Lansdowne Village
4624 Lansdowne Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63116 · For profit - Corporation · 145 certified beds · (314) 351-6888 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,015 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-07)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.3% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 48.7% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.9% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.6% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.2% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.2% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.7% | 23.5% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 44.0% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.5% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.3% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.84 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.37 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 136 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.3%CMS range 41.7–63.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 7.8–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.7–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 119.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a safe and effective medication system to ensure a newly admitted resident did not experience a significant medication error. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), hypertensive urgency and a urinary tract infection (UTI), with a discharge order for 4 blood pressure medications and antibiotics. As of the morning of [DATE], the resident had not received the ordered medications. This resulted in the resident experiencing an elevated blood pressure of 152/92 (Resident #369). In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents who admitted into the facility with a diagnosis of infection received ordered intravenous (IV, hollow tube used to administer fluids and medications) medications for three residents (Residents #313, #42 and #368). The facility also failed to provide an ordered gastrointestinal medication (Resident #365). The sample was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident after an aide left the resident unattended in the bathroom during toileting (Resident #33). The resident was found in the hallway across the room, laying on their back on the floor, with a gash to the forehead. The resident was sent to the emergency room and returned with bruising to the head, face, and neck areas. The census was 113. The Administrator was notified on 3/8/24 of the past non-compliance. The nursing staff immediately assessed the resident and treated for injuries. Staff called 911 and reported the unwitnessed fall to the resident's next of kin and physician. The facility immediately in-serviced staff on toileting residents. The subject matter included to never leave a resident unattended in the bathroom or shower. If supplies are needed, pull the call light for staff to come assist and to gather all supplies before giving care. Facility also in-serviced staff on the fall policy and change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services for one resident (Resident #5), who was placed on hospice and expressed pain. The facility failed to ensure the pain medication ordered by the hospice company was made available timely. This resulted in the resident expressing pain by yelling out with movement and care. In addition, staff completed wound care on the resident without waiting for pain medication to be administered. The census was 128. Review of the facility's Pain Management policy, dated 11/15/22, showed: -The facility will use a systematic approach to pain management, recognition, evaluation, treatment, and monitoring of pain. Individuals experiencing pain may receive pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions to assist in pain management; -Evaluate/prevent: Recognize when resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstance when pain can be anticipated. Manage/prevent pain, consistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing when facility staff did not provide wound treatments as ordered. This affected three residents (Residents #101, #86, and #92) of 23 sampled residents. The census was 110. Review of the facility's Skin Management Guidelines, revised July 2017, showed: -Purpose: -To identify at-risk residents for potential breakdown or ulcerations; -To prevent breakdown of tissue or ulcerations; -To provide treatment that promotes prevention of ulcerations and healing of existing ulcerations; -Risk factors: -Cognitive impairment; -Exposure of skin to urinary or fecal incontinence; -Under nutrition, malnutrition, and hydration deficits; -Upon admission, all residents are assessed for skin integrity by completing an assessment and documenting in the EHR (electronic health record); -Appropriate preventive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to adequately assess and treat pain for one of three residents investigated for pain concerns. The resident fell and suffered a broken hip, experienced severe pain and was not provided effective pain management (Resident #79). The facility also failed to provide ordered Tylenol for one hospice resident in pain (Resident #264). The sample was 23. The census was 110. Review of the facility's Pain Management Guidelines, revised September 2017, showed: -Purpose: To attain and maintain the highest practicable level of well-being and to prevent or manage pain, the facility to the fullest extent possible will: --Recognize when a resident is experiencing pain; --Identify circumstances when pain can be anticipated; --Evaluate existing pain and cause; -Upon admission, residents will be assessed for pain by using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus and recipes were followed to ensure they maintain nutritional value. Staff served the wrong meal for breakfast for one of three breakfast meal observations. Staff failed to follow the recipe for two of three puree diets to ensure proper nutritional value and texture. In addition, staff failed to follow meal tickets to ensure preferences were reasonably accommodated for one resident (Resident #24). This had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The census was 121.1. Review of the facility's menu for the date of 9/30/25, showed cereal of choice, breakfast sandwiches, bacon, and hashbrowns. Observation of the breakfast hall tray meal service on 9/30/25 from 8:30 A.M. thorough 10:00 A.M., showed no breakfast sandwiches observed to be provided. Residents got a variety of items, such as eggs, bacon, and oatmeal. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 1:22 P.M., Resident #4 said today for breakfast he/she got two fried…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare foods by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. In addition, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable for one of two sample trays tested. Residents interviewed reported concerns with the palatability and flavor of food (Residents #4, #61, #75, #118, and #6). The sample was 24. The census was 121.1. During an interview on 9/26/25 at 10:11 A.M., 10 residents who represent the resident council, said the food is terrible. Sometimes it is so bad you cannot eat it. The fried eggs are hard. The oatmeal is bad. They put dislikes on their meal tickets but are still served those items. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 1:49 P.M., Activity Aid M said the residents at the resident council meetings frequently complaint about the food taste and not being offered any condiments that would help with food taste. 2. Observation on 9/26/25 at 5:15 A.M., showed [NAME] J made pureed eggs. He/She placed cooked scrambled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food safety and facility policy on three of three days of observation. The facility failed to ensure the hot water in the hand washing sink was functional and failed to ensure staff washed their hands after touching their face mask, personal phone and other potentially unclean surfaces. Staff failed to clean food debris from the floors, dish washing 3-vat sink, equipment, and food preparation surfaces. Staff stored dried goods with no lids or the lids opened. In addition, drinks and other liquids were spilled in the dry storage room and not cleaned for all three days of observation. This had the potential to affect all residents who ate from the facility kitchen. The census was 121.1. Review of the Department of Health - City of [NAME] hand washing sign, posted at the handwashing sink, showed handwashing is done after handling garbage; before handling food; anytime you…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in the facility kitchen. Staff failed to ensure food debris was cleaned up daily resulting in roaches being present in the kitchen. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Pest Control policy, dated 8/2/21, showed:-The facility maintains an effective pest control program to remain free of pests and rodents. Pest control strategies are developed emphasizing kitchens, cafeterias, laundries, central supply areas, loading docks, construction, activities, and other regions prone to pest infestations;-All food stored in the dietary area is kept in a designated area in securely covered containers and stored off of the floor and away from the walls. Review of 5 months of pest control visit documents, showed:-Technician visit on 5/9/25: Target issue- ants. No further notes of the areas treated, recommendations, or findings;-Technician visit on 6/26/25: Target issues- spiders and mice. No further notes of the areas treated, recommendations, or findings;-Technician visit on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents/and or responsible parties were notified in a timely manner when resident accounts were within $200.00 of the Medicaid limit or when the resident's account was over the Medicaid limit ($6068.80) (Residents #19, #6 and #35). The facility also failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed for the final accounting for residents who expired, within 30 days. This affected two of three sampled residents who expired and had money in their accounts (Residents #131 and #129). The sample size was 24. The census was 121. Review of the facility's undated Business Office-Resident Trust Fund Policy and Procedure, showed:-Policy Statement: Residents of a skilled Nursing Center are to have their funds managed and personal spending money available to them. If the choice to open a trust account is made, the resident has the right to have their money safeguarded and accounted for by the Center. The Administrator ultimately will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required tube feeding for nutrition received the feedings as ordered and received the care to prevent complications. One resident did not receive tube feeding as ordered when the pump, which was set at the correct rate, did not deliver the feeding at the correct rate. In addition, as a result of the slow infusion of formula, staff did not change the tube feeding bottle as frequently as they otherwise would have. The tube feeding hung for over 24 hours, on two different days of the five days of observation, putting the resident at risk for receiving spoiled formula (Resident #44). In addition, one resident with a history of pneumonia was provided personal care with their head lowered as the tube feeding infused, increasing the risk for aspiration pneumonia. These deficient practices affected two of three residents investigated for tube feeding care. The sample was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Tube Feeding policy, dated 8/21/24, showed:-Residents with an order for tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve residents a nourishing snack at bedtime when the time between meals was more than 14 hours. This had the potential to affect all residents (including Residents #61, #24, #36 and #4), who ate from the facility kitchen. The sample was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Meals and Snacks policy, dated 3/31/21, showed:-Meal service shall be provided to residents on a regularly scheduled basis according to facility established times. Nutritional services shall be responsible for all food preparation including snacks and shall deliver meals to the residents or the nursing units. Snacks shall be delivered to the nursing units by nutritional services personnel. Nursing shall be responsible for distributing snacks to the residents;-Mealtimes shall be scheduled to ensure a maximum of 14 hours from dinner to breakfast on the following day;-The policy failed to address the requirement for a substantial snack delivered at bedtime when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards when staff failed to follow the facility's policy to use appropriate technique and hand hygiene during incontinence care (peri-care, cleansing the genitals and anal area) for 5 out of 5 residents observed (Residents #10, #59, #6, #117 and #69). The staff also failed to wear a gown when providing high contact care for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for 5 out of 6 residents observed (Residents #6, #117, #69, #75 and #57). The sample was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 4/28/22, showed:-The facility will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity for one resident (Resident #61) when a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) spoke rudely to the resident. The sample was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy dated 4/26/23, showed:-The facility shall treat residents with kindness, respect and dignity and ensure resident rights are being followed. The resident/resident representative will be informed on their rights upon admission;-Resident rights included: Respect and dignity. Review of Resident #61's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 9/4/25, showed:-Cognitively intact;-Diagnoses include depression and psychotic disorder. During an observation and interview on 10/1/25 at 8:32 A.M., the resident sat up in bed and drank coffee. LPN A knocked on the door, entered the room and handed the resident a medication cup. The resident took the medication and began to set the medication cup down. LPN A went to take the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to self-administer medications is protected if the interdisciplinary team has determined the practice is clinically appropriate for one resident (Resident #97) who had a desire to self-administer a medication and had an order to self-administer, with no assessment to ensure safe administration. The sample was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Bedside Medication Storage policy, dated 12/17, showed:-Bedside medication storage is permitted for residents how wish to self-administer medications, upon the written order of the prescriber and once self-administration skills have been assessed and deemed apocopate in the judgment of the facility's interdisciplinary resident assessment team;-A written order for the bedside storage of medication is present in the resident's medical record;-Bedside storage of medications is indicated on the resident medication administration record and in the care plan for the appropriate medications;-The resident is instructed in the proper use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents received an accurate assessment, reflective of the residents' status at the time of assessment, when the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) was incorrectly coded that the residents received insulin. (Residents #4 and #74). The sample was 24. The census was 121. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed:-Diagnoses included diabetes;-Record the number of days that insulin injections were received during the last 7 days or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days: one. Review of the order summary report, dated 10/1/25, showed a physician order for Ozempic (glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist) subcutaneous (under the skin) solution pen injector 2 milligram (mg)/1.5 milliliter (mL), inject 2 mg subcutaneous every Saturday related to type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2. Review of Resident #75's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed:-Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with personal care received the care timely for three residents who were left wet/soiled for extended periods (Residents #10, #59 and #6). Moreover, the facility failed to ensure staff cleansed all areas of the skin for these residents during incontinence care. The sample size was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Incontinent Care policy, dated 7/21/22, showed:-The facility will provide incontinence care as directed in the plan of care;-Perform hand hygiene and apply gloves;-Remove soiled brief/under-pad;-Cleanse perineal area from front to back;-Cleanse the rectal area;-Use a clean surface area of the cloth for each wipe;-Remove gloves and perform handy hygiene and apply clean gloves;-If necessary, apply protective ointment;-Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene;-Reposition resident in a safe/comfortable position. 1. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately provide assistance to promote good nutrition. The facility identified 33 residents who received fortified foods. On one of one day of meal preparation observation, the facility failed to prepare and serve fortified food, super cereal. The facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #11) with nutritional needs received fortified foods, health shakes and one on one meal assistance, as ordered. The sample size was 24. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Weight Variances policy, dated 3/31/21, showed:-Policy: All residents who experience significant, insidious and/or unintentional/unplanned weight loss or gain shall be assessed for nutritional status by the Registered Dietician (RD) to include but not limited to adding calorie rich/preferred snacks between meals, fortification, supplements, liberalizing diet and plan for expected weight changes. 1.Observation on 9/26/25 at 6:41 A.M., showed [NAME] J opened two quick rolled oats tubs. The tubs appeared to be 42 ounces. He/She poured one full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored appropriately. The facility identified ten medication/treatment carts and four medication rooms. Six of the ten carts and two of the four medication rooms were checked for medication storage. Issues were found in four medication carts and one medication room. Staff failed to date an opened Lispro insulin pen (fast-acting insulin used to manage blood sugar levels), to label two opened bottles of Nitroglycerin (used to treat and prevent chest pain in people with coronary artery disease) tablets, to store an opened Ensure (nutritional shakes used as meal supplement) carton with ice or refrigerate, and to make sure an opened topical cream had a cap or cover. In addition, the facility failed to label an opened Breo Ellipta inhaler (used to treat asthma) that was placed on the countertop in the medication room. The census was 121.Review of the facility's Storage of Medication policy, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards. Staff failed to schedule follow up appointments with the urologist (a doctor that specialized in the urinary system) for one resident (Resident #5) who has recurrent urinary tract infections and severe urethra erosion (damage to the urinary opening) from prolong use of an indwelling urinary catheter (flexible tubing that carries urine to outside of body into a urine catch bag). The sample size was 6. The census was 123. Review of the facility's Policy and Procedure for Physician Order, dated 9/28/2022, showed: -To provide guidance and ensure physician orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with professional standards, state and federal guidelines; -Service provided by licensed nurse, nursing administration and Director of Nursing (DON); -Orders must be recorded in the medical record by the licensed nurse authorized to transcribe such orders. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their licensed staff was competent in their knowledge of the facility policy for when to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR, an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions often combined with artificial ventilation to restore blood circulation and breathing) for one resident whose physician ordered him/her as a full code (CPR desired) when staff failed to have knowledge of when CPR would not be indicated in a full code resident, such as when there is evidence of clinical signs of irreversible death (Resident #3). This had the potential to affect 74 residents at the facility who have a full code status. The sample size was 6. The census was 120. Review of the facility's CPR policy, last reviewed [DATE], showed: -The Facility will provide Basic Life Support, prior to the arrival of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) including initiation of CPR to a Resident who experiences cardiac arrest (cessation of respirations and/or pulse) in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate, and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of the residents for three sampled residents, including one closed record (Residents #110, #51 and #112). The resident sample was 23. The census was 113. 1. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan Policy, revised 10/23/19, showed: -Policy: Each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care; -Procedure: The Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan shall be fully developed within 7 days after completion of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) Assessment; -The Interdisciplinary Team, along with the Resident and/or Resident Representative, will identify resident problems, needs, strengths, life history, preferences,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the floors in the main kitchen and walk in freezer were clean and free from trash and food debris and failed to ensure the air fryer was clean. The sample was 23. The census was 113. Review of the facility's nutritional services sanitation policy, dated 3/31/21, showed: -Policy: nutritional services shall ensure a clean and sanitary work environment; to promote and protect food safety; and to maintain compliance with federal, state, and local regulations governing food sanitation and safety; -Procedure: personnel shall be responsible for daily, weekly, and monthly cleaning assignments as determined by the Dietary Manager and/or his/her designee. Cleaning assignments shall include equipment, cabinets, storage areas, walls, food service-related carts, and refrigeration units. Frequency of completion shall be in conjunction with food safety regulation and with consideration of manufacturer guidelines. Cleaning of equipment condensers, lights, vents/fans, ceiling, ice machine, etc. shall be completed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents who required staff assistance to maintain nail care were provided personal care and hygiene (Residents #112, #72 and #7). The facility also failed to maintain one resident's hair, which was matted and long (Resident #112). The sample was 23. The census was 113. Review of the facility's Nail Care policy, 7/21/22, showed: -Policy: The purpose of Nail Care is to clean the nail bed, trim nails, and prevent infection; -Nails may be cleaned during bathing; -Nursing Assistants do not trim nails on diabetic residents. -Nail Care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming; -Observe/Report changes in the skin color around the nail bed, blueness of the nails, signs of poor circulation, cracking of the skin, swelling, bleeding, etc.; -Stop and report to the Charge Nurse ingrown nails, infection, pain, or nails that are thick and difficult to trim. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs, bathing, toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 26 opportunities, three errors occurred resulting in a 11.53% error rate (Residents #18, #15, and #221). The census was 113. 1. Review of the facility's Injectable Medication Administration policy, dated 8/2018, showed: -Purpose: To administer medications via subcutaneous (under the skin, as an injection), intradermal (between the layers of the skin, as an injection) and intramuscular (into the muscle, as an injection) routes in a safe, accurate, and effective manner; -Procedure: -Check order on the medication administration record (MAR) to see that an injection is currently ordered and due; -Remove air bubbles. Prime pen needle per manufactures guidelines. Review of the Novolog (insulin aspart, fast acting insulin) pen (injection device pre-filled with insulin) manufacturer's information, revised 2/2023, showed: -Preparing Novolog pen: -A. Pull off the pen cap. Wipe the rubber stopper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of significant medication errors related to the incorrect dosage administration of a controlled medication Ativan (lorazepam, a sedative used to treat anxiety) for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident #99). The census was 113. Review of Resident #99's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/29/23, showed: -admission date 12/22/23; -discharge date [DATE]; -Severe cognitive impairment; -Diagnoses include diabetes, dementia, end stage renal disease (ESRD) and acid reflux. Review of the a Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (SOAP) note by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) Q, dated 1/17/24 at 1:40 P.M., showed: -Subjective: Resident is seen today for concerns of increase in weakness and lethargy. Resident has not been showing much improvement with therapy. Spouse thinks it is his/her medication, memory deficit noted. Spouse trying to appeal stay due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records are maintained that are complete and accurately documented for one resident who obtained injuries and/or change in condition (Resident #33). Staff failed to accurately and completely document a the circumstances of a fight with another resident on 1/7/24, failed to document the circumstances surrounding a fall to include where the resident was found and how they were found on 2/2/24, and follow up observations and assessments regarding a change in condition on 2/7/24. The resident was transported to the hospital on all three dates. The sample was 23. The census was 113. Review of the facility's Accident and Incident documentation and investigation policy, revised 4/26/23, showed: -Policy: Accidents and/or Incidents involving Residents will be investigated and documented on an incident report entry in the electronic health record (EHR). An incident is defined as an occurrence which is not consistent with the routine operation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices during wound care for one resident (Resident #219) and blood glucose testing for two residents (Residents #18 and #73). The sample was 23. The census was 113. Review of the facility's Wound Management policy, reviewed 11/15/22, showed to promote wound healing of various types of wounds, the facility will provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders. Review of the facility's Standard Precautions policy, reviewed 10/25/22, showed: -Policy: The facility will use standard precautions which are the minimum infection prevention practices that apply to all resident care, regardless of suspected or confirmed infection status of the resident, in any setting where health care is delivered. These practices are designed to both protect the employee and prevent from spreading Infections among other residents; -Standard precautions include: Hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment and provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary interior for two residents (Residents #5 and #21). The census was 128. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 7/6/23, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance required for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; -Total dependence for bathing; -Diagnoses included cancer and dementia. Review of Resident #21's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Cognitively intact; -Extensive assistance required for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; -Physical help in part required for bathing activity; -Diagnoses included anxiety disorder and schizophrenia. Observation on 9/7/23 of Resident #5's and Resident #21's room, showed: -At 7:24 A.M., the room floor felt sticky and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene, for one of six sampled residents sampled (Resident #5). The facility failed to provide good grooming and personal care when the resident was observed with dirty and long finger nails and staff did not rinse soap and towel dry as directed during care. The census was 128. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 7/6/23, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance required for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; -Total dependence for bathing; -Diagnoses included cancer and dementia. Observation on 9/7/23 at 7:37 A.M., showed the Certified Wound Care Manager entered the resident's room with supplies to provide wound care. Observation of the resident's hands, showed very long and dirty nails. Underneath the nails was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection control when staff provided wound care for a resident and failed to sanitize their hands after removing gloves and prior to touching clean surfaces. In addition, staff positioned the resident's bed so the indwelling urinary catheter bag rested directly on the floor for one resident (Resident #5). The census was 128. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 4/28/22, showed: -The facility will provide guidelines to employees on proper handwashing and hand hygiene techniques that will aid in the prevention of the transmission of infections; -Hand hygiene should be performed following the clinical indications: Before/after providing care. Contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces. Before/After applying/removing Gloves/personal protective equipment. After handling soiled lines/items potentially contaminated with blood, body fluids, or secretions. Review of the facility's Catheter Care policy, dated October 2016, showed: -Purpose: To…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-11 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full time basis. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The sample was 23. The census was 110. Review of the facility's license and certification records showed the facility was licensed for 145 beds and all 145 beds were certified for Medicaid and Medicare. Review of the Facility Assessment, updated 1/1/22, showed Social Worker Q was identified as staff completing Social Services. Review of the facility's key personnel list, received 3/14/22, showed Social Worker Q was identified in the role of the facility Social Worker. Review of Social Worker Q's employee record, showed a re-hire date of 10/22/20. He/she worked in Admissions. During an interview on 3/21/22 at 4:14 P.M., Social Worker Q said he/she worked in Social Services since 7/6/21. He/she worked in Admissions since he/she was hired by the facility; however, he/she did everything for social services because there was not a steady Social Worker since October 2020. They hired a couple of social workers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to document in writing, their actions and rationale regarding residents' ongoing and/or new concerns expressed during resident group meetings regarding medications being received late or not at all, showers not received, missing property and contact information of local agencies. The facility census was 110. Review of the facility's Resident's [NAME] of Rights, undated, showed: -Residents Rights. The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility, including those specified in this section; -The right to retain and use personal possessions, including furnishings, and clothing, as space permits, unless to do so would infringe upon the rights or health and safety of other residents; -The resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their grievance policy and ensure residents were educated on the grievance process. The facility failed to provide prompt resolution of Resident #68's grievance regarding wound care and pain medication administration. The facility also failed to provide prompt resolution of grievances and ensure complaints of lost/stolen items were investigated for three residents (Residents #73, #43 and #7). The facility census was 110. Review of the facility's Grievance/Missing Property policy, dated 8/30/18, revised on 4/28/21, showed: -Residents and resident representatives have the right to voice concerns or grievances, which affect their lives at this facility, without fear of discrimination or reprisal. All residents, resident representatives and families also have the right to report property/items that may be missing; -Purpose: To provide an opportunity for residents, resident representatives, and/or family to present concerns or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the state Nurse Aide (NA) Registry was checked for a Federal Indicator of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property, for nine out of ten reviewed employees. The census was 110. Review of the Facility's Abuse Prevention Policy, reviewed 4/28/21, showed: -Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the resident from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual; -Steps to prevent, detect, and report: The facility conducts employee background checks and will not knowingly employ any individual who has been convicted of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating individuals or misappropriation of property; -The facility will pre-screen all potential new employees and residents for a history of abusive behavior. Review of the facility's Employee Handbook, showed federal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for 12 residents (Resident #313, #312, #314, #217, #215, #216, #214, #266, #367, #364, #368 and #101) of 23 sampled residents within 48 hours of admission to provide instructions needed for the provision of effective and person-centered care of the residents. The census was 110. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan policy, dated 1/23/19, showed: -Definitions: --Interdisciplinary-All disciplines will collaborate to develop a plan of care that meets the residents' needs, preferences, and goals; --Baseline Care Plan-Is developed within 48 hours of admission and updated with a change in resident condition as applicable until completion of the comprehensive care plan; -Procedure: --A Baseline Care Plan is to be developed within 48 hours. Develop initial goals based upon admission orders/resident's input and record on the baseline care plan. Provide the resident or resident's representative a copy of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate, and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of the residents for ten of 23 sampled residents (Residents #43, #96, #42, #10, #364, #368, #101, #213, #104, and #90). The census was 110. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan Policy, dated 1/23/19 and reviewed on 1/24/19, showed: -Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team (IDT) will provide care. -Responsibility: Interdisciplinary Team Members; -Definitions: -Interdisciplinary-All disciplines will collaborate to develop a plan of care that meets the residents' needs, preferences, and goals; -Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan (CCP)-Contains services provided, preference, ability, and goals for admission, desired outcomes, and care level guidelines; -Procedure: -The Comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice by failing to document treatments for one resident admitted with a burn (Resident #65). The facility failed to administer medications per physician's orders for ten of 23 sampled residents (Residents #32, #25, #65, #22, #68, #79, #86, #92 ,#104, and #500). The facility failed to document blood sugar results for one resident (Resident #22), failed to document the provision of physical/occupational therapies, and to call for bone density results for one resident (Resident #110), failed to document weekly skin assessments for two residents (Residents #43 and #98), failed to document flushing and checking placement of a gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for supplemental feeding) for one resident (Resident #10), failed to document treatments for two residents (Residents #92 and #104).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services related to communication, including speech and language service, by failing to provide language assistive devices for three of three sampled residents (Residents #212, #59, and #62) who communicated in a different language. The facility also failed to update the residents' person centered care plans with information regarding how the resident communicated with staff. The census was 110. Review of the facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 3/14/22, showed the following resident characteristics: -Do not communicate in the dominant language of the facility: 4 residents; -Use non-oral communication devices: 4. 1. Review of Resident #212's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Diagnoses included diabetes, thyroid disorder, dementia, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the transportation driver transported residents in a safe manner for two residents (Resident #89 and #500). The facility failed to ensure fall incidents were reported, investigated, interventions implemented, and post-fall monitoring completed for two of three residents sampled for falls (Resident #90 and #89). The facility also failed to ensure medications were stored safely and in accordance with facility policy and procedure. The sample was 23. The census was 110. Review of the facility's Fall Management policy, revised 7/14/17, showed: -Fall event: When a fall occurs, assess resident for injury prior to moving resident; -The Licensed Nurse will complete: Risk report in electronic medical record; -24 hour report; -Communicate all resident falls to the attending physician and the resident's family and document on the incident and accident form; -The Interdisciplinary Team Meeting (IDT) will review all resident falls within 24-72…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets assisted residents to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for each resident. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents, by failing to provide wound treatments, failed to verify and administer medications per physician's orders, post fall assessments, assess and identify a resident's need for mental health services. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all staff were adequately trained and informed of facility policies and expectations per acceptable nursing standards. The census was 110. Review of the Facility Assessment, updated 1/1/22, showed: -Education/In-services: Communication: Annually and as needed (PRN); -Resident's rights and facility responsibilities, ensure that staff members are educated on the rights of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident by not ensuring initial and quarterly social service assessments were completed for four (Residents #212, #110, #23 and #43) of 23 sampled residents. The facility also failed to ensure policies and procedures were in place for two of two residents reviewed for appropriateness for the secured unit (Residents #59 and #62). The census was 110. Review of the Facility Assessment, updated 1/1/22, showed: -Services provided based on resident need: Mental health and behavior; -Manage the medical conditions and medication-related issues causing psychiatric symptoms and behavior, identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with issues such as dealing with anxiety, care of someone with cognitive impairment, care of individuals with depression, trauma/Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure two of two medication carts contained insulin vials and insulin pens (pre-measured) that were labeled with an open date, stock medications/supplements did not exceed their expiration date, failed to follow their policy regarding labeling with expiration dates, failed to label one injectable multi-use medication vial and one multi use tube of medication with a resident's name, failed to ensure refrigerated medications did not exceed their expiration date, and failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were monitored and recorded for two of two medication refrigerators. The sample was 23. The census was 110. Review of the medication storage policy, dated 11/2018, showed: -Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, and properly following the manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier; -Procedure:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a process was in place for STAT (immediate) laboratory testing for influenza to be obtained and results received in a timely manner for five residents (Residents #111, #7, #76, #27, and #45). The facility used specimen collection swabs that were not compatible with their current lab, resulting in delayed testing and diagnosis. The sample was 23. The census was 110. Review of the facility's Laboratory Test policy, reviewed 4/28/21, showed: -Policy: Laboratory tests may be completed on residents upon admission or re-admission if not already performed at the discharging facility. Lab tests are completed as ordered by the physician or physician extender such as Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant, and Clinical Nurse Specialist. Physician Orders supersede any guidelines listed in this policy; -Responsibility: All licensed nursing personnel monitored by Director of Nursing (DON) or Designee; -Equipment: Lab scheduling; -Lab requisition form; -Computer; -Procedure: Licensed Nurse, or designee, shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, facility staff did not conduct and document a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility failed to identify the needs of residents who do not communicate in the dominant language of the facility. The facility also failed to accurately document the number of residents with behavioral health needs. The facility census was 110. Review of the facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 3/14/22, showed the following resident characteristics: -Documented signs and symptoms of depression: 41 residents; -Dementia: 26 residents; -Documented psychiatric diagnosis: 25 residents; -Medications: Any psychoactive medication: 74 residents; -Anti-psychotic medications: 30; -Anti-anxiety medications: 13; -Anti-depressant medications: 47; -Hypnotic medications: 3; -Who do not communicate in the dominant language of the facility: 4 residents; -Who use non-oral communication devices: 4. Review of the Facility Assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to vaccinate eligible residents with the Influenza vaccine as indicated by the current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, unless the resident had previously received the vaccine, refused, or had a medical contraindication present for five out of five residents reviewed for Influenza vaccination (Residents #27, #86, #98, #104 and #23). In addition, three residents developed flu-like symptoms (Residents #27, #111, and #45) with one residents testing positive for Influenza A (Resident #27). The sample was 23 residents. The census was 110. Review of the facility's Influenza Vaccine policy, dated March 2017, showed: -Policy statement: All residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to close a privacy curtain or door, leaving one resident (Resident #79) in his/her gown, and one resident (Resident #86) in his/her gown with no brief, and exposed to those in the hall. The facility failed to maintain resident privacy by hanging signs regarding care for specific residents at the nurse's station, visible to all who entered the unit. The facility failed to approach and provide care to one resident (Resident #101) in a respectful and dignified manner when a nurse aide failed provide care in a calm, caring, and patient manner. The census was 110. Review of the facility's Resident [NAME] of Rights, revised November 2016, showed: -Residents Rights: The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with/and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility, including those specified in this section; -A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account. The facility did not provide residents refunds of their personal funds from the operating account in a timely manner for six residents (Resident #12, #14, #34, #35, #37 and #38). The facility census was 110. 1. Record review of the facility's maintained Accounts Receivable Report for the period 03/01/21 through 03/21/22, showed the following residents with personal funds held in the facility operating account. Resident Amount Held in Operating Account #12 $2,039.00 #14 $2,170.36 #34 $ 948.00 #35 $4,511.47 #37 $3,090.00 #38 $2,476.50 Total $15,235.33 During an interview on 03/21/22 at 12:09 P.M., the Business Office Manager said the refunds should have been completed but had not been done.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to reconcile the resident trust account monthly, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The facility census was 110. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Account for the period 03/01/21 through 03/21/22, showed the facility could not provide zero-balanced reconciliations for April 2021 through October 2021. During an interview on 03/21/22 at 5:40 P.M., the Regional Business Office Manager said the resident trust reconciliations should show a zero balance for a reconciliation. During an interview on 03/30/22 at 3:50 P.M., the Business Office Manager said they are researching why the account was not reconciling to a zero-balance.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a final accounting of resident trust fund balances within thirty days to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate from four residents (Resident #10, #22, #24, and #26) out of a sample of six. The facility census was 110. 1. Record review of the facility Discharge List for the period [DATE] through [DATE], showed Resident #10 expired on [DATE]. Record review of the facility maintained Resident Statement for the period [DATE] through [DATE], showed the facility did not submit Resident #10's funds or a Personal Funds Account Balance Report (TPL) for $2,651.29 to the Department of Social Services until [DATE] (143 days after Resident #10 expired.) During an interview on [DATE] at 8:47 A.M., the Business Office Manager said he/she was waiting for insurance to bill before the TPL Form was sent. 2. Record review of the facility Discharge List for the period [DATE] through [DATE], showed Resident #22 expired on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0571 — isolatedLimit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility imposed a charge for a service for which payment was made under Medicaid for four residents (Resident #5, #8, #19, and #23) out of a sample of 4. The facility census was 110. Record review of the Missouri Department of Social Services, MO Health Net Division State Regulations for Medicaid Reimbursement for Long Term Care Facilities, showed the following: 13 CSR 70-10.010 (5) Covered Supplies, Items and Services. All supplies, items and services covered in the per-diem rate must be provided to the resident as necessary. Supplies and services which would otherwise be covered in a per diem rate but which also are billable to the Title XVIII Medicare program must be billed to that program for facilities participating in the Title XVIII Medicare program. Covered supplies, items and services include, but are not limited to, the following: (K) All routine care items, including disposables and including, but not limited to, those items specified in Appendix A to this rule; Record review of Appendix A showed the following items covered under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete admission comprehensive assessments within 14 calendar days after admission to the facility and annual comprehensive assessments not less than once every 12 months (366 days) to assess functional capacity using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) for three out of 23 sampled residents (Residents #212, #368 and #364). The census was 110. Review of the facility's MDS 3.0 policy, revised 10/7/21, showed: Policy: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standard comprehensive assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified facilities mandated by federal law to be completed and electronically transmitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) in compliance with the guidelines provided in the MDS 3.0 RAI User's Manual; -Responsibility: MDS Coordinator and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) members; -Procedure: The MDS Coordinator, in conjunction with the IDT, is expected to complete assessments using the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess residents using the quarterly review Minimum Data Set assessment timely for two of 23 sampled residents (Residents #7 and #6). The census was 110. Review of the facility's MDS 3.0 policy, revised 10/7/21, showed: Policy: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standard comprehensive assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified facilities mandated by federal law to be completed and electronically transmitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) in compliance with the guidelines provided in the MDS 3.0 RAI User's Manual; -Responsibility: MDS Coordinator and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) members; -Procedure: The MDS Coordinator, in conjunction with the IDT, is expected to complete assessments using the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessment (RAI) specified by the state in compliance with the MDS 3.0 RAI user's manual guidelines; -The MDS Coordinator and/or IDT will use the following when completing the assessment as directed by the RAI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate discharge procedures and complete discharge and/or transfer documentation. This affected two out of three closed records reviewed for discharge planning (Residents #218 and #314). The census was 110. Review of the facility's Discharge Plan/Summary- Voluntary policy, last reviewed 10/7/21, showed: -Policy: An interdisciplinary summary is completed on a resident upon discharge to assure the continuum of care needs of the resident are met; -Responsibility: A licensed nurse, social services, therapist, registered dietician/certified food service director, activities director; -Guidelines: -A physician order must be obtained; -Upon notification of impending discharge, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) should be notified to allow staff the opportunity to educate and implement a safe discharge. Social work should coordinate discharge planning process; -When discharged to a healthcare facility, staff should document who the information was sent to and when it was sent, as well as provide the following items:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers were received as scheduled/desired and to ensure residents were well groomed, clean, and free of odors for four (Residents #368, #313, #32, and #25) of 23 sampled residents. The census was 110. 1. Review of Resident #368's medical record showed: -An admission date of 2/22/22; -Diagnoses included diabetes, left leg above-the-knee amputation, muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the resident's initial care plan, dated 3/15/22, showed: -Focus: At risk for skin breakdown; -Goal: Will have intact skin, free of redness, blisters, discoloration through review date; -Interventions: Pressure reducing mattress to bed, report changes in skin integrity to nurse. Review of the resident's Activities of Daily Living task sheet (ADLs- daily self-care activities) for the month of March 2022 showed no showers or baths documented. The facility failed to provide bath/skin assessment sheets for the resident. Observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed maintain a system to obtain resident preferences related to initiation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR-basic life support provided prior to the arrival of emergency medical services for residents who experience cardiac arrest-cessation of respiration and/or pulse) upon admission for three residents (Residents #25, #23 and #212). The facility failed to ensure facility staff had access to current code status documentation, to follow up on changes to code status and documentation when requested by the resident (Resident #68, 98, and #73) so that staff knew immediately what action to take or not take if an emergency arises. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the transportation driver maintained active cardiopulmonary (CPR) certification. The sample size was 23. The census was 110. Review of the facility's Advance Directive policy, dated [DATE], showed: -Policy: It is the policy of the facility to respect the resident's right of self-directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a restorative program for assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence. The facility failed to provide recommended restorative services for two sampled residents (Resident #32 and #110) out of 23 sampled residents. The census was 110. Review of the Resident Screening and Assessment for Establishment of a Restorative Nursing Program, dated 1/1/14, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidance on a process for screening and assessing residents for further evaluation and development of a restorative nursing program and serve as a baseline of function; -Procedure: -Upon identification of a potential functional decline, the referring nurse shall complete the restorative assessment form; -The restorative assessment form will be forwarded to the restorative nurse, or the Director of Nursing (DON) in the absence of a restorative nurse for further evaluation; -The restorative nurse will collaborate with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor weights and ensure nutritional services were provide to each resident, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment for two residents (Residents #16 and #400). Facility staff failed to ensure weights were obtained and documented as ordered. The sample was 23. The census was 110. Review of the Weight and Hydration Management Overview, dated February 2016, included: -Overview: -The resident's nutritional status will be monitored on a regular basis. Residents are expected to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight, protein levels, unless the clinical condition demonstrates this is not possible. The measurement of weight is a guide in determining the nutritional status. Therefore, the evaluation of the significance of weight gain or loss is a crucial part of the assessment process. Nutritional status, including weight, is influenced by calories, protein and fluid; -Nutrients are essential for many…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided proper respiratory care when the staff failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy (supplemental oxygen) and date oxygen tubing and oxygen humidifiers (device used to humidify supplemental oxygen) for three sampled residents (Residents #23, #79 and #28). The census was 110. Review of the Oxygen Administration and Storage policy and procedure, dated 1/1/14, showed: -Purpose: to ensure staff follow safety guidelines and regulations for storage and use of oxygen; -General guidelines: -Concentrator (medical device that provide extra oxygen) filters: Filters should be removed and cleaned by rinsing with clear, cool water weekly to maximize flow rate of clean air; -Tubing: Oxygen tubing should be of length sufficient to provide the resident with adequate oxygen levels while promoting maximum mobility: -Tubing should be changed weekly; -Nasal cannula (a device for delivering oxygen) tubing may need to be changed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide thorough assessments, orders, monitoring and ongoing communication with the dialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) center for one closed record review (Resident #42). The sample size size 23. The census was 110. Review of Resident #42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 2/23/22, showed: -Cognitively intact; -No set up/physical assist for dressing, eating, bed mobility, and personal hygiene; -One staff person assistance for transfers and toileting; -Lower extremity impairment, one side; -Walker/Wheelchair for mobility; -Diagnoses included kidney failure, diabetes, and depression. Review of the resident's current electronic physician's order sheet, showed: -An order, dated 1/15/22, up on dialysis days by 6:00 A.M. to be ready for dialysis; -No order to assess the dialysis fistula (a connection made between veins and arteries) by bruit (a sound heard over an artery or vascular channel, reflecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate person-centered care and met the highest practicable psychosocial well-being when the facility failed to provide assessment and mental health services for two sampled residents. The facility failed to provide a mental health assessment and social history assessment for one resident who did not speak English, who was admitted with active physician's order for Prazosin, a medication used to treat Post-Traumatic Stress Order (PTSD, a mental health condition that is triggered by a terrifying, shocking, or scary event either by experiencing or witnessing it.) The facility failed to obtain information regarding the resident's history of PTSD, including the stressors and triggers of the trauma, symptoms related to PTSD, and a history and assessment of the resident's diagnoses of schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by significant alterations in perception, thoughts, mood, and behavior), psychosis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 25 opportunities observed, 2 errors occurred resulting in an 8.0% error rate (Residents #7 and #101). The census was 110. Review of the facility's Physician Orders policy and procedure, revised 7/1/17, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidance to ensure physicians' orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with professional standards; -Policy: -All orders shall be provided by licensed practitioners (physician, nurse practitioner (NP), or physician assistant (PA)) authorized to prescribe such orders; -Orders must be recorded in the medical record by the licensed nurse authorized to transcribe such orders; -Physician orders must be documented clearly in the medical record. The required components of a complete order: date and time of receipt of the order, name of the practitioner providing the order, name and strength of the product, quantity or specific duration, dosage and frequency of administration, route of administration, indication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely provide or obtain the required services from an outside resource, for one resident with physician orders for rehabilitation services (Resident #25). The resident was admitted to the facility with orders for physical and occupational therapy evaluations, which were not completed timely. The sample was 23. The census was 110. Review of the Physician Orders policy and procedure, revised 7/1/17, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidance to ensure physician orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with professional standards; -Policy: -All orders shall be provided by licensed practitioners (physician, nurse practitioner (NP), or physician assistant (PA) authorized to prescribe such orders. Review of Resident #25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/18/21, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Total staff assistance with dressing and transfers; -Required extensive staff assistance for toileting and hygiene; -Diagnoses of aphasia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team who was responsible for working with hospice representatives to coordinate care. The facility also failed to asses a hospice resident's pain level per the physician's order (Resident #264). The census was 110. 1. Review of Resident #264's medical record showed: -An admission date of 1/14/22; -Discharge/death in facility on 1/17/22. Review of the resident's hospital discharge instructions, dated [DATE], showed he/she was admitted for cardiac arrest. Multiple goals of care discussions were had with family and the decision to artificially prolong life was not something the resident would want. He/she was transitioned to comfort care measures. He/she was discharged to a facility on hospice. Hospice care focuses on making you comfortable during the last months of your life. Review of the resident's electronic physician's orders sheet (ePOS) showed: -An order, dated 1/14/22, for acetaminophen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-04-11 · tag F0574 — widespreadThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accessible, readily available information and contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program and the State Survey Agency that could be read by residents in the facility without assistance. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The census was 110. Review of the facility's Resident's [NAME] of Rights, undated, showed a facility must not prohibit or in any way discourage a resident from communicating with federal, state, or local officials, including, but not limited to, federal and state surveyors, other federal or state health department employees, including representatives of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and any representative of the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy system for individuals with mental disorder (established under the Protection and Advocacy for Mentally Ill Individuals Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 10801 et seq.), regarding any matter, whether or not subject to arbitration or any other type of judicial or regulatory action.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-04-11 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. The sample was 23. The census was 110. Observation on 3/14/22 at 12:00 P.M., 3/15/22 at 10:09 A.M., 3/16/22 at 9:18 A.M., 3/17/22 at 9:37 A.M., 3/18/22 at 9:16 A.M., 3/21/22 at 10:00 A.M., 3/22/22 at 10:20 A.M. and 3/28/22 at 12:30 P.M., showed no survey binder readily available, nor a sign indicating where the binder was located. During an interview on 3/23/22 at 10:45 A.M., nine out of nine active members of the resident council said they were not aware of the location of the survey binder. During an interview on 3/28/22 at 12:54 P.M., the Corporate Nurse said the survey binder was located in the front lobby. The Corporate Nurse walked to the front lobby and saw the survey binder was not on top of the desk in the lobby. She said she expected the binder to remain in the lobby and to be accessible for everyone.
- No harm found · C2022-04-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the required nurse staffing in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors on a daily basis. The census was 110. Observations from 3/14/22 through 3/18/22, 3/21/22 through 3/25/22, and 3/28/22, showed the facility did not post the nurse staff sheet in a prominent place readily visible and accessible to residents and visitors. During observation and interview on 3/28/21 at 12:54 P.M., the Corporate Nurse said the staffing coordinator was responsible for posting the hours. The nurse staff posting was located behind the double doors to the resident use TV room. The Corporate Nurse walked to the location of the staff posting. Behind the double doors stood a five tier bookcase. The staff posting was inside a frame, inside the fifth tier of the bookcase. The Corporate Nurse said the location was not in an accessible or visible area to visitors and staff.
- No harm found · C2022-04-11 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully implement their staff vaccination policy for COVID-19 by failing to ensure one contracted agency staff was fully vaccinated or had an approved exemption prior to working in the facility. The facility had a vaccination rate of 100% of facility employed staff fully vaccinated or with an exemption/delay, and no residents with COVID-19 infections within the last four weeks. The census was 110. 1. Review of the Covid vaccine policy, dated 1/14/22, showed: -Policy: to comply with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) federal mandate that all facility employees are vaccinated against Covid-19, unless the staff had a religious or medical exemption; -Definitions: -Fully vaccinated: 2 weeks or more since completion of a primary vaccination series for Covid-19. A primary vaccination series is defined as the administration of a single dose vaccine, or the administration of all required doses of a multi-dose vaccine; -Boosters or additional doses are not required to be considered fully vaccinated;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,015 — penalty dated 2023-09-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LANSDOWNE INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 11/01/2020 |
| WILLIAMS, ARTHUR | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| BIENSTOCK, JUDAH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2020 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265351. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.