Villa Rosa Nursing And Rehabilitation, LLC
3800 Lottsford Vista Road, Mitchellville, MD 20721 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 107 certified beds · (301) 459-4700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 39.9% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.9% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 48.8% | 22.2% | 16.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.5% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.2% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.1% | 25.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.5% | 80.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.7% | 21.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.9% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.15 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.81 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 207 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.1%CMS range 53.6–64.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.7%CMS range 11.4–18.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 91.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 4.6–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 74.0 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.478 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-01 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to have a qualified full-time staff person to carry out food and nutrition services in the facility. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include:Review of anonymous complaint # 2963054 on 4/28/26 at approximately 1:00 PM revealed concerns including but not limited to menus, scheduled meal times, and alternate food items. During an interview on 4/29/26 at 11:29 AM the Administrator revealed that Staff #11 the Food Service Manager (FSM) was not in the facility, was out on extended medical leave since 1/29/26 and the facility was utilizing their dietician. He further revealed that the dietician was in the facility once per week. When asked who was overseeing the meal services and day to day operations of the kitchen he stated, myself and a remote dietician. He confirmed that he was not certified in food service management. He was asked to provide a schedule for the staff overseeing the day-to-day food service operations of the facility during the FSM's long term absence.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-01 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespreadRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct regular inspections of resident beds. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include:Review of anonymous complaint #2963504 on 4/28/26 at 1:00 PM revealed a concern regarding bed inspections. The surveyor was informed by the Administrator that the Director of Maintenance was not in the facility at that time. The facility's bed inspection logs were requested for review. On 4/29/26 at 11:29 AM, after several additional requests for the logs, the Administrator was asked if routine inspection of the beds was actually conducted. He indicated yes but we haven't kept very good records. During an interview on 4/29/26 at 11:50 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator provided copies of maintenance logs dated from 1/2025 - 4/8/2026. Review of the logs at that time revealed concerns identified by staff related to a variety of areas and equipment in need of repair. However, the logs did not reflect routine inspection of the facility's beds as required. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a safe functional and sanitary environment. This was evident for 8 of 8 resident hallways observed on both floors of the facility. The findings include:During a tour of the facility on 5/1/26 from 2:13 PM - 3:15 PM observation in the hallways of the A, B, C and D wings on both floors of the facility revealed:Broken, damaged, sagging and missing ceiling tiles. Missing covers over ceiling access panels. Areas of the plaster/drywall ceilings that were damaged or patched but not painted or otherwise sealed. [NAME] and black stains on plaster/drywall and tile ceilings. Dirty/stained/damaged ceiling fixtures including but not limited to vents, light fixtures and speaker covers. Square ceiling air handler units were located at intervals in several hallways. The units were low profile, with a vent like central air intake panel and louver type air outflow vents along the perimeter on all four edges. The air intake panel in every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to include a copy of the written notification of transfer or discharge in the resident's medical record. This was evident for 1 (#4) of 3 residents reviewed for complaints. The findings include: On 4/27/26 at 10:08 AM, a review of complaint # 2808503 alleged the facility provided Resident #4 a verbal notice that s/he was to discharge from the facility on 3/18/26, however the facility failed to provide the resident with a written notice of discharge on [DATE] at 10:35 AM a review of Resident #4's medical record documented that the resident was admitted to the facility in the beginning of February 2026 following an acute hospitalization and discharged from the facility towards the end of March 2026. Continued review of the medical record failed to reveal evidence that the facility provided a written notification of discharge to Resident #4 prior to his/her discharge. On 4/29/26 at 1:52 PM, during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of staff records and facility staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that all nursing staff had competency skill evaluations. This was evident for 5 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) (GNA #2, GNA #3, GNA #6, GNA #7, GNA#18) of 5 GNA records reviewed. The findings include:A nursing competency is a set of knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) needed for an individual to successfully perform various job duties. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) guidance clarifies that competency cannot be demonstrated by documenting that staff attended a training or watched a video. A skills checklist must include a return demonstration (practical application) for physical skills.Relias training provides online learning, compliance, and performance management solutions for healthcare, offering accredited online courses and videos for staff development, mandatory compliance, and continuing education (CE).On 01/14/2026 at 12:36 PM, a review of 5 GNA's (GNA #2, GNA #3, GNA #6, GNA #7, GNA#18) employee files showed the facility utilized online training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety in the kitchen. This practice had the potential to affect all residents that eat food prepared by the facility's kitchen. The findings include: 1. During a tour of the Kitchen with the Dietary Manager on 1/05/2026 at 8:08 AM it was discovered to have food products that had been opened and undated, unsealed and had expired food products. During observation of the walk-in refrigerator the following items were found:A Vital Cuisine Mighty Shake with a use by date of 12/03/2025 which was removed by the Dietary Manager after finding. Tuna fish was found in a plastic container covered with plastic wrap and was not labeled with a date of opening or expiration date. Two strawberry pies wrapped in plastic that were not labeled with a date of opening or expiration date. A cup of fruit had been made and was not labeled with a date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
citeBased on interview and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to (1) implement measures to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building's water systems, and (2) ensure proper storage of clean linens. These deficiencies were identified during the Infection Control review conducted as part of the annual survey and have the potential to affect all residents.The findings include:(1)Legionella is a type of bacteria commonly found in water systems that can cause Legionnaires' disease, a serious form of pneumonia, when contaminated water droplets are inhaled.On 01/12/2026 at 2:11 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP), who confirmed that there have been no reported cases of Legionella or other opportunistic waterborne pathogens at the facility.On 01/13/2026 at 9:42 AM, an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director regarding the facility's water management practices. When asked how the facility prevents waterborne pathogens, including Legionella, he reported that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1) medication carts were locked and resident health information was protected. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 3 medication carts observed and 7 out of 29 opportunities to protect resident health information, 2) a physician order was implemented. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #2) out of 1 Resident reviewed for physician orders, 3) behavior monitoring was conducted. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #56, #12 & #66) out of 3 Residents reviewed for behavior monitoring, and 4) medication was properly administered. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #22) out of 1 Resident reviewed for medication administration. It was determined that the facility failed to provide care that meets professional standards of practice during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 01/08/2026 at 5:57 AM, during first-floor unit rounds on B-Wing, the surveyor observed a medication cart left unlocked and unattended. At the same time, an unlocked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
cite:Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to educate and offer the COVID-19 immunization to residents. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #3, #6, #4 and #56) out of 5 Residents reviewed for vaccination status. The findings include:On 01/12/2026 at 9:32 AM, a record review revealed that Residents #3, #4, #6, and #56 did not have documentation of COVID-19 vaccine administration or refusal for 2025. Resident #3's last COVID-19 vaccine was 04/04/2022, Resident #4's was 11/20/2024, Resident #6's was 10/08/2022, and Resident #56's was 11/13/2021.On 01/12/2026 at 2:11 PM, this surveyor conducted an interview with the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) regarding the process for offering COVID-19 vaccination to residents. The IP reported that each year she offers the vaccine to all residents, and that for the 2025-2026 season, she began offering COVID-19 vaccines in October. She stated that education is provided to residents at the time the vaccine is offered. When asked if refusals are documented, the IP reported that refusals are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment that promotes resident dignity. This was evident for 2 (Resident #56 and #61) of 2 residents observed for dignity during the recertification survey.The findings include: 1) On 01/05/2026 at 8:31 AM, the Surveyors observed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #2 enter Resident #56's room without knocking or introducing herself. GNA #2 tried to quickly exit the room once she saw the Surveyors inside the room. During an interview conducted on 01/05/2026 at 8:31 AM, GNA#2 could not provide an explanation as to why she entered Resident #56's room without knocking or introducing herself. GNA #2 stated I saw the door closed and I came to see why. On 01/12/2026 at 12:50 PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed it is the facility's expectation for a GNA or any staff to knock on the door and wait for a response from the resident before entering the Resident's room. If the Resident is nonverbal, staff are to still knock and wait to see if there are any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
cite:Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) to resident who was discharged from Medicare Part A services but had benefit days remaining and intended to remain at the nursing facility receiving non-skilled care. This was evident for 1 resident (#11) of 3 residents reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification. The findings include: The Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) provides information to residents/beneficiaries that services may no longer be covered by Medicare and addresses the resident's liability for payment should they wish to continue receiving the skilled services. The NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-coverage) informs the beneficiary of his or her right to file appeal of the decision and right to an expedited review of Medicare non-coverage of services. On 01/14/2026 at 2:15 PM, a review of the facility's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review Worksheet indicated that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
cite:Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and safe environment. This was evident during the Infection Control review conducted as part of the annual survey. This deficiency has the potential to affect all residents.The findings include:On 01/12/2026 at 10:55 AM, this surveyor observed a large hole in the ceiling in the Laundry room, in the clean clothes drying area. The hole exposed pipes, dust, and drywall. Photographs of the observation were taken at this time.On 01/12/2026 at 11:29 AM, this surveyor observed a large hole in the ceiling in the clean linen folding room. There was a ceiling fan near the edge of the hole, and the hole exposed pipes, dust, and drywall. Photographs of the observation were taken at this time.On 01/14/2026 at 09:45 AM, this surveyor conducted an interview with the Maintenance Director regarding building maintenance and plumbing concerns. The Maintenance Director reported that he has observed ongoing leaks in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 1) an allegation of neglect was reported to the Office of Health Care Quality no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made. This was evident for 1 (Resident #61) out of 6 residents reviewed for neglect allegations and 2) to report the malfunction of the HVAC heating system to the State Agency the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 1 out 8 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include: 1) On 01/05/2026 at 3:15 PM, this surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #61. When asked whether the Resident had ever felt mistreated by a staff member, Resident #61 reported mistreatment by Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #5. Resident #61 stated that this concern was communicated to a family member, who then reported the concern to the facility, although the Resident was unsure to whom the report was made. On 01/07/2026 at 11:01 AM, this surveyor conducted a record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
cite:Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #61) out of 6 residents reviewed for allegation of neglect. The findings include:On 01/07/2026 at 11:01 AM, a record review of the facility's investigation file for a facility-reported incident of alleged neglect involving Resident #61 by Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #5 was conducted. The review showed that the initial report of the allegation was submitted to the Office of Health Care Quality on 10/29/2025 by the Administrator. The final investigation report was submitted to the Office of Health Care Quality on 11/04/2025, also by the Administrator. The report indicated that GNA #5 was suspended on 10/29/2025 and returned to work on 11/01/2025.A continued record review of the investigation file on 01/07/2026 at approximately 11:35 AM showed that the file included a statement from the Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager, dated 11/04/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and facility staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1) the resident/resident representative received the bed hold notification form in writing. This was evident for 1 (resident #79) of 2 residents reviewed for transfers during the recertification survey and 2) the local ombudsman was notified of facility discharges. This was evident for 2 (Residents #76 & #80) of 2 residents reviewed for discharges during the recertification survey. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures after discovering the delay in ombudsman reporting prior to the start of this survey. Therefore, this deficiency was found to be past noncompliant with a compliance date of [DATE]. The findings Include: 1) On [DATE] at 1:00 PM, a review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #2598892 investigation revealed Resident #79 fell while self transferring out of the wheelchair to the toilet in the bathroom. 911 was activated and the Resident was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of records and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for 1 (Resident #7) out of 1 residents reviewed for care plans during the recertification survey. The findings include:Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 01/12/2026 at 9:58 AM, review of Resident #7 records revealed medical orders for: Encourage oral fluid intake 300 ML(milliliters) every shift. Fluids to be provided by a Licensed Nurse every shift. Activities of daily living are basic routine tasks that most healthy individuals can perform without assistance. These activities include personal care tasks such as eating, dressing, bathing, toileting, managing continence, and transferring (moving from 1 position to another). The ability to perform activities of daily living is an essential measure of an individual's functional status. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided quarterly care plan meetings. This was evident for 3 (Resident#35,# 8 and #1) out of 26 Residents reviewed for care plan meetings during the recertification survey. The findings include: A Care Plan is used in nursing facilities to summarize a resident's health conditions and care needs. It is used to ensure resident's needs are met and consistent care is provided to the resident based on those needs. Care Plan meetings are meetings with a team of care providers (attending physician, a registered nurse with responsibility for the resident, nursing assistant with responsibility for the resident, dietary services, the resident, and the resident's representative if applicable) to ensure the plan is continually adjusted to meet the changing needs or concerns of residents. Care Plan meetings are required to be held quarterly and as needed. 1) During an interview with Resident #35 on 1/05/2026 at 2:20 PM he/she denied having any recent care plan meetings. During a medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews, observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow procedures during wound care to a resident with a pressure ulcer. This was evident for 1 (#22) out of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care during the recertification survey.The findings include: A pressure ulcer, also known as a bed sore or decubitus ulcer, is a localized area of skin damage that develops when prolonged pressure or shear forces disrupt blood flow to the tissues resulting in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged based on their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater), Stage III (full-thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater) or Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon). 1. During a medical record review 1/06/26 at 1:41 PM it was revealed that Resident #22 had a Stage IV sacral pressure ulcer (PU) since 12/2024 and was receiving wound care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
cite:Based on medication administration observation, medical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that licensed facility staff failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent during the medication pass observation. This was evident for 2 Residents (#85 and #16) of 10 residents observed. A total of 29 medication administration opportunities were reviewed, resulting in a medication error rate of 10.34%. The findings include:On 01/08/2026 at 6:26 AM, during a medication administration observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #17, was observed crushing Resident #16's medications; Tylenol 325 mg, two (2) tablets, and pantoprazole 40 mg, one (1) tablet and administering them mixed in applesauce. On 01/08/2026 at 6:30 AM, during reconciliation of Resident #16's Medication Administration Record (MAR), the physician's orders indicated Tylenol 325 mg, two (2) tablets by mouth at 6:00 a.m., and Pantoprazole 40 mg, one (1) tablet by mouth at 6:00 a.m. There were no orders to crush the medications or mix them in applesauce. On 01/08/2026 at 6:40 AM, review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
citeBased on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications, as evidenced by medications not being properly labeled or dated. This was evident in 1 of 2 medication rooms and 4 of 4 medication carts observed during the recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: On 01/12/2026 at 6:17 AM, during a medication cart observation on the 1st floor C and D-Wing with Registered Nurse (RN) #26, the surveyor observed opened medications without documented open dates or resident identification. Resident-specific medications included Resident #70's Albuterol and Ellipta inhalers, Resident #10's Albuterol inhaler, Resident #9's Simethicone (1 fl oz/30 mL), and Resident #1's Albuterol inhaler. Additional opened medications stored without identification or documented open dates included Calcium + D3 (1 bottle), Vitamin C 1000 mg (1 bottle), Vitamin D 125 mg (1 bottle), and Tylenol 500 mg (1 bottle). One Glucagon Emergency Kit with the label torn off was also observed without resident identification or a documented open date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of resident medical records and facility staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #56) of 1 resident reviewed during the annual recertification survey. The findings include:Diabetes Mellitus (DM) II : Is a condition characterized by high blood glucose (blood sugar) levels caused by either a lack of insulin or the body's inability to use insulin efficientlyOn 01/07/2026 at 9:48 AM, a review of Resident #56's Medical Record confirmed a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) II. Finger stick: A way to check your blood glucose level (BGL) using a lancet to prick the side of a fingertip (often the middle or ring finger), collecting a drop of blood on a test strip, and inserting the strip into a glucose meter to get a reading in seconds. BGL is measured in milligrams per deciliter, or mg/dL.On 01/07/2026 at 9:50 AM, a review of Resident #56's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed an order for: Check finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) before breakfast and Dinner call Medical Doctor (MD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the environmental equipment was functional. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 2 Solariums observed during the recertification survey.The findings include: On 01/05/2026 at 7:30 AM the Survey team conducted an unannounced entry of the facility to conduct a recertification and complaint survey. The night Registered Nurse (RN) #17 advised the team to have a seat because he needed to contact the Administrator and Maintenance Director to assign the Survey team a room because the usual room (1st floor B-wing Solarium) did not have heat. At 8:19 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 met the Survey team and moved the team from the lobby of the facility to a room on the second floor C-wing. On 01/05/2025 at 8:30 AM the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) met with the team and explained that the room that is usually assigned to the Surveyors did not have heat and that the Maintenance Director was working on the heat. On 01/05/2026 at the end of the day the Survey team was moved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with reasonable accommodations of needs. This was found evident of 5 (Resident #18, #11, #66, #81 & #2) out of 62 residents reviewed. The finding include: 1a) On 5/15/24 at 8:18 AM, the surveyor, along with Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) Staff # 43, observed Resident #18 laying in bed. The surveyor asked Resident #18 where his/her call light was in case he/she needed to call for assistance. Resident #18 stated he/she did not know. At this time Staff #43 picks up the call light cord from behind Resident #18's bed and clips it to Resident 18's bed. Staff #43 confirmed that the call light was out of reach and should have been placed back in bed after it was removed. On 5/15/24 at 12:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed a progress note written on 2/24/24 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff #46. The note stated Resident #18 was a new admission adjusting well. It further stated Resident #18 demonstrates appropriate use of the call bell this day. On 5/16/24 at 9:59 AM, the surveyor informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and facility staff interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and comfortable home like environment free of possible hazards. This was evident for 5 residents ( # 40, #67, #24, #85, & #542) out of 62 residents observed for home like environment and 4 out of 6 shower and bathing environments observed in the facility. The findings include: During tour of the facility on 05/13/24 at 9:215 AM, surveyors observed: In Resident # 40's room: - Extensive paint damage on all walls (peeled/removed). - One green Geri- chair (a large padded chair with a wheeled base, designed to assist seniors with limited mobility) a the resident's -bedside with tattered arm rests, inner material visible. - A mattress air flow device attached to the foot of the resident's bed, with it's black power cord on the floor, plugged into an electrical wall socket located a the base of the wall opposite the resident's bed; the cord covered a distance of approximately 3 feet, cord approximately 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ), immediately but not later than 2 hours after the abuse allegation was made. This was evident for 5 (Resident #57, #34, #93, #51, and #19) out of 30 residents reviewed for facility self-report incidents during an annual survey. The findings include: 1). Review, on 05/29/24 at 10:25 AM, of the facility's self-report investigation file revealed that the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADoN) documented on the Facility's Incident Investigation Form in reference to Resident #57 incident the time was on 06/28/23 at 3:00 PM. Based on the allegation of abuse/harm, the facility's self-report (MD00193871) had to be sent to the State agency no later than 2 hours after the incident had occurred or was reported. Further review revealed that staff had sent the facility self-report to the State agency, on 06/28/23 at 5:37 PM, 2 hours and 37 minutes later. During the interview, on 5/30/24 at 09:30 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) thoroughly investigate alleged violations of abuse, and 2) prevent further potential of abuse while an investigation was in process. This was found evident of 6 (Resident #91, #108, #2, #19, #93, & #21) of 30 residents investigated for Facility Reported Incidents(FRI). The findings include: 1a) On 5/14/24 at 10:33 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #91's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #91 was admitted to the facility in late 2022 and had a past medical history that included, but not limited to, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, adult failure to thrive, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness (generalized). Further review revealed Resident #91 was assessed with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment and received a score of 15, the highest score, indicating he/she was cognitively intact. On 5/14/24 at 11:12 AM, the surveyor reviewed the investigation report the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and medical record review it was determined the facility failed to provide notification to the Ombudsman and the Responsible Party of the residents that transferred to the hospital. This was evident for 7 residents (#19, #44, #6, #41, #62, #71, and #40) out of 7 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The findings include: 1) During a phone interview on 5/15/24 at 11:43 AM with Resident #19's daughter, the daughter stated that Resident #19 has had 2 hospitalizations recently. On 5/21/24 at 7:45 am the surveyor reviewed Resident #19's medical record. The review of the medical record revealed that Resident #19 was transferred to the hospital on March 4, 2024, and May 4, 2024. Further review of Resident #19's medical record revealed that there was no documentation that the facility Ombudsman was notified of Resident #19's transfer to the hospital on 3/4/24 or on 5/4/24. The Director of Nursing at 11:20 am on 5/23/24 conveyed to the surveyor that they are unable to locate documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 4 (#41, #62, #71, and #40) of 7 residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. On 05/22/2024 at 06:55 AM, an interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the staff responsible for keeping record of written bed hold notices from 2019-2023 no longer works at facility. The DON further stated that the current Business Manager is new to the facility and is not familiar with where records of the bed hold notices are kept. On 05/28/2024 at 09:15 AM, a review of Resident #41's electronic medical record revealed that Resident #41 was transferred to the hospital for further evaluation of his/her medical needs on the following dates: 06/02/2023, 03/26/2024 and 05/21/2024. Further review of Resident #41's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a baseline care plan was created within the required 2 days and ensure a written summary of the baseline care was provided to the resident/resident representative. This was evident for 4 Residents (#542, #41, #58, and #71) out of 62 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: The baseline care plan must be completed within 48 hours of admission. It must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident immediately upon their admission, which would address resident-specific health and safety. Completion and implementation of the baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission is intended to promote continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff, increase resident safety, and safeguard against adverse events (undesirable outcomes) that are most likely to occur right after admission. 1. A review of Resident #542's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for: 1) residents with a history of seizure disorder currently taking medication for the condition, 2) a resident prescribed opioids for pain relief, and 3) a resident's pressure ulcer and a fungal skin infection. This was evident for 4 residents (Residents #60, #65, #96 and #64) out of 62 residents with care plans reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments. It outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care needs. This helps to evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a standardized, comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status to develop a plan of care based on the resident's individualized needs. 1a.On 5/23/2024 at 1:18 PM, during review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised after 1) a resident's hospitalization and quarterly assessment and 2) a resident whose medication for depression was discontinued. This was found to be evident for 2 residents ( Res. #60 and Res. #64) out of 8 residents reviewed for care plans during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments. It outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care needs. This helps to evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a standardized, comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status to develop a plan of care based on the resident's individualized needs. On 5/23/2024 at 1:18 PM, During review of Resident #60 electronic medical record, the Surveyor discovered that the resident has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide on-going personalized activities to meet the resident's needs and failed to inform or offer a resident the opportunity to attend facility activities. This was evident for 4 (Resident #34, #60, #65, & #542) out of 6 residents reviewed for the personalized activities during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) Observation, on 5/14/24 at 09:43 AM and 5/15/24 at 10:05AM for over an hour each time, found that Resident#4 was able to feed herself, change his/her position from side to side and clean her bedside table. However, the resident was confined to his/her room, dozing off after breakfast with the TV on. During another observation and interview, on 05/14/24 at 1:00 PM, Resident #34 stated I would like to go for group activity sometimes. There was no evidence that the activity staff provided any social group or one-to-one activity adequate provision of personalized activities. Record review, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required Geriatric Nursing Assistant performance reviews were completed. This was evident in 4 out of 4 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) #6,12, 23 and 24 employee files reviewed for required performance reviews. The findings include: On 5/30/24 at 9:57 AM, the surveyor reviewed 4 Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) employee files #6,12, 23 and 24. During the review of the 4 employee files the surveyor discovered that the facility did not have current performance reviews in the employee files for all 4 GNAs #6,12, 23 and 24 for 2023 and 2024. At 12:30 PM on 5/31/24 the surveyor interviewed the Director of Human Resources #37 and the Interim Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). During the interview the surveyor informed the Director of Human Resources and the Interim NHA that the 4 GNAs #6,12, 23 and 24 employee files did not contain any performance reviews for 2023 and 2024. The Director of Human Resources confirmed that the 4 GNA employee files #6,12, 23 and 24 did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the safety of food products and food service areas. This was evident for food storage areas reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: During observation of the facility kitchen on 05/13/24, the surveyor observed vanilla flavoring boxes with a handwritten date of 1/11/22. During an interview with Staff #49 on 5/13/24 at 9:30 AM, she was asked about the date written on the vanilla flavoring boxes and the shelf life. Staff #49 stated that's the date it came in, then confirmed it, she said she thought they lasted a couple of years but was unsure. During observation of the facility kitchen on 5/14/24 the surveyor observed two busted cans of ginger ale that were in the stand up freezers and were split almost in half. They were sitting in a container of frozen lemon ice cups. During observation of the facility kitchen on 5/14/24, the surveyor observed a jar of grape jelly opened to 3/4 full in a dry storage room. The label recommended refrigeration after opening. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required in-service training for Geriatric Nursing Assistants was completed. This was evident in 2 (Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) #23 and #24) out of 4 employee files reviewed for required in-service training records. The findings include: On 5/30/24 at 9:57 am, the surveyor conducted a record review for 4 Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) employee files #6, 12, 23 and 24. During the review of the 4 employee files the surveyor discovered that the facility had incomplete required in-service training for 2023 and 2024 for 2 GNAs #23 and #24. At 12:30 pm on 5/31/24 the surveyor interviewed the Interim Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). During the interview the surveyor informed the Interim NHA that GNA employee files had incomplete in-service training for 2023 and 2024 for 2 GNAs #23 and #24. The Interim NHA confirmed that there was incomplete in-service training for the 2 GNAs #23 and #24 for 2023 and 2024. The Interim Nursing Home Administrator stated that she would look…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview with residents and staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and enhance the dignity of residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #81) out of 3 residents reviewed for dignity during the annual survey. The findings include: A Hoyer lift is a mechanical lifting device that allows a person to be lifted and transferred to the bed or chair with a minimum of physical effort. On 5/14/2024 at 1:37 PM, during a tour of the first floor B Unit, the Surveyor noted Resident #81 in the doorway of his/her room, sitting in a wheelchair with a Hoyer pad underneath him, and his head down. The resident's call bell was alarming. The Surveyor conducted an interview with the resident and discovered that he/she had been sitting there for over 40 minutes waiting for someone to assist him/her back to bed. The resident stated that a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) left him/her there to locate a Hoyer lift to transfer him/her back to bed. Resident #81 mentioned that he/she had not been happy lately and was very upset because finding a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to support resident choices. This was evident for 2 (Resident #85 and #542) out of 4 residents reviewed for choices during the annual survey. The findings include: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are activities related to personal care. They include bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating. During an interview conducted on 5/14/2024 at 9:04 AM, Resident #60 informed the Surveyor that he/she would like to go to Mass services in the morning, but he/she must wait for the Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) to finish up with the other residents before they can assist him/her with ADLs for the day. The resident stated he/she must wait until about 11:00 AM before the GNA can get to him/her. The resident also mentioned that, on the days of Mass, he/she would like to be assisted with ADLs first thing in the morning so he/she can attend services. While…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident, who was dependent on staff for turning and repositioning, from falling out of bed during care. This was evident for 1(Resident #65) of 1 resident reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized, primary screening and assessment tool of health status which forms the foundation of the comprehensive assessment for all residents of long-term care facilities certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. The MDS contains items that measure physical, psychological, and psycho-social functioning. The items in the MDS give a multidimensional view of the patient's functional capacities. A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments. It also outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care. This helps to evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to initiate appropriate bladder and bowel interventions to maintain dignity for (Resident #85). This was evident for 1 of 61 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #85 on 05/13/24 at 11:13 AM, the resident stated that he/she could walk but had consistently worn a brief since admitted to the facility. He/she expressed the desire to use the bathroom. Resident #85 stated that he/she walks to therapy and other areas in the facility using a walker. During an interview with GNA #35 on 05/21/24 at 09:59 AM they were asked about the care she provided for Resident #85. GNA #35 stated she gave him/her a shower, oral care, and assisted with transfer to wheelchair. She also stated the resident stays in the room, he/she uses a walker to transfer to a wheelchair, and he/she would try to get to the bathroom. GNA #35 confirmed the resident wore briefs and occasionally used a urinal but she cleaned him/her up during her morning shift. GNA #35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to label and store medications appropriately. This was evident in 1 (Resident #27) out of 1 Resident for medication labeling and storage. The findings include: During the initial tour of the second floor Nursing Unit A at 7:49 AM on 5/14/24 the surveyors observed Resident #27 in bed with medications at his/her bedside. The surveyors observed 2 medication cups, one sat inside the other on the overbed tray table. There were 2 small white tablets in one of the medication cups and an orange-colored tablet in the other medication cup. The surveyors interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 at 8:09 AM on 5/14/24 who observed the medications at the bedside, 2 small white tablets and an orange-colored tablet in the medication cups. LPN #1 stated to the surveyors that she was unsure of what the medications were and that she had not given the medications to Resident #27. LPN #1 further indicated that she did observe Resident #27 take the 8:00 AM medications that were scheduled to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident requesting dental services received a timely appointment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #60) out of 2 residents investigated for dental services during the annual survey. The findings include: During an interview conducted on 5/14/2024 at 9:00 AM with Resident #60, the resident stated, I need to go to the dentist. The resident informed the Surveyor that he/she has not received any dental services while residing at the facility. On 5/24/2024 at 8:15 AM, review of Resident #60's electronic medical record revealed a nursing progress note written on 10/03/2023 at 12:08 PM written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #56 stating that the resident was requesting for [Company] dental. Additional record review revealed a nursing progress note dated 2/25/2024 at 8:33 AM written by LPN # 57 which stated Resident #60 was complaining of a toothache and another nursing progress note dated 2/25/2024 at 3:05 PM, stated that an order for pain relief medication and an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete by voiding old MOLST forms when new MOLST forms were completed. This was evident for 1 (Resident #60) of 62 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a form which includes medical orders for emergency medical services or other medical personnel regarding CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and other life-sustaining treatment options. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a lifesaving technique used in emergencies in which someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped. A full code provides full support, including CPR, and allows all interventions needed to restore breathing and/or heart functioning. During review of Resident #60's electronic medical record on [DATE] at 9:20 AM, the Surveyor discovered the 2 MOLST forms. The first completed MOLST form was signed and dated [DATE], certifying that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to ensure that a staff member implemented appropriate processes related to handling and storing of a shared resident medical equipment. As a result, the potential existed for transmission of organisms between residents who received assessments of their blood pressure during medication observation. This was evident for 2 Residents (#2 and #68) of 5 observed during medication administration. The findings include: On 05/30/24 at 11:02 AM a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff #19, was observed during medication administration to remove a blood pressure machine from the medication cart, apply the blood pressure cuff onto Resident #68's left arm, and place the attached digital screen on the resident's bedside table. After completing the assessment, Staff #19 placed the machine on the medication cart. On 5/30/24 at 11:18 AM surveyors conducted an interview with Staff # 19 promptly after the observation which revealed that Staff #19 confirmed that the blood pressure machine was for use with all residents for whom she was assigned. Staff #19 confirmed that she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an adequate functioning call system in resident bathrooms. This was evident for 2 (Resident #85 and #542) of 62 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: During observation of Resident #85's room on 05/13/24 at 11:13 AM, surveyor observation determined an inadequate call system in Resident #85's bathroom. The call system was missing the string that is to be pulled for residents to access. During observation of Resident #542's room on 05/13/24 at 11:21 AM, surveyor observation determined an inadequate call system in Resident #542's bathroom. The call system was missing the pull cord used for emergencies. During interview with Maintenance Director (Staff # 17) on 05/21/24 at 01:07 PM, he was asked about what the resident bathroom call system configuration consisted of in the facility. Staff #17 confirmed he is new to the facility, some of them have strings, some have chains, and he was not familiar with call systems. He stated he would have to ask the nurses, he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a handrail was secure. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 5 handrails tested during the annual survey. The findings include: During an observation on 05/16/2024 at 10:08 AM, the surveyor observed that the handrail to the left of the 1C Bath door was lose on the wall. The Maintenance Director was shown where the rail was loose from the wall on 05/16/2024 at 10:15 AM. The Maintenance Director stated he would fix it right away. The Administrator was shown the loose handrail on 05/16/2024 at 12:23 PM. She stated they would get it repaired as soon as possible. The surveyor and the Administrator observed that the handrail was tighter but still loose on 05/31/2024 at 8:57 AM. The Administrator called the Maintenance Director who stated he would fix it right away. The Administrator showed the surveyor at 05/31/2024 at 9:09 AM that the siderail was secure and stated the Maintenance Director was inspecting the remaining siderails in the building.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by the presence of a pest in the hallway. This was found to be evident for the 1B hallway. The findings include: On 05/15/2024 at 7:46 AM, the surveyor and GNA #2 observed a cockroach crawl up the wall and behind a picture outside of room B130. The surveyor pointed to the wall and asked what's that? GNA #2 responded, That's a cockroach crawling up the wall. She further stated, we do see cockroaches here and there. More upstairs than down. The residents upstairs have more stuff in their rooms because they are long term. The surveyor asked if she had seen any other pests and GNA #2 stated, I have never seen any mice or other pests. On 05/15/2024 at 11:30 AM, the Administrator informed the surveyor that the pest management company would be coming to do an additional treatment that day. The surveyor observed the pest management company treating the facility on 05/15/2024 at 1:29 PM.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess a resident. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #96) out of 62 residents reviewed during an annual and complaint survey. The findings include: On 5/15/24 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #96's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #96 was admitted to the facility in late February 2023 and had a past medical history of, but not limited to, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, seizures, and cerebral infarction (stroke). The surveyor further reviewed the hospital admission history and physical dated January 31st 2023. In the assessment and plan section seizures were listed. It further stated seizures resulted from an anterior cerebral artery (aca) stroke. The plan further stated, continue home lamotrigine 150 mg twice daily (a medication prescribed to prevent seizures) and sertraline 75 mg daily (a medication prescribed to treat depression). On 5/22/24 at 12:04 PM, the surveyor reviewed the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #96. The review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to accurately dispense and record medications as per scheduled ordered time. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #103) of 5 Residents reviewed for pain management. The finding include: On 5/14/24 at 11:41 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #103's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #103 was admitted in early November 2022. Further review revealed that Resident #103 was prescribed a pain medication, oxycodone, on 11/3/22. The order was for oxycodone 5 mg every 6 hours as needed for pain. In review of the progress note dated, 11/7/22, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff #30 wrote; Resident continues to complain of pain to his/her right knee. It further stated the Medical Director evaluated Resident #103 and wrote orders for routine oxycodone to be given at 7 AM along with the as needed oxycodone. On 5/15/24 at 7:56 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #103's Medication Administration Record (MAR). The review revealed that oxycodone 5 mg was scheduled to be given at 8 AM starting 11/8/22.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARYLAND LONG TERM CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/18/2016 |
| GROFIC, BARRY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/02/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $464K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215350. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.