No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Forest Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr

701 Edmondson Avenue, Catonsville, MD 21228 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 167 certified beds · (410) 747-7425 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 747-7425 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$273,754 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (18% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (82) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $273,754 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-01)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
910 Frederick Rd · (410) 644-1880 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
900 Edmondson Ave · (410) 719-6688 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
604 Frederick Rd · (410) 402-1009 · Call to confirm hours
Park
55 Wade Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
627 Edmondson Ave · (410) 741-3200

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased42.1%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms45.7%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.4%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.0%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.4%25.0%21.2%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.0%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.4%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.8%9.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.481.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.761.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.0–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge18.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified89.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.561.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
18.5%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 167 beds and averages 111.1 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 18% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

29
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-15)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

82 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 69 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure 1) adequate supervision while positioning a resident in bed during the provision of care and 2) residents did not have access to medications. This was evident for 2 of 30 residents (#13 and #26) reviewed for complaints and resulted in harm to Resident #13. The findings include: 1. On 4/21/25 at 9AM, a record review was conducted which revealed that Resident #13 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, wedge compression fracture of fourth thoracic vertebra, Hospice, and dementia. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a screening tool that is utilized to ensure each resident's individual needs are identified. A review of the MDS assessment, with an assessment reference date of 4/22/2023, identified that to turn from side to side and position body when in bed, the resident was extensive assistance on staff for the activity and required 2 staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, facility documentation, complaint MD00205968 and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from abuse. This was evident for 3 (Resident #2, #3, and #4) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse during a complaint survey. The findings include: Abuse, is defined at §483.5 as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Sexual abuse, is defined at §483.5 as non-consensual sexual contact of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, administrative record review, and staff interview; it was determined that the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #56) from verbal and physical abuse from a facility staff member. This caused harm to Resident #56. This was evident for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for abuse during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS): The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a comprehensive assessment of a resident completed by facility staff. The MDS is a multi-discipline tool that allows many facets of the resident's care (cognition, behavior, mobility, activities of daily living, accidents, activities, weight, pain, and medications to name a few) to be addressed. The MDS assessment is part of the broader Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process. The RAI process ties the assessment and care plan to the delivery of care to meet the needs of the resident. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment. This was evident pervasively throughout all resident floors of the facility's building.The findings include: 1. On 9/4/25 at 8:14AM the surveyor observed ripped areas in the flooring material in resident room # 202.2. On 9/4/25 at 8:26AM the surveyor observed resident room [ROOM NUMBER] with windows with a cloudy, unclean appearance and chipping wall paint.3. On 9/4/25 at 8:30AM the surveyor observed resident room # 110 with 2 out of 2 windows with a cloudy, unclean appearance and the surveyor noted the window glass in 1 out of 2 windows in the room had a large v-shaped crack present, and the privacy curtain was observed to have an unclean appearance with multiple brown stains, and chipping wall paint was observed. One area of plank type flooring was observed to be mismatched and gray in color with the surrounding brown flooring.On 9/4/25 at 9:20AM the surveyor conducted an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) ensure proper sanitation and food handling practices, 2.) properly monitor the temperatures of nourishment refrigerators, and 3.) ensure labeling and dating of food products and monitoring for expiration of food product. This was evident during the surveyor's tours of the facility's kitchen during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: 1. On 9/4/25 at 7:46AM the surveyor conducted an initial tour of the facility's kitchen. On 9/4/25 at 7:47AM the surveyor observed the reach in refrigerator with an unclean appearance. Black debris and food crumbs were observed in the bottom of the reach in refrigerator and the racks holding containers of food items were observed to have missing areas of paint. The surface of the walls within the reach in refrigerator had an unclean appearance with brown debris present. The handles to the reach in refrigerator were missing coverings revealing sharp edges. One unlabeled container…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and review of facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to implement, complete and accurately reflect a Facility Assessment regarding the facility's physical environment, equipment, and other physical plant considerations that are necessary to care for its population, as well as an evaluation of the facility building maintenance capital improvements, or structures. This was evident during survey with the potential to affect all residents. The findings include the following: During observational rounds of the facility and interview on 09/12/2025 at approximately 9:45 AM with Maintenance Director staff #18, the surveyor asked if there was a preventive maintenance plan in place for replacement or repairs of resident beds, resident furniture, electrical switches/outlets, painting of facility walls, condition of walls, condition of ceilings, conditions of floors, condition and functionality of showers, condition of building foundation, functionality of resident call bell systems and monitoring of decline of the overall facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure clean linen was handled and transported in a safe and sanitary manner. The was evident for 1 clean linen transportation cart observed; and 2) establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice was evident for the Water Management Plan investigated during the survey.The findings include: 1. On 9/5/2025 at 6:30AM, the Surveyor observed Staffing Coordinator #24 pulling a 2-shelf cart with blankets piled one on top of the other on the top and bottom shelf of the cart. The blankets were uncovered and 2 brown blankets, on the bottom shelf, were dragging on the floor as the staff pulled the cart onto the basement elevator. The Surveyor asked, Are the blankets clean? Staffing Coordinator #24 responded Yes. The Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) maintain laundry equipment in safe operating conditions. This deficient practice was evident for 1 of 4 washers and 4 of 5 dryers within the Laundry Room; and 2) maintain patient care equipment in a safe operating condition. This was evidence for 1 out of 4 Automatic External Defibrillators reviewed. The findings include: 1. On 09/12/2025 9:00 AM during record reviews and interviews pertaining to Complaint #309947 received on 5/21/25, it revealed the washing machine was broken, and we had to take the clothes home to wash them. During the interview the family stated that they were told during this time the machines were down but was never informed that the facility could still wash the resident clothing. Additionally, the family also shared they were never informed when the services resumed. On 09/12/2025 9:38 AM during observational rounds and interviews with the Director of Housekeeping/Laundry Account Manager Staff #8 in the Laundry Room, it revealed 1 of 4 washers and 4 of 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's call system was functioning properly. This was found to be evident for 2 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and #218) out of 17 rooms observed at Station 4 and 3 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #2 and #8) out of 13 rooms observed at Station 1. The findings include: 1. On 9/12/2025 at 2:47PM, 4 Surveyors toured Station 4 nursing unit. An observation was made of the call system at the nursing station and room [ROOM NUMBER]. A Surveyor observed the nursing station call system, there was an audible beeping noise coming from the call system, but no room number illuminated to indicate which room needed assistance. As the other Surveyors walked through the hallway, no light above any room illuminated to indicate which resident room needed assistance. Geriatric Nursing Assistant #23 was observed walking out of room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident #107's room. The Surveyor asked GNA #23 if Resident #107…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the exterior facility environment was maintained to be safe, sanitary. This was evident throughout the surveyors' tour of the exterior facility. The findings include: On 9/10/25 at 9:13AM the surveyor conducted a tour of the facility's exterior environment. 1a. On 9/10/25 at 9:13AM the surveyor observed a piece of white painted wooden board affixed to the front of the facility's entrance with visible black nails around the perimeter of the board, and several weeds sticking out from the side of the board. 1b. On 9/10/25 at 9:13AM the surveyor observed uneven depressed areas of missing and misplaced bricks at the entrance to the facility's main parking lot with weeds present, and felt movable bricks upon walking in the parking lot leading up to the concrete sidewalk near to the front doors of the facility. Weeds were observed present along the concrete sidewalk at the front entrance of the facility. 1c. On 9/10/25 at 9:14AM the surveyor observed sections of fencing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-15 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a handrail was firmly secured. This was evident for one handrail during a random observation on Station 3 during the surveyor's initial tour of the facility. The findings include: On 9/4/25 at 9:30AM the surveyor observed a handrail with a sharp edge present with a metal screw protruding from the wall in the hallway next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. The cap to the handrail was observed sitting on the opposite railing across the hall. Upon further inspection of the handrail the surveyor found the handrail to be loose and movable. On 9/4/25 at 9:34AM the surveyor conducted an interview and shared concerns with Unit Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse #6 who observed, acknowledged, and confirmed understanding of the surveyor's concerns and stated to the surveyor: Okay let me get maintenance, they replaced all this recently.On 9/4/25 at 9:36AM the surveyor shared concerns and conducted an interview with Maintenance Assistant #7, and after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident self-determination for bathing preferences such as methods and times. This was evident for 1 (#114) resident out of 8 residents investigated during the survey.The findings include:On 09/04/2025 at 11:30 AM during initial observation and interviews, Resident #114 was observed in bed and shared with surveyor of never being allowed to shower and that staff always give a bed bath. Surveyor asked Resident #114 when they ask for a shower, what happens; resident stated they are told, there is no shower chair large enough and the bathing area is too small. Surveyor asked Resident #114 if they have ever been taken to the shower, Resident #114 stated no, I am only bathed in the bed and often the sink water is cold or not warm enough.On 09/09/2025 2:49 PM during record review it revealed on the Matrix POC (Point of Care) for the period of 8/10/25-9/9/25, only complete or partial bed baths were noted as being completed or offered. During this same time only one refusal of a bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the medical director of recent testing results of the facility when there was a need to alter treatment or testing significantly. This was evident for 2 (#113 and #1) residents out of 6 residents investigated during the survey.The findings include:On 09/12/2025 2:50PM during facility record review of the 'Infection Control Log' received from the ADON/Infection Preventionist Staff #4 for the Infection Control Facility Task, it revealed the following for reporting period 7/1/25-7/31/25 with 3 episodes of pneumonia with onset dates of 7/8/25; 7/16/25; and 7/21/25. For reporting period 8/1/25-8/31/25 it revealed a potential spike with 6 episodes of pneumonia reported with onset dates of 8/1/25; 8/4/25; 8/8/25; 8/14/25; 8/15/25; and 8/26/25.On 09/12/2025 3:00PM during facility record review of the Water Management plan received from Maintenance Director Staff #18 for the Infection Control Facility Task it revealed 'Legionella Analytical' water test results dated 7/17/25 of water sampled on 7/1/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 69 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident personal and medical information was not publicly disclosed without consent. This deficient practice was evident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #20, #45, and #65).The findings include:On 09/12/25 at 9:14 AM, review of the facility's website foresthavennursingcenter.com revealed testimonials posted with full resident names, photos of the residents, and information related to medical diagnoses for Residents #20, #45, and #65. At 9:30 AM, the surveyor brought the website up for the Director of Nursing (DON) to see and requested to review the consents from the residents to use their information on a publicly accessible website.At 10:05 AM, review of the electronic medical record showed all three residents had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating they were cognitively intact.At 10:45 AM, the DON was unable to produce consents for Residents #45 and #65. A consent for Resident #20 was provided but was incomplete and verbally consented to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's Facility Reported Incidents and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse (Resident #54). This was evident for 1 out of 7 residents reviewed for abuse during the survey. The findings include: Surveyor's review of the medical record of Resident #54 on 9/8/2025 at 1:45PM revealed the following allegation of abuse made by Resident #54 was documented by Physician #39 on 6/18/25 at 12:45PM: Patient seen today for monthly evaluation, reports two females verbally abused him/her stating shut the f* up, reports s/he wants to go home, states s/he feels safe here but wants to go home. On 9/8/2025 at 2:07PM the surveyor conducted an interview of the facility's Administrator regarding the allegation documented in the 6/18/25 progress note, and inquired to them as to if the facility had a self-report for the documented verbal abuse allegation, to which the Administrator replied: Let me check on this. On 9/8/25 at 2:19PM the surveyor conducted an interview with Social Services Assistant Director (SSAD) #2 who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the written notification of transfer to the resident representative, provide written notification of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital to the resident representative, and ensure the local ombudsman was notified of a facility-initiated transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 1 (Resident #15) out of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey.The findings include:Bed Hold is holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization.On 9/5/2025 at 9:24AM, during a review of Resident #15's electronic medical record, the Surveyor discovered that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 6/23/2025 and 7/28/2025. On 9/8/2025 at 10:45AM, a review of Resident #15's electronic and paper medical record failed to reveal documentation to verify Resident #15's resident representative had been provided with written notification of the transfer to the hospital and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights and including the right to refuse treatment. This was evident for 1 (#1) resident out of 3 residents investigated for complaints during the facility's annual survey.The findings include:On 09/12/2025 11:00 AM during record review of Resident #1, it revealed the face and beard were being shaved against the family/POA preferences for resident; this occurred on more than one occasion. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident record review of Care Plan dated 05/28/25 revealed interventions for ADLs Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential, started 11/20/2023, which (Resident #1) requires assistance with ADL's R/T cognitive deficit; and Cognitive Loss / Dementia, started 12/06/2023, which stated (Resident #1) is unable to make daily decisions without cues/supervision R/T diagnosis of dementia.A progress note,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to facilitate timely care plan meetings after a resident's quarterly assessment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #14) out of 4 residents reviewed for care planning during the annual survey.The findings include:A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments and outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care. Care plans are developed, reviewed, and/or revised by the IDT after the completion of a comprehensive MDS assessment (Admission, Annual, Quarterly, Significant Change) to help to evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care while in the facility.The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a standardized, comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status to develop a plan of care based on the resident's individualized needs.Interdisciplinary team (IDT) is a team of medical professionals that provide specific patient centered care to the residents within a facility. On 9/8/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete residents Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) forms according to professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) out of 6 resident PASRR's reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:The PASARR process requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be screened for possible serious mental disorders(MD) or intellectual disabilities(ID) and related conditions. This initial pre-screening is referred to as PASARR Level I, and is completed prior to admission to a nursing facility. A negative Level I screen permits admission to proceed and ends the PASARR process unless a possible serious mental disorder or intellectual disability arises later. A positive Level 1 screen necessitates an in-depth evaluation of the individual by the state-designated authority, known as PASARR Level II, which must be conducted prior to admission to a nursing facility.PASARR Level II is a comprehensive evaluation by the appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed: 1) to ensure Resident (#117) was provided assistance necessary for an activity of daily living necessary to maintain proper nutrition. This was evident during a random observation; and 2) ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene. This was evident for 1 (#114) resident out of 8 residents investigated during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 9/15/25 at 1:05PM the surveyor observed Resident #117 in the hallway sitting in their wheelchair at an overbed tray table with their lunch situated on it, with their face down to their plate licking carrots with their tongue off of their plate to get them into their mouth to eat them. Resident #117 was subsequently observed with their face down to their pudding container licking the pudding out of the container to eat it. No staff were observed to be assisting or providing supervision for the resident during this time. The surveyor went to find staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an environment that is free from risks of accident hazards. This was evident for 1 (Resident #110) out of 6 residents reviewed during the survey. On 9/04/25 at 8:34 AM, during observation rounds, the surveyor observed Resident #110's toilet leaking water from the base. There was a large puddle of water on the bathroom floor surrounding the toilet. Also, the bathroom floor was slippery when walking on it. On 9/04/25 at 10:10 AM, the Director of Nursing staff #13 was interviewed. During the interview, the surveyor made staff #13 aware that Resident #110's toilet was leaking water from the base, and that there was a large puddle of water on the floor surrounding the toilet. Staff #13 mentioned that she would have maintenance repair Resident #110's toilet, and the puddle of water mopped from the floor.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were properly assessed for the safe use of bedrails, failed to obtain consent from the resident or resident representative prior to use of bedrails, and failed to complete a device assessment for the use of bedrails. This was evident for 2 (Resident #15 and # 65) out of 8 residents reviewed for accidents during the survey.The findings include: Bedrails, also known as side rails, are adjustable bars that attach to the bed. They vary in size, including full, half, and quarter lengths depending on their intended purpose. They can be used to prevent falls, help assist residents with movement, and provide a feeling of security. Bed rails also have potential risks associated with them, such as suffocation, entrapment, and psychological risks. A Resident or Resident's Representative should be provided with the risks and benefits along with a signed consent obtained before the use of bedrails. 1. On 9/4/2025 at 8:15AM, during a tour of Station 4, the Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for 2 of 26 opportunities reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in residents receiving medications contrary to physician orders and a medication error rate of 7.69%.The findings include:On 09/09/25 at 8:53AM, during the morning medication pass, Resident #21 was administered Topamax in a crushed form by Staff #14. During review of the resident's electronic medical record at 9:40AM it was revealed that the physician's order read for headache no crush, indicating the medication was to be given whole and was not to be crushed.On 09/10/25 at 8:22AM, during the morning medication pass, Resident #128 was administered Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg without food. Review of the physician's order indicated the medication was to be given with meals. Staff #15 was asked about the resident being given the medication without food and they stated the food trays were on their way. The surveyor observed that the resident was not served…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications and resident information were secured to prevent unauthorized access. This deficient practice was evident for 1 of 6 medication carts observed during the facility's recertification survey.The findings include:On September 4, 2025, at 7:42 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, surveyors observed an unlocked medication cart unattended in the hallway. The drawers of the cart were able to be opened by the surveyors and revealed medications as well as resident information with protected health information (PHI). No staff were present in the area at the time of the observation. At 7:46 AM, after two surveyors had walked the length of the unit in an attempt to locate a staff member, Staff #25 was located and alerted to the situation. The nurse for the unit was sent over to ensure the cart was secured. The Nursing Home Administrator was made aware of the findings at 12:17pm.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who requires dental services on a routine basis received necessary or recommended dental services in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #15) reviewed for dental services during the survey.The findings include:On 9/4/2025 at 11:20AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #15 in bed, with the head of the bed raised about 30 degrees. As the resident spoke to the Surveyor, the Surveyor observed a brownish yellow discoloration of their own natural teeth. The resident was unable to state the last time they were seen by a dentist.On 9/8/2025 at 1:33PM, during a review of Resident #15's electronic medical record, the Surveyor discovered an active physician's order dated 7/11/2025 for a Consult: Podiatry, Ophthalmology, Dental as needed. Further review failed to reveal the last time the resident was seen by the dentist.On 9/10/2025 at 8:14AM, the Surveyor conducted an interview with Social Service Director #1. During the interview the Surveyor was informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to make personal dietary choices. This was evident for 1 (#112) resident out of 8 residents investigated during the survey.The findings include:On 09/04/2025 11:08 AM during observations and interviews Resident #112 discussed with surveyor of never knowing what was coming up on the food tray at any meal. Surveyor asked resident if they have the monthly menu or alternative options; Resident #112 stated No. Of note, Resident #112 has history of Multiple Sclerosis, non-ambulatory and mostly dependent. No menu or alternative choices were observed available at resident bedside or posted on their poster board. Surveyor asked Resident #112, if meal alternatives were requested and provided when the resident requested and Resident #112 stated I used to, but I don't ask often anymore, I just accept what they give me.On 09/05/2025 11:00 AM during follow-up observation and interviews at Resident #112 bedside with LPN Staff #27 present at bedside. Surveyor notified staff of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medical records for a resident. This was evident for 1 (#71) out of 14 residents reviewed for advanced directives during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:On 9/4/25 at 12:50PM the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #71 which revealed the following information: 1.) 2 certifications of incapacity, 2.) a guardianship order, 3.) 2 Maryland orders for life sustaining treatment (MOLST) in which neither was voided, with one MOLST form documented as being certified by the resident on 6/7/2025, and the other MOLST form documented as being certified by the resident's guardian on 3/16/2023. The second page of one of the MOLST forms dated 6/7/2025 was observed to be incomplete without selections having been made for sections 2 through 9 of the form. Both MOLST forms were observed existing with the medical record simultaneously in the same sleeve of the hard chart. On 9/4/25 at 1:01PM the surveyor conducted an interview with Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that facility failed to ensure regular inspections of all bedrails being used by residents. This was evident for 2 (Resident #15 and #65) out of 8 residents reviewed for accidents during the survey.The findings include: Bedrails, also known as side rails, are adjustable bars that attach to the bed. They vary in size, including full, half, and quarter lengths depending on their intended purpose. They can be used to prevent falls, help assist residents with movement, and provide a feeling of security. Bed rails also have potential risks associated with them, such as suffocation, entrapment, and psychological risks. Assuring the correct use of an installed bed rail and maintenance of bed rails is an essential component in reducing the risk of injury. Entrapment is an event in which a resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail. 1. On 9/4/2025 at 8:15AM, during a tour of Station 4, the Surveyor observed Resident #15 in his/her room sleeping. The head of the bed was raised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have multiple-resident bedrooms that measure 80 square feet per resident. This was evident for 4 resident rooms (Room # 1, #5, #6 and #9) observed during the survey.The findings include: On 9/4/25 at 8:19 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator staff #3 and Director of Nursing staff #13 were interviewed. During the interview, staff #3 and #13 were asked if the facility had a waiver related to room sizes. Staff #3 stated that the facility did not have a waiver related to room sizes. On 9/11/25 at 10:03 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's CMS-2567 from the last recertification survey that was conducted on 8/2/2022. Review of the CMS-2567 revealed that facility was cited for having -multiple-resident bedrooms that measure less than 80 square feet per resident. On 9/4/25 at 2:37 AM, staff #3 was interviewed. During the interview, the surveyor asked staff #3 if room [ROOM NUMBER], 5, 6 and 9 were modified to ensure that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident rooms are equipped to provide visual privacy for each resident. This was evident for 2 resident rooms (Room # 1 and 8) observed during the survey.On 9/15/25 at 9:43 AM, during observation rounds with the Nursing Home Administrator staff #3 and the Maintenance Director staff # 18, the surveyor observed a missing privacy curtain for bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/15/25 at 9:44 AM, staff #3 and staff # 18 were interviewed. During the interview, staff #3 agreed that there was not a privacy curtain for bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/15/25 at 3:05 PM, during observation rounds with staff # 18, the surveyor observed a privacy curtain that did not pull across completely for bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/15/25 at 3:06 PM, staff #18 was interviewed. During the interview, staff #18 agreed that the privacy curtain for bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER] did not pull across completely, and that the track for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files and interviews with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs. This was evident during review of 1 (#12) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: During review of an allegation of staff to resident abuse, the employee file for Staff #16, a GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) was reviewed on 4/23/25 at 1:25 PM. The file revealed Staff #16 was hired on 5/30/18. A General Orientation Checklist was dated 5/30/18. The record failed to contain evidence that the facility conducted initial and periodic ongoing assessments of Staff #16's ability to competently perform the skills necessary to meet the needs of the resident population of the facility. On 4/23/25 at 8:00 AM the Administrator and Staff #10 the Clinical Services Director were informed that the surveyor was unable to find Staff #16's skills assessments. The Administrator returned on 4/23/25 at 1:55 PM and confirmed there were no skills assessments for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files and interviews with staff it was determined the facility Administration failed to complete performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education that was based on the outcome of the reviews. This was evident during review of 1 (#12) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: During review of an allegation of staff to resident abuse, the employee file for Staff #16, a GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) was reviewed on 4/23/25 at 1:25 PM. The file revealed Staff #16 was hired on 5/30/18. A General Orientation Checklist was dated 5/30/18. Only one annual performance evaluation was found in the file. On 4/23/25 at 8:00 AM the Administrator and Staff #10 the Clinical Services Director were informed that the surveyor was unable to find Staff #16's yearly evaluations. The Administrator returned on 4/23/25 at 1:55 PM. She confirmed that there were no yearly performance evaluations for Staff #16. An interview was conducted with the DON (Director of Nursing) on 5/1/25 at approximately 12:20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation during the initial tour of the main kitchen with facility staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to store food items in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety and prepare food under sanitary conditions. This was evident during 2 of 2 tours of the kitchen. The findings include: 04/21/2025 11:02 AM, a tour of the kitchen revealed the following: 1. Grease was layered in the tiles in the cooking area near the wall. 2. Paper, cupcake paper, plastic lids, parts of boxes, and other debris were found behind and under items in the kitchen. 3. There was dust and dirt on the floors under things and behind things. There was mouse traps set up throughout the kitchen, however no droppings were found. 4. The prep supply area was littered with debris and dirty. 5. Under the sink there was a pipe with insulation around it and the insulation was coming off near the bottom. 6. There was a mouse trap under the sink. 7. A piece of bread was lying next to the ice machine. Elbow noodles were laying on two gray carts and on the floor near…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation during tour of the facility's dumpster area, and smoking area it was determined the facility staff failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. . The findings include: On 4/24/2025 at 12 PM, a tour of the Residents smoking area revealed the following: 1. The ground litter of cigarettes butts. 2. Broken Pallets and chairs sitting next to the side of the building in front of the back gate. 3. One of the front gates to the side has a latch hook that can be open by Residents and putting them at risk to elope. The gate does not close tightly. 4. The area by the back gate has a pile of plywood, broken air conditioner, buckets, and trash. 5. Another area in front of the back gate had more plywood, and 3 air conditioners. 6. The food serving cart was in disrepair in the back of the yard. 7. Commercial hair drying unit in the back yard leaning on metal doors. 8. Four air conditioners sitting in the back of the yard with 2 more food carts. 9. 2 ladders up against the wall. 10. The open shed was litter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews it was determined the facility Administration failed to establish and ensure: 1) a system was in place to evaluate staff performance and provide required education as determined by staff performance reviews and the facility assessment; 2) policies and procedures were available and accessible to all staff; 3) the facility had an effective pest control program. This was evident during the complaint survey and has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: 1) The employee file for Staff #16, a GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) was reviewed on 4/23/25 at 1:25 PM. The file revealed Staff #16 was hired on 5/30/18. Staff #16's electronic training transcript revealed her last training pertaining to Resident Rights was 1/16/24. She received 0.5 hours of training related to cognitive Impairment and 0.25 hours related to Dementia on 6/23/24. There was no evidence that Staff #16 was provided with additional training on cognitive impairment and mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee that included the Medical Director and an Infection Preventionist. This was evident during review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement program. The findings include: The attendance sheets for the QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) committee meetings held from 4/2024 - 4/2025 were reviewed on 5/1/25 at 2:59 PM. The 2024 and 2025 QAPI meeting schedule reflected the dates of the monthly meetings and that Quarterly (Q) meetings were scheduled for January, April, July and October of both years. Review of the meeting sign-in sheets for each month revealed the following: 4/25/24 (Q) - The Infection Preventionist was not in attendance. 5/23/24 - The Infection Preventionist was not in attendance. 6/27/24 - The Medical Director and the Infection Preventionist were not in attendance. 7/25/24 (Q) - The Infection Preventionist was not in attendance. 8/29/24 - The Medical Director and the Infection Preventionist were not in attendance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment for their residents. This was evident throughout the facility and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: An observation of the second floor on 4/23/25 at 11:38 AM revealed that the heaters in the hallway were covered with dust. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the bathroom door had scuff marks that ran up about 2 feet and the veneer was coming away from the door near the doorknob, the sink was dripping water, veneer was coming away from the door at the doorknob. In the resident's room the flooring was cracked in 2 places in the middle of the floor, the wall was damaged outside the bathroom and repaired with spackling but was damaged again and unpainted. The heating vent that was under the sink was caked with dust. On 4/21/25 at 10:44 AM an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed there were gaps where the pipes runs into the wall. The vent under the window…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pest. This was evident throughout the facility and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: Review of the following complaints on 4/21/25 at 9:30 AM revealed: 1. In complaint #MD00199947, the complainant noted that the facility was mice infested, and mice feces could be found all over the resident's rooms. Unable to interview the complainant as they were anonymous. 2. In complaint #MD00205374, the complainant, who did not give their name, reported while visiting a family member in the facility they saw a mouse in their room. 3. In complaint #MD00210666, the complaint, who wished to remain anonymous, reported the facility had a history of pests in the building and there was presence of rodent droppings in the kitchen. An observation on 4/21/25 at 10:25 AM of the 2nd floor revealed a room that was used to store the clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was delivered to residents at an appropriate and palatable temperature. This was evident for 1 out of 1 observation of test tray temperatures. This practice has the potential to affect all residents who eat food prepared by the facility. The findings include: On 4/28/25 at 11:57 AM, the surveyor conducted a lunch tray line observation and requested the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) to include a test tray on the cart that was going to the unit. On 4/28/25 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor and the CDM followed the cart that was brought out to the unit to conduct the test tray. The cart was parked in one area in the hallway while the nursing staff were walking back and forth to the cart and to the residents' rooms to deliver the trays. The CDM proceeded to test the food on the test tray using the facility's food thermometer. The temperatures were as follows: Egg omelet with cheese 98 degrees Fahrenheit Sausage 90 degrees Fahrenheit Milk 2% 42 degrees Fahrenheit The CDM was informed of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 resident (#2) during review of 1 of 9 complaints related to Resident Rights and 2 (#10, #28) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) Resident #2's medical record was reviewed on 4/28/25 at 10:53 AM. The record revealed a progress note written by Staff #11 the Attending Physician on 2/3/25 at 12:15 PM which included but was not limited to: Patient initially irate, angry that s/he is not allowed to smoke marijuana for pain management at the facility, states I am a long-term advocate for marijuana for pain management and I will sue this place if I become addicted to morphine. Further review of the medical record revealed a nursing progress note written by Staff #9 on 2/7/25 at 5:06 AM. The note included: . resident was cussing, yelling and screaming that his/her marijuana was stolen, I, the nurse then call the supervisor, supervisor and the nurse went into residents' room .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation of resident property for 1 (#2) of 6 residents reviewed for Resident Rights; and failed to conduct a thorough investigation and prevent other potential abuse or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress for 2 (#12 and #15) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) Resident #2's medical record was reviewed on 4/28/25 at 10:53 AM. The record revealed a progress note written by Staff #11 the Attending Physician on 2/3/25 at 12:15 PM which included but was not limited to: Patient initially irate, angry that s/he is not allowed to smoke marijuana for pain management at the facility, states I am a long-term advocate for marijuana for pain management and I will sue this place if I become addicted to morphine. Further review of the medical record revealed a nursing progress note written by Staff #9 on 2/7/25 at 5:06 AM. The note included: .resident was cussing, yelling and screaming that his/her marijuana was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with resident rights. This was evident for 2 (#12 and #18) of 16 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. The findings include: 1) Review of a complaint on 4/21/25 at 9:22 AM revealed an allegation that the facility was not assisting Resident #12 to get to medical appointments outside of the facility. Resident #12s medical record revealed A Social Services Progress note dated 8/29/23 which indicated that a Dentist from Health Drive examined Resident #12 and recommended antibiotics and to have his/her 17th and 18th tooth extracted. The resident refused the antibiotic and refused to be transferred out. When Social Workers encourage him/her to be evaluated by an oral surgeon as recommended, he/she became very hostile and stated s/he wanted to be transferred to the University of Maryland Geriatric ER (Emergency Room). When informed that EMS would likely transport him/her to the nearest ER s/he became…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide an activities program to meet the needs and preferences of the residents and failed to develop a resident centered care plan related to activities with achievable goals and measurable objectives. This was evident for 1 (#11) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of life. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 4/18/25 at 2:52 PM, a review of complaint, MD00199947 alleged that activities were not provided for Resident #11. During the survey, intermittent observations of Resident #11 were made at various times on different days. During the observations, Resident 11 was found either in his/her room, or ambulating in the hallway. Resident #11 was never observed in engaged in an activity or having a one-to-one activity with facility staff. A review of the medical record on 4/24/24 at 4:10 PM, revealed Resident #11 resided in the facility for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and interviews, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for a resident. This was evident for 1 (#18) of 1 residents reviewed for physician services during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 4/22/25 at 1:09 PM, a review of complaint MD00212978 alleged that the same ointment had been prescribed for a rash on Resident #18's shins (the front part of the leg between the knee and the ankle) 2 times and then the rheumatologist prescribed the same ointment for the rash. The complainant alleged that the resident still had the rash on 12/18/24, and there were no current treatments for the rash at that time. On 4/25/25 at 11:24 AM, a review of Resident #18's electronic medical record (EMR) was conducted. The medical record documented Resident #18 resided in the facility for long term care since June 2022, and had diagnoses which included dementia, hypertension (high blood pressure), and hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid). Further review of Resident #18's EMR, revealed documentation that since July 2024, Resident #18 had a recurrent rash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to implement appropriate individualized interventions for residents identified at risk of developing pressure ulcers. This was evident for 1 (#14) of 16 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. The findings include: Resident #14's medical record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 11:42 AM. The Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission nursing progress note dated 12/8/23 3:45 PM revealed Resident #14's skin was warm and dry with redness to groin and redness to buttock. The progress note did not include the character of the redness such as size, or if the areas were blanchable. admission Physician orders written on 12/8/23 included but were not limited to: Daily skin check, weekly skin check by Licensed Nurse on Tuesday, Braden Scale weekly x 4 start day of admission, Hydraguard (a moisture barrier cream) to buttocks redness every shift. A Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk is a tool used to assess a patient's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a psychotropic medication prescribed as needed was limited to 14 days. This was evident for 1 (#11) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of life during a complaint survey. The findings include: As needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. If the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. On 4/21/25 at 2:00 PM, a review of complaint MD00213514 alleged concerns with the care Resident #11 received at the facility. On 4/25/25 at 3:00 PM, a review of Resident #11's medical record was conducted. Review of Resident #11's March 2025 Medication Administration record (MAR) revealed a 2/26/25 physician order for Lorazepam (Ativan) (anti-anxiety medication), administer 1 tablet by mouth one time a day PRN (as needed) 30 minutes prior to blood draw for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that all medications were stored in a locked compartment that was temperature controlled. This was evident for 1 (26) of 30 residents reviewed for complaints. The findings include: An observation on 4/23/25 at 11:50 AM of Resident (R)26's room revealed the resident had the following medications sitting out in the open on his/her over-the-bed table: 1 can of medicated spray, a container of Desitin (diaper rash cream), Pepto Bismol ultra, Liquid [NAME] pectate, severe congestion liquid medication, cough syrup. During this observation R26 was interviewed. The resident reported that s/he had these medications at his/her bedside because facility staff refused to get them for him/her. The resident reported that a family member purchased the medications and brought them to him/her. An observation on 4/29/25 at 11:15 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the resident had medications stored on his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review on record review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct and document an accurate and comprehensive facility-wide assessment. This was evident during a complaint survey and had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The findings include: The intent of the facility assessment is for the facility to evaluate its resident population and identify the resources needed to provide the necessary care and services during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment must be reviewed as necessary and at least annually. Competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics in performing that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. On 5/1/25, during an extended survey, a copy of the Facility Assessment was requested, and a binder with the facility assessment was provided. In front of the binder was a Facility Administrative Review Sheet that documented The contents of this policy manual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed: 1) to have a process to prepare and update an inventory of all property that the resident brought to the nursing facility. Including whether the resident retained possession of each item or entrusted the item to the facility for safekeeping, and identification of items valued at $100 or more and, 2) to have accurate and complete documentation regarding resident's end of life choices. This was evident for 1 (#2) of 9 residents reviewed for Resident Rights and evident for 1 (#11) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of life during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #2's medical record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:53 AM during review of a complaint alleging that Resident #2 was not permitted to utilize his/her motorized wheelchair while residing in the facility. No inventory of personal items was found in the record. Further review of the record revealed a nursing progress note dated [DATE] 5:06 AM by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a closed medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement abuse prevention polices as evidenced by staff's failure to, 1) immediately notify the facility administrator of an allegation of resident abuse, sexual abuse, and misappropriation of resident property, 2) immediately initiate an investigation into the allegations of resident abuse, and 3) report the allegations of resident abuse to the State Regulatory Agency (Office of Health Care Quality). This was evident for 2 (Resident #1, #3) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Abuse, is defined at §483.5 as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a closed medical record and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to initiate an investigation into a reported allegation of abuse. This was evident for 2 (Resident #1, #3) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Abuse, is defined at §483.5 as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Sexual abuse, is defined at §483.5 as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00205968 on 05/28/24 revealed an allegation that, on 05/18/24, Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room under emergency petition due to being witnessed for the second time in a 10-day period fondling the same female resident (hands down the resident's diaper) who is bed bound and demented. Resident #1 was evaluated in the emergency room and cleared for discharge back to the nursing facility on 05/19/24. The facility refused to have Resident #1 return from the hospital on [DATE]. In an interview with the facility administrator and director of nurses (DON) on 05/28/24 at 10:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate the process to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00205968 on 05/28/24 revealed an allegation that, on 05/18/24, Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room under emergency petition due to being witnessed for the second time in a 10-day period fondling the same female resident (hands down the resident's diaper) who is bed bound and demented. Resident #1 was evaluated in the emergency room and cleared for discharge back to the nursing facility on 05/19/24. The facility refused to have Resident #1 return from the hospital on [DATE]. In an interview with the facility administrator and director of nurses (DON) on 05/28/24 at 10:30 am, the DON stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00205968 on 05/28/24 revealed an allegation that, on 05/18/24, Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room under emergency petition due to being witnessed for the second time in a 10-day period fondling the same female resident (hands down the resident's diaper) who is bed bound and demented. Resident #1 was evaluated in the emergency room and cleared for discharge back to the nursing facility on 05/19/24. The facility refused to have Resident #1 return from the hospital on [DATE]. A review of Resident 1's closed medical record on 05/28/24 revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 03/06/24, the facility social worker initiated a care plan the indicated Resident #1 is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to send a copy of the facility bed hold policy with a resident when the resident was sent to the emergency room. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00205968 on 05/28/24 revealed an allegation that, on 05/18/24, Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room under emergency petition due to being witnessed for the second time in a 10-day period fondling the same female resident (hands down the resident's diaper) who is bed bound and demented. Resident #1 was evaluated in the emergency room and cleared for discharge back to the nursing facility on 05/19/24. The facility refused to allow Resident #1 to return to the facility after being evaluated and cleared in the hospital on [DATE]. In an interview with the facility administrator and director of nurses (DON) on 05/28/24 at 10:30 am, during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after a brief hospitalization. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00205968 on 05/28/24 revealed an allegation that, on 05/18/24, Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room under emergency petition due to being witnessed for the second time in a 10-day period fondling the same female resident (hands down the resident's diaper) who is bed bound and demented. Resident #1 was evaluated in the emergency room and cleared for discharge back to the nursing facility on 05/19/24. The facility refused to have Resident #1 return from the hospital on [DATE]. In an interview with the facility administrator and director of nurses (DON) on 05/28/24 at 10:30 am, the DON stated that the facility did not accept the resident back from the hospital for the safety of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observations during tour of the facility and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Resident #10's and #100's urinary bag were covered from view from people walking past his/her room. This occurred in 2 of 53 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #10 and #100 urinary bag was covered. A urinary catheter is a medical device that bypasses the urethra and drains urine directly from the bladder. It drains into an attached urinary bag made with transparent plastic to allow staff to assess and measure the urine it contains. However, in consideration of a homelike environment, it is appropriate to cover the clear part of the bag with a cloth cover to prevent the resident from feeling exposed and to prevent other residents from feeling discomfort at being able to see another resident's urine. 1) During an observation that took place on 7/18/22 at 9 AM, Resident #100 was found asleep in his/her bed. The resident's urinary bag was found lying directly on the floor and uncovered. The urinary bag and its contents were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to keep the resident's environment clean and in good repair. This was evident on 5 of 5 nursing units and impacted 9 of 58 residents (Resident # 115, #30, # 107, # 29, #4, #22, #73, #56, #376) reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. The following environmental concerns were observed during observation and follow-up rounds during the annual survey: During an observation of the facility on 7/18/22 at 9 AM the following was observed: 1a. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Smelled of a strong urine odor; large sticky spots were noted throughout the room floor; dirty towels were noted lying on the floor. 1b. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The trashcan was overflowing with isolation gowns and materials. 1c. Station #3 Hallway: The sink located in the hallway for handwashing was cracked and wet at the bottom with the partial board exposed. 1d. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The footrest was broken from 1 of 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the state agency in the required allotted time frame after being made aware of an allegation of neglect. This was evident in 1 of 10 residents (Resident #326) sampled for neglect/abuse during the annual survey. The finding includes: It is the requirement that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours to the state agency after the allegation is made. On 07/29/22 at 10:24 AM, a review of the facility's investigation of allegation of neglect related to Resident #326 revealed the facility failed to notify the state agency until three days after the facility was made aware of the allegation. The alleged incident occurred on 11/08/21 and was reported to the state agency on 11/11/21. On 07/29/22 at 10:38 AM, a review of the facility's investigation concerning the alleged incident revealed a Suspension Pending Investigation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to transmit a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 7 days after the assessment was completed. This was evident in 1 in 6 (Resident #1) resident charts reviewed during the survey for completed MDS assessments. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a tool for implementing standardized assessment and for facilitating care management in nursing homes. The assessment is completed upon admission, annually, quarterly, during a significant change, and when a resident is discharged . On 07/26/22 at 3:05 PM, a review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the last MDS assessment was completed on 03/02/22. The most recent MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in process but was completed on 06/06/22 and was not transmitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The MDS assessment should have been submitted by 06/02/22. MDS Coordinator #3 was made aware of the concern. On 07/26/22 at 3:38 PM during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to follow the resident care plan when providing care. This was found to be evident for 1 of 10 (Resident # 3) intakes reviewed for abuse during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: MD00176724 was reviewed on 7/29/22 at 10:00 AM in which Resident # 3 reported allegations of verbal abuse and threatening gestures by a staff member and abuse was unsubstantiated. Review of the resident medical record on the same date at 11:00 AM revealed the resident had a care plan in place for behavior problems related to Schizophrenia, Depression, Anxiety and Unspecified intellectual Disabilities, that was initiated on 3/3/2020. One of the approaches listed was that two staff members were to assist with care due to behaviors of false accusations by the resident. An interview was conducted with the DON on 7/29/22 at 2:00 PM and she was asked if there was a second staff present while the GNA was with the resident while providing care and the DON stated, no. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and record reviews and interviews with the facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) update a care plan for a resident who refuses care (Resident #115) and 2.) update a care plan after a change in status (Resident #10). This was found to be evident for 2 of 59 residents observed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: 1. Resident #115 was admitted to the facility with the following but not limited diagnosis: Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance and Mood Disorder. On 7/18/22 while making resident observations at 1:15 PM, Resident #115 was observed with a large amount of facial hair and a full beard. Subsequent observations were made on 7/19/22 at 1:59 PM, and on 7/20/22 at 1:30 PM, and the resident was observed to continue to have a large amount of facial hair and a full beard and the resident was not shaved or groomed. A review of Resident #115's medical record on 7/18/22 at 2:15 PM revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), a tool used to measure a resident cognition that assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) keep a resident with cognitive impairment from having access to sharp objects that were in the resident room (Resident #226); 2.) ensure that a resident's environment was reasonably free of hazards (Resident #73). This was found to be evident for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: 1. MD00176424 was reviewed on 7/22/22 at 11:23 AM for concerns regarding resident safety. According to the facility incident/accident investigation sheet that was included in the facility's investigation, on 2/8/2020 Resident #226 was chewing on a razor and attempted to attack. Resident was also noted with a sharp plastic piece. Further review of Resident #226's medical record on the same date at 1:30 PM revealed the resident had the following but not limited diagnosis: Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Major Depressive Disorder, and Bipolar Disorder and Poor Impulse Control. Review of the resident care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that accurate records were maintained for Resident #50. This was found to be evident while investigating a facility-reported incident (MD00157390) during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: MD00157390 was reviewed on 7/26/22 at 10:40 AM for concerns regarding Resident #50 safety and a fall. Resident #50 has the following but not limited to diagnosis: Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Unspecified Psychosis, and anxiety disorder. On 7/26/22 at 11:00 AM a review of the facility investigation revealed that on 8/17/20 at 6:45 AM Resident #50 was observed lying on the floor in their room. The resident was ambulatory before the fall. An x-ray was done with the following result: Acute overlapping intertrochanteric of the right femur. Further review of the resident's care plan dated 1/16/19 revealed that the resident was at risk for falls/injuries related to osteoporosis (a disease that weakens the bones), poor safety awareness, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews it has been determined that the facility failed to: 1.) follow infection control practices to prevent the spread of COVID-19 as evidenced by facility staff failing to have the needed Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) available in the supply carts in front of the rooms and 2.) ensure the zippered door closure to the COVID 19 Unit was secured to the wall and without compromise in material as evidenced by a large hole in the plastic on the left lower side. This deficient practice was found on 1 of 4 observations of the COVID-19 Unit; 3) ensure that Resident #10 and #100 urinary bags remained off the floor and away from sources of infectious microorganisms. This occurred in two of six residents reviewed for Foley Catheters. The findings: 1. On 07/18/22 at 09:44 AM, an observation outside the COVID-19 Unit revealed a plastic, zipped divider separating the COVID-19 Unit and the elevator. The zippered door closure to the COVID-19 Unit was not secured to the wall and a large hole was noted in the plastic on the left lower side. Further observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to have bedrooms that measure 80 square feet per resident. This was evident in 4 residents' rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 5, 6, 9) observed during the survey. The findings include: On 7/21/22 at 8:30 AM, the Administrator stated that the facility had a waiver related to room sizes and that no modification had been made to the rooms. On 2/20/20 the following observations/measurements were taken: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] was measured to be 285 square feet, for four residents' beds which indicates 71.25 square ft of space per bed/resident. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] was measured to be 222 ft for three residents' beds which indicates 74 square feet per bed/resident. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 217 square ft for three residents' beds which indicates 72.33 square feet per bed/resident. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] measure 218 square ft for 3 resident beds which indicates 72.66 square feet per bed.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents located on Station 1's second and third floors. This has the potential to affect all the residents who reside on Station #1. The findings include: On 07/18/ 22 at 11:15 AM, observations on Station 1 revealed trim missing in the bathroom used by the residents on the second floor. There was no room number and resident name label outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The pay phone on the second-floor dining room had a broken and taped receiver and the phone did not work. On 07/26/22 at 11:50 AM during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #23 revealed that if the staff have a maintenance problem, they put the problem into the TELS logbook and/or call maintenance at extension 7827. Maintenance comes to the unit many times during the shift to check the maintenance logbook. On 07/26/22 at 12:02 PM, while walking through the 3rd floor of Station 1 with Maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-02 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative record review and staff interview, the facility failed ensure that Staff #20 received required yearly abuse, neglect, and exploitation training. This was evident in 1 of 35 employees reviewed during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: On 3/19/2022, the Office of Health Care Quality received a self-report of witnessed abuse MD00176543. The facility reported that the abuse incident took place on 3/16/2022 involving Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA)#20 being physically and verbally aggressive toward Resident #56. Witness #21 witnessed the abuse incident and provided video footage of the event. The facility investigation substantiated that GNA #20 abused Resident #56. GNA #20 was suspended from working in the facility on 3/17/2022 and terminated from the facility on 3/18/2022. On 7/26/22 at 7:10 AM, review of the facility investigation revealed the reported abuse incident dated 3/16/2022. The investigation packet contained GNA #20's training transcript for the time he/she worked in the facility. The training transcript revealed that GNA #20 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation throughout the annual recertification survey, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Issues were identified on all resident units. The findings include: On 2/18/20 at 12:15 PM, Resident #128's bed sheet was observed to have an approximately 2 foot tattered edge on the side of the bed facing the window. Observation of the rest of Resident #128's room (49) revealed that the wall was in disrepair to the left of the door frame, resulting in approximately 1.5 ft x 1 inch of exposed drywall. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom was observed with rusted, exposed toilet bowl floor bolts. On 2/19/20 at 9:29 AM, observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed an L-shaped scrape on the wall beside the resident's bed measuring approximately 4 x 3 inches. Both windows in room [ROOM NUMBER] were observed with dust and dirt on the window locks and frame. A 10:19 AM observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 2/19/2020, revealed a cabinet in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to properly store medications. This was observed twice on the station 3 nursing unit during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) During an observation of station 3 nurses' station, on 02/18/20 at 2:01 PM, the surveyor observed an opaque gray plastic bag hanging from a shelf just above the station 3 printer. The opaque gray plastic bag was sealed but was available to anyone, staff, visitor or resident, entering the station 3 nurses' station. There were no staff members in the station 3 nurses' station at the time of this observation. Upon returning to the station 3 nurses' station, the unit charge nurse was asked what the contents of the bag were. The unit 3 charge nurse indicated the opaque gray plastic bag contained resident discontinued medications awaiting to be picked up and returned to the pharmacy. Examining the contents revealed medications from 5 different residents. None of the medications were of a schedule II nature. The charge nurse removed and secured the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of the main kitchen and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 2/18/20 at 9:37 AM, a tour of the facility's main kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Manager (Staff #7). A leaking pipe under the dishwasher room sink was observed. Further observation revealed peeling paint on the walls of the prep room and soiled/dusty vents throughout the kitchen. Observation of Station 1's dining room during lunch service on 2/18/20 at 12:15 PM revealed Staff #12 using bare hands when handling and buttering bread for Residents #17 and #9. On 2/21/20 at 8:00 AM, another tour of the facility's main kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Manager. Paper towels were missing from the dispenser above the hand washing sink adjacent to the prep line and instead a roll of paper towels that had to be manually torn off were placed on a cart beside the hand washing sink. Interview with the Dietary Manager revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen and resident equipment in safe operating condition. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: During a tour of the main kitchen with the Dietary Manager, on 2/18/20 at 9:37 AM, a leaking pipe beneath the sink in the dishwasher room was observed. Further observation of the sink on 2/20/20 at 8:00 AM confirmed the presence of the leak. On 2/21/20 at 8:16 AM, a wheelchair was observed outside room [ROOM NUMBER] with tears and disrepair to the blue seat pad. These concerns were discussed with the Director of Nursing and Administrator during the exit conference on 2/27/20.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure the dignity of residents who required assistance with eating during the dining experience. This was evident for 1 (#72) of 11 residents in the dining room. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. An observation of Resident #72 in the Station 1 dining room on 2/18/20 at 12:13 PM, revealed the resident was sitting at a table with two other residents. The Unit Manager (UM) #16 and Geriatric Nursing Assistant #12 served the other two residents at Resident #72's table and they began to eat. Resident #72 sat there with no food or drink until 12:29 PM. The UM #16 brought the resident's tray over and sat it down on the table, however, when Resident #192, who was sitting at the same table, stood up to walk down the hall, UM #16 accompanied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and interview with staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that resident's call bells were within reach. This was evident for 2 (#18 and #42) of 32 residents observed during initial resident sample observations. The findings include: 1) Resident #18 was observed on 2/19/20 at 10:43 AM lying in bed. A wheelchair was located approximately 3 feet away from the bed to the resident's left. The call bell activation button was draped over the wheelchair armrest and was not within resident #18's reach. At 10:50 AM on 2/19/20, Staff #13, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered the resident's room. She was asked how Resident #18 would summon staff for assistance. She indicated that the call bell button should have been on Resident #18's bed clipped to his/her bed sheet and indicated Resident #18 was able to use the call bell but doesn't like to. 2) Resident #42 was observed on 2/19/20 at 12:06 PM. The resident, who is blind, was sitting in a chair with an overbed table in front of him/her eating lunch. The chair was located against the wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge MDS assessment timely. This was evident for 1 (#1) of 1 resident reviewed for Resident Assessment. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. The findings include: Resident #1's record was reviewed on 2/26/20 at 12:51 PM. The Resident was discharged from the facility on 11/26/19. The record revealed that Resident #1's Discharge MDS was completed, signed by Staff #19 and transmitted on 2/18/20. Staff #19 (the MDS coordinator) was interviewed on 2/26/20 at 1:12 PM. She was asked to verify when Resident #1 was discharged . She indicated it's right here you're able to see it aren't you? She was then asked when the discharge MDS assessments are due. She indicated in a timely fashion and we try to get them done and sent as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determine that facility staff failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed accurately for a resident to ensure that the resident received appropriate services while in a long term care setting. This was evident for 1 (41) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of the PASRR. The findings include: A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review is completed to ensure that each resident in a nursing facility is screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission and that individuals identified with MD or ID are evaluated and receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. A record review for Resident #41 conducted on 2/20/20 at 11:23 AM, revealed the Discharge summary dated [DATE], [from the acute care hospital] that documented Resident #41 was brought in (to acute care hospital) by a family member because the resident had been refusing medication, hallucinating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff, it was determine the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident by failing to follow a plan of care for activities and failing to develop a Hospice plan of care. This was evident for 1 (#42) of 4 residents reviewed for Activities and 1 (#108) of 1 residents reviewed for Hospice. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The findings include: 1) Resident #42 was observed on 2/18/20 before and after lunch lying on his/her bed, and on 2/19/20 at 12:02 PM, eating lunch in his/her room. He/She was observed again lying on his/her bed on 2/19/20 at 1:14 PM, and on 2/21/20 at 1:54 PM while a nail painting, hand massage and movie activity were starting in the dining room, and again on 2/24/20 at 2:30 PM. Resident #42's medical record was reviewed on 2/25/20 at 9:42 AM. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, visual loss, both eyes, glaucoma,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise resident care plans. This was evident for 1 (#42) of 4 residents reviewed for Activities and 2 (#128 and #50) of 17 resident's reviewed for Accidents. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The findings include: 1) A. Resident #42 was observed on 2/18/20 before and after lunch lying on his/her bed, and on 2/19/20 at 12:02 PM, eating lunch in his/her room. He/She was observed again lying on his/her bed on 2/19 at 1:14 PM, on 2/21/20 at 1:54 PM, while a nail painting, hand massage and movie activity were starting in the dining room, and again on 2/24/20 at 2:30 PM. Resident #42's medical record was reviewed on 2/25/20 at 9:42 AM. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, visual loss, both eyes, glaucoma, anxiety and dementia. A plan of care (POC) was developed for activities. It indicated that the resident is a loner who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records by failing to document group activities offered and the resident's acceptance or refusal to attend. This was evident for 1 (#42) of 4 residents reviewed for Activities. The findings include: Resident #42 was observed on 2/18/20 before and after lunch lying on his/her bed, and on 2/19/20 at 12:02 PM eating lunch in his/her room. He/She was observed again lying on his/her bed on 2/19 at 1:14 PM, on 2/21/20 at 1:54 PM, while a nail painting, hand massage and movie activity were starting in the dining room, and again on 2/24/20 at 2:30 PM. Resident #42's medical record was reviewed on 2/25/20 at 9:42 AM. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, visual loss, both eyes, glaucoma, anxiety and dementia. A plan of care was developed for activities. It indicated that the resident was a loner who prefers to stay in his/her room. The resident's goal included: [Resident #42] would participate actively in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-09-15 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the current nurse staffing assignments and ratios for each shift was posted daily in a clear and visible place on each nursing unit. This deficient practice was evident on 7 of 8 survey days on Unit Station 2B and 6 of 8 survey days on Units 2A, 4, and 2B during the recertification survey.The findings include: 1. On 09/04/25 at 8:27 AM, during the initial tour, Station 2B surveyor observed no current nurse staffing assignments and ratios posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents, staff, and visitors. Surveyor did observe various poster boards tucked in the Nurse station area. On 09/11/2025 at 11:45 AM during interviews with GNA Staff #28 and GNA staff 29, Surveyor regarding no poster boards and no posted nurse staffing assignments observed on the unit, the Surveyor was informed that poster boards were down due to painting. Surveyor asked how staff, residents and visitors made aware of staff assignments and GNA Staff #28 stated staffing sheets are located at the nurse's station…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-09-15 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have the most recent survey results posted and accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. This had the potential to affect all residents and visitors within the facility. The findings include:On 9/10/2025 at 7:25AM, the Surveyor observed the facility's Survey Binder on a console table in the reception area next to the Receptionist desk.On 9/10/2025 at 11:26AM, a review of the Survey Binder failed to reveal the results of the most recent complaint survey conducted on 4/21/2025-4/25/2025 and 4/28/2025-5/1/2025, as well as the on-site revisit survey conducted on 7/31/2025, 8/1/2025, and 8/4/2025. The Survey Binder contained survey results from a complaint survey 5/30/2024 and an annual survey 8/2/2022.During an interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/11/2025 at 3:10PM, the Surveyor and the DON confirmed that the most recent survey results were not in the Survey Binder. The Surveyor was informed that the DON was not aware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to have bedrooms that measured 80 square feet per resident. This was evident for 4 resident rooms observed during the survey. The findings include: On 2/20/20, room [ROOM NUMBER] was measured to be 285 square feet (ft2) for four resident beds which is 71.25 ft2 per bed. room [ROOM NUMBER] was measured to be 222 ft2 three resident beds which is 74 ft2 per bed. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 217 ft2 for three resident beds which is 72.33 ft2 per bed. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 218 ft2 for 3 resident beds which is 72.66 ft2 per bed. Interview with the Administrator on 2/20/20 at 9:23 AM confirmed the facility had waivers for these rooms. The findings and need to submit a waiver request were discussed with the Director of Nursing and Administrator during the exit conference on 2/27/20.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$273,754 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $120,068 — penalty dated 2025-05-01
  • $153,686 — penalty dated 2024-05-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.4-2.4 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir at MemorialDenison, TX 1 of 5Bennettsville Health And Rehabilitation CenterBennettsville, SC 1 of 5Calhoun Convalescent CenterSaint Matthews, SC 1 of 5Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the ParkwayCorinth, TX 1 of 5Julia Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Lake Emory Post Acute CareInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenwoodGreenwood, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - InmanInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - Rock HillRock Hill, SC 1 of 5Northampton Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenteFrederick, MD 1 of 5Oakbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterSummerville, SC 1 of 5Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOakland, MD 1 of 5Physical Rehabilitation And Wellness Center Of SpaSpartanburg, SC 1 of 5Riverside Health and RehabCharleston, SC 1 of 5San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care CenterRound Rock, TX 1 of 5Springdale Healthcare CenterCamden, SC 2 of 5Berlin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBerlin, MD 2 of 5Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBremond, TX 2 of 5Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCrownsville, MD 2 of 5Faith Healthcare CenterFlorence, SC 2 of 5Falcon Ridge RehabilitationHutto, TX 2 of 5Hillside Heights Rehabilitation SuitesAmarillo, TX 2 of 5Horizon Health And Rehabilitation CenterLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Lancaster Health and RehabilitationLancaster, SC 2 of 5Las Ventanas De SocorroSocorro, TX 2 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenvilleGreenville, SC 2 of 5Midlands Health & Rehabilitation CenterColumbia, SC 2 of 5Mira Vista CourtFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Moran Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWesternport, MD 2 of 5North Las Vegas Care CenterNorth las Vegas, NV 2 of 5Pavilion at Glacier ValleySlinger, WI 2 of 5Sandy Lake Rehabilitation And Care CenterCoppell, TX 2 of 5Southpointe Healthcare and RehabilitationGreenville, SC 2 of 5Spanish Hills Wellness SuitesLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Terra Bella Health and Wellness SuitesHouston, TX 2 of 5The Pavilion At CreekwoodMansfield, TX 2 of 5Villa Rosa Nursing And Rehabilitation, LLCMitchellville, MD 3 of 5Bridgecrest Rehabilitation SuitesHouston, TX 3 of 5Crimson Heights Health & WellnessHumble, TX 3 of 5Devlin Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCumberland, MD

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MARYLAND LONG TERM CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/18/2016
COKER-LAWAL, MINIRUTUIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$657K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 1%Other / private 7%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $657K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,790per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$306per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215252. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next