No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Northampton Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Cente

200 East 16th Street, Frederick, MD 21701 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 196 certified beds · (301) 662-8700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (301) 662-8700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,562 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,562 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-29)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
304 Delaware Rd · (240) 356-1000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
190 Thomas Johnson Dr Ste 3 · (240) 422-8433 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
177 Thomas Johnson Dr · (301) 835-7938 · Call to confirm hours
Park
409 Delaware Rd · (301) 696-8588 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.7%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.5%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%2.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.3%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.4%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.7%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.6%13.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.0%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.5%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.2%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.541.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.391.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 215 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.1%CMS range 47.4–59.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 8.1–13.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.3–10.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.791.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.44
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
26.1%
Total nursing turnover
8.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 196 beds and averages 110.8 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 85 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.551 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
33
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

67 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with an elopement risk had the appropriate interventions in place to prevent an elopement. This was evident for 1 (#109) of 10 residents reviewed for elopement. Evidence was provided by the facility that an action plan was developed, and corrective measures were implemented on 4/30/24, immediately after the incident, to remove the immediacy of the noncompliance and correct the deficient practice. On 8/20/24, a determination of immediate jeopardy was made regarding the deficient practice with the potential for past non-compliance. The Director of Nursing and Corporate Clinical Director Nurse #2 were informed at 5:45 PM. Review of all facility corrective actions implemented prior to the survey start date, revealed that the facility had met minimum standards for plans of correction and the concern was therefore deemed past noncompliance. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff reported environmental concerns to maintenance. This was found to be evident for one out of seven rooms reviewed for potential environmental concerns.The findings include: On 1/22/26 at 2:17 PM while interviewing Resident #5 in the resident's room, the Surveyor heard what sounded like a lawn [NAME] or a chain saw. The resident reported the noise was coming from the window. The Surveyor then observed an approximately 18 inch area of tape on the window and noted the sound was present when the wind blew. The resident indicated the window had been like that for more than several months.On 1/28/26 at 1:56 PM when asked how he monitors items in need of repair, the Maintenance Director (#15) reported they have the TELS system. The Surveyor requested any work orders for Resident #5's window.TELS is a computer-based system used to track building maintenance. Staff that have access to TELS can put in maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that the resident or the resident's representative was notified in writing of the facility's bed hold and transfer policies at the time of hospital transfer. This deficient practice was identified for 2 residents (Residents #1 and #90) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the survey.The findings include:1. On 1/23/26 at 1:36 PM a record review of Resident #1's electronic health record revealed Resident #1 was hospitalized on [DATE]. Further review revealed that Resident #1's Power of Attorney (POA) was notified via telephone of transfer as well as the bed hold policy. On 1/28/26 at 11:57 AM, in an interview, Business Office Manager (Staff #17) acknowledged that the hospital transfer policy states that a bed hold notice should be provided in writing to the resident/ resident representative within 24 hours. She could not provide evidence that a written bed hold notice was provided to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's comprehensive care plan accurately reflected the resident's discharge wishes. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #75) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge planning.The findings include:A comprehensive care plan is a personalized document that organizes a person's medical treatment, daily support needs, and their exit strategy from long-term care, known as discharge planning.On 1/22/26 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #75, who stated they were in a pickle because they wanted to return to the community to work; however, their car was broken and all of their belongings were currently in the facility. When asked whether there was an active plan in place to assist with transitioning from long-term care to the community, the resident stated they were not aware of any such plan.On 1/28/26 at 3:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #75's discharge care plan dated 12/22/25 and completed by the Social Worker (SW #23), which stated, [Resident's name]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence of coordination of care with hospice services. This was evident for 1 (Resident #19) of 3 residents reviewed for hospice/end-of-life care.The findings include:On 1/29/26 at 5:19 PM, the surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #19 and discovered that the resident was admitted to hospice services on 12/1/2025. Further review revealed that the care plan had been updated to include hospice services and stated: Approach Start Date: 12/01/2025. If using hospice services, the facility will coordinate care approaches, schedules, and tasks with the chosen provider. Created: 12/01/2025. The record also included new physician orders; however, the surveyor was unable to locate hospice communication notes.On 1/30/26 at 12:11 PM, the surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #24) and asked him to explain how communication between hospice services and the facility occurs. He stated, There isn't a communication book. We just receive orders which are dropped off in boxes in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter bags were emptied as ordered. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #4) out of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheter usage.The findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident has an indwelling foley catheter and a history of urinary tract infections. The resident was treated with antibiotics for a urinary tract infection in December 2025. A indwelling foley catheter consists of a flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder via the urethra, and is anchored in the bladder via a small inflated balloon. The tubing allows for continuous drainage of the bladder into a catheter bag. The resident has an order, in place since 10/31/25, to empty foley catheter bag every shift and document the output. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed an area for nurses to document regarding this order, including a space to document the amount of urinary output. On 1/30/26 at 12:56 PM interview with Nurse #18 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy per the physician's order. This was evident for 1 (Resident #7) out 1 resident reviewed for oxygen therapy during the survey.The findings include:Oxygen therapy is an intervention of delivering oxygen through a device such as a nasal cannula (small tubes that rest in your nostrils) or a mask. Oxygen therapy is prescribed by a doctor and tailored to each person's needs.On 1/22/26 at 10:26 AM this surveyor observed Resident #7 was receiving oxygen (O2) at 5 liter/minute via nasal cannula.On 1/30/26 at 9:48 AM a record review of Resident #7 Care Plan revealed the resident is at risk for respiratory distress/shortness of breath due to diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). One of the interventions was to administer O2 as ordered. On 1/30/26 at 10:31 AM a record review of physician orders revealed: O2 at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. On 1/30/26 at 11:35 AM this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure side rails were only used when the resident assessment indicated a need for them and a physician order was in place for their use. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #60) out of three residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed a diagnosis of dementia and a January 2026 Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment.On 1/29/26 at 11:31 AM resident was observed sitting on side of their bed, quarter side rails were noted to be in the up position on both sides of the bed.Even when bed rails are properly designed to reduce the risk of entrapement or falls, are compatible with the bed and mattress, and are used appropriately, they can present a hazard to certain individuals, particularly to people with physical limitations or altered mental status, such as dementia or delirium.Review of the facility policy for side rails, titled Enablers with a revision date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff received education based on findings from their annual performance evaluations. This was evident for 2 (Staff #25 and #26) of 3 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) reviewed during the staffing task.The findings include:On 1/28/26 at approximately 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the annual performance evaluations for three GNAs (#25, #26, and #27). The evaluations revealed that both GNA #25 and GNA #26 received a score of 1, defined as Performance Below Standard. Comments included Relias 0% and Needs to do Relias. Relias is the program used by the facility to provide staff education.On 1/28/26 at 1:07 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and expressed concerns regarding gaps in staff education, noting that review of the performance evaluations identified incomplete required training. The NHA acknowledged that there is an issue with staff completing required courses. She stated that she began looking into the matter following the surveyor's request for records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident for behavioral health needs following a change in behavior. This was evident for 1 (Resident #121) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents during the survey.The findings included: On 1/29/26 at 2:15 PM, review of intake #2714236 revealed that Resident #121 was transported to the hospital for a behavioral emergency on 1/11/26.On 1/29/26 at 2:20 PM, review of progress notes added as a late entry on 1/12/26 and dated 1/9/2026 revealed that Social Services visited Resident #121 based on concerns expressed by a staff member to check on the resident's welfare. Further review of the Social Services note revealed that the resident was calm, pleasant, and redirectable. Continued review failed to reveal that a suicide ideation assessment interview was completed with Resident #121.On 1/29/26 at 2:25 PM, continued review of a progress note dated 1/11/2026 revealed that Resident #121 was found lying on the floor with a plastic bag over their head. Continued review revealed that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist's monthly medication regimen review identified significant medication errors. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #4) out of six resident's reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include: 1) On 1/23/26 review of Resident #4 medical record revealed a diagnosis of diabetes and orders for both long acting and fast acting insulin. The order for the fast acting insulin, with a start date of 10/31/25, included: Humalog KwikPen Insulin (insulin lispro) pen with a strength of 100 units per ml and the amount to be given was per carb intake. The order also included the following Special Instructions: method for calculating insulin coverage. Blood glucose -100=X Round X to the nearest 10th. Give 1 unit of insulin for each 10mg/dL. Resident will continue to calculate with each dose. (example BS is 294. 294-100= 194. Resident to get 19 units of insulin). This insulin was to be administered before meals and at bedtime.Blood glucose is also referred to as blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 56 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #4) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include: 1)On 1/23/26 review of Resident #4 medical record revealed a diagnosis of diabetes and orders for both long acting and fast acting insulin. The order for the fast-acting insulin, with a start date of 10/31/25, revealed a Humalog KwikPen Insulin (insulin lispro) with a strength of 100 units per ml and the amount to be given was per carb intake. The order also included the following Special Instructions: method for calculating insulin coverage. Blood glucose -100=X Round X to the nearest 10th. Give 1 unit of insulin for each 10mg/dL. Resident will continue to calculate with each dose. (example BS is 294. 294-100= 194. Resident to get 19 units of insulin). This insulin was to be administered before meals and at bedtime.According to these special instructions, any blood glucose level above 110 would require…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were secured and stored at the required temperature and that the narcotics were stored in permanently affixed compartments. This deficiency was evident for 1 out of 3 narcotic boxes observed, 1 out of 3 medication refrigerators observed, and 1 medication cart observed during a random observation.1.On 1/27/26 at 2:27 PM, an observation was made of the medication room on the [NAME] Creek unit with Staff #4. Review of the medication refrigerator revealed a narcotic box with a lock on the front side. Further observation showed that the box was not affixed to the refrigerator.On 1/27/26 at 2:29 PM, during a brief interview, Staff #4 reported that the narcotic box could be removed from the refrigerator.On 1/27/26 at 3:54 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON), was interviewed and stated that the expectation was for all narcotic boxes in the medication refrigerators have to be locked and be permanently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure concerns identified through the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process were addressed through the development of a Performance Improvement Project (PIP). This was evident for 1 of 1 QAPI plans reviewed during the QAA/QAPI task.The findings include:In long-term care, the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) and Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) programs are systems designed to monitor care, identify concerns, and implement corrective actions to protect resident health and safety. QAA focuses on identifying and correcting areas of noncompliance, while QAPI uses ongoing data analysis and proactive improvement efforts to prevent problems and improve outcomes. Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) are structured, team-based initiatives within QAPI used to investigate identified concerns, determine root causes, and implement measurable system improvements.On 1/27/26 at 1:23 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) and asked her to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately wore source control (face masks) during a period of increased influenza in the community. This was found to be evident during 6 random observations made on day one of the survey.The findings include: On 1/22/26 at 8:25 AM the survey team entered the facility. Night nurse supervisor #37 reported that due to the high flu rate in the county face masks were currently required. On 12/31/25, the Maryland Department of Health (MDH) issued recommendations in response to increased rates of respiratory virus-associated hospitalizations. MDH advised that healthcare facilities implement facility-wide source control measures in patient care areas and other patient-facing settings. These measures include requiring all individuals-including clinical staff, non-clinical staff, and visitors-to wear masks in patient-facing areas.On 1/22/26 at 10:17 AM the surveyor observed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #39) coming out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure employees completed required annual training. This was evident for 4 (Staff #10, #11, #16, and #29) of 5 staff reviewed for the sufficient and competent staffing task.The findings include:On 1/27/26, the surveyor requested that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) provide education records for Staff #10, #11, #16, #29, and #30, as well as annual performance evaluations for three Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs #25, #26, and #27).On 1/28/26 at approximately 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the annual performance evaluations for GNAs #25, #26, and #27. The evaluations revealed that both GNA #25 and GNA #26 received a score of 1, defined as Performance Below Standard. Comments included Relias 0% and Needs to do Relias (Relias is the program used by the facility to provide staff education).Further review of training records for Staff #10, #11, #16, #29, and #30 revealed the following:-Compliance and Ethics Training (F946) was not completed by Staff #10, #11, or #16-Dementia Training (F949) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policies and procedures by 1) failing to report all allegations of abuse to the state agency and the facility's abuse coordinator and 2) failing to conduct a thorough investigation of all allegations of abuse. This was evident for 1 of 1 policies and procedures reviewed for abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment and has the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The findings include: A review of the facility's abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment policies and procedures was conducted on 8/26/24 at 2:19 PM. The policies and procedure indicated in the bottom of the document that it had a complete revision on 11/1/2017. In the section under Policy, item number 2. indicated that if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse, the facility shall report immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including state survey agency) in accordance with the state law. Item…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) have an effective system in place to ensure that all allegations of abuse are reported to the state agency, 2) to ensure that reports are sent within the mandated timeframe, and 3) to report the results of the investigation no later than 5 working days after the incident. This was evident in 6 (Resident #19, #9, #6, #25, #67, and #92) of 21 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) On 8/26/24 at 2:50 PM, a review of facility reported incident MD00200510 revealed that, on the morning of 12/12/23, Resident #25 reported to a staff member that a GNA (geriatric nursing assistant) had made a movement like s/he was going to hit the resident. On the self-report form, the facility documented the date of the incident was 12/11 to 12/12/23 and reported by the resident on 12/12/23. The facility's initial self-report indicated the allegation of abuse was reported to the state agency on 12/12/23 at 12:40 PM and the final report was reported to the state agency on 12/19/23 at 1:50 PM. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation of abuse and maintain evidence of the investigation. This was evident for 7 (#424 #19, #9, #41, #92 #322, #67 ) of 21 residents reviewed for abuse and for 3 facility reported incidents reviewed for abuse (FRIs) (#MD00194834, and #MD00207292, and #MD00191798), of 34 FRIs investigated during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1). On 8/27/24 at 12:03 PM a review of the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) report #MD00194834 revealed an allegation that staff mistreated Resident #322 on 7/27/23 when they ripped the remote control from the resident's hand. On 8/27/24 at 12:10 PM, the facility's investigation file was obtained and reviewed. Although the file contained a suspension notice for a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #38), the file lacked 1) any staff witness statements, 2) evidence that Resident #322 had a physical assessment done after the incident, and 3) assignment sheets of staff on duty at the time of the incident. 4) demographic and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) had annual performance evaluations. This was evident for 3 GNAs (GNA #11, GNA #13, and GNA #14) of 3 GNAs reviewed during the Sufficient and Competent staffing task portion of the recertification survey. This had the potential to impact all residents. The findings include: On 8/20/24 at 10:00 AM, the annual performance evaluations were requested for GNA #11, GNA #13, and GNA #14 for 2019 through 2023. On 8/20/24 at 1:00 PM, the requested files were received and reviewed and revealed that each file lacked evidence of a performance evaluation in 2022, and GNA #13's file also lacked evidence of performance evaluations in 2020, 2021, and 2023. On 8/23/24 at 9:27 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Director of Human Resources (Staff #24) was conducted. They both confirmed the lack of evidence that GNA #11, GNA #13, and GNA #14 had performance evaluations in 2022, and that there was no evidence that GNA #13 had performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post actual hours of nursing staffing. This was evident for 31 of 31 days in July 2024 and 21 of 21 days in August 2024 during the Sufficient Staffing task investigation during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 8/22/24 at 3:54 PM, staff posting documents for July and August 2024 (to date) were requested. On 8/23/24 at 8:33 AM, a record review of staff posting documents for July 1-31, 2024, and August 1-22, 2024, revealed that there were blank spaces on each form where the actual hours for each nursing discipline was to have been recorded. On 8/23/24 at 11:55 AM in an interview with the DON regarding the staff posting documents for July and August, she confirmed that none of the staff posting documents listed actual hours worked and she confirmed that this was a deficiency.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate administrative oversight of 1) nursing staffing, 2) reporting of allegations of abuse, 3) Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) training, and 4) clinical services. This was evident for 1) non-compliance with 2 (S670, S680) of 2 state staffing regulations, 2) 6 residents (#6, #9, #19, #25, #67, #92) of 6 residents who alleged abuse, and 3) 6 staff (GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12) of 6 staff reviewed for required in-service training, and 4) 2 complaints (#MD00208809 and #MD00208775) of 7 complaints and for 5 (#MD00206318, #MD00202094, #MD00182597, #MD00205031, MD#00205130) of 34 facility reported incidents (FRIs), reviewed during the recertification survey. These findings had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 8/27/24 at 2:52 PM, the survey team identified substandard quality of care which triggered an extended survey investigation. On 8/27/24 at 3:19 PM, an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility's nursing staff failed to follow basic infection control procedures and standard precautions during medication administration as evidenced by 1) failing to perform routine cleaning and disinfection of resident care equipment shared among residents, and 2) failing to follow standard precautions when performing routine testing of blood glucose. This was evident for 3 (#16, #19, #23) of 5 nurses observed for medication administration. The findings include: 1) On 8/26/24 at 8:58 AM, during an observation of medication administration, the surveyor observed Staff #16, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) remove a blood pressure (BP) monitor with an attached BP cuff from the medication cart. Staff #16 was then observed using the BP monitor to check Resident #92's blood pressure. Staff #16 then returned the BP monitor to the medication cart. No observation was made of Resident #16 sanitizing the BP cuff prior to use or following its use on Resident #92. On 8/26/24 at approximately 9:10 AM, during an observation of medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) were offered to receive and be educated about COVID-19 immunization. This was evident for 6 staff (GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN # 9, LPN #10, and LPN #12) of 6 staff reviewed for immunizations during a portion of the infection control investigation during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 8/20/24 at 10:00 AM, the immunization records for GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN # 9, LPN #10, and LPN #12 were requested. On 8/20/24 at 1:18 PM, a review of the immunization records for GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN # 9, LPN #10, and LPN #12 revealed that none of the staff had any evidence that they had received a COVID-19 vaccine or education regarding COVID-19. On 8/22/24 at 4:25 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Human Resources (Staff #24) who confirmed that there was no evidence that COVID vaccines were offered or that education on COVID-19 was provided for GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0941 — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide communication training to staff. This was evident for 3 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA #11, GNA #13, and GNA #14) of 3 GNAs reviewed, and 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12) of 3 LPNs reviewed during the extended survey investigation of the recertification survey and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 8/20/24 at 10:00 AM, training records for GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12 were requested. On 8/20/24 at 1:18 PM, the requested employee training records were received and reviewed for the competent staffing investigation portion of the survey. On 8/27/24 at 2:52 PM, it was determined that there was a situation of substandard quality of care and the extended survey task was triggered. On 8/27/24 at 3:37 PM, a review of the employee training records revealed that GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN #9, LPN #10, nor LPN #12 had evidence of the federally required communication training. On 8/27/24 at 3:53 PM, an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0942 — widespread
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff were trained about resident rights. This was evident for 2 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA #11, GNA #13) of 3 GNAs reviewed, and 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12) of 3 LPNs reviewed during the extended survey investigation of the recertification survey and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 8/20/24 at 10:00 AM, training records for GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12 were requested as part of the Sufficient and Competent Staffing portion of the standard survey. On 8/27/24 at 2:52 PM, it was determined that substandard quality of care existed and the extended survey task was triggered. On 8/27/24 at 3:37 PM, a review of the employee training records revealed that GNA #11, GNA #13, LPN #9, LPN #10, nor LPN #12 had evidence of resident rights training in 2022, 2023, or 2024. On 8/27/24 at 3:53 PM, an interview with the Human Resources Director (Staff #24) was conducted and she was asked for any evidence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0943 — widespread
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff members complete abuse and neglect training. This was evident for 4 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, and GNA #34) of 4 GNAs reviewed, and 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12) of 3 LPNs reviewed during the annual and extended survey investigation. The findings include: 1) On 8/20/24 at 10:00 AM, training records for GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12 were requested. On 8/20/24 at 1:18 PM, a review of the employee training records revealed that staff lacked annual abuse and neglect training. GNA #11 and GNA #13 lacked abuse and neglect training in 2022. LPN #10 and LPN #12 lacked abuse and neglect training in 2021 and 2022. GNA #14 lacked abuse and neglect training in 2022, and 2024. And LPN #9 lacked abuse and neglect training in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024. On 8/27/24 at 3:53 PM, an interview with the Human Resources Director (Staff #24) was conducted and she was asked for any additional evidence of abuse and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) training to staff. This was evident for 3 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA #11, GNA #13, and GNA #14) of 3 GNAs reviewed, and 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12) of 3 LPNs reviewed during the extended survey investigation of the recertification survey and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 8/20/24 at 10:00 AM, training records for GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12 were requested. On 8/20/24 at 1:18 PM, the requested employee training records were received and reviewed for the competent staffing investigation portion of the survey. On 8/27/24 at 2:52 PM, it was determined that there was a situation of substandard quality of care and the extended survey task was triggered. On 8/27/24 at 3:37 PM, a review of the previously provided employee training records revealed that neither GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN #9, LPN #10, nor LPN #12 had evidence of the federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide behavioral health training to staff. This was evident for 3 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA #11, GNA #13, and GNA #14) of 3 GNAs reviewed, and 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12) of 3 LPNs reviewed during the extended survey investigation of the recertification survey and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 8/20/24 at 10:00 AM, training records for GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12 were requested. On 8/20/24 at 1:18 PM, the requested employee training records were received and reviewed for the competent staffing investigation portion of the survey. On 8/27/24 at 2:52 PM, it was determined that there was a situation of substandard quality of care and the extended survey task was triggered. On 8/27/24 at 3:37 PM, a review of the employee training records revealed that neither GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN #9, LPN #10, nor LPN #12 had evidence of behavioral health training. On 8/27/24 at 3:53 PM, an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the primary care provider when there was a resident change of condition or a potential need to alter treatment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #28) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record on 8/29/24 revealed that the resident had a diagnosis of hypothyroidism and has had an order for levothyroxine once a day since 7/10/24. On 8/29/24 at 11:15 AM, review of Resident #28's medication administration revealed that the resident refused levothyroxine on 15 days between 7/12/24 and 8/3/24. Levothyroxine is a thyroid medication that is used to treat an underactive thyroid gland. The thyroid gland makes thyroid hormones which help to control energy levels and growth. When the medication is not taken, the thyroid level can be out of normal range. On 08/29/24 at 11:57 AM, review of Resident #28's medical record failed to reveal that the primary care provider was notified of the repeated medication refusal. On 8/29/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#95) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, 1 (#112) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents and and 3 (#1, #33, #6) of 3 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. The last day of this observation period is the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). This is the end date of the observation period and provides a common reference point for all team members participating in the assessment. In completing sections of the MDS that require observations of a resident over specified periods such as 7, 14, or 30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed conduct care plan meetings and review and revise resident care plans after each assessment. This was evident for 1 (#25) of 3 residents reviewed for communication/sensory, 1 (#95) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory and 1 (Resident #6) of 2 residents reviewed for care planning. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility with the information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the residents care. 1) On 8/15/24 at 5:15 PM, Resident #95 was observed to be receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula (device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose), which was connected to an oxygen concentrator. At that time, Resident #95 was also observed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. This was found to be evident based on 4 errors identified out of 25 opportunities for error, resulting in a 16% medication administration error rate. The findings include: 1) On 8/26/24 at 9:10 AM, during an observation of medication administration, the surveyor observed that Staff #16, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) dispensed 9 medications into a medication cup, including Acetaminophen 500 mg (milligram), 1 tablet for Resident #41. At that time, Staff #16 reported to the surveyor that Resident #41 had an order for a multi-vitamin which included minerals and iron, that was not available in the medication cart. Staff #16 indicated that s/he would notify the person responsible for ordering the stock medications of the need to obtain the multi-vitamin form that was ordered for the resident. 1a) Following the medication observation, a review of Resident #41's August 2024 MAR (medication administration record) revealed a physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the conditions of the facility were safe, clean, and without unaddressed concerns. This was found to be evident for 1 ([NAME] Creek 2 unit) out of 4 units observed throughout the survey. The findings include: 1) On 08/15/24 at 10:27 AM, an initial observation on the [NAME] creek 2 unit revealed an area about 10 inch wide where wallpaper was torn, and some pieces of drywall were noted to be crumbled right above the floor, behind the entry door of room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 08/15/24 at 12:26 PM, further observation on the [NAME] Creek 2 unit revealed about 5 inches of wallpaper peeled off about one third of the way to the ceiling outside of the dining room doorway, about a 6 foot tea-like stain on the floor in front of the water fountain, a section of the bottom corner of the nurses station which looked to be damaged, and a rolling chair at the nurses station where several pieces of the outside material had been stripped. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from abuse. This was evident in 4 (Resident #9, #28, #104, and #424) of 21 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility with the information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. 1) On 8/22/24 at 8:53 AM, a review of the facility's investigation file for the facility reported incident #MD00182597 revealed a self-report form that documented a staff member had witnessed Resident #424 being abused on 4/20/22 at 2:30 PM by another staff member. Review of Physical Therapist (PT) #52's handwritten statement, dated 4/20/22, revealed that she had answered Resident #424's call light and the resident asked to go to bed. PT #52 reported that she asked the resident's assigned geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) #53 to assist her with the transfer. She stated that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement interventions based on a resident's comprehensive care plan. This was evident for 1 (#25) of 3 residents reviewed for communication/sensory and 1 (#108) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care 1) On 8/16/24 at 11:16 AM, during an interview, Resident #25 appeared hard of hearing and had difficulty hearing the surveyor. When asked if the resident attended activity programs, Resident #25 stated s/he did not attend activity programs because s/he could not hear. Resident #25 also reported that the resident could not hear at all in one of his/her ears, and s/he was hard of hearing in the other ear. Resident #25 also reported s/he had hearing aids that had not been worn since forever. On 8/21/24 at 11:25 AM, a review of Resident #25's medical record revealed a communication care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure activities were provided to residents based on their preferences and as indicated in their care plan. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #113 and #28) out of 5 residents reviewed for activities. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #113's medical record revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment date of 6/7/24, that revealed the resident was interviewed in regard to Activity Preferences and that the resident had indicated it was very important to listen to music that s/he likes and to be around animals such as pets. Review of the care plan for activities, created on 6/6/24, revealed several approaches including: Provide activity calendar and review some of the programs and available materials and equipment available for use; Staff will meet with resident to see if enjoyment is gained from activities or self-directed routine; Staff will assist resident in participating in favorite activities such as watching tv; Staff will encourage resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) have a process in place to monitor resident's air pressure mattress settings and ensure that they were appropriate for the resident's current weight which resulted in a harm to Resident #3 and 2) ensure that a resident's change in condition was evaluated by a primary care provider. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 8 residents reviewed for falls and 1 (#110) of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. The findings include: Low air loss mattresses are designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad surface area and help prevent skin breakdown. Air continually flows through tiny laser-made air holes in the top of the mattress surface so that the user floats on a soft cushion of air. (https://homecarehospitalbeds.com). A control box is placed on the footboard that controls the air flow into the mattress. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) A medical record review for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities. This was evident for 1 (#25) of 3 residents reviewed for communication/sensory. The findings include: On 8/16/24 at 11:16 AM, during an interview, Resident #25 appeared hard of hearing and had difficulty hearing the surveyor. When asked if the resident attended activity programs, Resident #25 stated s/he did not attend activity programs and indicated it was because s/he could not hear. Resident #25 also reported that s/he could not hear at all in one of his/her ears, and hard of hearing in the other ear. When asked if the resident had hearing aids, Resident #25 responded that s/he had hearing aids, but reported that the hearing aids had not been worn since forever. On 8/21/24 at 11:25 AM, a review of Resident #25's medical record was conducted. Review of Resident #25's July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a 1/24/23 physician order to place hearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a process was in place to ensure that recommendations made by therapy were communicated to and implemented by nursing. This was evident for 1 (Resident #37), out of 1 resident reviewed for position and mobility and 1 (Resident #28) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The findings include: 1) On 08/23/24, Resident #37's medical records were reviewed. The review revealed that Resident #37 was a long-term resident of the facility with a history of stroke, right-sided weakness, and decreased right-sided function. On 8/23/24 at 1:27 PM, Resident #37's Occupational Therapy (OT) documents were reviewed. The review revealed an OT evaluation and treatment certification, dated 6/20/24-8/18/2024. Further review revealed a section titled Recommendations: The recommendations included the following: Splint/Orthotic recommendations. It is recommended that the patient wear a hand roll and finger separators on the right hand for up to 6 hours a day, in order to improve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate and implement measures to address the resident's nutritional needs as evidenced by 1) failing to ensure that resident weights were obtained timely and as recommended by the dietician following a significant weight loss and 2) failing to ensure the physician was notified timely following a resident's significant weight loss. This was evident for 1 (#15) of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: On 8/16/24 at 12:16 PM, a review of Resident #15's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed documentation that, on 7/11/24 at 12:25 PM, the resident's weight was 296.4 pounds (lbs), and, on 8/7/24 at 1:51 PM, Resident #15 weight was 246.3 lbs which was a 50 lb (16.89 %) weight loss in 1 month, and indicated Resident #15 had a significant weight loss. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed that, on 8/12/24 at 3:10 PM, in a dietary progress note, the dietician wrote that Resident #15's weights were reviewed, that the resident's documented weight of 246.3 lbs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on pertinent document review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide physician services to a resident at least once every 120 days. Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received timely physician visits. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #92) of 2 residents reviewed for pain management and 1 (Resident #37), out of 6 Residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 8/23/24 at 10:44 AM, record review revealed that Resident #37 was a long-term resident of the facility. The review of physician notes in Resident #37's record revealed that the resident was seen by a physician twice between 8/01/23 and 8/26/24. On 08/26/24 at 11:36 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was interviewed regarding the expectations of how often a Physician visits a resident in the facility. The ADON reported that the expectation was that all residents are seen at least every 120 days by a physician. A nurse practitioner usually see…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a psychotropic medication prescribed as needed (PRN), had an end date that was limited to 14 days. This was evident for 1 (#95) of 1 residents reviewed for hospice. The findings include: On 8/20/24 at 3:30 PM, a review of Resident #95's medical record revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in April 2024 following an acute hospitalization. Resident #95 was admitted to hospice in mid-June 2024 with a terminal diagnose of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and a diagnosis of heart failure. Review of Resident #95's August 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a 6/17/24 order for Lorazepam (Ativan) concentrate by mouth every 4 hours PRN (as needed) for generalized anxiety disorder. The psychotropic medication prescribed to be administered as needed was not limited to 14 days duration, and there was no documented rationale for continuing the order beyond 14 days found in the resident's medical record. The concern with the Lorazepam as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, it was determined the facility failed to properly store medication as evidenced by failing to discard expired medications, failing to date medications when opened, and failing to return resident medication to a proper location after adminstration. This was evident for 2 of 5 medication carts, 1 of 1 treatment carts observed during the survey, and 1 complaint (#MD00207855) of 5 complaints reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 8/23/24 at approximately 2:15 PM, an observation was made of a Potomac 1 medication cart that revealed expired medication: 1a) There was 1 opened bottle of Lantaprost Opthalmic Solution (eye drops) labeled with Resident #108's name and marked an opened date of 6/6/24. Per the Mayo Clinic, an opened bottle of Lantaprost may be kept in the refrigerator or at room temperature for up to 6 weeks. Based on the date the Lantaprost was opened, the medication was expired. The facility failed to discard the discard eye drops 6 weeks after opening. 1b) There was a Bevespi inhaler that was labeled with Resident #15's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that potentially hazardous food items were cooled according to acceptable standards. This was found to be evident in 2 out of 2 kitchen observations. The findings include: On 8/15/24 at 9:54 AM, an inspection of the kitchens walk-in refrigerator was conducted with the dietary manager (Staff #3). During this inspection, 2 cooked food items were observed with no label. Staff #3 reported that they were chicken fried steak from last night's dinner and sausage patties from this morning's breakfast. Staff #3 indicated that she would label them to fix the concern. Shortly after at 9:57 AM, Staff #3 was asked if the 2 cooked food items were cooled down per regulation. Staff #3 reported that they should have been and indicated that the documentation should be in a binder close to the entrance of the kitchen. After reviewing the binder that contained the cool down log for potentially hazardous foods, Staff #3 stated, it's not done. Then proceeded to instruct a kitchen staff to pull the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to keep complete and accurate medical records as evidenced by an accurate indication for a medication and clinical assessment documentation. This was evident for 1 (#15) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication and 1 resident (Resident #51) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis care and services. The findings include: On 8/19/24 at 1:07 PM, a review of Resident #15's medical record revealed that the resident was initially admitted to the facility in June 2019 for long term care, then, readmitted to the facility in April 2024 following an acute hospitalization. The medical record also documented that Resident #15 had multiple diagnoses including extrapyramidal (involuntary muscle movements caused by some psychiatric drugs) and movement disorders, unspecified edema (swelling from build up of fluid in the body), major depressive disorder, and retention of urine (condition of being unable to completely empty the bladder). A review of Resident #15's August 2024 Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in a safe operating condition. This was evident for 1 kitchen observed during the survey. The findings include: On 8/15/24 at 9:47 AM, a tour of the kitchen was conducted with the dietary manager (Staff #3). During the tour, the walk-in freezer was inspected and was observed with icicle formation from the overhead fans extending about 3 feet long. Ice had also formed on the floor below the icicle at about 6 inches high and 5 inches in diameter. Staff #3 confirmed the observation and was taking notes and indicated that she would let maintenance know so that it could be taken care of. On 8/29/24 at 11 AM, the observation was discussed with the Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, and the Corporate Clinical Nurse (Staff #2) that the amount of ice buildup in the walk-in freezer did not accumulate overnight and that staff failed to maintain the freezer in a safe operating condition. All staff verbalized understanding and acknowledged the concern.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess staff training needs relative to the needs of the resident population of the facility. This was evident for the Facility Assessment reviewed during the extended survey portion of the recertification survey and had the potential to affect residents who receive dialysis care. The findings include: A copy of the Facility Assessment was requested on 8/15/24 during the survey entrance conference. On 8/16/24 at 9:32 AM, an observation and interview with Resident #51 was conducted as the resident wheeled down the hallway. The resident stated they were on their way to a dialysis center. On 8/28/24 at 9:20 AM, a review of the Care Program and Services section of the Facility Assessment indicated that the facility does not care for residents receiving dialysis. A review of the staff education needs portion of the Facility Assessment revealed that dialysis was not listed. On 8/28/24 at 11:36 AM, an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), the Director of Nursing (DON),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolated
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide infection control training to staff. This was evident for 1 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #9) of 3 LPNs reviewed during the extended survey investigation of the recertification survey. The findings include: On 8/20/24 at 10:00 AM, training records for GNA #11, GNA #13, GNA #14, LPN #9, LPN #10, and LPN #12 were requested. On 8/20/24 at 1:18 PM, the requested employee training records were received and reviewed for the competent staffing investigation portion of the survey. On 8/27/24 at 2:52 PM, it was determined that there was a situation of substandard quality of care and the extended survey task was triggered. On 8/27/24 at 3:37 PM, a review of the employee training records revealed that LPN #9 lacked any evidence of infection control training. On 8/27/24 at 3:53 PM, an interview with the Human Resources Director (Staff #24) was conducted and she was asked for any evidence of the infection control training for LPN #9. On 8/29/24 at 11:14 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to properly label beverages for resident consumption in 3 of 4 nourishment rooms and failed to properly clean and air dry dishes in the main kitchen. The findings include: On 10/3/19, the surveyor observed the nourishment rooms located on each of the 4 facility nursing units. On 10/3/19 at 11:07 AM, the refrigerator in the nourishment room on [NAME] Creek 1 was observed. 1 - 46 oz. (ounce) carton of Thickened Cranberry juice cocktail approximately ¼ full was labeled with 9/29. It did not have a second date. Several cartons of unopened med pass and juice were also labeled 9/29. On 10/3/19 at 11:12 AM, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #12 confirmed the date reflected when the juice was received in the kitchen, not when it was opened. A carton of thickened water was on top of the medication cart, opened labeled 10/1/19. LPN #12 indicated that she wrote the date on it when she opened it. She added that sometimes when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-10-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that effective quality assessment and assurance performance improvement interventions were implemented to address deficiencies from previous surveys. This was evident during review of the Quality Assurance program. The findings include: Review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Program with the QAA Coordinator, Staff #8 on 10/4/19 at 1:50 PM revealed that effective processes were not put in place regarding repeat deficiencies. The facility's action plans did not resolve quality deficiencies identified during the last recertification survey which concluded on 6/7/18 with a plan of correction date of 7/19/18. The repeat deficiencies reviewed included areas of 1) maintenance and housekeeping services, 2) accurate MDS assessments, 3) PASSAR Screening, 4) development and implementation of comprehensive care plans, 5) care plan timing and revision, 6) medication storage, 7) food storage, 8) accurate and complete medical records, 9) essential equipment, safe operating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to update care plans when there were changes in resident needs or preferences, failed to ensure that a care plan meeting was held after each assessment and failed to thoroughly evaluate/review and revise resident plans of care after each assessment. This was evident for 2 (#118, #108) of 5 residents reviewed for dementia care, 1 (#41) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and 2 (#17, #270) of residents reviewed for accidents. The finding include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. 