Spring Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center
2915 South Fremont Ave, Springfield, MO 65804 · For profit - Individual · 194 certified beds · (417) 883-4022 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0602, F0604, F0610) — most recent Jan 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.5% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 74.8% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.0% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.6% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.6% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.2% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.4% | 23.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 27.2% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.9% | 26.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.4% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.05 | 2.11 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.57 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.3%CMS range 36.6–63.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.5–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 25.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 61.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.6–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.26 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 194 beds and averages 152.1 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.77 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.01 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2021-05-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from manual restraint for the convenience of staff when two staff members (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) X and Registered Nurse (RN) V) physically restrained one resident (Resident #1) against the resident's wishes and without physician's orders. The facility census was 134. The administrator was notified on 07/16/21, at 8:20 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 07/11/21. The IJ was removed on 07/16/21 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Record review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention, dated 8/30/18, showed the following: -Employees shall be able to provide appropriate interventions to deal with aggressive and/or catastrophic reactions of residents; -Employees shall be able to recognize signs of burnout, frustration and stress that may lead to abuse; -Employees shall be able to identify abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property; -Employees shall report to facility management any suspected or determined resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2021-05-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to start an immediate investigation and take steps to protect all residents when an allegation of a manual restraint, type of abuse, involving two staff (Registered Nurse (RN) V and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) X) and one resident (Resident #1) was reported. The facility census was 134. The administrator was notified on 07/16/21, at 8:20 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 07/11/21. The IJ was removed on 07/16/21 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Record review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention, dated 8/30/18, showed the following: -Employees shall be able to provide appropriate interventions to deal with aggressive and/or catastrophic reactions of residents; -Employees shall be able to recognize signs of burnout, frustration and stress that may lead to abuse; -Employees shall be able to identify abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property; -Employees shall report to facility management any suspected or determined resident abuse, regardless of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice and care plan when staff failed to document full follow-up assessments, including neurological checks, for 72-hours post fall, failed to provide all assessed information to the physician when reporting a change of condition post fall, and failed to transcribe physician orders post fall for one resident (Resident #1) who had multiple falls. The facility census was 157.Review of the facility policy titled Fall Management, dated 02/28/23, showed the following information:-Prior to moving the resident, the charge nurse will evaluate for injury;-Complete neurological evaluation as applicable;-If an injury is suspected, provide emergency first aid;-Notify the physician, resident representative, supervisor, and Director of Nursing (DON);-Document in the resident's medical record, complete an incident report, implement post-fall evaluations, and documentation for 72 hours. Review of the facility policy titled Physician Orders, dated 09/28/22, showed the following information:-Orders must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed implement a complete and effective infection control program when staff failed to properly discard a blood contaminated glucose (sugar) test strip and sharps (any device with points or edges that can puncture or cut skin) in the designated sharps container for one resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 157.Review of the facility policy titled Standard Precautions, dated 10/25/22, showed the following information:-Place sharps in a puncture resistant container;-Follow procedures for disposal of regulated/infectious waste when items are saturated with blood and meet the definition of regulated infectious waste. Review of the SafeNeedleDisposal.org's What To Do with Used Sharps in Missouri, dated 10/23/25, showed the following: -Put sharps in a strong, plastic container;-Sharps should never be thrown loosely into the trash or toilet;-Sharps that retract after use, or are very small, should be disposed of like all other sharps. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention page Regulated Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when facility nursing staff failed to provide appropriate neurological assessments (evaluation of the functioning of the nervous system, identifying any abnormalities or neurological deficits.) for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) after each resident sustained a fall with potential for head injury. The facility census was 156.Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Management, dated 02/08/23, showed the following:-Prior to moving the resident, the charge nurse will evaluate for injury;-Complete neurological evaluation post-fall on resident with potential head injury or unwitnessed fall;-Provide emergency first aide treatment as applicable;-Notify physician, resident representative, supervisor, Director of Nursing (DON), and Administrator when appropriate;-Investigate the circumstances and surrounding where the fall occurred and implement intervention to reduce further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per accepted standards of practice when staff failed to accurately document regarding administration, or lack of administration, of an ordered medication; failed to ensure the medication was available for administration; failed notify the physician of the missed doses in a timely fashion; and failed to care plan the use and/or refusals of the medication for one resident (Resident #1) out of a sample of four residents. The facility census was 156.Review of the facility's Medication Administration-General Guidelines Policy, revised October 2017, showed the following:-Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so;-The facility has sufficient staff and a medication distribution system to ensure safe administration of medications without unnecessary interruptions;-The Medication Administration Record (MAR) is always employed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents with tube feedings received sufficient nutrition when staff failed to understand how to document tube feeding intake, failed to document when tube feedings amounts varied from the ordered amount, and failed to document physician notification when tube feeding amounts varied from the ordered amount for one resident (Resident #2), who was at nutritional risk, out of a sample of four residents. The facility census was 156.Review of the facility's Notification of a Change in Condition Policy, revised 02/06/25, showed the following:-The attending physician/physician extender (nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or clinical nurse specialist) and the resident representative will be notified of a change in a resident's condition, per standards of practice and Federal and/or State Regulations;-The guidelines for notification of physician/resident representative include, but is not limited to significant change in medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all food was protected from possible contamination during storage and preparation when staff failed to ensure the air gap for the ice machine had the required two-inch gap between the drain and the floor, when staff failed to wear a hairnet covering all exposed hair, when staff failed to clean the outside of the appliances, when staff failed to date and label opened food, and when staff failed to keep fans and vents above food items clean. The facility census was 149. Review of the facility's policy titled Nutritional Services Sanitation, dated 03/31/21, showed nutritional services shall ensure a clean and sanitary work environment to promote and protect food safety and to maintain compliance with federal, state and local governing food sanitation and safety.1. Review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed an air gap between the water supply inlet and the flood level rim of the plumbing fixture equipment, or nonfood equipment shall be at least twice the diameter of the water supply inlet and may not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that this practice is clinically appropriate when staff failed to assess for, care plan regarding, and obtain a physician's order for self-administration and bedside storage one medications for three residents (Resident #37, #148, and #31). The facility census was 149. Review of the facility policy titled Bedside Medication Storage, dated December 2017, showed the following information:-Bedside medication storage is permitted for residents who wish to self-administer medications, upon the written order of the prescriber, and once self-administration skills have been assessed and deemed appropriate in the judgment of the facility's interdisciplinary resident assessment team;-A written order for the bedside storage of medication is present in the resident's medical record;-Bedside storage of medications is indicated on the resident Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote and facilitate each resident's right of self-determination when staff failed to provide timely bathing, in the form the resident preferred, for four residents (Resident #20, Resident #37 and Resident #113) out of a sample of nine resident. The facility census was 149. Review of the facility's policy titled, ADL (activities of daily living) Care Bathing, dated 07/21/22, showed the following: -Nursing staff will assist in bathing residents to promote cleanliness and dignity; -The charge nurse will be made aware of residents who refuse bathing. 1. Review of Resident #20’s face sheet showed the following information: -admission date of 06/06/24; -Diagnoses included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (type of stroke when bleeding occurs on the brain), encephalopathy (condition that affects the brain’s function leading to various issues), hemiplegia (paralysis of one or both sides of the body), and depression (persistent feelings of sadness).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment for all residents when staff failed to maintain the cleanliness of the floors, walls, doors, and/or bathrooms for 9 residents (Resident #13, #36, #94, #123, #125, #39, #73, #51, and #141), when staff failed to address odors in the rooms of 5 residents (Resident #13, #123, #125, #141, and #135), when staff failed to a provide a clean over the bed table to one resident (Resident #72), when staff failed to maintain the facility at comfortable temperature in a family dining room and two residents' rooms (Resident #148 and #103), and when staff failed to maintain furniture in good condition in the special care unit. The facility census was 149. 1. Review of Resident #13's face sheet showed an admission date of 06/27/25. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 07/10/25, showed the resident had severely impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident, or resident's representative, received written notice of transfer and/or discharge when the facility failed to have a process in place to routinely provide transfers letters including three sampled residents (Resident #39, #65, and #103) transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 149.Review of the facility policy titled Discharge / Transfer – Involuntary, dated October 2021, showed the following information:- Transfer and discharge included movement of a resident to a bed outside of the facility whether that bed is in the same physical plant or not;- If transferred to another health care facility upon order of the physician, a transfer form is completed, and a copy is sent with the resident. 1. Review of Resident #39's face sheet showed an admission date of 11/21/23. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment completed by facility staff), dated 07/03/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activity programs to meet the needs of all residents when staff failed to provide activities as scheduled on the Special Care Unit (SCU); when staff failed to document routinely offering or completing meaningful activities to with three residents (Resident #13, #17, and #123); and when staff failed to provide preferred independent activities for one resident (Resident #123). The facility census was 149.Review of the facility policy titled Activities, dated 09/14/23, showed the following:-It is the policy of the facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive evaluation, care plan, and preferences. Facility sponsored group, individual, and dependent activities will be designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as well as encourage both independence and interaction within the facility;-Activities may be conducted in several ways including one-on-one programs;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services to meet the needs of each resident when the facility failed to document administration or refusal of medications on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for two residents (Resident #169 and #200) and when staff failed to follow-up with a provider when one resident (Resident #141) went to an outside appointment and received an order for a medication. The facility census was 149. Review of the facility policy titled “ Medication Administration – General Guidelines,” dated December 2017, showed medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so; 1. Review of Resident #169's face sheet showed the following:-admission date of 06/10/25;-Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, cognitive communication deficit, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood) with hyperglycemia (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of medication errors greater than 5% when the staff failed to administer the correct medication dose for two residents (Resident #109 and #97), when staff administered the wrong medication for one resident (Resident #38), and when staff failed to prime insulin pens prior to administration for two residents (Resident #23 and #132). This resulted in 5 medication errors out of 25 observations opportunities resulting in an error rate of 20%. The facility census was 149.1. Review of the facility policy titled “Medication Administration – General Guidelines,” dated December 2017, showed the following:-Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so;-The five rights of medication administration were the right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time. These are applied for each medication being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free of significant medication errors when staff failed to document administration of insulin to two residents (Resident #5 and #65) and when staff failed to prime insulin pens prior to administration for two residents (Resident #23 and #132). The facility census was 149. Review of the facility policy titled “Medication Administration – General Guidelines,” dated December 2017, showed the following:-Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so;-The five rights of medication administration were the right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time. These are applied for each medication being administered. A triple check of these rights is recommended;- The medication administration record (MAR) is always employed during medication administration.-Medications are administered in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in the kitchen in a safe operating condition when three stove knobs were missing. The facility census was 149.Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding upkeep of kitchen appliances.1. Observations on 08/17/25, beginning at 3:46 P.M., and on 08/19/25, at 12:36 P.M., showed the cook stove located in the kitchen had three of the seven burner control knobs missing. During an interview on 08/22/25, at 8:50 A.M., Dietary Aide (DA) L said there are knobs missing. He/she didn't know how long they had been missing. He/she was still able to turn the stove burners on and off. The Dietary Manager was aware of the knobs missing.During an interview on 08/22/25, at 9:05 AM., DA M said stove knobs were missing, but they were still able to use them as far as he/she knew. If they have kitchen issues, they let the DM know and she tells maintenance. During an interview on 08/22/25, at 9:25 A.M., the DM said he/she was aware there were stove knobs missing. The staff were still able to turn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for all residents and staff when the floors and walls in the kitchen were not kept clean and free of debris. The facility census was 149.Review of the facility's policy titled Nutritional Services Sanitation, dated 03/31/21, showed nutritional services shall ensure a clean and sanitary work environment to promote and protect food safety and to maintain compliance with federal, state and local governing food sanitation and safety.1. Observations beginning on 08/17/25, at 3:46 P.M., showed the following:-The floors throughout the kitchen had black and white substances in several areas, especially under the sink areas and dishwasher;-There were pieces of food in and around the sink and dishwasher area;-The baseboards in most areas were black with dirt. Observation on 08/17/25, at 3:46 P.M., and on 08/19/25, at 11:29 A.M., showed the following:-The backsplash above the sink to the left when entering the kitchen had a mold looking substance along the section that met the sink,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective pest control system when multiple flies were located four resident rooms affected five residents (Resident #62, #123, #125, #141 and #147). The facility census was 149.Review showed the facility did not provide a Pest Control Policy. 1. Review of Resident #62's face sheet (admission data) showed an admission date of 02/28/25. Review of the resident's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 07/08/25, showed the resident's cognitive skills intact. Observation and interviews on 08/17/25, at 5:35 P.M., showed the resident in bed. The resident's pillow had a black substance on it. A fly landed on the resident's pillow and the resident waved his/her hand at the fly. The resident said the fly was annoying. Observation on 08/20/25, at 10:07 A.M., showed the resident in bed. A fly flew around the resident and landed on the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated all residents with dignity and respect when they did not provide a name tag for one resident's (Resident #62) door resulting in staff being unsure of the resident's name when addressing the resident and providing cares. The facility census was 149. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, dated 04/26/23, showed the facility shall treat residents with kindness, respect and dignity and ensure resident rights are being followed. The resident/resident representative will be informed of their rights upon admission. 1. Review of Resident #62's face sheet (admission data) showed the following:-admission date of 02/28/25;-Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of upper lobe, right bronchus or lung (lung cancer) and dermatophytosis (infections caused by a group of fungi). Review of the resident's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 07/08/25, showed the resident's cognitive skills intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a process in place that clearly and consistently noted each resident's code status (the level of medical interventions a resident wishes to have if their heart or breathing stops) when two residents (Resident #12 and Resident #18) were not listed on the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR-an emergency procedure that is performed when a person's heartbeat or breathing has stopped) list who had DNR orders/directive in place. The facility census was 149. Review of the facility's policy titled Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR-an emergency procedure that is performed when a person's heartbeat or breathing has stopped)), dated [DATE], showed the following:-It is the policy of the facility to respect the resident's right of self-directed care including the right to issue advance directives on healthcare, to refuse/accept treatment, to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to consistently assess and document complete, thorough, and accurate wound tracking of pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device), failed to obtain treatment orders for an identified pressure ulcer in a timely manner, and failed to document wound treatments per physician orders for one resident (Resident #169) who was admitted from the hospital. The facility's census was 149.Review of the facility policy titled Wound Management, dated 11/15/22, showed the following:-To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, the facility will provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders;-Wound treatment will be provided in accordance with physician's order: cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change;-Charge nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents with urinary catheters (a tube inserted into the bladder, allowing urine to drain freely), received appropriate treatment for the catheter and prevent urinary tract infections per standards of practice when staff failed to document monitoring of urine output, abnormal urine color, and care of the catheter as ordered for one resident (Resident #169) The Facility census was 149. Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care, dated 07/13/22, showed the facility will maintain consistent and adequate hygiene standards for residents with an indwelling catheter to maintain function and prevention of infection or complications. 1. Review of Resident #169's face sheet (admission data) showed the following:-admission date of 06/10/25;-Diagnoses included acute kidney failure.Review of the resident's Nursing admission Evaluation and Baseline Care Plan dated 06/10/25, at 3:43 P.M., showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A/Unit Manager documented the resident was incontinent of the bladder and had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure all residents were offered sufficient meals and fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health when staff failed to ensure all residents received breakfast, including on dialysis (life-sustaining medical treatment that removes waste, excess fluid, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys can no longer perform their filtering function) days when staff failed to provide breakfast tray one day and failed to provide a sack meal prior to dialysis for one resident (Resident #48). The facility census was 149. 1. Review of Resident #48's face sheet showed the following:-admission date of 02/24/25;-Diagnoses included dependence on renal dialysis (life-sustaining medical treatment that removes waste, excess fluid, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys can no longer perform their filtering function), end stage renal disease (final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease where the kidneys have lost their ability to function effectively), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (chronic condition that affects the way the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all residents who required dialysis (a process of cleaning the blood by a special machine necessary when the kidneys are not able to filter the blood) services received care consistent with professional standards when staff failed to document regarding missed dialysis appointments, failed to document resident education regarding missed dialysis appointments, and failed to document physician notification of missed dialysis appointments for one resident (Resident # 10). The facility census was 149.1. Review of Resident #10's face sheet (brief information sheet about the resident) showed the following:-admission date of 06/07/24;-Diagnoses included end stage renal disease and kidney failure.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 05/23/25, showed the resident was cognitively intact.Review of the resident's care plan, updated on 08/18/25, showed the following:-Had a diagnosis of, or potential for,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete medical records for all residents when staff failed to document full details related to one resident (Resident #169) who left against medical advice (AMA) and later returned to the facility. The facility census was 149.Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to documentation. 1. Review of Resident #169's face sheet (admission data) showed the following:-admission date of 06/10/25;-Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, cognitive communication deficit, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood) with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar levels), and pressure ulcer. Review of the resident's baseline care plan, dated 06/10/25, showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A/Unit Manager documented the following:-The resident admitted from the hospital;-The resident communicates easily with staff;-The resident understands the staff;-Initial discharge goals to return to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents with catheters (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the urethra (the tube that carries urine from the bladder to the outside of the body) to drain urine from the bladder) received care per standards of practice and in a manner to prevent possible infections when staff failed to document completion of monitoring of output and signs/symptoms of infection, failed to document catheter changes timely, failed to document catheter care completion, failed to update physician orders appropriately, and failed to update the care plan regarding the care/changes of the catheter for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 157. Review of the facility's inservice titled, Catheter Care/Orders, undated, showed the following: -All foley catheters (a type of catheter) must have an order with size of foley and balloon with orders to change as needed for obstruction with the diagnosis; -There must be an order for catheter care every shift and as needed; -There must be an order to change catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received care per professional standards of practice when staff failed to obtain an ordered urinalysis in a timely fashion for one resident (Resident #1) out of ten sampled residents. The facility census was 152. Review of the facility's policy titled, Laboratory Test, last updated on 04/2023, showed the following: -Staff shall obtain the lab ordered by the physician or physician extender; or labs to be completed routinely per policy, and enter the information on the lab scheduling/tracking form, indicating the resident, room number, month and date lab orders are to be obtained and when results were received; -Any newly ordered lab test needing immediate attention will be added to the lab scheduling/tracking form and the lab will be obtained as ordered; -When the lab has been obtained the Director of Nursing (DON)/designee indicates this on the lab scheduling/tracking form; -Any lab test not obtained as indicated will be rescheduled by the licensed nurse; -Licensed nurse/designee, will review lab test…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported immediately to management and within two hours to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff failed to report an allegation of physical abuse by one resident (Resident #1) to management and DHSS in a timely fashion. The facility census was 159. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention, revised October 2022, showed the following: -The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to: facility staff; -Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress; -Abuse is an employee purposefully beating, striking, wounding, or injuring any consumer; -Abuse is an employee mistreating or maltreating a consumer in a brutal or inhumane manner; -Abuse is an employee handling a consumer with any more force than is reasonable for a consumer's proper control;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to immediately begin an investigation and take steps to protect all residents after all allegations of possible abuse when staff failed to follow their abuse policy by not completing an abuse investigation and taking steps to protect all residents immediately after one resident's (Resident #1) allegation of possible abuse by staff. The facility census was 159. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention, revised October 2022, showed the following: -The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to: facility staff; -Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress; -Abuse is an employee purposefully beating, striking, wounding, or injuring any consumer; -Abuse is an employee mistreating or maltreating a consumer in a brutal or inhumane manner; -Abuse is an employee handling a consumer with any more force than is reasonable for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care for all residents per standards of practice when staff failed to obtain wound orders for all wounds and failed to provided wound care according to physician orders for two residents (Residents #6 and #7) and when staff failed to administer medication and treatments according to physician orders for two residents (Residents #5 and #9) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 160. Review of a facility policy titled Wound Management, reviewed 11/15/22, showed the following information: -The facility will provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders; -Wound treatment will be provided in accordance with physician's order regarding cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change; -Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Review of a facility policy titled Physician Orders, dated 09/2022, showed the following: -Ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when staff failed to document administration of multiple medications for three residents (Residents #8, #9, and #5) of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 160. Review of a facility policy titled Physician Orders, dated 09/2022, showed staff to ensure physician orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with professional standards and state and federal guidelines. Review of a facility policy titled Medication Administration - Preparation and General Guidelines, revised August 2014, showed the following information: -Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices; -Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber; -The individual who administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) directly after the medication is given. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when staff failed to ensure multi-use resident equipment was sanitized between uses, failed to place appropriate barriers for supplies, and failed to perform hand hygiene per standards of practice while checking resident blood sugar levels and administering insulin with four residents (Resident #2, #4, #3, and #1). The facility census was 160. Review of a facility policy titled Hand Hygiene, dated 04/28/22, showed the following: -Hand hygiene should be performed before and after providing care; before and after performing aseptic (to prevent infection) task; contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces; before and after applying and removing gloves or personal protective equipment; and after handling soiled linens or items potentially contaminated with blood, body fluids, or secretions. Review of the facility policy titled Injectable Medication Administration, dated August 2018,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided pressure ulcer care was provided per standards of practice when staff failed to care plan a pressure ulcer and failed to provide wound care to a pressure ulcer according to physician orders for one resident (Resident #10) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 160. Review of a facility policy titled Wound Management, reviewed 11/15/22, showed the following: -The facility will provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders; -Wound treatment will be provided in accordance with physician's orders regarding cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change; -Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). 1. Review of Resident #10's face sheet (gives basic profile information) showed the following information: -admission date of 11/22/24; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, throat cancer, bladder infection, spinal disc degeneration and stenosis (narrowing of the spine which causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all medications per standards of practice when staff left medication at bedside for one resident (Resident #7) and when staff left medication carts unlocked and unattended with medications accessible to unauthorized staff and residents. The facility census was 160. Review of a facility policy entitled Medication Administration - Preparation and General Guidelines, revised August 2014, showed the following information: -When administering as needed medications (PRN) medications at times other than the medication pass, the dose may be prepared in the medication cart storage area and taken to the resident's bedside, leaving the cart locked and secured; -During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. No medications are kept on top of the cart. The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications, and all outward sides must be inaccessible to residents or others passing by; -The resident is always…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient housekeeping and maintenance services in order to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment in resident access areas when floors, shower rooms, bathrooms, and walls were found dirty and/or with odor. The facility census was 143. Review showed the facility did not provide a written policy specific to maintaining the facility's cleanliness. 1. Observation on 04/09/24, at 10:15 A.M., of the 200 hall shower room showed a disorganized array of used towels and plastic gloves. A bucket along the wall contained a rusty, dirty substance. The shower room floor was soiled with an unknown substance. 2. Observation on 04/09/24, at 11:10 A.M., of the 600 hall shower room showed the spa tub was dirty inside. The surface contained discolored water residue/stains and bits of paper. The top edge of the tub had a smear of dried substance with the appearance of feces. On the floor around the tub were used plastic gloves and paper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegation of possible abuse were reportedly immediately to the Administrator and within two hours to the State Survey Agency (SSA - Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS)) when staff did not report an allegation of possible abuse received from one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 147. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention, last reviewed 10/21/22, showed the following information: -Alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury; -If the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, they are reported immediately, but no later than 24 hours after the allegation is made, to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials (including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a timely investigation of an allegation of sexual abuse and failed to immediately take steps to protect all residents when staff documented an allegation of sexual abuse and failed to report the allegation of abuse and initiate an investigation. The facility census was 147. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention, last reviewed 10/21/22, showed the following information: -The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to the residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual; -The facility will initiate at the time of any finding of potential abuse or neglect an investigation to determine cause and effect, and provide protection to any alleged victims to prevent harm during the continuance of the investigation; -Suspected or substantiated cases of resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served per professional standard when the kitchen walls, floors, and appliances were not clean and in good repair; when proper handwashing was not utilized; and when food was not properly stored. This had the potential to affect 153 of 154 residents who received meals prepared in the kitchen. Review of the facility's policy titled Nutritional Services Sanitation, dated 11/27/23, showed the following: -Nutritional Services shall ensure a clean and sanitary work environment to promote and protect food safety and to maintain compliance with Federal, State, and Local regulations governing food sanitation and safety; -Cleaning assignments shall include equipment, cabinets, storage areas, walls, food service-related carts, and refrigeration units. Frequency of completion shall be in conjunction with food safety regulation and with consideration of manufacturer guidelines; -Cleaning of equipment condensers, lights, vents/fans, ceiling, ice machine, etc. shall be completed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it provided full visual privacy to all residents when five resident rooms (rooms 404, 407, 409, 411, and 413) did not have sufficient privacy curtains to provide each resident full privacy in the semi-private rooms. 1. Observation on 12/19/23, at 2:30 P.M., of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] showed the door was open and two beds were occupied by two residents with one privacy curtain track. The track went to the footboard of each bed but did not go around the bed for full visual privacy. Observation from the hallway showed one could see both residents even if the curtain was pulled. Observation on 12/19/23, at 2:40 P.M., of resident rooms 407, 409, 411, and 413, showed two occupied beds in each room, with two tracks each around each bed, but only one curtain. Neither residents could have full visual privacy at the same time. During interviews on 12/19/23, at 2:30 P.M. and 2:40 P.M., the Housekeeping Supervisor (HKPS) said there was a lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they provided a homelike environment and made needed repairs in six resident rooms (Rooms 104, 105, 106, 113, 404, and 407) and the facility failed to ensure the dining room on the 400 Hall was clean and in good repair. 1. Observations during a tour of the facility on 12/19/23, at 2:17 P.M., showed the following: -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was had a metal pole behind the head of the resident bed without an attached trapeze bar; -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s call light switch was without a protective cover; -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], bed B, overbed table was missing the laminated cover around the edge exposing the splintered wood edging; -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom floor had a tile that was loose and the corner was folded back. The base of the wall in the bathroom had a large gaping hole. The closet door for bed A had a large hole at the bottom exposing the plastic framework inside. Observations and interview on 12/21/23, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment as free of accident hazards as possible when staff failed to accurately complete initial and quarterly smoking risk assessments and failed to care plan related to smoking for five (Resident #5, #35, #136, #116, and #129) reviewed out of 28 residents the facility identified as smokers. Review of facility policy titled Smoking Protocol, reviewed date 10/25/22, showed the following: -Safety concerns, residents may be supervised during smoking based on their smoking evaluation; -Smoking safety screens will be completed upon admission, readmission, quarterly, annually, after significant change, or as needed. 1. Review of Resident #5's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed an admission date of 11/09/23. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) assessment, under the MDS tab of the EMR, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of six medication/treatment carts on the 400 Hall (dementia hall) were secure when staff were not present. The facility also failed to ensure that expired medications were removed from one medication cart on the 300 Hall. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration - General Guidelines, reviewed December 2017, showed the following: -During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of the sight of the medication nurse or aide; -No medications are kept on top of the cart; -The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications, and all outward sides must be inaccessible to residents or others passing by. 1. Observation on 12/20/23, at 6:44 A.M., on the 400 Hall dementia care unit, showed the office door was open. There were three cognitively impaired residents sitting in chairs by the office. Both the medication and treatment carts were unlocked. There was no staff in the office. During an interview on 12/20/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor food preferences and/or provide options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat the food served for three residents (Resident #21, #43, and #63) of 11 residents reviewed for food preferences. Review of the facility's policy titled Menu Alternates & Substitutions, dated 11/27/23, showed the following: -Alternates shall be available for all meals for residents who dislike the menu item; -In cases when the menu item as well as the alternate is refused, staff shall investigate a reasonable solution within product availability. 1. Review of the Resident Council Minutes, dated 07/23 through 11/23, showed the following: -A comment, dated 08/17/23, to read resident dietary cards better; -A comment, dated 09/21/23, of still need to be reading dietary cards. 2. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records for all residents when staff failed to document regarding administration of medications for three residents (Resident #24, #39, and #63) out of a selected sample of 38 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration - General Guidelines, reviewed December 2017, showed the following: -Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so; -Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. 1. Review of Resident #24's admission Record, located in the resident's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) under the Profile tab, showed the following: -admission date of 08/23/23; -Diagnoses of included diabetes mellitus type II (body cannot regulate blood sugar on it's own) and hypothyroidism (thyroid does not work effectively). Review of the resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards were maintained during intravenous (IV- existing or taking place within, or administered into, a vein or veins) medication administration for one resident (Resident #307), of one sampled resident, who received IV antibiotic medications. The facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) removal containers were near the door for for one resident (Resident #51) on COVID-19 isolation. The facility failed to ensure glucometers were sanitized per the manufacturer's guidelines in between the use for three residents (Resident #52, #76, and #97). These failures placed the residents at risk for cross contamination from infectious agents. 1. Review of Resident #307's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date of 12/15/23; -Diagnoses included a colostomy (surgery to create an opening that creates a passage from the large intestine to the outside of the body) malfunction with subsequent sepsis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep a wheelchair readily accessible for one resident (Resident #37), of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs, who did not have a record of documented offers or refusals to get out of bed. A total sample of 38 residents was reviewed. 1. Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 09/27/23, located in the MDS tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date of 08/12/21; -Cognition was severely impaired; -Dependent on a help to transfer from bed to chair; -Diagnoses included stroke (when a blood vessel that carries oxygen and nutrients to the brain is either blocked by a clot or bursts), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) or hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body) following other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Review of the resident's Care Plan, located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab, revised 12/03/21,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician, and document notification of the resident's physician notification in the medical record, of elevated blood sugar levels for one resident (Resident #51), of one resident reviewed for change of condition, in the sample of 38 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled, Notification of a Change in Condition, dated 04/26/23, showed the following: -The attending physician/physician extender (nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or clinical nurse specialist) and the resident representative will be notified of a change in a resident's condition, per standards of practice and federal guideline for Notification of Physician/Resident Representative (not all inclusive); -Changes that required notification included glucometer (blood sugar reading) below 70 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) or above 200 mg/dL unless specific parameters were given by the physician for reporting; -Staff to document in the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) notes resident change in condition and physician/physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 assessment was submitted after a new mental illness diagnosis for one resident (Resident #68) out of eight residents reviewed for PASARR. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to the PASARR process. 1. Review of Resident #68's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date of 05/14/21; -Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), encephalopathy (a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction), cognitive communication deficit, and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of the resident's initial PASARR located under the Resident Documents tab in the EMR, dated 07/16/21, showed no indication of a mental illness diagnosis at that time. There were no other PASARRs completed since 07/16/21. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two residents (Residents #39 and #63) that address all pertinent health concerns. A sample of 38 residents was reviewed. Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, review date of 10/23/19, showed the following: -Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care; -The Interdisciplinary Team, along with the resident and/or resident representative, will identify resident problems, needs, strengths, life history, preferences, and goals; -For each problem, need, or strength a resident-centered measurable goal is developed. 1. Review of Resident #39's admission Record, located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, showed the following: -admission date of 03/16/23; -Diagnoses included chronic PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder - makes a person feel stressed and afraid after the danger…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide bathing/showers for two residents (Residents #119 and #308) of 14 sampled residents in a total sample of 38, who were dependent or required extensive assistance from staff to complete their activities of daily living (ADLs.) This failure placed the residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and unmet care needs. Review shoed the facility did not provide a policy related to dependent residents who required assistance with ADLs. 1. Review of Resident #119's admission Record. located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed an admission date of 11/03/23. Review of the residents' admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) assessment located in the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/09/23, showed the following: -Moderately impaired in cognition; -Dependent on staff to provide bathing/showering. Review of the the residents care plan, dated 11/16/23, located in the Care Plan tab of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to ensure acceptable parameters of nutrition were maintained for all residents when staff failed to monitor daily weights as ordered for two residents (Resident #119 and #308) and when staff failed to care plan the nutritional needs of one resident (Resident #119). Six sampled residents were reviewed for nutrition. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding weight management and nutrition. 1. Review of Resident #119's admission Record, located in the Profile page of the electronic medical record (EMR) showed the following: -admission date of 11/03/23; -Diagnoses included of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and was dependent on hemodialysis (a machine filters wastes, salts and fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately). Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) care and services to meet the needs of one resident (Resident #119) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to initiate a dialysis communication form, to indicated the resident's current weight, any medications administered, and any complication related to the dialysis access catheter, prior to dialysis treatments three times weekly, since admission to the facility. This had the potential to place the resident at risk for complications that might otherwise have gone unnoticed. Review of the facility's Dialysis Contract, dated 01/04/23, showed the following: -It is essential that communications process be established between the SNF (skilled nursing facility) and the clinic; -The care of the patient receiving services must reflect ongoing communication, coordination, and collaboration between the SNF and clinic staff including timely medication administration by the SNF…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the trauma and triggers for one resident(Resident #39) with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - makes a person feel stressed and afraid after the danger is over) from a total of 38 sampled residents. This failure has the potential for staff being unable to identify when the resident is experiencing a PTSD episode. 1. Review of Resident #39's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR), under the Profile tab, showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included PTSD. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/23/23, located in the EMR under the MDS tab, showed the following: -Resident had moderate cognition impairment; -Diagnoses included PTSD. Review of the resident's Psychotherapy Progress Notes, dated 12/10/18, located in the EMR under the Miscellaneous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below five percent (%) when staff made five medication errors out of 27 opportunities, involving two residents (Residents #15 and #105), resulting in an error rate of 18.5% Review of facility policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines, review date of December 2017, showed the following: -Prior to administration of any medication, the medication and dosage schedule on the resident's medication administration record are compared with medication label; -Medications are administered within 60 minutes of schedule by the facility, except before, with, or after meals orders. 1. Review of Resident #15's 'Medication Administration Record (MAR), located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Reports'' tab, showed the following: -An active order for liquid protein (supplement) 60 cc (cubic centimeters) mixed with four ounces of juice or water; -Timoptic (used to treat glaucoma) 5% eye drops one drop to right eye; -Ipratropium bromide nasal solution 0.03% two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) with a gastrostomy tube feeding (a tube involving or passing through the intestine, either naturally via the mouth and esophagus (part of the canal that connects the throat to the stomach) or through an artificial opening), received adequate nutrition when staff failed to document that they administered the ordered volume (amount) of tube feeding on multiple shifts; failed to document they administered water flushes as ordered; and failed to transcribe an order for tube feeding correctly. The facility census was 154. Review of the facility policy Tube Feedings, undated, showed the following: -Gastric enteral tube feeding involves delivery of a liquid feeding formula directly to the stomach via an enteral tube (a tube involving or passing through the intestine, either naturally via the mouth and esophagus (part of the canal that connects the throat to the stomach), or through an artificial opening). It's typically indicated for patients who can't eat normally because of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records for all residents when staff failed to document regarding administration of medications for one resident (Resident #3) out of a selected sample of 10 residents. Facility census was 154. Review of the facility's policy, undated, titled Medication Administration-Preparation and General Guidelines, Charting and Documentation, revised August 2014, showed the following: -Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber; -The medication administration record (MAR) is always employed during medication administration; -The individual who administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's MAR directly after the medication is given; -At the end of each medication pass, the person administering the medications reviews the MAR to ensure necessary doses were administered and documented. 1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet (basic information sheet) showed the following: -admission date of 11/09/23; -Diagnoses included wedge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the steam table wells and frying pans were free of a buildup and food debris and failed to ensure all opened or leftover food was dated. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 127. 1. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Refrigeration, dated 3/31/21, showed the following: -Foods shall be stored in an organized manner and shall be maintained in their original containers unless they are considered a left over. All leftovers shall be labeled and dated with expiration date no more than three days later. Record review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed the following: -Refrigerated, ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food, prepared and packaged by a food processing plant shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a food establishment. Observations on 5/10/21, at 9:29 A.M., of the walk- in refrigerator in the kitchen showed the following: -A plastic container that contained what appeared to be spaghetti sauce in the walk in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure all floors, walls, and nightlight grates were maintained and in good repair; failed to ensure all resident's bathrooms had a night light; failed to ensure all closets had doors; and failed to ensure all hoses, which extended beyond the flood plain, had a backflow preventer. The facility had a census of 127. 1. Observation on 5/11/21, starting at 11:30 A.M., showed the following: -No backflow preventer on the 100 hall shower room hose; -No backflow preventer on the 200 hall shower room hose; -No backflow preventer on the 400 hall shower room hose; -No backflow preventer in the storage room hose next to room [ROOM NUMBER]; -No backflow preventer on the shower hose in the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER]; -No backflow preventer on the 500 hall shower room hose; -No backflow preventer on the 600 hall shower room hose; -No closet doors on the closet in room [ROOM NUMBER]; -A 2 by 6 inch area of scraped drywall in the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER];…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-17 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust accounts were reconciled for an accurate accounting of all monies held in the accounts for the 12 month period of May 2020 through April 2021. The facility managed funds for 84 residents. The facility census was 127. Record review of the (undated) facility policy, Business Office - Resident Trust Fund Policy and Procedure, showed the following information: -For the benefits of its residents, the facility shall provide a resident trust cash box and a separate bonded interest-bearing account for all residents who choose to have their personal money safeguarded and managed by the facility; -The facility will have, at all times, a current copy of the surety bond, per state regulations, to cover resident trust funds; -The resident trust account is to be reconciled monthly and balanced to the bank statement; -The resident petty cash on hand is to be counted monthly and anytime the cashbox is replenished; -The count is to be completed by someone not affiliated with the day-to-day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and update the comprehensive care plans for one resident (Resident #95) and failed to invite the resident, or the resident's family representative, to the care plan meeting for three residents (Resident #34, #93, and #94). The facility census was 127. 1. Record review of the facility's policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Plan Meeting, dated 1/23/19, showed the following: -The social service staff will notify the resident, and if applicable the resident's representative, prior to each meeting; -If the resident and/or representative is unable to attend, the care plan will be reviewed with the resident/representative and their response will be documented; -If the resident/representative does not attend or participate with the care plan development, documentation should be noted in the resident's medical record, including the steps takes to include the resident/representative; -Attendance will be documented on the Care Plan Conference Sheet. 2. Record review of Resident #34's face sheet showed the following: -admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to utilize acceptable infection control practices while performing pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) care for three residents (Resident #8, # 88, and #173); failed to follow or obtain physicians' orders in a timely manner to promote pressure ulcer healing for two residents (Resident #8 and #173); failed to document timely and complete tracking and assessments of wounds for one resident (Resident #8); and failed to update care plans to reflect current wounds and interventions for one resident (Resident #8). The facility census was 127. Record review of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Clinical Practice Guidelines, Number 15, Treatment of Pressure Ulcers, showed the following: -Assess the pressure ulcer initially for location, stage, size, tracts, exudate (any fluid that has been forced out of the tissue in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications and supplies by the expiration date. The facility census was 127. Record review of the facility's medication storage policy, dated November, 2018, showed the following information: -The nurse will check the expiration date of each medication before administering it; -No expired medication will be administered to a resident; -All expired medications will be removed from the active supply and destroyed in the facility, regardless of the amount remaining; -The medication will be destroyed in the usual manner. 1. Observation on 5/12/2021, at 10:15 A.M., of the 500 Hall medication administration cart showed the following over the counter medications and supplies being stored for current and future use: -One bottle of Folic Acid 400 micrograms (mcg) with expiration date 4/2021; -One bottle of Aspirin 325 milligram (mg) with expiration date 4/2021; -One bottle of Prenatal Multivitamins with best-by date of 2/2021; -One bottle of Ferrous Gluconate (iron replacement) 240 mg/ 27 mg with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide meals in a timely manner in accordance with the residents' preferences when staff served meals outside the posted hours. The facility census was 127. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Meals and Snacks, dated 3/31/2021, showed the following: -Meal service shall be provided to residents on a regularly scheduled basis according to facility established times; -Nutritional services shall be responsible for all food preparation including snacks and shall deliver meals (with assigned assistance) to the residents or to the nursing units. Nursing shall be responsible for delivering snacks to the residents; -Mealtimes shall be scheduled to ensure a maximum of fourteen hours from dinner to breakfast on the following day. An example of meal times is: Breakfast at 7:30 A.M., Lunch at 12:00 P.M., and Dinner at 6:00 P.M., -Nutritional Services, nursing and other departments, as assigned shall participate in the distribution of meals. 1. Review of the facility's current posted meal service times showed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to keep two residents (Resident #415 and Resident #64) free from misappropriation of property when staff took the resident's debit card and/or the resident's cash. The facility census was 127. Record review of the facility policy Abuse Prevention, dated 3/20/19, showed the following information: -The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to: facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual; -Misuse of Funds/Resident Property: The misappropriation or conversion for any purpose of a consumer's funds or property by an employee or employees with or without the consent of the consumer or the purchase of the property or services from a consumer in which the purchase price substantially varies from market value; -All facility staff shall be in-serviced upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged violation of misappropriation of resident property within 24 hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS)) for one resident (Resident #64). The facility census was 127. Record review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Prevention Policy and Procedure, revised on February 2017, showed the following information: -Policy is for all residents to have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This includes prohibiting nursing facility staff from taking or using photographs or recordings in any manner that would demean or humiliate a resident, and prohibits using any type of equipment (e.g., cameras, smart phones, and other electronic devices) to take, keep, or distribute photographs and/or recordings on social media or through multimedia messages. Residents must not be subjected to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice when staff failed to administer one resident's (Resident #34) oxygen as ordered and failed to care plan the resident's oxygen usage. The facility census was 127. 1. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding oxygen usage or following physician's orders. Record review of Resident #34's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date 5/4/2020; -Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe). Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 2/10/21, showed the following: -Moderately impaired cognition; -Extensive assist of two required for transfers; -Shortness of breath/trouble breathing on exertion and when lying flat; -Oxygen therapy required. Record review of the resident's physician's order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to complete wound care as ordered for two residents (Resident #167 and #173). The facility census was 127. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding following physician's orders. 1. Record review of Resident #167's face sheet showed, the following: -admit date of 4/22/21; -Diagnoses included open wounds of the right and left upper arms, psychoactive (affecting mind or mental processes) substance abuse, muscle wasting and atrophy (decreased muscle mass) of right and left upper arms, elevated white blood count, and osteomyelitis (bone infection) of vertebrae. Record review of the resident's care plan, dated 5/5/21, showed the following: -Impaired skin integrity as evidenced by trauma injuries to bilateral forearms related to surgical history; -Perform treatment to wound per current treatment order. Assess wound for signs and symptoms of infections with each dressing change/treatment. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-13 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLORISSANT SPRINGFIELD HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/08/2018 |
| SPRINGFIELD FLORISSANT RESOURCES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 08/08/2018 |
| SPRINGFLO INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 35% | since 08/08/2018 |
| ANDERSON, HOLLY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/08/2018 |
| BIENSTOCK, JUDAH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/08/2018 |
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265188. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.