South Pointe Rehabilitation and Care Center
5725 South Ross, Oklahoma City, OK 73119 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 375 certified beds · (405) 685-4791 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $202,060 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-03)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.9% | 13.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.5% | 3.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.1% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.8% | 3.4% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 4.7% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 13.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.2% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.5% | 94.6% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.9% | 17.1% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.2% | 17.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 21.7% | 74.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.0% | 27.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.1% | 16.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.80 | 2.31 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.72 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
33.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 33.5%CMS range 23.3–47.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 8.2–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 55.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 4.7–14.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 375 beds and averages 195.7 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 179 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 02/27/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to protect Resident #12 from mental and physical abuse. On 02/25/25 at 3:02 p.m., Resident #12 was interviewed and stated on 01/23/25 at 6:00 p.m. a person came to door 2 (hall 200) pounding on the door. Resident #12 stated CMA #1 let this person in and they immediately staring cussing and making a move to hit CMA #1. Resident #12 stated they took off down towards them and asked the unknown person what they were doing. Resident #12 stated the person took two swings at them and on the second swing hit them on the face. Resident #12 stated it hurt like the [NAME]. Resident #12 stated ever since then, I don't feel safe. Resident #12 stated, It could happen again. Resident #12 stated they did not know who the person was, but they were delivering medications for a company and the administrator and DON would know who they were. Resident #12 stated the cops were called and charges were pressed. Resident #12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 02/25/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure safety and supervision for Resident #4 who smoked. On 02/24/25 at 5:40 p.m., Resident #7 was observed in the outside courtyard smoking area without staff present. Resident #7 was observed to remove a cigarette, lit it with a match, and began to smoke. Resident #7 stated they had only been at the facility for a week. Resident #7 stated they smoked whenever they wanted to and kept their own cigarettes and matches. A Smoking Policy, dated 11/06/24, read in part, The facility shall maintain safety for residents who request to Smoke, as well as for those who do not. Residents requesting to smoke during their stay may be permitted with staff assistance of handling, igniting, and extinguishing (as needed) of smoker materials and may only smoke in designated areas .For Safety concerns, Residents will be Supervised during Smoking. Resident #4's Smoking Safety Evaluation, dated 01/13/25, read in part,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of neglect for one (#3) of four sampled residents reviewed for neglect. Resident #3 took a water pitcher from the medication cart and proceed down the hall. Resident #2 blocked Resident #3 from leaving down the hall and ended up grabbing Resident #3 on the shoulders and base of the neck forcefully pushing them to the ground. Resident #3 sustained a fractured hip requiring surgery. CNA #1 was present and did not intervene to protect Resident #3 from Resident #2. The DON identifed 13 residents who resided on hall 600 memory care unit. Findings: The Abuse Prevention policy, last revised 10/21/22, read in part, .Neglect: failure of an employee to provide reasonable or necessary services to maintain the physical and mental health of any consumer when that failure presents either imminent danger to the health, safety, or welfare of a consumer or substantial probability that death or serious injury would result. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #11 had diagnoses which included other abnormalities of gait and mobility and unspecified osteoarthritis. Resident #11's care plan, dated 11/20/23, documented resident had a fall with minor injury on 11/20/23 while transferring out of the wheelchair. The intervention documented was to place anti roll back bars to the wheelchair. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 12/20/23, documented Resident #11 required substantial/maximal assistance with sit to stand. On 01/12/24 at 1:50 p.m., LPN #6 stated Resident #11 was to have anti lock on their chair, however there had been a change in Resident #11's chair and Resident #11 was in a borrowed chair at this time. On 1/12/24 at 1:52 p.m. LPN #6 stated the anti lock was not on Resident #11's chair. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed ensure interventions were in place, new intervention were implement after a fall, and staff were aware of fall interventions for two (#156 and #11) of four sampled residents reviewed for accident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were educated and offered the opportunity to create an advance directive for 5 (#46, 55, 77, 94, and #175) of 35 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The DON identified 177 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #46's electronic health records showed no advance directive information had been provided. 2. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #55's electronic health records showed no advance directive information had been provided. 3. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #77's electronic heath record showed no advanced directive information had been provided. 4. Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #99's electronic heath record showed no advanced directive information had been provided. 5. Resident #175 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were coded to reflect the status for 3 (#105, 126, and #175) of 35 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. The DON identified 177 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #105's care plan, dated 4/24/25, showed the resident had diagnoses which included dementia, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. A progress note, dated 04/12/25, showed a nurse confirmed there was a new open wound on Resident #105's left buttock that was not there the week before. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/15/25, showed Resident #105 had no wounds. On 04/28/25 at 1:25 p.m., MDS #2 stated they would expect the MDS to catch the wound and put it somewhere, once staff determined what kind of wound it was. On 04/28/25 at 2:55 p.m., the DON stated it was expected the MDS assessments be accurate. 2. Resident #175's care plan, dated 4/24/25, showed the resident had diagnoses which included severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide in between meal snacks for 1 (Hall 3) of 1 halls reported during resident council meeting. The administrator reported 174 residents were provided meals from the kitchen. Findings: A policy titled Meals and Snacks, dated 11/27/23, read in part, Meal service shall be provided to residents on a regularly scheduled basis according to facility established times. Nutritional Services shall be delivered to the nursing units by nutritional services personal. Nursing shall be responsible for distributing snacks to the residents. On 04/28/25 at 2:37 p.m., it was observed on hallway 3, no snacks were offered or distributed to residents. On 04/28/25 at 2:38 p.m., Resident #24 was visiting on hallway 3 and stated they did not get a 2:00 p.m. snack. On 04/28/25 at 2:46 p.m., Resident #79 stated they did not get a snack. On 04/28/25 at 3:16 p.m., the DON stated the snacks were not getting offered or distributed to the residents.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve the noon day meal in a manner that minimized the risk of infection/cross contamination for 174 or 174 residents who ate meals prepared from the kitchen. The adminstrator identified 174 residents who ate meals from the facility kitchen. On 04/22/25 at 12:15 p.m., cook #1 was observed to plate food from the steam table to be served to residents. With gloved hands, the cook touched the counter, shelving, and utensils other kitchen staff had touched as well. [NAME] #1 was observed to use their gloved hands to hold plated food in position by placing their gloved fingers on the plate and pushing the food together to one side of the plate. The cook then used their gloved hands to place a roll on the residents' plates. On 04/22/25 at 12:25 p.m., the dietary manager stated the kitchen staff were to use serving utensils and tongs to plate food and not their gloved hands.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccines were offered to residents for 3 (#105, 123, and #133) of five sampled residents reviewed for vaccines. The DON identified 177 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The pneumococcal vaccine policy, last reviewed 04/28/22, read in part, The opportunity to receive the Pneumococcal Vaccine will be extended to all Residents. The Facility will provide pertinent information regarding the Risks/Benefits of receiving the Vaccine .Residents will be offered the Pneumococcal Vaccine upon Admission. 1. An admission record, dated 04/24/25, showed Resident #105 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation Resident #105 had been offered a pneumococcal vaccine. 2. An admission record, dated 04/24/25, showed Resident #123 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation Residents #123 had been offered a pneumococcal vaccine. 3. An admission record, dated 04/24/25, showed Resident #133 admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to act upon grievances presented during residents council meetings or provide rationale as to why concerns could not be provided from the facility. The DON identified 177 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility's policy titled Grievance/Missing Property, revised 04/26/23, read in part, Purpose: To provide an opportunity for Residents, Resident Representatives, and/or Families to present concerns or Grievances to the proper authorities at the Facility and to receive responses to the issue(s) raised. On 04/28/25 at 11:37 a.m., resident council minutes were reviewed and no rationale was provided for the past 6 months from the facility staff. On 04/28/25 at 1:11 p.m., the administrator stated no issues or concerns in resident's council meetings had not been addressed in the past 6 month (November 2024, December 2024, January 2025, Feburary 2025, March 2025 and, April 2025.) On 04/28/25 at 1:12 p.m., the administrator stated resident council had requested lawn furniture since November 2024. Resident council had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their personal funds during non banking hours for 2 (#27 and #39) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for personal funds. The BOM identified 103 residents in the facility trust account. Findings: An undated resident trust fund policy and procedure, read in part, The resident or their legal guardian are the only ones who can designate what the monies are spent on and have the right to request their Resident Trust Fund Ledger at anytime .Residents shall be able to make withdrawals from their account at any time. 1. Resident #27's fund management service agreement, dated 03/09/23, read in part, I may make deposits to and withdrawals from my resident fund account at the facility. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 03/12/25, showed Resident #27's cognition was intact (BIMS 15). On 04/22/25 at 11:47 a.m., Resident #27 reported they had not been able to get their own money from their personal funds to give to their family member. They stated they had filed a grievance. 2. Resident #39's fund…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received quarterly statements for 2 (#27 and #39) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for personal funds. The BOM identified 103 residents in the facility trust account. Findings: An undated resident trust fund policy and procedure, read in part, An internal audit of the resident trust will be completed on a quarterly basis by the corporate office. The resident/legal guardian reserves the right to be informed of internal Resident Trust audits and the results of those audits. A resident trust statements signature page, dated 01/01/25 through 03/31/25, showed a blank for the signature for Resident #27 and Resident #39. 1. Resident #27's fund management service agreement, dated 03/09/23, read in part, I will receive a statement of any account I have at least uarterly [sic]. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 03/12/25, showed Resident #27's cognition was intact (BIMS 15). On 04/22/25 at 11:47 a.m., Resident #27 reported they had not been able to get their own money from their personal funds to give to their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform a background check for 1 (contract laborer #1) of 1 contracted employee. The DON identified 176 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The employee file for contracted laborer #1 did not have proof a background check was performed. On 04/25/25 at 9:11 a.m., the HR specialist stated they did not know contract laborer #1 provided services in the facility until recently. The HR specialist stated the contracted laborer never returned the contract agreement they were to sign or provided information for their background check. The HR specialist did not know when the contracted laborer started working in the facility. The HR specialist stated they should know when the contracted laborer started but they did not get out of the office much and there was a general lack of communication among the administrative staff.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 (#79) of 4 sampled residents to the Oklahoma State Department Health for alleged abuse within 2 hours after the allegation was made. The DON identified 177 residents resided in the facilty. Findings: A facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention, dated 10/21/22, read in part, In addition, the facility will follow Section 1150B of the Social Security /Act's time limits for reporting a reasonable suspicion of crime (immediately but no later than 2 hours if abuse or seriously bodily injury . Resident #79's diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, seizures, suicidal ideations, and bipolar disorder. A incident report, dated 04/22/25 at 5:00 a.m., showed Resident complains of being slaps[sic] them on their buttocks every time incontinent care is done by a 10-6 staff member. A transaction report, dated 04/22/25, showed Incident report dated 04/22/25 at 5:00 a.m. for Resident #79 was faxed to the Oklahoma State Department of Health on 04/22/25 at 2:37 p.m. On 04/28/25 at 4:17 p.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered abdominal girth measurement amounts were completed for 1 (#21) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for non pressure skin conditions. The DON identified one residents with orders to measure abdominal girth resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/25/25 at 9:38 a.m., LPN #3 was observed measuring Resident #21's abdominal girth. They placed the measuring tape across the mid section of the abdomen and stated it measured 53 inches. A physician order policy, last reviewed 09/28/22, read in part, Physician Orders that are missing required components, are illegible or unclear must be clarified prior to implementation. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 02/12/25, showed Resident #21's cognition was intact (BIMS 15). A physician order, dated 02/25/25, showed daily girth/abdomen measurement one time a day for increased girth/abdomen. A nurse progress note, dated 03/02/25, showed the resident's girth measurement was 48.2 inches. A nurse progress note, dated 03/16/25, showed the resident's girth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PRN order for an anti-psychotic drug was limited to 14 days for 1 (#92) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 177 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled PSYCHOTROPIC MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES, dated 07/26/23, read in part, PRN medications will be ordered for no longer than 14 days. Resident #92's order summary report, dated 04/2025, showed the resident had diagnoses which included senile degeneration of the brain and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Resident #92's physician's order, dated 02/25/25, showed lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 2 mg/ml, give 0.5 ml by mouth every two hours as needed for agitation and restlessness. The end date for the lorazepam order showed indefinite. The March and April 2025 MAR, showed the resident received the lorazepam 12 times outside of the 14 days. On 04/28/25 at 12:45 p.m., the DON stated the lorazepam was ordered on 02/25/25. They stated the order did not have an end…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were obtained as ordered for: a. 1 (#24) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis; and b. 1 (#92) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 177 residents resided in the facility and three residents received dialysis services. Findings: 1. In the electronic health record, Resident #24's diagnosis sheet, dated 04/24/05, showed diagnoses which included renal dialysis and atrial fibrillation. Resident #24's Physician Order, read in part, revised 02/07/24 A1C Now AND EVERY 3 MONTHS (FEBRUARY, MAY, AUGUST, NOVEMBER). (A lab test that measures the average level of sugar in your blood over the past 2-3 months.) Labs services for Resident #24 was due for the month of Feburary 2025 and was not found. On 04/23/25 at 2:37 p.m., the DON stated the last A1C they had for Resident #24 was November 2024. On 04/24/25 at 11:21 a.m., LPN #4 stated they did not know how Resident #24's labs got missed. On 04/24/25 at 2:27 p.m., the director of nurses stated she did not think they had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. notify the physician of missing labs for 1 (#24) of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. b. develop a lab policy. The DON identified 177 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #24's diagnosis sheet, dated 04/24/25, showed a diagnosis of renal dialysis. Resident #24's Physician Order, read in part, revised 02/07/24 A1C Now AND EVERY 3 MONTHS (FEBRUARY, MAY, AUGUST, NOVEMBER). (A lab test that measures the average level of sugar in your blood over the past 2-3 months.) Labs services for Resident #24 was due for the month of Feburary 2025 and was not found. On 04/23/25 at 2:37 p.m., the DON stated the last A1C they had for Resident #24 was November 2024. On 04/24/25 at 11:21 a.m., LPN #4 stated they did not know how Resident #24's labs got missed. On 04/24/25 at 2:23 p.m., the director of nurses stated we just notified the physician today. On 04/24/25 at 2:27 p.m., the director of nurses stated they did not think they had a policy for laboratory services.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: a. provide an adequate supply of towels for bathing on resident halls or in the laundry room; b. ensure shower beds were clean and in good repair for two of two shower beds; c. ensure a shower hose was not missing in the shower room located next to room [ROOM NUMBER]; and d. ensure broken tiles on the floor and wall of a shower located in the shower room on Hall 300 were repaired. ADON #1 identified 182 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified the facility had two shower beds and seven shower rooms. Findings: 1. On 02/24/25 at 4:29 p.m., a confidential interview was held with a resident. The resident stated, Sometimes we don't have towels. On 02/25/25 at 9:40 a.m., Resident #3 stated, For a few months we don't have towels. On 02/27/25 at 9:12 a.m., CNA #6 stated they were limited on supplies. They stated they run out of towels a lot. CNA #6 opened room [ROOM NUMBER] with a total of 11 towels observed available for use. They stated, This is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure handrails were firmly secure to the wall in 2 (Hall 100 and Hall 200) of 7 shower rooms observed. ADON #1 identified 182 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified seven shower rooms in the facility. Findings: On 02/27/25 at 9:26 a.m., the first shower in shower room on Hall 200 was observed to have loose hand rails underneath both shower heads. Both hand rails wiggled easily and the metal coverings where they meet the wall were loose. CNA #6 stated it scared them to use. CNA #6 stated they reported it to the nurse who put it in the electronic maintenance notification system. They stated the issue was maintenance getting it fixed. The second shower had hand rails that wiggled significantly under each shower head. The metal coverings where the handrails meet the wall were observed loose. There was a third handrail on the back wall of this shower that was observed to be loose from the wall. On 02/27/25 at 10:37 a.m., CNA #8 opened the shower room on Hall 100. The first shower was observed to have a handrail…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the OSDH for 1 (#12) of 3 residents sampled for abuse. ADON #1 identified 182 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 10/21/22, read in part, The facility is committed to protecting the facility from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to our residents . Abuse: Willful infliction of injury .with resulting physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder and chronic embolism and thrombosis of other specified veins. Resident #12's annual assessment, dated 01/23/25, documented Resident #12's cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 15. An Incident Note, dated 01/23/25, showed at around 6:30 p.m., during shift, LPN #2 witnessed a confrontation between the Resident #12 and a med-delivery person while observing from the nursing station. The note showed the resident had seen and heard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was updated for 1 (#12) of 14 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. ADON #1 identified 182 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan policy, dated 01/2019, read in part, Each resident will have a person centered care plan to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder and chronic embolism and thrombosis of other specified veins. Resident #12's annual assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #12's cognition was intact. An Incident Note, dated 01/23/25, showed at around 6:30 p.m., during shift, LPN #2 witnessed a confrontation between the Resident #12 and a med-delivery person while observing from the nursing station. The note showed the resident had seen and heard the med-delivery person verbally abuse a staff member by yelling and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed report an allegation of abuse to OSDH for two (#11 and #12) of seven sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator identified 170 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse Prevention policy, revised 10/21/22, read in part, The Administrator, or designee, shall report any allegations of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property as well as report any reasonable suspicion of crime in accordance with Section 1150B of the Social Security Act to the Department of Health as required. An OSDH Incident Report Form, dated 09/01/24, read in part, On 9.1.24 CNA [name withheld] reported to the DON that [resident name withheld] informed [them] that [they] did not want CNA [name withheld] to care for [them] anymore because [they] were rough with [them] and won't clean inside [their] labia. [resident] stated that the incident happened on 8.31.24. and [they] felt abused by this CNA. The charge nurse completed a head to toe assessment and pain eval, no new issues noted. The investigation included 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. protect resident from abuse for four (#3, 5, 8, and #9 ), and b. conduct a thorough investigation for allegations of abuse for five (#3, 5, 7, 8, and #9) of five sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator identified 170 residents resided in the facilty. Findings: The Abuse Prevention policy, revised 10/21/22, read in part, The facility will initiate at the time of any finding of potential abuse or neglect an investigation to determine cause and effect, and provide protection to any alleged victims to prevent harm during the continuance of the investigation. The policy also read, In addition to reporting to the State Agency, a reasonable suspicion of crime or allegation of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property is to be reported to at least one law enforcement agency. The policy also read, Resident care and treatments shall be monitored by all staff, on an ongoing basis, so that residents are free from abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. The policy also read, Findings will be reviewed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication and treatments were administered as ordered for one (#6) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for medication administration. The Administrator identified 170 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #6 had diagnosis which included DM type two and diabetic wound. A physicians order dated 06/29/24 - 07/18/24, documented wound care to left ankle change once daily and as needed. Scheduled on day shift. The TAR was blank on 07/18/24 day shift. A physicians order dated 06/29/24 - 07/24/24, documented wound care to left heel change once daily and as needed. Scheduled on day shift. The TAR was blank on 07/24/24 day shift. A physicians order dated 07/19/24 - 07/25/24, documented wound care to left ankle once daily. Scheduled on day shift. The TAR was blank on 07/25/24 day shift. There was no other documentation located of the treatments completed for left ankle on 07/18/24 or 07/24/24, and the left heel for 07/25/24. On 10/16/24 at 3:58 p.m., the DON stated if it was not documented then it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents have access to the grievance procedure and failed to post information regarding the name of the grievance official. The DON identified 176 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The GRIEVANCE/MISSING PROPERTY policy, revised 04/26/23, read in part, To provide an opportunity for Residents, Residents Representatives, and/or Families to present concerns or Grievances to the proper authorities at the Facility and receive responses to the issue(s) raised. On 08/12/24 at 10:25 a.m., a tour of the facility was conducted. Ombudsman contact name, resident rights, and the facility's senior management concern procedure poster was observed on a wall near the main dining room entrance. There was no signage to indicate the person to contact to file a grievance or available forms in the resident units. On 08/12/24 at 11:47 a.m., Resident #3 stated they did not know who the grievance official was or where to locate the information to file a grievance. On 08/12/24 at 1:17 p.m., Resident #2 stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed and adequate portion sizes were offered to residents for one of one meal service observed. The DON identified 173 residents received services from the kitchen in the facility. Findings: The NUTRITIONAL SERVICES MENUS policy, revised 03/31/21, read in part, Menus shall be followed which have been reviewed and approved by a Registered Dietitian (RD) in compliance with the Federal and State Regulations and consistent with Standards of Practice on nutritional care. A menu, dated 08/12/24, documented the following for regular/NAS lunch: Meat sauce with spaghetti noodle - 8 oz ladle, Italian vegetable blend - 1/2 cup (4 oz), Garlic bread - one slice. A menu, dated 08/12/24, documented the following for pureed lunch: Meat sauce with spaghetti noodle - #8 scoop spaghetti (4 oz) and #8 scoop meat sauce (4 oz), Italian vegetable blend - #10 scoop, Garlic bread one slice - #20 scoop. On 08/12/24 at 10:53 a.m., the CDM identified the above menu as scheduled to be served for lunch on 08/12/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by immediately reporting abuse for two (#1 and #2) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The DON reported 171 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility Abuse Prevention policy, dated 10/21/22, read The Administrator and Director of Nursing must be promptly notified of suspected abuse or incidents of abuse. A State Incident Investigation Report, dated 05/17/24, documented the DON received a call reporting CNA #2 had been abusive to residents #1 and #2. The reports documented that LPN #1 was made aware of the issue and had not reported it to the DON or facility administration. Res #1 admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia, psychosis, and other specified depressive episodes. Res #2 admitted to the facility with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, insomnia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. On 07/16/24 at 1:00 p.m., the DON reported LPN #1 reported she had handled the allegation herself and did not report it to the DON. The DON reported LPN #1 was terminated for not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for two (#1 and #2) of three residents reviewed for abuse investigations. The DON reported 171 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility policy Abuse Prevention, dated 10/21/22, read in part, . Any allegation of abuses, or neglect, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment shall be thoroughly investigated. A report to the Oklahoma State Department of Health, dated 05/17/24, documented an allegation of abuse from CNA #1 who alleged CNA #2 was abusive to Residents #1 and #2. The report documented CNA #1 had reported the allegation to LPN #1 and nothing had been done. A review of the investigation of the allegation contained interviews with the three staff members involved. On 07/16/24 at 1:00 p.m., the DON reported they had only interviewed the three staff members directly involved. Reported they should have interviewed other staff that worked with the three staff members involved.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ADL care was provided according to the plan of care for three (# 1, 7, #8) of four sampled residents reviewed for ADL care. The Assistant Administrator identified 183 residents resided in the facility. A Turning and Repositioning policy, dated 07/21/22, read in part, .The Facility will aid with Turning & Repositioning residents to prevent skin breakdown. Nursing employees will Turn & Reposition residents as reflected in their plan of care . A Incontinent Care policy, dated 07/21/22, read in part, .The Facility will Provide Incontinent Care as Directed in the Plan of Care . 1. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included need for assistance with personal care. Resident #7 care plan dated 07/11/24 documented the resident had self care performance deficit and required staff participation. Resident #7 ADL documentation of blanks as follows: April 2024: Bed mobility were eight out of 29 opportunities. Personal hygiene were seven out of 19 opportunities. Toilet use there were nine out of 31 opportunities. Bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean and free from debris for one of one ice machine observed in the kitchen. The Assistant Administrator identified 183 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Work History Report documented preventative maintenance to the ice machine and bins and to check filters, clean coils, sanitize interior, delime was due on 03/31/24 and was completed on 03/04/24. It also documented it was due on 02/29/24 and had been done on 03/04/24 as well. On 04/17/24 at 11:26 a.m., the ice machine was observed with the Dietary manager and Maintenance #1. There was black, brown and white slimmy residue and particles present at the right bottom corner of the machine on the other side of the coils above the ice bin. Maintenance #1 touched it with bare fingers and stated it was food. They stated it was to be cleaned every 30-40 days and had just been redone and was due at the end of the month. On 04/18/24 at 3:57 p.m., the Area Director stated that if the water sits too long it can become stagnant,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure SNF ABN and NOMNCs were provided timely for two (#113 and #236) of three sampled residents reviewed for SNF Beneficiary notices. A Beneficiary Notice form, documented 13 residents had been discharged from skilled services in the past six months. Findings: A Skilled Care policy, dated 04/25/19, read in part, .Anticipated last covered therapy day/Medicare end date/Date NOMNC and ABN will be issues .Must Provide[more than]2 Day Notice . A NOMNC, dated 08/26/23, documented Resident #236's last covered day of a Medicare part A stay was 08/26/23. It documented verbal consent had been obtained on 08/26/23. A SNF ABN, dated, 08/26/23, was signed as verbal consent on 08/26/23. A NOMNC, dated 12/04/23, documented Resident #113's last covered day of a Medicare part A stay was 12/04/23. The form was not signed by the resident. An undated SNF ABN notice for Resident #113, was not signed by the resident or dated. On 01/11/24 at 8:34 a.m., the SSD was asked what the policy was for SNF ABNs. They stated they usually do them at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was in place to conduct destruction of medications. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 01/10/24 at 4:00 p.m., a medication room was observed to be unlocked with multiple containers holding various loose medications in them. On 1/10/24 at 4:15 p.m., the DON stated that destruction of medication requires two nurses and they have not had enough staff to conduct destruction of medications.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the census was documented on the daily staffing sheets and it was posted in a prominent place which was readily accessible to residents and visitors. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 01/09/23 at 9:09 a.m., a daily staffing sheet was observed on the nurses' station counter on hall 300. There was no census documented on the daily assignment sheet. LPN #3 was asked how residents in a wheel chair would be able to see the staffing sheet. LPN #3 stated the daily nurse staffing was normally kept on the counter for the staff and if residents had questions the staff would address them. On 01/09/23 at 9:16 a.m., LPN #2 stated they had no idea about 2-10 or 10-6 shift postings and that the other shifts made the assignments. A blank white board was noted by the nurses station. On 01/10/24 at 9:02 a.m., a daily staffing sheet was observed on the nurses station counter of hall 200. LPN #5 stated the census was not on the daily assignment sheets for hall 200, and the charge nurse was responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to a GDR for four (#52, 54, 85, and #162) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Monitoring of Anti-Psychotics policy, dated 2021, read in part, .The continued need for and the effectiveness the antipsychotic medication is reassessed monthly by the responsible physician .Gradual dose reduction is attempted with all residents who receive antipsychotic medications, unless clinically contraindicated. Contraindication to dose reductions must be documented in the resident's medical record by the responsible physician . 1. Resident #52 had diagnoses which included unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, depression, and dementia unspecified severity with mood disturbance. A Medical Director Report, dated 10/19/23, documented a request for Vistaril to be discontinued. There was no documented response from the physician. A Medical Director Report,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. Ensure medications were secured for one of five medication/treatment carts observed for medication storage; b. Have a system in place for an accurate account of discontinued medications awaiting destruction; c. Ensure expired medications were removed from stock; and d. Ensure medication room clean from debris. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified no residents resided on Hall 500. Findings: A Medication storage in the facility policy, dated 2021, read in part, Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly .The medications supply is accessible only to license nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications .Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, one without secure closures are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to the procedures for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient dietary staff to serve the residents in a timely manner for two of two meal services observed. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. She identified two residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: A Mealtimes document, undated, documented breakfast was at 7:30 a.m. and lunch was at 11:30 a.m. A Meal policy, dated 03/31/21, documented meal services were provided to residents on a regular schedule based on facility established times. A Work Schedule, dated 01/08/24, documented one cook and one dietary aide was scheduled to work from 5:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. It documented one cook and two aides were scheduled to come into work at 2:00 p.m. On 01/08/24 at 8:05 a.m., the CDM stated breakfast was served between 7:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. and lunch was served between 12:00 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. On 01/08/24 at 9:37 a.m., Resident #83 stated breakfast was late again this morning. On 01/08/24 at 9:40 a.m., Resident #484 stated they haven't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for one of two meal services observed. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. She identified two residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: A Menu Substitutions Log, dated 01/08/24, documented roasted turkey and mixed vegetables will be served. On 01/08/24 at 11:18 a.m., the CDM stated lunch was turkey, gravy, rice, mixed vegetables or roasted broccoli and cauliflower, and a roll. On 01/08/24 at 2:27 p.m., DA #1 stated they were out of vegetables and turkey. They were observed to put hamburgers, rice and a roll on six meal trays. On 01/10/24 at 1:31 p.m., the CDM stated they followed a weekly menu. They stated they didn't have enough turkey on 01/08/24 and served hamburgers when they ran out.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic diet was served as ordered for two (#130 and #59) of two sampled residents reviewed for diets. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. She identified two residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: 1. Resident #130 had diagnoses which included dysphagia. An Order Summary Report, dated 08/23/22, Resident #130 was to receive a ground meat with honey thicken liquids. On 01/08/24 at 2:36 p.m., Resident #130 was observed to receive their lunch meal. A hamburger was observed on the tray. On 01/08/24 at 2:43 p.m., CMA #1 was observed to bring medication and a cup of regular water to Resident #130. Resident #130 was observed to take their medication and drank the regular water. On 01/08/24 at 2:45 p.m., CMA #1 stated they looked at the meal ticket so they knew what diet the resident was to receive. They stated Resident #130's ticket documented the resident was to receive ground meat and honey thicken liquids. They stated the hamburger was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a timely manner for two of two meal services observed. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. She identified two residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: A Mealtimes document, undated, documented breakfast was at 7:30 a.m. and lunch was at 11:30 a.m. A Meal policy, dated 03/31/21, documented meal services were provided to residents on a regular schedule based on facility established times. On 01/08/24 at 8:05 a.m., the CDM stated breakfast was served between 7:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. and lunch was served between 12:00 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. On 01/08/24 at 9:37 a.m., Resident #83 stated breakfast was late again this morning. On 01/08/24 at 9:40 a.m., Resident #484 stated they haven't received breakfast. On 01/08/24 at 10:01 a.m., Resident #64 and #114 were seated in the hallway. Both residents stated they had not received breakfast. They were observed asking staff if they would be receiving breakfast. On 01/08/24 at 10:31 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were covered for one of two meal services observed. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. She identified two residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: On 01/08/24 at 10:32 a.m., bowls of hot cereal and a bowl of eggs on the hall trays on hall 200 cart was not observed to be covered. On 01/08/24 at 10:35 a.m., CMA #3 was asked if the if the bowls of cereal and eggs were covered. They stated they weren't covered. On 01/10/24 at 1:31 p.m., the CDM stated food was to be covered before it left the kitchen.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff donned PPE while performing COVID-19 testing on residents. The DON identifed 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A COVID-19 Testing policy, dated 09/02/20, documented staff were to maintain proper infection control by wearing full PPE during specimen collection. On 01/08/24 at 10:28 a.m., RN #2 was observed performing COVID-19 testing on residents on hall 200. RN #2 was observed to wear a surgical mask and gloves. They were not observed to have on gown or goggles. On 01/08/24 at 10:59 a.m., RN #2 stated they wore a mask and gloves for testing. They stated more PPE was worn if a resident was symptomatic or they worked on the COVID-19 hall. On 01/17/24 at 2:04 p.m., DON reviewed the policy and stated gown, gloves, N95 mask, and face shield was to be worn when performing COVID-19 testing.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccine was offered to two (#113 and #79) and ensure influenza vaccine was offered to one (#79) of five sampled residents reviewed for vaccines. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Influenza Vaccine policy, dated 04/28/22, documented residents will be offered the influenza vaccine on an annual basis. A Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, dated 04/28/22, documented residents will be offered the pneumococcal vaccine upon admission. There was no documentation Resident #79 had received/refused the influenza or pneumococcal vaccine. There was no documentation Resident #113 had received/refused the pneumococcal vaccine. On 01/17/24 at 1:27 p.m., the Corporate Regional Nurse Consultant stated they would ask the IP if there was a binder with vaccine documentation. No documentation was provided prior to exit.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call devices were in working order for one of six halls sampled for call devices. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled, Resident Call System, dated 10/20/22, read in part, .The facility call system relays calls directly to a centralized work area from the residents bedside, toilet, and bathing area. The call system is accessible to a resident lying on the floor as required by state/federal guidelines .Upon admission nursing will orientate resident to accessing the resident call system .During rounds nursing & IDT team members will ensure resident call system is within reach of the resident .In the even resident call system is down: call bells will be utilized until power is restored .Maintenance Director will complete routine resident call system inspections . On 01/08/24 at 8:09 a.m., an observation was made of the call light cord hanging over the call system box in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a pest free environment. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. She identified two residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: On 01/08/24 at 8:00 a.m., the dish washing area in the kitchen was observed. Two food traps were observed full of left over food. Three live cockroaches were observed climbing on the walls, two live cockroaches were on the floor, and one dead cockroach on the floor under the sink. On 01/08/24 at 8:25 a.m., the CDM stated they have been having pest problems. She stated they tell the administrator when they see them. She stated she thought they sprayed last week. On 01/08/24 at 2:25 p.m., a live cockroach was observed crawling on the floor in the kitchen area where staff were preparing lunch trays. On 01/10/24 at 10:27 a.m., Resident #6 was observed laying in bed sleeping. One large live cockroach was observed on the wall next to Resident #6. On 01/10/24 at 10:29 a.m., Resident #6 was observed awake. They stated they have seen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure call devices were within reach for one (#162) of 40 sampled residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled, Resident Call System, dated 10/20/22, read in part, .During rounds nursing & IDT team members will ensure resident call system is within reach of the resident . Resident #162 had diagnoses which included bipolar disorder and cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of unspecified precerebral artery. An annual MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident #162 was cognitively impaired and required partial/moderate assistance with most of their ADLs. On 01/08/24 at 8:37 a.m., Resident #162's call light was not in reach. The call light was observed on the floor at the foot of the bed. On 01/08/24 at 8:39 a.m., CNA #4 stated the call light was not in reach of Resident #162. On 01/11/24 at 2:45 p.m., the DON stated the facility policy for call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable room temperature and a clean bathroom for two (#114 and #93) of 40 sampled residents. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A facility Test and log air temperatures form, undated, documented, .required to maintain an ambient temperature throughout resident and patient areas in a temperature range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit .consider the effective air temperature and the impact that .air movement in the building may be having on comfort . On 01/09/24 at 8:43 a.m., Resident #114 stated their room was cold and there was not a heater in the room. Resident #114 stated the outside door was opened and closed all of the time, day and night, and it gets very cold. Resident #114's room was located near an outside door with frequent activity of staff going through the door during the interview. An ambient room temperature was obtained. The temperature was 65.5 Fahrenheit. On 01/11/24 at 8:52 a.m., RN #2 was asked if Resident #114 ever complained their room was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy to ensure an injury of unknown origin was investigated and reported the to OSDH for one (#88) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: A facility Abuse Prevention policy, dated 08/30/18, read in parts, .identify events, such as suspicious bruising .All violations .including injuries of unknown source . are reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made . Resident #88 had diagnoses which included confusion, anxiety, depression and a delusional disorder. A Nurse Note, dated 11/8/2023 at 8:13 p.m., read in parts, .CNA on duty informed this nurse this resident has bruises to [the resident's] left hip. immediately head to toe assessment was done. bruises noted. resident was asked what happened resident states 'I don't know . A Skin Integrity care plan, read in parts, .11/8/23--bruise to left hip of unknown cause . A Quarterly Assessment, dated 11/22/23, documented Resident #88 had severe cognitive impairment, hallucinations and delusions, and rejected care four to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change had been completed after a resident had been admitted to hospice for one (#156) of 35 residents reviewed for assessments. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. She identified five residents were on hospice. Findings: Resident #156 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Patient Information Report, dated 11/30/23, documented Resident #156 was admitted to hospice. On 01/08/24 at 8:45 a.m., LPN #1 identified Resident #156 was receiving hospice services. There was no documentation a significant change assessment had been completed for Resident #156. On 01/11/24 at 2:07 p.m., the MDS coordinator #1 stated a significant change assessment was completed within 14 days after a resident was admitted to hospice. They stated they were just notified Resident #156 had been admitted to hospice at the end of November 2023. They stated a significant change had not been completed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an MDS assessment was accurate for one (#156) of 35 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #156 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Fall Investigation, dated 12/25/23, documented Resident #156 was on the floor with a laceration to the center of their forehead. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 01/03/24, documented the resident had two or more non injury falls. It did not document a fall with injury had occurred. On 01/12/24 at 10:08 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated if the resident had a fall since their last assessment, they would enter it on the MDS assessment. The MDS Coordinator #1 was asked to review the quarterly assessment from January 2024. They stated two or more non injury falls had been documented. They stated the injury fall had not been captured on the MDS.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan had been revised for a resident who had been admitted to hospice for one (#156) of 35 residents reviewed for care plans. The DON identified five residents were receiving hospice services and 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #156 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Patient Information Report, dated 11/30/23, documented Resident #156 was admitted to hospice. On 01/08/24 at 8:45 a.m., LPN #1 identified Resident #156 was receiving hospice services. There was no documentation Resident #156's care plan had been updated to address the resident was receiving hospice. On 01/11/24 at 2:07 p.m., the MDS Coordinator #1 stated care plans were updated every day. They stated the care plan was updated when a resident was admitted to hospice. They stated Resident #156's care plan had not been updated to address hospice until today.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed ensure fall interventions were maintained when DME was replaced by hospice for one (#156) of one sampled resident reviewed for hospice. The DON identified five residents were receiving hospice services. Findings: Resident #156 had diagnoses had diagnoses which included dementia, muscle weakness, difficulty with walking, and unsteadiness on feet. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 10/11/23, documented Resident #156 had severely impaired cognition. It documented Resident #156 required substantial/maximal assistance with ADLs and mobility. A Fall Incident Report, dated 07/03/23, documented the resident had a fall. It documented the intervention was to put a concave mattress in place. A Fall Incident Report, dated 10/06/23, documented the resident had a fall. It documented the intervention was to drop the back seat of the wheelchair. A Patient Information Report, dated 11/30/23, documented Resident #156 was admitted to hospice. On 01/08/24 at 8:45 a.m., LPN #1 identified Resident #156 was receiving hospice services. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required peg tube feedings: A. had been administered feedings as ordered by the physician, and B. had their peg tube feeding bag labeled and dated for one (#35) of one sampled resident reviewed for peg tube feeding. The DON identified five residents received peg tube feedings. Findings: Resident #35 had diagnoses which included dysphagia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease and dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. A Physician's order dated 12/02/23, documented Nepro at 60 cc/hr x 18 hours via peg off at 10:00 a.m. and on at 4:00 p.m. On 01/10/24 at 10:00 a.m., peg tube feeding pump observed not running. The tube feeding bag was not labeled or dated. On 01/10/24 at 10:10 a.m., LPN #5 was observed to enter Resident #35's room and set the tube feeding pump for 60 cc/hr and start the pump. On 01/10/24 at 10:12 a.m., LPN #5 stated the bag was to be hung by the night shift. They stated the peg tube feeding bag was not labeled and the bag contained Nepro at 60 cc/hr. On 01/10/24 at 10:19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing communication with the dialysis center and ongoing assessment of a resident before and after dialysis for one (#35) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis services. The DON identified five residents received dialysis. Findings: A facility policy, titled Dialysis Communication Transfer, revised 09/27/23, read in part, .A Dialysis Communication Transfer Form is completed each time a resident receives .outpatient dialysis. This ensures enhanced communication between the two facilities .Procedure .The top section of the Dialysis Communication Transfer Form is completed by the nurse responsible for sending the resident to the dialysis unit/facility .The bottom section of the form is completed by personnel responsible for the resident at the dialysis facility and returned to the nursing home with the resident . Resident #35 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Physician's orders, dated 12/02/23, documented to monitor dialysis site, obtain vital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one (#484) of six sampled residents reviewed for medications. The DON identified 181 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #484 had diagnoses which included opioid dependence. An Order Summary report, dated 01/05/24, documented Resident #484 was to receive Buprenorphine every morning. An MAR, dated January 2024, documented blanks for Buprenorphine from 01/06/24 to 01/08/24. On 01/09/24 at 9:09 a.m., Resident #484 stated they have been without the Buprenorphine for several days. An admission Assessment, dated 01/12/24, documented the resident's cognition was intact. On 01/17/24 at 10:23 a.m., the DON stated when a resident was admitted to the facility with orders for narcotics, the hospital faxed narcotic scripts to the pharmacy. The DON stated blanks on the MAR indicated the staff didn't give the medication or they didn't document. The DON reviewed Resident #484's MAR and stated it looked like Resident #484 didn't receive Buprenorphine for January 6th,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure cooked items were stored,covered and labeled with dates in the walk-in, b. ensure food items were not stored on the floor, c. ensure raw meats were not stored with or above uncooked food items, and d. clean a food processor container and blade using standardized cleaning practices between uses. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 01/14/23, documented 174 residents resided in the facility. The Administrator identified two residents who did not receive nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: A Refrigeration policy, effective 03/31/21, read in parts, .All leftovers shall be labeled and dated with expiration date of no more than three days . Stock labeled with dates when received include month day and year. Raw foods, including raw meats, fish and egg shall be stored on the lower shelves of the refrigeration units. Cooked and ready-to-eat foods shall be stored above raw food and foods that are thawing. Foods, being thawed, other than those in single service containers, must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$202,060 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $72,143 — penalty dated 2025-03-03
- $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-10-17
- $121,093 — penalty dated 2024-01-17
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-10 for 7 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-23 for 75 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOUTH PARK HEALTH CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 01/01/2020 |
| SOUTH POINTE REALTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 01/01/2020 |
| MACB RESOURCES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 01/01/2020 |
| BIEGER, JESSICA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/20/2021 |
| BIENSTOCK, JUDAH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2020 |
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375365. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.