Magnolia Manor - Greenwood

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 35.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 83.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)1 had adequate supervision to prevent a successful elopement on 04/05/2026.On 04/20/26 at 4:25 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of 04/05/26. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Freedom from Accidents and Hazards.On 04/20/26 the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 04/20/26 the survey team, validated the facility's corrective actions and determined the facility put forth due diligence in addressing the noncompliance. The SA is considering this IJ at Past Noncompliance as of 04/07/26. An extended survey was conducted in conjunction with the Complaint Survey for non-compliance at F689, constituting substandard quality of care.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Elopement with a last revision date of 11/01/17, revealed, To safely and timely redirect…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)1 was adequately supervised to prevent elopement. R1 was noted to have eloped on 12/13/2025. R1 was last seen by facility staff in the facility at approximately 5:30 PM. Facility was made aware that R1 was found outside the facility at 6:06 PM by first responders. According to weather.com, the weather in [NAME], SC on 12/13/25 was a high of 65 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a low of 49F with sunset at 5:19 PM.As a result of Complaint #2697173, on 12/30/2025 at 2:40 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations could cause psychosocial harm.On 12/30/2025 at 3:08 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of 12/13/2025. The IJ was related to F689 Free of Accident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY (2.) Based on review of the facility policy, observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure R131 was free from potential accidents, related to smoking on facility grounds for 1 of 4 residents identified for smoking. R131 being observed smoking unsafely, on the property of a smoke-free facility on 06/13/2025. On 06/13/2025 at 1:31 PM, the SA presented the Administrator with an IJ template related to this incident. On 06/13/2025 at 5:00 PM, the facility presented an acceptable IJ removal plan. Verification of the plan revealed the facility implemented their removal plan as of 06/16/25 at 6:30 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a lower scope/severity level of D. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Smoking Policy, Guidelines with a revision date 11/01/2017 states: Policy:Facility's Leadership will establish and enforce a specific smoking policy for Facility patients/residents, visitors and employees, outlining the parameters, if any, under which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate post-fall interventions were developed and implemented through care plan revision for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls Resident (R)2. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for additional falls and injury.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Process, Person Centered Care with a revision date of 05/05/23 revealed, Policy: The facility will develop and implement a baseline and comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards and quality care. The facility will coordinate the development of the person-centered care plan within the required timeframes. Procedures: 9. Thru ongoing assessment, the facility will initiate person-centered care plans when the resident's clinical status or change of condition dictates the need such as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure foods that were stored in the freezer, refrigerators and dry food storage were appropriately sealed, labeled, dated with a use by date, and/or discarded after the manufacturer's expiration date. This had the potential to affect all residents who received meal trays from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety in Receiving and Storage, with a revision date of 6/20/2023 revealed, Receiving Guidelines 6. Check expiration dates and use by dates to assure dates are within acceptable parameters; General Food Storage Guidelines 3.) .Label both the container and its lid with the common name of the contents, the date, it was transferred to the new container and the discard date; Dry Storage guidelines 2. Tightly seal open packages to prevent contamination or place food in covered container. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dating and Labeling Food Guidelines, updated 2/4/2024, revealed .when opening food in dry storage, make sure food has a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility policy, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an incident that occurred on 03/23/2025. The facility neglected to identify R78 was no longer in the facility, or was her whereabouts known to facility staff. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Mistreatment with a complete revision date of 11/01/2017 stated, The Facility shall report immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not result in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures . Review of R78's Face Sheet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident (R)7 and R78 or their resident representative (RR) of bedholds, including bed reserve payments 2 of 2 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Facility's Policy and State Requirements for Temporary Leave Bed-Hold revised 06/2009 revealed If a resident leaves the facility for temporary hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the resident or his/her representative may ask the Facility to hold the resident's bed until the resident is ready to return (bed hold). The resident and/or his/her representative will be given a copy of the Facility's bed-hold policy before the resident actually leaves for his/her temporary leave or hospitalization. In the case of an emergency hospitalization, the bed hold policy may accompany the resident to the hospital or will be given to the resident or his/her legal representative within twenty-four (24) hours of the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent. The medication administration error rate was 8 percent for 2 out of 25 opportunities observed for error. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Management Program revised 05/05/2023, revealed, Policy: The facility implements a Medication Management program to meet the pharmaceutical needs of patients and residents, according to established standards of practice and regulatory requirements. Security and Safety Guidelines: 16. Medications are dispensed at the time of administration. Pre-pouring or dispensing for a later administration is not permitted. Administering the Medication Pass 7. The authorized staff member prepares one resident's medication at a time. B. Do not touch the medication when opening a bottle or unit dose package C. If a medication which is not in a protective container is dropped, it should be discarded according to policy. 15. If a medication is unavailable,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medication and biologicals, and 4 loose unidentified pills were removed from 2 of 2 medication carts. The facility further failed to remove open and expired items from 1 of 2 treatment carts. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, 8.2 General Guidelines for Storage of Medication and Biologicals, revised [DATE], revealed Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. In accordance with State and Federal laws, the facility will store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperatures and other appropriate environmental controls to preserve their integrity. Procedures: 5. Medications with manufacturer's expiration date expressed in month and year (e.g., May, 2019) will expire on the last day of the month. (unless a sooner expiration date has been placed on the package by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the useof gowns during catheter and wound dressing changes 2 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident (R)35and R57. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transmission Based/Standard Precautions, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions revised on 05/15/23 revealed, Policy: 1. The facility will use transmission-based precautions when the routes of transmission is not completely interrupted using standard precautions alone. These are applied as needed based on the epidemiology of the infecting organism or infectious disease syndrome. There may be some diseases that have multiple routes of transmission which more than one transmission-based precaution may be required. Transmission-based precautions will always be used in addition to standard precautions. 2. Health care workers (HCW) will implement Universal/Standard Precautions whenever there is occupational exposure to blood and body fluids. Procedures: Enhanced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, observation and facility policy review, the facility failed to supervise 1 (Resident (R)6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to supervise R6, who the facility determined was high risk for falls and required staff assistance with showers/bathing, during a shower on 10/06/24. R6 fell from a shower chair when staff left the resident in the shower room unattended and the resident sustained redness to the knees. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Fall Management, revised 05/05/23, indicated, 1. The facility will identify each patient/resident who is at risk for falls and will plan care and implement interventions to manage falls. 2. Qualified staff will complete the Fall Risk Evaluation to determine if patient/resident is a fall risk. 3. The fall management program includes education for staff in creative, functional strategies while recognizing patients/resident's rights and highest practicable level of function.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated to include revised appropriate fall interventions for 3 (Residents (R)1, R2, and R3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Fall Management, revised on 05/05/23, revealed, 6. The care plan reflects individualized interventions that are reassessed and revised as needed. Review of a facility policy titled, Care Plan Process, Person-Centered Care, revised on 05/05/23, revealed, 9. Thru ongoing assessment, the facility will initiate person-centered care plans when the resident's clinical status or change of condition dictates the need such as but not limited to falls and pressure ulcer development. 1. Review of a Resident Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted R1 on 11/03/23, with diagnoses including but not limited to: altered mental status, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle wasting and atrophy, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility policy for fall management and conducted neurological evaluations and post fall nursing documentation for 72 hours for 3 (Residents (R)1, R2, and R3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Fall Management, revised on 05/05/23, revealed, 7. Neurological evaluations will be performed for a resident who sustains an unwitnessed fall, regardless of the resident's cognitive status at the time of the incident. The policy revealed, 9. Post fall nursing documentation for 72 hours, every shift will be completed to monitor the development of late effect or complications of the fall. Review of a facility policy titled, Neurological Checks (Neuro Checks), revised 05/05/23, revealed, The licensed nurse will perform neurological checks following any type of actual or suspected head injury of for changes in level of consciousness. The policy revealed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,075 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-12-30
• $3,962 — penalty dated 2023-12-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $447K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC