Seminole Care And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 96.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect the resident's current status for one (#2) of three sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The admission coordinator identified 95 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #2 had diagnoses which included right lower leg fracture, left shin fracture, chronic pain syndrome, and osteoarthritis. A care plan, dated 10/10/24, documented the resident had limited physical mobility and was non-weight bearing. A resident admission assessment, dated 10/14/24, documented the resident's cognition was intact, required substantial assistance with most ADLs, had impairment to both sides of their lower extremities, and reported their pain was almost constantly. A care plan, dated 10/18/24, documented the resident had pain. A physician order, dated 11/19/24 at 3:00 p.m., documented the resident was weight bearing as tolerated. There was no documentation the care plan was revised to reflect the change to weight bearing as tolerated. A physician order, dated 12/20/24 at 9:00 p.m., documented to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to code MDS assessments accurately for two (#30 and #57) of two sampled residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The assistant administrator identified 93 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #30 had diagnoses which included suicidal ideations, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. A physician order, dated 12/24/21, documented zolpidem tartrate (hypnotic medication) 10 mg tablet by mouth at bedtime for sleep. Physician orders, dated 03/23/24, documented Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) 200 mg tablet one time a day; and Seroquel 200 mg tablet at bedtime. An annual assessment, dated 09/11/24, documented the resident did not receive an antipsychotic or hypnotic medication while a resident. On 09/17/24 at 12:46 a.m., MDS Coordinator #2 was asked if the resident's annual assessment was coded for the use of an antipsychotic or hypnotic medication. They stated they missed it. 2. Res #57 had diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy, GERD,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to perform an entrapment risk assessment and to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to the use of bed rails for one (#49) of one resident sampled for bed rails. The administrator identified 33 residents whose beds were equipped with a bed rail of any type. Findings: A Side Rail Policy - Quarter/Assist Rail policy, dated October 2016, read in parts, .The facility will assess and input proper interventions to protect resident from injury .On admission, quarterly and with significant change of condition; the resident will have a side rail assessment completed .Licensed nurse will review the risks with resident and/or responsible party . Res #49 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, respiratory failure, and history of falls. A physician order, dated 08/11/22, documented the resident may have U-Rails to both sides of bed for mobility when entering and exiting for 90 days and then review. An annual assessment, dated 05/15/24, documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognition,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure side effect monitoring was conducted for the use of a psychotropic medication for one (#37) of five sampled residents reviewed for medications. The DON identified 44 residents received psychoactive medications. Findings: Res #37 had diagnoses which included depression. Physicians orders, dated 06/13/24, documented bupropion hydrobromide (antidepressant medication) 150 mg tablet by mouth one time a day; and Lexapro (antidepressant medication) 10 mg tablet one time a day. A care plan, revised 06/24/24, documented the resident used antidepressant medication. It documented to monitor and documented side effects every shift. There was no documentation side effects were monitored. On 09/17/24 at 11:36 a.m., the administrator, ADON, and DON were asked to locate documentation side effects were monitored for the resident. On 09/17/24 at 11:57 a.m., the DON stated side effects were not monitored. They stated the order to monitor had been discontinued.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the removal of expired medications and supplies from two of three medication storage rooms observed. The assistant administrator in training reported 93 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 09/18/24 at 9:40 a.m., the medication storage room on the skilled hall was observed with CMA #1. The following medications/supplies were observed to be expired. 6- boxes lubricant eye drops with an expiration date of 4/24, 1- V.A.C. Granufoam dressing package opened with and expiration date of 11/30/24. On 09/18/24 at 9:45 a.m., CMA #1 reported the expired medications and supplies should have been removed. On 09/18/24 at 9:54 a.m., the medication room for halls 1 and 2 were observed with CMA #2. The following medications were observd to be expired. 1- Box Ipratropium Bromide & Albuterol Sulfate 0.5mg/3mg per 3ml with a use by date of 3/10/24, 1- Box Ipratropium Bromide & Albuterol Sulfate 0.5mg/3mg per 3ml with a use by date of 5/9/24, 1- Box Ipratropium Bromide & Albuterol Sulfate 0.5mg/3mg per 3ml with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed, a care plan was completed, and a physician order was obtained for the use of a physical restraint for one (#13) of one sampled resident reviewed for physical restraints. The DON identified there were no residents with restraints Findings: A Physical Restraint policy, dated 07/26/23, documented prior to using a restraint an evaluation of the resident should be completed. It was documented a physician order for a restraint was to include the medical symptom for which the restraint was being used and the circumstance in which the restraint was applied. It was documented a comprehensive care plan should address the goal for the use of the restraint. Res #13 had diagnoses which included muscle weakness, cognitive communication, lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, and a history of falling. An inventory sheet of personal items, dated 03/26/24, documented the resident had an electric wheelchair. A safety device tool, dated 06/26/24, documented the resident had no safety device…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0800 — pattern
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide meals in a timely manner. The DON identified 90 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings: A Meals and Snacks policy, dated 03/31/21, documented meals shall be scheduled to ensure a maximum of 14 hours from dinner to breakfast on the following day. A schedule of meal times, updated 01/15/24, documented the following meal service times: 8:00 a.m. breakfast, 12:00 p.m. lunch, and 5:00 p.m. dinner. On 01/23/24 at 8:58 a.m., Res # 5 was observed sitting in their room eating breakfast. Res #5 stated meals are often served late which have resulted in food being colder than they preferred. On 01/23/24 at 9:06 a.m., Res #4 was observed lying in bed eating breakfast. Res #4 stated they ate some meals in their room and went to the dining room for other meals. They stated most meals are served at least an hour or longer past the scheduled meal times. Res #4 stated the meals were often cold by the time they received their meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to pressure ulcers for one (#3) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The DON identified three residents with pressure ulcers. Findings: Resident #3 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and chronic heart failure. A pressure ulcer risk assessment, dated 11/11/23, documented the resident was at moderate risk for development of a pressure ulcer. An admission assessment, dated 11/18/23, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required substantial to maximum assistance with walking and most activities of daily living. The assessment documented the resident did not have a pressure ulcer/injury upon admission. A nurse note, dated 11/22/23, documented a fluid filled purple discoloration to the left heel and purple/red discoloration to the right heel. The note documented the physician was notified and treatment orders were received. A physician order, dated 11/22/23, documented heel protectors in place at all times and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed for one (#3) of one sampled resident reviewed for discharge. The DON identified 21 residents who had discharged home in the last three months. Findings: Res #3 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic heart failure, cerebral infarction, and dementia. A discharge assessment, dated 12/22/23, documented an unplanned discharge with return not anticipated. A nurse note, dated 12/22/23 at 2:58 p.m., read in part, .Resident discharge to home with home health, all medications and belongings sent home with wife, PCP notified of discharge . There was no documentation a discharge summary had been completed. On 01/24/24 at 11:50 a.m., the social services director stated they completed most of the discharge summaries for discharged residents. They stated they had not completed the discharge summary for Res #3. On 01/25/24 at 8:45 a.m., the DON stated the discharge summary for Res #3 had not been completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the use of physical restraints for two (#4 and #21) of two sampled residents reviewed for restraints. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/30/23, documented 93 residents resided in the facility. It was documented there were no residents who were physically restrained. Findings: 1. Res #4 had diagnoses which include traumatic brain injury. A physician order, dated 02/23/22, documented U-rail on both sides of the bed for mobility assistance. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/12/23, documented the resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers. It was documented a bed rail was used daily as a restraint. On 08/30/23 at 10:14 a.m., their was one U-rail observed on the resident's bed. On 08/31/23 at 8:33 a.m., the DON was asked if there were any residents who had bed rails as physical restraints in the facility. They stated, No. On 08/31/23 at 9:32 a.m., LPN #4 was asked about the resident's mobility. They stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $919K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK