Broadway Care & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 82.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 33% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 05/21/25, the OSDH determined an IJ situation was determined to exist related to accident hazards. 1.The facility failed to ensure hot liquids were served at a safe temperature. A resident assessment, dated 04/24/25, showed Resident #38 had severely impaired cognition and required supervision for eating. A May 2025 active physician's order summary showed Resident #38 had diagnoses which included dementia, delusional disorders, and blister unspecified thigh. An untitled document, dated 05/08/25, showed Resident #38 sustained a superficial burn injury on their upper left and right thigh after coming in contact with hot coffee. 2. The facility failed to ensure chemicals were properly secured when Resident #52 ingested Pine-Sol that was kept in a Styrofoam cup. A care plan, dated 03/07/25, showed Resident #52 had diagnoses which included intellectual disability, psychotic disorder, cerebral palsy, acute respiratory failure, and pneumonitis due to aspiration of vomit. A quarterly resident assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to access, monitor, and intervene for a resident at risk for pressure ulcers for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The director of nursing identified 11 residents residing in the facility had pressure ulcers. Findings: Resident #1 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #1's Skilled Nursing Note, dated 01/16/25, showed the resident's skin was intact and no breakdown noted. Resident #1's admission assessment, dated 01/27/25, showed no pressure ulcers. The assessment showed Resident #1 was dependent of one to two persons with transfers and toilet hygiene. Resident #1's Physician's Order, dated 02/05/25, showed zinc oxide ointment 20%, apply to buttocks/sacrum topically every shift for prophylaxis skin integrity. Resident #1's Skin Observation Tool, dated 02/11/25, showed the resident had no skin breakdown or wounds. The tool showed to continue with pillow program (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 (#4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for physician orders. The administrator identified 83 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A physician order, dated 04/21/25, showed the following medications were to be held starting 04/21/25:aspirin EC 9enteric coated) delayed release 81 mg (an antiplatelet medication used to prevent blood clots) for a procedure scheduled on 04/24/25.Plavix oral tablet 75 milligrams (antiplatelet medication used to prevent blood clots). A physician order, dated 04/24/25, showed Plavix )an anti-platelet) oral tablet was to be held on 04/26/25 for pacemaker placement. A review of the discontinued medications for Resident #4 showed these medications were not discontinued or held as ordered. A quarterly clinical assessment, dated 06/25/25, showed Resident #4 had diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy and cerebral ischemia. The assessment showed Resident #4 had a BIMS score of 6 which indicated severe cognitive impairment for decision making. On 07/30/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (#1) of 3 residents reviewed for elopement received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. The Administrator reported a census of 83.Findings:A facility incident report, dated 7/22/23, showed Resident #1 eloped from the locked unit and was returned to the facility by local law enforcement. A tour of the facility was conducted on 07/22/23 to observe the corrective changes made in the window mechanisms. A review of the facility's investigation did not indicate how far the resident went after leaving the facility or the exact time frame the resident had left the facility. Resident records were reviewed for updated elopement status. Maintenance logs were reviewed for daily checks on windows in the locked unit and weekly checks on the windows in the rest of the building.A quarterly assessment, dated 07/14/25, for Resident #1 showed a diagnosis of unspecified dementia and BIMS score of 3 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.On 07/23/25 at 1:53 p.m., the administrator reported they were notified around…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper PPE was used for 1 (#24) of 3 sampled residents observed for EBP. The administrator identified 75 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/29/25 at 8:39 a.m., the door frame to Resident #24's room was observed to have EBP signage and a tube feeding was observed hanging on a pole next to the resident's bed. On 05/29/25 at 8:57 a.m., LPN #1 entered Resident #24's room, closed the door, turned off the tube feeding, and checked placement with a stethoscope and syringe. LPN #1 had on gloves, but did apply a gown prior to accessing the resident's feeding tube. On 05/29/25 at 9:00 a.m., LPN #1 exited Resident #24's room to get water from a cart, returned to the resident's room, applied gloves, but still no gown was applied. PPE was observed inside the resident's room, on the back of the door, which included yellow gowns, gloves, and masks. A policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 05/15/24, read in part, The facility may expand the use of PPE [and] refer to the use of gown [and]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after an allegation of resident to resident abuse for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 79 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Prevention policy, revised 10/21/22, read in part, The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents .Report the results of all investigations to the administrator or designated representative and other officials in accordance with state law including State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included cognitive communication and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Resident #2's quarterly assessment, dated 10/30/24, showed a brief score for mental illness scored of three, indicating the resident's cognition was severely impaired. An unlabeled document, dated 11/19/24, read in part, Upon thorough investigation collecting statements from staff and residents,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained and EBP were followed during the provision of wound care for 1 (#6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The administrator identified 30 residents required enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: On 03/04/25 at 2:24 p.m., the wound care nurse was observed to enter Resident #6's room, wash their hands, don gloves, and provide wound care to Resident #6 who required EBP precautions. The wound care nurse did not wear a gown or mask to provide the care. An Enhanced Barrier Precautions, policy, dated 02/28/23, read in part, The Use of Gown & Gloves during High Contrast Resident Care Activities as indicated, when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply, for Facility Residents with Wounds. Resident #6 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region and resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs. Resident #6's care plan, created on 02/10/25, showed enhanced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identifed 75 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Prevention policy, revised 10/21/22, read in part, The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: visitors, and any other individual Abuse: The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation with refusing physical harm, and pain. Abuse may be visitor-to-resident. 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included anxiety, repeated falls, nicotine dependence, and alcoholic polyneuropathy. A Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated 11/13/24, documented Resident #1's cognition was severly impaired. It documented the resident made themselves understood and was able to understand others. A Incident Report OSDH form, dated 11/18/24, read in part, At approximately 3:45 a.m. resident noted yelling out from room, nurse immediately went to room and noted resident being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's rights to receive visitors of the resident's choice for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for visitation. The DON reported the census was 71. Findings: A Visitation Policy, revised 02/17, read in part, .Our facility permits residents to receive visitors subject to the resident's wishes .The facility provides 24-hour access to all individuals visiting with the consent of the resident . Resident #1 had diagnoses which included hypertension and anxiety disorder. A progress note, dated 03/25/24 at 2:19 pm, documented that a friend of Resident #1 called and wanted to visit the resident. The note further documented the facility contacted Resident #1's POA and the POA did not want the friend to visit. The note also documented that the friend was called back by the facility and informed the POA did not want him to visit. A progress note, dated 04/03/24 at 9:26 am, documented that a friend of Resident #1 called and wanted to visit the resident. The note further documented the facility contacted Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for the need and an informed consent was obtained prior to the use of shepherds hook bed rails for two (#14 and #38) of two residents reviewed for bed rails. The administrator identified six residents whose beds were equipped with a bed rail of any type. Findings: A Bed Mobility Assistive Devices/Bed Rails policy, dated July 2018, read in parts, .If a bed rail is determined to be the most effective intervention for resident positioning/safety, the following requirements must be met: Bed/Bedrail assessment .Review of risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative .Obtain informed consent prior to installation . 1. Res #14 had diagnoses which included heart failure, anxiety, and repeated falls. A physician order, dated 01/17/23, documented the resident may have a shepherd hook on bed for turning and repositioning. A quarterly assessment, dated 11/17/23, documented Res #14 was severely impaired in cognition, required supervision or touch assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy to a resident prior to transfer for one (#49) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The administrator reported the census was 71. Findings: A notification of Bed Hold policy, dated December 2018, read in part .When a resident/patient is discharged to a hospital, the facility will notify the resident/patient and responsible party of bed hold days remaining .Document communication in the medical records . Resident #49 had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder and anemia. A physician order, dated 02/07/24 at 11:45 a.m., documented the resident was to be sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. A review of Resident #49's health record did not document the resident, or their representative had been given notice of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer. On 02/15/24 at 11:38 a.m., the administrator stated they did not have documentation the resident or their representative had been provided with a copy of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a level II PASRR referral was made to the Oklahoma Health Care Authority for one (#15) of four residents who were reviewed for PASARR. The administrator reported the census was 71. Findings: A Policy titled PASRR Determination, dated November 2023, read in part .Level 2 screens are conducted when necessary to insure that a beneficiary requires nursing facility level of care and/or specialized services within the nursing facility .It is the responsibility of the NF to ensure a Level II is completed on a beneficiary that meets previous criteria .A yes answer to any of the six questions in Section E of the LTC-300R form .Requires a Screening for Level II PASRR . Resident #15 had diagnoses which included unspecified intellectual disabilities and anemia. A PASRR level 1 form, dated 12/08/23, documented the social worker from the hospital Resident #15 was admitted from contacted the OHCA regarding a 30-day PASRR exemption letter as the resident was being admitted for skilled care. The level I PASRR also documented in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$37,638 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $8,044 — penalty dated 2025-03-06
• $29,594 — penalty dated 2025-03-06
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-06 for 33 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK