Walnut Grove Care & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 61.8 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 02/27/24, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to protect Resident #45 from verbal and psychosocial abuse. On 02/27/25 at 2:06 p.m., Resident #45 reported over the weekend staff blamed them for turning on the call light. Resident #45 stated CNA #1 came to their room to answer the call light and Resident #45 told CNA #1 they needed assistance with incontinent care. Resident #45 stated CNA #1 told them they were assisting another resident and would come back when they could. Resident #45 stated when CNA #1 returned they yelled at them and stated they would be there in a minute and to stay off the light. Resident #45 stated they had not activated the call light again, that CNA #1 had not turned the call light off from the first interaction. Resident #45 stated they were so upset they started crying. Resident #45 stated they called the nurses station and reported the occurrence to the charge nurse/ LPN #4. Resident #45 stated they were so upset they wanted to leave the facility. On 02/27/25 at 2:12 p.m., the administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the low temperature warewasher had the appropriate amount of chemical to sanitize dishes for the facility. The administrator identified 55 residents ate meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 02/24/25 at 11:26 a.m., the CDM was observed using test strips for sanitizer in the low temperature warewasher and the sanitizer was not pumping through to release the chemical into the warewasher. An undated chemical company instruction manual, read in part,Test paper must read at least 50 parts per million. A policy titled Warewasher revised date 12/18/24, read in part, The dish machine, if low temp, shall use a detergent, a rinse drying agent, and a sanitizer .The sanitizing temperature to activate the sanitizer per manufactuers' instructions .Low temperature dish machine log Sanitizer greater than 50 part per million. On 02/24/25 at 11:27 a.m., the CDM stated the sanitizer was reading 25 ppm and it should be at 50 ppm.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had access to their trust account money on nights and weekends for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for access to their trust account money. The BOM identified 12 residents who had money in the trust account. Findings: An undated Policy and Procedure of Resident Trust Fund, read in part, The management of the trust shall be managed by the business office or it's designees and ensure that proper accounting principals are followed .but not to exclude State and Federal regulations. A review of the trust account ledgers for Resident #1 contained no entries of money being withdrawn at night or on the weekends. On 02/24/25 at 12:26 p.m., Resident #1 reported over the weekend they wanted a coke and was told they did not have any money. On 02/27/25 at 10:04 a.m., the BOM stated they worked at the facility Monday through Friday. They stated if residents wanted money they would need to request it from them on Friday and keep it on their person. They stated the facility did not keep petty cash. They stated, I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency for 1 (#45) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 59 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Abuse Prevention Program policy, undated, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to prevent resident abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of resident property .Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect or mistreatment they observe, hear about or suspect to the Administrator .The Administrator is the Abuse Coordinator .IF YOU SUSPECT ABUSE .Notify a Supervisor/Nurse Immediately .Notify the Administrator and Director of Nursing .The Administrator or designee utilizing the state specific Incident Reporting System will immediately notify the Department of Health by the Incident Reporting System .Investigation .All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse occurred, was alleged or suspected .Any incident or allegation involving abuse or mistreatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 (#45) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 59 residents resided in the facility. Findings: There was no documentation that this incident even occurred. There were no progress notes, no staff or resident interviews, no facility-initiated report provided to Oklahoma Department of Health. An undated Abuse Prevention Program policy, undated, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to prevent resident abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of resident property .Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect or mistreatment they observe, hear about or suspect to the Administrator .Any incident or allegation involving abuse or mistreatment will result in an abuse investigation .All personnel must promptly report any incident or suspected incident of abuse, mistreatment or neglect, including injuries of unknown origin. Resident #45 had diagnoses which included cognitive communication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the failed failed to ensure medication carts were secured when not in use for 2 of 7 medication carts observed. The administrator identified 59 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 02/27/25 at 8:33 p.m., medication carts for halls A/B and E/F and on the North side of the nursing station were observed unlocked and unattended with keys in the lock. On 02/27/25 at 8:34 p.m., nursing was staff observed sitting at the nurses station and medication carts A/B and E/F were observed unlocked and unattended. An undated Medication Storage in the Facility policy, read in part,Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked or attended by persons with authorized access. On 02/27/25 at 8:35 p.m., the licensed practical nurse #3 stated medication carts A/B and E/F were supposed to be locked and attended by staff who were assigned to the medication carts. On 02/28/25 at 11:06 a.m., the director of nursing stated it was policy for medication carts A/B and E/F to be attended to and locked at all times.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained and EBP were followed during the administration of medications. The administrator identified seven residents required enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: On 02/25/25 at 8:41 a.m., LPN #3 was observed providing crushed medications through a PEG tube to a resident that required EBP. LPN #3 washed their hands and wore gloves, but did not wear a gown while providing care to the indwelling device. An Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, copyright date 2025, read in part, Many residents in nursing homes are at increased risk of becoming colonized and developing infections with multi-drug resistant organisms .This facility utilizes Enhanced Barrier Precautions .as a strategy to decrease transmission of CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]-targeted and epidemiologically important MDROs when Contact Precautions do not apply .Enhanced Barrier Precautions: An infection control intervention designed to reduce transmissions of multidrug-resistant organisms that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure baths were provided as care planned for one (#2) of four sampled residents reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) assistance. A facility resident report, dated 07/24/24, documented 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility ADL Care Bathing policy, dated 07/21/22, read in part, Nursing staff will assist in bathing Residents to promote cleanliness and dignity. A care plan focus, dated 06/16/24, read in part, BATHING/SHOWERING: Offer Bathing/Showering twice weekly and as necessary. Resident #2's bathing records were reviewed. Documentation stated the resident was offered baths 2 of 14 dates between 06/30/24 and 07/13/24. Of the two days the resident was offered baths, documentation indicated they had a bath on 07/02/24 and refused a bath on 07/11/24. On 07/25/24 at 9:33 a.m., CNA #1 stated they were assigned to work with Resident #2 that day. They stated after a bath was offered, they inform the charge nurse if the resident was given a bath or if they refused. They stated they then put the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly inform visitors and staff of residents who were in isolation on transmission based precautions for three (#13, 19, and #48) of three sampled residents who tested positive for COVID. The IP identified 22 residents who tested positive for COVID. Findings: The Infection Control Manual, dated 5/11/23, read in part, .An isolation notice will be placed in plain view outside the entrance to the isolation/quarantine room . On 10/17/23 at 9:30 a.m., a white cross or plus sign was observed on the doors to Res #13, 19 and #48's rooms. On 10/18/23 at 8:00 a.m., a large letter Q was observed on the doors to Res #13, 19 and #48's rooms. The resident roster documented Res #13, 19 and #48 tested positive for COVID on 10/10/23. On 10/18/23 at 2:00 p.m., the corporate nurse reported the white cross was a plus sign meaning the residents were COVID positive and the letter Q was for quarantine, but acknowledged there would be no way for a visitor to know what the white plus sign or letter Q meant.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess residents for the continued need for indwelling urinary catheters for one (#2 ) of two sampled residents reviewed for an indwelling urinary catheter. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 10/17/23, documented four residents who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings: Res #2's medical record documented diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Res #2 was re-admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE], the re-admission nursing note, dated 09/10/23, documented Res #2 had an indwelling urinary catheter in place upon re-admission. A significant change resident assessment, dated 09/17/23, documented Res #2 had an indwelling urinary catheter in place. On 10/17/23 at 10:45 a.m. and throughout the survey, Res #2 was observed to have an indwelling urinary catheter in place. There was no documentation Res #2 had been assessed for the continued need for their indwelling urinary catheter.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and stored in a sanitary manner. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 10/17/23, documented 57 residents receive their meals from the kitchen. Findings: A Refrigerator Storage policy, dated February 2010, read in part, .label all leftovers with recipe name and date (month, day, year) of storage. Discard refrigerated leftovers after 48 hours . On 10/17/23 at 9:30 a.m., an intial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following was found in the refrigerator: a. Bologna in a ziplock bag dated 09/23. b. An unlabeled zip lock bag of hot dogs. c. Chopped eggs in a ziplock bag dated 9/4. d. [NAME] in a ziplock bag date 9/4. e. An unlabeled zip lock bag of a green herb. f. Cheese in a zip lock bag dated 10/7. g. An unlabeled bag of deli meat that was open and leaking juices onto a tray containing other food items. On 10/17/23 at 10:02 a.m., the dietary manager reported the refrigerator was a mess. The dietary manager reported refrigerator food storage was their responsibility and they hadn't…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$31,460 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $31,460 — penalty dated 2025-02-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK