Midlands Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 83.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 and R2 was free from electrical hazards. On 04/08/24 at 4:00 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing were notified that the failure to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operation constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F908. On 04/08/24 at 4:00 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 12/15/23. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.90 - Physical Environment. On 04/08/24 at 6:18 PM, the facility presented an acceptable plan of removal of the IJ. On 04/08/24 at 6:18 PM, the survey team, validated the facility's corrective actions and removed the IJ. The facility remained out of compliance at F908 at a lower scope and severity of D following removal of the IJ. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Maintenance/Housekeeping Policies and Procedures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff thoroughly cleaned and air-dried plates and bowls prior to storage. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect 72 of 86 residents who received dietary servicesFindings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Storage and Cleaning of Dishes and Utensils dated 07/21/23 revealed, Proper ware-washing and storage is also important in food safety . Inspect clean dishes for debris and send back through the dish machine as needed . Clean dishes, silverware, pots, pans, and utensils are stored in a clean dry area at least 6 [sic] [inches] off the floor. These items should be air dried before storing or they should be stored in a way that will allow them to air dry. Do not use a towel to dry dishes .During an observation and interview on 09/10/25 at 12:00 PM, the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed 10 four-ounce (oz) bowls, which had been stacked on the food service line for use during lunch service, and 20 plates that were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC) recommendations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that 4 residents (Resident (R)6, R16, R25, and R46) out of 5 reviewed, were offered the COVID-19 vaccine booster out of a total sample of 26 residents. This failure had the potential for the residents and/or their responsible party of not being informed to make a decision if they wanted the vaccine and a potential risk of contracting COVID-19.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Procedures Subject: Immunization recommendations for patients/residents and health care workers revised 05/15/23 indicated .The facility will track all staff and resident vaccination status for the COVID-19 vaccine. Resident vaccination status will be documented in their medical record and include: 1) Education provided to the resident or resident representative regarding the benefits and potential risks…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the Ombudsman was notified of 2 residents (Resident (R)56 and R93) discharge to an acute care hospital out of a sample of 26 residents. This failure increased the risk for inappropriate transfer or discharge and increased the risk for the resident having access to an advocate who could inform them of their options and rights.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy and procedures titled, Admission, Discharge and Transfer - Code of Ethics revised on 10/23/19 indicated . The written notice of transfer or discharge includes: . The name, address, and telephone number of the State Ombudsman . The policy did not include Ombudsman notification of the transfer/discharge.Review of R56's Face Sheet in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of R56's Notice of Transfer or discharge date d 07/31/25, provided by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflected the medication status for 1 resident (Resident (R)7) in a sample of 26 residents. This had the potential to lead to inaccurate reimbursements and unmet care needs for the resident.Findings include:Review of R7's undated Face Sheet located in R7's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab revealed R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but was not limited to cerebral infarction (stroke).Review of R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/16/25, documented that R7 was receiving an anticoagulant (a medication that prevents or reduces blood clotting (coagulation).Review of R7s Physician Order located in the EMR under the Orders tab revealed R7 was taking Clopidogrel (Plavix) which is classified as an antiplatelet (medication that prevents platelets from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to clean respiratory equipment for 3 of 4 residents (Resident (R)6, R87, and R68) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 26 residents. The failure to maintain a clean oxygen concentrator filter had the potential to increase the risk of infections for the residents.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Equipment Rounds General dated 02/12/24 revealed, Policy: The facility shall identify a process to facilitate general equipment rounds. Purpose: . To perform routine preventive maintenance and track due dates for scheduled, comprehensive preventive maintenance . veinlet filters on oxygen concentrators shall be visually inspected and cleaned/replaced as necessary.Review of R6's undated Face Sheet located in R6's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but was not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 4 medication carts were properly secured. This had the potential for the medications to be accessed by staff, residents, or visitors with the potential for adverse effects.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Pharmacy Services Policies and Procedures: Medication Storage revised on 04/01/22 revealed, Policy: 1. Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely . in accordance with State and Federal laws, the facility will store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments . 2. The medication . is only accessible to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel or authorized staff members.During an observation and interview on 09/10/25 at 4:05 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 was preparing medications to administer to a resident. Resident (R)46 was at the medication cart and asked LPN1 if she would take her blood glucose (accucheck). LPN1 said she would as soon as she was finished with the resident's medications. R46 said she would just wait by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure glucometers (machines to check blood glucose levels) were disinfected after use for 2 (Residents (R)96 and R46) out of 2 observed during glucose monitoring out of a total sample of 26 residents. This had the potential to cause the spread of infection.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Procedures revised on 05/15/23 indicated, under the Policy section, Equipment will be maintained and kept sanitized or disinfected in accord with acceptable policies.During an observation and interview on 09/10/25 at 4:06 PM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 took a glucometer in R96's room to obtain his blood glucose level (Accu-Chek). After LPN1 completed the Accu-Chek, she put the glucometer device in the top right drawer of the med cart without sanitizing it. At 4:23 PM LPN1 was observed to complete an Accu-Chek on R46. After LPN1 completed the Accu-Chek, she put the glucometer device on the top of the med cart without it being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the facility policy, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed and not stored with other medications in use for residents in 3 of 4 med carts and 2 of 2 medication rooms. The facility further failed to ensure medications that were discontinued, or the medications for discharged residents were not stored in a med room on the North Hall. The facility additionally failed to ensure personal snacks were not stored on the North Hall front med cart. Review of the facility policy titled, Section 5 - Medication Disposal and Returns, states under procedures: 1. When medication is discontinued or a resident is discharged , facility staff should refer to the LTC Provider Pharmacy policies regarding medication return eligibility and the process to be followed for returns. 2. Nursing staff shall dispose of any medication that has been discontinued, expired or that is not returnable to the pharmacy according to Facility Policy. 3. Facility should segregate and securely store the medications to be returned to pharmacy until they are picked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility policy, records reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)41 and her responsible party received notice of transfer, for a hospital stay, in writing and in a language they could understand of the reason for transfer for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. Review on 08/26/24 at 03:10 PM of the facility policy titled, Admission, Discharge and Transfer, states: 4. Facility staff provides, upon admission, at the time of transfer to a hospital, and before therapeutic leave begins, written information to the patient/resident and a family member or representative concerning the duration of the bed-hold policy under the state plan and under alternative payor plans. Facility staff documents in the medical record that written notice was provided. 21. The patient/resident/family member receives notice of transfer or discharge, as soon as practical depending on the reason for the discharge, in a language they can understand. A. Safety or health of the patient/resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)41) or her responsible party received a copy of the Bed Hold Policy, in a timely manner, for a discharge to the hospital from [DATE] through 07/31/24. Review of the facility policy titled, Facility's Policy and State Requirements for Temporary Leave Bed-Hold, states, If a resident leaves the facility for temporary hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the resident or his/her representative may ask the facility to hold the resident's bed until the resident is ready to return. The resident and/or his/her representative will be given an copy of the facility's bed-hold policy before the resident actually leaves for his/her temporary leave or hospitalization. In the case of an emergency, hospitalization, the bed hold policy may accompany the resident to the hospital or will be given to the resident or his/her legal representative within twenty-four (24) hours of the resident's hospitalization. The findings include:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$51,803 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $35,913 — penalty dated 2024-08-28
• $15,890 — penalty dated 2024-04-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $547K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC