Arbor Hills Care & Rehab Center
800 Chambers Road, Ferguson, MO 63135 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 150 certified beds · (314) 524-1111 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $282,840 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-28)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (80%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 29.8% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 63.5% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.7% | 25.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.7% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.1% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.8% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 35.0% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.1% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.6% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.98 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.15 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.7–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 89.9 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, a lifesaving technique that's used in emergencies in which someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped) for one of four sampled residents, who was found by staff without a pulse (Resident #1). The resident expired. The facility also failed to have a code status for one resident (Resident #2), failed to have adequate supplies on the crash cart to allow staff to respond appropriately to an emergency situation, and failed to have a CPR certified staff member on each shift. The census was 82. The Administrator was notified on [DATE] at 3:02 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE], as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Emergency Procedure Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Policy, revised 2/2018, showed: -Policy Statement: Personnel have completed training on the initiation of CPR and basic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of 17 sampled residents were free from abuse. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N yelled at Resident #6 in the dining room and pulled on the resident's arm- telling the resident he/she needed to leave and eat in their room, causing the resident to cry and be afraid. CNA G scolded Resident #7 when he/she yelled for assistance with continence care, due to not having a call light within reach. CNA G told the resident it was the last time he/she was going to care for the resident in bed, causing him/her to feel hurt and disrespected. During a later event, CNA G spoke disrespectfully towards the resident while walking past them. The census was 86. Review of the abuse prevention policy, dated 9/16/24, showed: -Prevention and reporting: Suspected resident/patient abuse, neglect and/or misappropriation of property; -The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, etc; -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Primary Care Physician and obtain orders for pressure ulcers (ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) when they were first identified for two residents (Resident #2 and #5) out of three sampled residents. The facility also failed to administer treatments as ordered and failed to have consistent documentation of the wounds. The census was 84. Review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide, Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel 2014 showed the following: -Assess the pressure ulcer initially and re-assess it at least weekly; -With each dressing change, observed the pressure ulcer for signs that indicate a change in treatments as required (e.g., Wound improvement, wound deterioration, more or less…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address an order of increased fluids from the Primary Care Physician (PCP) on 9/10/24 and again on 11/22/24 from the Registered Dietitian (RD) for a resident with diagnoses of severe malnutrition, renal (kidney) disease and abnormal lab values, for one out of three sampled residents (Resident #3). This resulted in the resident's hospitalization with the admitting diagnoses of renal failure, hypernatremia (high sodium levels in the blood) and altered mental status. The census was 84. Review of the facility's Nutrition and Hydration to Maintain Skin Integrity policy, revised October 2010, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the assessment of resident nutritional needs, to aid in the development of an individualized care plan for nutritional interventions, and to help support the integrity of the skin through nutrition and hydration; -When there is a decline in a resident's appetite, nutritional intake, weight, or overall condition, caregivers should first attempt to discover the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents (Resident (R)54 and R45) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 24 did not engage in verbal threats that escalated to physical abuse of kicking and slapping each other. R45 suffered psychosocial harm following the incidents as evidenced by her fearful comments to her psychiatric Nurse Practitioner and to other staff members. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program revised December 2016, revealed .Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation and exploitation. This includes freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse .As part of the abuse prevention the administration will: 1. Protect our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, vendors, visitors, family members, or any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review, interview, and observations, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer interventions after surgery for left hip repair and failed to follow physician's treatment orders for one of four residents (Resident (R) 63) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 24 residents. This failure caused actual harm when R63 acquired unstageable pressure ulcers on the left foot. Findings include: Review of the Census tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R63 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Med Diag [Medical Diagnoses] tab located in the EMR revealed R63 was readmitted with diagnoses including surgical repair of the left hip. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/25/23 revealed R63 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 indicating severe cognitive decline. Review of a Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure food items were dated and covered and failed to remove dented cans from the storage room. The facility also failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a clean condition during three of four days of observation and failed to ensure a sheet of ice was removed from the threshold of the walk-in freezer. In addition, the facility failed to utilize safe and sanitary food handling techniques when staff handled food from the steam table using gloved hands instead of utensils, used the steam table line as a cutting board, and mashed food for mechanical soft diets with gloved hands during one of two kitchen meal service observations. The facility also failed to ensure hall trays were transported in a manner to prevent contamination when not all food items were covered during three of three hall tray meal observations. The census was 89.1. Review of the facility's Refrigeration policy dated 3/31/21 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect when staff spoke to one resident in an undignified manner (Resident #81), when the facility failed to provide adequate utensils at meals (Residents #24 and #79), and when staff stood over a resident while providing feeding assistance for one resident (Resident #9). The sample was 18. The census was 89. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 1/28/26, showed the facility shall treat residents with kindness, respect and dignity and ensure Resident Rights are being followed. Review of the facility's admission Agreement, undated, showed:-Resident Rights:--Residents Be Treated with Respect: Residents have the right to be treated with dignity and respect, as well as make their own schedule and participate in the activities their choose;-- Residents Free from Abuse and Neglect: Residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse. 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure general accounting principles were followed by failing to complete monthly resident trust fund (RTF) reconciliations, resulting in the inability to accurately account for money held in the RTF account. In addition, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to residents and their representatives. The facility held funds for 44 residents. The census was 89.Review of the facility's Resident Trust policy, undated, showed:-Policy: The facility shall provide a RTF cash box and a separate bonded interest-bearing bank account for all residents who choose to have their personal money safeguarded and managed by the facility. The resident or their legal guardian are the only ones who can designate what the monies are spent on and have the right to request their RTF ledger at any time;-Procedures: --An internal audit of the RTF will be completed on a quarterly basis by the corporate office. --The RTF is to be reconciled monthly and balanced to the bank statement;-- Upon admission, each resident shall sign Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or resident representatives a bed hold policy at the time of transfer or as soon as practicable when residents were transferred to the hospital for two residents (Resident #83 and #8). In addition, the facility failed to send a copy of discharge notices to the representative of the Office of State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman. The census was 89.Review of the facility's Resident Bed Hold policy, dated revised on 9/16/25, showed:-The Facility shall have a process in place to notify residents and/or their representatives in writing of the facility's bed-hold policy in advance of being transferred to the hospital or when taking therapeutic leave of absence from the facility. In the event of an emergency transfer, the notice shall be provided within 24 hours.1. Review of Resident #83's medical record, showed:-discharged to the hospital on [DATE];-No documentation staff notified the Ombudsman of the discharge;-No documentation the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. The facility identified three medication rooms and seven medication/treatment carts. Two medication rooms and four medication/treatment carts were sampled for medication storage. Issues were found with both medication rooms and three out of four medication/treatment carts when staff failed to remove/discard expired medication and failed to label medications with a resident's name on it. The census was 89. Review of the facility's Medication Storage in the Facility policy, dated 1/26, showed:-Medications labeled for individual residents are stored separately from floor stock medications;-Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to the procedures for medication destruction, and reordered from the pharmacy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control procedures when staff used non-medical-grade disinfectant wipes to clean the glucometer (device used to measure how much glucose (sugar) is present in the bloodstream) used on three residents (Residents #28, #46, and #48). In addition, the facility failed to store one resident's nebulizer tubing and mask per policy, creating a potential risk for cross-contamination and infection (Resident #52). The sample was 18. The census was 89. Review of the facility's Communicable Disease Management Policy, revised 10/2022, showed:-The Facility will establish Infection Prevention & Control Guidelines to prevent the transmission of infections, communicable diseases and healthcare associated infections (HAI) to ensure the safety of residents and employees;-Employees shall utilize barriers to avoid direct contact;-Employees shall implement Isolation barriers beyond standard precautions (precautions used to care of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident sampled for a Level Two Pre-admission Screening/Resident Review (PASARR) had the services and supports recommended, and failed to ensure the services and supports were on the care plan (Resident #8). The census was 89.Review of the facility's PASARR policy, revised 2/24/26, showed residents should have required PASARRs. Information obtained from the PASARR should be documented on the care plan, including needed services. Review of Resident #8'squarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/1/25, showed:-Should the staff assessment for mental status be conducted? No;-Is there evidence of an acute change in mental status? No;-Diagnoses included: Schizophrenia (serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) and bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs (mania or hypomania) and lows (depression)). Review of the resident's PASARR level two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care needs were met for a dependent resident. The facility failed to ensure the resident received assistance in the dining room during meals and failed to ensure the resident's hands and nails were cleaned (Resident #3). The sample was 18. The census was 89. Review of the facility's policy titled ADL Care Shaving, reviewed on 07/21/22, showed: ADL care will include shaving to promote cleanliness and dignity; Review of the facility's policy titled Nail Care, reviewed on 07/21/22, showed: -The purpose of nail care is to clean the nail bed, trim nails and prevent infection;-Nails may be cleaned during bathing; -Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming Review of the Resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 12/16/25, showed:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Dependent on staff for bathing and personal hygiene; -Functional impairment in range of motion to upper extremities on both sides;-Rejection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe a treatment order into the medical record timely and failed to follow physician orders when staff failed to administer the treatment as ordered for one resident sampled with wounds. The facility also failed to implement care plan interventions for pressure relief (Resident #3). The census was 89. Review of the facility's Physician Orders policy, dated 09/28/22, showed:-Physician orders shall be provided by licensed practitioners (Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, & Physician's Assistants) authorized to prescribe orders;-Orders must be recorded in the medical record by the licensed nurse authorized to transcribe such orders;-Physician orders will be transcribed to the appropriate Administration Record Medication (MAR/eMAR) or Treatment Administration Record (TAR/eTAR);- Telephone/verbal orders: the licensed nurse is required to transcribe the order accurately in the medical record/ physician order sheet (POS) and on the appropriate MAR/TAR. Review of the facility's Wound Management policy, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free of accidents when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) left a resident unattended in a filled whirlpool to gather supplies. (Resident #83). While the CNA exited the spa and another staff member entered, the resident slipped down into the water. The other staff member had to pull the resident up. The resident said water got in his/her mouth. The resident told another CNA that staff tried to kill him/her and said he/she was now too scared to go back into the whirlpool. The mechanical lift the CNA said he/she used was not assessed for safety concerns after the incident occurred. The facility also failed to ensure safe smoking practices when staff failed to ensure residents disposed of cigarettes in an appropriate receptacle during two of two smoke breaks observed (Residents #53, #69, #68, and #50), the facility identified 14 residents who smoked. The sample was 18. The census was 89. Review of the facility's policy tilted, ADL (activities of daily living) Care Bathing, revised 07/21/22, showed:-Stay…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for two residents (Resident #52 and #71). The failure placed both residents at risk for adverse effects and compromised therapeutic outcomes when Resident #52 was not monitored during a scheduled nebulizer treatment resulting in the treatment mask falling off the resident and Resident #71 had lidocaine patches applied for longer than recommended by the manufacturer. Sample size 18. The census was 89.1. Review of the state of Missouri Certified Medication Technician (CMT) Student Manual showed administering medications using a nebulizer: The CMT may administer inhaled medications using a nebulizer if permitted by facility policy. Due to variances in equipment, the facility must provide the CMT with training on the operation of the nebulizer system(s) being used in the facility. Documentation of the training and competency in use of the equipment must be placed in the employees' record. During an interview on 2/20/25 at 9:22 A.M., the Corporate Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders when staff failed to obtain labs and an x-ray timely for one resident (Resident #3). The sample was 18. The census was 89.Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/12/25, showed:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Functional limitations in range of motion in both upper and lower extremities;-Dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL, grooming, dressing and bathing);-Diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia, aphasia (language disorder that impairs a person's ability to speak, understand, read, and write), paraplegia (paralysis that affects all or part of the trunk, legs, and pelvic organs) and multiple sclerosis (MS, a chronic, progressive disease involving damage to the nerve cells);-One stage 2 pressure ulcer (a partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed without slough, may also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister);-Three stage 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient dietary support personnel to effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. During one of two kitchen meal service observations, meals were served late and dietary staff failed to follow the menu and serve all menu items due to not having enough dietary staff. The census was 89.During an interview on 2/17/26 at 9:59 A.M., the Assistant Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Corporate Nurse said mealtimes are scheduled for 8:00 A.M., 12:30 P.M., and 6:00 P.M. Review of the Schedule of Mealtimes, showed breakfast in the dining room scheduled at 8:00 A.M., lunch in the dining room scheduled for 12:30 P.M., and supper in the dining room scheduled for 6:00 P.M. Review of the facility's breakfast menu for the date of 2/18/26, showed juice of choice, cereal of choice, egg, biscuit, sausage gravy, skim milk, and coffee or hot tea. Observation of the breakfast meal service on 2/18/26 at 9:06 A.M. showed staff passed drinks in the main dining room. Meal service began…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to identify and treat pressure ulcers (injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or friction) when staff failed to complete daily wound care as ordered for one resident (Resident #6). In addition, the facility also failed to ensure four residents, identified as at risk for development of pressure ulcers, received weekly skin assessments as ordered (Residents #6, #2, #3, and #7). The sample was 8. The census was 73.Review of the facility's Wound Care policy, dated October 2010, showed:-The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wound to promote healing;-Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure;-Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Review of the facility's Physician and Non-Physician Practitioner Orders policy, dated 1/1/22, showed with changing ways in communication it will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review,, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #2) change in condition was appropriately documented and treated after the resident missed multiple doses of medication. The facility also failed to follow physician orders to order pain medication for one resident (Resident #6). The sample size was eight. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Change in Condition or Status policy, dated 12/2016, showed:-Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status;-Policy implementation: The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): accident or incident involving the resident, discovery of injuries of an unknown source, adverse reaction to medication, significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition, need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly, refusal of treatment or medications two or more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided in accordance with the resident's care plan and accepted professional standards of clinical practices. The facility failed to ensure medications including torsemide (treats fluid retention), Amiodarone (heart medication), Lidocaine 4% patch, and Metoprolol (blood pressure medication) were ordered timely and administered for one resident (Resident #29) who had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the resident was assessed for side rails and document a rationale for the use of side rails. The sample was 11. The census was 83. The administrator was notified on 4/28/25, of the past non-compliance. Staff were in-serviced on the side rail assessment policy and medication administration policy. The deficiency was corrected on 3/5/25. Review of the facility's Medication and Treatment Orders policy, revised July 2016, showed: -Drug and biological orders must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice. The facility identified three nurse medication carts and three medication rooms. Three of the three nurse medication carts were checked, and issues were found with all three carts. Staff failed to store Ativan (lorazepam, a controlled substance used to treat anxiety) liquid medication in the refrigerator, as it is labeled to be stored in the refrigerator, and had it stored in the nurse medication cart narcotic lock box. The sample was 9. The census was 83. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, revised April 2007, showed: -Policy Statement: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers; -The nursing staff shall be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility residents were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Activity Aide A spoke loudly towards one resident with severe cognitive impairment when the resident dropped a plastic wrapper on the floor (Resident #9). Additionally, direct care staff openly argued and cursed at the nurses' station in front of residents (Residents #12, #13, #14 and #21) about providing showers to residents. The sample was 17. The census was 86. Review of the Resident Right Policy, dated 12/2016, showed: -Policy statement: employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity; -Policy Interpretation and implementation: federal and state laws guarantee basic rights to all residents of the facility. These rights include the resident's right to: -A dignified existence; -Be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; -Self-determination; -Be free from abuse and neglect; -Be supported by the facility to exercise rights without interference, coercion or reprisal from the facility. 1. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of alleged abuse for one resident (Resident #11) per facility policy. Review of the facility investigation, provided during the onsite investigation, showed it did not include statements from staff or residents. The sample size was 17. The census was 86. Review of the abuse prevention policy, revised 9/16/24, showed: -Investigation: -When an incident or suspected incident of abuse or neglect is reported, the Administrator or designee investigates the incident with the assistance of appropriate personnel; -The investigation should be thorough with witness statements from staff, residents, family members who may be interviewable and have information regarding the allegation; -The investigation may consist of an interview with the person reporting the incident and witnesses, an interview with the resident if possible, a review of the resident's medical record, and interview with staff members having contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards for one out of three sampled residents (Resident #1) when staff failed to follow physician orders as written. A urine specimen was not collected until 8 days after ordered by the physician. Antibiotic treatment was also delayed. The census was 84. Review of the facility's Medication and Treatment Orders, revised July 2016, showed: -Policy Statement: Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing; -Medications shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state; -Drug and biological orders must be recorded on the Physician's Order Sheet in the resident's chart. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/03/24, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -Severely cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for feeding assistance at mealtime for nutrition and hydration for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2) who required assistance to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). The census was 84. Review of the facility's Assistance with Meals policy, revised July 2017, showed: -Policy statement: Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident; -For residents requiring full assistance, nursing will remove food trays from the food cart and deliver the trays to each residents' room; -Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort and dignity, Review of Resident #2's Registered Dietician note, dated 10/10/24 at 5:40 P.M., showed: -The resident was on regular - mechanical soft diet with thin liquids and was to receive health shakes three times a day (TID), fortified foods TID and was to receive Nutritional Supplement shakes for mid-day and night (HS) snacks; -The resident liked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained infection control and proper positioning of the tubing and reservoir bag, for one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter (Foley catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the urethra (the tube that cares urine from the bladder to the outside of the body) to drain urine from the bladder into a collection bag) and recent history of urinary tract infection (Resident #15). The census was 86. Review of the facility's Catheter Care, Urinary policy, dated September 2014, showed: -Purpose: To prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTIs, infection of the urinary tract system); -Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident; -Check the resident frequently to be sure he or she is not lying on the catheter and to keep the catheter and tubing free of kinks; -The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder; -Be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
See 81JV12 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to a report that the Business Office Manager (BOM) had been placed on the Employee Disqualification List (EDL, a listing of individuals disqualified from working in a certified nursing home) indicating he/she was ineligible to work in a certified long-term care facility, and continued to employ the staff member. The Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) notified the facility on 10/30/24 at 11:45 A.M., that the BOM was permanently placed on the EDL on 10/22/24, and he/she was still working at the facility when surveyors began the investigation on 11/14/24. The census was 95. Review of the EDL Active Report, showed: -The BOM's name and Social Security Number; -Added: 10/22/24; -Ordered Length: Permanent. During an interview on 11/14/24 at 1:41 P.M., the Human Resources (HR) Director said he/she was not aware the BOM had been placed on the EDL. No one notified him/her of the placement. The BOM was currently employed by the facility and had worked as recently as the previous day. The BOM was out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See 81JV12 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Staff failed to discontinue a medication used to lower blood sugar as ordered for one resident (Resident #13). The census was 95. Review of the facility's Medication and Treatment Orders Policy, dated 7/2016, showed the following: -Policy: Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with the principles of safe and effective order writing; -1. Medications shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such such medication in this state; -3. Drug and biological orders must be recorded on the physician's order sheet in the resident's chart; -4. All drug and biological orders shall be written, dated and signed by the person lawfully authorized to give such an order; -9. Orders for medication must include: a. Name and strength of the medication. b. Number of doses, start and stop date and or specific duration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the vehicle used to transport residents was in proper working order, free from debris, and free from exposed wires. This had the potential to affect all residents who used the van. The facility also failed to ensure a completed and thorough investigation was performed and documented after each resident fall for two out of 10 sampled residents (Resident #5 and Resident #6). The census was 86. Review of the facility's Safety and Supervision of Residents policy, undated, showed: -Policy Statement: Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities; -Safety risks and environmental hazards are identified on an ongoing basis through a combination of employee training, employee monitoring, and reporting processes. A facility-wide commitment to safety at all levels of the organization. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to a report that the Business Office Manager (BOM) had been placed on the Employee Disqualification List (EDL, a listing of individuals disqualified from working in a certified nursing home) indicating he/she was ineligible to work in a certified long-term care facility, and continued to employ the staff member. The Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) notified the facility on 10/30/24 at 11:45 A.M., that the BOM was permanently placed on the EDL on 10/22/24, and he/she was still working at the facility when surveyors began the investigation on 11/14/24. The census was 95. Review of the EDL Active Report, showed: -The BOM's name and Social Security Number; -Added: 10/22/24; -Ordered Length: Permanent. During an interview on 11/14/24 at 1:41 P.M., the Human Resources (HR) Director said he/she was not aware the BOM had been placed on the EDL. No one notified him/her of the placement. The BOM was currently employed by the facility and had worked as recently as the previous day. The BOM was out of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Staff failed to discontinue a medication used to lower blood sugar as ordered for one resident (Resident #13). The census was 95. Review of the facility's Medication and Treatment Orders Policy, dated 7/2016, showed the following: -Policy: Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with the principles of safe and effective order writing; -1. Medications shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such such medication in this state; -3. Drug and biological orders must be recorded on the physician's order sheet in the resident's chart; -4. All drug and biological orders shall be written, dated and signed by the person lawfully authorized to give such an order; -9. Orders for medication must include: a. Name and strength of the medication. b. Number of doses, start and stop date and or specific duration of therapy. c.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with outlined food preferences to meet the needs of one of 3 sampled residents (Resident #4). The census was 86. Review of the facility's Tray Identification policy, undated, showed: -Appropriate identification shall be used to identify various diets; -To assist in setting up and serving the correct food trays/diets to residents, the Food Service Department will use appropriate identification to identify the various diets. Review of Resident #4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/20/24, showed: -Understood, understands, clear comprehension; -Cognitively intact. Review of the Resident #4's care plan, dated 6/21/24, showed: -Assess the resident's likes and dislikes and attempt to accommodate; -No pork, no cooked tomatoes or carrots; -Prefers fresh vegetables and fruits, doesn't like cooked carrots or tomatoes. He/She prefers fish, chicken, and turkey. Turkey sausage and bacon. He/She prefers no gravy on his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing report, and nursing schedules from 10/01/23 to 12/31/23, the facility failed to ensure the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 22 of the 92 days reviewed. Failure to have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours a day has the potential to affect the care provided to residents and the supervision of the unit. Findings include: Review of the PBJ, for the fiscal year quarter one of 2024, revealed no RN hours triggered for four or more days October, November, and December 2023. Review of the facility's Nursing Schedules, dated from 10/01/23 through 12/31/23, revealed no RN coverage on 10/01/23, 10/07/23, 10/15/23, 10/28/23, and 10/29/23. In November 2023 there was no RN coverage for 11/04/23, 11/05/23, 11/11/23, 11/12/23, 11/18/23, 11/19/23, 11/25/23, 11/26/23. In December 2023 there was no RN coverage for 12/02/23, 12/03/23, 12/09/23, 12/10/23, 12/16/23, 12/23/23, 12/24/23, 12/25/23, and 12/31/23. During an interview on 04/30/24 at 4:00 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, initiate, or revise, if necessary, a facility assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during day-to-day operations. The lack of an adequate facility assessment had the potential for residents' needs to go unmet and/or result in a lack of services provided by the facility to competently care for 78 residents who resided at the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: During the entrance conference on 04/29/24 at 10:15 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the Facility Assessment was requested. As of 04/30/24 at 4:30 PM, the Facility Assessment had not been provided. During an interview on 04/30/24 at 4:30 PM, regarding the Facility Assessment, with the Administrator and DON, the Administrator asked .What is a Facility Assessment? . This surveyor provided a verbal description of a Facility Assessment and the Administrator stated they did not have one, nor were they asked to provide one during their initial certification in January 2022, or on any of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This had the potential to affect 78 of 78 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's Quality Assurance Improvement Plan, dated February 2020, revealed, .The QAPI plan describes the process for identifying and correcting quality deficiencies. Key components of this process include A. Tracking and measuring performance, B. Establishing goals and thresholds for performance measurement, C. Identifying and prioritizing quality deficiencies, D. Systematically analyzing underlying causes of systemic quality deficiencies, E. Developing and implementing corrective action or performance improvement activities, and F. Monitoring or evaluating the effectiveness of corrective action/performance improvement activities and revising as needed . During an interview on 05/01/24 at 2:05 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility did not have a QAPI plan. During an interview on 05/02/24 at 2:15 PM, the Administrator and DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, the Quality Assurance (QA) committee failed to identify quality deficiencies, , develop or implement corrective actions, , track, and measured for effectiveness or develop new interventions based on the QA committee discussions. This failure had the potential to affect 78 of 78 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated February 2020, revealed . This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven (QAPI) program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of-life for our residents. and .Provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life. During an interview on 05/01/24 at 2:05 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility did not have a QAPI plan. During an interview on 05/02/24 at 12:30 PM, the DON stated the QA committee had not identified any specific quality deficiencies for performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, the Quality Assurance (QA) committee failed to meet, at least quarterly, with the required members resulting in the potential for missed opportunities with identifying, tracking, and measuring quality deficiencies. This failure had the potential to affect 78 of 78 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated February 2020, revealed . The committee meets monthly to review reports, evaluate data, and monitor QAPI related activities and make adjustments to the plan. The DON provided two QA committee sign in sheets for 11/18/22 where the DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), and Medical Director did not attend. The 09/28/23 sign in sheets revealed the Administrator and Medical Director did not attend. During an interview on 05/02/24 at 12:30 PM, the DON confirmed there have only been two QA meetings since the initial certification survey in January 2022. The DON also stated there have not been any QA meetings for 2024, nor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account. The facility did not provide residents with refunds of their personal funds from the operating account in a timely manner for six residents (Residents #1016, #1019, #1027, #1028, #1029, and #1030). Secondly, the facility staff failed to obtain written authorization from the resident and/or financial guardian for money withdrawn for 19 residents (Resident #1001, #1002, #1003, #1004, #1005, #1006, #1007, #1008, #1009, #1010, #1011, #1012, #1013, #1014, #1015, #1019, #1020, #1023, and #1025) out of a sample of 20. Thirdly, the facility staff failed to provide the Social Security and/or Medicaid monthly allowance in a timely manner, which did not allow the resident/financial guardian the right to manage all of his/her financial affairs for seven residents (Resident #1001, #1004, #1005, #1008, #1009, #1010, and #1013) out of a sample of 10. Fourthly, the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund account by not reconciling each month. The facility managed funds for 21 residents. The census was 80. 1. Record review of the facility maintained bank statements for account ending in #5015 for months 03/2023 through 12/2023 and 02/2024 - 03/2024 showed no documentation of reconciliations. Record review of the facility maintained attempted reconciliation forms for account ending in #5015, dated 09/2023 and 03/2024, showed the attempted reconciliations did not reconcile to the residents' current balance at the time of reconciliation. During an interview on 05/10/24 at 3:37 P.M., the Business Office Manager said he/she did not start reconciling the account until 08/2023 and continued to say the accounts were reconciled, but did not have any other documentation to provide.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a final accounting of resident fund balances within thirty days to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate for one discharged resident (Resident #1020) out of a sample of three discharged and four expired residents (Resident #1019, #1023, #1025, and #1026) out of a sample of five expired. The facility census was 80. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Trust Transaction History Report dated [DATE], showed Resident #1020 discharged on [DATE]. Record review of the facility maintained Trust Transaction Report for the period [DATE] through [DATE], showed Resident #1020 had $30.00 deposited on [DATE] and was not refunded as of [DATE], 33 days after discharge date . During an interview on [DATE] at 1:54 P.M., the Business Office Manager said he/she did not know why the $30 had not been refunded. 2. Record review of the facility maintained Discharge Report dated [DATE], showed Resident #1019 expired on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an adequate surety bond for the resident trust fund account in the amount of one and one half times the average monthly balance for the past 11 months. The census was 80. Review of the resident trust account for the past 12 months, from March 2023 through February 2024, (excluding the December 2023) showed an average monthly balance of $26,000.00 (this would yield a required bond in the amount of $39,000.00 (one and one half times the average monthly balance)). Review of the bond report for approved facility bonds by the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), showed an approved bond of $4,000.00, dated 8/23/21. Review of the resident trust current balance report for February 2024, showed an amount of $13,782.56 in the trust account. During an interview on 5/7/24 at 11:30 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said the Administrator was in charge to ensure the surety had the appropriate amount. The BOM did not know how often the Administrator reviewed the surety bond. They do not have a policy for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post the location of the state survey results and provide unrestricted access to residents and visitors, resulting in the potential for current residents, visitors, and potential residents not to be able to review the survey results and the facility's plans of correction (POC). Findings include: Observations conducted throughout the facility from 04/29/24 to 05/01/24 revealed no notices posted in the facility to notify residents or visitors where the survey results binder was located. A binder labeled Survey Results was located behind the front desk on 04/29/24 when the survey team entered. Review of the Survey Results binder on 05/01/24 revealed documentation from a Targeted Infection Control survey completed on 04/18/22. The documentation did not contain the facilities POC. During an interview on 04/30/24 at 4:30 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) stated the Survey Results binder was kept behind the receptionist's desk. The Administrator stated a binder had been placed in the lobby area at one time, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to issue an accurate Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) when Medicare Part A service was ending for three of three residents (Residents (R) 1, R25, and R67) reviewed out of a total sample of 24 residents. This failure could have led the residents or their responsible party to miss the deadline to request an expedited appeal and review. Findings include: The facility used the directions for completion of the NOMNC from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) form number CMS-10123 as their policy. The directions indicated that in the heading and first two bullet points of the NOMNC the form was to read, .The effective date your {insert type} services will end: {insert effective date}: Fill in the type of services ending, {home health, skilled nursing, comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation services, or hospice} and the actual date the service will end. The portion of the NOMNC detailing how to ask for an immediate appeal was to include, .Insert the name and telephone numbers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Residents #1008, #1010, and #1019) were free from misappropriation of resident property when the Business Office Manager used resident funds for his/her personal use. The census was 80. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Trust Transaction Report for the period 05/01/23 through 05/07/24, showed a withdrawal from Resident #1019's account: Date Amount Description 10/10/23 $5,175.00 Funeral Home Record review of the facility maintained documentation showed check #1046 in the amount of $5,175.00, dated 10/10/23, made payable to Resident #1019's family member. Record review of the facility maintained documentation showed the Business Office Manager provided a Statement of Funeral Goods and Services Selected from a funeral home in Maplewood, MO showing the following: -Resident #1019's handwritten name at the top of the form -The Statement was originally dated 05/01/2018 at the top of the bill and showed the bill was paid in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees were screened to rule out the presence of a Federal Indicator, with the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry for three staff members. In addition, the facility failed to check for nursing licensing for one Registered Nurse (RN) and three Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN). A sample of 10 employees hired were reviewed. The facility hired at least 200 new employees since the last survey. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating Policy, dated April 2021, showed the following: -Policy: All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported; -Review of the facility's policy showed no documentation regarding employee screening for background…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure daily staffing was posted timely and in a manner that visitors and residents had access to this information. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents and visitors. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers revised July 2016, indicated, .Within two (2) hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of Licensed Nurses (RNs, LPNs, and LPN's) and the number of unlicensed personnel (CNA's) directly responsible for resident care will be posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors) and in a clear and readable format . Upon entrance to the facility at 9:00 AM, no daily staff posting of nursing hours was visible anywhere in the building. Tour of the building at 2:00 PM revealed no posting of the daily nurse staffing hours anywhere. During observations on 04/29/24 at 10:30 AM and 2:00 PM, no daily staff posting of nursing hours was visible anywhere in the building. During observations on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record to include required Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I and Level II, if applicable, evaluations for mental illness or intellectual disabilities for three of 24 sampled residents. This failure to have the PASRR screening results increased the risk that residents with mental illness or intellectual disabilities would not get all the required specialized services in the facility. Findings include: 1. R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia and history of traumatic brain injury sustained during an arrest. Review of R54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/14/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R54 was ambulatory via wheelchair. He did not participate meaningfully in interviews when attempted, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (SA) a verbal threat to shoot residents and staff in the facility by one of six residents (Resident (R)54) reviewed for abuse out of a total of 24 sampled residents. This failure increased the risk that additional verbal threats would continue without the SA's knowledge and opportunity to investigate. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting revised December 2016, revealed Policy Statement - All reports of resident abuse, neglect .mistreatment shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported . R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia and history of traumatic brain injury sustained during an arrest. Review of R54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a threat to shoot residents and staff in the facility verbalized by one of six residents (Resident (R)54) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 24 residents. This failure to thoroughly investigate the verbal threat to shoot staff and residents increased the risk of the threat actually being carried out by R54. In addition, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation in accordance with their policy. The facility did not suspend the employee promptly and re-instated the employee prior to speaking with all potential witnesses. In addition, the employee accused of misappropriation made contact with one of the residents one more than one occasion, including in person. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating revised April 2021, showed: -Policy Statement - All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) or responsible party a notice of transfer when R1 was sent to the emergency room. Findings include: Review of R1's Face Sheet located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was initially admitted on [DATE] for long-term care. Among his diagnoses on his Face Sheet were Type 2 diabetes mellitus and dementia. Review of the Documents tab of the EMR revealed there were no documents uploaded reflecting a transfer notice was provided to R1 when he was sent out on 04/13/24 for a hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) event. An interview was attempted with R1 on 05/01/24 at 1:30 PM however he did not respond. On 05/02/24 at 10:44 AM a second interview was attempted with R1 with no response from him. On 05/02/24 at 2:39 PM an interview with the social worker (SW) verified there was no written transfer provided to R1. The facility was unable to provide a policy for issuing a written notice to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) or their responsible party out of a total sample of 24 residents a bed hold notice when R1 was sent to the emergency room. Findings include: Review of R1's Face Sheet located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was initially admitted on [DATE] for long-term care. Among his diagnoses on his Face Sheet were Type 2 diabetes mellitus and dementia. Review of the Documents tab of the EMR revealed there were no documents uploaded reflecting a bed hold form was provided to R1 when he was sent out on 04/13/24 for a hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) event. An interview was attempted with R1 on 05/01/24 at 1:30 PM however he did not respond. On 05/02/24 at 10:44 AM a second interview was attempted with R1 with no response from him. On 05/02/24 at 2:39 PM an interview with the social worker (SW)verified that no bed hold notice was provided to R1 upon transfer to the hospital. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to accurately code one of 24 residents (Resident (R) 61) for restraints. This failure placed the resident at risk for the use of restraints. Findings include: Review of the document titled, MDS (Minimum Data Set) 3.0, Care Assessment Summary and Individualized Care Plans revealed the directions for completing the MDS Section P for restraints. The section stated .discusses the various types of restraints.how to assess a resident for physical restraint. The document was not dated. R61 was observed on 05/01/24 at 3:30 PM in her room sitting on the side of her bed. She was transferring herself to the wheelchair. There were no restraints on the wheelchair or her bed. Interview with the MDS Coordinator on 05/01/24 at 3:45 PM confirmed R61 did not have any restraints at any time during her stay in the facility. She stated, It's an error. Review of the quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/13/24 revealed R61 was coded in the section titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to reassess interventions for efficacy when the current behavior management interventions (both medications and nonpharmacologic interventions) were not effective in decreasing verbally and physically abusive behaviors towards other residents and staff in one of five residents (Resident (R) 54) reviewed for psychosocial and behavior management out of a total sample of 24 residents. This failure increased the risk of ongoing abusive behaviors towards residents and staff by R54. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Behavioral Health Services revised February 2019 revealed, The facility will provide and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for each resident .7. Staff are scheduled in sufficient numbers to manage resident needs during the day, evening and night .11. The DON, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that monthly medication regimen reviews were completed by the consulting pharmacy for two of 24 sampled residents (Resident (R)22 and R25), resulting in the potential for adverse side effects from unnecessary, or duplicate, medications. Findings include: 1. Review of R22's admission Record (undated), located under the Profiles tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included of dementia with agitation, major depressive disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of R22's quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/06/24 revealed R22, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of zero which indicated R22 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of R22's Medication Administration Records (MAR) dated December 2023 revealed R22 had an order for .Haldol 5 milligrams (mg) by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications ordered on an as needed (PRN) basis for two of 24 sampled residents (Resident (R)22 and R25), included a stop date no later than 14 days after receipt of the order, resulting in the potential for adverse side effects from unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 12/12, revealed, .If a resident uses PRN medications frequently, the Attending Physician and Interdisciplinary Care Team, with support from the Consultant Pharmacist as needed, shall reevaluate the situation, examine the individual as needed, determine if there is a clinical reason for the frequent PRN use, and consider whether a standing dose of medication is clinically indicated . 1.Review of R22's admission Record (undated), located under the Profiles tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with agitation, major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party after new skin conditions, which required treatment, were identified, for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident #1). The facility census was 69. Review of the facility's Changes in Condition Notification policy, revised 11/2022, showed: -It is the responsibility of licensed staff to contact the physician and the resident's responsible party whenever there is a change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status; -A change in condition is any assessment finding, observance, or event that deviates or has the potential to cause a deviation in the resident's usual or expected physical, mental, or psychosocial status; -Except in situations where a medical emergency exists, all notifications will be made within 24 hours of the noted change; -Upon identification of a change in condition, licensed nursing personnel will contact the resident's responsible party to inform them of the change. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when staff failed to ensure a resident who receives hemodialysis (a procedure that filters wastes, salts and fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer healthy enough) received ordered medication to treat elevated potassium levels. The staff also failed to consult with the ordering physician on suggested medication alternatives, so the resident could begin the medication. As a result, the resident did not receive the ordered medication and the resident's blood potassium level increased (Resident #4). The potassium level increased and was detected by the dialysis staff. When the dialysis staff inquired about the ordered medications to treat elevated potassium levels, the facility staff stated the medications were not provided to the resident. The sample was four. The census was 68. Review of the Medication Administration policy, revised 12/2012, showed: -Policy: medications shall be administered in a safe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to do neurological checks (neuro-checks, an assessment completed by nursing staff to monitor for changes in the resident's neurological (nervous system) status) in accordance with the facility's policy for a resident with repeated falls (Resident #4). The sample was 12. The census was 60. Review of the facility's Falls-Clinical Protocol policy, revised March 2018, showed: -Assessment and recognition: After a fall the nurse shall assess and document/report the following: -Vital signs; -Recent injury, especially fracture or head injury; -Musculoskeletal function, observe for change in normal range of motion (ROM) and weight bearing; -Change in condition and level of consciousness; -Neurological status; -Pain; -Frequency and number of falls; -Precipitating factors and details on how fall occurred; -Current medications, specifically those associated with dizziness or lethargy; -Active diagnoses; -The policy did not show how often and how long neuro-checks should be completed. Review of a computer generated Neurological…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document assessment of pain and effectiveness of pain relief medications and provide pain management in accordance with the resident's physician orders (Resident #7). The sample was 12. The census was 60. Review of the facility's pain assessment and management procedure, revised 3/2015, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address the underlying causes of pain; -General Guidelines: -2. Pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals; -3. Pain management is a multidisciplinary care process that includes the following: -a. Assessing the potential for pain; -b. Effectively recognizing the presence of pain; -c. Identifying the characteristics of pain; -d. Addressing the underlying causes of the pain; -e.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$282,840 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $127,275 — penalty dated 2025-01-28
- $155,565 — penalty dated 2024-05-17
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-05 for 43 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-25 for 37 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1026 ENTERPRISES II, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| CDW INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| MM ACQUISITIONS, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| MO OPCO GROUP, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| NDF HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| 10-26 NATIONWIDE TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| BCJ ENTERPRISES, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| JFB CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| BIENSTOCK, FAIGIE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| BIENSTOCK, JUDAH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| FRIEDMAN, NAFTALI | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| JEREMIAS, BARUCH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| WINTER, CHAIM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| WINTER, MENACHEM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| CISSELL, KRISTA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2020 |
| LABONTE, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| ARBOR HILLS REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| MO PROPCO GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $112K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265883. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.