Allegany Health Nursing And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 258 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 124 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 153 beds and averages 115.1 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a facility-reported incident, a closed medical record and all pertinent information and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to identify a newly admitted Resident who was admitted without clear physician's order for end-of-life care and failed to follow the facility policy to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). This was evident for 1 (Resident #902) of 11 facility-reported incidents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident and prior to the start of this survey. The facilities plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of [DATE]. The findings include: Review of facility-reported incident (FRI) MD00174662 on [DATE] revealed allegations that Resident #902 was admitted to the facility from the community on [DATE] at 1:15 PM. Resident #902 was being evaluated in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a facility-reported incident, a closed medical record and all pertinent information, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and follow the resident's plan of care to: 1) prevent a fractured humerus during a transfer, and 2) to prevent a cognitively and functionally impaired resident from sliding out of bed onto the floor and receiving bilateral fractured hips. This was evident for 2 (Residents #909, #906) out of 11 facility-reported incidents resulting in harm to both residents reviewed during the survey. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident and prior to the start of this survey. The facilities plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of 07/11/23. The findings include: 1) A review of the facility-reported incident MD00178281 was reviewed on 01/23/2025 at 1 PM. The facility's investigation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected a resident's current status. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #28) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.The findings include:The Minimum Date Set (MDS) is a complete assessment of the Resident that provides the facility with the information needed to develop a care plan, deliver the appropriate care and services, and modify the care plan based on the Resident's status. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed a wound specialist note, dated 3/11/26, that documented the presence of an unstageable deep tissue injury (DTI) on the resident's right lateral foot. A DTI is a pressure injury resulting from intense and or prolonged pressure and shear forces at the bone-muscle interface. It presents as intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, or purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an interdisciplinary care plan meeting was held to review and revise the resident's care plan after the completion of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #6) out of two resident's reviewed for urinary catheter use.The findings include: Care Conferences, also known as care plan meetings, are interdisciplinary team meetings that are to occur following the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. The MDS is a complete assessment of the Resident that provides the facility with the information needed to develop a care plan, deliver the appropriate care and services, and modify the care plan based on the Resident's status. On 3/31/26 at 2:19 PM social worker (SW) #6 was interviewed in regard to the process for scheduling care plan meetings. SW #6 reported that the MDS nurses send out a schedule and that social work usually schedules the meeting 14 days after the assessment date. She went on to report that there is documentation of these…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provision of activities to meet the needs of residents with dementia. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #122 and #9) out of 5 residents reviewed for dementia care.The findings include1.Review of Resident 122's medical record revealed the resident has resided at the facility for more than 6 months, was legally blind and had dementia. The resident resided on the secured unit, in which a code was required to gain access to the elevator to leave the unit. On 3/30/26 at 11:09 AM Resident #122 was observed ambulating in the hallway, dressed for the day. There was no formal activity occurring at this time on the nursing unit.On 3/30/26 at 12:40 PM, Resident #122 was observed standing in his/her room alone, leaning over the foot of the bed. Surveyor did not observe the television or music to be on in the resident's room. On 3/31/26 at 1:39 PM, observation made on Resident #122's unit failed to reveal an organized activity at this time. Resident #122 was not in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the resident's needs related to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter and failed to ensure that a resident was assessed for the possible removal of the urinary catheter. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #6) out of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter usage.The findings include:On 4/1/26 review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the resident has resided at the facility for more than a year and was sent to the hospital in late December 2025. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for the December discharge to the hospital revealed the resident was frequently incontinent of urine (unable to control their bladder) and did not have an internal or external urinary catheter in place. The resident was re-admitted to the facility from the hospital in early January 2026.An internal urinary catheter is a medical device consisting of a tube…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were evaluated for competence. This was evident for 2 of 2 Registered Nurses (Staff #11, #13) employee files reviewed for skills and competency.The findings include: On 04/02/26 at 10:25 AM an interview was conducted with the Human Resources Coordinator (Staff #19). When asked how staff performance was monitored she said that this was done annually and that she gave a form to the Director of Nursing (DON) who would then give them to the corresponding unit manager and that the form included a section for skills/competencies. She was then asked to provide employee files for 2 Registered Nurses (Staff #11, Staff #13). On 4/02/26 at 10:47 AM an interview was conducted with the DON and a review of Nurse #13's employee file was done together but the review failed to reveal any skills/competency for the nurse. The DON said Nurse #13 was part time and was hired only to do wound care, so she may not have had a skills checklist done. During the interview the Facility Assessment was also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) had their performance evaluated. This was evident for 2 (Staff #14, #15) of 2 GNAs reviewed for performance evaluation.The findings include: On 4/01/26 another surveyor requested the employee files for Staff #14 and Staff #15.On 4/02/26 at 9:08 AM a review of the employee files for Staff #14 and Staff #15 failed to reveal any evidence that they had performance evaluations.On 4/02/26 at 3:57 PM an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing and she confirmed the deficiency that the facility did not complete performance evaluations for either Staff #14 or Staff #15.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accuracy and integrity of controlled substance reconciliation records. This deficient practice was identified in 1(3rd floor south cart) of 3 medication storage areas observed. The findings include: On 04/02/26 at 11:45 AM, during an observation of the 3rd floor medication storage room and 3rd floor south medication cart, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16 provided the narcotic count verification sheet utilized for shift-to-shift reconciliation of controlled medications. Review of the narcotic reconciliation documentation revealed the following: The 6:00 AM shift reconciliation for 04/02/26 contained signatures of two licensed nurses; however, there was no documented evidence that an actual count of controlled medications was performed, including: total number of narcotic blister pack cards total number of medication bottles, including refrigerated medications total number of transdermal patches The reconciliation record did not demonstrate that controlled substances were verified by two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of clinical records, specifically the electronic medication administration record (eMAR). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #15) of 3 resident medication administration observations. The findings include: On 04/01/26 at 9:30 AM, during a medication administration observation, Registered Nurse (RN) #11 was observed preparing to administer medications to Resident #15.Resident #15 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, Repeated falls, and Muscle weakness. Resident #15 had an order for amantadine, a dopaminergic medication used to manage symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Failure to administer this medication as ordered may result in increased rigidity, decreased mobility, and impaired functional status. Review of the resident's eMAR revealed that the resident's amantadine HCl 100 mg, scheduled for 8:00 AM, was documented as administered.On 04/01/26 at 9:32 AM, during the observation, RN #11 confirmed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to use infection prevention strategies. This was found to be evident during two out of two observation of the laundry facility; the review of the water management plan to prevent Legionella; and review of one (Resident #16) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care.The findings include: 1) On 3/31/26 at 1:13 PM an observation of the facility laundry rooms was conducted. A laundry aide (Staff #10) was observed as she held and folded a flat sheet which touched the floor as she held it up to fold it. There was a metal table in the room that was partially covered with supplies, and about 3 feet of the table was clear. The overall table length appeared to be shorter than the length of the flat sheet that was being folded. When interviewed, Staff #10, described the process for sorting, washing, drying, folding, storing and stocking linens for the facility. When she described how she sorted dirty linens and how she placed dirty linens in the washer, she said she wore gloves but did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the call system was accessible to meet resident needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #46) of 1 residents observed for call system accessibility. The findings include: On 03/30/2026 at 11:22 AM, Resident #46 motioned for the surveyor to enter the room while holding a nasal cannula and requested assistance to place it back on. At that time, the surveyor observed that no call bell was within Resident #46's reach, and further observation of the room revealed the call bell was located on the floor under Resident #46's bed.On 03/20/26 at 11:26 AM, after the surveyor stood in the doorway to obtain staff attention, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #17, who identified themselves as the assigned staff member for Resident #46, entered the room and retrieved the call bell from under Resident #46's bed. GNA #17 stated they had previously placed the call bell within the resident's reach on the bed during their last check of Resident #46. GNA #17 further indicated the call bell was not clipped, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,636 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-01-24
• $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $557K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD