Cleveland Care And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 30.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 61.3 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-04 · tag F0624 — isolated
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 04/03/25, a past non-compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide a safe and orderly discharge for Resident #7. Resident #7 was discharged to a prepaid motel room located away from their community, leaving the resident without identification, financial means, or caregiver support. The facility did not provide the resident with a 30-day notice of intent to discharge, nor notify the Office of the Ombudsman or the State agency (OSDH) of the resident's anticipated discharge as required. Resident #7 was a direct admitted from the Department of Corrections to the facility on [DATE] with Medicaid pending for their pay source status and without state issued identification, birth certificate, or social security card. Resident #7 was discharged from the facility on 02/26/25 to a motel room in Tulsa without financial means, identification, or caregiver/community support. The resident returned from the community based motel to the facility on [DATE]. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered as ordered by the physician for 1 (#44) of 1 resident sampled reviewed for medication administration. The regional director identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A physician order, dated 07/09/24, showed Nystatin Powder was to be applied to folds, abdomen, and neck topically every shift. A significant change assessment, dated 11/17/25, showed Resident #44 had diagnosis which included candidiasis of the skin and nails. The assessment showed Resident #44 had a BIMS of 15 and was cognitively intact for daily decision making.A review of the November 2025 medication administration record for the night shift, showed Resident #44 had not received Nystatin Powder on November 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27 and 28.On 12/08/25 at 10:14 a.m., the ADON stated if the check box on the medication administration record was not checked the task had been completed then they assumed it was not done.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to evaluate a resident for vaping/e-cigarette use safely for 1 (#44) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for safe smoking. The regional director identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 12/02/25 at 2:53 p.m., Resident #44 was observed in bed wearing oxygen with a nasal canula attached to an oxygen concentrator. There were three pink vape-e-cigarettes smoking devices observed on the resident's bedside table. On 12/04/25 at 11:02 a.m., Resident #44 was observed in bed wearing oxygen with a nasal canula attached to an oxygen concentrator. There were three pink vape-e-cigarettes smoking devices observed on the resident's bedside table. A facility policy titled Smoking Protocol, dated 10/25/22, did not show vaping/e-cigarettes was addressed in the policy to prevent accidents and hazards. Resident #44's Smoking Safety Evaluation, dated 11/05/25, showed the resident did not smoke. Resident #44's comprehensive assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the head of bed was elevated for 1 (#5) of 1 resident reviewed for continuous tube feeding. The ADON identified two residents received tube feeding. Findings: On 12/03/25 at 8:43 a.m., Resident #5 was observed to receive continuous tube feeding without the head of their bed elevated. On 12/04/25 at 8:51 a.m., the head of bed for Resident #5 was observed to be flat and without elevation.On 12/04/25 at 12:25 p.m., the head of bed for Resident #5 was observed to be flat and without elevation. On 12/08/25 at 11:00 a.m., the head of bed for Resident #5 was observed to be flat and without elevation.A care plan, dated 08/08/25, showed Resident #5 had diagnoses which included severe protein calorie malnutrition and gastro-esophageal reflux disease.A significant change assessment, dated 11/21/25, showed Resident #5 had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 10.On 12/08/25 at 11:00 a.m., LPN #1 stated they had worked at the facility for one week and had not observed the head of Resident #5's bed to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's nebulizer and oxygen mask were bagged when not in use to prevent cross contamination for 1 (#4) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for infection control practices. The regional director identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 12/03/25 at 2:47 p.m., Resident #4 was not in their room. Resident #4's nasal cannula was observed laying bedside in a recliner loose and not in a bag. Resident #4 nebulizers mask was bedside with a hose attached laying on a cart under the window and not in a bag. Resident #4's physician orders, dated 01/10/25, showed Resident #4 had orders for albuterol sulfate inhalation solution 2.5 milligrams/3 milliliter orally via a nebulizer. Resident #4's physician orders, dated 07/04/25, showed Resident #4 had orders for continuous oxygen at two liters via an oxygen concentrator. The orders showed to store tubing and mask in a dry protective cover when not in use. Resident #4's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an allergy to latex did not receive an indwelling latex urinary catheter for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a latex allergy.The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified one resident with a latex allergy.Findings:An Allergy tab, dated 03/05/25, showed Res #1 had an allergy to latex.A physician order, dated 03/08/25, showed to maintain an indwelling silicone urinary catheter and to change monthly on the 6th of each month.An admission assessment, dated 03/12/25, showed Res #1 had a brief interview for mental status score of 15 and was cognitively intact. The assessment showed Res #1 had an indwelling urinary catheter.A care plan, dated 03/18/25, showed Res #1 was allergic to latex. The care plan showed Res #1 would not receive medications and/or substances known to cause allergic reactions.A treatment administration record, dated 04/06/25, showed Res #1 had a new indwelling urinary catheter placed.A progress note, dated 04/09/25, showed Res #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a resident with a bed wide enough to allow the resident to reposition themselves and side rails/trapeze bar for the resident to use in positioning for 1 (#2) of 3 residents sampled for accommodation of needs. The alphabetical resident roster identified 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/28/25 at 11:45 a.m., Resident #2 was observed in bed with the head of the bed up approximately 45 degrees. The resident was on an air mattress with approximately 4 inches from their hip to the edge of the air mattress on either side. There were no side rails or a trapeze bar present. A facility policy titled Quality of Life - Accommodation of Needs, dated 02/01/16, read in part, Our facility's environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity and well-being .The resident's individual needs and preferences shall be accommodated to the extent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or resident's representative the right to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care for 1 (#5) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for care plan meetings. The DON identified 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan policy, dated 01/23/19, read in part, 3. The Interdisciplinary Team, along with the Resident and/or Resident Representative, will identify resident problems, needs, strengths, life history, preferences, and goals. 6. The Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan can be revised at quarterly intervals in conjunction with the completion of MDS quarterly, significant change and annual assessments per the RAI manual. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and kidney failure. Resident #5's clinical record was reviewed July 2024 through March 2025. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents on antipsychotic medications were assessed for tardive dyskinesia for three (#6, 18, and #19) of five residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified eight residents who were ordered antipsychotic medications. Findings: The Monitoring of Anti-Psychotics policy, dated 2024, read in parts, .Upon initiation of antipsychotic medication therapy [or upon admission for new residents receiving anti-psychotics] and every three months thereafter, the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale [AIMS] or similar test is administered to the resident. The results, and actions taken in response to the results, are recorded in the residents medical record . 1. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included Schizoaffective disorder, Bipolar type. An AIMS assessment, dated 01/09/23, was completed in the electronic clinical record. Review of the clinical record did not reveal any AIMS assessments after 01/09/23. The annual assessment, dated 01/20/24, documented the resident was moderately impaired cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. A total of 30 opportunities were observed with two errors. The total medication error rate was 6.67%. The DON identified 47 residents received medications in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #14 had diagnoses which included rib fractures. The Physician's Orders, dated 02/02/24, documented Calcium 600mg by mouth daily for rib fracture. 2. Resident #32 had diagnoses which included cough and seasonal allergies. The Physician's Orders, dated 04/02/24, documented Geri-Tussin DM 10-100mg/5ml - give 10ml orally every four hours as needed for cough. On 04/03/24 at 8:48 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to administer Calcium 600mg plus vitamin D3 20mcg one tablet by mouth to Resident #14. On 04/03/24 at 3:23 p.m., CMA #2 was observed to administer 5ml of Geri-Tussin DM 10-100mg/5ml to Resident #32. On 04/04/24 at 9:51 a.m., CMA #1 stated they had not noticed the Calcium 600mg they had administered to Resident #14 included 20mcg of vitamin D3 and they should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when opened for three (300/400 hall medication cart, 200 hall treatment cart, and 400 hall treatment cart) of three medication/treatment carts observed. The DON identified five medication/treatment carts in the facility. Findings: 1. On 04/04/24 at 9:10 a.m., the 300/400 medication cart was observed with CMA #1. CMA #1 stated they were to date medications when they were opened. The following medications were observed to be open but not dated: a. Ketorolac eye drops for Resident #12. b. Imodium liquid 1mg/7.5ml house stock. c. Chloraseptic throat lozenges for Resident #22. On 04/04/24 at 9:11 a.m., the 200 hall treatment cart was observed with the ADON. The following medications were observed to be open but not dated: d. Breo Ellipta inhaler and icy hot cream for Resident #18. e. Levalbuterol nebulizer vials and nystatin cream for Resident #32. f. Anora inhaler for Resident #17. g. Spiriva inhaler for Resident #28. On 04/04/24 at 9:19 a.m., the 400 hall treatment cart was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,069 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-03-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $688K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK