Sherbrooke Village
4005 Ripa Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63125 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 149 certified beds · (314) 544-1111 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $38,520 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.2% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 5.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 29.0% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.4% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.1% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.7% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.6% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.3% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 17.2% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 38.8% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.5% | 13.7% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.89 | 2.11 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.7%CMS range 33.8–50.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.6–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.6–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.85 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 121.2 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.42 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.20 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2022-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly contain COVID-19. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy, when resident (Resident (R) 69) was identified to have COVID-19 and was in the communal area, unmasked for several hours increasing the risk of exposure for staff and other residents residing on the [NAME] Unit. The failure placed residents and staff on the [NAME] Unit at risk for exposure, contracting COVID-19, and adverse outcomes up to and including death, and to failed to ensure Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT) wore source control. On 10/24/22 at 9:00 PM, the Director of Nursing and Administrator were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F880-K Infection Control. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/24/22 when the survey team identified that R69 was sitting in the communal area, unmasked for several hours. The facility provided an acceptable removal plan on 10/25/22 at 5:12 PM. The removal plan included identifying other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation or intervention for pain management for two of two residents (Residents #118 and #2). One resident had uncontrolled pain for 20-hours after being discharged from a local hospital with a pelvic fracture. The facility did not administer any pharmacological or non-pharmacological approaches for pain control. The facility nurse did not try to get orders for pain medication from the on-call provider (Resident #118). Facility staff also failed to provide pain control interventions for one resident during a wound treatment (Resident #2). The sample was 24. The census was 121. Review of the facility's Pain Management policy dated 11/22, showed:-Policy: The Facility will use a systematic approach to Pain Management; Recognition, Evaluation, Treatment, & Monitoring of Pain. Individuals experiencing Pain may receive Pharmacological/Non-Pharmacological Interventions to assist in Pain Management. The Facility will provide Employees Education on Pain Management & Opioid Overdose.-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident was treated in a dignified manner (Resident #98), and failed to ensure staff followed the facility's cell phone policy, which affected 4 residents (Residents #12, #3, #100 and #140). The sample size was 24. The census was 121. Review of the facility's resident rights policy, dated 1/28/26, showed:-Policy: The facility shall treat residents with kindness, respect, and dignity and ensure resident rights are being followed. The resident/resident representative will be informed of their rights upon admission. Review of the facility's employment policies and procedures, undated, showed:-Personal cell phones: Use of personal cell phones or other similar devices while on duty is prohibited. Employees must understand that our first priority is the care and welfare of the residents. Use of personal cell phones is limited to breaks and meal periods. Ringers are to be silenced while on duty, and employees may not initiate or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #109), the [NAME] Hall living room carpet, and the Lodge common area were maintained in a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The sample size was 24. The census was 121.During an interview on 4/10/26 at approximately 7:00 A.M., the Administrator said the facility did not have a policy on cleaning wheelchairs or a wheelchair cleaning schedule. 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/2/26, showed:-Cognitively intact;-Used a wheelchair;-Diagnoses included heart failure, high blood pressure, and renal (kidney) failure. Observation on 4/6/26 at approximately 12:00 P.M., showed the resident sat in his/her wheelchair in his/her room. The resident's wheelchair had thick amounts of dust, food particles and hair on the wheelchair frame and wheels. During observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the transfer and discharge notices to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (resident advocate) for 11 out of 12 months. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Discharge and Transfer policy, last revised 9/17/25, showed a copy of a transfer or discharge notice must be provided to the Ombudsman. Review of the facility's admission and Discharge Report, dated 6/26/24 through 4/6/26, showed 39 residents discharged from the facility. Review of the Social Service Director's (SSD) monthly e-mails sent to the Ombudsman's office showed:-No transfer or discharge notifications were sent to the Ombudsman's office in April 2025, May 2025, June 2025, July 2025, August 2025, September 2025, October 2025, November 2025, December 2025, January 2026, and February 2026. During an interview on 4/8/26 at 2:15 P.M., the SSD said she was aware that she had missed a couple of months sending the transfer and discharge list to the Ombudsman's office. The SSD said it was her responsibility and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident received one on one activities (Resident #5) and failed to ensure two residents had activities provided (Residents #3 and #140). In addition, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided on the 300 hallway and failed to ensure activities posted on the activity calendar for the [NAME] hallway were conducted. The sample size was 24. The census was 121. Review of the facility's activities policy, dated 9/14/23, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of Activities based on their comprehensive evaluation, care plan, & preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, & dependent activities will be designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as well as encourage both independence and interaction within the facility;-Procedure: Activities will include individual, small,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely on locked medication carts, and to ensure medication and treatment carts were free from storage of personal items, expired medications, and improperly labeled medications. Five medication carts were observed and problems were found with each. The census was 121. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, dated 11/18, showed:Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel (Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurse), pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications;-Procedure: Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by people with authorized access;-AII medications dispensed by the pharmacy are stored in the container with the pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served to residents at a safe and appetizing temperature (Residents #3, # 23, #76, #100 and #140). The sample was 24. The census was 121. Review of the facility's meal service temperature log, undated, showed:-Hot food needs to maintain at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above in steamtable;-Cold food needs to maintain at 41 degrees F or below. 1. Observation on 4/8/26 at 12:56 P.M., of lunch on the memory care unit, showed:-Soup measured 126.8 degrees F;-Meatballs measured of 129.3 degrees F. Observation on 4/9/26 at 8:54 A.M., of 300 hall breakfast trays, showed:-Cream of wheat measured 80 degrees F;-Scrambled egg measured 109 degrees F;-Biscuits and gravy measured 111.1 degrees F. 2. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/30/26, showed:-Cognitively intact;-Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff exhibited appropriate infection control practices while providing feeding assistance to one resident (Resident #12). In addition, the facility failed to ensure food was served from a clean steam table on the [NAME] Hall. The sample was 24. The census was 121. 1. Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/6/26, showed:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Diagnoses included aphasia (language impairment), paraplegia (paralysis of lower portion of the body and of both legs), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), and dementia. Observations on 4/8/26, of the main dining room during lunch, showed-At 12:44 P.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) L sat next to the resident at a table in the dining room. He/She scooped up a spoonful of soup, blew on the spoonful of soup and fed it to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences by failing to ensure a call light was in reach for one resident (Resident #98). The sample was 24. The census was 121.During an interview on 4/10/26 at approximately 7:00 A.M., the Administrator said the facility did not have a call light policy. Review of Resident's # 98's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/24/26, showed:-Cognitively intact;-Dependent on staff for toileting hygiene;-Frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder;-Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a lung disease that cause the airway to become constricted and difficult to breathe. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed:-Focus: The resident has a risk of falls due to a history of falls and gait problems:-Interventions: Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice by not following physician orders for daily weights for one resident (Resident #1), and by leaving medications, including pain, blood pressure, and seizure medications in a medicine cup in the resident's room for the family member to administer (Resident #13) . The sample size was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Physician Orders policy, dated 9/28/22, showed:-Policy: To provide guidance and ensure physician orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with professional standards, state and federal guidelines. The licensed nurse is required to record the order in the electronic medical record (EMR), the physician order sheets (POS) and on the appropriate medication administration record (MAR) and treatment administration record (TAR). Review of the facility's Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated 12/17, showed: Policy: Medications are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate activity of daily living (ADL, daily care) care to meet the needs of residents by leaving one incontinent resident (Resident #98) soiled and wet for an extended period. The sample was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Perineal Care (cleansing of the genitals and anal area) policy, undated, showed:- Perineal care which includes care of the external genitalia and the anal area, should be offered during the daily bath and it the resident is incontinent for urine or stool; The procedure promotes cleanliness and prevents infection. It also removes irritating and odorous secretions. Review of Resident's # 98's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/24/26, showed:-Cognitively intact;-Dependent on staff for toileting hygiene;-Required partial to moderate assist from staff for personal hygiene;-Frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder;-Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dementia, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate treatment and services for two residents with pressure ulcers (wounds related to prolonged pressure on bony prominences) (Resident #2 and #13) and interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #23). The facility failed to provide ordered treatments and a timely wound consult for Resident #2. The facility failed to provide dressing changes when dressings were saturated, for Resident #13. The facility failed to provide Residents #13 and #23 with low air loss mattresses set to the correct settings, which would put the residents at risk for increased pressure on bony prominences. The sample size was 24. The census was 121. Review of the facility's Wound Management policy, dated 11/22, showed:-Policy: To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, the facility will provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current Standards of Practice and Physician orders;Procedure: Wound Management:-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for two residents (Residents #60 and #98). The sample was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Podiatry (foot specialty) Services policy, revised 2/16/26, showed:-Policy: The facility will assist in arranging for residents as needed;-Responsibility: Social Worker (SW) and Licensed Nurse;-Procedure: On admission and as needed, the Licensed Nurse evaluates feet and toenails for any abnormalities. The Licensed Nurse will notify the resident's medical provider of any needs for podiatry services and obtain and order for podiatry consultation. The Licensed Nurse will notify Social Services (SS) of the need for arranging podiatry services. SS will arrange for podiatry services, including transportation if needed. The Administrator will engage the services of a properly licensed podiatrist to serve facility residents. 1. Review of Resident #60's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to use a gait-belt during a transfer for one resident (Resident #93). The sample size was 24. The census was 121. Review of the facility's Gait Belt Transfer policy dated 10/22, showed:-Policy: The Facility will utilize a Gait Belt for Residents who require one assist with Transfer to promote safety during Resident Transfers;-Responsibility: Nursing Assistants, Licensed Nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Registered Nurses (RN), Nursing Administration, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Director of Nursing (DON);-Procedure:--Place Gait Belt around the Resident's waist over their clothing with the buckle forward;--Buckle/Fasten the Gait Belt;-- Slide open hand below belt to ensure the Gait Belt is snug but not too tight;-- Position your body close to the Resident; Face to Face;--Transfer Resident by firm grip on the Gait Belt with an underhand grip. Review of Resident's #98's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/24/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #74) with an external urinary collection device (a noninvasive external tube that drains the urine from the bladder) had appropriate physician orders to include catheter care instructions and monitoring. The sample was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Lippincott Nursing Procedure Book, External Urine Collection Device Use, ninth edition, page 324, published 9/2/22, showed:-External urine collection device serves as an alternative to indwelling urinary catheters (sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) in cooperative residents who don't have signs of urinary retention;-An external urine collection device designed for male residents consist of a condom catheter or other device secure to the shaft of the penis and connected to a leg bag or drainage bag;-Complications are commonly due to equipment malfunction or trauma from improper application and removal can include penile irritation, skin breakdown, swelling, ischemic (dead) tissue loss and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to be free from medication errors of less than 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 11.11% with three errors out of 27 opportunities observed. Staff failed to monitor one resident's blood pressure (BP) prior to administration of Midodrine (a medication to treat low BP) (Resident #86). Staff also used improper technique and failed to follow the facility's policy when they instilled eyedrops for two different types of eye medications without pausing in between types of eyedrops, for one resident (Resident #92). The sample was 24. The census was 121. Review of the facility's Physician Orders policy dated 9/22, showed:-Policy: To provide guidance and ensure physician orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with Professional Standards, State & Federal Guidelines.-Responsibility: Licensed Nurses, Nursing Administration, & Director of Nursing;-Physician Orders shall be provided by Licensed Practitioners (Physicians, Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices when staff documented treatments as completed when they had not been administered for one resident (Resident #23). The sample was 24. The census was 121. Review of Resident #23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/30/26, showed:-Cognitively intact;-Diagnoses included dementia, muscle weakness, and quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs and the torso). Review of the resident's physician's order summary (POS), dated April 2026, showed:-An order, dated 1/5/26, for wound to right great toe. Morning shift, cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry and apply dry dressing every 3 days until healed;-An order, dated 2/8/26, to change oxygen tubing weekly on Sunday evening shift;-An order, dated 3/10/26 for oxygen at 3 liters (L) via nasal canula (NC) as needed. Review of the resident's treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) employed at the facility for more than a year received no less than 12 hours of in-service training per year, for two of five sampled employees. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Facility Assessment, dated 1/30/26, showed:-Staff Training/Education and Competencies:-Competencies covered annually:--Activities of daily living (ADLs);--Disaster planning;--Medication administration;--Measurements (vitals, intake, output);--Resident assessment;--Caring for people with dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and cognitive impairments;--Caring for people with mental and psychosocial disorders;--Non-pharmacological management of responsive behaviors;--Caring for residents with trauma/post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD);-The facility assessment did not identify how many training hours were required annually for CNAs. 1. Review of CNA EE's employee record, showed:-Hire date 7/18/17;-On 4/6/26, the first day of survey, CNA EE completed 15.5 hours of training between 4:25 P.M. and 6:20 P.M. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #1's) feet were free from dry skin and failed to ensure skin assessments were accurate. The facility also failed to address the resident's foot care needs on the care plan. The sample was four. The census was 92. Review of the facility's skin integrity policy, dated 7/5/25, showed: -Purpose: To establish best practice guidelines for skin integrity monitoring and maintenance to reduce potential risk of skin breakdown where clinically appropriate; -Policy: Skin evaluations shall be completed upon admission and routinely, as per the care plan, to monitor skin integrity. Skin integrity risk factors will be evaluated upon admission and routinely, as per the care plan. Appropriate interventions will be initiated based on the risk factors identified. Lotion and moisture barrier products shall be available and applied as per the care plan. Minimize, as much as possible, any friction or vigorous rubbing of the skin while providing care. Any skin abnormalities noted shall be communicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of injury of unknown origin to the Department of Health of Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two-hour time frame, when Resident #1 wandered onto another unit, wearing only a brief, with a cord tied around his/her waist and a bloodied face. The sample was two. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention policy revised [DATE], showed: Alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made if the events that caused the allegation result in serious bodily injury. If the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, are reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the allegation is made, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including State Survey Agency). Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-20 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a licensed Administrator, who was legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management and operation of the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The census was 128. The Interim Administrator was notified on [DATE] of the Past Non-Compliance. The Director of Business Operations (DBO) filed and received a Temporary Emergency License (TEL). The deficiency was corrected on [DATE]. Review of Administrator A's State of Missouri Nursing Home Administrator's License showed it was valid through [DATE]. Review of the DBO's cover letter for application of licensure/TEL application, dated [DATE], showed: -DBO had a previous TEL which was granted in [DATE]; -The application was dated [DATE]; -The receipt for Board of Nursing Home Administrators (BNHA) application for licensure was dated [DATE]. Review of an email from the BNHA to the DBO, dated [DATE], showed, Our office is waiting on an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees were screened to determine the presence of a federal indicator (used to identify individuals found to have abused, neglected, or misappropriate resident property) with the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry for three of 10 sampled employees hired since the last survey. The facility hired at least 57 new employees since the last survey. The census was 88. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention policy, approved 6/2022, showed: -Policy Statement: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: The community's goal is to achieve and maintain an abuse free environment. As part of the resident abuse prevention program, the administrator will provide a safe resident environment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide and offer snacks at bed time, when snacks were only offered mid-day, between lunch and dinner, and not at bedtime. The census was 88. During an interview on 6/20/24 at 11:53 A.M., the Dietary Manager said breakfast was served at 7:30 A.M., lunch was served at 12:30 P.M. and dinner was served at 5:30 P.M. During a group interview on 6/24/24 at 1:55 P.M., eight residents, who represented the resident counsel, said the facility did not offer snacks anymore. One resident said they got nothing to eat after 5:00 P.M., his/her sugar was low the other night, and he/she was given some pudding. The facility would give residents a snack if their blood sugar was low. During an interview on 6/25/24 at 3:14 P.M., the Activity Director said they pass snacks at 3:00 P.M., and it's called [NAME]. It was pretty much every day unless they had socials. [NAME] was at 3:00 P.M., and they take the cart around and hand out snacks, drinks and talk to the residents. If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control and prevention practices when staff brought the treatment cart into an isolation room and did not clean and disinfect the cart before taking the cart into another resident's room. In addition, staff failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes, disinfect a clean field, and disinfect scissors for one resident during wound care (Residents #61 and #238). Staff failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), in accordance with the facility's policy, during high-contact activities with residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, precautions for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO, microorganisms that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) or any resident who has a chronic wound and/or indwelling medical device) for three residents (Residents #84, #240 and #73). The sample was 19. The census was 88. Review of the facility's Transmission-Based Precautions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one resident's (Resident #239) physician timely when there was change in the drainage from a surgical wound and when there was a change in the resident's blood pressure. The sample was 19. The census was 88. Review of the facility's Clinical Protocol: Guidelines for Notifying Health Care Providers (Physicians) of Clinical Problems Policy, dated last approved 1/23, showed: -Purpose: These guidelines are to help ensure that 1) medical care problems are communicated to the health care provider, efficient and effective manner and 2) all significant changes in resident status are assessed and documented in the medical record; -Immediate Notification - Immediate implies that notification should occur as soon as possible, the health care provider or alternate is informed at the time of the event. Immediate notification is used when the resident has sign or symptom that is acute or sudden in onset and a marked change in relation to usual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional service standards when staff did not clarify medication orders and documented the same medication as given in multiple forms and duplicated doses, for one resident (Resident #67). In addition, the facility failed to follow physician orders when staff failed to send one resident (Resident #238) out to the hospital timely. The sample was 19. The census was 88. 1. Review of Resident #67's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD, heart burn); -An electronic physician order dated 10/21/22, for pantoprazole (used to treat heartburn) 40 milligram (mg) tablet delayed release, by mouth (PO), twice a day (BID), for GERD; -A paper chart physician order dated 10/27/22, for pantoprazole 40 mg tab, 1 tablet PO, BID, for GERD; -A paper chart medication administration record (MAR) dated 6/13/24, showed discontinue pantoprazole 40 mg tab, see new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a stop date of 14 days or less on an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (a chemical substance that changes brain function and results in an alteration in perception, mood, consciousness, or behavior) for one resident (Resident #76). The sample size was 19. The census was 88. Review of the facility's Psychotropic Drugs policy, dated November 2022, showed: -Psychotropic medications may be considered for residents but only after medical, physical, functional psychological, emotional psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms have been identified and addressed; -Psychotropic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review; -Residents will only receive psychotropic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective; -Psychotropic medications requirements apply to the four drug categories; (antipsychotic, antidepressant, antianxiety and hypnotic)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored appropriately. The facility identified five medication/treatment carts and two medication rooms. Three of the five carts and both medication rooms were checked for medication storage. Issues were found in both medication room medication refrigerators. Staff failed to discard an expired bottle of Pantoprazole suspension (used to treat heartburn) for one resident (Resident #67) and failed to date an opened vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD, used to diagnose silent (latent) tuberculosis (TB) infection) solution. In addition, the staff failed to check the refrigerator temperatures and keep the log sheets updated. The census was 88. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, dated 12/2017, showed: -The nursing associates shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -The community shall not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate and assess one resident after falls and also failed to provide adequate supervision on the facility's memory care unit. Staff did not complete documentation of two falls for one resident (Resident #4) and left unsupervised medications next to one resident (Resident #5) in the dementia/memory care dining room. The sample was five. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Fall policy, revised July, 2023, showed: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for evaluation of a resident in the event a fall occurred and to assist associates in identification of potential causes of the fall; -The [NAME] Fall Risk Assessment form (fall risk evaluation) should be utilized to complete the evaluation of the resident's potential for falls during the admission process; -The [NAME] Fall Risk Assessment form should be completed quarterly, with significant change, and after every fall; -If a resident sustains a fall, or is found on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed administrator was employed at the facility as required by the Missouri Board of Nursing Home Administrators (MBNHA). The census was 70. Review of the MBNHA website, showed the facility had no licensed Administrator after 8/10/23. During an interview on 8/22/23 at 12:13 P.M., the Regional Executive Director (RED) said the facility has not had an Administrator since 8/10/23, when the previous Administrator stepped down. The facility contacted the MBNHA and thought they understood the regulation to say a facility could go up to ten days without an Administrator but they now understand that was incorrect. The RED said the facility cannot operate without an Administrator and the company should have contacted an agency to obtain a temporary Administrator as soon as it was determined the facility did not have an Administrator.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences for one resident (Resident# 1), when two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) physically forced the resident to get into bed against his/her expressed wish to remain in his/her wheelchair and he/she resisted their efforts to lift him/her out of the wheelchair. The census was 70. Review of the facility's undated resident rights protocol, showed that residents of nursing homes have rights guaranteed by the federal Nursing Home Reform Law. The law requires nursing homes to promote and protect the rights of each resident and stresses individual dignity and self-determination. Residents have the right to a dignified existence; to be treated with consideration, respect and dignity, recognizing each resident's individuality. They have the right to exercise their rights without interference, coercion, discrimination or reprisal. Their rights include living in a homelike environment. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medications were behind at least one locked door or cabinet when several vials of insulin medication were found in an unlocked, white miniature refrigerator, in the nurse's work station in 200 hall of the facility. The census was 70. Observation on 8/22/23 between 10:50 A.M. and 12:30 P.M., of the nurse's work station on the 200 hall, inside the small white refrigerator, showed the following: -Four unopened Basaglar KwikPen (disposable, single-patient-use prefilled insulin pen), 100 units/milliliters; -One opened Basaglar KwikPen, with an unknown amount of insulin inside the pen; -One full box of tuberculin purified protein (indicated to aid diagnosis of tuberculosis infection); -One opened box of arfomterol (inhalation medication used to control wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing, and chest tightness). During an interview on 8/22/23 at 12:00 P.M., the Director of Clinical Services said the refrigerator should be locked and she was unaware it was unlocked. During an interview on 8/22/23 at 12:12 P.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-27 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the quality assessment and assurance committee attendees included the Medical Director or Designee. This failure had the potential to affect all 93 residents who currently live in the facility. Review of the document titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated 09/2020, revealed at a minimum the following individuals serve on the committee: Administrator, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, Director of Quality, Infection Preventionist, Two other associates, Others as deemed necessary. During review of the QAPI attendance records 01/2022 through 09/2022 the Medical Director was not listed as attending. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator on 10/27/22 at 12:54 PM, the Administrator stated the nurse managers, the social worker, activities director, therapy director, dietary manager, Executive Director, and Associate Engagement Advisor all attend the monthly QAPI meeting. The Administrator stated the Medical Director does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed notify the physician when physician's orders for medications were not followed for three of 19 sampled residents (Resident (R) 52, 65, and 294) and three supplemental residents (R10, R57, and R240). Routine medications were not administered for R52 and R57. Medications were not administered on the day of admission to the facility per physician's orders for R10, R240, R294, and R65. 1. Review of R294's Profile Face Sheet, provided by the facility, revealed R294 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aftercare following joint replacement surgery, acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure (CHF), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified atrial fibrillation, and presence of automatic cardiac defibrillator. Review of the Physician's Orders for 10/27/22 Signed Only, provided by the facility revealed the following relevant orders were entered into the electronic medical record (EMR) on 10/05/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for the oxygen flow rate (3-4 liters), the nasal cannula oxygen tubing was monitored for occlusions/kinks, and the oxygen humidifier maintained a sufficient water level (empty) and/or provide respiratory treatments for two of two residents (Resident (R) 293 and R10) sampled for oxygen administration in a total sample of 26 residents. The facility's deficient practice increased residents' potential risk for respiratory complications, including respiratory distress. 1. Review of facility provided policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised 10/18, revealed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration, verify physician's order for this procedure, observe the resident periodically, check the tubing connected to the oxygen and the concentrator to assure that it is free of kinks, and to be sure there is water in the humidifying jar and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide routine drugs and biologicals to residents for three of 19 sampled residents (Resident (R) 52, 65, and 294) and three supplemental residents (R10, R57, and R240). Nursing staff routinely entered orders for new admissions to start the following day resulting in evening medications not being administered the night of admission. Additionally, the facility did not have a system in place to identify that medications were unavailable in advance, removing the opportunity to have medications delivered and avoid missed administration. The facility's pharmacy was unable to deliver STAT (immediate) medications. Review of the facility's policy, Pharmacy Services - Role of the Provider Pharmacy, dated 06/2022 in pertinent parts stated, The community shall have a written agreement with a provider pharmacy to provide regular and reliable pharmacy services to residents, including medications. The provider pharmacy shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-27 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and policy review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI- a program that enables the facility to evaluate and improve the quality of resident care and services through data collection, staff input, and systems review) program when deficient practice related to pharmacy services was identified and the facility did not identify appropriate plans to correct the identified practice and monitor for improvement. This deficient practice resulted in an ineffective QAPI program necessary to improve the quality of care provided to its residents and improve facility systems. Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated 09/2022 revealed, this community shall maintain an ongoing, comprehensive, data-driven, community-wide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focuses on the outcomes of quality of care and quality of life goals. The QAPI program has been developed with five strategic elements in mind. 1. The program is ongoing and comprehensive. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-27 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — patternReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and families when three residents (Resident (R) 8, R69, and R241) tested positive for COVID-19 on 10/23/22. Review of a document provided by the facility titled Procedure: COVID-19 Infection and Prevention Guidelines, dated 10/2022, revealed -Notifications of Residents, Resident Representatives, Associates; -Report infections, COVID-19 positive cases by 5 P.M. the next day after a positive confirmation to resident and resident representatives. Review of a document provided by the facility titled Positive Covid Residents, undated, revealed R8, R69, and R241 tested positive for COVID-19 on 10/23/22. Review of the Resident and Family Member Letter: Current Resident and Staff COVID-19 Case Statistics, provided by the facility, dated 10/24/22, revealed the current number of residents who are COVID-19 positive in our community is 0. Review of the Resident and Family Member Letter: Current Resident and Staff COVID-19 Case Statistics, provided by the facility, dated 10/26/22, revealed the current number of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-27 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (Resident (R) 293) had a physician's order and was assessed and care planned for the self-administration of medications prior to self-administration of medication by the resident. Review of facility provided policy titled Self-Administration of Medication, dated 12/21, revealed Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. The nurse will complete the self-administration of medication assessment. If the nurse and physician determines that a resident can safely self-administer an order will be obtained for self-administration of medication. The resident person-centered care plan will be updated to reflect the wishes to self-administer medication. Nursing will monitor the medication administration record (MAR) appropriately noting that the doses were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency for one of five residents (Resident (R) 58) reviewed for abuse. Review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting, policy last revised 07/2022 revealed all reports of resident abuse and/or mistreatment shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by community management. If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse is reported, the Administrator or designee will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual . upon conclusion of the investigation, the investigator will record the results of the investigation on approved documentation forms and provide the completed documentation to the Administrator or designee. All alleged violations involving abuse will be reported to the Administrator or designee and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed in response to allegations of abuse to maintain documented evidence that all violations were thoroughly investigated for one of five residents (Resident (R) 58) reviewed for abuse. Review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting, policy last revised 07/2022, revealed all reports of resident abuse and/or mistreatment shall be thoroughly investigated by community management. If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse is reported, the Administrator or designee will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual. The individual conducting the investigation will, at a minimum interview the person(s) reporting the incident, interview any witnesses to the incident, interview associate members, on all shifts, who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident, and interview the resident's roommate, family members, and visitors. Upon conclusion of the investigation, the investigator will record the results of the investigation on approved documentation forms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure treatments were administered as ordered for one of one resident (Resident (R) 65) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions in the sample of 26 residents and failed to ensure the medical record was updated with skin integrity identification changes or the development and implementation of care plan interventions regarding a catheter leg strap for one of one resident (Resident (R) 291) reviewed for skin integrity in a total sample of 26 residents. 1. A policy for following physician orders was requested and none was provided. Review of R65's undated Profile Face Sheet, provided by the facility, indicated he/she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of left tibia (shin bone) and infection following a surgical procedure. Review of R65's admission Minimal Data Sheet (MDS), provided by the facility, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/25/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 291) reviewed for urinary catheter had a leg strap (stat lock) to reduce friction and movement of R291's indwelling urinary catheter at the insertion site in a total sample of 26 residents. The facility's deficient practice had potential to injure R291's urinary tract system. Review of facility provided policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, dated 01/22, revealed Ensure that the catheter remains secured with a leg strap to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site. (Note: Catheter tubing should be strapped to the resident's inner thigh) Review of [NAME] CARE, a manufacture's brochure titled StatLock Stabilization Device, undated, revealed the StatLock Foley Stabilization Device is a strap free device which secures the Foley catheter in place, stabilizes the catheter and reduces the likelihood of a sudden pull. Review of the Face Sheet, located in the electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure clinical staff had chest tube skills and knowledge to provide chest tube care effectively and safely for one of one resident (Resident (R) 293) reviewed for care of a chest tube in a total sample of 26 residents. The facility deficient practice increased the risk of respiratory complications for R293. Review of the facility assessment with the implementation date of 08/13/21 revealed practices, frequent education, and re-education with all clinical and non-clinical staff. Education is provided in a variety of ways including immediate face to face education when resident needs change. Review of a facility provided document titled PleurX Pleural Catheter Kit, dated 08/15, revealed for Pleural Placement Only Sterile it is vital that caregivers are carefully instructed on how to use the kit to drain the pleural cavity. The person (s) responsible for drainage must be able to demonstrate they are capable of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who use psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions (GDR), if not contraindicated, and/or monitor specific behaviors for three of five residents (Resident (R) 64, R38, and R291) reviewed for unnecessary medications in a total sample of 26 residents. Review of facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication, dated 07/2020, revealed, the health care practitioner and other associates will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior. A resident who used psychotropic medication will receive gradual dose reduction (GDR) and behavioral interventions. The pharmacist will report on the medication regiment review (MRR) and will submit recommendations to the physician and Director of Nursing (DON). The DON will ensure that recommendations are followed through which will not exceed 30 days. 1. During an interview and resident observation on 10/24/22 at 11:22 AM, R64 was pacing back and forth from his/her room to the nurses' station. R64 stated he/she was lost and did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-06-26 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, legal representatives of residents and visitors the results of the most recent survey and complaint investigations. The census was 88. Observations on 6/20/24, 6/21/24 and 6/24/24, showed no survey results maintained at the entrance of the building, in the lobby of the building or at the desk with the receptionist. No signs were posted for the location of the survey results and/or availability of the last survey or complaint investigations. During a group interview on 6/24/24 at 1:55 P.M., eight residents who represented the resident counsel said they did not know where to locate the survey binder. During an observation and interview on 6/24/24 at 3:16 P.M., eight residents from the group meeting approached the receptionist area and requested the survey binder. The binder was not located. The receptionist said he/she was not aware of where the survey binder was located and not sure if he/she ever saw it. The front lobby was under construction and the binder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-10-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was complete and accurate and posted in a prominent place, in a readable format and readily available to residents and visitors. There were 93 residents residing at the facility. Review of facility policy titled Posting Direct Daily Staffing Numbers last revised 07/20 revealed Notification should be made to associates, residents and visitors of the community census, the number of nursing associates by category scheduled for each shift, as well as the number of actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing associates per shift that are responsible for providing direct care to residents. The information recorded on should include, the resident census, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift, RN (Registered Nurse), LPN (License Practical Nurse), LVN (Licensed Vocational Nurse), CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), and category…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$38,520 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $38,520 — penalty dated 2026-04-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1026 ENTERPRISES II, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| MM ACQUISITIONS, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| MO OPCO GROUP, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/03/2024 |
| 10-26 NATIONWIDE TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| BCJ ENTERPRISES, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| BIENSTOCK, FAIGIE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| BIENSTOCK, JUDAH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| JEREMIAS, BARUCH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| WINTER, MENACHEM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| CULP, CHAD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/03/2024 |
| KOYA, PANDURANGA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| 1026 JB-NATION LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| JFB CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| MIDWEST GERIATRIC MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| MO PROPCO GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| PEASE BELL CPAS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| POLARIS HEALTH LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| SHERBROOKE REALTY COMPANY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
| ZIMMET HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/03/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265417. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.