1) Observations conducted by surveyors of Resident #118 on 9/22/19 at 10:57 AM, 9/23/19 at 2:10 PM, 10/1/19 at 9:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and interview with the resident and facility staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that resident's environment was free from accident hazards as is possible by 1) failing to ensure an outside exit door was securely latched for 1 of 2 ground floor nursing units, and 2) failing to maintain safe storage of resident smoking materials for 1 (#17) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: 1) On 9/22/19 at approximately 7:10 AM, the survey team attempted to enter the facility via the front door but found it locked. The surveyors walked around the right side of the building to the patio outside of the [NAME] Creek 1 dining/day room. A doorbell was observed on the wall beside the door, however, the door was unlatched and ajar. The survey team was able to open the door and enter the building without ringing the doorbell for assistance. No residents were observed in the dining/day room at that time. Staff were in the nurses station…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-04 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain a physicians' order for a resident to have 4 side rails up while in bed. This was evident for 1 (#78) of 1 residents reviewed for side rails. The findings include: Observations of Resident #78 on 9/22/19 at 3:01 PM, 9/23/19 at 2:30 PM and 3:45 PM, revealed the resident lying in bed with 4 side rails up. Another observation, on 10/3/19 at 1:09 PM, revealed the resident lying in bed with 4 side rails up. During an interview with Resident #78 on 10/3/19 at 1:09 PM, with a family member present, it was revealed that he/she had been in the bed since 12/2018 and the side rails had been attached when he/she switched to the bed. His/her family member stated they had not signed a consent form for the side rails until recently when he/she moved this room. Resident reported that prior to using this bed, he/she was able to sit on the side of the bed. A record review for Resident #78 on 10/3/19 at 12:51 PM, revealed on the 9/2019, physicians' order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication administration observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent for 3 (#37, #28, and #226) of 6 residents observed with 26 medication administration opportunities which resulted in an error rate of 34.62% by 2 (1 Licensed Practical Nurse and 1 (Registered Nurse) of 2 nurses observed. The findings include: 1) The Surveyor approached Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #15 on 9/26/19 at 7:30 AM, and was informed that surveyors would be observing her medication administration and informed her to continue her medication administration routine. She stated she had obtained vital signs (temperature, pulse, respirations, and blood pressure) on Resident #37 and was going to give him/her medications at this time. LPN #15 administered the following medications: Diltiazem 120 mg, 1 tablet, Lisinopril 5 mg 1 tablet, Ocuvite with Lutein 1 tablet, Gas Ban 1 tablet, Vitamin D3 2 tablets. She took them to Resident #37. A record review for Resident #37 on 9/26/19 at 10:15 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to keep complete and accurate medical records by failing to ensure that 1) a resident's use of bedside floor mats was accurately documented, 2) a resident's certification of incapacity was accurately completed by 2 physicians, and, 3) elopement risk assessments were accurate and complete. This was evident for 2 (#24, #40) of 5 residents reviewed for care plans and 5 (#70, #139, #2, #50 and #6) of 32 residents reviewed during the initial resident pool process. The findings include: An in room interview with Resident #24 was conducted at their request on 09/24/19 at 1:42 PM. Resident #24 stated that he/she had several falls and one time got a head injury that required 12 staples. The surveyor noted that, although there was a floor mat alongside the resident's roommate's bed, there were none at their bedside. When asked about the mats, the resident responded that they did not recall ever having fall mats. Review of Resident #24's medical record, conducted on 09/27/19 at 9:17 AM, revealed a plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appeal rights information by failing to issue the Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC); and failed to ensure that the resident, or their representative, of his/her potential liability for payment and related standard claim appeal rights by failing to issue the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN). This was found to be evident for 2 of the 3 residents (Resident #410 and Resident #115) reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification review. The findings include: On 10/3/19, review of documentation provided by the facility revealed that Resident #115 and Resident #410 were both discharged from Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining and remained in the facility. 1) The NOMNC provides notice to the resident of his/her right to an expedited review of a service termination. Review of Resident #410's documentation revealed that a SNFABN had been given to the resident on 7/3/19 due to his/her therapy services ending on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior. This was evident in the main kitchen and in 5 of 16 resident rooms on 2 of 4 nursing units observed during the initial survey pool observations. The findings include: 1) During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 9/22/19 at 8:45 AM, the surveyor observed large pieces of paint peeling from the walls to the left and right of the doorway to the hall in the area of the walk in refrigerator and dishwashing area of the kitchen. This was discussed with the Food Service Manager on 10/4/19 at 9:38 AM. He indicated that he didn't know why the paint was peeling, but the maintenance director was aware of it. 2) The following observations were made during initial observations of residents on 9/22/19, 9/23/19 and 9/24/19 and during environmental rounds with the Maintenance Director on 10/4/19 at 11:50 AM. In room [ROOM NUMBER], on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#270) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. On 9/27/19 at 9:06 AM, review of Resident #270's medical record revealed documentation that Resident #270 was sent to the hospital following a fall which resulted in a right hip fracture and returned to the facility following his/her hospital stay. On 8/13/19 at 4:36 PM, in a progress note, the nurse wrote that Resident #270 returned from the hospital, following a fall with a right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-04 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to screen two residents (#24) and (#135) to determine if the residents had or may have had a mental disorder (MD), intellectual disability (ID), or related condition. This was identified for 2 of 2 residents found to have remained in the facility for greater than 30 days without a Preadmission Screening. Findings include: The intent for this regulatory requirement is to ensure each resident in the nursing facility is screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission and that individuals identified with MD or ID are evaluated and receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to meet their needs. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility 4/4/19. Resident #135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of residents #24 and #135 medical record on 9/23/2019 revealed that the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I ID Screen for MI, ID, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow a resident's plan of care for smoking and failed to develop and implement resident centered care plans. This was evident for 3 ( #17, #24, #270) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents and 1 (#118) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 9/24/19 at 11:05 AM, the surveyor accompanied Resident #17 to the [NAME] Creek 1 patio during his/her smoke break. Staff #9 (an Activity Assistant) assisted the resident. The surveyor observed Resident #17 placing a cigarette lighter into his/her bag after lighting a cigarette. Staff #9 indicated that the resident's all keep their smoking materials in their possession with the exception of 1 resident whose cigarettes are locked in the activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for a resident who was dependent on staff to dress him. This was evident for 1 (#118) of 5 residents reviewed for ADLs. The findings include: ADLs are activities that people perform every day such as, getting dressed, taking showers or baths, cooking, and eating. Observations made of Resident #118 on 9/22/19 at 10:57 AM, 9/23/19 at 2:10 PM, 10/1/19 at 9:00 AM, and 10/2/19 at 9:01 AM and 10:07 AM, revealed the resident lying in bed and in a gown. A record review for Resident #118, on 9/27/19 at 10:48 AM, revealed a physician's statement, dated 6/11/18, that this resident had dementia, multiple sclerosis. A review of the current care plan revealed a focus (Resident #118) has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit r/t (related to) Limited RoM (range of motion) , limited mobility, and impaired balance with a goal that the resident will maintain current level of function - he/she is dependent for bed mobility, transfers, eating, dressing, toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in accordance with professional standards as evidenced by failure to follow a physician's order for a resident with a history of falls, failure to administer a dietary supplement as ordered by the physician and failure to obtain a dietitian consult as ordered by the physician. This was found to be evident for 1 (#24) of 5 residents reviewed for care plans, 1 (#161) of 3 residents sampled for closed record review and 1 (#50) of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: #1) An in room interview with Resident #24 was conducted at their request on 09/24/19 at 1:42 PM. Resident #24 stated that he/she had several falls and one time got a head injury that required 12 staples. The surveyor noted that although there was a floor mat alongside the resident's roommate's bed, there were none at their bedside. When asked about the mats, the resident responded that they did not recall ever having fall mats. Review of Resident #24's medical record conducted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and implement a resident-centered dementia care plan for a resident. This was evident for 1 (#118) of 5 residents reviewed for dementia. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. A record review for Resident #118 on 9/27/19 at 10:48 AM, revealed a physician's certified statement dated 6/2/14, which documented the resident had the following diagnoses; dementia, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's Disease. Review of the care plan revealed this resident had a dementia care plan with a goal that he/she will have improved quality of life by daily attempting to interact with others. Care plan had the following interventions: 1) instruct family/friends and staff in ways to support him/her 2) provide opportunities for resident to express feelings 3) provide opportunities for family and friend to encourage interactions with other residents. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, it was determined the facility staff failed to store resident care supplies in a sanitary manner. This was evident for 1 (#70) of 32 residents observed during the initial pool selection process and 4 of 5 medication carts observed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #70 and his/her room were observed on 9/24/19 at 12:26 PM. In the bathroom were 1 closed and one opened package of disposable briefs on the floor between the left side of the toilet and the wall. A urine/feces specimen collection pan was lying across the top of the waste basket, it was not labeled as to whom it belonged, properly stored to prevent cross contamination, or properly disposed of. These resident care items were stored in an unsanitary manner placing the resident at risk of exposure to potentially harmful organisms. On 9/24/19 at 12:34 PM, Unit Manager #27 confirmed these findings. 2) During an observation of Potomac 2 Medication Cart #1 on 09/26/19 at 9:48 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) #16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-10-04 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of daily staffing records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post the total number and actual hours worked by categories of Registered nurses, Licensed practical nurses, and Certified nurse aides per shift and failed to have the staff data available in an accurate clear and readable format. The findings include. Observations of the facility's staffing boards on 9/25/19 revealed that the facility did not display the actual hours worked by the staff to meet this regulatory requirement. The staffing boards on the four nursing units did not readily identify registered nurses or licensed practical nurses. On 9/25/19 at 9:50 AM, observations at the facility's main entrance did not reveal any posting of staffing. In the receptionist area behind a counter, was a ring-binder labeled daily staffing sheets. Upon request and review of the daily staff post sheets, the staffing sheets provided were a week behind. Interview of the nursing home administrator at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-10-04 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and interview with facility staff and residents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Essential Equipment was in safe operating condition. This was evident during observation of the main kitchen and [NAME] Creek 1 unit throughout the survey. The findings include: 1) During the initial tour of the main kitchen, on 9/22/19 at 8:45 AM, the surveyor observed the walk in freezer unit. The door of the freezer was split along the closing edge with the interior of the door separating from the exterior. Ice was formed along the inside of the door frame and edge of the door preventing the door from completely closing and latching. On the inside of the freezer, ice was built up along the right side of the door and the wall to the right of the door. The ice extended approximately 2 feet up and 4 inches out, over the floor. The interior handle and opening mechanism were covered in a thick layer of frost. The clear plastic strips of the barrier curtain were covered with thick frost. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,562 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,562 — penalty dated 2024-08-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir at MemorialDenison, TX 1 of 5Bennettsville Health And Rehabilitation CenterBennettsville, SC 1 of 5Calhoun Convalescent CenterSaint Matthews, SC 1 of 5Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the ParkwayCorinth, TX 1 of 5Forest Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation CtrCatonsville, MD 1 of 5Julia Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Lake Emory Post Acute CareInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenwoodGreenwood, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - InmanInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - Rock HillRock Hill, SC 1 of 5Oakbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterSummerville, SC 1 of 5Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOakland, MD 1 of 5Physical Rehabilitation And Wellness Center Of SpaSpartanburg, SC 1 of 5Riverside Health and RehabCharleston, SC 1 of 5San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care CenterRound Rock, TX 1 of 5Springdale Healthcare CenterCamden, SC 2 of 5Berlin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBerlin, MD 2 of 5Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBremond, TX 2 of 5Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCrownsville, MD 2 of 5Faith Healthcare CenterFlorence, SC 2 of 5Falcon Ridge RehabilitationHutto, TX 2 of 5Hillside Heights Rehabilitation SuitesAmarillo, TX 2 of 5Horizon Health And Rehabilitation CenterLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Lancaster Health and RehabilitationLancaster, SC 2 of 5Las Ventanas De SocorroSocorro, TX 2 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenvilleGreenville, SC 2 of 5Midlands Health & Rehabilitation CenterColumbia, SC 2 of 5Mira Vista CourtFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Moran Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWesternport, MD 2 of 5North Las Vegas Care CenterNorth las Vegas, NV 2 of 5Pavilion at Glacier ValleySlinger, WI 2 of 5Sandy Lake Rehabilitation And Care CenterCoppell, TX 2 of 5Southpointe Healthcare and RehabilitationGreenville, SC 2 of 5Spanish Hills Wellness SuitesLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Terra Bella Health and Wellness SuitesHouston, TX 2 of 5The Pavilion At CreekwoodMansfield, TX 2 of 5Villa Rosa Nursing And Rehabilitation, LLCMitchellville, MD 3 of 5Bridgecrest Rehabilitation SuitesHouston, TX 3 of 5Crimson Heights Health & WellnessHumble, TX 3 of 5Devlin Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCumberland, MD

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MARYLAND LONG TERM CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/18/2016
ROLES, MICHAELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/30/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$541K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 12%Other / private 16%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $541K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$386per resident / day
operating cost
$11,727per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$338per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215217. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next