No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Horizon Health And Rehabilitation Center

660 Martin Luther King Blvd, Las Vegas, NV 89106 · For profit - Corporation · 138 certified beds · (702) 382-5580 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (702) 382-5580 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
80 South Martin Luther King Blvd., Suite 100 · (725) 234-3383 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1402 D St · (702) 582-5318 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(702) 515-5408 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.8%12.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.5%5.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%2.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.7%13.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.1%22.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%89.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.8%15.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.4%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.8%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.5%80.7%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.401.851.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.481.451.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.9%CMS range 8.4–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
1.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
29.8%
Total nursing turnover
38.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 124.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-13)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medication was ordered timely, available, and administered, which resulted in a four-day delay in medication administration for 1 of 43 sampled residents (Resident 129). The deficient practice had the potential to result in interruption of prescribed medication therapy and adverse clinical outcomes related to delayed medication administration. Findings include:Resident 129 (R129) was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of prostate, acute kidney failure, and secondary malignant neoplasm of bone. R129 expired on [DATE].A physician order dated [DATE], documented Erleada (a medication used for prostate cancer treatment) 60 milligrams (mg), give 4 tablets once a day.A nursing progress note dated [DATE], documented the cancer center was contacted to refill the medication and delivery was expected on [DATE]. R129's medical record review revealed the medication was placed on hold from [DATE] through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain proper food storage practices in the dry storage area, and temperature control in the refrigerators. The deficient practice had the potential to compromise food safety and increase the risk of foodborne illness among residents. Findings include: On 06/10/2025 at 8:40 AM, a kitchen inspection was conducted alongside a cook, during which the following deficiencies were identified: - A refrigerator used for storing tray line salads, ham, salami, shredded and sliced cheese displayed a temperature of 42°F on its thermometer screen. However, an internal check showed temperatures ranging between 45-50°F. A bag of shredded cheese registered 50°F, while a packet of salami held at 45°F. The temperature log for June 2025 did not document any readings above 40°F, and the refrigerator lacked an internal thermometer for verification. The Kitchen Manager confirmed the recorded food temperatures. - A second refrigerator in the tray line used for storing beverages, including dairy products, displayed a temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility which are significant to the resident for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident 89) and 3 unsampled residents (Residents 29, 32, and 61). The failure to accommodate the residents' preferences and choices had the potential risk to cause psychosocial distress to the residents. Findings include: The facility is located off a major street close to the downtown areas and the parking lot is combined with the neighboring hospital. The facility had a secured covered patio in the back of the facility off the Activity Room. This patio area had a covered area which is complete with misters, lights, plants, and numerous park benches to sit and enjoy the quiet peaceful outdoor air. Resident 89 (R89) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of paraplegia, cellulitis, and a puncture wound with a foreign body. R89 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided information about the right to formulate an advanced directive for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #67). The deficient practice has the potential to deprive the resident of their right to determine their life status. Findings include: Resident #67 (R67) R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diffuse traumatic brain injury, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and unspecified dementia. R67 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three indicating severe cognitive impairment. A resident document titled Resident Face Sheet documented the resident was the responsible party and the daughter, sister, and brother-in-law were the emergency contacts. The facility was not able to provide any advanced directive documents such as: Power of Attorney paperwork, Guardian paperwork, a Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form, or any other Advanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's yelling and disruptive behaviors were addressed for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident 55). The deficient practice deprived other residents of the right to live in a peaceful environment with comfortable noise levels permitting for a restful night's sleep. Findings include: Resident 55 (R55) R55 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including insomnia, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. On 06/10/2025 at 9:45 AM, R55 was overheard from the hallway yelling, help! help! help! A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN1) entered R55's room. Upon leaving R55's room, the LPN indicated R55 yelled all the time. On 06/10/2025 at 9:52 AM, R55 was seated in wheelchair and reported being unhappy in the facility due to not getting along with roommate and expressed was upset over being transported to the main dining room where R55 remained all night accompanied by a nurse. R55 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to review and follow up on a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level 2, following a resident's psychiatric hospitalization for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #57), and failed to ensure referrals for PASRR level 2 screening were completed for 4 of 26 sampled residents (Residents #121, 64, 55, and 67). The deficient practice had the potential to delay necessary specialized services and interventions for the residents, and could have impacted their placement, overall care and well-being.Findings include:A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federally mandated process that ensures individuals with mental disorders or intellectual and developmental disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing facilities for long-term care, and it helps determine the most suitable and least restrictive setting, ensuring access to necessary services and supports. The facility's PASRR documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) reflecting a resident's new mental health conditions and following a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 2 screening determination for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #57). The deficient practice had the potential to compromise the resident's mental health management, leading to inadequate treatment, delayed interventions, and a lack of necessary support services. Findings include: A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federally mandated process that ensures individuals with mental disorders or intellectual and developmental disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing facilities for long-term care, and it helps determine the most suitable and least restrictive setting, ensuring access to necessary services and supports. Resident #57 (R57) R57 was originally admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a new skin impairment was communicated to the wound care team in accordance with facility protocol for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident 118). This deficiency placed the resident at risk for wound complication. Findings include: Resident 118 (R118) R118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia and ingrown nail. On 06/10/2025 at 8:38 AM, R118 laid in bed with feet exposed. A blackened area was observed on the tip of R118's right great toe. R118 explained the podiatrist had tried to remove R118's ingrown nail on 06/03/2025 but had to stop when R118 complained of pain. R118 indicated not knowing what the blackened area on the toe was and had communicated the concern to multiple staff but the resident had not heard back from anyone. A physician's order dated 03/28/2025 documented a consultation with Podiatry. A podiatry consult dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to identify hazards and risks associated with smoking, and residents who smoked were adequately monitored or supervised for 2 of 16 sampled residents (Residents 91 and 99), and 1 unsampled resident (Resident 97), identified as smokers. This deficient practice had the potential to result in fire hazards and compromise the safety and well-being of the residents, staff, and others in the facility.Findings include:A facility policy titled Smoking Regulation, revised 11/01/2017, documented the facility was highly encouraged to maintain a smoke-free environment. If the facility chose not to remain smoke-free, facility leadership was required to establish an appropriate and safe environment for smoking to reduce the risk to residents who smoked, minimize exposure to secondhand smoke for others, and reduce the risk of fire. Smoking without direct supervision was not permitted. Possession of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Foley catheter was assessed timely, the physician was notified of foul-smelling urine, the change in condition was documented, and the urinary drainage bag was changed as ordered for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident 104). This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to urinary tract infection, compromised skin integrity, and overall health status. Findings include: Resident 104 (R104) R104 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including neoplasm of the kidney and obstructive and reflux uropathy. A Physician order dated 08/21/2024, documented to change Foley drainage bag weekly on Sunday. A Physician order dated 10/16/2024, documented an indwelling Foley catheter, 16 French, inflated with 10 cubic centimeters (cc), for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The order indicated the Foley catheter may be changed as needed for obstruction or dislodgement. A Physician order dated 10/16/2024, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding orders administered through the gastrostomy tube were followed as ordered, and total volume delivered was monitored and documented for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident 34). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate nutritional and fluid intake, leading to malnutrition, dehydration, electrolyte imbalances, impaired wound healing and increased susceptibility to infections. Findings include: Resident 34 (R34) R34 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including risk for malnutrition due to impaired food and fluid intake, diabetes mellitus, dementia and gastrostomy. On 06/10/2025 at 10:10 AM, R34 was observed in bed with the head of bed elevated 30 to 45 degrees. Nepro 1.8 (a liquid therapeutic nutritional supplement specifically designed to help meet nutritional needs) was hung on a pole, with the tube feeding (TF) bag approximately full at 1000 milliliters (mL). The bag was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a resident's yelling and disruptive behaviors were communicated to the psychiatric provider and 2) the resident was referred to the behavioral services provider for psychotherapy services for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident 55). The deficient practice potentially had a negative impact on the resident of concern's overall well-being and deprived other residents of the right to live in a peaceful environment free from disruptive noise. Findings include: Resident 55 (R55) R55 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including insomnia, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Psychiatric provider not informed On 06/10/2025 at 9:45 AM, R55 was overheard from the hallway yelling, help! help! help! A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN1) entered R55's room. Upon leaving R55's room, the LPN indicated R55 yelled all the time. On 06/10/2025 at 9:52 AM, R55 was seated in wheelchair and reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, document review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure target behaviors were monitored for a resident receiving medication to treat Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for 1 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #26). This deficient practice had the potential to cause the residents to use unnecessary medication, which may result in possible adverse effects. Findings include: Resident 26 (R26) R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A physician's order dated 04/02/2025 documented Prazosin capsule two milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours for PTSD, target behaviors: night terrors. The psychotropic consult report dated 01/20/2019 documented R26 had a history of being abused as a child and witnessing a violent crime. R26 experienced night terrors related to the incident and had trouble sleeping. R26's medical record lacked documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, document review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% was obtained during medication pass. There were 31 opportunities observed, which revealed three errors. The medication error rate was 9.68%. Failure to follow physician orders during medication administration had the potential to cause harm or injury to residents. Findings include: Resident 82 (R82) R82 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side, major depressive disorder recurrent severe without psychotic features, and generalized anxiety disorder. On 06/12/2025 at 7:17 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepared and administered R82 six medications including Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth and Vistaril (hydroxyzine pamoate) 25 mg (a medication used to treat anxiety), one capsule by mouth. R82's medical record lacked a physician order for Aspirin 81 mg one tablet by mouth. A Physician order dated 11/15/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was in place. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect the outcomes of resident care and the quality of each resident's life. Findings include: On 06/13/2025 at 1:20 PM, the Administrator acknowledged the facility did not have a specific QAPI plan in place. The Administrator explained the facility was using their QAPI policy as their plan. A facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program Committee Guidelines, revised on 12/03/2019, did not identify the requirement of developing a QAPI Plan containing the processes that will guide the nursing home's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved. However, it did document the QAPI Plan is used to guide the organizational and facility performance improvement efforts. According to the state operations manual, the facility is required to develop a QAPI plan and present its plan to federal and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to 1) procure a clean food preparation environment and 2) ensure food products that needed to be refrigerated were kept in a safe temperature range by accurately monitoring the temperature of the walk-in refrigerator. The deficient practice could potentially expose residents to foodborne illnesses. Findings included: On 07/09/24 in the morning, an inspection was conducted with the kitchen manager in the kitchen area. The following issues were identified: 1) Cleanliness: - The exhaust hood over the stove was greasy and visibly dusty outside. - The oven was visibly soiled with greasy matter and dust outside and greasy with food debris inside. - Food debris was observed on the floor behind the oven, stove, and pressure cook. - The floor in the room preparation area was visibly soiled with food debris. A fan was on the floor, blowing air to the table where hamburger patties were being prepared. - The air conditioning (AC) vents were visibly dusty. - An AC vent in the dishwashing area was visibly corroded, with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a walk-in refrigerator was maintained in working condition to keep refrigerated food products in a safe range of temperature. The deficient practice could potentially endanger the safety of the food, exposing residents to foodborne illnesses. Findings included: On 07/09/24 at 9:40 AM, the temperature reading in the external thermometer of the walk-in refrigerator indicated 44 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). The temperature log located at the door of the walk-in refrigerator documented a temperature of 40 °F was obtained in the morning. The two thermometers situated inside the refrigerator read 58 °F each. The kitchen manager indicated that the door of the walk-in refrigerator was opened several times during meal preparation, which could be the reason the temperature dropped. It was suggested the temperature be checked in one hour. On 07/09/2024 at 11:09 AM, the temperature of the walk-in refrigerator was rechecked. The two internal thermometers read 54 °F. The kitchen manager confirmed the observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the signs and symptoms (s/s) of bleeding for a resident on anticoagulants were monitored for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in hemorrhage, an increased risk of severe anemia, and harm to the resident. Findings include: Resident 2 (R2) R2 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage and iron deficiency anemia. A physician order dated 06/10/2024, documented Heparin Solution 5,000 units/milliliters (ml) to be administered subcutaneously every 12 hours for deep vein prophylaxis. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) from June to July 2024, documented the Heparin solution injections were administered as ordered. R2's medical records lacked documented evidence the s/s for bleeding were monitored until 07/11/2024. On 07/09/2024 at 9:34 AM, R2 was in bed, awake, non-verbal and obtunded. The family was at the bedside. A Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide care to prevent a stage 4 pressure ulcer for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 72). The deficient practice caused a wound to develop and not be identified until it had progressed into a stage 4 pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident 72 (R72) R72 was admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including unspecified injury level of cervical spinal cord, paraplegia, muscle wasting and atrophy. Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 01/15/2024, documented total Braden Scale score of 15, which determined R72 was at risk for pressure ulcers. A Skin Risk Analysis and Interventions dated 01/15/2024, documented skin was to be inspected daily, especially bony prominences, repositioned at least every hour and increased frequency of turning. A Wound Information Observation History dated 02/27/2024, documented an unstageable (the stage of the wound was unclear) right buttock ulcer was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for splint application was obtained and implemented to treat a resident's contracture for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Residents 2 and R77), and the care plan was updated following the resident's readmission for 1 of 35 sampled resident (Resident 77). The deficient practice could potentially lead to worsening contractures, decreased mobility, increased pain, and a reduced quality of life for the affected residents. Findings include: R2 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including contracture of the left and right hands and atrophy. The Joint Mobility Screen dated 06/10/2024, documented the inability of R2 to flex and extend the fingers. The Restorative Nursing Care Plan dated 06/10/2024, documented R2's goal of maintaining the current level of function with the use of bilateral upper extremities palm protection or a hand roll for 3-6 hours per day. The Minimum Data Set with R2's functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) the nutritional assessment for a resident on percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was completed upon readmission per policy for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 2), and 2) care orders to manage the PEG tube were obtained and transcribed for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 2). The deficient practice could have the potential to compromise resident safety and well-being, leading to inadequate nutritional support and an increased risk of complications related to PEG tube management. Findings include: Resident 2 (R2) R2 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including anoxic brain injury, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy. 1) On 07/09/2024 at 9:34 AM, R2 was in bed, awake, non-verbal, and obtunded. Tube feeding (TF) Jevity 1.2 was hanging by the bedside and not infusing. The label on the TF bag dated 07/08/2024, indicated a flow rate of 70 milliliters per hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to post daily staffing information in a place accessible to residents and visitors. The deficient practice had the potential to result in a lack of awareness for residents and visitors regarding the type and number of staff on duty on any given day. Findings include: On 07/12/2024 at 8:10 AM, a tour of the facility was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). Licensed nurses and Certified Nurse Assistant assignments were posted on an 8 and 1/2 by 11-inch sized paper near each of the two nursing stations, affixed to the corridor wall about four or five feet above floor level. The posting verbiage was in approximately size-14 font, difficult to read unless close up, and room assignments were hand-written. The staffing documents lacked the total Patient Per Day (PPD) hours information for the facility. The DON verbalized the staffing posting as observed was what the facility customarily posted daily. On 07/12/2024 at 8:20 AM, the Administrator, verbalized knowledge of the requirement to post daily staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was below five (5) percent (%) when two errors were identified with 30 opportunities observed, calculating an error rate of 6.67%. Failure to follow physician orders and timely administer medications posed a potential risk of injury or harm to the resident. Findings include: Resident 55 (R55) R55 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle weakness and spasms. On 07/11/2024 at 8:26 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepared R55's eight medications except B12 and the Refresh eye drop. A Physician order dated 04/19/2024, documented B12 tablets, chewable daily, at 9:00 AM. A Physician order dated 05/13/2024, documented Refresh Classic, one drop in both eyes four times daily. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 07/11/2024, documented R55 refused the B12 and the eye drops. On 07/12/2024 at 11:26 PM, R55 indicated the vitamin B12 and the eye drops had not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had a Director of Nursing (DON) in accordance with the facility assessment. The deficient practice had the potential to compromise supervision of nursing care and oversight. Findings include: The Facility Assessment tool reviewed on 01/18/2023, described staffing resources needed to provide care to the population based on care analysis would include one Director of Nursing, two Assistant Directors of Nursing (ADONs) and one Infection Preventionist/Director of Staff Development. The Facility Assessment tool was re-reviewed on 07/10/2023, which revealed the facility did not have a DON and the DON position had not been filled. On 08/04/2023 at 12:29 PM, the Human Resources (HR) Director explained the DON resigned on 06/02/2023 and the facility had been unsuccessful at hiring a new DON. The HR Director indicated the two ADONs who were Licensed Practical Nurses and the Infection Preventionist who was a Registered Nurse worked their best to perform the DON's duties but collectively, the three employees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) the walk-in freezer was free from ice build-up, 2) rotten vegetables were discarded, 3) opened food items were labeled and dated, 4) kitchen equipment was in working condition, 5) food preparation area and equipment were maintained in a sanitary manner and 6) the sanitation compartment of the three-compartment sink was not too hot. The deficient practice had the potential to serve foods to residents at an increased risk of food safety. Findings include: On 08/02/2023 at 8:20 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen revealed the following: 1) Walk-in freezer had significant ice build-up -freezer pipes were covered in ice -frozen ice covered the door frame and strip curtains from inside the freezer -heavy ice buildup on freezer floor and on top of boxes containing food items 2) Rotten vegetables were discarded -a box filled with rotten cucumbers approximately 25 pieces or more were in the walk-in refrigerator 3) Opened food items were dated and labeled -an opened container of salsa was one-third full and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment in a timely manner for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for receiving inappropriate care. Findings include: Resident 3 (R3) R3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include anoxic brain damage and muscular dystrophy (group of diseases that cause progressive weakness and loss of muscle mass). R3's medical record revealed the last annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was dated 07/19/2022. On 08/04/2023 in the afternoon, two MDS Coordinators explained an annual MDS assessment should be conducted a year following the last annual date, with a grace period of seven days. The two MDS Coordinators confirmed R3's medical record lacked an annual MDS assessment for July 2023 due to an oversight. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service Resident Assessment Instrument (version 3.0 manual; dated October 2019) documented an annual assessment was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 7 (R7) R7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, anorexia, and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties). A Nutrition care plan initiated on 06/26/2017, revealed R7 was at risk for weight loss due to current body weight, disease state, advanced age, and increased needs due to therapy and healing. Interventions included offering snacks twice a day. On 08/02/2023 at 12:12 PM, three Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) verbalized R7 ate snacks brought in by a family member. On 08/03/2023 at 09:10 AM, a CNA indicated R7 had a snack drawer which R7 could access when they wanted a snack. The CNA indicated the snacks in R7 snack drawer was provided from a family member and not by the facility. The CNA noted R7 did not like the sandwiches the facility provided for a snack. On 08/03/2023 at 09:24 AM, with permission, the same CNA opened R7's snack drawer and a couple of cookies, an individual pudding, and a banana on top of the drawer, were observed. The CNA informed they did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a psychiatry evaluation was provided per the physician's order for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 31). The deficient practice had the potential for the facility not providing the appropriate care and services to the resident. Findings include: Resident 31 (R31) R31 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, unspecified mood (affective) disorder, insomnia due to medical condition, and anxiety disorder. The physician's order dated 04/17/2023, documented consult: psychiatry evaluation and treat. R31's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented psychological therapy (by any licensed mental health professional) was not administered to the resident for at least 15 minutes a day in the last seven days. The physician's order dated 07/31/2023, documented psychiatry consult for refusal of wound care due to depression. R31's Wound Treatment Administration History for July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a pack of cigarettes and lighter were not kept inside a resident's room for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 221); and failed to monitor the residents who were smoking for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 221) and one unsampled resident (Resident 68). The deficient practice had the potential for the residents, and the facility in general, to be at risk for accidents. Findings include: Resident 221 (R221) R221 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including restlessness and agitation, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, and acute pain due to trauma. The Focused Observation form dated 07/29/2023, documented R221 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. On 08/02/2023 at 9:04 AM, R221 was not inside the resident's room. There was a pack of cigarettes observed on top of the resident's bedside table. On 08/02/2023 at 9:58 AM, R221 confirmed keeping the cigarettes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to 1) provide three fortified meals a day as ordered and offer snacks as care planned for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 7) and 2) obtain weights per facility policy for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice placed the residents at risk for malnutrition. Findings include: Resident 7 (R7) R7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, anorexia, and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 99 (unable to complete the interview) and required supervision with set up assistance for eating. A physician's order dated 07/03/2017, documented to give fortified food, one serving with meals three times a day. A physician's order dated 07/11/2023, documented to give Super soup (fortified) once a day at 9 AM, to provide extra nutrients to compensate for low food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY gastrostomy tube (G-tube) feeding and water flush bag were labeled with the name of the resident, room number, infusion rate, and date and time the feeding and water flushes started; the correct amount of G-tube water flush was provided, and G-tube placement was verified prior to starting the feeding for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 222). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident receiving expired or incorrect G-tube feeding, inaccurate rate of feeding and water flushes, and develop complications from incorrect amount of water flush and incorrect placement of the G-tube. Findings include: Resident 222 (R222) R222 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, nausea with vomiting, and cognitive communication deficit. The physician's order dated [DATE], documented check feeding tube placement per facility policy. The physician's order dated [DATE], documented Jevity 1.2 at 85 milliliters (ml) per hour for 18 hours (2:00 PM - 8:00 AM) or until full volume…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure there was proper coordination of care with the dialysis provider regarding the resident's persistent refusal of dialysis treatments and care of the resident's central venous catheter (CVC) during non-use for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 45). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for a CVC infection, sepsis up to and including death. Findings include: R45 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease and acute kidney failure. On 08/02/2023 at 10:23 AM, R45 laid in bed while having casual conversation with roommate. The resident's gown was slightly pulled down which revealed a right CVC with an exposed insertion site. The resident indicated the CVC was for the dialysis clinic's use. On 08/03/2023 at 12:26 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) were in R45's room when R45 pulled down frontal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an unnecessary medication (duplicative anti-psychotic order) was discontinued per the physician orders for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 79) and an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) was completed on admission for a resident who was receiving anti-psychotic medication (R31). The deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse consequences for the resident's health and well-being. Findings include: Resident 79 (R79) R79 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The medical record revealed an after-visit note from a specialty clinic on 07/14/2023, documented to discontinue the bedtime dose of Nuplazid (20mg) after one more dose. A prescription order from the specialty clinic dated 07/14/2023, documented Nuplazid 10 mg tablets, give 2 tablets at bedtime for one dose and discontinue medication. The medical record indicated R79…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir at MemorialDenison, TX 1 of 5Bennettsville Health And Rehabilitation CenterBennettsville, SC 1 of 5Calhoun Convalescent CenterSaint Matthews, SC 1 of 5Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the ParkwayCorinth, TX 1 of 5Forest Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation CtrCatonsville, MD 1 of 5Julia Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Lake Emory Post Acute CareInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenwoodGreenwood, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - InmanInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - Rock HillRock Hill, SC 1 of 5Northampton Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenteFrederick, MD 1 of 5Oakbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterSummerville, SC 1 of 5Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOakland, MD 1 of 5Physical Rehabilitation And Wellness Center Of SpaSpartanburg, SC 1 of 5Riverside Health and RehabCharleston, SC 1 of 5San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care CenterRound Rock, TX 1 of 5Springdale Healthcare CenterCamden, SC 2 of 5Berlin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBerlin, MD 2 of 5Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBremond, TX 2 of 5Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCrownsville, MD 2 of 5Faith Healthcare CenterFlorence, SC 2 of 5Falcon Ridge RehabilitationHutto, TX 2 of 5Hillside Heights Rehabilitation SuitesAmarillo, TX 2 of 5Lancaster Health and RehabilitationLancaster, SC 2 of 5Las Ventanas De SocorroSocorro, TX 2 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenvilleGreenville, SC 2 of 5Midlands Health & Rehabilitation CenterColumbia, SC 2 of 5Mira Vista CourtFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Moran Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWesternport, MD 2 of 5North Las Vegas Care CenterNorth las Vegas, NV 2 of 5Pavilion at Glacier ValleySlinger, WI 2 of 5Sandy Lake Rehabilitation And Care CenterCoppell, TX 2 of 5Southpointe Healthcare and RehabilitationGreenville, SC 2 of 5Spanish Hills Wellness SuitesLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Terra Bella Health and Wellness SuitesHouston, TX 2 of 5The Pavilion At CreekwoodMansfield, TX 2 of 5Villa Rosa Nursing And Rehabilitation, LLCMitchellville, MD 3 of 5Bridgecrest Rehabilitation SuitesHouston, TX 3 of 5Crimson Heights Health & WellnessHumble, TX 3 of 5Devlin Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCumberland, MD

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THI OF NEVADA II INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/30/2003
HAGAR, JAMESIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/26/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nevada
$11,786/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,463/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,241/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295017. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next