No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Spanish Hills Wellness Suites

5351 Montessouri Street, Las Vegas, NV 89113 · For profit - Individual · 144 certified beds · (702) 251-2200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (702) 251-2200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Mar 2025
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6970 W Patrick Ln · (702) 450-1717 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5915 S Rainbow Blvd · (702) 220-9865 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6015 S Rainbow Blvd · (702) 665-5397 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Sean's Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.7%12.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.6%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%5.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%2.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.1%13.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.1%22.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%89.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.2%15.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.6%17.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.2%80.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.4%23.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.2%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.361.851.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.981.451.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.2%CMS range 30.9–53.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 9.2–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting55.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge80.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.7%CMS range 5.7–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.431.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.66
RN hoursweekends
31.0%
Total nursing turnover
29.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 132.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-27)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility failed to ensure the hand sink in the kitchen food preparation area dispensed hot water; kitchen equipment was free of greasy buildup and food debris; floors were maintained free of heavy food debris and spillage; the ventilation hood filter was free of visible dust and grease buildup; and food items were properly stored in the freezer.The deficient practices had the potential to compromise food safety, increase the risk of foodborne illness, and create conditions conducive to pest infestation and physical hazards, placing residents, staff, and visitors at risk.Findings include:On 02/24/2026 at approximately 8:30 AM, during the initial kitchen tour following concerns were observed:-In the food preparation area, a designated handwashing sink did not dispense hot water due to a malfunctioning hot water handle, preventing appropriate handwashing and sanitation practices. -Heavy grease build-up and food debris were present on the sides of the fryer. -The ventilation hood filter located on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the discharge notice was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for 1 of 42 sampled residents (Resident 150). This failure had the potential to lead to resident rights not being advocated for improper discharges.Findings include:Resident 150 (R150) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified diastolic congestive heart failure, chest pain, and atrial fibrillation. R150 was discharged on 01/08/2026.R150's medical record lacked documented evidence of notification to the State LTC Ombudsman.On 02/26/2026 at 2:37 PM, the Director of Case Management explained the process for reporting to the LTC Ombudsman was to generate a list of discharged residents at the end of each month and send it by facsimile to the LTC Ombudsman. The Director of Case Management reviewed R150's medical record and confirmed the LTC Ombudsman was notified regarding the discharge. The Director of Case Management…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for the care of extensive skin dryness in the lower extremities for 1 of 42 sampled residents (Resident 119). This deficient practice had the potential to worsen skin dryness and compromise skin integrity.Findings include:Resident 119 (R119) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bilateral lower extremity pain, onychomycosis, cellulitis of the right big toe, and morbid obesity.On 02/24/2026 at 11:00 AM, an observation revealed extensive flaky skin dryness with visible scaling of R119's bilateral lower extremities.A physician order dated 01/12/2020, documented instructions to apply antifungal cream to the bilateral lower extremities daily and as needed for dryness.The medical record lacked documented evidence a care plan was developed and implemented to address the resident's dry skin condition.On 02/27/2026 at 10:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) prescribed splints were applied as ordered for 1 of 42 residents (Resident 17), and 2) a staff member did not document an antifungal ointment as administered when it was not available in the medication cart and not applied to the resident for 1 of 42 sampled residents (Resident 119). This deficient practice had the potential to result in worsening contractures due to the lack of consistent joint positioning, and to result in untreated skin dryness, worsening skin breakdown, and missed medication doses.Findings include:Resident 17 (R17) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident with left side weakness, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension.A physician order dated 12/02/2025 documented the use of splints as follows: a waffle boot to the left lower extremity and a carrot orthosis to the left hand for 6 hours or as tolerated.A physical therapy evaluation dated 07/23/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure dietary orders were followed for a resident receiving a chopped diet for 1 of 42 sampled residents (Resident 16). The deficient practice created potential for choking, aspiration and/or compromised nutritional status of the resident.Findings include:Resident 16 (R16) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, anorexia, morbid obesity, history of stroke, dysphagia, and altered mental status.A physician diet order dated 01/23/2026 documented no added salt, consistency chopped.On 02/25/2026 at 12:50 PM, R16 was lying in bed with head of bed elevated eating lunch. R16's meal ticket documented no added salt-chopped and included the following items: -Three chicken tenders with one portion of dipping sauce-One half cup mashed potatoes with 2 ounces of gravy-One half cup chopped steamed cabbage-One serving of chopped lemon meringue pieR16's meal tray consisted of a chicken patty on bun cut into four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were discarded from two resident refrigerators. The deficient practice had the potential for expired foods to be consumed, which could lead to foodborne illness. Findings include:On 02/24/2026 at 11:26 AM, the refrigerator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] contained:- one unopened container of yogurt, expired 12/18/2025- two unopened bottles of Starbucks Vanilla Frappuccino, expired 12/15/2025- two slices of blueberry pie, each in a clamshell container not datedOn 02/24/2026 at 11:36 AM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1), confirmed the findings in the refrigerator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA1 explained CNA staff were responsible for cleaning the refrigerators and removing expired food items as part of daily duties when cleaning resident rooms. CNA1 stated expired items should have been discarded to prevent residents from consuming and getting sick.On 02/24/2026 at 11:56 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain proper waste management practices by allowing 3 of 3 outdoor waste dumpsters to remain uncovered. This deficient practice had the potential to attract pests and create unsanitary conditions in the waste handling area.Findings include:On 02/24/2026 at 8:40 AM, three outdoor garbage dumpsters were observed uncovered and overfilled, creating conditions that could attract pests and result in unsanitary waste handling practices.On 02/24/2026 at 9:30 AM, the Maintenance Director confirmed the observation and stated the garbage service company picked up waste weekly. The Maintenance Director acknowledged the dumpsters should have been kept covered at all times to prevent pest activity and odors.The facility's policy titled Waste Disposal, dated 10/16/2025, documented that waste would be disposed of in a manner that prevents transmission of disease, nuisances, or breeding areas for insects and feeding areas for animals such as rodents. The policy further indicated staff should ensure waste containers and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a report submitted to the state agency (SA) regarding an allegation of sexual abuse was thoroughly completed for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 2). The deficient practice had the potential to compromise the safety of residents. Findings include: Resident 2 (R2) R2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including closed fracture of the right femur, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, and an anxiety disorder. An initial report of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the SA on 01/22/2025, revealed R2 alleged being touched inappropriately by a staff member described as a white male wearing a ponytail. A final report of the FRI submitted to the SA on 01/28/2025, revealed the facility was not able to substantiate R2's allegation of sexual abuse due to the description of the alleged male R2 provided did not match any of the staff members in the facility. On 03/06/2025 at 1:50 PM, a Restorative Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dented cans and expired food products were discarded, and the kitchen floor and essential cooking equipment were cleaned and maintained in sanitary conditions. The deficient practice had the potential to expose residents to foodborne illnesses. Findings include: On 01/07/2025 at 8:00 AM, an inspection was conducted in the kitchen with the Kitchen Manager. The following concerns were identified: - The fryer exhibited the oil visibly aged and contaminated. Food debris was prevalent, further contributing to the unsanitary condition. The fryer's surfaces were coated with a layer of grease and food debris. - The floor under the stove and oven was found to be greasy, dusty, and littered with food debris. - The lateral surfaces of the stove were greasy. - The toaster was greasy, with its exterior covered in grease and visibly soiled with food debris. - A mixer was visibly soiled with food remains. - A breadcrumbs container with expiration date 11/01/2024. - Three cartoons of thickened apple juice 1.36…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a working over the bed light for 1 of 24 residents (Resident 125). The failed practice had the potential to deprive the resident of using a urinal bottle independently overnight. Findings include: Resident 125 (R125) R125 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, and cerebrovascular disease. On 01/07/2025 at 10:07 AM, R125 was observed in bed with a urinal bottle hung on the bedside nightstand. R125 reported had moved into the room two weeks prior and was not provided a remote control for the over the bed light. R125 was informed the remote control was sent out for repair. R125 explained was able to use the urinal bottle independently, however, had not been able to use the urinal bottle at night due to not being able to see in the dark. R125 explained needed the light on to position the urinal bottle correctly. R125 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary homelike environment by ensuring proper floor cleaning procedures were performed in 16 of 90 residents' rooms (rooms 406 to 422). The deficient practice had the potential to increase infection risk and denied the residents the right to a safe and clean homelike environment. Findings include: 1) Residents' room cleanness: On 01/07/2025 at 9:30 AM, Resident #28 (R28) verbalized concerns related to the cleanness of the resident's room. R28 indicated the room had been cleaned on a daily basis but dust and debris remained on the edges between the wall and the floor at the baseboard. On 01/07/2025 at 10:00 AM, a housekeeping staff confirmed room [ROOM NUMBER] had been cleaned. The housekeeping staff acknowledged the edges between the wall and the floor at the baseboard were not cleaned. On 01/07/2025 at 10:12 AM, the housekeeping supervisor confirmed the observation and verbalized all the surfaces of the room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level two referral was completed for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 69). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive the residents of concern and other residents of necessary behavioral health services. Findings include: Resident 69 (R69) R69 was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. On 01/07/2025 in the afternoon, R69 stated was on the Resident Council and had been at the facility for about three years. The resident related had been in a bad accident, had post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from it, and also has bipolar illness. A PASARR level one document dated 08/06/2021, revealed R69 did not have dementia, mental illness (MI), intellectual disability, (ID) mental retardation (MR) or any related condition (RC) and was deemed appropriate for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was formulated to manage the resident's care with a nephrostomy tube for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 98). This deficient practice could have led to an increased risk of complications related to improper management and a lack of continuity in care. Findings include: Resident 98 (R98) R98 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including palliative care, dysuria (painful or difficult urination), and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. On 01/07/2025 at 12:48 PM, R98 verbalized a complaint to a Registered Nurse (RN) about a peeling dressing. An RN checked the resident's back and confirmed the nephrostomy dressing had peeled off, appeared old and undated, and was soiled. R98 indicated a shower had caused the dressing to become wet, but it had not been changed. Complaints of itchiness on the surrounding skin were noted. The RN acknowledged R98 was receiving hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews and document review, the facility failed to: 1) implement a care plan for restorative hand splinting services to prevent contractures for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 44), and 2) develop care plans for side rails, weight loss and pressure ulcer for 3 of 24 sampled residents (Residents 62, 87, and 129). The deficient practice placed the residents at risk for worsening health conditions related to contractures, injuries, malnutrition and pressure ulcers. Findings include: The facility policy titled Care Plan Process, Person-Centered Care dated 05/30/2023, documented the facility would develop and implement baseline and comprehensive care plan for each resident that include instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. 1) Implementation of a Care Plan: Resident 44 (R44) R44 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with weakness right side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests of the residents for 2 of 24 sampled residents (Residents 26 and 117) and 7 unsampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential risk to cause psychosocial distress to the residents. Findings include: Resident #26 (R26) R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including erythematous condition (unspecified), anxiety disorder (unspecified), and secondary hyperparathyroidism of renal origin. On 01/07/2025 in the morning, R26 explained had been at the facility for about 6 years and liked to come to activities and do single solitary activities like reading newspapers and magazines. R26 explained R26 would like to see more trips out of the facility to events and shopping places. R26 had an Activity Evaluation dated 04/09/2024 which documented the resident had identified needs where programming should be focused on community…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an expired medication was not administered to 1 of 7 unsampled residents (Unsampled Resident 02). The deficient practice had a potential for a non-viable medication to be administered to the resident. Findings include: Unsampled Resident 02 (UR2) UR2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of other sequelae of cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder (unspecified), chronic kidney disease stage 3 (unspecified), and dementia with mood disturbance (unspecified). On [DATE] at 09:45 AM, a punch card of Hydralazine HCL 10 milligram (mg) tablets for UR2 was observed expired on [DATE], in the 400-hall medication cart. On [DATE] at 09:46 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse, confirmed the Hydralazine HCL 10mg tablets were expired and should have been discarded for resident safety. On [DATE] at 09:47 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing, also verified the Hydralazine HCL 10mg tablets were expired and should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to place hand splint for contracture management for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 44). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk to develop contractures, decrease hand functionality, and cause pain and discomfort. Findings include: Resident 44 (R44) R44 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with weakness right side of the body. On 01/07/2025 in the morning, R44 was lying on the bed clutching the right hand with the left hand. The resident indicated they could not move the right hand, and a splint was previously used but was not sure why the splint was no longer applied. A care plan developed on 04/20/2023 and updated on 12/18/2024, documented R44 should have received restorative nursing program (RNP) (a set of nursing interventions that help residents maintain or improve their ability to function independently) for right resting hand splint due to the increased risk to acquire a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order had been obtained for the presence of the nephrostomy tube, the insertion site had been monitored, and dressing changes had been scheduled for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 98). This deficient practice increased the risk of infection, complications from improper management, and a lack of continuity in care. Findings include: Resident 98 (R98) R98 was admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including palliative care, dysuria (painful or difficult urination) and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. On 01/07/2025 at 12:48 PM, R98 voiced a complaint to a Registered Nurse (RN) about a peeling dressing. The RN checked the resident's back and confirmed placement of a capped nephrostomy tube, with the nephrostomy dressing soiled, peeled off, and appearing old and undated. R98 indicated a shower had caused the dressing to become wet, but it had not been changed. The RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to assess a resident's nutritional status during a period of substantial weight loss for 1 of 24 residents (Resident 87). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk of malnutrition and dehydration, compromising the residents' health and increasing susceptibility to further medical complications. Findings include: Resident 87 (R87) R87 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including encephalopathy, nausea with vomiting, and drug induced subacute dyskinesia. A Malnutrition Screening Tool dated 09/09/2024, documented R87 was eating poorly due to decreased appetite. R87 scored positive for nutritional risk. R87's Vitals Report dated 09/07/2024, documented an initial resident weight of 150 pounds (lbs.) upon admission. The Vitals Report documented resident weight of 120.1 lbs. on 10/09/2024. R87 sustained weight loss of 29.99 lbs. or 19.93% of R87's total body weight between 09/07/2024 and 10/09/2024.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Dialysis Communication Record were completed, shunt or dialysis access assessments were conducted, and vital signs were obtained pre- and post-dialysis for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 16). The deficient practice increased the risk of complications, including delayed detection of shunt malfunction, inadequate dialysis, hemodynamic instability, bleeding, and potential infection. Findings include: Resident 16 (R16) R16 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and dependence on renal dialysis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented the brief interview of mental status with a score of 14/15, which indicated R16's cognitive status was intact and R16 was receiving dialysis treatment. A Physician Order dated 08/28/2024, documented dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. A Care Plan dated 09/06/2024, and revised 12/05/2024, documented R16 was on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for the use of bed side rails for 1 of 24 residents (Resident 62). The failed practice had the potential to place the resident at risk of injury such as falls, entrapment, and broken bones. Findings include: Resident 62 (R62) R62 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, chest pain, and syncope and collapse. On 01/07/2025 at 3:27 PM, R62 was observed sitting in a wheelchair at the resident's bedside. Bed side rails were observed up on bilateral sides of the bed. R62 reported side rails were put up to facilitate movement. A Side Rail Review and Consent dated 12/06/2024, documented the use of side rails was considered for syncope, status post fall, hypertension, and hypothyroidism to aid with repositioning, bed mobility and transfers. R62's medical record lacked documented evidence of a physician order for the use of side rails. On 01/10/2025 at 8:37…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an expired punch card of medications was discarded. The deficient practice had a potential for a non-viable medication to be administered to the resident. Findings include: On [DATE] at 09:45 AM, a punch card of Hydralazine HCL 10 milligram (mg) tablets was observed expired on [DATE], in the 400-hall medication cart. On [DATE] at 09:46 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse, confirmed the Hydralazine HCL 10mg tablets was expired and should have been discarded for resident safety. On [DATE] at 09:47 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing, also verified the Hydralazine HCL 10mg tablets was expired and should have been discarded for resident safety. A facility policy titled Medication Storage: 8.2 General Guidelines for Storage of Medication and Biologicals revised [DATE], documented outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. hand hygiene was performed for 1 of 24 residents (Resident 16) and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented for 2 of 24 residents (Residents 16 and 98) and 2. hand sanitizer was available in the resident care areas. These deficient practices could have led to potential cross-contamination and transmission of infectious diseases among residents and staff. Findings include: A facility policy titled Transmission-Based/Standard Precautions and Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 05/15/2023, documented the expansion of EBP to include the use of PPE, such as gowns and gloves, during high-contact resident care activities where opportunities for the transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing existed. EBP was required for all residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices, including urinary catheters. EBP was also required during high-contact resident care activities, such as dressing, transferring,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to establish and implement a baseline care plan for the care and management of an Aspen collar (neck support device to manage spinal fractures while healing) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice had the potential to result in skin impairments for resident. Findings include: Resident 3 (R3) R3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple fracture of ribs, left side; unspecified displaced fracture of second cervical vertebra; person injured in unspecified motor vehicle accident, nontraffic. The last treatment encounter for physical therapy dated 12/13/2023, documented a precaution/contraindications of cervical vertebra 2 fracture Aspen collar at all times for R3. An admission progress note dated 12/07/2023 documented R3 had a neck collar in place. There was no physician order documented for R3 to be wearing the neck (Aspen) collar. The picture of the resident (R3) on the facility face sheet showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a cervical (Aspen) collar was ordered as recommended for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice had a potential for resident to heal incorrectly after a cervical fracture. Findings include: Resident 3 (R3) R3 had an admission date of 12/06/2023, with diagnoses including multiple fractures of ribs, left side; unspecified displaced fracture of second cervical vertebra; person injured in unspecified motor-vehicle accident. On 08/15/2024 at 9:30 AM, the facility face sheet picture for R3 showed the resident wearing a cervical (Aspen) collar in the picture. The neck (Aspen) collar is a neck motion limiting device used to manage spinal fractures by maintaining the neck in a proper position while healing. R3's Discharge Summary from the acute care facility, documented spine surgery was consulted who recommended non-operative management with Aspen collar on at all times for 8-10 weeks. There was no physician order documented for R3 to be wearing the neck (Aspen) collar. The medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) clean and sanitary kitchen floors, walls, kitchen equipment, and ice machine in 1 of 2 nourishment rooms, and 2) temperatures were within appropriate range for a food item and reach-in freezer in 1 of 2 nourishment rooms. The deficient practice had the potential to compromise food safety, lead to cross contamination of harmful substances to food, or cause foodborne illnesses to resident. Findings include: On 01/09/2024 at 7:39 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Director revealed the following: 1) Areas observed with food crumbs, dust, debris, and/or soiled with grease included: -floor area under deep fryer. -internal components of stove range. -floor area under and the wall behind preparation tables which were leaned against the wall. -wall area behind the dishwasher. -separate serving kitchen area had food debris and white water-stained buildup on the floors, counter, and inside cabinets. -ice machine in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the staff provided privacy and dignity to the residents by knocking on the door and introducing themselves prior to entering the residents' rooms for 3 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 91, 86, and 44) and 6 unsampled residents (Resident 54, 56, 76, 31, 62, and 289). The deficient practice had the potential for the residents' rights to be violated. Findings include: On 01/09/2024 at 2:02 PM, Resident 91 (R91) voiced concerns related to individuals entering the resident's room without announcing and introducing themselves. R91 explained not knowing if the person who was entering the room was a staff member or a resident. On 01/10/2024 at 11:52 AM, a Resident Council Meeting was conducted with nine alert and oriented residents in attendance. The following residents revealed the staff were not knocking on the door and introducing themselves before entering the residents' rooms. The residents stated how they felt if staff did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure there was a process in place to identify and refer residents for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) level two for 3 of 24 residents (Residents 20, 80, and 85) with psychiatric diagnosis. The deficient practice had the potential to deprive residents of necessary behavioral health services. Findings include: The facility policy titled PASARR Documentation Policy, last revised 06/09/20023, documented any resident with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition must be referred, by the facility to the appropriate state-designated mental health or intellectual disability authority for review. Resident 20 (R20) R20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including mood disorder due to known physiological condition with mixed features and depression. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented active diagnosis including depression with no additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to establish and implement a baseline care plan for the care and management of an ostomy (surgical opening) site for 2 of 24 residents (Resident 49 and Resident 232). The deficient practice had the potential to result in poor outcomes for residents. Findings include: Resident 49 (R49) R49 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites with fat layer exposed, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. A discharge assessment dated [DATE] documented acknowledgment of colostomy site. An admission assessment dated [DATE] documented R49 had colostomy. The medical record lacked documented evidence of a care plan for colostomy. A physician order dated 01/06/2024 documented to perform colostomy care every shift. The medical record lacked documented evidence of any further care orders or wound orders for care of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure care and management of a resident's ileostomy device was included in the resident's comprehensive care plan for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 232). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for complications related to the ileostomy device. Findings include: Resident 232 (R232) R232 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diverticulitis of large intestines with perforation and abscess and surgical aftercare following surgery of the digestive system. On 01/09/2024 at 9:43 AM, R232 laid in bed, awake and alert, wearing a gown which was pulled up and revealed an ostomy pouch secured around a stoma (an opening in the abdominal wall) with undated dressing. R232 clarified the pouch was an ileostomy device which was placed by the surgeon on 12/11/2023. The resident indicated Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) emptied the bag upon the resident's request or when filled with stool and gas. R232 could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided as scheduled for a resident who required assistance with showers for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 234). The deficient practice resulted in the resident expressing feelings of discomfort and embarrassment. Findings include: Resident 234 (R234) R234 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side. On 01/09/2024 at 10:59 AM, R234 was seated in wheelchair with contracted left arm. R234 indicated not being provided a shower for at least two weeks and was feeling uncomfortable and gross. The resident explained shower days were scheduled every Monday and Thursday by the day shift, but these were not being provided or re-offered. R234 indicated staff would wipe other body parts after incontinent care such as the back and front side but R234 verbalized bed baths were not thorough and were not sufficient substitution for a shower. On 01/09/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 44). The deficient practice had the potential to have ineffective results with medication administration. Findings include: Resident 44 (R44) R44 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including hypertension (high blood pressure). A physician order documented to give Isosorbide Dinitrate 20 milligrams 2 tablets every 12 hours. On 01/11/2024 at 8:12 AM, during medication administration observation, the Registered Nurse (RN) was observed dispensing one tablet of Isosorbide Dinitrate to medication cup and placing medication pack back in medication cart. On 01/12/2024 at 12:51 PM, the registered nurse indicated it was important to double check resident information and drug information including dosage and route to ensure correct medications were given correctly. The RN indicated the wrong dosage would have been given if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure skin checks and skin assessments were completed and the rashes, redness, bruising, and open area on the resident's leg were reported and treated in a timely manner for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 61). The deficient practice had the potential for the worsening of the resident's skin condition. Findings include: Resident 61 (R61) R61 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pruritus, long term (current) use of anticoagulants, and repeated falls. The physician's order dated 05/01/2023, documented weekly skin check by licensed nurse once a day on Monday. The Point of Care History record for August 2023, documented the following electronic charting by certified nursing assistants (CNAs) of R61's skin problem/condition and its location: - 08/15/2023 at 3:03 AM, clear/no skin problem - 08/16/2023 at 5:24 AM, redness and bruising on leg - 08/17/2023 at 12:30 AM, open area on leg - 08/18/2023 at 11:23 PM, rashes on leg -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure physician orders for care and management of a 1) colostomy and 2) ileostomy were obtained for 2 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 49 and Resident 232). The deficient practice had the potential for inappropriate care and negative outcomes of ostomy sites. Resident 49 (R49) R49 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin of other sites with fat layer exposed, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. A discharge assessment dated [DATE] documented acknowledgment of colostomy site. An admission assessment dated [DATE] documented R49 had colostomy. The medical record lacked documented evidence of a care plan for colostomy. The medical record lacked documented evidence of any care orders or wound orders for care of ostomy site, or appliance change for colostomy as well as frequency of change. On 01/12/24 at 9:31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician order for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to cause harm and delay resident treatment outcomes. Findings Include: Resident 1 (R1) R1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 05/15/2023, with diagnoses including cellulitis of right lower limb, acquired absence of right leg below knee, urinary tract infection, status post kidney transplant, and prolonged antibiotic use. Review of the medical record documented a physician order dated 05/01/2023 for CellCept, administer one tablet twice a day for anti-transplant rejection of kidney. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) documented CellCept was not administered due to item unavailability on the following dates: -05/11/2023 at 9:00 AM -05/12/2023 at 9:00 AM On 08/24/2023 at 4:35 PM, The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the medication was not administered per physician order on 05/11/2023 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a medication cart was locked and 2) A normal saline flush was not left on top of a medication cart. The deficient practice had the potential for residents and visitors to gain unauthorized access to medications and treatment items. Findings include: On 08/24/2023 at 11:30 AM, a medication cart in the 100 hall was unlocked and unattended in the hallway outside a resident room. A 10 milliliter (ml) normal saline flush was on top of the medication cart. Visitors and residents were observed walking past the unattended medication cart. On 08/24/2023 at 11:34 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) responsible for the medication cart indicated the cart should be locked. The LPN confirmed the 10 ml saline flush should not be left on top of the cart and should be locked up. The LPN reported medications are locked to prevent residents and visitors from obtaining medications. On 08/24/2023 at 2:07 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the expectation for all medication carts to be locked when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir at MemorialDenison, TX 1 of 5Bennettsville Health And Rehabilitation CenterBennettsville, SC 1 of 5Calhoun Convalescent CenterSaint Matthews, SC 1 of 5Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the ParkwayCorinth, TX 1 of 5Forest Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation CtrCatonsville, MD 1 of 5Julia Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Lake Emory Post Acute CareInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenwoodGreenwood, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - InmanInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - Rock HillRock Hill, SC 1 of 5Northampton Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenteFrederick, MD 1 of 5Oakbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterSummerville, SC 1 of 5Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOakland, MD 1 of 5Physical Rehabilitation And Wellness Center Of SpaSpartanburg, SC 1 of 5Riverside Health and RehabCharleston, SC 1 of 5San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care CenterRound Rock, TX 1 of 5Springdale Healthcare CenterCamden, SC 2 of 5Berlin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBerlin, MD 2 of 5Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBremond, TX 2 of 5Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCrownsville, MD 2 of 5Faith Healthcare CenterFlorence, SC 2 of 5Falcon Ridge RehabilitationHutto, TX 2 of 5Hillside Heights Rehabilitation SuitesAmarillo, TX 2 of 5Horizon Health And Rehabilitation CenterLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Lancaster Health and RehabilitationLancaster, SC 2 of 5Las Ventanas De SocorroSocorro, TX 2 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenvilleGreenville, SC 2 of 5Midlands Health & Rehabilitation CenterColumbia, SC 2 of 5Mira Vista CourtFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Moran Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWesternport, MD 2 of 5North Las Vegas Care CenterNorth las Vegas, NV 2 of 5Pavilion at Glacier ValleySlinger, WI 2 of 5Sandy Lake Rehabilitation And Care CenterCoppell, TX 2 of 5Southpointe Healthcare and RehabilitationGreenville, SC 2 of 5Terra Bella Health and Wellness SuitesHouston, TX 2 of 5The Pavilion At CreekwoodMansfield, TX 2 of 5Villa Rosa Nursing And Rehabilitation, LLCMitchellville, MD 3 of 5Bridgecrest Rehabilitation SuitesHouston, TX 3 of 5Crimson Heights Health & WellnessHumble, TX 3 of 5Devlin Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCumberland, MD

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THI OF NEVADA LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/26/2013
LEINWEBER, MICHAELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/13/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$960K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 5%Other / private 19%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $960K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$403per resident / day
operating cost
$12,266per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$385per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nevada
$11,786/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,463/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,241/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295094. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next