No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the Parkway

3511 Corinth Parkway, Corinth, TX 76208 · For profit - Corporation · 134 certified beds · (940) 270-3400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 20234 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3504 Corinth Pkwy Ste 150 · (940) 498-4445 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Omnicare1.4 mi
7801 Stemmons Fwy · (940) 382-1166 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Begshop0.1 mi
4831 LaCroix · (817) 914-8142 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3700 Park Wood Ct · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5920 S I-35E

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.6%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.6%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.2%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.8%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.1%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.2%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine68.5%88.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.4%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.8%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.582.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.622.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

69.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
49.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.50U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 49.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF69.7%CMS range 61.3–78.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.0–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge49.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting85.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge93.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 3.3–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
66.2%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 70.1 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 64 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-30)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the physical status, and when a decision for transfer of the resident from the facility was made for one (Resident #5) of 24 residents reviewed for notification of changes and transfer of the resident from facility to hospital. 1. The facility failed to have any physician orders for medications to control blood sugar for more than one month (1/27/23-2/28/23) for Resident #5 (diagnosed with Diabetes Type 2). 2. The facility failed to notify the physician of high blood sugar levels (greater than 300 mg/dL) on multiple occasions between 1/28/23-2/28/23 for Resident #5. 3. The facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #5 showed signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia. 4. The facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #5 was transferred to the hospital with a blood sugar of 537 mg/dL (normal range is 70-110 mg/dL). 5.The facility failed to follow their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-03-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect when the facility failed to provide care and services for treatment of diabetes for one resident (Resident #5) of 24 residents reviewed for neglect. Resident # 5 did not receive oral medications and insulin for treatment of diabetes from 01/27/23 to 02/28/23. The facility failed to have a system in place to ensure: 1) Physician orders were in place for medications to control blood sugar for more than one month (1/27/23 2/28/23) for Resident #5 (diagnosed with Diabetes Type 2). 2) Treatment was provided for elevated blood sugars equal to or greater than 300 mg/dL on multiple occasions for Resident #5. 3) Their policy of notifying the physician for elevated blood sugars equal to or greater than 300 mg/dL for Resident #5. 4) Treatment was provided when Resident #5 showed signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia. This failure resulted in Resident #5 having high blood sugars for one month…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0635 — pattern
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had admission physician orders for their immediate care for two residents (Resident #5 and Resident #173) of 24 residents reviewed for admitting physician orders. 1. The facility failed to reconcile hospital discharge orders for diabetes medication (insulin sliding scale) upon Resident #5's readmission to the facility from the hospital on 1/27/23. 2. The facility failed to have any physician orders for medications to control blood sugar for more than one month (1/27/23-2/28/23) for Resident #5 (diagnosed with Diabetes Type 2). 3. The facility failed to have physician orders for treatment of high blood sugar levels (greater than 300 mg/dL) on multiple occasions between 1/28/23-2/28/23 for Resident #5. 4. The facility failed to physician orders when Resident #5 showed signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia. This failure resulted in Resident #5 having no orders for diabetes medication, and no orders for the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (Resident #5) of 24 residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to have any physician orders for medications to control blood sugar for more than one month (1/27/23-2/28/23) for Resident #5 (diagnosed with Diabetes Type 2). 2. The facility failed to notify the physician of high blood sugar levels (greater than 300 mg/dL) on multiple occasions between 1/28/23-2/28/23 for Resident #5. 3. The facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #5 showed signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia. 4. The facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #5 was transferred to the hospital with a blood sugar of 537 mg/dL (normal range is 70-110 mg/dL). 5. The facility failed to follow their policy of physician notification of elevated blood sugars great…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards and each resident received adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility did not implement interventions per the Speech Therapist and the Nurse Practitioner when they did not provide recommendations of occasional supervision, upright posture during meals and upright posture for greater than 30 minutes after meals for Resident #1 on 3/7/26 after a choking incident. The facility failed to implement the interventions of occasional supervision, upright posture during meals and upright posture for greater than 30 minutes after meals recommended by the speech therapy to help prevent choking episodes for Resident #1 after she was discharged from speech therapy. These failures could put residents at risk of frequent accidents and decline in health.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet date 4/28/26 reflected an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 1 of 1 centralized staff work area reviewed for resident call system.The facility failed to ensure they had a working call light system that was audible at the centralized staff work area (nurses' station).This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance for activities of daily living or in the event of an emergency.During an observation and interview on 04/16/26 at 8:05 a.m., Resident # 6 was heard yelling I need help to get up, I need help. The call light was illuminated but no audible sound was heard. LVN L was observed walking down the hallway and entered Resident #6's room and asked him to stop yelling. Resident #6 stated he was sorry but stated he had been waiting for 45 minutes for someone to come and help him. LVN L stated it had not been 45 minutes. LVN L…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0635 — pattern
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have Physician Orders for the resident's immediate care for one of two (Resident #1) reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to have Physician orders for the care and treatment for Resident #1's foley catheter, colostomy, and wound care orders upon his readmission to the facility on [DATE]. This failure could place resident at risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated Face Sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's 5-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact, had a urinary catheter, colostomy (surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen to the colon) and abscess (collection of pus and dead tissue) to the groin (junction area between the lower abdomen and inner thigh) and perineum (area between the anus and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all medications to meet the needs of each resident for one of four (Residents #4) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was free from abuse when ADON E knowingly placed the following medications on hold without a physician's order: Resident #4's Latanoprost 0.005% eye drops prescribed for once per day, on hold from [DATE] until [DATE], 25 doses were missed.2. Resident #4's Dorzolamide 2% eye drops prescribed for two time a day, on hold from [DATE] until [DATE], 47 doses were missed. 3.The facility failed to ensure MA H cleared Resident #4's nasal passages before the administration of Fluticasone Nasal Spray. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic dosage of medication. Findings included: 1. Review of a Face Sheet for Resident #4 dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was an [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for one (Resident #4) of 13 residents reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was free from significant medication errors when the following were placed on hold:-Latanoprost 0.005% eye drops prescribed for once per day on hold without physician's order on [DATE] until [DATE], 25 doses were missed.-Dorzolamide 2% eye drops prescribed for two times a day on hold without physician's order on [DATE] until [DATE], 47 doses were missed. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic benefits from their medication.Findings Included:Review of a Face Sheet for Resident #4 dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility originally on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 was diagnosed with Bilateral Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (chronic, progressive eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of seven (Resident #5 and Resident #6) residents observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure the Treatment Nurse performed hand hygiene during wound care for Resident #5 on 04/15/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN L utilized Enhanced Barrier Precautions while transferring Resident #6 from bed to wheelchair and wheelchair to toilet on 04/16/26 and failed to perform hand hygiene before leaving the room. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination.Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #5's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE], diagnosis included acute embolism and thrombosis of right tibial vein (blood clot lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two of six (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to include, in the care plan for Resident #1 created on 03/18/26, and revised on 04/15/26, the colostomy and the necessary care and interventions. 2. The facility failed to include, in the care plan for Resident #2 last revised on 04/06/26, the midline catheter inserted on 03/27/26, and the necessary care and interventions. These failures could place residents at risk of the facility by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's undated Face Sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received parenteral fluids administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for one of two residents (Resident #2) reviewed for peripheral intravenous care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Agency LVN K obtained physician's orders for the removal of Resident #2's midline intravenous catheter on 04/04/26. 2. The facility failed to document the removal of Resident #2's midline catheter on 04/04/26. These failures placed the resident at risk of ensuring the midline was removed properly and intact which could lead to infection and embolism, and communicated with oncoming staff for further monitoring.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's undated Face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old-femle admitted [DATE]. Diagnosis included encephalopathy (disturbance of brain function) cellulitis (bacterial infection of the skin), urinary tract infection, and pressure ulcers. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 5 (100 Hall nurse medication cart) medication carts reviewed for medication storage:The facility failed to ensure all medication including insulin pen were not left unsecure and unattended on the 100 hall nurse medication cart. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to adverse drug reactions or drug diversions. Findings included:During an observation on 04/15/2026 at 12:02 PM, the Hall 100 nurses medication cart was observed to have an insulin pen, lancets and glucometer strips sitting out on top of the medication cart. The medication cart was locked and there was no nurse or staff member at the medication cart, four different staff members were observed to walk past the medication cart . During an observation and interview on 04/15/2026 at 12:09 PM, revealed RN B was walking from down the hallway from a resident room. RN B walked up to the 100 Hall nurse medication cart,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete, accurately documented and systematically organized for two of four (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for clinical documentation. 1. The facility failed to ensure staff documented Resident # 1's wound care on the MAR/TAR, that was provided or declined, from 04/11/26 through 04/14/26.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's foley catheter physician order reflected the foley catheter size, the amount required for the [NAME], and the rationale for its use. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving treatments as ordered which could impact the residents' health and recovery. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's undated Face Sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's 5-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Medication Cart Hall 100) of 4 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse A counted controlled drugs every change of shift and signed the medication sheet form after the count while she was responsible for the Medication Cart on Hall 100.The failure could place residents at risk of not having the medication available due to possible drug diversion.Findings Included:Record review of the Medication Cart on Hall 100's medication count sheet on 02/26/26 at 10:16 AM revealed missing signatures for shift change counts for Off duty and On duty for 02/03/26, 02/06/26, 02/08/26, and 02/12/26.Interview on 02/26/26 at 2:15 PM, Director of Nursing B stated the staff were trained by a nurse to perform counts at the beginning and end of their shift on the medication cart that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications according to physician's orders for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medications. The facility failed to follow Physician D's order by applying a second Lidocaine patch by accident to Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of harm by not receiving their medication as instructed by physician. Findings included: Review of the Care Plan dated 02/09/2026 for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus is a virus that attacks the body's immune system which can lead to AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome), Seizures, Hypokalemia (Low potassium levels), Cellulitis (Bacterial skin infection), Anxiety (Excessive worry or unease), Vitamin deficiency, Muscle Weakness, Neuralgia (Intense sudden and sever facial pain), Neuritis (Nerve or inflammation of the nervous system), Candidal balantis (Inflammation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident#1) of 9 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had facial hair on her chin removed on 01/07/2026. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia (types of cognitive decline not caused by Alzheimer's disease), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Resident #1's BIMS score was a 13, which indicated Resident #1's cognition was intact. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #1 partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA C changed gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination.Findings include: A record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/19/25, reflected Resident #2 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included hypertension (elevated blood pressure), fracture of part of neck of left femur, muscle wasting and atrophy, and Muscle weakness (generalized). Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #2 was frequently incontinent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure: LPN A and CNA C wore appropriate PPE when transferring Resident #1 on EBP isolation from bed to wheelchair on 11/04/25. CNA B wore appropriate PPE, and performed proper hand hygiene between gloves change during incontinent care for Resident #2 on 11/04/25. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness.1-Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/14/25, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE], and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 15, meaning her cognition was intact. She was completely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to ensure they self-reported neglect for Resident #1. Resident #1 fell and had to call EMS to help him get off the floor on 08/10/25. This failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility had evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to ensure they investigated an allegation of neglect for Resident #1. Resident #1 fell and had to call EMS to help him get off the floor on 08/10/25. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their allegations for neglect investigated which could lead to additional neglect. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 08/07/25, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His BIMS score was 15 indicating his cognitive ability was intact. His diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's disease and unsteadiness on feet. The resident required maximum assistance to transfer between surfaces.Record review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #1. Resident #1 fell and had to call EMS to help him get off the floor on 08/10/25. This failure could place residents at risk for injury for not having adequate supervision. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 08/07/25, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His BIMS score was 15 indicating his cognitive ability was intact. His diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's disease and unsteadiness on feet. The resident required maximum assistance to transfer between surfaces. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan, dated 08/26/25, reflected: Resident is at risk for falling related immobility, muscle weakness, diabetes, and chronic pain.Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 5 (Resident #20, Resident #59, Resident #51, Resident # , Resident #13 ) of 16 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1- Resident #59 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 5/28/25. 2- Resident #20 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 5/28/25. 3- Resident #51 had his nails trimmed and cleaned on both hands on 05/28/25. 4- Resident #13 had her fingernails trimmed. 5- Staff provided consistent showers/baths for Resident #21. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1-Record review of Resident #59's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #59 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #31) of two residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility failed to ensure CNA C provided timely and appropriate perineal care for Resident #31. This failure could place residents at risk for the development and/or worsening of urinary tract infections and skin breakdown. Findings include: Record review of Resident #31's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/13/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 12/07/21 with diagnoses included down syndrome (a genetic disorder causing developmental and intellectual delays), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #31 had a BIMS score of 03 which indicated cognition was severely impaired. Resident #31 required moderate assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 2 (Hall 200 and 300) of 4 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure: RN E responsible for Medication Cart Hall 200, counted controlled drugs every change of shift and singed the narcotic sheet form after the count. RN D responsible for Medication Cart Hall 300, counted controlled drugs every change of shift and singed the narcotic sheet form after the count. These failures could place residents at risk of not having the medication available due to possible drug diversion. Findings Included: Record review of the Medication Cart Hall 200 narcotic count sheet on 05/28/25 at 10:16 AM of , revealed missing signatures for Off duty and On duty for 05/09/25, 05/15/25, 05/21/25, and 05/22/25. Record review of the Medication Cart Hall 300 narcotic count sheet, on 05/28/25 at 10:30 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility reach in refrigerator were dated, labeled, and covered. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included: Observations on 5/28/25 at 9:30AM in the facility walk-in freezer revealed: Frozen French fries were not dated. Frozen southern style biscuit dough was left uncovered in a plastic bag, that was in an open cardboard box. Observation on 5/28/25 at 9:33 AM in the facility dry storage revealed: 3 hamburger buns wrapped in a plastic bag not dated or labeled. In an interview on 5/29/25 at 12:30 PM, the Dietary Manager revealed she expected all food items in the kitchen should be dated, labeled, and covered and everyone including cooks and herself were responsible for covering,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 3 resident (Resident #1 and Resident #11, and Resident #44) of 10 residents observed for infection control. 1-The facility failed to ensure MA A disinfected the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Resident #1 and Resident #11 on 05/28/25. 2- The facility failed to ensure CNA J and CNA K performed proper hand hygiene when changing gloves during morning care for Resident #44 05/29/25. 3- The facility failed to ensure CNA J and agency CNA K wore appropriate PPE when providing morning care for Resident #44 who supposed to be on EBP on 05/29/25. The failures could place residents at-risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/09/25, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure completion of a discharge summary including a recapitulation of the resident's stay, and final status at discharge for two residents (Resident #69 and Resident #170) of five residents reviewed for discharge summary. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary for Resident #69 and Resident #170. This failure could place residents at risk of not having complete records after permanent discharge from the facility and disruption in the continuity of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #69's face sheet dated 05/29/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 3/15/25 with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), encephalopathy (disease affecting the brain leading to impaired brain function), cerebral ischemia (inadequate oxygen supply to the brain), bradycardia (lower than normal heart rate), Unspecified protein calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of twenty-four residents (Resident #45) reviewed for falls. The facility failed to follow the facility policy and did not promptly notify Resident #45's physician about a fall incident that occurred on 05/12/25 at 8:32 am. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in treatment and diagnosis of new symptoms resulting in serious illness, hospitalization, and further decline in the resident's condition,. Findings included: Record review of Resident #45's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #45 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified open-angle glaucoma, muscle wasting and atrophy (the loss or thinning of muscle tissue), polyneuropathy (nervous system disorder), restless legs syndrome, functional dyspepsia (discomfort or pain in the upper abdomen), repeated falls,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 (Resident #221) residents reviewed for respiratory care, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #221's Oxygen humidification bottle and nasal cannula tubing was changed in a timely manner. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. The findings were: Review of Resident # 221's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses include Stroke ( blood supply to the brain interrupted ), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Pneumonia (infection of the lungs ), and Diabetes mellitus (high blood glucose). Resident #221 was on continuous Oxygen therapy on admission to the facility. Resident #221 had BIMS of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy during administering medication for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #2) reviewed for privacy in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN A provided privacy by closing the door and privacy curtain for Resident #2 on 1/1/25. This failure could place residents at risk of diminished quality of life. The findings include: Record Review of Resident #2's MDS Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident had BIMS score of 6 which indicated Resident #2 had severe cognitive deficit. Her diagnoses included nontraumatic brain dysfunction, hypertension (high blood pressure), Diabetes Mellitus (high blood glucose), Hyperlipidemia (high blood lipids), non-Alzheimer's dementia, Blindness right eye. Record Review of Resident #2's Physician orders dated 6/26/24 reflected, Lantus Solostar U-100 Insulin pen; 100 unit/ml (3mL), amount 15 units,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and measures were taken to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, and report the results within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate, corrective action must have been taken for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to report findings to the state agency within five days for an allegation of neglect made on 1/2/25. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their allegations investigated or reviewed timely by the state survey agency. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's MDS Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/6/2025. Resident had BIMS of 9 which indicated Resident #1 had moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. LVN A failed to complete fall assessment after Resident #1 had a witnessed fall in the facility on 1/1/25. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries related to falls. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance (PNC). The noncompliance began on 01/1/25 at 8:13 PM and ended on 01/02/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the Incident investigation began. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #1's MDS Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/6/2025. Resident had BIMS of 9 which indicated Resident #1 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Residents #1 and Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for infection control. 1.LVN A failed to perform hand hygiene and changed gloves while administering medications to Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 1/1/2025. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for spread of infection through cross-contamination of pathogens and illness. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #1's MDS Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/6/2025. Resident had BIMS of 9 which indicated Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment. Her diagnoses included nontraumatic brain dysfunction, hypertension (high blood pressure), Diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the residents' right to review survey results were readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure survey results were located and placed in a readily accessible location where individuals wishing to examine survey results without having to ask to review them. The facility failed to ensure residents were informed of their right to view survey results. This failure could affect residents who reside in the facility and could result in a lack of awareness for visitors, family, and residents regarding the survey results and the plan of correction submitted by the facility. The findings were: The confidential group meeting at 11:00 a.m. on 4/17/24, revealed residents were not aware of the location of the results of Federal or State surveys nor were they aware of their right to review the results of these surveys. In an interview at 2:07 p.m. on 04/17/24, the Activities Director said he thought the results…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #270 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violation of abuse and neglect were thoroughly investigated for 2 (Resident #370 and Resident # 270) of 17 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property, in that; 1- The facility failed to conduct investigation following self-report of neglect allegation for unwitnessed fall for Resident #370. 2- The facility failed to conduct investigation following self-report of neglect allegation report to the administrator attention by Resident #270's family member. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for neglect by not having their incidents investigated. The findings were: 1- Resident #370 Review of Resident #370's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #370 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes (high blood glucose), cancer ( abnormal increase in number of cells), end stage renal disease, and dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #370) of 4 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #370 keeping food in her room in unsanitary conditions. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs. Findings include: Review of Resident #370's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #370 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes (high blood glucose), cancer ( abnormal proliferation of cells), end stage renal disease (complete loss of kidney function), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #59) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #59 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #59's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #59 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #59's BIMS score of 99 indicated Resident #59 was unable to complete the interview. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #59 required maximal assistance with toileting and personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #59's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #59) of two residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility failed to ensure CNA A provided appropriate perineal (genital and rectal areas) care for Resident #59 after an incontinent episode when she failed to clean from front to back. This failure could place residents at risk for the development and/or worsening of urinary tract infections and skin breakdown. Findings included: Record review of Resident #59's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #59 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #59's BIMS score of 99 indicated Resident #59 was unable to complete the interview. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #59 required maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Med Aide Cart hall 200) of 3 carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure MA C, responsible for Med Aide cart hall 200, removed medications in unsecure containers from the Med Aide Cart. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the medication available due to possible drug diversion and at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medication. Findings Included: Record review and observation on 04/17/24 at 12:00 PM of Med Aide Cart Hall 200, with MA C revealed the blister pack for Resident #61's Hydroco/APAP 7.5 - 325 mg tablet (controlled medication used for pain) had 1 blister seal broken and the pill still inside the broken blister and taped over. Interview on 04/17/24 at 12:05 PM, MA C stated she was unaware when the blister pack seal was broken,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 resident (Resident #59 and Resident #46) of 8 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure: 1- CNA A performed hand hygiene and changed gloves during incontinent care for Resident #59. 2- LVN B performed hand hygiene after performing FSBS (finger stick blood sugar) checks on Resident #46 and cleaning the glucometer, before re-entering the medication cart and drawing the Resident's Insulin. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination of pathogens and illness. Findings include: 1- Record review of Resident #59's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #59 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #59's BIMS score of 99…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for two of thirteen residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's room had a toilet that flushed and repaired walls. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident#2's room had a closet door that was functional and repaired flooring. These failures could place residents at risk for living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environments. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), and high blood pressure. Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for facility's one dumpster and used grease disposal container for garbage disposal, in that: 1. Facility failed to ensure used grease disposal container was disposed of by contract company. 2. Facility failed to ensure dumpster did not have items of recliner, wheelchairs, mattress and used PPE gloves on the ground behind dumpster. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for exposure to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents. Findings included: Observations on 02/28/23 at 9:50 AM and 03/01/23 at 12:54 PM revealed grease disposal trash container to the side of the facility's dumpster revealed it was closed but full to the top with pieces of fries on top. Observation on 02/28/23 at 9:50 AM of behind exterior dumpster revealed a recliner, four wheelchairs and mattress behind it with used gloves and trash debris on ground. There was a sticky substance on ground behind dumpster. Dumpster was open. Observation on 03/01/23 at 12:57 PM of behind exterior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two (Residents #64, and #65,) of ten residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure staff provided consistent showers/baths and shaving to Residents #64 and #65 This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed hygiene care which could cause skin breakdown, a loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #64's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 0/27/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a BIMS score of 14 which indicated he was cognitively intact. His active diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). He was totally dependent for bathing and required extensive two-person assistance of personal hygiene, dressing, toilet use and transfers. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards in one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. Facility failed to ensure fryer was cleaned after use and grease was changed. 2. Dietary [NAME] Z failed to wash hands during lunch meal preparation on 02/28/23. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: 1. Observation in facility's kitchen on 02/28/23 at 9:43 AM revealed grease in fryer was dark brown with couple fries floating on top of grease with food particles and crumbs on fryer. Interview on 02/28/23 at 9:45 AM revealed Dietary Manager stated the fryer was last used for dinner yesterday evening. She stated she expected the fryer should have been cleaned off after use. Dietary Manager stated the grease in the fryer had not been changed due to grease container was full. She stated the company had not come out to dispose of the used grease in 4 months. She stated she had called them several times.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #31) of five residents observed for infection control. CNA B and NA C failed to perform hand hygiene during incontinent care for Resident #31 and CNA B failed to perform hand hygiene before leaving Resident #31's room. Theses failure could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination. Findings included: Review of Resident #31's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 04/29/16. Resident #31 was severely cognitively impaired and unable to complete the interview for mental status. She was totally dependent of one-to-two-person assistance with all ADLs and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Her diagnoses included aphasia (disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two (Residents #31 and Resident # 52) of eighteen residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #31's contractures to her right and left shoulders with interventions required to prevent further decline. 2. The facility failed to care plan Resident #52's contractures to his right hand with interventions required to prevent further decline. These failures could place residents at risk for possible adverse side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life and care and worsening of contractures. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #31's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 04/29/16. Resident #31 was severely cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for one (Resident #31) of two residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility failed to ensure NA C provided appropriate perineal care for Resident #31 after an incontinent episode when she failed to separate the residents' labia and clean down the middle. This failure placed residents at risk for the development and/or worsening of urinary tract infections and skin breakdown. Findings include: Review of Resident #31's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 04/29/16. Resident #31 was severely cognitively impaired and unable to complete the interview for mental status. She was totally dependent of one-to-two-person assistance with all ADLs and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain from hospice the hospice plan of care, hospice election form and the physician certification of the terminal illness for two (Resident #21 and #4) of two residents reviewed for hospice records. 1.The facility failed to obtain the hospice election form and a physician certification of terminal illness for Resident #21. 2.The facility failed to obtain the hospice a physician certification of terminal illness for Resident #4. These failures could place residents at risk for services and treatments not being coordinated. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #21's electronic face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #21 had diagnoses which included Rhabdomyolysis, pain, psychosis, cirrhosis of liver. Record review of Resident #21's March 2023 electronic physician's orders reflected on 10/25/22 she was admitted to hospice. Record review of Resident #21's electronic clinical record and hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir at MemorialDenison, TX 1 of 5Bennettsville Health And Rehabilitation CenterBennettsville, SC 1 of 5Calhoun Convalescent CenterSaint Matthews, SC 1 of 5Forest Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation CtrCatonsville, MD 1 of 5Julia Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Lake Emory Post Acute CareInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenwoodGreenwood, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - InmanInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - Rock HillRock Hill, SC 1 of 5Northampton Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenteFrederick, MD 1 of 5Oakbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterSummerville, SC 1 of 5Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOakland, MD 1 of 5Physical Rehabilitation And Wellness Center Of SpaSpartanburg, SC 1 of 5Riverside Health and RehabCharleston, SC 1 of 5San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care CenterRound Rock, TX 1 of 5Springdale Healthcare CenterCamden, SC 2 of 5Berlin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBerlin, MD 2 of 5Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBremond, TX 2 of 5Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCrownsville, MD 2 of 5Faith Healthcare CenterFlorence, SC 2 of 5Falcon Ridge RehabilitationHutto, TX 2 of 5Hillside Heights Rehabilitation SuitesAmarillo, TX 2 of 5Horizon Health And Rehabilitation CenterLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Lancaster Health and RehabilitationLancaster, SC 2 of 5Las Ventanas De SocorroSocorro, TX 2 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenvilleGreenville, SC 2 of 5Midlands Health & Rehabilitation CenterColumbia, SC 2 of 5Mira Vista CourtFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Moran Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWesternport, MD 2 of 5North Las Vegas Care CenterNorth las Vegas, NV 2 of 5Pavilion at Glacier ValleySlinger, WI 2 of 5Sandy Lake Rehabilitation And Care CenterCoppell, TX 2 of 5Southpointe Healthcare and RehabilitationGreenville, SC 2 of 5Spanish Hills Wellness SuitesLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Terra Bella Health and Wellness SuitesHouston, TX 2 of 5The Pavilion At CreekwoodMansfield, TX 2 of 5Villa Rosa Nursing And Rehabilitation, LLCMitchellville, MD 3 of 5Bridgecrest Rehabilitation SuitesHouston, TX 3 of 5Crimson Heights Health & WellnessHumble, TX 3 of 5Devlin Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCumberland, MD

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2017
CERISE, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/24/2014
CASTANEDA, EDMUNDOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/2022
CORINTH HEALTH CARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2017
WEAVER, SHERRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
FORMAN, MURRAYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/25/2025
FUNDAMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
FUNDAMENTAL CLINICAL AND OPERATIONAL SERVICES, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
MUNUKUTI, PADMAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 7%Other / private 32%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$306per resident / day
operating cost
$9,305per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$273per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676319. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next