No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage Villa Care & Rehab Center

1244 Woodland Loop Drive, Bartlesville, OK 74006 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (918) 335-3222 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (918) 335-3222 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Aug 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$8,278 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4100 SE Adams Rd Ste A-100 · (918) 331-9922 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4000 Se Green Country Rd · (918) 333-6910 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4000 Se Green Country Rd · (918) 894-7674 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2400 SE Adams Blvd · (918) 331-8031 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3700 Woodland Rd · (918) 333-6022

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.0%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.4%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.4%3.4%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.0%13.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.3%25.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.9%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.0%17.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.6%17.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.8%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine52.5%74.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%27.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit28.6%16.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.642.311.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.162.961.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

28.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

28.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF28.1%CMS range 18.6–41.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.0–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.9–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.21
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
55.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 87.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.81 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-14)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a certified nurse aide did not attempt to transfer a resident from a bed to a wheelchair by themselves for a resident that required a two person lift for one (#16) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The DON stated there were 19 residents at the facility that required two staff members for transfers. Findings: A facility policy titled Fall Management, read in part, To provide an environment that remains as free of accident hazards as possible. The Facility will complete a Morse Fall Scale Evaluation on Residents to determine who are at risk for falling and to develop appropriate interventions to provide supervision and assistive devices to prevent to minimize further Falls and/or reduce injuries. Resident #16 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis. A care plan intervention, dated 08/05/24, documented the resident required the assistance of two staff members when transferred. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/11/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives were provided with a written notice of transfer prior to transferring to an acute care hospital for 3 (#1, 4, and #7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for discharges.The DON identified 64 residents had been transferred from the facility to a hospital on and between 02/14/25 and 08/14/25.Findings:A facility policy titled Discharge/Transfer-Involuntary, dated 11/01/18, read in part, If transferred to another health care facility upon order of the physician, a transfer form is completed, and a copy is sent with the resident.1.A progress note for Res #1, created date 03/27/25 at 4:39 p.m., written by the administrator, showed they were called to the facility on [DATE] at 10:55 a.m. by the ADON who reported Res #1 was being aggressive. The note showed Res #1 had been transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE].On 08/13/25 at 9:30 a.m., the DON was asked what information was sent with a resident when they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff announced their presence in a resident's room while the resident was using the bathroom for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for dignity.The DON reported 77 residents resided at the facility.Findings:An undated facility policy titled Resident Rights, read in part, Prior to entering a resident room, always knock and identify yourself. CNA #1's signature was written on the bottom of the policy document under a statement of acknowledgment and agreement to comply with the policy. CNA #1's signature was dated 10/06/23.An undated facility training document titled Course Results Report showed CNA #1 had completed and passed a training course on resident rights on 02/25/25.A progress note for Res #2, dated 02/25/25 at 6:28 p.m., showed the resident had been angry about something that occurred in their bathroom and the resident threatened to contact the state about whatever had occurred. The note showed the resident repeatedly told staff members to leave them alone before they did so.On 08/14/25 at 7:27 a.m., CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed following the discovery of an injury of unknown origin for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin.The administrator identified one resident with an injury of unknown in the past six months.Findings:Res #3's progress notes were reviewed for the period 04/01/25 through 04/31/25. The review showed no documentation of a bruise having been found on Res #3.A skin assessment for Res #3, dated 04/11/25, conducted by LPN #2, showed the resident did not have a bruise on their forehead at that time.An undated incident report showed Res #3 had been found to have a bruise on their forehead and the injury was of an unknown origin. A time stamp on the incident report showed the Oklahoma State Department of Health had received the incident report on 04/12/25.A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 04/29/25, read in part, The facility will initiate an investigation at the time of any finding of potential abuse or neglect to determine cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a head-to-toe physical assessment after being found to have an injury of unknown origin for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin.The administrator identified one resident who was found to have an injury of unknown origin from 03/01/25 through 08/13/25.Findings:An addendum to a final incident report written by the facility administrator, dated 05/15/25, showed the administrator had become aware of Res #3's bruised forehead on 04/12/25, after a family member of the resident showed the bruise to them.On 08/14/25 at 10:35 a.m., the DON was asked for the progress notes related to the bruise found on Res #3's forehead on 04/12/25. They stated they did not know why, but there were no progress notes regarding the resident's bruise. They stated there were no skin assessments for that day in Res #3's medical record. The were asked who the nurse on duty was that day. The DON stated LPN #1 was on duty that day.On 08/14/25 at 10:40 a.m., LPN # 1 was asked if they had been on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received medications as prescribed by a nurse practitioner for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The DON identified 77 residents were prescribed and administered medications in the facility.Findings:A facility policy titled Physician Orders, dated 09/28/22, read in part, To provide guidance and ensure Physician Orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with Professional Standards, State and Federal Guideline, .Physician orders shall be provided by Licensed Practitioners (Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, and Physician's Assistants) authorized to prescribe Orders.A medication order written by NP#1, dated 03/20/25, showed Res #1's Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) order was to be decreased to 25mg at bedtime and Trazadone (an antidepressant medication) 50mg at bedtime was to be started as a new medicine for the resident.A March 2025 MAR for Res #1 showed on 03/20/25, 03/21/25, and 03/22/25 the resident had been administered Seroquel 50mg once daily at bedtime…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge MDS assessment was transmitted in the required time frame for one (#76) of 27 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The administrator stated 82 residents resided at the facility at the time of entry. Findings: A facility policy titled MDS 3.0, dated 04/25/19, read in part, The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized comprehensive assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified facilities mandated by federal law (P.L.100-203) to be completed and electronically transmitted to CMS in compliance with the guidelines provided in the MDS 3.0 RAI User's Manual. An admission record found in the electronic health record of Resident #76 documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A minimum data set discharge reporting form, dated 09/20/24, documented Resident #76 discharged from the facility on 09/20/24 and was not anticipated to return. A review of Resident #76's electronic health record revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for insulin administration for one (#31) of one sampled resident reviewed for insulin administration. The DON reported 19 residents received insulin. Findings: Resident #31 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and major depressive disorder. A physician order, dated 04/10/23, documented Resident #31 was to receive insulin aspart per a sliding scale. For a blood sugar between 150 and 175 the resident was to receive one unit of insulin. For a blood sugar between 176 and 200 the resident was to receive two units of insulin. For a blood sugar of 201 to 225 they were to receive three units of insulin. On 01/13/25 at 11:07 a.m., LPN #1 was observed performing a finger stick blood sugar on Resident #31. The residents blood sugar was 213 milligrams per deciliter. LPN # was then observed to inject two units of insulin subcutaneously into Resident #31's abdomen. On 01/13/25 at 11:20 a.m., LPN #1 stated according to the sliding scale order, the resident should have received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided education on the use of bed rails and given the option to consent or decline the use of bed rails prior to their attachment to the bed for one (#72) four sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 16 residents had bed rails attached to their assigned beds. Findings: Resident #72 had diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy. A care plan focus for ADL self-care deficit, dated 06/07/24, documented an intervention on 09/15/24 was bilateral U rails were to be used to assist the resident with positioning. A Safety Device Evaluation Tool, dated 10/11/24, documented Resident #72 had an assist bar attached to their bed. A MDS five day assessment, dated 11/28/24, documented the resident was cognitively intact. On 01/12/25 at 10:03 a.m., Resident #72 was observed in bed. The bed was observed to have grab bar type rails (referred to as U rails) attached to each side of their bed about shoulder level. The resident stated they did not recall anyone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure involuntary movement assessments were completed for a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication for one (#31) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON reported eight residents received antipsychotic medications. Findings: Resident #31 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder and repeated falls. A care plan intervention, initiated 04/27/23, read in part, EPS: Assess for EPS, TD, psuedoparkinsonism. A quarterly assessment, dated 10/31/24, documented Resident #31 routinely received an antipsychotic medication. A physician order, dated 12/12/24, documented the resident was to receive aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medication) 2.5 mg by mouth every day. On 01/13/25 at 11:48 a.m., the DON stated they did not complete involuntary movement assessments for residents receiving antipsychotic medications.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain comfortable air temperatures in resident rooms for two (#3 and #8) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for air temperatures. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/18/23, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Homelike Environment policy, dated 02/01/16, read in part, .The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include .Comfortable temperatures . 1. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included paraplegia, depression, and anxiety. A Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated 08/09/23, documented severe cognitive impairment. On 09/18/23 at 3:29 p.m., Resident #3 stated the room was too cold. They stated they hoped the room would be warm enough soon. The resident was observed with a sheet and three blankets on in bed. On 09/19/23 at 8:54 a.m., Resident #3's room temperature was observed to be 66 degrees Fahrenheit. The resident stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. monitor the amount of meals a resident who experienced weight loss consumed for one (#43); and b. provide a physician ordered health shake with breakfast for one (#43) of one sampled resident reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/18/23, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #43 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Physician Order, dated 10/03/21, documented regular diet, mechanical soft texture, regular consistency with thin liquids. A Significant Change Resident Assessment, dated 07/31/23, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, and required supervision, setup help only for the task of eating. The July 2023 Amount of Meal Eaten record documented: a. blanks 48 out of 93 opportunities and b. na 18 out of 93 opportunities. A Nutrition/Dietary Note, dated 08/18/23, documented Resident #43 had experienced a significant weight loss of 11 percent over three months and 16 percent weight loss in six months. It documented a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate account of controlled medications was maintained for three (#62, 175, and #176) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication storage. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/18/23, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Controlled Substance Disposal policy, dated 04/18, read in parts, Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record keeping in the facility in accordance with federal, state and other applicable laws and regulations . On 09/20/23 at 10:04 a.m., CMA #2 was asked what the process was for removing a discontinued controlled medication from circulation. They stated they would pull the narcotic card and the narcotic sheet, take them to the DON, and log them into the double lock narcotic book. The CMA stated together they would drop it in the drop slot so there was always two people with it in the medication room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure a physician provided a reason for disagreeing with a pharmacy GDR for one (#28); b. ensure a resident who received psychotropic medications received a gradual dose reduction in a timely manner for one (#15); and c. a prn psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days and had an end date for one (#3) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/18/23, documented 51 residents received psychoactive medications. Findings: The Psychotropic Management Guidelines policy, dated 07/26/23, read in part, .Residents who use Psychotropic Drugs receive a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) and Behavioral Interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, to discontinue these Drugs .PRN Orders Psychotropic Drugs are limited to 14 days and should not be renewed unless the Attending Physician/Prescriber evaluated the Resident for appropriateness of that Medication .Prescribers should document their rationale in the Resident's Medical Record and indicate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide hot and palatable meals for six (#10, 19, 20, 31, 62, and #65) of six sampled residents reviewed for hot and palatable meals. The Administrator identified 70 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: The Food Holding and Service policy, revised 06/01/2019, read in part, .Serve all hot foods at a temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit or greater .Adjust the temperature to account for the time the food will be held prior to service on the steam table and on the tray carts . 1. On 09/18/23 at 11:03 a.m., [NAME] #1 provided extended lunch menu. The lunch menu for 09/18/23 had baked pork chop, mushroom rice, sliced zucchini, garlic cheese bread, margarine, salt and pepper packets, choice of beverage, and water. On 09/18/23 at 1:04 p.m., the last resident hall tray was served. On 09/18/23 at 1:06 p.m., a test tray was delivered with one piece of pork chop, a small bowl of Zucchini, rice, cheese biscuit, and 2 individual packets of butter. There was a slice of lemon cake on the side. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner for one of one meal service observed; and b. failed to prevent bare hand contact with resident food for one (#43) of four sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The Administrator identified 70 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: The Employee Sanitation policy, dated 10/01/18, read in part, .Cups, glasses and bowls must be handled so that fingers or thumbs do not contact inside surfaces or lip-contact outer surfaces . The FOOD HANDLING & USE OF GLOVES policy, revised 08/16/23, read in part, .When donning gloves, hands must be washed first. Once gloves are donned, one job should be completed. When changing jobs or major tasks, gloves should be removed and discarded. New gloves should be put on after hands are washed . 1. Resident #43 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Significant Change Resident Assessment, dated 07/31/23, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, and required supervision, setup help only…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility to ensure residents were assisted with dining in a dignified manner for one (#43) of four sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/18/23, documented 23 residents were independent, 46 residents required the assistance of one or two staff members, and four residents were dependent on staff for the task of eating. Findings: A Nutrition and Foodservice policy, dated 10/01/18, read in part, .The facility believes that all residents would be treated with dignity and respect at all times. A respectful, positive dining experience is essential to the residents' quality of life and helps to identify residents' needs and improve their overall nutritional status . Resident #43 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Significant Change Resident Assessment, dated 07/31/23, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, and required supervision, setup help only for the task of eating. On 09/20/23 at 12:55 p.m., CNA #1 walked over to Resident #43 took a scoop of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided while performing a finger stick for blood sugar reading and while administering insulin to one (#50) of three sampled residents observed for insulin administration. The Resident Roster Matrix report, undated, documented 15 residents received insulin. Findings: An Administration Procedures For All Medications policy, dated 04/18, read in part, .Provide privacy for resident during administration of medication . Resident #50 had diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, and hyperglycemia. On 09/20/23 at 7:57 a.m., LPN #2 was observed to perform a FSBS on Resident #50 in the dining room. There were 11 other residents present in the dining room at the time. On 09/20/23 at 8:02 a.m., LPN #2 was observed administering Resident #50's insulin to their right arm in the dining room. On 09/02/23 at 8:04 a.m., LPN #2 was asked what the policy and procedure was for medication administration in the dining room. They stated to make sure they had the right patient, right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not involuntarily discharged while an appeal order was pending for one (#219) of one sampled residents reviewed for involuntary discharge. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/18/23, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. The Administrator identified one resident who had been given a 30-day discharge notice from the facility in the past 12 months. Findings: The DISCHARGE/TRANSFER-INVOLUNTARY policy, dated 11/01/18, read in part, .The facility must permit each resident to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless specific criteria, as outlined below, are met .The facility will provide sufficient orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility including an opportunity to participate in the decision of where to transfer .Involuntary discharge will be effected after the minimum notice requirements prescribed by applicable law and regulation, or thirty day notice if no state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed after a discharge for one (#169) of three sampled resident reviewed for discharge. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/18/23, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #169 had diagnoses which included history of falls, dementia, anxiety, type two diabetes mellitus, and age related debility. An incomplete Oklahoma Human Services notification regarding a patient in a long term care facility form, signed on 11/04/22, documented Resident #169's Family transferred resident out. On 09/21/23 at 8:51 a.m., the DON was asked the reason the resident was discharged from the facility. They stated they had no idea. The DON was asked what the procedure was when a resident discharges from the facility. They stated, depending on the discharge, the nurses would complete a discharge summary, and then the social services director would complete their discharge summary. On 09/21/23 at 8:53 a.m., the DON was asked where Resident #169's discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. residents were provided assistance with eating in a timely manner for one (#43); and b. residents were provided assistance with hygiene, eating, and bathing for one (#169) of four sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/18/23, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. It documented 23 residents were independent, 46 residents required the assistance of one or two staff members, and four residents were dependent on staff for the task of eating. Findings: A Nutrition and Foodservice policy, dated 10/01/18, read in part, .Residents who require dining assistance will not have their trays delivered until a staff member is available to assist with dining .Residents eating in their rooms will be provided assistance as needed. Residents who require dining assistance will not be delivered a meal tray until a staff member is available to assist the resident with eating . 1. Resident #43 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not experience a significant medication error when a long acting insulin was administered instead of the short acting insulin ordered for one (#50) of three sampled residents observed for insulin administration. The Resident Roster Matrix, undated, documented 15 residents who received insulin resided in the faciilty. Findings: An Administration procedures for all medications policy, dated 04/18, read in part, .Review 5 rights (3) times: Prior to removing the medication package container from the cart/drawer, .Check MAR/TAR for order .Prior to removing the medication from the container .Check the label against the order on the MAR . Resident #50 had diagnoses which included type 2 diabetic neuropathy, type two diabetes mellitus, and hyperglycemia. A physician order, dated 03/21/23, documented to administer insulin detemir solution six units at bedtime. A physician order, dated, 07/17/23, documented to administer Humalog three units before meals. A physician order, dated 07/17/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurate for one (#43) of one sampled resident reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/18/23, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #43 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Physician Order, dated 08/23/23, documented health shakes with meals. The September 2023 MAR documented the resident received a health shake with their morning meal on 09/19/23. On 09/19/23 at 8:24 a.m., CNA #3 delivered a meal tray to Resident #43. They stated the resident's name several times, stated they had breakfast for them, placed the meal tray on the bedside table, turned on the light, and opened the tray. The only liquid observed on the tray was a brown liquid in a tall cup. There was no health shake observed on the tray. Resident #43's meal service was observed until they received the last bite of food at 10:14 a.m. No health shake was provided with the resident's meal. On 09/19/23 at 10:19 a.m., CNA #3 was asked to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure used linens were not placed on the floor during incontinent care for one (#12) of three sampled residents observed for incontinent care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/18/23, documented 40 residents were occasionally or frequently incontinent of bladder, and 31 residents were occasionally or frequently incontinent of bowel. Findings: A Handling of Linen policy, dated 09/19, read in part, .The facility strives to reduce the risk of infection to the resident/patient and employees .All soiled linen will be bagged and/or placed in containers at the location where it is used . Resident #12 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer disease and dementia, A Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated 08/02/23, documented Resident #12 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 09/20/23 at 9:42 a.m., CNA #1 and CNA #2 were observed transferring Resident #12 to the bed from the geriatric chair using a mechanical lift. On 09/20/23 at 9:45 a.m., CNA #3 obtained a grey container with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the ice machine and scoop bucket were maintained in a sanitary manner. The dietary manager identified 65 residents who received ice from the machine. Findings: The facility's procedure for the ice machine, dated 09/2018, documented, The ice machine, scoop, and storage container will be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. The ice machine will be cleaned once per month or more often as needed. The scoop and storage container will be cleaned once per day. 1. On 04/19/21 at 10:24 a.m., cook #1 was asked to open the locked ice machine. The surveyor used a clean paper towel and wiped across the upper metal housing of the inside of the ice machine. Multiple black specks came off onto the paper towel. On 04/19/21 at 10:30 a.m., the dietary manager was asked who was responsible to clean the ice machine. She stated maintenance cleaned it. She was asked if they told her when they would clean it. She stated no. She was asked if they had a schedule to clean it. She stated she did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-04-28 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the QAPI program made good faith attempts to identify and correct quality deficiencies. The facility identified 65 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: On 04/26/21 at 10:33 a.m., the administrator was asked prior to the survey if the facility had identified and developed a QAA plan for the RAI process. He stated, no. He was asked prior to the survey if the facility had identified and developed a QAA plan for the restorative care. He stated, no. He was asked prior to the survey if the facility had identified and developed a QAA plan for elopement. He stated, no. He was asked prior to the survey if the facility had identified and developed a QAA plan for ADLs. He stated, no. He stated, currently they are working on that. He stated it was coming in place. He stated, the facility staff were getting the audits done right now, then they will collect the audits, and we will meet as a team and develop a plan. (The facility had F677 ADL care provided for dependent residents deficiency cited on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-04-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have complete documentation of the seasonal influenza vaccine and the pneumococcal vaccine, for three (#11, #1, and #59) of five residents sampled for immunizations. The facility identified 65 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. An influenza vaccine consent form for resident #11 documented the POA refused the vaccine on 9/28/20. The form had a vaccine sticker with lot number TM72J attached to the form. The form included a nurse's signature with a date of 12/08/20. There was no documentation provided regarding the pneumococcal vaccine. 2. An influenza vaccine consent form for resident #15, dated 12/09/20, documented the influenza vaccine was given but had no documentation on the form indicating the screening questions were asked. The consent form had no documentation on the time the vaccine was given. The vaccine form contained no signature or date of the resident or POA consenting to the vaccine. A consent form for the pneumococcal vaccine was produced but had no documentation if the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-04-28 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to: ~ ensure all staff were routinely tested for COVID-19; and ~ ensure outbreak testing was conducted until 14 days of no new positive COVID-19 cases had been achieved. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Review of the COVID-19 employee testing log did not reveal documentation the administrator had been tested for COVID-19 since 03/29/21. On 04/27/21 at 2:38 p.m., the administrator was asked if he had any documentation of being tested for COVID-19 during April 2021. He stated he thought he had been tested. On 04/28/21 at 10:45 a.m., the DON stated she had not found documentation the administrator had been tested for COVID-19 for April 2021. 2. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included COVID-19. A nurse's note, dated 01/08/21, documented the resident was experiencing elevated temperature, urine frequency, pain, decreased appetite, and was sent to the hospital. A hospital laboratory report, dated 01/08/21, documented the resident was positive for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure survey results were accessible to residents/visitors. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/20/21 at 10:48 a.m., a resident group meeting was conducted. The three residents in attendance were asked if they knew where survey results were located for their viewing if desired. They all three stated they did not know where the survey results were located. On 04/21/21 at 11:18 a.m., a sign on the counter at the nurses' station documented the survey results were available here. The survey results were not observed on the nurses' station counter. On 04/21/21 at 11:22 a.m., LPN #1 was asked where the survey results were located. She stated they were usually in a big, black book. She stated the book had been moved and she would try to locate it. At 11:25 a.m., the administrator was observed looking for the survey results behind the nurses' station. LPN #1 delivered the book to the surveyor at the nurses' station. She was asked where the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide facility failed to provide liability and appeals notices as required for three (#25, #29, and #64) of three sampled residents for liability and appeals notices. The BOM identified 23 residents had been discharged from skilled services in the last six months. Findings: On 04/20/21 at 10:05 a.m., asked the SSD to complete the SNF beneficiary protection notification review form for the three sampled residents. The SSD was asked to provide the surveyor with the liability and appeals notices if provided for three residents. On 04/20/21 at 10:22 a.m., the SSD returned the SNF beneficiary protection notification review forms. The form for resident #64 documented the resident started Medicare Part A skilled services on 11/13/20 and ended on 12/21/20. The form documented the SNFABN and NOMNC had been provided. The Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage form documented the reason medicare may not pay for the Part A care as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #33 had diagnoses which included rheumatoid arthritis and spondylitis. The resident's clinical record contained a quarterly assessment, dated 12/20/20. The resident's next assessment to be completed, an annual assessment, dated 03/12/21, documented a status of pending. Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were conducted in a timely manner for two (#23 and #33) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the electronic clinical record for resident #23 revealed the last completed comprehensive assessment was an admission assessment with an assessment reference date of 03/30/20. On 04/27/21 at 4:39 p.m., the electronic record revealed an annual assessment was in progress. The assessment reference date of the annual assessment was 03/31/21. On 04/27/21 at 5:30 p.m., the MDS nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed every three months for four (#11, #20, #29, and #35) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The facility identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease and need for assistance with personal care. The resident's clinical record contained a significant change assessment dated [DATE]. The resident's next assessment to be completed was a quarterly assessment. The resident's clinical record contained a quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. The quarterly assessment's status had a pending documented. 2. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included hypertension, Alzheimer's Disease, hemiplegia, and muscle weakness. The resident's clinical record contained the previous quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. The resident's next assessment to be completed was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet the needs of residents for four (#20, #23, #29, and #52) of 22 sampled residents whose comprehensive care plans were reviewed. The facility identified 65 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #20 had diagnoses which included unspecified injury at C4 level of cervical spinal cord, hemiplegia, and muscle wasting and atrophy. The resident's care plan, dated 03/07/19, did not document the resident's preferred activities. The care plan documented she would exercise the right to not participate in structured activities. The care plan goal was for the resident to verbalize satisfaction with the number and variety of structured and independent activities she had participated in. The care plan documented the resident would be provided a monthly calendar. A significant change assessment, dated 02/24/20, documented the resident was cognitively intact; and the resident's activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have a qualified activities director. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/20/21 at 10:58 a.m., resident #20 was asked how the activities were at the facility. She stated they were pretty good until they lost their activity director approximately two and a half weeks ago. On 04/21/21 at 4:20 p.m., the resident was asked what activities she had done. She stated there had not been any activities. She stated she was going to ask the dietary manager (after her vacation) to call Bingo. Random observations throughout the survey did not reveal activities were provided. The activity calendar posted in the facility was dated for March 2021. On 04/26/21 at 10:51 a.m., CNA #1 was asked who provided activities. She stated no one because the facility did not have an activity director. She was asked how long the facility had been without an activity director. She stated approximately one month. On 04/27/21 at 11:28 a.m., the administrator was asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents with limited ROM received treatment and services to prevent further decrease or maintain ROM for three (#20, #23, and #52) for three sampled residents reviewed for ROM/restorative services. The facility identified three residents with contractures. Findings: 1. Resident #23 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia; traumatic brain injury; and contractures of bilateral shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, and knees. An admission assessment, dated 03/30/20, documented the resident required extensive assistance with ADLs and had range of motion impairment on both sides of her upper and lower extremities. A care plan, updated 01/17/21, documented, .I am on the restorative program and we work on wearing my splints . A restorative nursing flow sheet, dated February 2021, documented the last day restorative services had been provided was 02/25/21. A therapy to restorative nursing communication form, dated 03/05/21, documented, .PT/OT/ST Recommendations: PROM of upper & low body in all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments and physician's orders for dialysis were completed for one (#16) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified three residents who received dialysis. Findings: A policy titled Hemodialysis: Out of Facility Provider, dated October 2016, documented, .Responsibility of the Long Term Care Provider .The facility will maintain a medical record that includes documentation of dialysis treatments. The resident's nurse will be responsible for utilizing the dialysis communication form and/or receiving verbal report from the dialysis provider following a dialysis treatment .Predialysis Care .Assess vital signs .Document care in the medical record .Record weight .Assess the vascular access site to assess for thrill .Assess vascular access site for sign/symptom of infection .Document in medical record .Palpate vascular access site to assess for thrill .Document in the medical record .Postdialysis Care .Assess and document vital signs, weight,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the DON did not work as a charge nurse when the resident census was 60 or greater. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Review of the 04/2021 detailed facility census report documented the resident daily census was as follows: ~ 04/14/21 the resident census was 68; ~ 04/15/21 the resident census was 66; ~ 04/17/21 the resident census was 66; and ~ 04/18/21 the resident census was 65. On 04/27/21 at 4:30 p.m., the DON reported she had worked as a charge nurse several days since becoming the DON. She stated herself and LPN #4 had worked together as charge nurses on those days. She stated she had done what she needed to do to take care of the residents. She stated she had been the DON for two weeks. She was asked what days she had worked as a charge nurse. She stated she would check. On 04/28/21 at 1:21 p.m., the DON stated she had worked as a charge nurse on 04/14/21, 04/15/21, 04/17/21, and 04/18/21. She was asked if she was the DON on the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs had received performance/competency reviews yearly for five (CNA #2, #3, #4, #6, and CNA #7) of five employee files reviewed for NA competency reviews. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/28/21 at 10:23 a.m., corporate RN #1 was asked if the facility had completed yearly CNA competency reviews. She stated they had a skills checklist. She was asked for the skills checklist for CNA #2, #3, #4, #6, and CNA #7. On 04/28/21 at 10:42 a.m., the administrator provided the surveyor a blank CNA annual skill evaluation form. He stated the yearly skills evaluation forms had not be completed for the CNAs.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were complete and accurate for five (#1, #10, #52, #57, and #60) of 24 sampled resident whose records were reviewed. The DON identified 65 residents in the facility with medical records. Findings: 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the behavior and side effect monitoring flow sheets, dated February 2021, revealed the following: ~ Behavior and side effect monitoring was documented for 23 out of 28 opportunities for the day shift. Review of the behavior and side effect monitoring flow sheets, dated March 2021, revealed the following; ~ Behavior and side effect monitoring was documented for 12 out of 31 opportunities for the day shift. Review of the behavior and side effect monitoring flow sheets, 04/01/21 through 04/21/21, revealed the following: ~ Behavior and side effect monitoring was documented for two out of 21 opportunities for the day shift. 2. Resident #10 had diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the QAA committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct quality deficiencies. The facility identified 65 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: On 04/26/21 at 10:33 a.m., the administrator was asked prior to the survey if the facility had identified and developed a QAA plan for the RAI process. He stated, no. He was asked prior to the survey if the facility had identified and developed a QAA plan for the restorative care. He stated, no. He was asked prior to the survey if the facility had identified and developed a QAA plan for elopement. He stated, no. He was asked prior to the survey if the facility had identified and developed a QAA plan for ADLs. He stated, no. He stated, currently they are working on that. He stated it was coming in place. He stated, the facility staff were getting the audits done right now, then they will collect the audits, and we will meet as a team and develop a plan. (The facility had F677 ADL care provided for dependent residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program to prevent potential infections for four (#1, #11, #29, and #55) of 21 sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to: a. ensure catheter care was provided in a manner to prevent UTIs for resident #11, b. ensure indwelling urinary catheter bags(privacy bags) and tubing did not touch the floor for residents #1, #29, and #55, and c. ensure tracking and trending of infections were monitored and analyzed with steps taken to prevent further infections on a monthly basis. This had the potential to affect the 65 residents who resided at the facility. The facility identified 65 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: The facility's catheter urinary care and maintenance procedure, dated effective 03/2019, r/t catheter care, documented, - To cleanse the entire perineal with soap and water or premoistened wipe. - For a male - cleanse from urethra…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to accurately complete an annual assessment for one (#57) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed for accuracy. Findings: Resident #57 had diagnoses which included paraplegia and neurogenic bladder. An annual assessment, dated 06/10/20, documented the resident was cognitively intact, required a two person hoyer assist for most ADLs, had impairment on both sides of the lower extremities, used a wheelchair for mobility, and had an indwelling urinary catheter, urinary continence not rated. A care plan, dated 01/14/21, documented a care area of impaired mobility due to paraplegia with interventions of no ambulation, total assist with hoyer, and required assistance as needed. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/13/21, documented the resident was cognitively intact, required the assist of two for most ADLs; balance during transitions was not steady but able to stabilize with staff assistance for moving from seated to standing, walking, turning around and surface to surface transfer; had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to address a resident's elopement risk in the baseline care plan for one (#114) of one newly admitted resident who was at risk for elopement whose baseline was reviewed. The facility identified two residents who were at risk for elopement. Findings: The facility's elopement prevention and management program, dated effective 07/2018, documented, .Develop individualized interventions . Review and revise Interdisciplinary Plan of Care (IPOC) as needed . The facility's elopement prevention procedure, dated effective 07/2018, documented, .Include resident/patient and family in development of the Plan of Care . The facility's elopement program algorithm, dated effective 07/2018, documented, if the resident is an elopement risk, evaluate the contributing factors, identify prevention interventions, and develop plan of care for elopement. The resident's baseline care plan, dated 12/22/20, documented the resident was an elopement risk, a wanderguard was in place, and to implement the elopement prevention protocol. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to review/revise resident care plans for two (#11 and #29) of 22 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility identified 65 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease and need for assistance with personal care. A significant change assessment, dated 11/12/20, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required assistance of staff with most ADLs, had a indwelling urinary catheter, had pain, and had lost 5% or more weight. The resident's care plan, dated 10/02/20, documented the next target (review) date was 02/28/21. The care plan had not been reviewed after the 11/12/20 significant change assessment. The resident's care plan did not address his weight loss. On 04/27/21 at 12:36 p.m., corporate RN #1 was asked if the resident's current care plan had been reviewed/revised. She reviewed the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an activity program that met residents preferences and/or needs for two (#20, and #29) of five sampled residents reviewed for activities. The facility identified 65 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #20 had diagnoses which included unspecified injury at C4 level of cervical spinal cord, hemiplegia and muscle wasting & atrophy. The resident's care plan, dated 03/07/19, did not document the resident's preferred activities. The care plan documented she would exercise her right to not participate in structured activities. The care plan goal for the resident was to verbalize satisfaction with the number and variety of structured and independent activities she had participated in. The care plan documented the resident would be provided a monthly calendar. A significant change assessment, dated 02/24/20, documented the resident was cognitively intact; the resident's activity preferences that were very important to her were for her to choose her clothes; take care of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter received appropriate care and services for one (#11) of seven sampled residents whose indwelling urinary catheters were reviewed. The facility identified seven residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Findings: The facility's catheter urinary care and maintenance procedure, dated effective 03/2019, r/t catheter care, documented, - To cleanse the entire perineal with soap and water or premoistened wipe. - For a male - cleanse from urethra outward. Retract foreskin of uncircumcised male, cleanse, and replace foreskin. - Hold and support catheter to avoid traction/unnecessary movement. - Gently cleanse the urethral/catheter junction. - Gently cleans about three inches of the catheter from the urethra outward avoiding traction. - Rinse thoroughly and gently dry. - Check that the catheter is attached to the thigh or abdomen (male) as ordered. Resident #11 had diagnoses which included BPH and Alzheimer's Disease. A care plan, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacy consultations/recommendations were addressed by the physician for one (#1) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. A pharmacy consultation report, dated 02/09/21, documented, .Please note CMS guidelines implemented in November 2017 advise against the use of an 'as needed' or PRN psychotropic agents .for longer than 14 consecutive days without physician evaluation and justification for continued use .This patient has such an order: Ativan 0.5 mg every 4 hours as needed for anxiety. Unless clinically contraindicated, please consider discontinuing this medication and re-evaluating clinical necessity. If continued PRN use is of clinical necessity and the patient's condition would be compromised by discontinuing this order, please document as such below…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure laboratory monitoring for a medication was completed for one (#1) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified all 65 residents received medications. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. A physician's order, dated 07/31/20, documented, .Obtain Depakote & CMP Level one time a day every 6 month[s] starting on the 1st .related to GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER .MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, RECURRENT, UNSPECIFIED . A physician's order, dated 01/23/21, documented the resident was ordered Depakote delayed release tablet 125mg by mouth three times a day. A treatment administration record, dated February 2021, documented the resident refused to have the Depakote and CMP levels completed on 02/01/21. On 04/27/21 at 3:16 p.m., the DON was asked who monitored to ensure labs were completed as ordered and reported to the physician. She stated the charge nurses. She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure antianxiety medications were not ordered for more than 14 days for one (#1) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified ten residents who received antianxiety medications. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. An annual assessment, dated 01/27/21, documented the resident had received an antianxiety medication for seven of seven days during the look back period. Review of the MARs, dated February through April 2021, documented, .Ativan 2MG/ML [LORazepam] Give 0.25 mg/ml sublingually every 4 hours as needed for Anxiety -Start Date- 02/02/2021 1045 -D/C Date- 04/21/2021 1435 . The MARs documented the resident had received the Ativan prn February through April 2021. Review of the clinical record did not reveal physician justification for continuing the Ativan on an as needed basis longer than 14 days. On 04/28/21 at 1:23 p.m., the DON was asked what the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-28 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided radiology services as ordered by the physician for one (#11) of three sampled residents who were reviewed who had radiology services. The facility identified 65 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #11 had diagnoses which included CVA and dysphagia. A significant change assessment, dated 11/12/20, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required assistance with ADLs, and had lost 5% or more weight. A ST treatment encounter note, dated 01/07/21, documented, the ST had written a note to send to the resident's physician that the resident was having pain when swallowing. The ST documented the physician had responded with refer for EGD. A nurse's progress note, dated 01/07/21 at 6:55 a.m., documented the nurse had contacted the resident's physician about the ST requesting a gastric intestinal consult r/t weight loss and painful swallowing as well as gagging and vomiting. The physician gave a new order for a referral for an EGD. On 04/27/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-01-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Arbor Hills Care & Rehab CenterFerguson, MO 1 of 5Bentwood Nursing & RehabFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Broadway Care & Rehab CenterMuskogee, OK 1 of 5Florissant Valley Health & Rehabilitation CenterFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Lansdowne VillageSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Leisure Village Health Care CenterTulsa, OK 1 of 5Normandy Nursing CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Quarters At Des Peres, TheDes Peres, MO 1 of 5South Pointe Rehabilitation and Care CenterOklahoma City, OK 1 of 5Springfield Skilled Care CenterSpringfield, MO 1 of 5St Sophia Health & Rehabilitation CenterFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Eastgate Village Care & Rehab CenterMuskogee, OK 2 of 5Sherbrooke VillageSaint Louis, MO 2 of 5Spring Valley Health & Rehabilitation CenterSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Sunset Health Care CenterUnion, MO 2 of 5Walnut Grove Care & Rehab CenterMcAlester, OK 3 of 5Forest Hills Care And Rehabilitation CenterBroken Arrow, OK 3 of 5Fort Gibson Care & Rehab CenterFort Gibson, OK 3 of 5Oak Park Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 4 of 5Cleveland Care And Rehab CenterCleveland, OK 4 of 5Coweta Care & Rehab CenterCoweta, OK 4 of 5Jackson ManorJackson, MO 4 of 5Mitchell Care & Rehab CenterMcAlester, OK 4 of 5Rainbow Health Care Community And Rainbow AssistedBristow, OK 4 of 5Seminole Care And Rehabilitation CenterSeminole, OK 5 of 5Camelot Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFarmington, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OK SNF HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/18/2023
OK SNF INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/18/2023
JFB OK TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/18/2023
SOUTHEAST VENTURES TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST48%since 12/18/2023
ROVENSTINE, PEGGYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/18/2023
FRIEDMAN, NAFTALIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/18/2023

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$209K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 6%Other / private 22%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $209K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$255per resident / day
operating cost
$7,742per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$247per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375109. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next