Fort Gibson Care & Rehab Center
205 East Poplar Street, Fort Gibson, OK 74434 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 66 certified beds · (918) 478-2456 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $53,271 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-15)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.7% | 13.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.7% | 3.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.9% | 3.4% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 4.7% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.8% | 13.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.7% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.4% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.2% | 17.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.3% | 74.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.9% | 27.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.8% | 16.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.12 | 2.31 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.04 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.7%CMS range 27.1–58.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.3–17.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.0%CMS range 4.8–15.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.44 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 55.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to update and implement individualized fall interventions in the care plan for a resident who fell and sustained a head injury for one (#47) of one sampled resident reviewed for falls. The DON identified 17 residents who had fallen in the past three months. Findings: A policy titled FALL MANAGEMENT, read in parts, To provide an environment that remains as free of accident hazards as possible. The Facility will complete a Morse Fall Scale Evaluation on Residents to determine who are at risk for falling and to develop appropriate interventions to provide supervision and assistive devices to prevent to minimize further Falls and/or reduce injuries .Identified risk factors should be addressed in the Resident's Care-Plan to ensure individualized interventions to reduce the risk are implemented .The Care Plan should be reviewed after every fall and updated with a new intervention .Revise/Modify Care Plan/Kardex; Implement Interventions according to Treatment approach to minimize further Falls & reduce injury. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received restorative services to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living for one (#26) of one sampled resident reviewed for activities of daily living. The DON identified nine residents who were currently receiving restorative services. Findings: A document titled Policy and Procedure Range of Motion, read in parts, To exercise the resident's joints and muscles as required and/or clinically indicated .Verify exercise to be completed with physician's orders or treatment plan. Unless otherwise specified, repeat each exercise (3) times. There was no policy regarding restorative services provided. Resident #26 had diagnoses which included muscle weakness, lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and Parkinson's. The care plan, revised 08/07/23, documented the resident had muscle strength/muscle atrophy, weakness, and deconditioning. The care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the ovens were clean; b. foods were labeled and dated in the refrigerator; and c. the ice scoop was maintained in a sanitary manner. The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Ice Machine, read in parts, The ice machine, scoop, and storage container will be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition .The scoop and storage container will be cleaned once per day. A policy titled Refrigeration, read in part, Foods shall be stored in an organized manner and shall be maintained in their original containers unless they are considered a leftover. All leftovers shall be labeled and dated with an expiration date of no more than three (3) days. On 01/12/25 at 11:55 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The ice scoop was observed lying on top of the ice machine uncovered and not in a bag. Three ham sandwiches were in the refrigerator in sandwich bags unlabeled and undated. On 01/12/25 at 12:05 p.m., the ovens were observed to have a thick black…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were utilized during resident care for one (#32) of one sampled resident observed during care. The administrator identified 11 residents that required enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: An Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy, last reviewed on 05/15/24, read in part, enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care provides opportunities for transfer of multidrug resistant organisms to hands or clothing. EBP should be used during these high contact areas: dressing, bathing, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or toileting for people with central lines, urinary catheters, enteral tubes, tracheostomy/ventilator, and wound care for skin openings that require a dressing. On 01/13/25 at 8:02 a.m., Resident #32 had EBP signage on the door. CNA #1 was observed in Resident #32's room assisting with toileting and dressing. CNA #1 was observed wearing gloves and a mask, but no gown. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment for a resident with a decline in ADLs due to an above knee amputation for one (#7) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An annual MDS assessment, dated 04/21/24, documented Res #7 had no functional impairments in range of motion. The MDS documented Res #48 required setup/cleanup assistance with upper body dressing. The MDS documented Res #7 used both a walker and a wheelchair for mobility, and required supervision with walking 10 feet. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/18/24, documented Res #7 had declined in range of motion and had impairments of upper and lower extremities on both sides. The MDS documented Res #7 required supervision with walking 10 feet. A progress note, dated 11/25/24, documented Res #7 was being sent to the hospital due to possible gangrene to their left heel. The facility census report documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a referral was made to the LOCEU for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for PASSARs. The DON identified eight residents with a level II PASSAR. Findings: Resident #3 had diagnoses which included hypertension, dementia, and hallucination. A level I PASSAR, dated 08/30/18, documented the resident did not have a diagnosis of a serious mental illness. A level I PASARR, dated 06/10/19, documented the resident did not have a diagnosis of a serious mental illness. On 01/11/24 the resident received a diagnosis of psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. The annual assessment, dated 08/28/24, documented the resident was not currently considered by the state level II PASSAR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. On 01/14/25 at 12:35 p.m., the ADON reviewed the resident's diagnoses and stated they were not aware of the diagnosis of psychosis for the resident. The ADON stated when the resident received the psychosis diagnosis a referral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was updated for one (#7) of thirteen resident care plans reviewed for accuracy. The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included surgical amputation of left lower leg. The resident's care plan was reviewed and did not document the amputation of the left lower leg. On 01/15/25 at 10:51 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated the care plan should have been updated to include the amputation and any other changes to their abilities that resulted from the amputation. On 01/15/25 at 11:00 a.m., the DON stated the care plan should have been updated.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one (#21) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Medication Administration policy, dated 01/2024, read in part, Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Resident #21 had diagnoses which include hypertension, hypothyroidism, and bipolar disorder. A November 2024 Medication Administration Record was blank on November 28th, 29th, and 30th for Resident #21's order for levothyroxine (thyroid hormone medication) 50 mcg to be given twice daily for hypothyroidism. A December 2024 Medication Administration Record was blank on December 7th, 8th, 11th, and 16th for Resident #21's order for levothyroxine 50 mcg to be given twice daily for hypothyroidism. A January 2025 Medication Administration Record was blank for the 2:00 p.m. dosage of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 45 residents resided at the facility. Findings: On 09/14/23 at 12:21 p.m., an initial tour of the kitchen and food storage areas was conducted. On 09/14/23 at 12:30 p.m., the ice machine in the kitchen was wiped from the ice drop with a clean white paper towel. The paper towel was observed with a black substance on it. At that time the DM observed the black substance. The DM stated the ice machine had been cleaned on 07/18/23. The DM stated the maintenance man and the DM cleaned the ice machine. On 09/14/23 at 12:37 a.m., a hand sanitizer dispenser was observed on the wall inside the kitchen door. The dietitian was observed to use the hand sanitizer when entering the kitchen. On 09/14/23 at 4:45 p.m., CNA #1 was observed to move a stool on wheels, touched their own glasses, then opened and removed the silverware out of the paper holder and handed it to a resident. The CNA was not observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to utilize their antibiotic stewardship policy to monitor antibiotic use for four (#11, 25, 32, and #36) of five residents reviewed for antibiotic use. 1. Res #11's physician order dated 08/18/23, documented the resident was to receive Zithromax 250 mg daily for four days for COVID-19. 2. Res #32's physician order, dated 08/22/23, documented the resident was to receive Zithromax 250 mg daily for four days for COVID-19. 3. Res #36's physician order, dated 04/17/23, documented the resident was to receive Cefdinir 300 mg twice a day for four days. 4. Res #25 had diagnoses which included UTI and ESBL. A physician order, dated 06/15/23, amoxicillin/clavulanate, administer one tablet by mouth two times a day related to urinary tract infections for seven days. A physician order, dated 07/04/23, documented levofloxacin 750 mg, one time a day related to ESBL for 10 days. On 09/18/23 at 4:28 p.m., the IP was interviewed and reported the facility had implemented an antibiotic stewardship program utilizing the McGreer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were encoded and transmitted to CMS in the required time frame for two (#41 and #44) of twenty residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Resident form documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #44's five day Medicare assessment, dated 04/28/23 documented completed. A CMS Submission Report was not located by the facility. An admission assessment, dated 05/04/23, had been completed by the facility according to the EHR. The CMS Submission Report documented multiple warnings including information mismatch and the assessment had been submitted late. The resident's clinical records documented a discharge assessment, dated 06/08/23, documented completed. A CMS Submission Report was not located by the facility. 2. Res #41 had an entry dated 04/06/23, a discharge return not anticipated and a Medicare five day assessment dated [DATE]. CMS Submission Report for the assessments were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for resident to resident interaction related to wandering for one (#11) of 12 sampled resident whose care plans were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and unspecified hallucinations. A care plan, dated 01/01/23, documented the resident was not a risk for wandering. An admission assessment, dated 01/12/23, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition. An assessment for wandering, dated 04/09/23, documented the resident was moderate risk for wandering. An assessment for wandering, dated 07/10/23, documented the resident was moderate risk for wandering. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/15/23, documented the resident wanders daily. An incident report, dated 09/11/23, documented resident to resident altercation after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the supervision and assistance to prevent falls for one (#18) of three sampled residents reviewed for accidents hazards. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, documented 45 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Res #18 had diagnoses which included COPD, dementia, and anxiety disorder. A care plan, dated 11/18/20, documented the resident was a high risk for falls. The care plan document the resident had altered sensory preception secondary to dementia. An incident report, dated 09/18/22, documented an unwitnessed fall for Res # 18. The resident was found on floor in their room on their knees with their hands and head resting in the seat of their wheelchair. The report documented the resident said they were trying to get out of bed and transfer to the wheelchair. The incident report documented there were no injuries. The incident report documented a fall alarm was placed on the bed. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a significant weight loss and residents received interventions to maintain nutritional status within acceptable parameters for one (#32) of two residents sampled for nutritional status. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 45 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #32 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, encephalopathy, dementia, anxiety, and major depression. The weight record, dated 02/13/23, documented a weight of 155 lbs. The weight record, dated 03/6/23, documented a weight of 155 lbs. The weight record, dated 04/04/23, documented a weight of 144 lbs. A dietary note, dated 04/20/23, documented Res #32 had a significant weight loss of 7.1% in the last 30 days. The weight record, dated 05/05/23, documented a weight of 136 lbs. A dietary note, dated 05/31/23, documented Res #32 had a significant weight loss of 5.6% in the last 30 days and the dietician recommendation was to offer ice cream twice a day to the resident. There was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure behaviors and/or side effects were monitored for the use of psychotropic medications for two of (#20 and #25) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 45 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #20 had diagnoses which included insomnia and major depressive disorder recurrent. A physician order, dated 05/08/23, documented Wellbutrin SR (an antidepressant) 450 mg one time a day related to major depressive disorder. A physician order, dated 05/22/23, documented trazodone (an antidepressant) 150 mg at bedtime related to insomnia. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/18/23, documented the resident was intact with cognition and required limited assistance with most ADLs. The assessment documented the resident received antidepressant medication during the look back period. A care plan last revised 08/19/23, documented the resident received antidepressants. The care plan documented the resident had feelings of prolonged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one (#20) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #20 admitted to the facility and had diagnoses which included heart failure, hypothyroidism, and diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 05/07/23, documented Novolog injection solution (insulin Aspart) inject as per sliding scale. A physician order, dated 05/11/23, documented Lantus subcutaneous solution (insulin Glargine) inject 50 units one time a day related to diabetes mellitus. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/18/23, documented the resident was intact with cognition and required limited assistance with most ADLs. The assessment documented the resident had received insulin the seven days prior to the assessment. A care plan, last reviewed 08/19/23, documented the resident had unstable blood glucose levels related to hyperglycemia. The care plan documented to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were obtained per physician order for one (#20) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #20 admitted to the facility and had diagnoses which included heart failure, hypothyroidism, and diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 08/13/23, documented to perform a HgbA1c every three months in February, May, August, and November. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/18/23, documented the resident was intact with cognition and required limited assistance with most ADLs. The assessment documented the resident received insulin seven days during the assessment period. A care plan, last revised 08/19/23, documented the resident has unstable blood glucose levels related to hyperglycemia. The care plan documented to obtain an HgbA1c on admit and every three months. On 09/18/23 at 1:09 p.m., The DON could not provide the August HgbA1c. The DON stated the HgbA1c had been missed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review,and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu and provide pureed foods listed on the menu for the puree diets from the kitchen. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 11 residents resided at the facility who had mechanically altered diets including pureed and all chopped food. Findings: The menu for week three, regular puree meal, documented puree pot roast, puree new potatoes, puree green peas, puree dinner roll, puree bread pudding, margarine, salt/pepper, milk, and water. On 09/19/23 at 11:36 a.m., the bread was not observed to be pureed for the noon meal. On 09/19/23 at 11:54 a.m., a puree meal was observed to be served roast with gravy, potatoes, green peas, and bread pudding were observed to be served. Pureed bread was not served with the puree meal. On 09/19/23 at 3:06 p.m., the DM stated the puree meals should have received what ever was on the menu.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature for the residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #20 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/18/23, documented the resident was intact with cognition and was independent with eating. On 09/14/23 at 1:47 p.m., Res #20 stated the food had gone down hill lately, it was either bland or to salty. Res #20 stated the milk was warm this morning and tasted spoiled they could not drink it. Res #20 stated the drinks were brought out in the warmer with the food. The resident stated they preferred to eat in their room. On 09/19/23 at 10:22 p.m., Res #20 stated they keep sending orange juice with breakfast and they did not like orange juice. The resident stated the drinks are not cold when they get them but the food is cold. Res #20 stated the oatmeal was hard on top by the time it got to them. 2. Res #25's Medicare five day assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a DNR was signed by the appropriate person for two (#7 and #3) of five residents reviewed for advance directives. The administrator identified 23 residents in the facility had a DNR. Findings: 1. Res #7 had diagnoses which included heart failure, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, and dementia. A DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT form, dated [DATE], documented in parts .This document does not authorize anyone to make medical or other health care decisions. You may execute a health care proxy (also known as a health care or medical power of attorney) to do this . A DNR form, dated [DATE], was signed by the individual designated as the POA on the Durable Power of Attorney for Financial Management form. A quarterly resident assessment, dated [DATE], documented the resident was cognitively intact. On [DATE] at 10:29 a.m., Res #7 stated he did not want to be a DNR. He stated he did want CPR in the event he stopped breathing or his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of blood pressure readings below normal limits for one (#5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #5 had diagnoses which included heart failure, COPD, hypotension, and end stage renal disease. A significant change assessment, dated 04/28/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact, and received dialysis. A care plan, reviewed 07/14/22, documented staff were to asses/monitor/document vital signs per protocol and report significant changes in pulse, respirations and blood pressure immediately, and post-dialysis care: monitor B/P, report hypotension or hypertension. A vital sign record on 07/18/22 at 1:46 p.m. documented the resident's B/P was 76/40. A vital sign record on 07/20/22 at 6:14 a.m. documented the resident's B/P was 97/46. A vital sign record on 07/22/22 at 2:48 p.m. documented the resident's B/P was 86/38. On 08/03/22 at 3:08 p.m., LPN #1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-04 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide letters of NOMNC to residents discharged from Medicare covered part A stay with benefit days remaining in the last 6 months. Page three of the entrance conference worksheet documented six residents were discharged from Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the last six months. Findings: Res #35 was admitted to the facility on Part A Medicare stay on 07/01/22 and discharged from the facility to home on [DATE]. The facility provided an ABN notice to the resident but did not provide a NOMNC form. Res #40 was admitted to the facility on Part A Medicare stay on 07/14/22 and discharged from the facility to home on [DATE] with benefit days remaining. The facility provided an ABN notice to the resident but did not provide a NOMNC form. Res #103 was admitted to the facility on Part A Medicare stay on 01/04/22 and discharged from the facility to home on [DATE] with benefit days remaining. The facility provided an ABN notice to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-04 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for four (#5, 20, 44, and #45) of 20 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Resident Assessment Instrument manual, dated October 2019, read in parts, .Coding Instructions for N0350A Enter in Item N0350A, the number of days during the 7-day look-back period (or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days) that insulin injections were received .N0410B, Antianxiety: Record the number of days an anxiolytic medication was received by the resident at any time during the 7-day look-back period (or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days) .N0410D, Hypnotic: Record the number of days a hypnotic medication was received by the resident at any time during the 7-day look-back period (or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days) .N0410E,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-04 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to update the PASRR program level I screening as required, obtain existing Level II evaluation reports, and incorporate the evaluation reports into the residents' care plan for three, (#8, 27, and #44) of three residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to: a. incorporate the evaluation report into the resident's care plan for Res #27. b. obtain an existing PASRR level II evaluation report for Res #8 on admission. c. contact OHCA when Res #44 obtained new psychiatric diagnoses. The administrator reported five residents who resided in the facility have PASRR Level II evaluations. Findings: 1. Res #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A PASRR level I screening, dated 11/12/20, documented Res #44 did not have evidence or a diagnosis of serious mental illness or a recent history of mental illness. On 10/21/21, Res #44 was diagnosed with recurrent major depressive disorder and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop and revise care plans for two, (#3 and #44) of 13 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to: a. update fall care plans for Res #3 and #44. b. develop a care plan regarding psychosis and depression and/or the medication for these diagnoses for Res #44. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #3 had diagnoses which included osteoporosis, idiopathic epilepsy, and Alzheimer's disease. A fall care plan, with an update, dated 01/24/18, documented Res #3 was to have a bed alarm in bed. The care plan documented staff were to check placement and functioning every shift. An initial incident note, dated 12/14/22, documented Res #3 was standing up from the wheelchair and became unsteady and fell to the floor. The STPR was documented as continue all fall interventions in place. A fall care plan update, dated 12/31/21, documented facility staff were in-serviced on fall alarms. A facility incident report, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received monitoring, interventions, and supervision to prevent falls for two, (#3 and #44) of two residents sampled for falls. The administrator reported 15 residents had fallen in the previous six months. Findings. 1. Res #3 had diagnoses which included osteoporosis, idiopathic epilepsy, and Alzheimer's disease. A fall care plan, with an update, dated 01/24/18, documented Res #3 was to have a bed alarm in bed. The care plan documented staff were to check placement and functioning every shift. An initial incident note, dated 12/14/22, documented Res #3 was standing up from the wheelchair and became unsteady and fell to the floor. The STPR was documented as continue all fall interventions in place. A fall care plan update, dated 12/31/21, documented facility staff were in-serviced on fall alarms. A facility incident report, dated 03/26/22, documented Res #3 attempted to transfer herself from her wheelchair to the couch. The incident report documented the alarm sounded but staff could not get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to designate an RN to serve as DON for the previous eight months. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On [DATE] at 3:00 p.m., the facility staffing schedule was reviewed. The DON licensure was documented as LPN. On [DATE] at 3:45 p.m., the administrator confirmed the DON was an LPN. On [DATE] at 4:07 p.m., the administrator stated the facility was granted a 30 day waiver in [DATE] when the former DON stepped down. She stated the waiver had expired.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one (#5) of five residents sampled for medication review. The Resident Census and Condition of Resident's documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #5 had diagnoses which included heart failure, dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, and orthostatic hypotension. A physician order, dated 12/19/2020, documented to administer Midodrine tablet 10 mg one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday related to orthostatic hypotension. Administer prior to dialysis, send another tab with her to dialysis. A significant change assessment, dated 04/28/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact and required dialysis. The MAR for June 2022 documented the resident did not receive Midodrine as ordered on 6/6, 6/10, and 6/30. A physician order, dated 06/30/22, documented to give one tablet of Midodrine 5 mg every day related to dependence on renal dialysis. A care plan, reviewed 07/14/22, documented to administer medications as prescribed and to monitor for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure drug regimen reviews were acted upon for two (#5 and #20) of five residents reviewed for medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A policy effective 2018, titled Drug Regimen Review, documented in part, .9. The resident's physician will be notified of the Pharmacy Recommendations. The facility will allow 10 days for the physician response to the recommendations. Any recommendations not completed within 10 days will be referred to the Medical Director. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included heart failure, dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, COPD, and orthostatic hypotension. A physician order, dated 03/02/21, documented Lexapro tablet 10 mg give one tablet at bedtime related to anxiety disorder. A pharmacy drug regimen review, dated 11/08/21, documented a request to decrease the resident's Lexapro at bedtime from 10 mg to 5 mg. A physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 08/03/22 at 7:30 a.m., CMA #2 was observed administering 20 ml of Lactulose 10 mg/5 ml to Res #25. Order reconciliation documented the resident's dose of Lactulose was to have been 30 ml. On 08/03/22 at 11:30 a.m., LPN #3 was observed during insulin pass. She was observed with a piece of lined paper with resident names on one side and sliding scale parameters on the other. She stated that all residents were on the same sliding scale per the facility physician. She was observed to administer four units of Novolog insulin to Res #15 according to the sliding scale written on the paper. Res #15's orders documented the resident was to receive a scheduled four units of insulin in addition to the sliding scale that was administered. On 08/03/22 at 11:57 a.m., LPN #3 stated Res #15 was supposed to get an additional four units, but he didn't.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to conduct a significant change assessment when the resident had an improvement in condition for one (#44) of 20 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #44 had diagnoses which included heart failure, psychosis, and dementia. A quarterly assessment, dated 04/22/22, documented Res #44 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and hygiene. The assessment documented the resident required limited assistance with walking, locomotion, and eating. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/23/22, documented Res #44 was independent with bed mobility, transfer, walking and eating. The assessment documented the resident required supervision with toileting. On 08/02/22 at 3:22 p.m., Res #44 was observed in her room and appeared calm and talkative and her speech was nonsensical. On 08/04/22 at 11:14 a.m., the DON confirmed Res #44's last quarterly assessment, dated 07/23/22, should have been a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure completed resident assessments were transmitted to CMS within the required time frame for one (#1) of one resident reviewed for MDS assessments greater than 120 days old. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #1 had diagnoses which included coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and Alzheimer's disease. An annual assessment, dated 02/18/22, documented Res #1 was severely impaired in daily decision making and required extensive assistance for most ADLs. On 08/04/22 at 11:14 a.m., the DON stated Res #1 no longer resided in the facility. On 08/04/22 at 11:29 a.m., the DON reported CMS had rejected the batch which contained Res #1's subsequent MDS assessments and they had not been uploaded. He stated the rejection of the MDS assessments must have been missed.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to conduct routine assessments of pressure ulcers for one (#39) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented two residents had pressure ulcers. Findings: Res #39 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region, altered mental status, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side. A physician order, dated 07/13/22, documented to apply barrier cream every shift to sacral/coccyx area three times a day for skin/wound. A weekly skin/wound assessment, dated 07/13/22, documented the resident had a stage II pressure ulcer to the coccyx measuring 0.5 cm x 0.3 cm. A five day assessment, dated 07/20/22, documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognition, required extensive assistance of one staff with bed mobility and personal hygiene, total assistance of two staff with transfers, and total assistance of one staff with toileting. The assessment documented the resident had one stage two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PRN psychotropic medication duration order did not extend beyond 14 days and GDR of psychotropic medications were attempted for one (#20) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #20 had diagnoses which included generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, insomnia, and dementia with behaviors. A physician order, dated 03/14/22, documented trazodone tablet 150 mg, give one tablet by mouth at bedtime related to insomnia. A physician order, dated 03/14/22, documented Geodon capsule 60 mg, give one capsule by mouth two times a day related to major depressive disorder. A physician order, dated 03/23/22, documented lorazepam tablet one mg, give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for agitation. A physician order, dated 03/23/22, documented Ambien tablet 5 mg, give one tablet by mouth at bedtime related to insomnia. A pharmacy drug regimen review, dated 04/08/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free of significant medication errors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 08/03/22 at 11:30 a.m., LPN #3 was observed during insulin pass. She was observed with a piece of lined paper with resident names on one side and sliding scale parameters on the other. She stated all residents were on the same sliding scale per the facility physician. She was observed to administer four units of Novolog insulin to Res #15 according to the sliding scale. Res #15 physician orders documented the resident was to receive a scheduled four units of insulin in addition to the sliding scale that was administered. On 08/03/22, at 11:57 a.m., LPN #3 stated the resident was supposed to get an additional four units. She stated the error occurred partially because she did not have the computer to verify the order and partially because of human error. On 08/03/22 at 12:00 p.m., the DON stated staff were supposed to verify the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$53,271 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $53,271 — penalty dated 2025-01-15
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-11 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OK SNF HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 05/14/2024 |
| OK SNF INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 05/14/2024 |
| JFB OK TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 05/14/2024 |
| SOUTHEAST VENTURES TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 05/14/2024 |
| SMITH, SARA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/14/2024 |
| FRIEDMAN, NAFTALI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/14/2024 |
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $863K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375330. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.