Sunset Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.91 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.01 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to propel four (Resident #3, #7, #24, and #111) out of six residents in a wheelchair in a manner to ensure resident safety. The facility census was 114. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for wheelchair safety. 2. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 05/14/25, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively impaired; -Required partial to moderate assistance for ambulation greater than 50 feet; -No wheelchair. Observation on 05/28/25 at 9:11 A.M., showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E propelled from the 200 secured unit to the 100 hallway to the scale, weigh the resident, and return the resident to the 200 hallway. The wheelchair did not have leg pedals in place and the bottom of the resident's feet slid on the floor. During an interview on 05/28/25 at 9:22 A.M., LPN E said he/she borrowed a wheelchair to take the resident to get…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0570 — pattern
  Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to purchase a surety bond in an amount sufficient to assure security of all resident funds the facility holds. The facility census was 114. 1. Review of the resident's trust fund account for July 2024 through April 2025, showed an average monthly balance of $199,493.16, which required a surety bond of $300,000.00. Review of the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) database, showed the facility has an approved non-cancelable Escrow Agreement Account in the amount of $250,000.00. During an interview on 05/28/25 at 1:42 P.M., the business office manager (BOM) said he/she is responsible for resident funds and ensuring the bond is sufficient. He/She said he/she is aware their bond needs to be increased. He/She said they have had several changes that have made their monthly balance increase, and he/she noticed it was getting close to the bond amount. During an interview on 05/29/25 at 12:57 P.M., the administrator said the BOM is responsible for resident funds and ensuring the surety bond is sufficient. He/She said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to complete hand hygiene between glove changes during wound care for three residents (Resident #4, #28,and #216) of three sampled residents with wounds and when staff failed to ensure the two-step purified protein derivative (PPD) (skin test for TB) was completed in accordance with their policy and on file for three employees (Certified nurse aide (CNA) N, Maintenance assistant, and Housekeeper O) out of ten employee files reviewed. The facility census was 114. 1. Review of the facility's Standard Precautions policy, dated October 2022, showed the policy did not contain direction or guidance for hand hygiene between glove changes. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated April 2022, showed staff are directed to perform hand hygiene before and after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to keep Resident #2 from striking Resident #1 twice to the chest. The facility census was 114. The administrator was notified on 3/27/25 of past Non-Compliance, which occurred on 3/22/25 when Resident #1 struck Resident #2 to the chest twice. Staff immediately separated the residents, assessed the residents, notified the resident's physician, moved Resident #1 to a different hallway, put Resident #2 on one on one, and in-serviced nursing staff on abuse and neglect. Staff corrected the deficient practice on 3/25/25. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse prevention policy, dated 10/21/22, showed abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. This includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Abuse may be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide an appropriate emergency discharge notice when staff failed to have an appropriate location to transfer one resident (Resident #2) to when he/she was ready to discharge from the hospital. The facility census was 114. 1. Review of the facility's Discharge and Transfer - Involuntary Policy, reviewed 10/07/2021, showed transfer and discharge includes movement of a resident to a bed outside of the facility whether that bed is in the same physical plant to not. The facility must permit each resident to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless specific criteria are met. The facility will provide sufficient orientation to residents to ensure a safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility including an opportunity to to participate in the decision of where to transfer. 2. Review of Resident #1's facesheet, dated 4/3/25, showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-05 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to designate a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services with the appropriate qualifications, when the facility did not employ a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional full-time. The census was 107. 1. Review of the dietary supervisor's (DS) personnel records, showed a hire date of 6/13/23 and promoted to the dietary supervisor on 10/22/23. Review showed the records did not contain documentation of prior dietary manager experience in a long-term care facility and certification or other education required for the director of nutritional services position. Review showed the DS had a course start date of 11/02/23 in an on-line Nutrition and Foodservice Professional Training Program. Review showed the DS had an estimated program completion date of 11/01/24. During an interview on 1/03/24 at 2:02 P.M., the DS said he/she needed to be a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) to hold the DS position. The DS said he/she was taking classes and had finished lesson one of 17 lessons.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to serve food in accordance with the nutritionally calculated menus and standardized recipes. Facility staff also failed to record substitutions made to the menus. The census was 107. 1. Review of the facility's Menu Alternates and Substitutions policy, reviewed 11/27/23, showed the policy did not contain guidance related to substitutions for preplanned menu items. Review of the facility's Menu Substitution Form showed the last documented food substitution was dated 11-23. 2. Review of the facility Week 1, Day 4 lunch menu, reviewed 5/30/23, showed the menu directed staff to provide residents who receive pureed meals with a #8 (four ounces) scoop of smothered steak, two ounce ladle of brown gravy, #10 (3.2 ounces) scoop pureed green beans, #20 (1.6 ounces) scoop of pureed wheat dinner roll or bread, and a #10 scoop of pureed fruit cup. Review of Week 1, Day 4 recipes showed pureed bread may be prepared separately or if added to meat or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain kitchen equipment and surfaces in a clean sanitary manner to prevent the potential for cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary, using approved techniques, to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to sanitize kitchen wares in a manner to prevent contamination, and to store dishwares in a manner to prevent cross-contamination when staff stacked dishwares together wet. Facility staff failed to ensure hair/beard coverings remained in place during the preparation of resident meals to prevent the potential for food contamination. The facility census was 107. 1. Review of the facility's Nutritional Services Sanitation policy, reviewed 11/27/23, showed: -Personnel shall be responsible for daily, weekly and monthly cleaning assignments as determined by the Dietary Manager and/or his/her designee; -Equipment shall be cleaned, sanitized, delimed, etc. in accordance with manufacturer recommendations; -Exhaust systems and hoods shall be clean,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-05 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) as the Infection Preventionist (IP) for the facility's infection prevention and control program. The census was 107. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for specialized training for the Infection Preventionist. During an interview on 01/05/24 at 10:15 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said they do not currently have a certified IP. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) is currently acting as the IP and their Regional Corporate Nurse (RNC), who is a certified IP, and himself/herself oversee IPC. He/She said he/she is not certified. He/She said it is the facility's plan the ADON is going to be the IP and the facility's wound nurse is going to be the backup IP after they both become certified. He/She said their last IP stepped down from the position in August and they have not had anyone else in that role. During an interview on 01/05/24 at 10:18 A.M., the ADON said he/she is not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide residents with a dignified environment when staff did not keep residents' personal information private, allowed one resident (Resident #72) to wear the same soiled clothes for three days, left one resident (Resident #30) exposed, did not speak in a dignified manner for one resident (Resident #12) and changed the residents' smoking times for two residents (Resident #76 and #102) for staff convenience. The facility census was 107. 1. Review of the facility's Residents' [NAME] of Rights, showed staff are to treat residents with dignity and respect and are to keep residents' personal information private. 2. Observation on 01/03/24 at 11:40 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K stood in the dining room with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) L and discussed an incident between two residents. Eight residents sat in the dining room and could hear the discussion. Observation on 01/03/24 at 12:00 P.M., LPN K and CNA L stood in the dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to accurately complete entrapment assessments, bedrail assessments, obtain physician orders, obtain consents for the use of bed rails for four residents (Resident #4, #30, #69 and #102). The facility census was 107. 1. Review of facility's policies showed staff did not provide a bed rail policy. 2. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 09/01/23, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses of Parkinson's (progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves) and Epilepsy (a seizure disorder); -Required full dependence for bed mobility; -Bed rails not used. Review of the resident's medical record showed the record did not contain documentation staff completed: -Entrapment assessment; -Bedrail assessment; -Obtained consent; -Obtained physicians orders. Observation on 01/02/24 at 2:52 P.M., showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-05-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO