Riverside Health and Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 154.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.72 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.52 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.83 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews and review of the facility policy, the facility neglected to identify and acknowledge that Resident (R)3 was missing from the facility. The facility further failed to implement emergency protocol in a timely manner in order to locate the missing resident. On 11/18/24 at 3:15 PM, the Administrator was notified that the facility neglected to acknowledge a resident was missing from the facility and implement emergency protocol timely for locating the missing resident, which constituted IJ at F600. On 11/18/24 at 3:15 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS IJ Templates, informing the facility IJ existed as of 11/04/24. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.12 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. On 11/19/24 the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan for F600. On 11/19/24, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and determined the facility put forth due diligence in addressing the noncompliance. The IJ is considered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident (R)3, who successfully eloped from the facility. On 11/18/24 at 3:15 PM, the Administrator was notified that the failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689. On 11/18/24 at 3:15 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS IJ Templates, informing the facility IJ existed as of 11/04/24. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Quality of Care. On 11/19/24 the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan for F689. On 11/19/24, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and determined the facility put forth due diligence in addressing the noncompliance. The IJ is considered at Past Non-Compliance as of 11/07/24. An Extended Survey was conducted in conjunction with the Complaint Survey for non-compliance at F689, constituting substandard quality of care. Findings Include: Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to conduct smoking assessments for 4 out of 10 residents (Resident (R)84, R116, R133, and R75) who smoke. Additionally, the facility failed to provide proper safety protocols for 10 out of 10 residents (R80, R84, R116, R595, R60, R133, R75, R93, R37, and R103) who smoke. On 03/13/24 at 4:32 PM, the Administrator was notified that the failure to conduct assessments on residents who smoke and failing to provide proper safety protocols for residents who smoke constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689. On 03/13/24 at 4:32 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 03/10/24. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Quality of Care. On 03/13/24, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 03/14/24 the survey team, validated the facility's corrective actions and removed the IJ. The facility remained out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to fully investigate an allegation of staff to resident abuse. Specifically, the facility did not conduct a record review related to the alleged violation to acknowledge that the incident occurred. There were no clinical progress notes, incident reports, or Care Plan updates, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, Resident (R)7. This failure has the potential to result in continued psychosocial harm or place the resident at risk for further abuse. Findings include:Review of the undated facility policy titled, Organizational Ethics, Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property, states, III. Prevention: 5. Ongoing assessment, care planning, and monitoring of those patients/residents with special needs that may lead to abuse or neglect. Component IV: Investigation 5. E. Employees/witnesses will be interviewed by designated facility staff and the interviewer will record all witness accounts in a document, written, dated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policies, observations, and interviews, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning of kitchen equipment (deep fryer, stove and 2 of 2 ovens), failed to ensure that kitchen staff hair was completely covered with a hair net and or/cap, and facial hair was covered with a hair net or beard guard. In addition, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff correctly demonstrated the calibration technique to ensure the temperature readings on the thermometers. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Sanitation & Food Safety in Food and Nutrition Services last revision 10/15/25 revealed, The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) will assume responsibility for the food safety and sanitation of the Nutrition Culinary Department. 1. Infection control and sanitation practices are followed to minimize the risk of contamination of food and prevent food borne illness. (Refer to Exhibit 2E, Major Food Borne Illnesses in section J of this manual. 4.The CDM monitor food safety and sanitation of the Food and Nutrition Department daily.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide or obtain the required specialized rehabilitative services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident (R)42 did not receive rehabilitative services although recommended by the Occupational Therapist. Findings include:Record review of facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living [ADLs], Optimal Function last revision 05/05/23, revealed, The facility provides care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. The Facility provides necessary care to all residents that are unable to carry out activities of daily living on their own to ensure they maintain proper nutrition, grooming, and hygiene. Procedures: 1. Facility staff recognize and assess an inability to preform ADL's or a risk for decline in any ability to perform ADLs by reviewing the most current…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the refrigerator was labeled and dated; failed to ensure dietary equipment was clean; failed to ensure dry storage bins were free of a Styrofoam cup directly touching the flour and sugar instead of a scoop; and failed to ensure dirty dishes and trays were not stored in the dietary prep area. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 128 of 147 residents who received meals prepared in the facility and had the potential to affect the spread of food borne illness. Findings include: A request for a kitchen cleaning and service policy was requested on 04/14/25 at 3:45 PM and on 04/15/25 at 11:30 AM. The policy was not provided prior to the survey exit. During the initial kitchen tour on 04/13/25 at 8:30 AM, with the Dietary [NAME] (DA) the following observations were made: The reach in refrigerator contained food items of gravy, roast beef, a block of opened cheese, and three packages of opened sliced sandwich meat, that were not dated or labeled. The large bins that contained sugar and flour…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement therapy recommendations for the use of hand splints for three of three residents (Resident (R)40, R102, and R15) reviewed for contractures out of a total sample of 34. This failure had the potential to increase limited range of motion, deformities, and pain. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Restorative Nursing Policies and Procedures, revised 10/25/24, revealed, . The Nurse completes the Restorative monthly summary to include overall status in the program, progress toward care plan goals, and program recommendation. Documentation must be completed as per state specific guidelines . documents on all programs during look back of Minimum data set (MDS) . Patients/Residents in a Joint Mobility/Splint Program are reassessed on a regular basis (quarterly), and as needed (significant change). The plan of care is reviewed by the interdisciplinary team and revised as needed. Reassess…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to: 1.) promote the resident's right to dignity for 128 of 147 residents who ate food from the kitchen when meals were served in Styrofoam containers, and 2.) protect the resident's right to physical privacy during medication administration for one of 34 sampled residents (Resident (R)77), reviewed for resident rights. These failures had the potential to affect the dignity and psychosocial wellbeing of the residents. Findings include: A request for a meal service policy was requested on 04/14/25 at 3:45 PM and on 04/15/25 at 11:30 AM. The policy was not provided prior to the survey exit. 1. During an observation of meal service on 04/13/25 at 9:15 AM, residents received their breakfast trays served on Styrofoam containers. During an interview on 03/13/25 at 9:30 AM, the [NAME] stated she arrived at work to find dirty pots, pans, and dishes from the previous evening meal service and did not have enough time to wash…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident's ability to self-administer medications for two of two residents (Resident (R)77 and R108) reviewed for self-administration of medications out of a total sample of 34. This had the potential to cause medication administration errors and adverse consequences. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pharmacy Services Policies and Procedures, revised on 04/17/24, revealed, . The resident may choose to self-administer medication(s) according to applicable state and federal law and regulation upon completion of an assessment by the Interdisciplinary Care Team (lDT). 1. Review of R77's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: congestive heart failure. Review of R77's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose of garbage in a sanitary manner in the kitchen. Specifically, the garbage container was overflowing with garbage on the floor. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 128 of 147 residents who received meals prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 04/13/25 at 8:30 AM, with the dietary cook (DA), the following observation was made: The garbage container near the food preparation area was uncovered and overflowing with garbage of paper towels and gloves on the floor. During an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 04/16/25 at 10:45 AM, she stated that it was unacceptable, and that garbage should be contained or emptied before it overflowed.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff properly handled soiled linen. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 carried unbagged soiled linen out of one of one resident's room (Resident (R) 102) and placed the linen in the soiled linen cart. Failure to properly handle soiled linen can lead to cross contamination. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Laundry, dated 05/2006 revealed, Soiled linens are handled minimally . collection bags, carts or other containers should be strong and large enough to contain the contents of the soiled linens . personnel is instructed in the proper disposition of linens . Review of R102's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab, revealed R102 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but was not limited to: urinary tract infection (UTI) and dysphagia. Review of R102's Physician Orders, located in the EMR under the Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide clean linen/washcloths to residents throughout the facility. Findings include: The facility did not provide a policy on linens/laundry. Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes for the months of September 2023, October 2023, November 2023, December 2023, January 2024, and February 2024, all revealed concerns regarding lack of linens/wash clothes. During an observation on 03/12/24 at 10:31 AM, revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], linens on both residents' beds were stained with food and dirty. During an observation on 03/12/24 at 10:47 AM, revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], linens on resident's bed was stained and dirty. During an observation on 03/12/24 at 10:50 AM, revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], smelled of urine. Linens on the bed were soiled with what appeared to be a yellow liquid, food and dirty. During an observation on 03/12/24 at 11:05 AM, revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], linen on bed B was dirty, stained with food, and dried blood. During an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$27,788 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $5,422 — penalty dated 2024-11-19
• $5,423 — penalty dated 2024-11-19
• $16,943 — penalty dated 2024-03-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC