No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Restore Health Rehabilitation Center

4615 Einstein Place, White Plains, MD 20695 · For profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (240) 448-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 20221 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
10583 Theodore Green Blvd · (301) 934-9300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4453 Crain Hwy · (240) 448-3679 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Shoppers1.9 mi
1170 Smallwood Dr W · (301) 298-1785 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(301) 645-2617 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased43.0%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.6%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.5%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened49.9%22.2%16.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.4%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.5%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.8%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.4%25.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.4%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.6%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.0%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.0%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.591.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.591.201.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 407 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
16.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 127 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.2%CMS range 60.7–71.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF16.6%CMS range 13.8–19.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified76.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened12.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 5.5–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
1.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
36.2%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 68.2 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.58 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-30)
23
at the previous standard inspection (2022-09-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-09-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of medical record documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and effective system for securing medication, treatment supplies, and hazardous medical equipment in their designated carts on nursing units with residents with documented cognitive deficits and wandering behaviors. This practice was noted on 8/31/22 and included five (5) medication/treatment carts that were observed unlocked and unattended. The facility's failure to secure medications and treatment supplies was evident throughout the facility's two (2) nursing units. The deficient practice was observed on 4 out of 4 medication carts and 1 of 3 treatment carts. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that 2. medications and biologicals were labeled with and dated after opened and medications stored in medication storage areas were unexpired. This was evident for 2 out of 3 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication storage room and 3. ensure that resident nasal cannulas…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and safe positioning during activities of daily living (ADL) care for a dependent resident who required staff assistance with bed mobility. This deficient practice was determined to be past noncompliance that resulted in the resident falling from the bed during care and sustaining multiple fractures for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #7). Findings:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including fracture of right humerus, chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, anemia, hypertension, chronic pain, obesity, and osteoarthritis.Review conducted on 3/31/26 at 5:46 PM of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], completed by the MDS Coordinator, revealed that Resident #7 was cognitively intact (BIMS score of 15) and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene.Review conducted on 3/31/26 at 5:46 PM of the same MDS assessment, completed by the MDS Coordinator, revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report (1.) misappropriation of residents' property and (2.) an injury of unknown origin to the state agency. This was evident for 2 (Resident #78 and #91) out of 2 residents who were reviewed for reporting during the recertification survey.The findings include: 1. On 06/22/2026 at 9:37 AM, an interview with Resident #78 was conducted. They reported that they had lost a ring while at the facility about a month ago. The ring was worth about $680. On 06/23/2026 at 11:10, an interview with Staff #3, Activities Director and facility Administrator was conducted. They confirmed that they were aware that Resident #78's ring was lost. They further reported that upon the facility's internal investigation, they found out that the ring was given to a facility staff member who had left with the ring to go shopping but never came back with it. The facility's administrator stated that the resident's property should not have left the facility. On 06/23/2026 at 1:19 PM, a review of the internal investigation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of residents by failing to ensure complete and thorough bathing and hygiene care and failing to provide an alternative method for showering when residents were unable to use a shower chair, for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #9, Resident #10, and Resident #17).Findings: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, bipolar disorder, hypertension, polyneuropathy, low back pain, muscle spasm, dementia, hypothyroidism, chronic pain, hyperlipidemia, GERD, and anxiety. Review conducted on 4/1/26 at 11:00 AM of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #10 was cognitively intact and dependent on shower/bathe (the ability to bathe self including washing, rinsing, and drying self; excludes washing of back and hair and does not include transferring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that resident records were accurate and reflected the care and services provided, by documenting that showers were provided when staff interviews revealed that showers were not performed, for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #9 and Resident #17).Findings included:Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia, polyneuropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hypertension, pain, depression, and atrial fibrillation.Review conducted on 4/2/26 at 12:52 PM of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #17 was moderately impaired and dependent on shower/bathe self (the ability to bathe self, including washing, rinsing, and drying self; excludes washing of back and hair and does not include transferring in and out of tub/shower).Review conducted on 4/2/26 at 12:54 PM of the care plan initiated on 5/18/25 indicated that Resident #17 had limited ability to transfer self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with staff and Residents and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for Residents. This finding was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #21, #51, #54, and #61) out of 7 Residents reviewed for the development and implementation of comprehensive care plans. The findings include: 1. In an interview with Resident #51 on 6/16/2025 at 11:49 AM, the Resident stated that he/she had one fall in the bathroom a few weeks ago. The Resident stated that he/she had pain in both knees and received pain patches for the knee pain. The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #51's medical record on 6/18/2025 at 11:15 AM. Record review revealed a progress note that Resident #51 had a fall on 5/27/2025 at 4:00 PM when Resident attempted to transfer self from toilet to wheelchair and lost balance. Additionally, review of Resident #51's care plan revealed that Resident did not have a comprehensive care plan developed or implemented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide privacy to a resident during the administration of a subcutaneous injection. This was evident in 1 (Resident #54) of 1 resident observed for injection administration. The findings include: A review of Resident #54's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Dementia and Diabetes Mellitus. On 06/16/2025 at 10:10 AM the surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) #2 administer medications to Resident #54. The medications included Heparin 5,000 units to be administered by subcutaneous injection twice a day. During the observation, RN#2 failed to provide privacy to the resident while administering the Heparin injection. After going into Resident #54's room, RN#2 did not close the door or pull the privacy curtain. RN#2 informed the resident that she was going to administer a Heparin injection, then pulled up the resident's hospital-type gown and administered the injection to the right side of the resident's abdomen. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews with Residents and staff and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Resident's care plans were revised and updated timely. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #51 and #54) out of 2 Residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The findings include: The surveyor toured the nursing unit on 6/16/2025 at 8:44 AM and observed Resident #51 in his/her room in the wheelchair. The Resident stated that he/she had a fall in the bathroom when he/she attempted to transfer from the toilet to the wheelchair and lost balance and had pain in both knees a few weeks ago. A record review was conducted by the surveyor on 6/18/2025 at 11:15 AM of Resident #51's medical record. Record review of the progress notes revealed that Resident #51 had a fall on 5/27/2025 at 4:00 PM when Resident attempted to transfer self from toilet to wheelchair and lost balance. Bilateral knee x-rays were performed which revealed no fractures. Additionally, review of Resident #51's care plan revealed that Resident had a care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the posted nurse staffing information was accurate and current. This finding was found to be evident in the review of sufficient and competent Nurse staffing. The findings include: The facility's staffing data document may be a form or spreadsheet, and all the required information displayed clearly and in a visible place. The information should be displayed in a prominent place that was readily accessible to residents, staff, and visitors and presented in a clear and readable format. This information posted must be up-to-date and current. The facility must post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. The facility must ensure staffing information was accurate and current. At 1:20 PM on 6/18/2025 the surveyor observed in the facility lobby on the receptionist desk the posted nurse staffing information in a clear standing frame. The date that was indicated on the posted nurse staffing information form was 6/17/2025. In an interview with employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner that ensures food safety. This was evident in 1 out of 2 dining areas observed during the survey. The findings include: During an observation of the Refrigerator in the [NAME] Oak Dining Room on 6/16/25 at 8:12 AM there were food containers found that were expired and that had no name or date. These foods included: A disposable plastic food container for Resident #51 dated 6/11/25 A plate of salad without a date made or date placed into the refrigerator A plastic container of food with no name or date written on it Two containers with a room number but no date A plastic bag of food for Resident #61 with no date A plastic bag of food with no name or date During an interview with the Director of Dining Services on 6/16/25 at 8:18 AM he reported the refrigerator was for Residents to store food brought into the facility. He advised anything put into the refrigerator should be labeled fully with the name of the Resident and the date that the item was put inside. He reported items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Record Reviews, Observations and Interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate. This was evident for 2 (Resident #61, #46) out of 5 Residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records. The findings include: 1. During a medical record review on 6/18/25 at 9:23 AM it was discovered that Resident #46 had an order for a Pressure relieving Mattress present on bed for skin integrity protection that was ordered on 3/28/25 and an Air Mattress for pressure relieving to wounds every shift that was ordered on 5/01/25. During a review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #46 it was discovered that the order for the Pressure Relieving Mattress and the order for Air Mattress was documented as being completed from 6/01/25 to 6/20/25. During an observation of Resident #46 with LPN #16 on 6/20/25 at 10:52 AM she confirmed the Resident dId not have an air mattress but dId have a pressure relieving mattress. During an interview with the Unit Manager for the Sycamore Unit on 6/20/25 at 11:04 AM she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration. This was evident in 1 (Resident #40) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. The findings include: A review of Resident #40's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Hypertension and Myocardial Infraction. On 06/16/2025 at 09:45 AM during a medication administration observation, the surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) #2 take Resident #40's Blood Pressure. RN #2 reported the Blood Pressure as 137/80 then walked to the medication cart and wrote the Blood Pressure down on paper. RN #2 unlocked the medication cart and proceeded to dispense the resident's medication without performing hand hygiene. The surveyor intervened and asked about hand hygiene. RN #2 then performed hand hygiene using hand sanitizer solution. Later, at around 09:50 AM while RN #2 was dispensing medications, a visitor walked up to the medication cart. RN #2 conversed and shook hands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a functional and sanitary environment. This was found evident in 1 out of 2 dining areas observed during the survey. The findings include: During observations on 6/16/25 at 8:14 AM it was discovered that a non-operating ice and water dispenser was on top of the counter in the Sycamore Café. Further observation revealed the cabinet below the dispenser was missing the handle to the right door. The floor inside the cabinet was broken into pieces and crumbled in the center. The interior of the cabinet had brownish stains running down the walls and on the broken flooring. A broken pipe was found inside the cabinet. During an observation and interview with the Director of Maintenance on 6/17/25 at 2:12 PM he reported that he had been employed with the facility for about four and a half months. He advised he was not aware of the damaged cabinet and described the crumbled flooring as pressed wood. During an interview with the Administrator on 6/17/25 at 2:21 PM she advised the cabinet had been like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and an investigation into a complaint, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of suspected resident abuse to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This finding was evident for 1 (#166) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. This finding is related to complaint #MD00185506. The findings include: The Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) is the agency within the Maryland Department of Health charged with monitoring the quality of care in Maryland's health care facilities and community-based programs. Allegations of abuse are to be reported to the Office of Healthcare Quality in a timely manner. A review of complaint intake MD00185506 on 6/30/2025 revealed that on 11/10/2022, Resident #166 alleged that staff members washed him/her in a rough manner while providing assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care. A review of Resident#166's clinical record on 06/30/2025 at 11:18AM revealed a nursing progress note dated 11/10/2022 at 2:02 PM which stated Resident refused to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility staff interview and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an alleged violation of abuse. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #187) out of 1 Resident that was reviewed for investigation of an alleged violation of abuse. The findings include: The Office of Healthcare Quality (OHCQ) received a facility reported incident (FRI)/self-report on 6/29/2023 at 8:56 AM from the facility's Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) for an allegation of Resident abuse (family to Resident) - Intake#MD00193872. Resident #187 was linked to the Intake#MD00193872. The surveyor requested the facility investigation file for the facility reported incident (FRI) for Resident #187 on 6/17/2025 at 7:15 AM from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator/ED (LNHA/ED). In an interview with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator/Executive Director (LNHA/ED) on 6/17/2025 later in the day, she stated that she was unable to locate an investigation file for this facility reported incident (FRI) for Resident #187, but that she would continue to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility staff interviews and surveyor review of a facility reported incident and a complaint, it was determined that facility failed to provide written notice to the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of a Resident's discharge, and failed to ensure that a discharge summary was completed by a Resident's physician. This finding was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #62 and #171) out of 3 residents reviewed for discharge process during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 12:15 PM, a review of Resident #62's clinical record revealed that Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #62's electronic clinical record revealed no documentation that the local ombudsman was notified of the resident's discharge from the facility. On [DATE] at 03:01 PM, an interview conducted with the Administrator revealed that discharge notices are sent to the ombudsman via email each time a resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to initiate wound care upon admission for a Resident with Pressure Ulcers. This was evident for 1 (Resident #191) out of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the survey. The findings include: A pressure ulcer (also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer) is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater), Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), and Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone, or tendon). Deep Tissue Injuries (DTIs) are characterized by intact skin that is discolored (purple or maroon) or a blood-filled blister, indicating damage to underlying soft tissue due to pressure or shear. DTIs are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — widespread
