of 5Spanish Hills Wellness SuitesLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Terra Bella Health and Wellness SuitesHouston, TX 2 of 5The Pavilion At CreekwoodMansfield, TX 2 of 5Villa Rosa Nursing And Rehabilitation, LLCMitchellville, MD 3 of 5Bridgecrest Rehabilitation SuitesHouston, TX 3 of 5Crimson Heights Health & WellnessHumble, TX 3 of 5Devlin Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCumberland, MD

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THI OF WISCONSIN, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/30/2003
GORDON, DAWNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/26/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$551K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 10%Other / private 27%

This home reported $551K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$373per resident / day
operating cost
$11,328per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$391per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525461. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next