No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Florissant Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center

1200 Graham Road, Florissant, MO 63031 · For profit - Corporation · 98 certified beds · (314) 838-6555 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 838-6555 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Jun 2024Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1225 Graham Rd Ste C-1330 · (314) 838-5702 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
345 Dunn Rd · (314) 921-4242 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
MBMC0.6 mi
7102 N Hanley Rd · (314) 540-7473 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.8%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.7%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms76.6%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.5%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.7%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.7%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.1%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.8%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.7%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine31.7%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.2%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.6%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.862.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.362.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.2%CMS range 35.6–61.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.3–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay20.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
68.8%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 73.3 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-22)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

72 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-08-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately treat pain for one resident (Resident #2) who was actively dying. The sample size was three. The census was 72. Review of the facility's pain management policy, dated 11/15/22, showed:-Policy: The Facility will use a systematic approach to pain management; Recognition, evaluation, treatment, and monitoring of pain. Individuals experiencing pain may receive pharmalogical/non-pharmalogical interventions to assist in pain management. The Facility will provide employees education on pain management & opioid (class of drugs used for pain relief) overdose;-Recognition included recognizing when a resident was experiencing pain and identify circumstances when pain can be anticipated; Evaluate the resident for pain on admission and routinely; Manage/Prevent pain consistent with comprehensive evaluation and plan of care, current professional standards of practice and resident's goal/preferences;-Observe for non-verbal indicators of pain;-Nurses will complete a pain evaluation tool, appropriate for the resident's cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services per acceptable standards of practice for one resident (Resident #1), when the facility failed to follow physician orders for a new medication to treat nerve pain for 10 days after the resident returned from an appointment with the neurologist (physician who treats the nervous system). The sample size was 4. The census was 79.The administrator was notified on 10/29/25, of the past non-compliance. The administrator of the facility investigated immediately 10/12/25, in-serviced all staff on following up on resident outside appointments to ensure paperwork is received and reviewed when a resident returns from an appointment for new and or changed orders. Facility conducted a 100% audit of residents outside appointments for paperwork for new and/or changed orders and the Medical Director (MD) and resident representative notifications were completed on any missed orders. The past non-compliance was corrected on 10/17/25. Review of the facility's Physician Orders Policy, updated 9/28/22, showed:-Policy: To…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records as per their policies for one resident of three sampled residents (Resident #2). The facility failed to document assessments for the actively dying resident; failed to accurately document analgesics (pain medication) on narcotic accountability sheets and on the medication administration records; failed to document when morphine sulfate solution (opioid for moderate to severe pain) was delivered and then wasted by facility staff; failed to document when the resident ran out of morphine including notification to hospice and pharmacy; failed to document interactions with hospice staff and failed to document when a new bottle of morphine was delivered by hospice staff from a local pharmacy. The census was 72.Review of the facility's Medication ordering and receiving from pharmacy; Receiving controlled substances policy, dated 12/17, showed:-Policy: Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances and medications classified as controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was administered alprazolam (Xanax, used for anxiety) as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified timely when the medication was not delivered and the resident missed multiple doses. The resident experienced anxiety and tearfulness as a result (Resident #3). The sample was 4. The census was 78. Review of the controlled substance prescriptions policy, dated 8/2014, showed: -Policy: -Before a controlled drug can be dispensed, the pharmacy must be in receipt of a clear, complete and signed written prescription from a person lawfully authorized to prescribe. A chart order is not equivalent to a prescription for controlled drugs. Therefore, the prescriber issuing the chart order must also provide the pharmacist with a valid prescription. The written prescription may be faxed to the pharmacy for long term care residents; -Verbal orders for controlled medications are permitted for class II (CII, a class of drugs with a high potential for abuse) controlled drugs only in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the deficiency cited at Event H8S612. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #403) was provided a safe discharge home, by failing to ensure medical equipment was provided on the day of discharge and failing to educate the resident and family member on the use of the medical equipment. The sample was 23. The census was 75. Review of the facility's discharge plan/summary policy, dated 11/1/2018, showed: -Policy: An interdisciplinary summary is completed on a resident upon discharge to assure the continuum care needs of the resident are met; -Guidelines: Upon notification of impending discharge, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) should be notified to allow staff the opportunity to educate and implement a safe discharge. Social work should coordinate the discharge planning process. Therapy may complete a home assessment to ensure a safe discharge and arrange any assistive equipment needed for home care. Education with the person accepting responsibility for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences by failing to ensure call lights were in reach for six residents (Residents #12, #23, #174, #20, #175 and #6). The facility also failed to have one resident's communication device within reach (Resident #126). The sample was 19. The census was 83. 1. Review of Resident #12's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/19/24, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Always incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Required substantial assistance from staff for toileting and lower body dressing; -Required moderate assist from staff from lying to sitting at the side of the bed , sitting to standing and chair to bed transfers; -Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a chronic, progressive brain disorder that affects the nervous system and causes movement problems), dementia, stroke and seizures. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow general accounting principles by failing to employ proper bookkeeping techniques to track the amount of cash on hand used for resident withdrawals from the resident trust account. This affected 44 residents whose funds were handled by the facility. The census was 83. Review of the facility's petty cash daily log sheets, showed no ongoing tracking of the total amount of cash on hand at any given time and no monthly reconciliation. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 1:58 P.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said the facility keeps cash on hand for resident requests for cash. There is no set amount of cash kept on hand and the amount of cash available varies at any given time. The facility maintains a spreadsheet to show the date of cash requests and the amount withdrawn, but there is no running total to show how much money is in the cash box at any given time. She can calculate the amount that should be in the cash box by reviewing the resident trust fund account and subtracting pending transactions. They do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were changed in a timely manner (Residents #23, #25 and #44), failed to ensure residents received a minimum of two showers per week and activities of daily living (ADL) care as needed (Residents #2, #36, #45, #54, #66, #276 and #126), and failed to ensure residents were repositioned in bed as needed (Residents #126 and #41 ). The sample was 19. The census was 83. Review of the facility's ADL bathing policy, dated 7/21/22, showed: -Policy: nursing staff will assist in bathing residents to promote cleanliness and dignity. The charge nurse will be made aware of residents who refuse bathing; -Procedure: assist resident into the shower. Encourage them to hold onto to safety bars. Encourage resident to bathe him/herself and assist as needed. When resident has finished bathing instruct them to stand and ensure skin is free of soap. Assist with dressing and grooming as needed. Review of the facility's ADL shaving policy, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sufficient amount of nursing staff was available to meet the needs of residents, resulting in a resident left in bed (Resident #20), meals not delivered timely and served cold (Residents #54 and #40), residents not changed timely (Resident #25), and residents not receiving showers in accordance with their needs and preferences (Residents #20, #54, and #2). The sample was 19. The census was 83. 1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment, revised 7/20/24, showed: -Assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) monthly average included: -Bed mobility sit to lying, mobility sit to stand, bathing, transfers, and toileting: 34 with supervision/partial/moderate assistance, and 30 dependent/maximum assistance; -Eating: 51 with set up assistance, 16 with supervision/partial/moderate assistance, and 7 dependent/maximum assistance; -Staff Type/Plan: -10 to 15 licensed nurses providing direct care (Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure room trays were delivered to residents at a safe and palatable temperature affecting six residents (Residents #54, #40, #70, #275, #276 and #274). The sample was 19. The census was 83. Review of the facility's food safety and food handling policy, revised 8/16/23, showed: -Policy: food handling practices shall be consistent with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food code guidelines and comply with federal and state regulations governing food safety and prevention of foodborne illness; -Procedure: food handling practices shall be completed in a manner to protect food safety and avoid cross-contamination. Minimum internal temperatures for meat should be 145 degrees Fahrenheit (F). 1. Review of Resident #54's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included acquired absence of left leg above the knee and history of falling; -Cognitively intact. Observation on 11/18/24 at 9:13 A.M., showed the resident seated upright on the side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for residents with gastrostomy tubes (g-tube, a tube that is surgically inserted into the abdomen and is used for liquid nutrition and medications), wounds requiring treatments, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a thin tube inserted into the vein that is utilized for medications and fluids) (Residents #126, #3, #14, #41 and #27). The facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate infection control practices for two residents when providing perineal care (peri care, cleansing of the genitals)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 61 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in infection prevention and control as the infection preventionist (IP) for the facility's infection control program. The census was 83. Review of the facility's Surveillance of Healthcare Associated Infections policy, reviewed 10/7/21, showed: -Policy: Surveillance for Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI) will be completed to calculate baseline rates, detect outbreaks, track progress, and to determine trends to help prevent the development or spread of infection; -Responsibility: Director of Nursing (DON), infection control designee, and licensed nurses. During an interview with on 11/20/24 at 2:00 P.M., the DON said she did not have the IP certificate completed. She had worked on it all night. The previous IP left about one month ago. During an interview on 11/22/24 at 1:34 P.M., the Administrator said she thought the DON completed the IP certification. The last IP left in September, 2024. She expected the facility to have a designated person to complete the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat three residents (Resident #174, Resident #23, and Resident #55) with dignity by leaving a resident exposed to the hallway, speaking to residents in an unprofessional manner when they referred to residents as feeders in front of residents, and staff stood over residents while assisting residents with their meal. The sample was 19. The census was 83. Review of the facility's Residents' [NAME] of Rights, showed your rights and protections as a nursing home resident: -As a nursing home resident, you have certain rights and protections under federal and state law that help ensure you get the care and services you need; -You have the right to be treated with dignity and respect, as well as make your own schedule and participate in the activities you choose. 1. Review of Resident #174's medical records, showed; -An admission date of 11/12/24; -Diagnosis that included: stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), weakness, and heart disease.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications and to ensure staff adequately supervised residents during medication administration (Residents #26 and #128). The sample was 19. The census was 83. Review of the facility's Medication Administration - General Guidelines, dated December 2017, showed: -Policy: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so; -Administration: -Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber; -When medications are administered by mobile cart taken to the resident's location (room, dining area, etc.) medications are administered at the time they are prepared; -Residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the attending physician and in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medications; -The resident is always…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed within 30 days for the final accounting for residents who expired. This affected three residents who expired and had money in their accounts (Residents #133, #131, and #132). The census was 83. Review of the facility's Business Office - Resident Trust Fund Policy and Procedure, undated, showed: -Upon the discharge or passing of the resident, funds shall be disbursed as follows: --Medicaid residents: All personal funds must be reported to the State based on regulatory requirements involving estate recovery. These funds can only be released by the State or made payable directly to a mortuary to cover any unpaid funeral expense. A copy of an invoice reflecting the unpaid balance must be provided. 1. Review of Resident #133's resident fund account, showed the following: -Expired [DATE]; -Balance of $943.88; -TPL completed [DATE]. 2. Review of Resident #131's resident fund account, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, homelike environment by failing to address water stains on the ceiling near the window, peeling wallpaper and flaking paint on the ceiling due to water damage in one resident room which two residents shared (Resident #23 and #174). The sample was 19. The census is 83. Review of Resident #23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/26/24, showed: -The resident is rarely or never understood; -Diagnoses included heart disease, kidney disease, diabetes, stroke and dementia. Review of Resident #174's medical records, showed; -Diagnoses included stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), weakness and heart disease. Observation on 11/17/24 at 9:00 A.M., of Resident #23's and #174's room, showed the room had yellow ring stains on the ceiling above the window. The wall next to the bathroom had bubbled, peeled, and flaked paint. The ceiling near the doorway had flaked and bubbled paint. Family Member Z said when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a representative of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of resident transfers and discharges. The census was 83. Review of the facility's Discharge/Transfer - Involuntary policy, revised 10/7/21, showed: -Policy: Transfer and discharge includes movement of a resident to a bed outside of the facility whether that bed is in the same physical plant or not. Transfer and discharge does not refer to movement of a resident to a bed within the same certified facility; -The policy did not provide any guidance related to notification to the Ombudsman regarding resident transfers and discharges. Review of the facility's Discharge Plan/Summary - Voluntary policy, revised 10/7/21, showed no guidance related to notification to the Ombudsman regarding resident transfers and discharges. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 12:29 P.M., the Ombudsman said he/she has not received monthly notification of transfers and discharges from the facility in about five to six months. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 9:20 A.M., the Social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #403) was provided a safe discharge home, by failing to ensure medical equipment was provided on the day of discharge and failing to educate the resident and family member on the use of the medical equipment. The sample was 23. The census was 75. Review of the facility's discharge plan/summary policy, dated 11/1/2018, showed: -Policy: An interdisciplinary summary is completed on a resident upon discharge to assure the continuum care needs of the resident are met; -Guidelines: Upon notification of impending discharge, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) should be notified to allow staff the opportunity to educate and implement a safe discharge. Social work should coordinate the discharge planning process. Therapy may complete a home assessment to ensure a safe discharge and arrange any assistive equipment needed for home care. Education with the person accepting responsibility for the resident at home should be provided as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards by not providing transportation to two residents' medical appointments (Resident #66 and Resident #12). The sample was 19. The census was 83. 1. Review of Resident #66's medical record, showed diagnoses that include diabetes, morbid obesity, shortness of breath, obstructive sleep apnea (a condition that cause breathing to slow down or stop during sleep), heart failure and difficulty walking. Review of the resident's progress notes, showed: -On 8/28/24 at 3:10 P.M., Follow up with the pulmonary doctor and neurosurgery doctor forwarded to social worker; -On 10/9/24 at 2:56 P.M., The resident's pulmonary doctor's appointment rescheduled for 10/23/24 at 12:30 P.M. The resident was notified of new appointment. Will arrange transport. During an interview on 11/19/24 at 1:50 P.M., Medical Assistant U at the resident's neurosurgeon office said the resident's appointment was scheduled 9/30/24 and the resident was listed as no show and a new appointment has not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards by failing to identify one resident's wound and obtain a treatment order (Resident #14) and obtain proper skin care treatment orders for one resident (Resident # 66). The sample was 19. The census was 83. Review of the facility's Skin Integrity policy, reviewed 7/5/24, showed: -Purpose: to establish best practice guidelines for skin integrity monitoring and maintenance to reduce potential risk of skin breakdown where clinically appropriate; -Policy: Skin evaluations shall be completed upon admission and routinely, as per the care plan, to monitor skin integrity; Skin integrity risk factors will be evaluated upon admission and routinely, as per the care plan; Appropriate interventions will be initiated based on the risk factors identified; Lotion and moisture barrier products shall be available and applied as per the care plan; Minimize, as much as possible, any friction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice when staff failed to follow physician orders for oxygen use for two residents (Residents #46 and #14) and failed to consult the physician regarding oxygen administration at a higher rate than what was ordered for one resident (Resident #46). The sample was 19. The census was 83. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration and Storage policy, issued 1/1/24, showed: -Purpose: To ensure staff follow safety guidelines and regulation for storage and use of oxygen; -General guidelines included: -Pulse Oximetry (a device used to determine oxygen saturation, the percentage of oxygen in the blood): -Residents who have oxygen orders should have oxygen saturation levels measured by oximetry. The physician should be notified of any concerns identified with oxygen titration (the increasing or decreasing of oxygen needed to maintain therapeutic oxygen levels in the blood) needs so the physician may determine a need to change the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who received dialysis (the clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) had documented assessments and monitoring related to dialysis. The facility identified seven residents who received dialysis, and two residents were sampled (Resident #275 and #70). The sample was 19. The census was 83. On 11/21/24 at 10:56 A.M., an email was sent to the Assistant Director of Nursing for a policy regarding care for a resident receiving dialysis service. As of the exit date, on 11/22/24, no policy was provided. 1. Review of Resident #70's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/6/24, showed: -admission date 10/6/24; -Cognitively intact; -The resident is receiving hemodialysis while at the facility; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, high cholesterol, end stage kidney disease with dialysis, and asthma. Review of the care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed: -Focus: resident receives…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when expired medications were in the nurse medication carts and in the medication supply rooms. The facility had two medication rooms and four medication carts. The census was 83. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 11/18, showed: -Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications; -Procedures: Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from the inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. Certain medications or package types such as multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurately documented when staff failed to document the circumstances surrounding a discharge from the facility for one resident (Resident #72) and when an employee documented completion of neurological assessments for one resident (Resident #35) during shifts the employee did not work. The sample was 19. The census was 83. 1. Review of Resident #72's medical record, showed: -admission date 5/29/24; -Diagnoses included seizures, diabetes, heart failure, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), dementia, schizophrenia (serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) and bipolar disorder (mood disorder with intense mood swings). -discharged [DATE]; -A progress note, dated 8/28/24 in which staff documented the interdisciplinary team (IDT) met to review the resident's skilled therapy stay. The resident participates in therapy and desires to return to prior level of functioning; -No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See deficiencies cited at NRN712 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service by not designating a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services after the Dietary Manager (DM) was terminated on 7/30/24. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 76.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See deficiencies cited at NRN712 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen equipment clean and floors free of debris, grease, and grime by not following their monthly, weekly, and daily cleaning lists. Additionally, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent potential cross-contamination and failed to label and date food items. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. The census was 76.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See deficiencies cited at NRN712 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to control the presence of flies and gnats in the kitchen. The census was 76.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service by not designating a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services after the Dietary Manager (DM) was terminated on 7/30/24. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 76. Review of the facility's Sanitation Inspection policy, last reviewed on 11/27/23, showed: -Policy: Nutritional Services shall ensure a clean and sanitary work environment; to promote and protect food safety; and to maintain compliance with Federal, State, and Local regulations governing food sanitation and safety; -Nutritional Services employee shall ensure routine and thorough monitoring of the department sanitation by use of a sanitation check list; -The DM or designee shall complete a sanitation inspection on a monthly basis or more often if necessary. The inspection shall be reviewed with the Registered Dietician (RD) and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen equipment clean and floors free of debris, grease, and grime by not following their monthly, weekly, and daily cleaning lists. Additionally, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent potential cross-contamination and failed to label and date food items. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. The census was 76. Review of the facility's refrigeration policy, last revised 8/16/23, showed: -Policy: Ensure food storage and safety practices are maintained and monitored and comply with Federal and State regulations governing food storage and safety; -Refrigeration units shall have temperatures monitored twice daily by the Manager or his/her designee; --Temperatures shall be recorded daily and maintained in the Manager's office for a period of one year; -Internal thermometers shall be placed in the front section of each unit and shall be large enough for easy visibility. Refrigeration temperatures shall be maintained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to control the presence of flies and gnats in the kitchen. The census was 76. Observation of the kitchen on 8/12/24 at 9:42 A.M., showed several flies and gnats throughout the food prep areas of the kitchen, outside of the walk-in cooler, and inside the dry food storage room. There were flies and gnats outside of the walk-in cool, in the dishwasher area, and outside of the ice machine. There was a swarm of gnats over the steam table, the dining room pass through window and under the disinfecting sinks around the grease trap. There were also gnats floating in and swarming around a large, clear rectangular container which was filled with approximately three inches of cloudy water. The container was underneath a large industrial food steamer. During an interview on 8/12/24 at 10:30 A.M., the Dietary [NAME] (DC) said the container was under the steam table to catch the run off water from the industrial steamer. The kitchen was dirty which attracted the flies and gnats. She expected the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse and neglect policy for employee screening. The facility failed to re-check an employee's criminal background and federal indicator (identifies when a staff person who has ever held a certified nursing assistant (CNA) certificate, has ever been found to have abused, neglected, or misappropriated resident property) through the state nurse aide registry prior to allowing that employee to return to work in the facility after employment had been terminated, for one employee. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy, revised 10/21/22, showed: Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, and staff form other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual; -The facility conducts employee background checks and will not knowingly employ any individual who has been convicted of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for one of three sampled residents by not frequently repositioning the resident and not providing incontinence care in a timely manner (Resident #5). The census was 91. Review of the facility's Wound Management policy, last reviewed on 11/15/22, showed: -Policy: To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, the facility will provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with Standards of Practice and Physician Orders; -Wound Treatments will be provided in accordance with physician's order: Cleansing method, type of dressing and frequency of dressing change. Review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, Version 3.0, Chapter 3, Section M,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity, in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life when staff entered the resident's room and unplugged his/her TV without the resident's permission while the resident was watching TV (Resident #19). The census was 72. Review of the Residents' Rights signage posted throughout the building, showed: -Right to a Dignified Existence; -Right to Self-Determination. Review of Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/16/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, stroke, dementia, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), depression and anxiety. Review of the resident's care plan, undated, showed: -Focus: Resident had a psychosocial well-being problem related to adjustment to a health care facility for long term care; -Goal:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents could safely administer their own medications for three residents observed with medications in their room or left at their bed side (Residents #36, #59 and #77). The census was 72. Review of the facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy, dated 12/2017, included the following: -Policy: In order to maintain the resident's highest level of independence, residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self administer; -Procedures: -A. If the resident desires to self-administer medications, an assessment is conducted by the interdisciplinary team of the resident's cognitive (including orientation to time), physical, and visual ability to carry out this responsibility during the care planning process; -B. If the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of individual needs and preferences by failing to ensure call lights were in reach for two residents (Residents #27 and #40). The census was 72. 1. Review of Resident #27's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Mild cognitive impairment; -Required total staff assistance for transfers and extensive staff assistance for moving about the facility; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, diabetes, stroke, dementia, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), anxiety and depression. Observation and interview 6/5/23 at 9:57 A.M., showed the resident lay in bed. The call light was under the resident's bed. The resident said the call light was not usually in reach. It didn't do him/her any good anyway. Observation on 6/7/23 at 6:00 A.M., showed the resident lay in bed. The call light was under the resident's bed. Observation on 6/7/23 at 9:32 A.M., showed the resident in bed with the head of bed raised. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0571 — isolated
    Limit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a free basic haircut for Medicaid residents (Residents #3, #24 and #26). This had the potential to affect all Medicaid residents. The census was 72. Record review of the Missouri Department of Social Services, MO Health Net Division State Regulations for Medicaid Reimbursement for Long Term Care Facilities, showed the following: -13 CSR 70-10.010 (5) Covered Supplies, Items and Services. All supplies, items and services covered in the per-diem rate must be provided to the resident as necessary. Supplies and services which would otherwise be covered in a per diem rate but which also are billable to the Title XVIII Medicare program must be billed to that program for facilities participating in the Title XVIII Medicare program. Covered supplies, items and services include, but are not limited to, the following: (K) All routine care items, including disposables and including, but not limited to, those items specified in Appendix A to this rule; -Appendix A showed the following items covered under the per diem rate for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse and neglect policy for employee screening. The facility failed to check new employees' criminal background prior to employment for three out of ten employee files reviewed. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention policy, revised 10/21/22, included: -Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to facility staff; -Screening: The facility will pre-screen all potential new employees. 1. Review of the Human Resource (HR) Specialist's employee file, showed: -Date of hire: 10/4/22; -Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR, can qualify as a criminal background check, in addition to other required checks) completed on 6/7/23. . 2. Review of [NAME] X's employee file, showed: -Date of hire: 12/29/22; -FCSR completed on 1/12/23. 3. Review of Nurse W's employee file, showed: -Date of hire: 2/27/23; -FCSR completed on 3/30/23. 4. During an interview on 6/8/23 at 2:00 P.M., the HR Specialist said she is responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) receive necessary services to maintain adequate personal hygiene and grooming for three residents (Resident #181, Resident #69 and Resident #32). The sample was 30. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living Bathing policy, dated 7/21/22, showed: -Policy: Nursing staff will assist in bathing residents to promote cleanliness and dignity; The charge nurse will be made aware of residents who refuse bathing; -Responsibility: Nursing assistant, charge nurse, nursing administration, and Director of Nursing (DON); -Procedure: -Equipment and Supplies: -Shower Chair -Lotion, deodorant, comb and hairbrush; -Face cloth & bathing towels; -Gown, pajamas, or outfit; -Personal Protective Equipment (PPE); -Bathing blanket, if indicated. -Showers: -Place equipment on bedside/over bed table; -Place Supplies within reach; -Assist the resident into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities to meet the interests and well-being for two residents when staff failed to provide one on one (1:1) visits for one resident who preferred to stay in their room, and an alternate means of watching TV when the facility's cable provider was out of service. (Resident #27 and Resident #181). The sample was 30. The census was 72. 1. Review of Resident #27's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/3/22, showed: -Mild cognitive impairment; -Activity Preferences: -How important is it to keep up with the news: Very important; -How important is it participate in religious services: Very important; -How important is listen to music: Somewhat important; -How important is it to be with groups of people: Somewhat important. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Mild cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff promptly identified, documented and notified the physician of one resident with an open area on the coccyx (the small triangular bone at the base of the spine). Five resident skin assessments were completed and problems were found with one (Resident #42). The census was 72. Review of the facility's Skin Management Guidelines Practice Guidelines, dated 2/2016 and last revised on 7/2017, showed: -Purpose: -To identify at risk residents for potential breakdown or ulcerations; -To prevent breakdown issues; -To provide treatment that promotes prevention of ulcerations and healing of existing ulcerations; -Risk Factors: -Impaired mobility; -Cognitive impairment; -Exposure of skin to urinary or fecal incontinence; -Residents With Skin Impairments Will Have: -Appropriate interventions implemented to promote healing; -A physician's order for treatment; -Wound location and characteristics documented in the electronic health record; -Care plan implemented; -Ongoing monitoring and continuous quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement safety interventions for one resident, who was assessed as cognitively impaired, nonverbal and a high risk to elope/wander. The resident signed himself/herself out multiple times without nursing staff's knowledge, and on one occasion staff found him/her, uninjured about 0.2 miles near a convenience store located near a busy intersection (Resident #70). Additionally, staff failed to ensure one resident, who required limited assistance to transfer, was transferred using a gait belt (Resident #32). The census was 72. 1. Review of Resident #70's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/16/23, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -Hearing: Minimal difficulty; -Vision: Moderately impaired; -Speech Clarity: No speech - absence of spoken words; -Makes Self Understood: Rarely/never understood; -Ability to Understand Others: Rarely/never understands; -Short and long term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #52) who received tube feeding (supplies liquid nutrition) through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) received the appropriate treatment and services. The sample size was 30. The census was 72. Review of the facility's Continuous Tube Feeding policy, dated February 2016, showed: -To provide nourishment to the resident who is unable to obtain nourishment orally; -Procedure: -Verify physician order for feeding; -Gather necessary equipment for procedure; -Identify resident and explain procedure; -Provide privacy; -Perform hand hygiene and apply gloves; -Wear clean gloves; -Always keep resident receiving continuous feedings in semi-Fowler's (a body position at 30° head-of-bed elevation) or higher position; -Pour prescribed enteral feeding into feeding bag and prime tubing; -Clamp tubing and remove plug; -Unclamp tubing and flush per facility policy; -Clamp…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications with a less than five percent medication error rate. Out of 25 opportunities for error, two errors occurred, resulting in an 8% medication error rate (Resident #55). The sample size was 30. The census was 72. Review of Resident #55's quarterly Minimum Data Set, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/24/23, showed: -Clear speech, distinct intelligible words; -Usually understood; -Usually understands; -Extensive assistance of one person required for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and bathing; -Diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (low/high blood sugar), hemiplegia (partial or total paralysis on one side of the body)/hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body). Review of the resident's physician's order sheet, showed the following orders: -An order for levetiracetam oral solution (used to treat seizures) 7.5 milliliters (ml) at 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M.; -An order for modafinil tablet 200 milligrams (mg) one time a day at 8:00 A.M. for narcolepsy (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the opportunity to receive the Pneumococcal vaccine, unless documentation showed the vaccine was medically contraindicated, refused or the resident was already immunized. The facility failed to offer the Pneumococcal vaccine for two out of five residents sampled (Resident #24 and Resident #32). The census was 72. Review of the facility's Pneumococcal vaccine policy, dated 4/28/22, showed: -The opportunity to receive the Pneumococcal vaccine will be extended to all residents. The facility will provide pertinent information regarding the risks and benefits of receiving the vaccine; -Procedure: -The residents will be offered the Pneumococcal vaccine upon admission; -Administration of additional doses will be completed in accordance with Centers of Disease Control (CDC) guidelines; -Residents and the resident representatives will be notified of the availability the Pneumococcal vaccine; -Obtain consent; -Consent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call light system with working audio and visual components for two of 30 sampled residents. (Residents #32 and #181). The facility failed to provide alternative or assistive devices to dependent residents when it was determined the call light system was not working and needed repairs. The census was 72. 1. Review of Resident #32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/29/23, showed: -Highly impaired vision; -Cognitively intact; -Required extensive assistance from staff for toilet use and personal hygiene; -Required limited assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and eating; -Diagnosis included high blood pressure, stroke and dementia. Review of the resident's care plan, undated, showed: Focus: The resident is at risk for falls related to gait and balance problems, incontinence, blindness, dizziness and requires assist with all mobility; Interventions: Educate family to ask for assistance to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure they kept the floors clean, kept the areas above the dishwasher clean, and kept the area next to the preparation table in the preparation area clean. The facility census was 77. 1. Observation on 5/13/19 at 11:46 A.M., showed multiple white flakes and various small particles on the floor in the grout area (between the tiles) on the kitchen floor. Observation on 5/17/19 at 10:38 A.M., showed multiple white specks on the kitchen floor by the dishwasher/oven/food prep areas. The particles could be moved with a thumb nail. The flakes stuck to the floor and the grout area had a tacky feel. A clay-like/gummy/oily material, dark in color, which could be removed with a thumbnail lined the black grout of the kitchen floor by the dishwasher/oven/food preparation areas. Observation on 5/17/19 at 1:15 P.M., showed up to a 1/16 inch dark tacky/oily substance dislodged from the floor in small chucks when using a thumb nail, in the area on the grout between the tiles in the kitchen preparation area. 2. Observation on 5/17/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-05-22 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to conduct and document a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility census was 77. 1. Review of the facility assessment, last updated 4/15/19, showed the intent of the facility assessment is for the facility to evaluate its resident population and identify the resources needed to provide the necessary person-centered care and services the residents require. Review of the facility assessment, showed facility staff involved in completing the assessment included the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and the Regional Nurse Consultant. Review showed the facility did not document the medical director was included in the development and/or review of the facility assessment. Review of the facility's census and conditions form (CMS-672), the facility residents included the following: -Six with indwelling or external catheters; -63 that are occasionally or frequently incontinent of bladder; -48 that are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide care in a dignified manner for five residents (Residents #2, #12, #14, #18, and #37) during the provision of care. The facility census was 77. 1. Review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 3/22/19, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Required extensive assistance from staff with toileting, bed mobility, personal hygiene and dressing; -Required staff supervision and cueing when eating; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 5/16/19 at 5:22 P.M., showed the staff served the resident ham, vegetables, mashed potatoes and apple crisp for dinner in the dining room. Further observation showed two other residents sat at the table assisted by unknown staff. Observation showed the resident slowly fed him/herself mashed potatoes while leaving food debris on his/her chin with each bite. Staff did not assist the resident or cue the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-22 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a record of personal possessions for two residents (Resident #88 and #96) out of a sample of seven. The facility census was 77. 1. Record review of the facility maintained admission dates for the period 05/01/18 through 05/21/19, showed Resident #88's admission date was 12/05/18. Record review on 05/21/19 of the facility maintained admission file, showed the facility did not complete a personal inventory log of Resident #88's items. During an interview on 05/21/19 at 10:37 A.M., the Business Office Manager said the facility did not keep an inventory for Resident #88. 2. Record review of the facility maintained admission dates for the period 05/01/18 through 05/21/19, showed Resident #96's admission date was 01/22/19. Record review on 05/21/19 of the facility maintained admission file, showed the facility did not complete a personal inventory log of Resident #96's items. During an interview on 05/21/19 at 10:37 A.M., the Business Office Manager said the facility did not keep an inventory for Resident #96.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-22 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account for 21 residents (Resident #7, #13, #17, #35, #38, #45, #51, #55, #58, #89, #94, #101, #103, #111, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116, #117 and #118). Also, the facility failed to use the personal funds of a resident exclusively for the resident and only when authorized in writing for eight residents (Resident #2, #13, #28, #52, #64, #69, #84 and #89) out of a sample of 13. Additionally, the facility failed to obtain authorization to manage personal funds for three residents (Resident #37, #40 and #96) out of a sample of three. The facility census was 77. 1. Record review of the facility's maintained Accounts Receivable A/R Aging Report for the period 08/08/18 through 05/21/19, dated 05/21/19, showed the following residents with personal funds held in the facility operating account: Resident Amount Held in Operating Account #7 $ 625.00 #13 $ 486.33 #17 $ 1,381.23 #35 $ 40.00 #38 $ 27.05 #45 $ 2.25 #51 $ .01 #55 $ .01 #58 $ 29.50 #89 $…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to reconcile resident trust fund accounts monthly. Also, the facility failed to provide a written statement showing the current balance and all transactions to the resident or his/her designee on a quarterly basis. The facility census was 77. 1. Record review of the facility's maintained Resident Trust Fund Account for the period 08/2018 through 05/2019, showed the facility provided bank statements that were not reconciled to the total of resident funds. Record review of the facility's maintained reconciliation attempts to show the total of the resident trust accounts, but there is no documentation to verify the amounts equal. During an interview on 05/21/19 at 3:15 P.M., the Business Office Manager said the reconciliation does not include the step to reconcile the statement with the Resident Trust Fund Ledger total. 2. Record review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Fund Account for the period 08/08/18 through 05/21/19, showed the facility did not provide Quarterly Statements to the residents or designees. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a final accounting of individual resident trust fund balances within 30 days to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate for three residents (Resident #103, #108 and #111) out of a sample of six. Also, the facility failed to provide Medicaid spend down letters when the balance of the resident's trust fund account exceeded $2,800.00 for two residents (Resident #28 and #84) out of a sample of two. The facility census was 77. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Discharge Report for the period [DATE] through [DATE], dated [DATE], showed Resident #108 expired on [DATE]. Record review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Fund Ledger, for the period [DATE] through [DATE], showed the facility failed to refund Resident #108's funds held in the Resident Trust Fund account in the amount of $2,721.82. Review showed a Personal Funds Balance Sheet for the $2,721.82 was not submitted to the Department of Social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-22 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to ensure protection of resident funds. The facility census was 77. 1. Record review of the facility's attempted Resident Trust Fund Reconciliation for the period 08/2018 through 05/17/19, showed an average monthly balance of $33,127.27. Record review of the facility maintained Accounts Receivable A/R Aging Report for the period 08/01/18 through 05/21/19, dated 05/21/19, showed the facility held an average balance of resident funds in the amount of $20,927.78 in the facility operating account. Record review of the facility's current surety bond showed the facility held a bond in the amount of $50,000.00, which was insufficient by $31,000.00.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-22 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide information to the residents regarding results of the most recent survey of the facility and plan of correction, failed to post accurate notice of the availability of the survey results in an area of the facility that is prominent and accessible to the public, and the failed to make confidential the identifying information about the residents. The facility census was 77. 1. During an interview on 05/15/19 at 11:15 A.M., during the Resident Council Meeting, ten residents and the Activity Director said they have not seen the state survey inspection results available to read for the public and themselves. Review of the State Survey Notebook on 05/15/19 at 5:22 P.M., showed the Resident Identifiers page present with resident names listed. Observation on 05/17/19 at 11:43 A.M., upon entrance into the facility, showed a Welcome sign posted by the front entrance doors that read U [NAME] Results in Parlor. Further observation showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-22 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission and failed to document the baseline care plan was reviewed with the resident or responsible party for five residents (Residents #2, #5, #18, #76, and #227) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 77. 1. Review of the facility's Baseline Care Plan policy, dated April 2017, showed facility staff were directed to do the following: -To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission; -The Interdisciplinary team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs including, but not limited to: initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services and Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) recommendation; -The resident and their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #9's significant change MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 2/7/19, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively intact; -Required supervision and cueing by staff with eating; -Weight was 181 lbs. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively intact; -Required supervision with eating; -Weight was 164 lbs. Review of the nutrition progress note, dated 3/20/2019, showed the Registered Dietician (RD) assessed the resident's significant weight loss over the last three months. The RD documented that staff should monitor for further weight loss or decreases in the resident's food/fluid intakes. Review of the resident's comprehensive care plan showed staff documented the following interventions for nutrition: -Provide diet education as needed; -Honor food preferences; -Monitor and report any signs and symptoms of choking, coughing, pocketing and drooling; -Holding food in the mouth, refusing to eat or concerns with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure they provided services that meet professional standards when staff failed to aquire a physican's order for a catheter for one resident (Resident #2) and staff did not document that four residents (Residents #2, #5, #17, and #46) received their physican ordered medications in the electronic medication administration records (MAR). This affected four of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 5/1/19, showed the facility staff assessed the resident as: -Had an indwelling catheter; -Had an ostomy. Review of the resident's comprehensive care plan directed staff on the following interventions for complications related to having a colostomy: -Colostomy care as needed; -Follow facility bowel protocol for bowel management; -Monitor medications for side effects of constipation/diarrhea. Keep physician informed of any problems;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed failed to provide activities for daily living when staff failed to provide complete incontinent care every two hours for two residents (Resident #18 and #37), failed to offer fluids to one resident (Resident #37), and failed to reposition three residents (Resident #12, Resident #18, and Resident #37) at least every two hours. This affected three of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as: -Mild cognitive impairment for daily decision making; -Has not refused care; -Required extensive assistance on one staff for bed mobility, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene; -Dependent on two or more staff for transferring; -Dependent on one staff toileting; -Limited range of motion to both upper extremities; -Bathing had not occurred during time period; -Always incontinent of bowel and bladder; -At risk for developing pressure ulcers; -Had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure the hot water temperatures did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) in nine resident rooms (rooms 60, 72, 84, 94, 106, 108, 64, 69, 68, 94, and 108), which 15 residents occupied . The facility census was 77. 1. Observation on 5/13/19, starting at 12:03 P.M., showed: - The hot water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 123.7 °F. - The hot water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 128.5 °F; - The hot water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 128.3 °F; - The hot water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 127.8 °F; - The hot water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 125.9 °F; - The hot water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 126.6 °F; 2. Observation on 5/14/19, starting at 11:17 A.M., showed: - The hot water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 129.9 °F; - The hot water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 126.3 °F. 3. Observation on 5/15/19, starting at 10:55 A.M., showed: - The hot water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services and that nurse aides were trained to care for residents' needs. Staff failed to demonstrate care in a dignified manner for five residents (Resident #2, #12, #14, #18, #37), failed to demonstrate timely incontinence care for two residents (Resident #12, #37) and failed to provide timely repositioning for three residents (Resident #12, #18, #37). Additionally, facility staff failed to offer or encourage fluids for one resident (Resident #37), and failed to demonstrate interventions to prevent significant weight loss for one resident (Resident #12). Further, the facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered by the the physician for four residents (Resident #19, #45, #46, #49), failed to document the administration of significant medications for three residents (Resident #2, #18, #46) and failed to demonstrate handwashing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record, the facility staff failed to ensure one resident who took routine Serequel (an antipsychotic medication) had a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) (an attempt to reduce residents off of antipsychotic medications) for one resident (Resident #37) and failed to ensure one resident (Resident #5) who took a PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days. This affected two residents (Residents #5 and #37) of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 77. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) and Reporting Policy, dated May 2016, showed staff were directed to do the following: -The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly. Findings and recommendations are communicated to those with authority and/or responsibility (Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and attending physician and medical director) to implement the recommendations and respond to in an appropriate and timely fashion; -The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Out of 28 opportunities observed, eight errors occurred, resulting in a 28.6% error rate which affected three residents (Residents #19, #46, and #49). The facility census was 77. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Administration General Guidelines Policy, dated May 2016, showed facility staff were directed to do the following: -Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) with the medication label. If the label and MAR are different and the container is not flagged indicating a change in directions, or if there is any other reason to question the dosage or directions, the prescriber's orders are checked for the correct dosage schedule; -Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber; -Obtain and record any vital signs as necessary prior to medication administration; -Verify medication is correct three times before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility licensed staff failed to ensure four residents (Residents #2, #18, #45, #46) were free of significant medication errors when staff did not administer medications to the residents as ordered by the physician. Facility census was 77. 1. Record review of the facility's Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated May 2016, showed staff were directed to do the following: -Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber; -The individual who administers the medication dose, records the administration on the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) immediately following the medication being given. In no case should the individual who administered the medications report off-duty without first recording the administration of any medications; -The resident's MAR is initialed by the person administering the medication, in the space provided under the date, and on the line for that specific medication dose administration and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure they followed the recipes and menus planned and approved in advance by the Registered Dietitian (RD). The facility census was 77. 1. Review of the RD approved menu, dated 5/17/19, showed all residents needed to receive: - Baked chicken; - Stuffing with gravy; - Sweet peas & carrots; - English toffee dessert; - Milk; - Beverage. During an interview on 5/17/19 at 10:51 A.M., the DM said the facility currently served 15 residents on a mechanically soft diet and four on a pureed diet. 2. Review of the recipe approved by the RD for pureed vegetables showed: - Vegetables drained and cooked; - Bread slices; - Vegetable juice; - Melted margarine or butter: - Place the vegetables into the food processor. Blend; - Add bread. Blend; - Add a small amount of juice, and blend. Alternate adding juice and blending until a smooth consistency; - Add butter or margarine, and blend; - Transfer to serving pan(s), and cover with foil; - Reheat; - Hold on the steamtable above 160 degrees Fahrenheit (°F); - Note: Use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to change gloves and wash hands while providing incontinence care for four residents (Residents #2, #12, #15, and #37). The facility census was 77. 1. Review of the facility's Policy and Procedure Handwashing, dated February 2016, showed staff were directed to perform hand hygiene by washing hands for at least fifteen seconds with antimicrobial (an agent that kills microorganisms) or non-antimicrobial soap and water and should be performed under the following conditions: -When hands are visibly dirty or soiled with blood or other body substances; -Before entering and leaving an isolation room; -Before applying gloves and removing gloves or other Personal Protection Equipment (PPE); -After contact with blood, body fluids, secretions, mucous membranes, or non-intact skin; -After handling items potentially contaminated with blood, body fluids, or secretions; -Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during care; -After providing direct resident care; -Before eating; -After using the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency, for one (Resident #60) of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 77. Review of the facility's Policy & Procedure Abuse and Neglect Prevention, dated revision February 2017, showed: -To establish guidelines that prevents, identifies, and reports resident abuse and neglect; -All residents have the right to be free from abuse/neglect; -It shall be the policy of this facility to implement written procedures that prohibit abuse/neglect; -These procedures shall include timely reporting of abuse/neglect; -Reporting: All allegations of resident abuse/neglect shall be reported to the state survey agency, not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than twenty -four hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury; -A report shall be made by calling or emailing your survey agency as they have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to provide treatments as order by the physician for two residents (Resident #5 and # 46) with vascular wounds. The facility census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 12/8/18, showed staff assessed the resident as: -admission date of 12/1/2018; -No cognitive impairment; -Required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene; -Occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Occasional pain; -Had falls in the last six months prior to admission; -A risk for pressure ulcers; -Received antipsychotics six out of seven days, antidepressants seven out of seven days, opioids four out of seven days, during the last seven days or since admission/entry if less than seven days. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), April 2019, showed the physician ordered the following treatments to be administered: -Santyl…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2) out of four residents with pressure ulcers received the treatment as ordered by the physician and failed to provide the pressure ulcer documentation required in the weekly wound report. The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 5/1/19, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Required extensive assistance from staff with toileting, personal hygiene and bed mobility; -One sided weakness; -Received more than 51% of nutrition by a feeding tube; -Mechanically altered diet; -Indwelling catheter; -Ostomy; -At risk for the development of a pressure ulcer; -One Stage I (intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence) pressure ulcer or higher present upon admission; -One Stage III (full thickness tissue loss with visible bone, tendon or muscle but not exposed) pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one (Resident #14) of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #14's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 2/18/19, showed staff assessed the resident as the following: -Highly impaired hearing/no hearing aid; -No speech; -Rarely/never understood; -Rarely/never understands; -Highly impaired vision/no corrective lenses; -Severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making; -Has not refused care; -Dressing: extensive assistance/one person physical assist; -Upper extremity/lower extremity: both had impairment on one side; -Diagnosis: aphasia, dementia, hemiplegia or hemiparesis, and depression. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 03/11/2019, showed: -The resident has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure acceptable parameters for nutritional status were maintained, failed to provide assistance with eating to prevent significant weight loss, and failed to notify the Physician and resident representative of the significant weight loss for one resident (Resident #12) of five residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 18 residents. The facility census was 77. 1. Review of the facility's Weight and Hydration Management Overview Practice Guidelines Policy, dated February 2016, directed staff to do the following: -Registered Dietician will complete Nutrition Risk Assessment on admission and the dietary manager will complete the dietary profile; -Nurses will assess resident oral status and nutrition status on admission assessment; -Accurate weights are obtained by having staff follow a consistent approach to weighing and by using an appropriately serviced and functioning scale; -The facility will establish a weight management…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure they made the pureed food timely to prevent a skim from forming and to ensure the pureed food had a smooth consistency free of chunks. The facility census was 77. 1. During an interview on 5/17/19 at 10:51 A.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said the kitchen staff had already pureed most of the foods and they placed the pureed foods into the steamer. They typically completed their purees around 10:00-10:15 A.M. and kept them in the steamer until they are served at the 12:00 noon meal times. Observation on 5/17/19 at 12:43 P.M. showed a three inch by three inch skim had formed over the pureed chicken. [NAME] A served out the pureed foods while the skim was formed over the top of the pureed chicken. During an interview on 5/17/19 at 1:11 P.M., the DM said he had been trained to puree foods far in advance of the meals. He did not know that if they started them so early it can cause the pureed foods to dry out, form lumps, or create skim over the top of the pureed foods. 2. Observation on 5/17/19 at 11:40 A.M., showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-06-09 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups such as adult protective services and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation, including but not limited to resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents. The census was 72. Observations throughout the survey from 6/5/23 through 6/8/23, showed staff did not provide any contact information regarding the the State Survey agency. During a resident council meeting on 6/7/23 at 11:30 A.M., five out of five residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, said they did not know where contact information for the State Survey agency was kept. They did not know how to report a complaint to the State Survey agency. During an interview on 6/8/23 at 5:37 P.M., the Interim Administrator said the State Survey agency contact information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Arbor Hills Care & Rehab CenterFerguson, MO 1 of 5Bentwood Nursing & RehabFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Broadway Care & Rehab CenterMuskogee, OK 1 of 5Lansdowne VillageSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Leisure Village Health Care CenterTulsa, OK 1 of 5Normandy Nursing CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Quarters At Des Peres, TheDes Peres, MO 1 of 5South Pointe Rehabilitation and Care CenterOklahoma City, OK 1 of 5Springfield Skilled Care CenterSpringfield, MO 1 of 5St Sophia Health & Rehabilitation CenterFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Eastgate Village Care & Rehab CenterMuskogee, OK 2 of 5Heritage Villa Care & Rehab CenterBartlesville, OK 2 of 5Sherbrooke VillageSaint Louis, MO 2 of 5Spring Valley Health & Rehabilitation CenterSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Sunset Health Care CenterUnion, MO 2 of 5Walnut Grove Care & Rehab CenterMcAlester, OK 3 of 5Forest Hills Care And Rehabilitation CenterBroken Arrow, OK 3 of 5Fort Gibson Care & Rehab CenterFort Gibson, OK 3 of 5Oak Park Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 4 of 5Cleveland Care And Rehab CenterCleveland, OK 4 of 5Coweta Care & Rehab CenterCoweta, OK 4 of 5Jackson ManorJackson, MO 4 of 5Mitchell Care & Rehab CenterMcAlester, OK 4 of 5Rainbow Health Care Community And Rainbow AssistedBristow, OK 4 of 5Seminole Care And Rehabilitation CenterSeminole, OK 5 of 5Camelot Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFarmington, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FLORISSANT SPRINGFIELD HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/08/2018
SPRINGFIELD FLORISSANT RESOURCES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 08/08/2018
SPRINGFLO INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST35%since 08/08/2018
LEVY, ARIELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 08/08/2018
SWEET, ANGELAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/26/2022
BIENSTOCK, JUDAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/08/2018

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$894K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 8%Other / private 21%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $894K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$272per resident / day
operating cost
$8,268per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$277per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265112. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next