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' medications were documented at the time of administration, including high risk medications, resulting in a consistent and widespread pattern of medications being documented inaccurately and hours after they were due. This involved multiple staff on all shifts and on both units. This was evident for 5 (Residents #21, #61, #35, #25, and #73) out of 5 residents reviewed in detail for timely medication administration but was also noted in every medication administraion record (MAR) seen during the survey. This practice has the potential to impact all residents. Documentation is an integral part of medication administration. Documentation communicates the timing, dosing, and effect of any and all medications received by a patient. In the setting of skilled nursing care, residents are often prescribed multiple medications for significant medical conditions. They are also often more vulnerable to medication error and more prone to changes in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and review of resident medical records and interview with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to: 1) provide for timely and accurate documentation of residents' administered medications. This was evident for 5 (Residents #21, #61, #35, #25, and #73) out of 5 residents reviewed for timely administration of medications. 2) provide sufficient staff to care for residents. This is evident for 2 out of 2 complaints (Resident # 95 and # 81), 3) to answer the call bell in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 6 (resident #5, #35, #49, #57, 208 and #309) out of 20 residents observed for call bell response time during the Annual Survey, and 4) have the required number of nursing staff to care for residents resulting in delayed resident care and documentation of care. This was found to be true for 2 out of 2 units. This practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: Surveyors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview with facility staff and observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain consistent and accurate documentation in the residents' medical records related to care, notification and behaviors respectively. This was evident in 4 of 70 medical records (#99, 95, 26, and #29) reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) Surveyor reviewed Resident #99's medical record on 9/21/2022 at 9:23 AM secondary to complaints that s/he was not given the appropriate meals during his/her stay at the facility. Record review at that time revealed diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), following a cerebral infarction (stroke, when blood flow is disrupted to the brain). The Physician orders initiated on admission noted for Resident #99 Eating with assist of one, patient is a feeder. Additionally, noted a week later an order was entered to Assist patient with eating during mealtime. A review of the Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) point of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection as evidenced by: 1) lack screening for visitors upon entrance to the facility and 2) staff did not wear face mask appropriately. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 1 staff members observed during a facility tour and 4 out of 4 surveyors upon entrance to the facility. The findings include: COVID-19 spreads when an infected person breathes out droplets and very small particles that contain the virus. These droplets and particles can be breathed in by other people or land on their eyes, noses, or mouth. In some circumstances, they may contaminate surfaces they touch. Wearing a well-fitting mask that covers your nose and mouth will help protect yourself and others. 1) On 8/31/2022 6 AM surveyors entered the facility and were not accurately screened by facility staff for sign and symptoms of COVID-19. Surveyors observed facility staff members stationed at the entrance on the [NAME] Oak Unit, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-21 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to designate at least one Infection Preventionist who is responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. This was evident during the Infection Control portion of the recertification survey. An interview held with the Interim ADON/IP (Assistant Director of Nursing/ Infection Preventionist), RN#3, on 8/30/2022 at 10:00 AM stated that she started working at the facility two weeks prior to the beginning of the survey and is assisting with the IP role during her time at this facility. On 9/12/2022 at 8:45 AM an interview was held with the Human Resources (HR) Director, Staff #50, revealed that the previous IP's, RN #61, last day worked was 5/19/2022. An interview held with Clinical Consultant, RN #14, and the Administrator on 9/12/2022 10:30 AM revealed that when RN #61 resigned on 5/19/2022, part- time RN #63 assisted with the responsibilities of the IP role. Once RN #63 left, the IP role remained vacant and various RN staff members would assist in completing IP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-21 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure that each resident or responsible party (RP) received education regarding benefits and risk and document that the residents or the responsible party were provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza and pneumococcal immunization and 2) that the resident either received the influenza immunization or did not receive the influenza immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for immunization. The findings include: On 9/21/2022 9 AM the facility influenza immunization policy and procedure was reviewed and revealed the following: all patients/residents will be offered the influenza vaccine when it becomes available upon admission during the vaccine season, October 1 through March 31 and each year after .Documentation in the record should include: a) Education provided concerning the risks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the dignity of a resident as evidenced by the resident's uncovered urine catheter bag lying on the floor uncovered, under the resident's bed. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #20) out of 13 residents observed during a tour of the nursing unit. The findings include: During a tour of the nursing unit on 8/30/2022 at 10:37 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #20's urine catheter bag lying flat on the floor, uncovered, under Resident #20's bed in plain view to be seen by anyone walking the hallways or entering the resident's room. During an interview held with Resident #20, the resident asked the surveyor if the floor was wet and advised the surveyor to be careful of the slippery floor because the night shift GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) had spilled urine from the bag when emptying at the end of the shift. Resident #20 could not recall the identity of the GNA. During an observation and interview on 8/30/2022 at 10:45 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 and LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical record, interview with resident representatives and facility staff, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure that Resident #96's shower preferences were obtained at the beginning of his/her stay; and 2) failed to have access to the facility's communication system. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #96) of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) and 2 out of 20 residents (Resident #26, and #44) reviewed during the annual survey. The evidence includes: 1) The surveyor interviewed Resident #96's responsible party (RP) on 9/19/22 at 11:13 AM. During the interview, the RP indicated that Resident #96 was never given a shower during their 30+ day stay. The surveyor reviewed Resident #96's medical record on 9/19/22 at 11:18 AM. The review revealed that Resident #96 was admitted to the facility from mid-April to late-May 2022, with diagnoses that included anemia, unsteadiness, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. The resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical record and interview with facility staff and residents' representatives, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians and residents' representatives were notified when the resident sustained a change in condition. This was evident for 2 (Resident #75 and #7) of 10 residents reviewed for change in condition. The findings include: 1)The surveyor interviewed Resident #75's responsible party (RP) on 9/14/22 at 11:00 AM. During the interview, the RP stated that the resident was not capable of making decisions and that the resident's family should have been informed of all changes in the resident's condition. The RP stated that the resident's family had never been notified of swelling in the resident's hand or of pressure ulcers that developed during the resident's stay. The surveyor reviewed Resident #75's medical record on 9/14/22 at 12:20 PM. The review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility from late December, 2019, to the end of January, 2020, with diagnoses that include urinary tract infection,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview and review of pertinent facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent incidents of abuse and neglect. This was evident during the review of 2 of 19 abuse investigations, including complaints and facility reported incidents. The findings include: 1) Surveyor reviewed an allegation of neglect reported to the state agency from a family that their loved one, Resident #100, was left soiled for hours. In addition, the facility also completed an investigation into the neglect allegation. The facility investigation reviewed by the surveyor on 9/09/2022 at 8:24 AM included witness statements stating observing Resident #100 soiled and wet around 12:30 PM, notified geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) staff #100 and Resident #100 was still wet on follow up around 6:00 PM. GNA Staff #32 was interviewed by the facility Administrator regarding the allegation of leaving Resident #100 soiled for an extended period on 4/21/2022. When GNA #32 was asked to sign 'corrective action form' the Administrator documented that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to timely report investigations to the Survey Agency, which is the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) within 24 hours of an alleged incident and the final report within 5 working days. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #26, and #54) out of 19 residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) A record review of the Nurse Practitioner's (NP) #60 progress note for Resident #26 was conducted on 09/09/2022 at 9:17 AM. The NP's note dated 01/14/2022 stated Xrays were done, revealed ligament injury. Further review of the Resident #26's medical records did not reveal documentation of the ligament injury. On 09/09/2022 at 9:33 AM a review of the Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (SBAR) communication form dated 01/14/2022 stated left wrist pain, splint on left wrist and ice for 10 mins TID (three times a day) for one week due to Xray result. On 09/09/2022 at 9:47 AM a review of the physician order stated apply ice to left wrist for 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, administrative record review and review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) investigation documentation it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents of alleged physical abuse and allegations of neglect. This was evident for 3 out 19 residents (Resident #26, #24 and #70) reviewed for abuse. The findings: 1a) Review of Facility Report Incident for Resident #26 on 08/31/2022 at 10:55 AM revealed that the Administrator was notified by the Charge Nurse /License Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 that an X-Ray was ordered for Resident #26 because the Charge Nurse observed swelling on her right ankle. The review of the facility's investigation did not include interviews for the other residents and staff on the nursing unit to determine if someone witnessed the injury. During an interview conducted on 08/31/2022 at 11:19 AM, the Surveyor advised the Administrator that the investigation did not include resident and staff interviews and therefore was incomplete. The Administrator advised s/he would see if there were any more documentation including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of recent facility discharge practices and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents and or their representative (RP) with the proper paper documentation of the facilities bed hold policy. This was evident for 3 of 3 (#24, 67 and 74) resident records reviewed regarding unexpected hospitalizations. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #24 on 8/31/2022 at 10:07 AM regarding a complaint revealed a hospitalization following a fall on 5/3/2022. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation from the facility that they provided timely notification to the family regarding the bed hold notice. Interview on 9/8/2022 with staff # 57, the Admissions Director, at 11:59 AM, revealed that there was no notification to the family when a resident is sent out to the hospital regarding the bed hold policy (A bed hold is when a nursing home holds a bed for you when you go into the hospital). She further stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review, review of facility reported incidents and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure that care plans were revised as required. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #49 and #69) out of 20 residents reviewed for Care Plans during the Annual Survey. The findings include: 1) During an interview conducted on 08/31/2022 at 11:58 AM, the Surveyor observed bruises on Resident #49 right forearm. The resident stated the bruises were caused by an anticoagulant that had been prescribed. Anticoagulants are medicines that help prevent blood clots. They're given to people at a high risk of getting clots, to reduce their chances of developing serious conditions such as strokes and heart attacks. Lovenox (enoxaparin sodium) Injection is an anticoagulant (blood thinner) used to prevent blood clots. On 08/31/2022 at 12:19 PM a review of the physician ordered revealed an order for Lovenox (enoxaparin) syringe; 40 mg/0.4 mL; amount to administer: 40mg sub [subcutaneous] q [once] nightly for prophylaxis (an attempt to prevent disease).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident with identified assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) as identified in the resident's care plans. This was evident for 2 of 3 (#73, 74) residents reviewed for ADL's. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #73 on 9/13/2022 at 1:37 PM revealed admission to the facility with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness, lack of coordination and need for assistance with personal care. Secondary to a complaint, Resident #73's ADL's and physician orders were reviewed. The physician orders revealed a general order set from admission that Resident #73 required the assistance of one person for eating and toileting. Review of the ADL documentation from Geriatric Nursing staff for support provided to Resident #73 from 2/11/2020-3/11/2020 revealed that of 90 opportunities to aid with eating, staff only documented help 18 times and documented that s/he was independent in eating 28 times. This concern was reviewed with staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure ordered splints were in place, 2) failed to administer a medication as ordered by the physcian. This was evident for 2 (Resident #24 and #42) of 19 residents reviewed for neglect during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) Surveyor completed initial tours of the facility and multiple observations of Resident #24 on 8/30/2022. During these observations Resident #24 was observed up in his/her wheelchair without any noticeable splints or braces in place. Medical record review for Resident #24 on 8/31/2022 at 10:09 AM revealed multiple diagnosis including hemiplegia (Muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) post cerebral vascular accident (stroke) affecting left dominant side, dysphagia, unspecified dementia without behaviors and chronic pain. Further Resident #24's physician orders were reviewed and noted the following; a. Ensure brace (a device fitted to something, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical record, it was determined that the facility failed to intervene when a newly identified stage 2 pressure ulcer was found on Resident #75's skin. This was evident for 1 (Resident #75) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: The surveyor interviewed Resident #75's responsible party (RP) on 9/14/22 at 11:00 AM. During the interview, the RP stated that the resident was discharged from the facility at the end of January, 2020, to a hospital due to a change in the resident's condition. The RP further stated that, at the hospital, the resident was diagnosed with stage 2 pressure ulcers on both buttocks. The RP claimed that the facility never contacted family regarding any skin condition that the resident developed at the facility. The RP noted that the resident was not capable of making decisions and that the resident's family should have been informed of all changes in the resident's condition. The surveyor reviewed Resident #75's medical record on 9/14/22 at 12:20 PM. The review revealed that the resident was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to address a significant weight loss for a resident. This was evident for 3 (Residents #76, #42 and #55) of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: 1) The surveyor interviewed the responsible party (RP) for Resident #76 on 9/20/22 at 1:16 PM. During the interview, the RP stated that the resident had lost 50 lbs while at the facility and that it was never addressed by the facility. The surveyor reviewed Resident #76's medical record on 9/20/22 at 1:18 PM. The review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility from February to May, 2020, with diagnoses that included orthopedic care, anemia, kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and high blood pressure. During the review, the surveyor examined all of the weights obtained by the facility for the resident. They were as follows: - 2/14/20: 232 lbs - 4/9/20: 230 lbs - 5/5/20: 184 lbs - 5/7/20: 187 lbs - 5/11/20: 209…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to establish and made understood the roles and responsibilities for the Nurses functioning in the role of Director of Nursing (DON) in their absence. The findings include: During an interview with the Administrator on 09/08/22 at 11:17 AM. S/he revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) had been on an extended leave since July 2022. In their absence, s/he along with Registered Nurses (RN) #3 and #2 shared the DON responsibilities. The Administrator added it was a combined effort, and the RNs were aware of their specific roles and duties. An interview was conducted with RN #3 and RN #2 on 09/08/22 at 11:55 AM. RN #3 and RN #2 identified themselves as Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and assigned to work on the Sycamore and [NAME] Oak Units. RN # 3 stated they were contracted for a limited time to work at the facility. RN #2 stated that they began training as an ADON 4 weeks prior. The RNs were asked what specific duties traditionally assigned to the DON that they were responsible to perform in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of medication administration, interview with facility staff, and review of medication administration records and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to have a medication administration rate of less than 5 percent during the medication administration facility task. Out of 26 observed medications administered, 2 medications were split by a soiled communal pill cutter, resulting in an error rate of 7.96%. This involved 2 of 4 residents (Resident #208 and Resident #7), 1 of 1 Certified Medication Aide (CMA) and 1 of 2 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #7) that were observed. The findings include: 1) On 9/1/22 at 8:14 AM, the surveyor observed CMA #43 administrating medications to Resident #208. CMA #43 obtained a pill cutter from the top of the medication cart. The pill cutter had a white powder substance noted in the chamber where pills are placed to be split. CMA #43 used the pill cutter to cut one of Resident #208's metoprolol tablets (a medication used for blood pressure). During an interview with CMA #43 on 9/1/22 at approximately 8:30 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, review of other pertinent documentation and survey findings, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that effective quality assessment and assurance performance improvement policies and procedures were implemented to ensure deficiencies were not repeated and residents remained in a safe, enriching, and comfortable environment. This was found to be evident during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: The facility's previous annual survey conducted on 12/2018 found the facility cited for deficiencies including representative notification, resident/representative notification of the bed hold notice and care plan revisions. Additionally, a focused infection control survey (FIC) was conducted on 2/2022 citing concerns with infection control practices and medical records within the facility. During this year's annual survey conducted from 8/30/2022 through 9/21/2022 again found the same deficiencies affecting a pattern (both units, not all shifts) of residents including related to staffing and the repeated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, review of other pertinent documentation and survey findings, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that effective quality assessment and assurance performance improvement interventions were implemented to address identified quality deficiencies. This was found to be evident during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: The facility's previous annual survey conducted on 12/2018 found the facility cited for deficiencies including representative notification, resident/representative notification of the bed hold notice and care plan revisions. Additionally, a focused infection control survey (FIC) was conducted on 2/2022 citing concerns with infection control practices and medical records within the facility. During this year's annual survey conducted from 8/30/2022 through 9/21/2022 again found the same deficiencies affecting a pattern of residents. The Surveyor reviewed the facilities Quality Assurance Program (QAPI) plan with the facility Administrator on 9/20/22 at 1:26 PM. Although there is a QAPI plan in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-12-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical records and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to do a monthly medication review on Resident #3 and Resident #6's medications. This was evident for 2 out of 5 residents investigated for unnecessary medications during the survey process. The findings include: On 12/17/18 around 02:47 PM, Resident #3's medication orders were reviewed for unnecessary medications. It was noted that there were no pharmacy reviews documented for October, November, and December 2018. The Sycamore Unit nurse stated that the Pharmacist was in the facility in December. There was no documentation related to the visit. On 12/17/18 around 04:19 PM, the writer reviewed Resident #6's medical record for unnecessary medications. It was, also, noted that there were no monthly medication reviews documented since the month of September 2018.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff and responsible party interviews, it was determined the nursing staff failed to notify the designated responsible party of changes in Resident # 47's condition during a hospital transfer. This was evident in 1 out of 29 residents reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: The facility admission record face sheet is a document that provides the facility staff with contact information about who to contact in the event of any change in physical or mental conditions involving each resident, in the event of a medical emergency. Surveyor's review of Complaint #MD00134006 revealed concerns that Resident #47's Responsible Party (family member) alleged that he/she was not notified by the facility of the physical changes in the resident's condition in a timely manner. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility with an advanced directive which listed that the medical power of attorney /responsible party (POA/RP) was to make medical and financial decisions for Resident #47. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #47 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the medical record, the facility staff failed to provide written notice to Resident #40, #63, 61 and 47 or the resident's Responsible Party, of a transfer out of the facility. This was evident for 4 out of 4 residents investigated for hospitalizations during the survey process. The findings include: 1). On 12/13/18 at approximately 12:15 PM, Resident #40's medical record was reviewed for a recent hospitalization. On 11/12/18 the resident was transferred to a community hospital's emergency room (ER) to rule out sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs); due fever, increased heart rate, increased breathing rate, and confusion Per the doctor, the resident was extremely difficult to arouse. The resident unable to verbalize due to slurring of speech and patient immediately closes eyes after opening them. The resident was sent to the ER for escalation of care. During further review of the medical record, it was noted that there was no documentation of a written notice given to the resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Base on chart review and interview with the Admissions Director, The facility failed to send out a bed hold policy to the Responsible Party of Resident # 63. This was evident for 1 out of 3 resident medical records reviewed as transferred to the hospital. The findings include: Resident # 63 went out to the hospital on 6/14/18 through 6/16/18, and 7/2/18 through 7/10/18 and did not get a bed hold policy or notification in writing of the discharge according to the Director of Admissions Staff # 2.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to revise and update the care plan for Resident #47 after a change in condition. This was evident 1 out of 23 resident's involving Resident #47 during the survey process. The findings include: The care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Medical record review revealed that Resident #47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but was not limited to surgical aftercare with muscle weakness and other chronic health conditions which require ongoing treatment. Continued record review revealed that on 11/19/18 Resident #47 had experienced a fall as a change in condition. The resident was transferred to an acute care hospital for further evaluation. Medial record review revealed a fall care plan with an admission/initiation date of 11/02/018 which included goals and interventions for fall preventions. Further review of the medical record revealed that the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on investigations of the medication storage areas, it was determined the facility staff failed to dispose of out dated medical supplies and label another. This was evident for 1 out of 2 medication storage rooms inspected during the survey, and 1 out of 3 medication carts inspected. The findings include: On 12/17/18 around 3:20 PM, while inspecting the medication storage room on the [NAME] Oak Uunit, the following items were noted: 1. [NAME] 0.9% Sodium Chloride Inj USP 1000 ML- Labeled Discard 11/29/18 2. [NAME] 0.45% Sodium Chloride Inj UPS 1000 ML- Labeled Discard 11/24/18 3. [NAME] 5% Dextrose & 0.9% Sodium Chloride -Labeled Discard 9/10/18 4. [NAME] 5% Dextrose & 0.9% Sodium Chloride -Labeled Discard 5/17/18 5. [NAME] 5% Dextrose & 0.45 % Sodium Chloride -Labeled Discard 5/17/18 In the medication cart: 1. Latanoprost Ophthalmic 0.005% Solution was opened, not dated. The above stated items were given to staff #4

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir at MemorialDenison, TX 1 of 5Bennettsville Health And Rehabilitation CenterBennettsville, SC 1 of 5Calhoun Convalescent CenterSaint Matthews, SC 1 of 5Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the ParkwayCorinth, TX 1 of 5Forest Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation CtrCatonsville, MD 1 of 5Julia Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Lake Emory Post Acute CareInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenwoodGreenwood, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - InmanInman, SC 1 of 5Magnolia Manor - Rock HillRock Hill, SC 1 of 5Northampton Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenteFrederick, MD 1 of 5Oakbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterSummerville, SC 1 of 5Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOakland, MD 1 of 5Physical Rehabilitation And Wellness Center Of SpaSpartanburg, SC 1 of 5Riverside Health and RehabCharleston, SC 1 of 5San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care CenterRound Rock, TX 1 of 5Springdale Healthcare CenterCamden, SC 2 of 5Berlin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBerlin, MD 2 of 5Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBremond, TX 2 of 5Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterCrownsville, MD 2 of 5Faith Healthcare CenterFlorence, SC 2 of 5Falcon Ridge RehabilitationHutto, TX 2 of 5Hillside Heights Rehabilitation SuitesAmarillo, TX 2 of 5Horizon Health And Rehabilitation CenterLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Lancaster Health and RehabilitationLancaster, SC 2 of 5Las Ventanas De SocorroSocorro, TX 2 of 5Magnolia Manor - GreenvilleGreenville, SC 2 of 5Midlands Health & Rehabilitation CenterColumbia, SC 2 of 5Mira Vista CourtFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Moran Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWesternport, MD 2 of 5North Las Vegas Care CenterNorth las Vegas, NV 2 of 5Pavilion at Glacier ValleySlinger, WI 2 of 5Sandy Lake Rehabilitation And Care CenterCoppell, TX 2 of 5Southpointe Healthcare and RehabilitationGreenville, SC 2 of 5Spanish Hills Wellness SuitesLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Terra Bella Health and Wellness SuitesHouston, TX 2 of 5The Pavilion At CreekwoodMansfield, TX 2 of 5Villa Rosa Nursing And Rehabilitation, LLCMitchellville, MD 3 of 5Bridgecrest Rehabilitation SuitesHouston, TX 3 of 5Crimson Heights Health & WellnessHumble, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MARYLAND LONG TERM CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/18/2016
GREEN, CALANTHIAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/21/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$372K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 45%Medicare 47%Other / private 8%

This home reported $372K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$502per resident / day
operating cost
$15,247per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$468per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215362. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next